50 isn't decrepit, it's where it starts yes, but only the start. He'd start sliding pretty quick after that but he'd still be capable of a lot at that point.
The real thing the game glosses over is his recovery time. He could do a lot of the stuff he does but not bounce back to keep going like he does. Not without stopping to rest for like an hour after every big escape and the adrenaline waned. If not significantly longer. He'd have fricked up hands, a lot more scars and fractures from fights and stuff.
Then again this is a world where spores don't cling to clothing and/or magically disappear when you leave the tunnel they're growing because that wouldn't be fun. As waiting for old man Joel to catch his breath wouldn't be either.
A nearly 60 year old Mike Tyson could still knock you flat on your ass unconscious, but he'd get gassed quick and spend days feeling sore. Old man strength is real, it doesn't diminish much with age if you stay active, but staying active becomes harder because our bodies need so much more time to recover. For women, though, their bones turn brittle at 50, and their bones are weaker than mens to begin with so they get feeble more quickly.
No, you're almost assuredly a subliterate twit with an IQ under 80 who themselves is unable to formulate rudimentary English sentences...
It's indisputably grammatically correct and indeed comports with authoritative grammatical texts, so I think the projecting seething coping morono is you...
>ignominious ignoramus interminably ignited from inflammatory inputs...
1 year ago
Anonymous
Ignorant hoi polloi like you need to retreat now. My in perpetuum burgeoning desiderate in pursuance of cognizance that was whilom procured must not be ignored. How I wish to suspire and rejoice once again in the erudite phrenic intelligentsias's acquisition of acumen, epithetical savoir faire; exhibiting tranquil nirvana. I say to anons such as you, absquatulate expeditiously. Pernicious duplicity and intellectual dishonesty pertaining to those in support of these occurrences transpired shan't be tolerated.
1 year ago
Anonymous
A most humourous and comical discourse has commenced with an imbecile operating under the verneer of a esteemed intellectual; though decidedly evident the basal intentions of such a scheming fellow. Whereas legitimately moronic individuals pontificate trivially discernable incongruous assertions, the individual residing in the intellectual intellegrum is certainly more bathetic... that I postulate.
No its correct you see people who only speak English say "what drug are you ON" all the time. Like shit just look up Joe Rogan
Good thing he never said that huh anon.
1 year ago
Anonymous
>he's on drugs is okay >he's on roids is not
loving every laugh
1 year ago
Anonymous
The autist is kinda right. You're conflating roids with "gear", and the correct expression is that someone is "on gear" not that they're "on roids". Simple mistake, since in context roids and gear refer to the same thing. To use roids correctly, you'd simply say that some does roids.
Anon's referring to the section of the post that said "on that universe" instead of "in that universe". I think the original anon that replied mistook what he was trying to say, and is now just focusing on the on drugs part to try and save face.
>he's on drugs is okay >he's on roids is not
loving every laugh
Taken was better because it was one washed up field agent against a bunch of serial rapists and kidnappers, who prey on tourists. Expendables had to be one of the most unbearable movies to watch seeing monstrosities roided up, filled with all kinds of plastics and CGI. Watching a deer getting mauled by a bear would be less unsettling than seeing a 60+ brain damaged Stallone holding a gatling gun.
You'd be shocked how long the body can keep going when you keep it in shape. The clock doesn't turn over on your 50th birthday and everything instantly fails unless you're a ham planet American
yeah but he had something at his disposal other 50-year-olds did not:
dicky
50 isn't decrepit, it's where it starts yes, but only the start. He'd start sliding pretty quick after that but he'd still be capable of a lot at that point.
The real thing the game glosses over is his recovery time. He could do a lot of the stuff he does but not bounce back to keep going like he does. Not without stopping to rest for like an hour after every big escape and the adrenaline waned. If not significantly longer. He'd have fricked up hands, a lot more scars and fractures from fights and stuff.
Then again this is a world where spores don't cling to clothing and/or magically disappear when you leave the tunnel they're growing because that wouldn't be fun. As waiting for old man Joel to catch his breath wouldn't be either.
Also this
A nearly 60 year old Mike Tyson could still knock you flat on your ass unconscious, but he'd get gassed quick and spend days feeling sore. Old man strength is real, it doesn't diminish much with age if you stay active, but staying active becomes harder because our bodies need so much more time to recover. For women, though, their bones turn brittle at 50, and their bones are weaker than mens to begin with so they get feeble more quickly.
He was on roids. TLOU2 proved roids were abundant on that universe.
>on
Why do ESLs flock to Ganker
That's a perfectly cromulent use of "on".
The syntax checks out.
>"What (drugs) are you on?"
If it makes you take a double take and forces you to re-read it, it's probably wrong.
Maybe you're just dumb?
No.
The syntax is completely off, moron. Next you're going to say get a move in is proper syntax.
No, you're almost assuredly a subliterate twit with an IQ under 80 who themselves is unable to formulate rudimentary English sentences...
It's indisputably grammatically correct and indeed comports with authoritative grammatical texts, so I think the projecting seething coping morono is you...
Use a syntax tree, dumbass.
>ignominious ignoramus interminably ignited from inflammatory inputs...
Ignorant hoi polloi like you need to retreat now. My in perpetuum burgeoning desiderate in pursuance of cognizance that was whilom procured must not be ignored. How I wish to suspire and rejoice once again in the erudite phrenic intelligentsias's acquisition of acumen, epithetical savoir faire; exhibiting tranquil nirvana. I say to anons such as you, absquatulate expeditiously. Pernicious duplicity and intellectual dishonesty pertaining to those in support of these occurrences transpired shan't be tolerated.
A most humourous and comical discourse has commenced with an imbecile operating under the verneer of a esteemed intellectual; though decidedly evident the basal intentions of such a scheming fellow. Whereas legitimately moronic individuals pontificate trivially discernable incongruous assertions, the individual residing in the intellectual intellegrum is certainly more bathetic... that I postulate.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/on%20drugs
Good thing he never said that huh anon.
>he's on drugs is okay
>he's on roids is not
loving every laugh
The autist is kinda right. You're conflating roids with "gear", and the correct expression is that someone is "on gear" not that they're "on roids". Simple mistake, since in context roids and gear refer to the same thing. To use roids correctly, you'd simply say that some does roids.
>get a move on!
...how is that wrong
Huh?
>he was on drugs!
Good thing he never said that now isn't that right anon.
>Good thing he never said that now isn't that right anon.
lmao what
Anon's referring to the section of the post that said "on that universe" instead of "in that universe". I think the original anon that replied mistook what he was trying to say, and is now just focusing on the on drugs part to try and save face.
Like this.
I thought when he said "in" was just a typo
No its correct you see people who only speak English say "what drug are you ON" all the time. Like shit just look up Joe Rogan
Dad fantasy, like Liam Neeson in Taken, or the whole Expendables series of movies.
>this gruff bastard still has it, he just needs to get moving first
Taken was better because it was one washed up field agent against a bunch of serial rapists and kidnappers, who prey on tourists. Expendables had to be one of the most unbearable movies to watch seeing monstrosities roided up, filled with all kinds of plastics and CGI. Watching a deer getting mauled by a bear would be less unsettling than seeing a 60+ brain damaged Stallone holding a gatling gun.
Stallone has a 150+ IQ
So that's why he chose to do Stop! Or My Mom Will Shoot!
No, that's why he chose to namedrop the israelites.
Where? When? That's pretty based considering the industry he works in.
He posted something about how they were occult vampires on Instagram, basically exposing Pizzagate and global homo.
Oh, I'm not saying it was high art or anything, just that the impulse that created The Expendables lead to Joel, too.
Joel was deliberately not flexible though. Wtf are you on about?
he can barely turn around
>American (Texan) isn’t obese
That shit was unbelievable as well
What about the the time where fell 20-feet onto a piece of rusty rebar and managed to not get tetanus or die from any kind of internal bleeding?
Ellie needed to warm him so she got naked and sleep with Joel everyday, and she wanted to suck him, but that would make him weaker so she waited...
was that in one of the comics cause i feel like i glanced over that part?
What, is this canon, where did you hear this from wow
>what the frick
eat healty and stay active.
my dad is 67 and jacked as a hammer.
For as much as the guy crouch walked he never seemed to be bothered or complained about lower back pain.
You'd be shocked how long the body can keep going when you keep it in shape. The clock doesn't turn over on your 50th birthday and everything instantly fails unless you're a ham planet American
a good dicky can make men do unspeakable things
But what about the Lost of a dicky?
Imagine losing Sarah after getting shot
>btfos the troonyflies out of existence
Holy based
>30
>Make noise just to pick shit up off the floor
That's the power of a good night's sleep.