>talks constantly about waifumons in previous tweets >clearly constantly horny about mons >cries about mon not being a waifu or husbando
Yeah its just the design being bland guys.
The fact that it's not anything new or interesting is why it's lame.
Then again modern Game Freak can't do interesting designs either without making them incredibly fricking ugly so perhaps this is preferable.
Welcome to the new, inoffensive, non-binary, politically correct generation of pokemon. When you are so inclusive you dont need to have your pokemon reflect their character and archetype in the visual design
>When you are so inclusive you dont need to have your pokemon reflect their character and archetype
Pokemon looking like individuals of a species will always be better than them looking like cartoon characters with pre-defined personalities.
I have no idea what you mean. A lot of original designs had this unique underlying archetype you could infer. Which already told you a lot about a pokemon. Hell, whole backstories were made for some pokemon who never were in the ashnime, purely based on their design.
'
Not talking just about smolive. Most if not all current gen design are in the same vein.
Nothing wrong aiming at modern children and their preferences. But trying to be also a goody boy for twitter points is fricking disgrace.
>in the same vein.
Designs that can actually work as both genders instead of moronic? That's what pokemon should be aiming for.
And then you have the starters where you have a bawd cat and a homosexual duck.
I was sperging about it since dawn of the ages. If you have a pure male version of the pokemon, just have a pure female at the end of evo tree. Or just have one design with ratio. Dont do moronic shit that plagues rooster right now.
>giftmon gets a giftmon starter ratio >but as it's girly looking, this is bad
The other canons have not depicted one male Popplio/Brionne/Primarina however 9Same with Fennekin and its evos). You can sperg about game mechanics inserted to restrict free-breeding of rare 'mons. But please don't think that means the universe is full of male starters. Any breeder will tell you that's not a sustainable gender split for a healthy population and any cursory glance at the anime shows they very much portray the species' contrary to how they appear in the games at times.
Irrelevant outside of shitposting purposes. People push 87.5=100 because otherwise it literally means nothing different.
Its a nonsense ratio that wouldn't exist in nature outside of maybe some wackjob species where females are prone to killing male children.
Its solely there for some bizarre scarcity function that doesn't do fricking anything in context(oh no i can't trade dupes of my starters until i find a ditto) but gamefreak will continue it regardless.
That's because it's only really there to lock kids from doing it. Given they make the whole game for kids and do have an intended experience for them (regardless of adult desires to sequence break - SV's gyms having no scaling, indicating the intended route for kids in the victory road path), locking kids from freely breeding other starters (unless they lucked into a female straight off and didn't reset as "girls are yucky") until they encounter Ditto wherever GF decided to slot it in.
I mean sure it stops kids from doing that, but is it really anything notable as a result?
My point is that its entire purpose is fricking moronic, nothing is gained from locking kids from trading a copy of their starter or "rare event" to their friends.
Its meaningless as a concept, it sounds like its doing something but it pretty much isn't. Especially considering online and that "your progress" isn't generally going to be a direct analog to your friends progress.
Your shitter of a friend whose stuck on gym 2 isn't magically at endgame when you beat your game. Its massively niche and incredibly dumb.
Oh no, it doesn't pander to the moronic leaker; this is the greatest sin of SV. This is truely what kills SV for me.
This is probably what happened yeah, didn't he promote there being "three waifu plant mons" or some shit? I'm guessing he heard "Humanoid Plant" and thought that since most Pokemon under that categories are waifus it must be one as well.
I'd wager a few more of these cases will come and go as more concrete stuff comes up. Khu loves to say wrong shit early on.
Oh no, it doesn't pander to the moronic leaker; this is the greatest sin of SV. This is truely what kills SV for me.
This is probably what happened yeah, didn't he promote there being "three waifu plant mons" or some shit? I'm guessing he heard "Humanoid Plant" and thought that since most Pokemon under that categories are waifus it must be one as well.
I'd wager a few more of these cases will come and go as more concrete stuff comes up. Khu loves to say wrong shit early on.
He said Smolive is three stage and the middle evo isn't cumskull friendly (smolive --> evo), was it not? He was outright on the waifu train when talking about the frigging waifumons in the summer.
It's embarrassing to read how mindbroken this man is by cartoon porn, I still can't believe he posted that shit about Iono's (small, unremarkable) breasts without a shred of self-awareness
You say that like this some new design concept
I meant waifu-husbando part
He said it doesn't lean towards waifu or husbando though?
Literally
>I can't jerk off to this tree so it's bad!
Unrelated. He just doesn't like the design
>talks constantly about waifumons in previous tweets
>clearly constantly horny about mons
>cries about mon not being a waifu or husbando
Yeah its just the design being bland guys.
The fact that it's not anything new or interesting is why it's lame.
Then again modern Game Freak can't do interesting designs either without making them incredibly fricking ugly so perhaps this is preferable.
>humanoid
so it evolves into an olive dryad. sounds pretty neat i guess.
Welcome to the new, inoffensive, non-binary, politically correct generation of pokemon. When you are so inclusive you dont need to have your pokemon reflect their character and archetype in the visual design
>When you are so inclusive you dont need to have your pokemon reflect their character and archetype
Pokemon looking like individuals of a species will always be better than them looking like cartoon characters with pre-defined personalities.
I have no idea what you mean. A lot of original designs had this unique underlying archetype you could infer. Which already told you a lot about a pokemon. Hell, whole backstories were made for some pokemon who never were in the ashnime, purely based on their design.
>smolive's line is going from seed to a genderless tree
>this means it's an inoffensive, non-binary, politically correct generation of pokemon
'
Not talking just about smolive. Most if not all current gen design are in the same vein.
Nothing wrong aiming at modern children and their preferences. But trying to be also a goody boy for twitter points is fricking disgrace.
>in the same vein.
Designs that can actually work as both genders instead of moronic? That's what pokemon should be aiming for.
And then you have the starters where you have a bawd cat and a homosexual duck.
Explain to me what's supposed to be PC about Smolive's design.
>”modern children and their preferences”
meaning?
>pokemon who never were in the ashnime
???
wrong b***h
You'd still sperg about trannies if it was a feminine Pokemon while having a 50/50 gender ratio though. Look at the reaction to Primarina.
No, I'd sperg about inconsistency in the setting and design.
See Gardevoir and Galant. It just downright moronic.
Sure you would, anon. Sure. I look forward to your senseless troony-related ramblings after today's reveal.
I was sperging about it since dawn of the ages. If you have a pure male version of the pokemon, just have a pure female at the end of evo tree. Or just have one design with ratio. Dont do moronic shit that plagues rooster right now.
Primarina is 87.5% male. It's not a 50/50 split.
>giftmon gets a giftmon starter ratio
>but as it's girly looking, this is bad
The other canons have not depicted one male Popplio/Brionne/Primarina however 9Same with Fennekin and its evos). You can sperg about game mechanics inserted to restrict free-breeding of rare 'mons. But please don't think that means the universe is full of male starters. Any breeder will tell you that's not a sustainable gender split for a healthy population and any cursory glance at the anime shows they very much portray the species' contrary to how they appear in the games at times.
Irrelevant outside of shitposting purposes. People push 87.5=100 because otherwise it literally means nothing different.
Its a nonsense ratio that wouldn't exist in nature outside of maybe some wackjob species where females are prone to killing male children.
Its solely there for some bizarre scarcity function that doesn't do fricking anything in context(oh no i can't trade dupes of my starters until i find a ditto) but gamefreak will continue it regardless.
That's because it's only really there to lock kids from doing it. Given they make the whole game for kids and do have an intended experience for them (regardless of adult desires to sequence break - SV's gyms having no scaling, indicating the intended route for kids in the victory road path), locking kids from freely breeding other starters (unless they lucked into a female straight off and didn't reset as "girls are yucky") until they encounter Ditto wherever GF decided to slot it in.
I mean sure it stops kids from doing that, but is it really anything notable as a result?
My point is that its entire purpose is fricking moronic, nothing is gained from locking kids from trading a copy of their starter or "rare event" to their friends.
Its meaningless as a concept, it sounds like its doing something but it pretty much isn't. Especially considering online and that "your progress" isn't generally going to be a direct analog to your friends progress.
Your shitter of a friend whose stuck on gym 2 isn't magically at endgame when you beat your game. Its massively niche and incredibly dumb.
ah yes the olive tree pokemon, the harbinger of "political correctness"
do you ever get embarrassed being such a dumbfrick? because you really should
I see the rambling's already started.
Reminder he waited until now to say this because he's just the middle man only learning about it now too
Oh no, it doesn't pander to the moronic leaker; this is the greatest sin of SV. This is truely what kills SV for me.
This is probably what happened yeah, didn't he promote there being "three waifu plant mons" or some shit? I'm guessing he heard "Humanoid Plant" and thought that since most Pokemon under that categories are waifus it must be one as well.
I'd wager a few more of these cases will come and go as more concrete stuff comes up. Khu loves to say wrong shit early on.
He said Smolive is three stage and the middle evo isn't cumskull friendly (smolive --> evo), was it not? He was outright on the waifu train when talking about the frigging waifumons in the summer.
Damn, I was hoping it would be more Trevenant like.
>not a "frickable" cringe design
based, finally, we far lefts won 🙂
It's embarrassing to read how mindbroken this man is by cartoon porn, I still can't believe he posted that shit about Iono's (small, unremarkable) breasts without a shred of self-awareness