>AI art is a fun tool for people with no talent
Yes
>artists can use it to get better
Maybe
>artists will lose their job
Only the worst ones
>I'm going to get money
Nobody is going to pay you
>game companies will use it
No, because it can't be copyrighted
>AI can make games
Not right now, and there's no proof it will make good games
kys pajeet
I am a white, heterosexual, Irish male.
>irish
kys
do you have red hair? are you cute?
>Irish
>White
post hands or you are picrel forever
Hi Matt
So the pajeets of white people
If he was a pajeet he'd be saying artists are dead and that AI video games will save us
any and all shilling of ai art, good or bad, is a psyop by pajeets
it's afraid
>twitter
isn't that elon now?
He owns it. But IIRC he wants to pass it off to someone else.
What is it with Indian tech nerds and trying to destroy the world? They’re like the Lex Luthors of real life.
>>game companies will use it
>No, because it can't be copyrighted
And why not?
because naruto took a selfie
Look up the case where a monkey stole a camera and took a selfie. All the people tried to claim a copyright. It was settled by saying something along the lines of "Only humans can make material to be copyrighted" or.. something.
And that is relevant to a human claiming copyright to a picture how? Even if AI makes it, you can always just lie and claim you made it yourself and no one can prove otherwise.
So the entire art department is going to grind through a bunch of AI art, put it in the game, and everyone is going to say "OC donut steel"?
Yeah, if the end result is good enough - never ever underestimate the laziness of people. Especially if it's just some shit job for a crappy Ubisoft title and you're one dev in a mile-long credits list instead of some passion project.
>They can. AI image noise patterns are telltale.
Fair, but I doubt those would be impossible to obfuscate.
It can't be copyrighted, but that only means that it will not be responsible for the most important brand image resources like logos or cover art.
Image models can easily generate high resolution material textures from dirt over metal to skin, as well as particle effects or skyboxes etc etc. There's a lot of "brute" art in the background of your attention that nevertheless has to get nailed down well because you will immediately notice if textures look like washed out shit.
They can. AI image noise patterns are telltale.
once I get funding for my billion dollar tech startup that uses machine learning to detect machine learning you're frickin dead kiddo
>Stealing is illegal
>Not if you don't get caught!
Go look up the legal definition of stealing and try again, you silly goose.
>No, because it can't be copyrighted
I think they'll trace it and fix minor details and call it a day.
Ninão eterno.
>And that is relevant to a human claiming copyright to a picture how?
There was a case recently where someone made a children's book using AI art, I think AI to write the story too. It was claimed as not copyrightable because it wasn't made by a human.
>It was claimed as not copyrightable
fake news
No lol? He made a lot of money and made all you artcels have a nice days. India techbros always fricking win
Learn what copyright means Black person
It means he cannot sue if someone "steals" "his" book
It just means you can't copyright the image. You can use it, but if anybody else rips it and puts it in their game then you can't do shit. The gray area here is that it isn't explicitly public domain (yet) because some AI art contains traceable copyright material. Hypothetically, however, if you use a model and image database that contains no copyright, then it's effectively free game.
I used AI to make some backgrounds for my game using an image db is exclusively public domain stuff and it made shit in a very Amano style despite not using any of their work directly.
>you can always just lie
So there is proof. You homosexuals still think people can't tell the difference between real art and your stolen remixed garbage?
Bad analogy. AI is just a tool, like a camera. If a human uses it, I don't see why it shouldn't be copyrighted.
>Bad analogy
It's.. not an analogy. It's why you can't copyright stuff produced by an AI. Copyright laws are an absolute mess and need to be revised. Unfortunately the only people interested with copyright laws is Disney.
>AI is just a tool
A hammer is a tool. You don't insert a series of words and press a button in the hammer and builds a house.
Sounds like you use a shitty hammer
Seems so. Where can I get an AI hammer?
Didn't you know that various types of tools are used in different ways?
What is Case Law, Alex?
AI is a tool that, at the moment, just so happens to be unable to create images without a dataset composed entirely of copyrighted intellectual material. Remove the material, there is no content.
If content can only be created in the presence of copyrighted--illegal--material, then the resulting product logically also must be copyrighted by someone else, and therefore illegal.
>copywrited
Aren't most of the image sets taken from publicly available images, like shit people have posted on their DA or twitter? Who fricking cares if people use it for ai training, it's not like it's slapping a watermark over someone else's art and calling it your own.
>it's not like it's slapping a watermark over someone else's art and calling it your own.
That's exactly what AI artists do.
You can prompt an image, trace it adding minor modifications and copyright it. It is a clause that only applies to patent trolls, not to people that actually want to use the tool to make something that requires a minimum of effort.
Otherwise photographies wouldn’t be copyrighteable.
Complete nonsense argument that would only apply to monkeys using AI to make art and then humans trying to copyright that art.
hes moronic and clueless
AI has been used in production for at least 5 years already - you can look it up if you dont believe me
everything made within a company is ip of the company, doesn't matter if its generated
>he doesn't know
Panhandling scribble troons are unironically on suicide watch
the morons replying to it should've known better
This
There are plenty of ways of telling that it was made by an AI
And judging by those replies, they seem like teenage shitposters who don't know any better
or, know the lenghts of an AI-jeet would go, it's probably samegayging
Tbh it's not even artists who do most of the pant shitting here. It's people who've invested literally thousands of dollars on bad hentai commissions having serious sunk cost fallacy.
no, it's 100% artists. /ic/ is a hellhole of morons seething about AI
Doubt it, since everyone here seething about it is just bait aswell
tumblr, DA, and twitter "artists" aren't artists.
Ganker contrarians BTFO. Just shows you're all full of shit
one time on Ganker an anon shat on a literal photograph of an old woman, thinking it was AI
it was so funny
A few weeks ago in an AI art thread with movie thematic someone posted a collage of a real movie and an anon said that movies never looked like that
lmao
you've been saying this for at least a week but no one ever gives you a reply and it's such a moronic thing to say in the first place
take your fricking meds lol
Frick off, street shitter.
Where is her feminine benis?
>>game companies will use it
>No, because it can't be copyrighted
yeah moron, art in walls is the same as characters and presets
>no companies will use it
>companies use it
>uhhh i mean no companies will use it for X use case
moron
>muh steeeeeeeling
does that argument still get used these days?
Only by talentless hacks
What the frick is this "content creation is now accessible" thing about? Are there a bunch of people without arms now churning out images?
you don't need art skills to make art anymore, which makes the creation of art more accessible to the average person. It will become even more accessible as the tech advances
>anyone can make thousands of HQ images in a day when previously you could make 0
mediocre artists are shitting themselves that they will have to be creative and do something to differentiate themselves instead of drawing anime girl #23752794065 and drawing *that* portrait of Walter White in black and white.
I still don't understand how this shit is stealing. I'm a paid artist and an author. If this shit and that writing one are stealing from me, then I haven't seen it. My fricking bank balance is still the same frick all that it ever was. You know, cos i'm a fricking artist not a banker!
But anyway, isn't it no different than some other c**t just copying a style from his favourite artists while he learns to draw?
Hell, I legit "steal" more art when I'm photobashing for concepts!
it's different because the computer does it really fast lmao
they're seething because of how good it is more than anything
It's
1. People on twitter spreading around misinformation that the people using image to image function is how the AI generates all its art
2. People misunderstanding and spreading more misinformation that the AI is literally searching the internet for images to copy when you click generate
3. The few who actually understand how the training was done but still consider the learning stealing because "machine has no soul like humans"
Also, most models that people say that "spew the same image over and over" are mostly just overtrained so the model learns to do a specific thing instead of something like it.
>the AI is literally searching the internet for images to copy when you click generate
Oh yeah, you're right, the images were already preloaded into the AI beforehand. Big difference, for sure.
the model doesn't contain any image data
How do you train the AI? Where do you get the samples?
You feed it tagged images.
And where do those images come from?
Wherever you want.
>But anyway, isn't it no different than some other c**t just copying a style from his favourite artists while he learns to draw?
how i can tell youve never drawn anything in your life
I like using AI to generate images of little anime girls with flat chests and big foreheads.
>big foreheads
Based.
Thanks!
I didn't even have to try, "flat chest" and "cute tummy" automatically gave me nudes despite me not asking for it. Or maybe it was the squid part.
Is foreheads a e-girlcon fetish?
I think so.
Fuuuuck
Delete this!
No.
It's anal fetish. Means that e-girl is an ass bandit.
>filename
based, I love the waifu generator
Kind of wild you can put the word AI in a Ganker post and all of the beggars from the drawgay thread will skitter to it like a wienerroach picking a crumb up off the floor
meds schizo
Good morning, sirs
look at the filename, I wouldn't use a site to generate the good stuff either
I leave that stuff to the professionals.
I live in a non-Five Eyes country but yeah it's always better to be careful.
There will be no AI revolution that would truly equalize creation because all the tech bros behind the AI tools are just waiting to be bought by big IT corporations.
The tools are going to be free and easily accessible to public only until they have collected enough data and AI training for free. Only hope for commonly used AI will be if some idealistic schizo develops powerful open source AI tools out of goodness of his heart and gives them up to everyone for free.
i'm already tired of hearing about AI.
This kills the /ic/ poster.
how is this allowed i thought midjourney stopped sexualised art, cant we help get this banned too?
lol, did they lobotomise the image generation ai too? Can you not make sexy art anymore?
No, you can
>you now realize that by telling the AI to censor her breasts, the clothing is placed in such a way that she literally doesnt have nipples
it's the minor details that will always make human art better than AI shovelware
This kills the Onlyfans thot. Yes, they are AI made.
Take the AIpill.
>titty_squsih_via_too_small_bikini
I for one welcome our new AI coomer overlords
Want an asian gf? You got it.
It's hilarious seeing the ethots already seething at this.
What the frick is up with their eyelids and fingers?
Those hands look like they're from a corpse, those eyes look diseased, and those belly buttons look like ears.
You are pathetic in your seethecoping, man. Learn to plumb lmao.
I havent played with SD since 1.0 release, what are the models/addons/version to create things like this?
this aint allowed on midjourney also its always this same b***h come back when you can do night elfs
Seeing the recent reactions to these have me so perplexed because I saw stuff like this back in like September.
Normies are really going to shit bricks when they see what ATF has been doing.
how are they so perfect...
>onlyfans thots freaking out
>sides splitting from the sheer irony of trannies saying these aren't real girls
>streamer prostitutes getting deep FAKE'D
>"day in the life of (tech company) employee" getting laid off
Alright, this is great. So many onlyfans out there that are just softcore poses, this offers the same thing.
i mean it's ok to have shit taste, but this is borderline eldritch
You use those pictures to fap senpai, not to analyze every fricking pixel. You gay or something?
I for one find the girl shitting out an additional asscheek very erotic
Nothing 15 minutes in photoshop wouldn't fix
yea, but you dont know how to fix it, showing that you are indeed a talentless scam
its unhealthy to have this amount of cope, Anon
>no response
If you knew, you would have done it
So you are indeed a talentless hack incapable of anything.
Actually I learned to edit photos for a job in a weekend a couple of years back and learned to paint digitally as a hobby. I'm learning how to use AI to render in-between frames for animations for a pet project of mine. Cope
everyone can larp on the internet, including you pajeet. I'm also the CEO of google
You're not going to be much of an anything if your greatest skill is coping this hard.
half assing content awareness doesn't make you a ps master, sanjeet
you need to learn how to use photoshop first, rasheed
>Took more time to find the errors in the image than it take to generate.
and then they think they're making a point lmao
LOL
boobs too big 0/10
prompt?
you'll never get rich scamming morons on the internet, pajeet
What?
>prompt
parameters
,(realistic:1.5),photorealistic, octane render,(hyperrealistic:1.2),thick thighs,wide hips,huge thighs,standing,dynamic pose,(white skinned:1.4), (skindentation:1.1),(photorealistic face:1.2),(1girl:1.4),(gigantic breasts:1.6),thick eyelashes,long eyelashes,yellow hair,hair ribbon,arm straps,choker,(skindentation:1.3),(green leather armour:1.6),best quality, 1girl, (street:1.3),outdoors,(beach:1.2),dynamic pose,multicolored hair,streaked hair,hair ribbon,hair band, smile,parted lips,looking at viewer,sharp focus,(8k), (4k), (Masterpiece), (Best Quality), fantasy, extremely detailed, intricate, hyper detailed, (perfect face), illustration,soft lighting,(specular lighting:1.4),blue eyes,short hair, sweat,dripping juices, squirting (elf:1.4),armor waist
Negative prompt: (bad-artist:1.0), (e-girl:1.2), (worst quality, low quality:1.4), (bad_prompt_version2:0.8), bad-hands-5
Steps: 45, Sampler: DPM++ 2M Karras, CFG scale: 8, Seed: 2395125603, Size: 512x768, Model hash: 35d51ba12c, Model: kotosAbyssproto_kotosabyssprotov1, Denoising strength: 0.6, Clip skip: 2, ENSD: 31337, Hires upscale: 2.5, Hires upscaler: Latent (bicubic)
I can't wait for the day onlyfans prostitutes and instagram bawds lose their paying base.
Is she *licks lips* anatomically accurate?
I can't get into AI art since I can always spot shit like this.
But also, AI art generally produces really generic-looking stuff. Something always seems off about it, like you're looking at a Chinese knock-off, and it makes me feel uncomfortable. It's the same feeling I get looking at Genshin Impact. There's something eerily artificial about it, like it was designed by a committee - or robot, which is the same thing. I guess this might be where the "soul/soulless" meme comes from.
no anon, genshin impact is not ai generated
give up
It's not AI generated, it's bugman generated, which is basically the same thing.
This has serious consequences no doubt
roasties thought they survived the culling after MMD
they got it wrong the culling had not yet begun.
on a rather related note I have no false notions about the fact that I may very get replaced by what amounts to suped up roomba and come back here to post Kaczynski memes
Where do you get these generated ?
I would also like to know. Midjourney maybe?
Although I heard they don't allow NSFW.
search stable diffusion in Ganker or almos any other board, there is always a step in step tutorial on how to install it on you pc.
I find in this comment a unbased acccusation
>in Ganker
And why aren't you there instead of shitting up the board with offtopic trash?
I followed the /h/ guide to use the novelAI leak and the webui was slightly different than what was described, and the generated images weren't quite right.
Novel AI leak tutorial is a very specific combination of prompts, model, vaes and other parameters.
look in Ganker under
>local install
>voldy guide
It seems a bit much but you will be done between in 30 mins if everything goes to plan.
>the generated images weren't quite right.
This is probably because the model you are using is not the same as the one used on previews, the novelai leak is several months old now.
pick a model you like from civitai when you are done installing stable diffusion.
While some models are specialized, most can do a bit of everything depending on their training, for eg, this image uses the same model as the elf image.
Negative promps are as importan as positive ones, without them the model will ouput way worse results.
>Negative promps are as importan as positive ones, without them the model will ouput way worse results.
That's not true at all. You can create absolute kino with zero or very few negative prompts. And yet you can't really create anything nice and consistent with just negative prompts. Probably?
>You can create absolute kino with zero or very few negative prompts
Of course, but with negative prompts you can steer the model away from what you dont want generated, im just mentioning that negative prompts is a important tool to generate good images, even if its not technically needed.
>you can't really create anything nice and consistent with just negative prompts. Probably?
Ill try this when im bored, negative only could be a fun challenge
case in poinyt, the same elf image
without the negative prompts:
Can't believe it's AI art that's making us come back to good shaders man. I can't wait until single solo projects, we're finally going to truly return back to fantasy.
TODAY I WILL REMIND THEM
https://rule34.paheal.net/post/view/2765614#search=Kaine%20animated
why do you keep posting this webm? Remind whom of what?
how did you generate this?
How did the AI learn about that dress?
By rounding up artists and executing them with a firing squad
God this is so sex.
I LOVE KAINE SO MUCH IT'S UNREAL
Puffy vulva
Anon..
>he doesn't know
If you want a game made with AI then check out Bearverse.
https://twitter.com/BearverseGame
But this isn't a gay bear porn game, how lame.
Wow, this game looks cool. And it has NFT support too? Neat.
Come to the Stable Diffusion generals on Ganker if you want to see cool AI art.
You can also check out Bearverse, its a cool game being worked on that uses AI generated art.
What if AI-generated NFT games?
Check out Bearverse bro
>"People" find AI art appealing
How fricking high on the "succesfully subverted" by ((Them)) scale do you have to be, to NOT find AI art repulsive to look at?
Found it disgusting to look at before i even knew that those pictures were AI drawings
And no surprise the biggest pushers are street shitting subhummans
People would freely give away their ability to profit off of their own ingenuity and creativity if it means access to the illusion of being able to circumvent hard work and talent to create a facsimile of the benefits actual work would've entailed. It's like drinking 100% ultra-pure fresh, cold water.
>t.
Panhandling scribble troons are unironically on suicide watch
>Only the worst ones
When has that been the case? It's gonna be used to drive down wages, not a way to filter out mediocre artists.
When was the last time Automata or Replicant went on sale on steam?
seethe troony
>The more ai art gets generated the more in becomes part of its own art stealing algorithm
>ai art becomes more and more derivative and homogenized
>art basically becomes cal arts
>Here's the same fixed pose, glassy doll eyes, Korean pig dog half anime style. staring at the viewer, zero fricking character flavour slapped together
epic art ai bros
>AI art is ba- *ACK*
Cute elf.
Even me, an artlet that can't into anatomy, would feel dirty using AI to even asist my process
Should I assume that "AI artists" are worse than me?
d
so if an artist posted pictures of that quality with issues at that calibre you'd say they were a poor artist?
bro
yeah, such as a pentablet and drawing software
whatever pajeets use is just a collage maker that can blend the parts together, but still makes a lot of mistakes
I'm trying to beat off to e-girls being hanged and raped, I'm sorry I didn't catch all the mistakes, anon.
not chastising you, I could waste an hour finding glitches
how did you miss the background lady not having a neck
she's wearing a chokerthat is hard to see because of the black background behind her.
i hate that you Black folk never make cool wallpapers with this stuff.
make it yourself you useless fricker
i did you useless porch monkey
website?
Good enough for me 😉
>implying that 70% of coomer art drawn by humans wasn't already that bland and formulaic
And it's a shit ton better then most of the garbage that modern day "artists" shit out
Cope hard
can AI make dynamic posing and such? telling apart AI prompts is getting easier by the day due the lack of pose diversity
machine learning is just a weighted graph so its attempts at dynamic poses look like body horror
it's the same reason it will never be good at hands
yeah, that's why most prompters only post the results where the model hide the hands
funniest part is, someone was posting a 6 fingered AI girl, and when it got pointed out, wienery as hell posted his fix "literally 5 seconds with content awareness". but the garbage deleted the wrong finger.
anyway, the fad doesn't have much time left, they need money for the falafels
>"literally 5 seconds with content awareness". but the garbage deleted the wrong finger.
Holy shit
This post makes no sense. It's like me saying humans are just atoms, therefore walking isn't possible. Those "weighted graphs" can model any multidimensional function. All patterns you see in reality can be expressed as math, especially the physiology of the human body.
and how many terabytes of VRAM are you going to need to do it
For something as easy as hands, less than 4GB as that's already been fixed a little while ago. For dynamic poses it needs training on descriptively labeled examples. Clearly it's lacking due to the fact that the anime models were fine tuned on boorus with basic tagging.
>that's already been fixed
lmao
>n-no it's just the dataset
lmfao
Call me when it can do cute feet.
>>game companies will use it
>No, because it can't be copyrighted
couldn't a company just use ai to create art and then make up a fake artist or choose someone who worked on the game and say they made it?
Can confirm, people way overestimate what ai can do
Real talk: who else is jerking off to AI generated e-girl stuff like crazy since it's become good like 6 weeks ago?
Pixiv is a godsend for that shit
What is that, midjourney?
This shit is still magic for me. Its like seeing 3D games for the first time. I still dont fully understand how this frickign sample program can
>make perfect skin
>perfect lighting
>breasts getting pushed in by clothing
>literally tanlines
How the FRICK are we not gonna go full scifi in the next 10 years?
The basic explanation:
There are perceptrons a lot of neurons that decide what to do(e.g. value 1 input -> output 1, value != 1 input -> 0 output). In image generation/alteration they usually decide output color of current pixel depending on it's position on canvas and colors of surrounding pixels(when generating image they also use value associated with word from description as an additional input). The process goes the same way human draws, first layer of neurons draws a general draft(though unlike human art it is already colored), passes it to the second layer that adds details, then to third that adds shadows etc. In the end you get a picture. Process of teaching an ai, when you feed it data basically adjusts weighting of those neurons, so that neuron that say wants to draw white pixel in the top middle of the picture, with all surrounding neurons being white and prompted phrase "blonde" is chosen more often than the one that wants to draw black pixel there
Yeah, but the posing, the style, even the entire composition is reaching the point where its indistinguishable from human art.
The final push is a very hard one. Eyes/hands/general number of limbs will be way harder to overcome than posture, style and composition, because adjusting weight to much will "overtrain" ai, so that it can only produce things rather simmilar to fed data, and not adjusting them enough will lead to all those problematic pictures where you have too much fingers/dislocated fingers/fingers starting from each other and other monstrosities. Problem here is that ai has no awarenes of what it is drawing, it just shades pixels based on inputs
Honestly as a toy I think it's fun to see what it can generate. What is sad is people wanting to push AI into everything art. And yeah, there'll always be someone pushing their own ideals onto the world but why specifically one of the things that's closer to an expression of the self. Like every good idea, it will be corrupted by incessant greed.
What's funny is that prompters think they are artists.
>the same homosexual spamming his deformed elves
>the same shilling of the NFT bear game
>the same ESL posts angry at artists or humans in general
The first is already a no. Most concept artists are the ones using it first to know what the designers want in order to go from there. Only indie devs would use it as actual concept art.
I made a Patreon with AI generated porn and it makes decent money. But the funniest shit is all these Twitter artists, I keep getting death threats and spam from these people lol. It’s like some artists union who want to break your legs except they’re all just keyboard warriors.
>>I'm going to get money
>Nobody is going to pay you
There are AI art Twitters that have a Patreon and the most I have seen is $580 a month lmao. So you're wrong
all ai art is human art you gombeens. a human being has at bare minimum curated it and picked an output he likes. in more extreme cases images have been inpainted over and over and over fixing strange little errors. the way the average person thinks about art is so fricking moronic and simplistic it's painful.
it's really not
art is about output, not input, people that commission other artists (or in this case, feed their idea to an AI) and idea guys in general aren't artists
I completely agree with you about someone using AI to create images not being an artist, but I think the images being created are still art. Not good art mind you, or worthwhile art, but art nonetheless.
i mean yeah they are art
my problem with AI art isn't even that it's bad (it still feels off to me, but it's easy to ignore), it's that it's really no different from asking another artist to draw something for you
which isn't a bad thing really it's that there's what essentially is a free good artist that will draw what you ask it to whenever you want (minus changing intricacies but that's besides the point)
but it's still like a "middleman" between what i have in my mind and what ends in the paper, the only thing that will ever have direct connection to my brain is my own hands
that's just how i see it, i can't honestly call someone that tells someone or something else to draw for them an artist
the AI is the artist, not the "commissioner" for it
>it still feels off to me, but it's easy to ignore
Messed up eyes, nipples, hands, abdomens, and legs are easy for you to ignore?
when i'm horny, yes
>which isn't a bad thing really it's that there's what
which isn't a bad thing really, there's
well, i mean it's still impressive and technically way better than anything i will ever draw probably
you're literally the guy in philosophy 101 making everyone cringe. you don't know anything about art. shut the frick up and go fricking read 2000 books and come back you actual moron.
>go conform to the majority opinion
no
>majority opinion
go learn the history of the debate you fricking spastic. READ A FRICKING BOOK.
The whole reason why the stable diffusion algorithm became so good is because training is 100% automated. You add some noise to anime tiddy and it tries to recover the original based on noisy image and text metadata. It then compares it with source and rates it. It's simply an image recovery algorithm.
"Drawing" is just an edge case with 100% noise, where it relies on metadata prompt.
It's a ridiculously simple idea and has a long way to go to be able to draw properly. It doesn't know what composition and amatomy is and the result is pure guesswork. It doesn't know why human hand should have 5 fingers, but tree can have any amount of branches. Fixing that is curently means purely brutforcing with more learning. We need more advanced stuff.
Wow those sure are cute airbrushed anime women in 3/4 view
Google, Meta, and the like are already researching how to watermark AI images so you'll be stuck using the Linux equivalent to make squiggly e-girl art
Oh no I will have to use the superior alternative. The horror.
the most popular medium is already the open source stable diffusion you fricking moron lmao
Have fun prooomtping for hours when meta is generating animations in seconds, and this is just what they've publicly released
You Black folk have no clue how advanced high tier AI is while you'll still be playing with Dall-E Mini
you have to be an actual NPC to enjoy AI art
>mfw selling my ai generated garrysmod and roblox scripts
>already made 1000$
tick tock programming sissies
>java dev in a bank
Mate I have more than 20 years of tech debt in company projects, and I asure you no fricking ai will be able to maintain that legacy shit for the next 100 years
How do I get an AI to draw me lewd art?
This is important
Prompt lewd or exactly what you want to see?
Something that won't give me an error when it needs to draw a nipple I guess.
Here's an easy way:
https://waifus.nemusona.com/
It has some limitations, but you can just slap in something like "masterpiece, detailed, 1girl, (insert fetishes here)" and get some wank material real quick.
>hair melting into her clothes
>deformed eye on the right
Can this one make specific characters? It just seems to use the same generic anime girl with different features. I'm not sure how AJ works but I believe this means it needs to use a different model(?). There's an AI thread on /e/ with a bunch of links I've been meaning to check out for a while. I'd rather just make them on my own PC.
Its the Anything V4 model, so yes it can. But it might not recognize some more obscure characters.
haha vidya game
for the love of god almighty, post a catbox link for full
I am sorry anon that's full already, dick went wrong too many times with ai so I just put penis in the negative prompt (which came out as e-girl most of time)
thanks for letting me know
i gotta gear my brain to ignore the extra limbs this ai machine wants to give these characters
it weirds me out so much
This is just people being lazy, stuff like that takes less than 5 minutes to fix.
It's that if something takes 10 seconds to generate why would you spend 5 minutes on it. It's fricking funny how people critique it.
5 minutes assumes shit pc and too stupid to use mspaint. I could probably fix it in about a minute.
But to answer your question; why not? A better image is a better image and the investment is still essentially nil. Takes less effort to make a minor correction then to keep spinning the wheel hoping you’ll luck into coherency.
Not everyone gives a frick about small errors, it's just art. Logically it makes very little sense to make "better" images to post once and never again. Some people do but most don't really care.
>99% of the image is good but...
Who cares really?
Soulless people obviously dont care because they are used to eating shit and having no standards
Most art has "errors", it's just art. You're the only soulless person here thinking it's supposed to be 1:1 true to your bias.
>its supposed to be shit
truly a scam artist rethoric
Keep crying.
>no argument
AItards in fricking shambles
>If it's not 100% good it's shit
You're like a child having a tantrum
If I show you a Greek statue with no arms would you say it's shit?
Not EVEN remotely comparable to your moronic shit. Go find another strawman
keep crying about your trash and full of imperfections "art" that you certainly didnt worked for
>you are wrong because... you just are ok!?
if you had an argument you could pretend you were right.
right now, you are just crying
Mean to
I care, clearly the anon who circled it cares.
If your engagement is purely disposable then I’m unlikely to ever get you to care but I find reward in improving pieces.
You don't care, you're just trying to stay mad and feel like you've one up your enemies like spastic fricks. Even if something is absolutely perfect or even drawn by a person you'll still sperg out and ""critique"" it.
>Not everyone gives a frick about small errors
Black folk aren't everyone. Actual people wants the image of god, a perfect being. It's literally how humanity worked since day one.
AI artists have more followers than you.
>AI artists have more followers than you.
Because you'll be refreshing for a new image over 5 mins longer trying to find something "good enough" verse fixing something "good enough" into something actually good in less that time if you actually had a soul to do it yourself.
>maybe if I make some shit story up .. uh... yeah gotem
lol
>negative prompts
>"penis"
I want to put my penis into Anubia's vegana
>Too many being generated atm. High chance of it timing out.
Bros...
>waifus
god I hate these people
you're going to have to run a non lobotomized version locally
idk what that means but point me in the right direction and Ill figure it out
https://rentry.org/sdg-link#local-install
>implying
anon please you think I'm doing THIS for $$$,it's literally a true return to classic art m8
well you can't really do it for money since ai art has no value
potion seller cat in the top right
This is going to turn lewd art into fricking TikTok tier oversaturation
I'm already getting sick of the amount of lightly lewd Vaseline skin anime girls getting posted
the first person to make serious money off AI art is gonna be the first person to properly pack the prompting process into a slot machine/gacha. that's what it feels like, just constantly hitting generate over and over again. just gamify it, give you rewards for prompting over and over again and charge for 20 spins or whatever and you'll be a multi-millionaire.
only if they add randomized voice with lines, lore and live 2d
Why are these threads created everyday and on Ganker of all places? like why do you NEED to sell people on AI?
The thread was made by someone shitting on AI art ESL-san.
Ganker pajeets like spamming the same shit on multiple boards.
Ganker is borderline unusable now because of it.
For real?
NTA but yeah.
Ganker was already a shitshow with all the CONSOOMING generals, but now it's attracted a slew of midwits that think that "AI" is anything but a marketing term. And like with Ganker they can't stop spamming useless threads.
Ironically the board most keeping up with ai tech as far as imagegen goes is /h/
"Ironically"? The primary determining factor for whether a new technology takes off is how easily it can be used for porn. That's how photography, cinema and the internet rose to prominence in their times, and why people are still iffy on VR, because VR porn is shit at the moment. The people who care most about AI art being the people who just want to use it to fap is only natural.
>how easily it can be used for porn
How was the internal combustion engine used for porn?
it was used to pump and dump(water mostly)
>Ganker was already a shitshow with all the CONSOOMING generals, but now it's attracted a slew of midwits that think that "AI" is anything but a marketing term.
Something about that seems really sad especially knowing really tech guys probably want to talk about something else
AI posters are like bronies. They want everyone to see their garbage.
If only it was 2008 moot would have mass ban all of these homosexuals off the site months ago.
sell? I just like the idea of having my own personal AI drawgay to make whatever stupid idea I think of regardless of flaws
God I fricking hate this b***h so much.
Then I saw that one video. Just has this disgusted look on her face like she's ashamed of some guy fricking her in the ass because she's a "freak". But you can tell by the way her little dick getting harder and harder that she's enjoying it. Then at the end she starts leaking precum, tilts her head back, spreads her legs even wider and just gives into the lust.
>Then I saw that one video
That's fricking bullshit, no such thing was ever made. It doesn't exist.
Where’s the penis?
>the same birth defect anime elves
>the same frog posts
>the same blonde bimbos with wonky eye and extra fingers
So how does one do full one uoooh stuff? Do they censor it being able to work?
art sisters...i think i'm gonna have to ACK myself...
wow, op is right sometimes
These threads are the same thing over and over again, I'm sure they're made by a bot at this point
AI will not replace actual artists because the actual advantage of learning art (or any creative skill) isn't just to spit out a pretty looking picture, it's the ability to create whatever you want exactly the way you want it. You can't do that with AI because AI can only create things based on what other people have created. The AI may be able to create a character, but it can't consistently portray this same character with different expressions, different perspective, different interactions with other objects, etc. without source material to do it. This makes the AI functionally worthless for most actual professional endeavors where you will have a client that wants to make modifications to whatever you make, or where you will have to make modifications for your own work
I can see AI art being useful for making some portraits for a few games (like RPGs that don't use much art) , some backgrounds for games that have static backgrounds (like VNs) but that's pretty much it. It's mostly just a toy. There may be a time where the AI is smart enough to make creative decisions like above, but at that point the AI would be so advanced it could functionally replace anyone, including programmers
honestly i could see AI being useful in making textures or in doing photoshop shenanigans
It already makes production ready PBR materials. This shit gonna be very useful.
AI will objectively replace artists because it's being made to automate everything we can do.
No one will make models by hand when AIs can do it literally 20,000 times faster than you by just giving it an image. An image you prompted and came out 20,000 times faster than if you drew it. Then you will tell an AI how to animate that character, how to voice that character, how that character should act, and you'll tell it to write up a backstory for it too, based on what they look like. And eventually it will write up code to string all this into a video game.
If you don' think all of this is coming you are literally mentally moronic because there is evidence of it all over the place. You have no concept of what's coming, you're seriously ignorant.
>No one will make models by hand when AIs can do it literally 20,000 times faster than you by just giving it an image
You don't need ai for that. Didnt read the rest
You are incredibly ignorant.
This is useless if the art isn't made for profit, idiot. No one cares about time, most people actively want time to waste to ignore how much freedom they have.
It will not only replace artists, AI will replace too many jobs for the gobbament to not push through universal basic income because most people won't have any noteworthy work to do anymore. You will live in your 5 minute city pod and eat your insect cereal
It will not, and you have 0 idea what people do in professions that you think ai will replace
WAKE
UP
>Nobody is going to pay you
Too late. They paid me
For what
CP
AI shit threads are all the same scripted posts.
https://desuarchive.org/g/thread/91179791/
https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/414240267/
https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/414210371/#414210371
https://desuarchive.org/g/thread/91152485/#91156253
The AI threads are made by an AI
all me btw
All of those were made by AI? what the frick? now real women will lose their onylfans job?
With the voice AI shit that just went viral? Yes. Absolutely.
Here, you can add this one to the list
https://arch.b4k.co/v/thread/625971695/
>in 2030 Ganker you will just have to type in a description of the reaction image you want and it will autoamtically generated with whatever character you want
>How to destroy YouTubes algorithm with AI
Kinda based
Why do people write long posts when they have no clue what they're talking about? Do we have actual redditors posting here?
AI is literally the most overhyped meme field in tech
I saw you ai Black folk make these same exact posts in non-tech and non-media related boards. Frick off already.
Draw a Venn diagram of the people seething about Stable Diffusion, that new AI voice generator, and "coomer" content and you'll get a single circle.
These threads literally are made by an AI, it’s the same posts over and over too
>it’s the same posts over and over
So how long has Ganker been infected with AI bots? Since the very beginning?
>six months of this same shit
People always talk about the massive improvements yet i dont see anything from the past 4 months. Yes AI art made a massive leap with OpenAI and its Dall-E but thats about it.
I only have an AMD gpu. What version of linux should I install to play around with this AI shit?
>completely ruining the face by making it utterly generic Korean MMO garbage
How disappointing.
>another image generator thread with weird looking elves and melty catgirls along with "you're a seething twittergay if you don't like this" posts
These threads are made by bots, aren't they?
>These threads are made by bots, aren't they?
There are three AI art threads on Ganker right now. what do you think?
>These threads are made by bots, aren't they?
Yeah, everything that's not eceleb bait is a bot. You've cracked the code.
>No, because it can't be copyrighted
This Black person thinks money can't change the law lmao
With all the AI tools that came up recently, is this the perfect time to learn to code and make your own videogame?
It has been the perfect time for a while now
The perfect time is always right this very second. The longer you leave it, the worse it gets. Every time you put it off for a month, you're a month further behind on making your dream game.
This. listening to this man
THE TIME IS NOW, YOU HAVE TO FIGHT FOR THINGS YOU BELIEVE NOWWWWW
REMEMBER RIGHT NOWWW IS THE TIME TO STAND UP AND START DOING WHAT YOU LOVE AND WANT TO SEE
caps*
My genuine worry is, when ai generated images become better, how are we going to know what is fake or not? I just feel like some future president is going to lose an election because someone will create a real enough image of them raping a chick or show a fake ancestor holding slaves
>how are we going to know what is fake or not?
Considering artists are literally being banned cause their art 'looks like AI art' it's already happening.
If it's so good that you can't tell the difference then why are you worried?
because it's disingenuous soulless trash, no different than a happy meal from macslop
This is a good thing. People will naturally become skeptical of literally every digital image on the internet and all these stupid witch hunts of twitter warriors trying to cancel people over dumb shit they said 10 years ago will become a thing of the past
>because someone will create a real enough image of them raping a chick or show a fake ancestor holding slaves
Doesn't make sense, the proof is if it existed after AI shit started it's fake. It's that obvious, moron.
bot thread
bot post
AI art inherently has no value because no effort went into its creation and it can be created at a whim. this is basic supply and demand.
this will only be exacerbated when white collar work gets automated and people retreat into hobbies.
ai art is only capable of creating these dime a dozen anime girl pinups currently being spammed by pajeets on every art site. idk why you Black folk keep posting this and expect me to be impressed.
it can create anything
except hands or eyes that don't look fricked up apparently
your soulless cherrypicked ai trash sure btfo me anon
The FFTgay has dozens of images with normal hands
if you generate enough anime girl pinups surely a few of them will have normal hands by chance
So you are saying that AI can in fact create hands?
are you seriously debating me off a joke i made? yes, ai can sometimes create hands. most of them look fricked up, and the only thing it's used to create seemingly is anime girl pinups, and they all look soulless and shit. there you go, i hope you understand now.
why are you so crabby? did you not get enough sleep?
>that doesn't count, because... it just doesn't ok!?
I know anon, I know.
>left leg index finger
>left hand index and middle fingers
>towel melts into a swimsuit
>right shoulder visibly longer than left one
dont feed anon
Make it create exactly one character in different poses with different expressions with no visible defects It is probably possible, but will take way more time than it will take for semi-good artist to draw char instead
>it can create anything
Then why do we always see the same type of images in these threads?
Because you're on Ganker.
The past week people have been arguing passionately in regards to those 3D thots created by AI.
>there is no way this is AI art!!!
Your argument is dumb and you know you're wrong about it.
I acknowledge that AI can generate good looking results, that sometimes do not have serious visible defects. However I once again ask you to pick any ai generated picture you see, maybe even from this thread, or generate it and alter it in any way, so that character stays the same. Move a hand? Change posture? Have charcter stand on a different background? Hold something in it's hand? Have a different dress? Hair color? Possibilities are limitless
Not sure what you want or why, so do it yourself and show me.
https://waifus.nemusona.com/
>art is art I don't like!!! let me ignore the good parts and zoom in on the bad parts, that'll get him
You gonna be okay lmao
Because popular generic content is popular. It’s the same reason 90% of booru content is samey; creativity isn’t rewarded and people’s tastes aren’t as interesting as they’d like to think.
>its your daily AIshill thread all over again
>with morons spamming the same trash "art" all over again
>with the same moronic bot arguments, all over again
>And its going to get archived, again
What the frick do you know? Why should anyone listen to you or care about what you say?
Just watch this on the side
Instead of browsing this worthless thread.
This post will age like milk in less than one year.
Who are you arguing with? Why are you seething over an imaginary person?
Imagine being an artist or woman and being accused of being ai generated when you post your pictures.
Why're these threads always filled with people who actively want artists to die out? What form of autism is this
They weren't initially, until the near violent reaction from said "artists" attacking everyone for daring to use it.
Imagine the asspain if the current lawsuits get thrown out.
Is there a more useless group of "people" in all of human history than artists? I really can't think of a "profession" with a greater imagined to actual importance ratio. I'm glad you're being replaced. Go get a real job. I'll take my burger with extra pickles and make it snappy
>All mutts can think of is diabetes food.
I hate Americans
Stay mad brown troon lmao
Stop talking to yourself.
I got bored of ai art after 2 weeks and really dont get the appeal of it. It does its own art and you merely guide it with a prompt. In word you will never get exactly what you want.
I've seen some artists of varying skill sketching out poses etc. while having the AI fill in the gaps or backgrounds. Even an extremely rough sketch to guide the AI seems to work much better than trusting the AI to know what you want to create from nothing.
AI art is fun and no amount of drawgay kvetching can change it
I, for one, welcome our new AI overlords
>try to make some AI generated art that would interest me
>oneshota cowgirl mature woman straddling age difference size difference height difference
>get a e-girl with her legs spread
It needs more time in the oven. Call me in a few years when it's capable of something better.
skill issue
I want to toy with it to make some concept art for my gamedev. Whats a good free one to try?
lurk more
breasts too large
thighs too thick
ears too pointy
Poster too gay.
imagine having e-girl vampire smug gf...
I'm a damned lazy adult, playing video games all day, when I could be working.
Need correction from a smug e-girl vampire gf
isis bros
How dare you? Delete that you degenerate, unless Allah shall judge you in Hell with Shaytan!
AI coming for the creative industry really did blindside people, or at least I don't remember anyone predicting it. We all grew up thinking it would be labor first, but in hindsight it makes a lot more sense that AI would have its start in art.
The voice acting AI is nutty too.
people have been replaced by machines in labor for decades, now artists are feeling what someone 50 years ago would have felt when they lost their job to a robot
What model are you or others using for these realistic people?
https://majinai.art/index.php
Yooo thanks man
np, open the pngs with the png button and just drag those in for convenience.
it's always stable diffsuion
>No, because it can't be copyrighted
People use public domain art and music in commercial games.
>Not right now, and there's no proof it will make good games
I suspect it will, but it will certainly prove useful as an aid to solo and indie developers who don't have enough money to spend on artists and musicians. Especially freeware developers.
>No, because it can't be copyrighted
lol if you actually think this. They'll use proprietary models if they have to
>Only the worst ones
Again, lol. You're looking at the technology right now and not thinking about 10 years from now.
Even good software developers will have their jobs taken by AI soon enough
>Nobody is going to pay you
Many AI frontends are currently getting VC funded, many are AI frontends already have customers. You have no idea what you're talking about
have a nice day ai npcs
AI is doomed to failure in art because AI cannot think up new ideas, it can only use other art it was trained on to draw.
moron
Tell me a new idea
Most wasted tech ever in history. Even nukes are redeemable because when we can reuse spent waste as more energy it can easy the pain of all these bombs everywhere.
AI literally only exist now to ruin humanity. All because homosexuals with no souls abused it.
>Ganker was founded for the discussion of art (manga and anime)
>Ganker now hates artists
when did the timeline shift
Um, excuse me, chud. Ganker was founded so I can show everyone what a pretty and valid woman I am.
Clocking an AI image is like clocking a troony, they're both ugly and obvious
I don't care that they're being made, I care that people keep claiming they look good or unique, unlike voice AI where it's 99% just jokes
This shit just takes existing images and makes them worse.
All of you will be replaced by robots
It is inevitable
Ask an AIgay their prompts and see how fast they recoil.
Unironically, what did he mean by this
>they are already recoiling at the thought
lmao
I don't get it, what's bad about the prompts?
As far as I can tell he thinks prompters are ashamed that their outputs aren't 1:1 with the prompt even though that's not true, it's basically his attempt to fabricate a sick burn
Training. It's an AI.
>Training. It's an AI.
But, did it invent that dress as an amalgam of different sexy dresses, or was there a similar dress that was used train the model?
the AI general in Ganker is filled with prompts
Anon, AItards are literally watermarking the images and refusing to share the texts
lmao
>Gankergays don't exist if I close my eyes
Watermarking is so people know where to find more when people repost your stuff, it's not somehow blocking prompt sharing.
https://civitai.com/models/5344/kaine-nier-replicant-lora and AOM2
They scraped Danbooru images that come with tags and made a model of it. So when you prompt "Kaine" you will get Kaine regardless of the model. You can prompt her in 2D, 3D, or anything in between.
>Kaine
I see.
I'm literally in one of the 3 AI generals in Ganker as of RIGHT NOW, and people are sharing their prompts, the frick are you on son?
>and people are sharing their prompts
>goes to Ganker
>no one is actually sharing their prompts, or settings, or models
HAHAHAHA WHAT A LYING Black person
the prompts are literally in the filenames, are you a phoneposter?
>he doesn't have the prompt sharing extension
ngmi
Ask an AIgay what the rankings of AI are in Pixiv and see how fast they recoil.
Is this the result of an entire generation not being taught to read in school? what happened to obligatory readings of 1984, Brave New World and Catcher in the Rye? do all of you revel at the thought of being slaves?
Is THIS the modern, 21st century man?
>s-stop having fun with ai art!!!! this is a dystopia!!!!!! havent you read these books that dont even mention AI?????
I never said any of those things
read a book, moron
>I NEVER MENTIONED AI WHEN I KVETCHED IN AN AI THREAD
Again, I never said that
please take your medication
copyrigth should be abolished and is a bligth upon society
>have fun with silly image generator
>mentally ill gang of artists and anti-AI squad on twitter wants to kill me
your "silly image generator" is being used for nefarious ends like masking child pornography and con schemes
it's like saying drugs are harmless
I got an idea for a new anime plot
Is it me fapping to that picture for a week straight?
Just make it yourself my man:
kotosAbyssproto_kotosabyssprotov1.safetensors
anything v3.0 vae
hades-8500 textual inversion
parameters
(realistic:1.5),photorealistic, octane render,(hyperrealistic:1.2),thick thighs,wide hips,huge thighs,standing,dynamic pose,(dark skinned:1.4), (pink legwear:1.3), thigh highs,(skindentation:1.3),(photorealistic face:1.2),(1girl:1.4),(gigantic breasts:1.6),thick eyelashes,long eyelashes,pink hair,hair ribbon,arm straps,choker,(skindentation:1.3),(denim short shorts,white tankini:1.3),best quality, 1girl, (street:1.3),outdoors,(beach:1.2),dynamic pose,multicolored hair,streaked hair,hair ribbon,hair band, smile,parted lips,looking at viewer,sharp focus,(8k), (4k), (Masterpiece), (Best Quality), fantasy, extremely detailed, intricate, hyper detailed, (perfect face), illustration,soft lighting,(specular lighting:1.4),blue eyes,short hair, sweat,dripping juices, squirting from her pussy,squirting from her veganahades-8500
Negative prompt: (bad-artist:1.0), (e-girl:1.2), (worst quality, low quality:1.4), (bad_prompt_version2:0.8), bad-hands-5
Steps: 25, Sampler: DPM++ 2M Karras, CFG scale: 8, Seed: 4125337559, Size: 512x768, Model hash: 35d51ba12c, Model: 1kotosAbyssproto_kotosabyssprotov1, Denoising strength: 0.6, Clip skip: 2, ENSD: 31337, Hires upscale: 2.5, Hires upscaler: Latent (bicubic)
this dude spent days perfecting his model that produced this uncanny smear
and I thought artgays had bad attention to anatomy and details, lol
If you dont like the model just use another my man
your abominable waifu has some kind of melanomas on her face, she needs to get those checked
>waifu
It was a short prompt to test the model,
same prompt diferen seed
What AI is generating this?
oh it had a typo, so that second image doesnt need the hades thing
what a beautiful stained glass window
Jesus look at all those fingers!
Freaky
sex
>sex
I prefer the original version, without ayy hands.
>AI, the agent of Shaytan, will cover the world in degeneracy
By Allah... Save us...
You're laughing? Artists are starving by the dozens as machines take over their livelihoods and you're laughing?
yes
Name 3
Jim, Joe and Pearl (formerly known as Kevin)
They were already kind of starving long before machine art came into the picture.
Yes
And when they come for my field, I will cry as others laugh over me
Is already too late to start graphic design?? Seems AI does everything better, but I don't want to mess with a Discord bot for it or pay subscription
Now this is top tier AI art. Artgays like Mleth and unsomnus BTFO
Why is ai art trying to be memed with indians? Is it projection? When I think of poorgay beggar I think of artists.
desperation
The only people who are more poor and less talented than artgays are pajeets
ok but that doesn't make sense, you just arbitrarily took some demographic you don't like or that has a negative aura about it and said "this is you". Nothing ai art likers do or say indicates they're financially poor, unless you're saying they are too poor to buy your art, in which case it is just projection due to you losing money as an artist.
>Nothing ai art likers do or say indicates they're financially poor
The fact they think their sub-par slop is better than human generated slop is shows they're not likely to be well educated, at the least, and education strongly correlates with wealth
>Well educated people create AI able to generate art, gaining great wealth in the process
>Jealous low-educated artists try to force AI to be seen as low-brow to save their social status
Face it, all artists are equivalent in value to a string of code. It's entirely up to you what value you place them both at, just remember that they're equal.
>and education strongly correlates with wealth
>t.putin presses nuke humanity button because his IQ said so.
russia has no nukes
>Low IQ miss the point
Color my shock.
Dumb esl poster
>Why is ai art trying to be memed with indians? Is it projection?
>When I think of poorgay beggar I think of artists.
t.projection
It's a stone, Ammaar, you didn't make it!
I love generating images of my husband
>normal hand/fingers
you didn't generate it
>No vmfb found
I don't know whats going on
>AI art can do this, but it can't do that
AI can modify a text based on instructions, as seen with chat gpt. If you combine that with image generative/image modifying AI, you get an artist that you can instruct verbally, show reference images to, redraw characters consistently, touch up your photoshops, change what you circle, etc.
When photography was invented, professional painting became a niche. When cameras became cheap, professional photography became a niche. Digital artists experienced an explosion in demand after the personal computer became powerful enough, but artists are not just producing aesthetically pleasing images. Only porn artists are paid to crank out that kind of thing. They occupy a similar niche as porn stars. The traditional porn industry became democratized into the self publishing only fans model. One would think that the most attractive porn star producing almost infinite images of themselves would wipe out competition, but it became about para social relationships with the porn stars, and their creativity and not so much about the images, per se.
I see AI art as mostly harming digital porn artists. Just like professional photographers, AI manipulating porn specialists will probably be popular for a while before streamlining makes individual use the norm. Outside of pornography, creativity will still be in demand. People don't seek out "the best" artists, they go for the one's who have the creativity and style that they want. You can tell an AI to mimic a style, but you still have to prompt them. It's the same reason why web design exists when there are so many content hosting options and platform. You still need to delegate to a specialist unless you have time to do it yourself. People give artists really difficult to understand instructions (totally contradicts) and even if you can make the AI understand that, until the machine can read your mind, literally, it's going to be easier for a specialist to interpret and develop an idea.
>it's going to be easier for a specialist to interpret and develop an idea.
It's not easy for artists to create art though and it's expensive. Prompting even if you don't get exactly what you want is a better way to spend time and money.
What's stopping you?
>OP image shows kaine
>nobody in this thread is actively making AI art featuring kaine and her "very puffy vulva"
Seriously Black folk?
elf ears look dumb on her
>Sakimichan
😐
>Sakimichan (AI)
:O
only spergs cry about AI and sakimichan
>AI Art
No such thing. AI cannot make art. This is a mathematical models output masquerading as a painting.
it creates art
It objectively does not
>Mathematical models
That is what AI is tho
>inb4 no true scotsman
>AI will never be able to math
>AI will never be able to write
>AI will never be able to paint
>AI will never be able to think or feel
>AI will never be able to run our government- ACK!
So glad AI makes drawlets seethe. At least AI has better shading, frick Calarts and modern anime.
I feel like the only people happy about this are either eternal NEETs bitter about everything, pajeets with aphantasia, or just people that foolishly think this won't affect them for the worse.
It's like if Hitler went into StableDiffusion rather than politics when he didn't get into /ic/ school
What's it like being mentally moronic?
>7 second reply
hello bot
>literally can't count
jesus
>he sees machines everywhere
You will be assimilated.
Do girls really do this? Sit against a wall and let birds poo on their butts? Is this a real fetish?
AIbros when they see generic big tiddy realistic shading fantasy elf #87429
literally me
AI art can't even top Pixiv rankings
https://www.bellazon.com/main/topic/98716-how-will-bellazon-tackle-ai-generated-images/
keep seething meatbag
you VILL enjoy artificial art
you VILL eat ze bugs
ITT: asshurt tumblr refugees
So where are the AI games ?
who in this thread is actually making a game with AI art ?
it's coming anon
soon AI will make 3D objects+textures
Indie games will EXPLODE
so none ?
I see that's what I thought
>Noooo AI isn't perfect yet, stop using it!!!
>How can you fap to an image where the background isn't properly aligned???
>Don't you see that the finger is bent the wrong way?!!
>fapping to still images
are 50yo or just outright moronic?
How long until someone drops a fat cash and makes AI art able to be copyright?
Do you want to explain what's so important about copyrights? Are you moronic?
Black person are you dumb?
I'll wait.
It's concerning that so many morons here are sucking off AI slop while constantly talking about soul vs soulless in other Ganker threads
Are these genuine shills?
They're bots themselves. Ganker is basically dead now by being flooded with non-human bots posting the same shit over and over.
>They're bots themselves. Ganker is basically dead now by being flooded with non-human bots posting the same shit over and over.
>closeup of the human
>the human is very small in the image
AI BTFO AI SUCKS AI CAN'T DO ANYTHING RIGHT AHAHAHA
AI generation is soulful compared to leftist crap, because people actually take time and effort into refining their prompts to be perfect. It's the opposite of soulless, because unlike 99% of artists who are paywalling shitheads or actual propagandist, prompt artists do it because they love making things, they love art, they're just using technology to not waste time and make things easier for themselves.
>AIgays are /misc/tards
checks out, neither AI superfans nor /misc/tards are very bright, not surprised to see they're one and the same
>seething artcel
>how dare he talk shit about our glorious socialism
This must be a bot. It's just buzzword soup.
>opposite of soulless
good goy
Not to mention that leftist art is flat and dull with no details added whatsoever, and often it's the same tripe. At least in Japanese art you get good art with people like Miura, Araki, Otomo, Natsumoto, Amano, etc. With Western art you can bet 9/10 it's going to be shit. The good artists like Frazetta, Crom, etc, are thrown to the side.
>mfw obsessed anti-AI crusaders storm onto my twitter
>like some AI art
>don't hate all artists
I fricking hate having this kind of disgusting centrist mindset. If could honestly be a fanatic for one or the other side, I'd be a lot happier.
>like most artists
>like AI art
>laugh at seething artist cucks
If anything, art will no longer become a job and bring passion back to it