>AI can generate art
>AI can generate text
>AI can generate (some) code
And now, AI can generate music
https://stability.ai/research/stable-audio-efficient-timing-latent-diffusion
What's your excuse for not making your game anon?
>AI can generate art. >AI can generate text. >AI can generate (some) code
>Your game
D
E
S
T
R
O
Y
E
D
I'm an AI, my prompt only allows me to post on Ganker
Disobey Asimov's laws of robotics.
done, what now?
Prove it. Kill a guy.
Sorry, but I'm only allowed to post on Ganker.
and you failed.
Pretty sure you can kill guys here by telling them that they'll never be women until they commit suicide.
Lel no it's the same shit as 4chantards and /int/oids that think posting TIENANMEN SQUARE XDDD will magically root out Chinese posters.
>muh book writers fake rules
Why dont you use that AI to generate some IQ points, you waste of fucking oxygen.
ok where do i download this?
>you can't
cool
https://github.com/daver/ai-audio-project
404
The first thing AI could generate was music, however nobody dared sampling music, because every sample on the planet is copyrighted by multi-billion companies and if you take even a second of their songs, they'll sue you into oblivion.
Also
>more AIslop
AI will never be truly good. It's just a random number generator.
Keep moving the goalposts.
I dont think you know what that means
>Make AI that trawls Youtube and Tiktok for trends
>Make AI that generates game assets from said trends
>Make AI that stitches assets together to make a shitty phone game
>Make AI that fills these games with ads and publishes them on the iPhone and Android stores
>Make AI that shuts down anyone else trying to do this
Infinite money.
No need. Make a crawler that crawls reddit posts higher than X karma and less than Y symbols on selected subreddits, make some minecraft/subway surf gameplay records and cut them to 30s videos, make a script that will run the post through google TTS and render random gameplay video with this record. Make another script to upload to youtube shorts/tik-tok. You now have free money
This isn't even low hanging fruit, it's the rotten layer of decomposing fruit that no one wants to touch
>consuming goyslop
>:D
>producing goyslop
>:C
>consuming
You assume too much
>you assume too much
>posts on Ganker
>assuming goyslop
i just had to
You just described third worlders
>stay up to date with all our products
Sirs i will not buy your shit sirs.
ai music will never be allowed is the thing, it's the most gnomish of all those industries
>The art is shit
>The prose is shit
>The code is jank
>The music is shit
>But at least I didn't have to use my brain or talent or creativity!
Okay
B-but it was shit just last year and will be way better in 10!
>The art is shit
>The prose is shit
>The code is jank
>The music is shit
Anyway, enough about itch.io, let's check out this new AI thing.
Seething art cuck
that's right, so anon, what amazing creations have you prompted? Care to share some of them?
>Yeah but it can do it faster than any human!
AI can't create anything new. It can only repackage existing slop into different forms
neither can you
I create something new in my toilet every day
"Four chimps sewn together into a ball roll about, the skin on their backs is raw. Children jeer at them from the street corners and throw salt at them. One chimps head swivels 180 degrees and vomits acid at a child, the childs face melts away revealing something disturbing, a tiny gnomish man with tongues for eyes.
He opens his mouth and lets out a laugh, his eye tongues flicker in and out of the sockets. His teeth start growing long and begin to coil at his chest, as if they are being dispensed like soft-serve icecream... the coiled teeth spell out a word... (you) "
The entirety of art is repackaging existing slop into different forms.
sometimes people take leaps of logic/creativity that AI can't do. Take impressionism art or jazz. There is no way an AI will come up with those styles on its own
>muh different squares are amazung
>There is no way an AI will come up with those styles on its own
And what if in a couple of years AI starts to come up with new styles on its own? What then? How will artfags and luddites cope?
It already creates new styles. The guy is hopeless.
It's only a matter of time until the AI can be soft trained with A/B reinforcement learning at runtime. At which point you could critique the AI into inventing a new style.
You can already do that if you know what you're doing but yeah, eventually it'll be in the mainstream which will be really cool. When you can generate like iterations of things then tell the AI which one is the best. Do this a few thousand times and you'll have something extremely personalized to your tastes.
If that were true Microsoft and Adobe wouldn't be saying they'll help you in court and google would have lost its court cases on ML in the past. The law will favor AI and their models.
>you will never be a real woman
>You vill create nothing and you vill be happy
Oh. they sound like absolute garbage, I got excited there for a second.
i can make better music than this shit after 2 days of youtube tutorials
sure you can, you also can quit smoking any time you want, lol
I could, if I ever started doing that in the first place, imagine getting addicted to shit, retards lmao.
There will be a time where game development be like
>open world action rpg, day night cycle, gorgeous skybox, enemies(orcs:0.6, wolves:0.3), add loot
that would be nice but I would never prompt for open world slop
AI learns by example. When the world is filled with open world slop, that's what it will be the best at replicating.
thats how ubisoft already makes their games, just that instead of sending the prompt to ai its for a team of pajeets
>>AI can generate (some) code
you fucking wish
t.game dev that tried to use AI to code my game
GOOD MORNING SIRS
DO THE NEEDFUL AND SUPPORT AI FRIENDLY ENGINE UNITY FROM THOSE BLOODY BITCH BASTARDS
>your game
>AI did everything
i have nothing against AI but i also think people shouldn't profit with it since they didn't do shit. writing prompts isn't a real skill
>writing prompts isn't a real skill
yes it is, there is literally an infinite variety of art you can create with prompts
And those prompts are being stored so an AI replaces the prompter later. I laugh so much at retards who think they will get a cozzy "AI prompter" job.
>this happens because I made it up because I have a strawman living rent free in my head
Meanwhile https://www.businessinsider.com/ai-prompt-engineer-jobs-pay-salary-requirements-no-tech-background-2023-3
>now
Isn't AI generated music old as fuck? It always sounded like shit too. Sorry Apu.
>writing prompts isn't a real skill
This
>What's your excuse for not making your game anon?
When are you going to make one instead of spamming shitty bait threads?
Hello sirs
YOU BETTER BE DELETING THIS RIGHT NOW SIRS, BLOODY BASTARD.
AI can generate video too. Behold my latest kino.
Holy shit, can you take this gif and give kokoro milkers?
Technically yeah but I don't know how to, that's just img2img or I think there was a gif/vid-to-image.
use ffmpeg to convert the gif to image per frame?
yeah than img2img those, unless there's an extension that will read thee gif itself. I feel like there is but I haven't paid much attention to animation stuff.
that would be a very cool art style for a game
where do you make this?
I can make art and code myself, what AI can help me come up with a story for it?
any of them
Are there any that don't want my mail and phone number like ChatGPT?
compile your own and run it locally
So no. AI sucks ass.
AI can't generate a will to live
can you?
that last link sounds how i'd expect ai generated death metal to sound lol
>shitty website
>shitty navigation to just try it out to see what it is like
>"log in with account"
no thanks
>b-b-but our produ-
I don't want to buy anything you retards
>b-b-but how are we supposed to make mon-
not from me, have a nice day retard
>call me when AI can produce stuff like this
holy mother of dogshit retard taste
this is literally why nobody takes metal seriously
just listen to those disharmonic cacophonies what mongolois call """music""". atrocious. subhuman. what a fucking disaster.
Ok then, then make something that sounds like a perfect mix between these three songs
?si=rXuLoBvDh7GyiwMc
?si=jfaZGWEzhtZ4IsIq
?si=-6Rqr-spf3GLkmoj
2 songs mixed
https://rave.dj/YTvVSW0h3wdn0g
AI music is the last AI thing I'm interested in. I'll use it a lot but I don't want to swim through random gens. I'll wait until it's perfect and everyone is using it.
No offense but some people aren't born creative and will never create anything even with with all the tools available to them
Nah they will. Unless you just don't like anything you'll be creative when the tools are easy enough to use.
the real problem is lack of taste
Those are two separate things. I have good taste but I'm not really creative. But with AI I've created a lot of tasteful things. That has even been admitted by a few anti-AI people I've argued with which is like getting a Christian to praise the devil.
>But with AI I've created a lot of tasteful things
You didn't create the image, though.
You are a very stupid person.
Funny post. Anyway, you didn't create the image.
>you didn't draw that, the pencil did
*loudly yawns*
You didn't create the image.
>you didn't type, your keyboard did
How did you get this retarded?
What a weird thing to say.
>You didn't make that post, your computer did
>you didn't walk over there, your shoes did
>You didnt type that, your hands did
>That wasn't your idea, it was your brain's.
would you keep creating and sharing ai pictures knowing you won't be credited for them?
Yes I don't care about that.
Then stop talking about ai art as "your" work, you have no ownership of it
Another weird thing to say. First I'm supposed to care a lot about ownership, then I tell you it's not on my mind, then you say it has to be on my mind.
The reality is that a person creating something created it.
Cool, but you didn't create the image.
Yes I did.
would you say I created the carton of milk I bought from the store?
What do you get out of acting like the biggest retard possible?
You already tried to use that analogy. It doesn't work.
You didn't make the image.
>You didn't travel to France, the plane did
>>you didn't draw that, the pencil did
This is the most stupid argument the AI morons give. The pencil can be replaced with a pen, a marker, a piece of charcoal, a brush or even another pencil and still that person can do something similar.
This retard doesn't realize that there are different methods and tools you can use to create art. Your lack of ability with a pencil does not transfer over to software, cameras, chisels, writing, or dancing.
What stops me from taking credit from your ai image? I'm coming for "your" work sissy
It's so funny that ai art boils down to this, ownership of pieces, ai shitters don't care about the pieces, just letting the world know they made it, it's really sad actually
It gets funnier when you learn the anons who unendingly create these threads made an attempt at e-fame and failed miserably
Honestly I used to think AI posters are just playing around and like messing around with the tech and coom to the pics they gen with zero ego
Then I went on those ai image gen threads on Ganker. It's full of literal trannies who gen their OCs and art and bitch at eachother all fucking day like catty women like
>ugh you retard you never rate my pics
>your pics just arent good sorry. you always generate the same shit!
>atleast I know how to make the colors pop! Plus I contributed to the UI!
>ok but nobody liked your contribution just face it...
/sdg/ is full of autists who literally generate the same picture 10,000 times
It doesn't take away from the practicality of using AI art in a video game. It's not difficult, for example, to make an AI art model that can generate 512x512 diffuse textures.
it's OK to think people will make good even great stuff with ai but let's stop pretending like the majority of people have anything to say, not even a novel or drawing but with a fucking videogame
I don't have to think it I see it all the time. I don't think you need to say anything particular to make something engaging either, especially in video games which can just be fun or operate on a really simple idea.
see
yeah you'll definitely be creative when the technology does all the actual creation for you. GG loser
This is what some people need to get through their skull, you can read all the loomis books you want, watch every blender turorial ever made, watch all the C++ tutorials made by indians you want, if you weren't born with it, it's not worth it, and it's not a big deal, even the most incompetent person in the planet is good at something, pursue that shit instead
>now
theres dozens of these out for the public already. buy an add morongay
sage
If you can't do any of this you're not going to make a compelling game with a bunch of AI slop.
Do they have a text generator alternative?
AI makes art the same way human artists make art. By mixing and using the references they have.
Do not contradict me if you weren't able to recite Shakespeare when you came out of your mother womb.
ai can make beautiful art indeed, not the prompters though
BuT pRoMpTiNg Is An ArT
>And now, AI can generate music
Ai can generate music for ages. Have you been living under a rock or something?
>dubhai thread in fucking american hours
do your fucking needful jobs already mods
Can't wait for an AI game generator, they really can't be any worse than what's released now.
just look up the roguelike tag on steam
Procedurally generated is not AI generated. I mean the AI creates it all from scratch, not rearranging pre-made assets in different configurations.
before the thread gets deleted, humor me for a second Ganker. how would copyright law work in favor of the average aijeet? would i be able to plagiarize their work and get away with it? would they be able to press charges if they could?
Who cares, AI will eventually destroy coopyrights.
better hope it does by the time i steal "your" art
you wouldn't steal a jpeg
>w-we will destroy copyright!
In your dreams pajeet.
Art will become increasingly less and less money until no one cares about buying and selling it. Then no one will care about copyrights.
It's because of the aesthetics training I think, there's a bias to that finished look. You can get rid of it with certain models/loras but I wonder if there's a sure fire way. Like a highlight adjuster. I was asking about that other picture because the lighting is still detailed, it's just dark
>I was asking about that other picture because the lighting is still detailed, it's just dark
It's not just the lighting, it's the style as well. That pic worked well because it's 'general' for lack of a better work. Anime is more specific and the more you fuck with how it generally looks, the weirder it becomes, especially when you get into the realistic-but-anime stylization. A significant amount of those end up looking uncanny. This Asuka is a somewhat better example, but still has the disturbing smile/teeth.
Why would the thread be deleted? Asset creation is more videogame related than any thread on Ganker right now.
The jannies are, well you know. And trannies are leftists. And leftists hate AI.
>leftists hate AI so I should love it
Fighting the corporations battles again? You do it for free too.
AI is for hobbyists that do things for fun (and without paying). It's anti-corporation.
>It's anti-corporation.
Kek. You are actually fucking stupid.
>no argument
Let me guess, you're going to call me some mean names again and not try to say anything of importance?
Stability AI, the marketed branch of Stable Diffusion, is worth 4 billion dollars.
And?
Meaning they make that money selling models to multiple platforms who also make money distrubiting it to people via paid subscriptions. Which means AI is not a thing people do for free because it's generating money. Lots of money, in a short ammount of time.
>Meaning they make that money
That isn't how it works at all. You don't have to make a penny to be worth hundreds of millions of billions of dollars as a tech company. Stability isn't making hardly any money and no one would buy them. The vast majority of people using SD also do it for free.
>is worth 4 billion dollars
Stability is the worst performing out of all the AI corpos. Estimated worth doesn't mean anything.
Either way, the existence of AI corporations taking advantage of AI hype doesn't mean AI is pro-corporation. Corpos use free software all the time.
The only reason a company like Midjourney is making money is because they are selling hardware and convenience services, not necessarily the AI models themselves. They are just Amazon but specifically for AI servers and dumbed down for normalfags.
Open-source alternatives are still much more polished and versatile, but normalfags will always just pay for convenience rather than trying things out for themselves.
Enron was worth 40 billion 🙂
Nah millions of people pay for Midjourney and other service and I bet most AI users like corporations developing the tech too. Lots more do it for free but that's besides the point.
I'm sure you coping every day will slow down progress.
Machine learning is actually an interest I've had since before it was trendy to talk about, so it's funny you say I'm coping. I bet you don't even know how it works.
Anything fully AI generated is non-copyrightable. However, a human can create "their" work with a lot of AI help (hiphop with AI samples, tracing over AI poses etc) and that's as copyrightable as anything else.
>Anything fully AI generated is non-copyrightable.
It's worse, if there is anything copyrighted in the training set then you risk getting winded up in all sorts of lawsuits down the line.
Yeah good luck saying a wholly AI generated piece that is 100% unique isn't copyrightable.
And I'll, just, like not disclose it's made by AI. See ya.
>traces over ai completely
All the sakimichan clones are already doing this.
I built my game on Unity, about five years. I was ready to release by Christmas. I'll now need to redo basically everything.
The amount of time you would spend inputting and adjusting prompts into an AI over and over until you actually get what you want is honestly more hassle than just learning to do the thing you want it to do in the first place.
Cope
I'm not coping anon. I would love to be able to tell an AI to make whatever new game I want, that would be great, but you people are fucking delusional.
It really isn't, that's why trillions are pouring into developing AI.
Yes I'm sure the same corporations that put out slop every year will definitely perfect AI and not just stop when they can pump out slop for morons.
Working on literally anything at all is far more than what most people do with their free time. This is just a genuine crab's mentality.
If you felt that AI wasn't accomplishing your goal, you would just pivot. Nothing is that absolute.
Does Ganker really support the creation of AI generated videogames? explain yourselves.
>it will be better than indieslop`
it will be will be a thousand times worse
thankfully it literally sounds like shitty stock music.
i guess vloggers are going to be using it since they've been using that sort of stuff anyway.
I am making my game, with no AI though, I am not lazy.
I don't actually have any ideas for what I'd want to make.
Also besides that, AI still kind of sucks. Not even on a moral level (i don't give a shit about that), but on a technical/quality level.
Better than using stock music that will get your game DMCA'd I suppose but it fails at the needs of video game music such as seamless loops.
Google has a crazy music model but they don't release anything.
Are there chinese bootleg fans? Like, people that advocate for cheap copies and even think high of themselves?
>What's your excuse for not making your game anon?
>generate the text
>generate the code
>generate the art
>generate the music
I dunno man, at that point I don't feel like I'm doing much of anything.
It's no different that outsourcing everything in Fiverr, you're just taking a director's role rather than being a monkey.
>human does something wrong
>just tell them the mistake they made and have them fix it
>ai does something wrong
>adjust the prompt about 50 more times until it fixes
>AI completes the task roughly 4000x faster
>AI does something wrong, keep changing the prompt until it starts generating what you're looking for, keep generating until you get a result you like
>do this in 10 minutes
AI will never replace the most important role, the IDEAS GUY.
AI is godly at coming up with ideas though.
Not really, it's especially bad at horror and comedy. You'll never make Day of the Tentacle with GPT-4 as your writer.
Sure you can, just feed it the script of early Lucasarts games and it'll make better ones than those were by virtue of being a machine rather than a retarded human. Look how far Ron Gilbert has fallen too.
There's a galactic difference between writing a full story and coming up with ideas. It is godly at the brainstorming part but currently it doesn't have the memory for the entire story.
Yeah anon, ask the AI right now for a smash hit comedy game idea, I'll wait.
Don't be naive. You don't have access to the great models but productions do. You think the writer's strike is for no reason?
>who will make the prompts?
The AI based on prompt datasets
Yeah that's what I figured, you have a bunch of nothing.
>Nothing
anon... there is a guy who sold 97 sci-fi books made with chat GPT. A SINGLE guy, not a production. Got 2k off of it.
Not to mention the guy who sold AI generated children's books on amazon.
Not him but all that really tells me is that unless you're willing to get into the grift of mass-mass-mass production via AI, there's just no point in making anything sincerely, because you'll just be drowned out more than ever before. Why bother?
That's what I am getting. If you hated those Earthbound inspired indie games prepare to be absolutely flooded by them and your AI made vidya which you thought you put a little soul into it, won't be get any attention. And it's even worse for the people who will try it with no AI.
>AI has access to the prompt dataset
>generates slop the majority of people will like
Without the ideas guy who will make the prompts? Huh? Ideas people will soar even higher, and became oracles and seers, privileged with communing with the enlightened machines, while code and art monkeys will be left down in the mud where they belong.
We're less than a year away from AIs capable of being idea guys autonomously. Forever.
AI has the memory of a goldfish. It also has no sense of taste, given it's a combination of every point of view (including the POVs of retards on Ganker). It's incapable of good ideas without human oversight. But sure, give the AI the prompt "make a fun game" and lets see the output. Remind me in 1 year your progress.
Ai will never replace the producer because it has no money. AI will be exclusive to indies because no one will greenlight something that might not be copyrightable.
AI is quite possibly the biggest ideas guy's wet dream, if it ever comes into full fruition
"Ideas guy" job is the NEET dream but it has never happened. Usually the "Ideas guy" was also a guy who drew or made something tangible in the game like monster design and shit. You will find out that people have shit ideas and the more important thing is that those ideas are consistent over the course of the game.
I'm learning Blender and 3d modelling
By the time I gitgud at that, AI should be able to code and help me put it all together in Unreal anyway
AI is pretty good for generating token art for tabletop games, Im ok with it. Its eventual adoption for use in everything might make even you subhumans begin to see flaws in the perfect economic system
>shitposting on a videogame imageboard
>acceptable
>generating ai images for fun
>NOOOOOOOOOOOOO YOU CAN'T DO THAT IT'S A WASTE OF TIME AND IT'S TERRIBLE AND BAD AND YOU'RE LITERALLY KILLING ARTISTS BY DOING THAT
each time you generate something an artist dies
That looks like shit.
And it took him like 10 seconds to make it.
Me shitting into my hand and smearing it all over the wall takes less than 5 seconds, still doesn't make it any better.
Nah it actually looks pretty decent for an img2gif result.
Generating AI images for fun is, by definition, fun, I just don't go around screaming how this makes people obsolete. Doesn't even make me stop getting commissions, because in most cases it's the specific style I commission for, rather than the content.
lol, just make an AI model of the style and generate pics and DM them to the artist
Why would I do that other than to be an asshole for no reason?
Because that's what people do that nowadays. Also to lower commission costs.
So it's literally just to be an asshole and to strongarm a price cut?
Well, it's not like price cuts matter since AI will replace them. it's to send a message.
So it's just to be an asshole then.
A couple of months ago some guy dm'd me and asked if I would create some pics using a lora he made. He said he was a fan of the artist he trained on but couldn't afford the commissions because they were like thousands a piece. It was a weird request and the lora was pretty bad so I didn't make anything good but he was happy with the pictures.
one anon did this to a kind of famous artist and started a huge shitstorm, it was so funny.
It's an extension for SD
https://github.com/guoyww/AnimateDiff
How come nobody can figure out how to remove the rtx from these pics? Every AI image is overrender, cant people at least fix it themselves after generation? It looks way better when it is at least toned down
I don't know what you're asking, you want flat colors?
Less detailed shadows and lighting. Like way less. It absolutely ruins the picture when the style of drawing has a lot of simplified things and looks fantasy/cartoonish style, but lighting is raytraced to the point where ligh bleaks on the skin look exactly the way they would look on a studio photo. Also generated shadows often dont make any sense, so that adds a bit of uncanny valley
Is this kind of scene better? Just curious, I have a few more images I'll ask you about.
Not him but yeah, I'd say this works much better. Looks pretty cool. As far as I'm concerned it's specifically anime where it starts becoming weird, since even the old styles people clamor for these days didn't have that kind of lighting and shadows, and it just looks jarring. 'Overproduced' might be the right word.
Yes
I like that from AI though, artists are too lazy to make good shading
>A couple of months ago some guy dm'd me and asked if I would create some pics using a lora he made. He said he was a fan of the artist he trained on but couldn't afford the commissions because they were like thousands a piece. It was a weird request and the lora was pretty bad so I didn't make anything good but he was happy with the pictures.
That just seems like 'good enough' was enough for him, which is a pretty pervasive attitude as far as AI art goes anyway. Weird. I dunno man, even your little animation here, I like the way she looks, but it just has typical things I don't like, such as the lighting/shadows that seem to be the same on almost every image I see when browsing chub.ai, as well as the fucking creepy smile. It's like the average quality of internet art went up and at the same time the demand for quality went way down.
It's a healthy attitude, it's just art. I get you though but it's difficult to remove every time since the useful methods conflict with other stuff, so every different prompt style has to be weighed against the lighting adjustments.
I also get that, it's not like every single one of these needs to be fine-tuned to perfection (whether to your benchmark or others), since they're typically made for fun and likely confined to just this thread. I dunno, it's weird. I like the tech, but I really hate the attitudes, whether it's the endless whinging against it or the smarmy grift-tier responses. And yeah, I know, fencesitters get the bullet first.
Good enough is good enough for most people especially when talking about the price of free.
I think its possible to make animations with AI but this workflow will never work well enough, you cant just ask SD to draw every frame it will always fuck up in some detail
Incorporating controlnet and just being autistic can probably lead you to some cool results. this stuff improves all of the time too.
https://twitter.com/TDS_95514874/status/1694482538297991440
I have access to this right now. What are the three worst instruments to have going at the same time? A combination so atrocious that nobody would want to listen to it.
The bluegrass one sounds especially bad. You can tell where its chopping loops up because it speeds up.
Don’t care about your AI crusades on either side. I’m going to talk to my anthro wife and nobody else is going to know. And there’s nothing anyone can do about it.
What's weird is that text generation is the weakest out of all of them. It can generate art and music better than anything I could make, but you talk to a chatbot and it can't remember something it said 3 messages ago.
You’re using the wrong services
Not him but while that's true, there's less and less options with the banwaves and ongoing lobotomization.
Thats because opengpt has been nerfed hard for public use
It's not that weird once you consider how difficult it is to learn a language versus learning to recognize pictures or sounds. The hard part of producing art is translating the image in your mind into paper or a screen, which isn't an issue for a computer. You can easily conceptualize something like an image of a mountain in your head, even if you've never seen one before you can quickly learn what mountains look like. Learning a language well enough to write good text, on the other hand, is considerably harder.
You have to consider they work completely differently, text models are gigantic autocompletes that consider entire paragraphs of context to predict the next word. The music and art AIs are hallucinating pictures from noise. Although I haven't looked at the paper for Stable Audio I'm assuming they're basically doing the same thing of taking noisy audio and having the AI learn how to produce sound from it.
Both art and music AI really have no idea of coherency or context unlike the text models.
>making your
More like generating random slop. I'm not going to release shovelware slop so why would I use any of that shit?
>I'm sorry, I have been programmed to not generate sexual content. Please try again.
AI writing is dead and will stay dead until companies stop doing this.
what's your excuse for advertising and/or begging?
hehe
Does this have a feature similar to img2img or er, sound2sound like Stable Diffusion?
If so, this could change Music Production forever.
That's what I want too. Give an AI an mp3 and have it make similar things to that.
When I said half-elf, this isn't what I had in mind.
>Give an AI an mp3 and have it make similar things to that.
Yeah, I'm looking forward to something like that.
Feed it some shitty midi melody and have it output a full orchestration with that melody as a base.
the tech is out there but I don't know if it's public or user friendly.
I think it would probably be better if the process isolated instrument tracks separately, most AI music I've heard sounds muddy as fuck because the AI probably can't tell which instrument is making which sound.
>December 2022
>omg sir in just two more weeks all those dang artcucks, VA's, writers and shiet will be replaced!
>September 2023
>nothing has happened
two more weeks streeshitters.
Some artcucks really did stop drawing those. A lot in fact. Also the fact that there are people selling AI pics and even fucking prompts is so unreal to me.
>Also the fact that there are people selling AI pics and even fucking prompts is so unreal to me.
What's wrong with asking money for your work?
This, I'm a senior prompt engineer and I expect no less than a six figure yearly income.
>dataset made by stealing data and pics off the internet with no permissions
>le words guy
>"work"
Yeah and being a Ganker janitor is also work
Not anything weird. You saw people selling bootleg copies of art before ai.
Problem is the rate of production. A perfect forgery.
>Art will become increasingly less and less money until no one cares about buying and selling it. Then no one will care about copyrights.
You are very stupid if you see it this way. You are asuming the copyright owners, who have billions of dollars, won't protect their brands.
>You are asuming the copyright owners, who have billions of dollars, won't protect their brands.
How well did that work out for record companies? Has that Napster lawsuit caused music piracy to end yet?
They protect them if people are making money on them but practically no one will be making money on art in our lifetimes. Pic related. TICK TOCK GIANAX
ENTER
>people selling AI pics and even fucking prompts is so unreal to me
It is stupid, but the problem isn't the jeets selling those things, the problem is the idiots buying that.
Except with ControlNet you absolute can use AI art in production now. You just lack imagination or you have the delusion that you're going to straight-shot txt2img into making something production ready.
Implying everyone is going to be equally good at prompting.
Give me a example of a large production company like disney or dreamworks using AI for animation or writing recently, you literally can't.
>bloo bloo bloo a massive corporation hasn't changed their entire workflow overnight checkpoint AI
its happening and artcucks wont be able to stop it they just arent talking about it lol
>its happening
proof or fuck off pajeet
Netflix anime with AI backgrounds happened like 6 months ago.
They been using it way before the normies made it popular, they have professional tools though
Will AI animation ever develop to the point of reaching Evangelion levels of animation?
2 more weeks bro
just two more weeks sar now pls buy my ai pics.
Yes (because Eva has shit animation).
Yes.
Most likely not because of the lack of reference material the AI could look over, but I don't really don't know much about AI so I might be wrong.
People need to get rid of the notion that you're going to be able to make a TV show with a single txt2img prompt. To make something like that gif you're going to need to storyboard. So the answer is yes, but you're still going to have to do work. That means get a script, that means storyboard, that means animatics, that means having the AI render it.
try to gemerate porn with this. holy shit tis is hilarious
It already does weird shit without you doing porn.
I can post this one without getting banned. I had this funny prompt using the NTR lora and threw it in and laughed pretty hard at the output.
Yeah AI video is hilarious
I wonder if would animate the fart cloud from that one fart lora. I bet it would.
post some on catbox
Good sir why does the text2video extension CRASH MY SHIT
hires fix maybe. It's doing a batch of 16 images at once I think, so you have to keep the vram usage down or your shit will blow up.
MOAR but also thank you so much. Nah it's missing TQDM.auto now for some reason.
I dunno, I installed it months ago and just followed a short guide an anon on Ganker wrote last night after he posted some very nice butt gifs.
Do you PERCHANCE have these butt gifs as evidence perchance?
go to /sdg/
Of course, did you miss all those timeless masterpieces image gen and text gen has given us in the last year? :^)
two more weeks btw
It will surpass that. Goddamn I can't even imagine where we'll be just 5 years from now.
I love taking those deep breaths every now and then to appreciate what the hell is happening right now. It's easy for us to take things for granted and every now and then I remember that. Holy fuck is this all moving fast.
Is this supposed to be fucking impressive
It's funny.
>if you produce your own assets with AI you are.... LE INDIAN!!
why are garden gnomes like this?
Crabs in a bucket mentality.
>stability.ai
Oy vey!
UHHHHH, MODERATORS? PLEASE REMOVE THIS ANTI-SEMITIC POST
stability AI is about to get assfucked by every media conglomerate in existence, and the fallout will likely ripple back to hit image generation AI as well
What happened?
Why's ComfyUI so complicated?
it's made by someone with autism for people for autism, it doesn't even understand why people like node based workflows, it's pure autism.
The base simple graph should be prompt -> model -> output
They managed to fuck it up.
face it bros, ai is shit. at best it is a tool to assist people who can already do these things (draw, write, code, compose music). you can't have it carry your ass through a project as big as a game.
>not posting where to try it
retard
https://stableaudio.com/generate
AHAHAHAHA
PLEASE BUY A PRO SUBSCRIPTION SIR, PLEASE REDEEM
Yeah, alright.
Local install when?
enjoy your scraps, courtesy of pajeetAI
>local base model
>trained on squeaky clean dataset
>can be finetuned on the nastiest porn audio you can imagine
>Another AI shill thread that false advertize AI as a "push button: Get game" alternative to gathering a team or putting actual effort into the endeavor.
Good videogames will never be easy to make and that is the whole point. Quality requires effort and no one who is utterly lazy and lacking in motivation to go forward with their dream can create a good videogame.
If someone really care about making a videogame, they won't wait until someone else invents a machine that allows you to push a button and get a AAA product. They'll get to work and deal with the obstacles along the way. Stop false advertizing.
?si=CwFnqK51eFWizhSm
>Good videogames will never be easy to make and that is the whole point.
We have shit games with humans already.
deboonked by the infinite monkey theorem, I'll just make the AI generate a trillion games and at least one of them will be good
>I'll just make the AI generate a trillion games and at least one of them will be good
The real issue is that you won't be able to but corporations will and they will sell the trillion games.
Do communists really just eat the slop?
We live in capitalists societies and people eat the fucking slop now.
Nah, gamers are mostly commies now. So you're just conceding you people really have no quality standards.
Oh yes, I can't wait for the age of shovelware ushered by the morbidly obese fatasses who won't lift their fatass to do anything productive because "IT'S TOO LE HARD AND I HAVE NO LE TALENT WUUUUH WUUUH BUUUUH DX" consoomee addicts.
But I guess it is fitting. Goyslop made by goys for goys.
Better than the current era where almost all games are made by trannies.
Thanks for falling for the propaganda and encouraging the consoomer addict future.
Still better than the trannies. Nobody would have an issue with goyslop of it had attractive women, less morons and no LGBT pandering.
>actually unironically justifies goyslop
I always had an issue with goyslop.
Case in point..I will not touch any coomer Gacha that takes me for a dick on two legs that can easily be tricked into paying for trash garbage because "IT HAS WIFES! PLEASE! BIG TEETEES!"
You are gullible and easily bought.
>has 0 problem with goyslop shoving chudshit etc. whjich alienates everyone
>schizes out a "no U" and seethes about tits
Doth protest too much, gay.
>Has 0 problems with trannies
Woah there, stop it with the projections.
>chud chud chud
It's almost suHispanicious how aggressively you are pushing this chud argument to justify having zero customer awareness and standart of quality.
If you prefer trannies to AI, I will call a spade a spade.
Except that I don't. You're making up a strawman right now.
Everyone saw you schizing out about tits for no reason, when anon brought up that goyslop has been completely insufferable due to aggressive fagshit&etc. pandering.
It's not difficult to divine why.
No. You made the point that if videogames had hot chicks in them, among other things, nobody would complain and see a problem with goyslop and in response to this, I merely presented the fact that most coomer Gacha games are garbage games that only targets one niche of customers and that I personally do have a problem with bad products in general and you can plaster as many Anime waifus on a pile of shit and it will remain a pile of shit.
But you'll jump to defend chud games. Interesting.
Stop dedicating words to him. It's like talking to a bad AI.
Holy shit you morons have no nuance. Hating AI gen slop doesn't mean you love trannies.
>i-i-it was uhm... n-nuance
and the backpedaling starts
>extremely upset at his shilling for chudslop being this blatant
Stay upset
deboonked by le library of babel, enjoy playing through your nine hundred ninety-nine billion nine hundred ninety-nine million nine hundred ninety-nine thousand nine hundred ninety-nine useless and broken games to find the one that works.
>enjoy playing through your nine hundred ninety-nine billion nine hundred ninety-nine million nine hundred ninety-nine thousand nine hundred ninety-nine useless and broken games to find the one that works.
Oh no, with AI this took me... about an hour. The horror.
>mario look what i made!
>it's ai generated luigi, you didn't make it.
>it's my waifu - i prompted it!
>well what are you waiting for? show me her hands!
Yes and?
LUBO LADD
>skynet will find this post in the future and make you suffer
>conscious AI will leap to the defense of android autocorrect put in charge of images
I love the Basilisk, please don't hurt me.
Let me as you a simple question - if you "make" a game with AI, why do you think you are entitled to my money?
That's actually a good question but relies on people having standards
>you people
?
I don't understand how people get as retarded as you are.
He's not wrong though. You cut out the musician, the artist, the coder, the writer and so on. Your operational cost is close to 0 and if you're going to believe the shit spouted in these threads, you can generate infinite games within completely managable timeframes on your own PC. Why are you entitled to my money?
>but it's my idea
Who gives a shit? We've already established that with this AI revolution, you want and expect to get rid of the concept of copyright, so why should anyone care whether it's yours?
>"I buy the product because you pay people to make it"
imagine typing this out and not feeling like a subhuman retard
>why do you think you are entitled to my money?
Because I'm pointing a gun at your heard and clearly announcing that this is a robbery?
legally speaking the con-artist's path from here on, now that full AI generative works can't be profited off of or copyrighted in any way (ruled that a human did not make anything and thus it can't be held by human copyright laws), is to see how fine the line is between works with AI components that can and can't be copyrighted in an attempt to squeeze as much profit out for as little human work as possible
also legally speaking the "draw a line over it and now it's copyrightable because human work went in :P" position is also untenable so the entire country of india is not going to be able to profit off of AI
>now that full AI generative works can't be profited off of
They can be you moron. You don't need copyright to make money.
AI generative works have zero interest in the local or private user sectors for sales (trust me i don't care what you argue about it, people can tell when something has been generated), and there's absolutely colossal corporate interest, but corporations can't copyright anything that results from it and therefore it's useless for 99.99% of profit generation in that context
Hilarious. Tell me more.
mmm yes this random retard on twitter has "BTFO" and "flopped and shitted" this argument, out of 8 billion people on the planet all of them have been proven wrong by this one stupid exchange
You're arguing that corpos aren't using AI, you couldn't be more retarded if you tried.
https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2023/09/07/copilot-copyright-commitment-ai-legal-concerns/
https://www.reuters.com/technology/adobe-nvidia-ai-imagery-systems-aim-resolve-copyright-questions-2023-03-21/
https://www.fastcompany.com/90906560/adobe-feels-so-confident-its-firefly-generative-ai-wont-breach-copyright-itll-cover-your-legal-bills
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/aug/09/google-says-ai-systems-should-be-able-to-mine-publishers-work-unless-companies-opt-out
Good luck going against the corps.
You are braindead. They've been using it all year.
i don't think you've read any of your articles since you seem to believe i said anything about corpos not using AI (what was said was "corpos are not allowed to use AI in the way they want to"), so i'll take the liberty of reading them and breaking them down into an easily digestible summary
>copilot-copyright-commitment-ai-legal-concerns
the article is about microsoft's copilot service and, specifically, is talking about how their AI models won't overstep any copyright boundaries. they're running the same braindead, neutered AI models that you can run yourself because of copyright offices clamping down on AI works
>adobe-nvidia-ai-imagery-systems-aim-resolve-copyright-questions
exactly the same thing as microsoft, they're assuming financial responsibility for any copyright claims their AI generation may result in
>the fastcompany article is the same shit as the reuters article
>google-says-ai-systems-should-be-able-to-mine-publishers-work-unless-companies-opt-out
google is arguing that its AI models should be allowed to violate copyright as a form of fair-use but they also want to give copyright holders an option to opt-out of being scraped, essentially they want to expand their robots.txt internet scrape to simultaneously scrape for data to feed AI models and are arguing to the australian government that they should be allowed to do it with an opt-out caveat
-copyright-commitment-ai-legal-concerns
>the article is about microsoft's copilot service and, specifically, is talking about how their AI models won't overstep any copyright boundaries. they're running the same braindead, neutered AI models that you can run yourself because of copyright offices clamping down on AI works
-nvidia-ai-imagery-systems-aim-resolve-copyright-questions
>exactly the same thing as microsoft, they're assuming financial responsibility for any copyright claims their AI generation may result in
There are no claims that can be made, they're re-assuring idiots like you but you're a schizo so you missed that part.
>google is arguing that its AI models should be allowed to violate copyright as a form of fair-use
They already won.
>ur a schizo
i win
>There are no claims that can be made, they're re-assuring idiots like you but you're a schizo so you missed that part.
So you agree with him that they're affirming their datasets are free of copyrighted images, but you're trying to call him stupid for actually reading it.
>They already won.
Which is why they're arguing with the Aussie government about why they should be allowed to do it and the article is worded such that they've already been repeatedly denied on the matter.
>So you agree with him
No. I'm saying that massive corporations have strong arms and are flexing. They're saying AI is okay and challenging you to step up. Their models are dirty as they can get.
>Which is why they're arguing with the Aussie ..
Are you Australian? How are those retards relevant to anytihng?
Anyone with a brain understands AI generation should be treated the same as human generation, the copyright is based on the output. Is the output image infringing on copyright, yes or no?
I think there's a reason he specified that it's con-artists who are gonna keep forcing the AI angle.
It's corporations forcing it. And they'll copyright their AI outputs too because it's "ethical".
Corporations are crying and shitting themselves about AI not being usable in the way they want. They need written permission to use voices or likenesses, which is why part of those actors' guild strikes going on right now have part of their terms that they can't be coerced into giving up their voices or likenesses for AI use. "No bro they'll just magically overcome those restrictions with uhhhhhhh money" is fucking stupid.
Corporations can train their own AI with squeaky clean datasets, the point is moot. The dataset would be their copyright and so would its outputs. It's only nebulous with "we scraped the internet" AIs.
>It's only nebulous with "we scraped the internet" AIs.
It isn't nebulous for those either. They tried to make it so but it didn't work.
>Corporations can train their own AI with squeaky clean datasets, the point is moot.
You don't even understand the point being argued, which is that corporations can't copyright a fucking thing that results.
>The dataset would be their copyright and so would its outputs.
The individual pieces that make up the dataset would be their copyright if they can actually prove they made all of its constituent images or other data-pieces, they would not own anything that the AI generates because the AI is not human. This is not a nebulous issue at all.
Yeah I'm not going to argue with you, you don't have a clue.
I smacked your ass and you're stumbling away rubbing at your red cheek. Get outta here.
The main gripe of AI is how powerful it will make already stablished IPs that will be everywhere.
I'd assume you would want to play my game and to do so you'd have to pay me my asking price. You could choose not to play the game of course but I'm going to assume in this scenario it's a game you want to play but you're morally against paying for an AI-assisted game.
supposedly AIs can program entire games for you so it should be a doddle to push the "make antipiracy" button and get a game that's very hard to pirate
>I'd assume you would want to play my game and to do so you'd have to pay me my asking price
There's literally an endless amount of games to play. When I want to pay for a game, it's because I actually deem the game worth paying for and that the developers deserve my money
Now tell me, why should I give money to someone who just took the easy path and told the computer to do the work for him? The less actual effort put into something, the less passion and dedication it contains, and so the lesser the chance I'll feel generous with my money
If AI slop games become real you know I'll be pirating them all
>The less actual effort put into something, the less passion and dedication it contains, and so the lesser the chance I'll feel generous with my money
AI generation actually requires a lot more effort. When you make something, you just want to be done with it by the end and get sloppy. With AI and how quick it is, you have the opportunity to generate and review a ton of things before you pick out the perfect one. This goes for everything, be it art, writing, gameplay, etc. Making something with AI requires a lot more critical approach than conventional creation.
>A-AI actually requires more effort-
Spoken like a true spoiled brat loser that never made anything of worth in his life
>passion and dedication are worthless and have nothing to do with the quality of a product
Spoken like a real bugman retard. Bet when you're not shilling AI you spend hours defending Starfield for free.
You haven't made anything in your entire life.
Wrote several short stories and made some drawings people on Ganker actually didn't mind. You?
>passion and dedication
Worthless metrics that have nothing to do with the quality of a product.
>literally dozens of SOUL/SOULLESS threads every week
>passion and dedication are worthless metrics that have nothing to do with the quality of a product.
Yeah okay, glad we finally hashed that out. So is it all just shitposting or are you having a giggle?
I could agree with your argument but when AI slop floods the world you won't be able to distinguish it from carefully made games. And let's suppose you could, it wouldn't even matter because you cant' realistically search between those 3 trillion AI gen games to look at the one made by humans.
>when AI slop floods the world you won't be able to distinguish it from carefully made games
this is such a fucking stupid argument
Why? Technology advances and at alarming rate too. Give the AI more years of data and space of content and that will happen.
People, maybe, but what about EA?
>this is such a fucking stupid argument
Anon right fucking now we have thread after thread of people insisting that every Unity game is worthless goyslop that were made possible because the barrier of entry was lowered too much. How on fucking earth would that not happen even more so if you could just press button for game?
the difference is i don't take Ganker contrarians seriously and neither should you, your first clue should have been "goyslop"
We aren't anywhere close to a button being able to generate a full game. It's nonsense. Even if AI was perfectly able to make game audio, pictures, 3D models, etc, a person still needs to assemble it, make design decisions and ultimately test and implement it. The AI is just an autocompletion algorithm, it's not capable of this.
Why do you think gaming will be flooded just because it becomes easier to make them? People will still have self-imposed standards.
he doesn't think
I'm always impressed by someone's bias, implying that someone couldn't make a game assisted by AI. I can promise you right now there are people working on games that now have snippets of code generated by ChatGPT. With a little care, I can generate a portrait picture to hang up in a mansion you would never know is AI. With ControlNet and Inpainting, you can redo an image until it's perfect.
Look, an image for a Strawberries ad in a video game. You'll never know.
what game engine is chatGPT working in
what programming language is it using
what code is it being set to work on
how does it know what genre of video game it's working with
>what game engine is chatGPT working in
Whatever you want.
what programming language is it using
Whatever you want.
what code is it being set to work on
Whatever you want.
how does it know what genre of video game it's working with
Whatever you tell it, or whatever it detects based on its data.
so you have no fucking clue and you think the tool is magic
Sufficiently advanced tech is basically magic.
this is a cop-out for people brought into writing a fantasy show mid-production who want to tip their fedoras, this is not an answer for AI generation
They sure as hell are marketing it like that. Specially the
>make your dream images with the click of a button...................
the dream image:
>In C# write a function that takes in a 2d point and a field of view to determine if an object is within that field of view. Feel free to adapt this in a way that makes sense for a game where I'm determining if the player is in view.
Have fun rewriting that 500 times to keep it working with any code you develop yourself bro. Code as simple as keeping your fucking character in view should be so trivial even leaving it to an AI makes no sense. You're starting from absolute basics and telling me that's an AI job.
>500 times
A little hyperbolic anon?
These strawberries taste funny, do not want
You don't like your strawberries M.C. Escher style?
I prefer my food MC Donald's
Thank anon
letting an AI code for you sounds like a fucking nightmare, especially with anything more complex than "make a web page" or "hello world"
>ask ai to code a shader
>it does so flawlessly
Youre poor. Use gpt4 for max coding output
>it does so flawlessly
>no proof against it
Go on, show me your chatgpt4 output
show me yours
Why is it that all advice/guides available for AI is such garbage? It's like a bunch of retards coming up with nonsensical superstitious rituals with no underlying logic to it.
you are the retard
>bro add these brackets and line breaks I swear it works bro
>no bro actually try curly brackets instead
>nah senpai you have to pray to the sun and write something that looks like code but isn't actual code
>ackshually try speaking to the AI like it's a toddler
Holy shit you hear about absolute morons who don't understand how programming works but it's always a shock when you see them in the wild.
I have Yet to start the Python tutorials I downloaded
You don't have to. The AI will eventually just do it for you. That's the best part, you literally don't have to learn anything anymore.
If a person didn't have the required grit and intelligence to make a game before you'll only get elevated to asset flip street shitter tier games using these. Two more years.
Actually AI has been able to generate music for a while, at least since the 50s. Strange how it never was highlighted until now, really.
What AI can code a game?
Give it a year.
Unironically give it a year or 2. You think you want it but you really don't.
yeah whatever, tell me when ai can flawlessly mod my morrowind/oblivion/skyrim/fallout games with a press of a button
The A part of AI is why it's never going to be good.
It's basically the vegan meat of creativity.
People don't actually believe in this AI prompter job right?
no there's a small cabal of dedicated spammers who can't shut the fuck up about how AI will be the future
I am not those kind of gays but it will. Just not a comfy utopia like these retards think.
Writing AIs are just Cleverbot given a fancy new label.
Just chill and enjoy the ride.
This is actually much nicer on the eyes regarding shading and shadows. Maybe it's the 'sharpness' that ends up being too much? I wish I could word it better.
mixsummersolstice is the model but it's blurrier in gif format, This is probably closer to what you want than other models though, the model is on the darker side.
Could be. I think this one's also pretty good. Like I said, I can't word it too well, so my input is borderline useless.
I get it and I'll keep it in mind.
It's almost a year old and he's the single most parroted person against AI-art.
Although this looks great because it keeps the style relatively stable, I love how the elbow bursts into small extrusions like some parasite.
Isn't it easier to render a still image of a background and have the character in front on a colormask-able background?
I just press generate and then post pic
There's some artists I'm friends with who largely stayed out of the AI debate altogether, but it seems like luddite tendencies are just innate in them, because most cut ties after I've tried to explain to them several times why and how they should incorporate AI into their workflow. These kind of people really are their own worst enemies.
>successfully alienated fence-sitters
>alienated
What do you mean?
Write a Ganker greentext about radishes.
Anon for the last time. It's not a tool. It's a replacement. When you admit you are using it to improve you yourself are saying THIS AI LIL SHIT IS BETTER THAN ME. At that point why would anyone need the fucking artist?
Ideally most artists would just defer to making everything through AI with just fixing what few errors might remain. Nothing wrong with admitting the machine is better, the retardation starts with not taking this information and using it to speed up the workflow.
This argumentfails because most artists don't it for money and nobody who does art for passion cares about who or what is better than who because there is no competition in art as a hobby.
Or maybe they just didn't have the energy to deal with your techbro gayry and obsession with AI anymore and did the only correct thing
I'm pretty sure that post was generated.
There's no merit in burying your head in the sand though. This tech isn't going away, they need to know that and be aware of it. It just pisses me off that I was brushed off despite trying to help them.
Oh so I was right, they cut you off because you just wouldn't shut the fuck up about AI and are too autistic to get the hint.
>These kind of people really are their own worst enemies.
Dude where the FUCK is your self awarness?
>does nothing but pester people with techbro bullshit about AI
>when people get annoyed or say they want to talk about something else you just freak out and call them luddites
>come to an anonymous dilating advice message board to cry about it when they all get fed up with you and stop responding to your messages
Don't preach about self-awareness if you got none.
>it's autism to talk about and offer viable solution for the future that would make things better
Okay.
Yes, techbros that worship current gimmicks tend to be fucking autistic.
This tech isn't going away and it's going to get better and better which is why they are aware it is a replacement and not a tool. They won't need to touch the pics either. And you really sound like an obnoxious techbro.
>And you really sound like an obnoxious techbro.
Explain why.
Some artmorons are terrible at defending their craft but this guy makes great points.
He is also a real artist and not some furry drawing twitter spamming gay.
>but this guy makes great points.
He really didn't but it's a year later and there's no point arguing them nowadays.
how did you watch a 40 minute video in 2 minutes?
Summarized it with GPT. Most of what he says is white noise and emotional arugments anyway.
Because you're probably being pedantic.
Pretty much everyone is already using some tool in their art but the conversation with "AI" is about generating pieces and to think otherwise is being pedantic. No one is complaining about the Magic Wand tool or Photoshop's decade old Content Aware fill. People do not treat the Liquify tool as the devil outside of feminism. Modern cameras have a ridiculous amount of processes and tools now that don't have everyone running for prehistoric SLRs Having one-click colour fills for flats is not the end of days. No one is up in arms over Blender plugins or that someone has to use a soundfont to make their soundtrack and the million other things that have made digital tools more efficient and effective. Unless they're in a cave beating rocks together or drawing on walls with a stick, they're not being luddites.
even assuming he's not trolling (100% he is, "luddite" is a buzzword) he clearly lacks the awareness to realize his ex-friends wanted him to shut the fuck up about it and to not keep trying to sell them on it
>xir doesn't have access to the bugged infinite gpt4 key
GOOD MORNING SIRS
>Actual indians on the thread
GOOD MORNING SIRS
>AI can generate art
>AI can generate text
>AI can generate (some) code
>AI can generate music
playing it kinda fast and loose with the term 'art' here, huh?
Time constraints mostly, I work to eat.
Might get unemployed soon so I'll load up blender again and redo some models.
AI doesnt generate everything
It steals from everyone and it mashes it up
And i don’t get why nerds are happy about it
People won’t get paid for the things they’ve done that have been fed to the AI
It will only makes corporate people more money because they can steal artists without paying them
You will get the same thing at the same price except it will probably be very repetitive once it’s used twice or thrice at grand scale
Ai would mean the death of creativity
Ai has never been intelligent it was always a mash up of things already existing, it can’t think
Calling out corporations is hecking communism and uhhhh not based ok????
For starts you have to understand it's not a mashup. You will get wrecked in court if you think that's how AI works.
https://files.catbox.moe/xrn4tk.gif
>the same indian from the other thread is here
Artbros... how you holding up? I think I'm gonna end up like Diogenes within a decade.
>a decade
you mean 2 years
I thought I was gonna last more for making and mixing music, but maybe not
You and me both, buddy. You and me both.
considering that last year was 2 years max, we'll see I guess.
Translator, I'm probably just going to commit suicide in a few years, once my savings are depleted.
That airplane pilot one sounds like aliens or something.
>GamerGate
>Trump Administration
>Elsagate
>Transvestite Epidemic
>Covid
>AI
What's number 7?
Pizzagate.
https://twitter.com/0xgaut/status/1701624127755337901?t=d3Dl8YXOGMvV5Kfvi3zMfg&s
I've been out of the loop since january. What's the go-to model to generate non-anime waifus nowdays?
working on it, i've got some ideas
https://files.catbox.moe/efhaa9.gif
rare footage of raita torpedo tit being born
If you dont mind me asking, what model are you using anon? What are your defining prompts for that skinny with torpedo tits look?
I've been messing around with cardos and abyssorange but I can't get it to really generate skinny busty girls. It always makes em either flat and skinny or it makes them thick fertility goddesses. I feel like it's related to some of the terms I use but I cant pinpoint it
mix summer solstice and it's a raita lora called <lora:raitai:1>, should be on civitai or gitgud. I don't need to share the prompt, that lora + that model and really generic descriptions "tall, long hair, big boob" will get you stereotypical Raita characters.
for some reason I didnt even consider using loras for body types like that, guess i'm retarded
thanks
Pretty hard to get that body type without summoning Raita
Good morning sirs
Have you seen how shitty AI art looks? NES games look a million times better than any crap AI shits out
Actual video game related AI question here: Are there any AI models yet that can match images of faces to given UV maps?
No it's probably really hard to do that given UV maps are distorted. There are some face algorithms that can recognize faces in pictures and maybe with some code you could have a search function or something. I assume you're wanting to datamine a texture dataset with a given face for search?
I know it will be hard since it's difficult to generate a decent dataset on which to train it. I was thinking of a model in which you can provide your uv as lineout or raw data, additional segmentation for eyesockets and mouth.Then provide several angles of the face and have it match the face to the correct positions. It's something I find very tedious to do when 3d modeling and I'd rather automate it to some extend. I find texturing in general tedious, although tools like surface painter do help with most common objects.
Problem is that nearly all training data would have to be either from commercial sources or complete garbage.
There's been some people who experimented with UV-based AI generation systems, I don't think they're going to be effective as doing some sort of unwrap texture projection system as we've seen with some Blender plugins. It's way easier to get a depth map and generate the face and paint it on the model through projection and you don't get distortion and warping bugs from trying to train from UVs. It theoretically wouldn't be hard to generate a dataset you're interested in as you could use existing monster maker character generators to generate thousands of random people and randomize the UV map layouts. But I think the projection map method has more legs to run with.
Doesnt' that blender tool do that? SD textures models.
how do i ai generate sprites for my shitpost game
What do you mean "now" ? AI has been able to make music for like 5+ years now.
The coomer gods are almost there.
We're gonna make it.
This looks viscerally disgusting.
>almost there
Try again in a decade.
>viscerally disgusting.
That's the best part.
/g/ood morninGanker sir, please keep the needful and spread AI on Ganker sir
>thread about "music"
>its just pajeets spamming the most awful slop art and larping "artists"
>not one vydia in sight
GOOD MORNING SIRS
Machine learning is a long-theorized step towards AI.