BBNDsisterswhat will be our goto retarded argument now!?

BBNDsisters…what will be our goto retarded argument now!?

  1. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Just being dead serious here, do you have anything better to do?

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      What else am I supposed to do?

  2. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    >Predexit
    pokemon is the highest grossing franchise
    >post Dexit
    Pokémon gets brutally mogged by Winnie the Pooh
    Sounds like BBND was proven right

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      third post best post

  3. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    I dont see how second place makes a difference honestly. Still an insane amount of money, but BBND is retarded regardless of how much money they're making. No other creature collector is held to this standard, pokemon fans just autistically latch onto a slogan from the 90s

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >No other creature collector is held to the standard that GF enforced for 17 years
      i wonder why?

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        because pokemon fans have crippling autism and unironically use things such as “a trainer uses charizard in the game” as a criticism

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          >side tangent about nothing
          you'd know a lot about autism huh

          Because it's retarded to force yourself to manage hundreds to thousands of creatures and every other creature collector dev team realized this?

          then don't let the players transfer pokemon from game to game, and for that matter don't program every single pokemon into the game in the first place if that doesn't matter, after all why would they want to appeal to action replay users who want to larp with their old kanto/johto starters or whatnot?

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            The fuck are you talking about? What does what I said have time do with being able to transfer pokemon?

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              why is was it even allowed in the first place if it was such a problem to that? why was it encouraged, actually? dppt has features that pertain to putting a gba pokemon game into the other slot, thus allowing you to catch rare pokemon and even rare items (such as for trade evos)
              why would they waste such valuable programming time on that if it never actually mattered? they could've made dp's engine faster instead, or increased the pokemon variety naturally too

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                Because it was more manageable when they didn't have 1000+ pokemon...?

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                yeah but clearly they should've been able to see that it would be a problem in future games
                why would someone willingly set up an expectation and then eventually fail to deliver on that expectation? if you had a friend that did that, you'd scorn em

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                >yeah but clearly they should've been able to see that it would be a problem in future games
                Which is why they set the precedent now before it became too out of hand. With swsh I could understand being mad at the natdex cut because you got literally nothing in return, but it's more clear with Legends and SV that they have been adding a bunch of new model reworks, texture reworks, animations, and environmental interactions to each pokemon and will probably keep adsing onto that in the future. So it's understandable they'd want to work with a smaller pool.

                >latch onto a slogan from the 90s
                >Picrel is from 2023
                Do they pay you shills to suck their cocks or do you just do it for free?
                Oh, that's right YOU pay them to suck them off jfc

                Do I need to explain to you that this photo doesn't debunk that the slogan is indeed from the 90s or do you need a little more time to think on this one?

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                It is from the 90's, but you posted as if it was left there when they still use it.
                >need a little more time to think on this one?
                Yes, (you) do

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                No, I posted it because that's what people are autistically latching onto. Whatever else you got out of that statement isn't my problem.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                >pokemon fans just autistically latch onto a slogan from the 90s
                >Posts slogan in 2023
                Once again, they are still using the slogan to this day.
                You keep saying latching onto it as if they stopped using it. What kind of retardation are you stricken with?

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                Jesus christ are you in fucking 3rd grade? How do you lack this much reading comprehension? The slogan. Is from. The 90s. It doesn't matter how or when they use it, none of that stops my statement from being true. I didn't say it to argue "it's old so why care xD!!", I said it to say people are autistically latching onto a slogan from their childhood. I shouldn't have to make this many posts for you to understand something so simple.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                Anon people from the 90s are still alive.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                >ummm it's from the 90s it doesn't matter if it's still used today it's old
                This retard would argue kids liking cars is autistically latching onto something from 200+ years ago.

                Pokemon is also from the 90s, I guess they should stop making games too.

                What the FUCK are you people talking about?? Its genuinely starting to concern me, this is twitter levels of incomprehensible garbage, I never made any of these fucking arguments. I said it's a slogan from the 90s people autistically latch onto, because that's literally what it fucking is.

                >no other creature collector ever did this
                >no other creature collector ever became as popular as pokemon

                The popularity isn't the concern, it's the genre and the amount of creatures

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                Are you dense??? Do I really have to spell it out for you??
                >there are no other monster collector held to same standard of keeping all creatures
                >coincidentally all these monster collectors do not achieve mainstream popularity
                >the only one that kept its creatures, pokemon (at the time) was a smash hit

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                Are YOU dense? Are you legitimately arguing pokemon's popularity was due to the natdex?? Then WHY would swsh, the game notorious for cutting the dex, be the second high selling one???

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                The power of nostalgia alone. Everyone here always says it; pokemon games can now get away with nearly anything, no bf, no natdex, no hq animations, no good graphics, no steady framerate, etc etc etc

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                >ummm it's from the 90s it doesn't matter if it's still used today it's old
                This retard would argue kids liking cars is autistically latching onto something from 200+ years ago.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                Pokemon is also from the 90s, I guess they should stop making games too.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Because it's retarded to force yourself to manage hundreds to thousands of creatures and every other creature collector dev team realized this?

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          >thousands
          It's been 20+ years and they *just* went over 1000, no game has ever had that many.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            digimon has 1500 according to google

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          By “managing 1000s” do you mean “copy&pasting from a database of a few hundred where sometimes you change older creatures with tiny buff”?

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >No other creature collector is held to this standard, pokemon fans just autistically latch onto a slogan from the 90s
      Probably the stupidest thing I've read all week. And I don't even necessarily care about bbnd

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        >doesn't elaborate on how it's stupid
        And you're supposed to be the smart one here? Articulate yourself little boy.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          he owned you little man hahaha stoopid stoopid

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >latch onto a slogan from the 90s
      >Picrel is from 2023
      Do they pay you shills to suck their cocks or do you just do it for free?
      Oh, that's right YOU pay them to suck them off jfc

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        I've had gays pay me to suck my dick. Didn't mean I got hard and nothing wrong with that, fuck you.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          >Wastes money on gay sex he can't complete because he can't even get it up when given stimulation.
          You should probably reallocate your gayry budget to viagra, gramps.
          Anyway, I have no problem with Pokemon continuing to be a success. It's disappointing that you idiots buy games with as much craftsmanship as a factory reject model, but that's your business. Even if they started making good games, I'm allowed to spend money on what I want to spend money on and I don't want to spend it on Pokemon games that don't let me have a complete dex. Simple as.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          and yes there is a problem with that degeneracy.
          No amount of gay echo chambers will change that.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >no other creature collector ever did this
      >no other creature collector ever became as popular as pokemon

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >i-it doesn't count!

  4. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Gee idk the 70 BILLION dollar franchise has fallen on hard times.
    You shills are beyond retarded.

  5. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    > what will be our goto retarded argument now!?
    THAT STILL WOULD BE HIGHEST GROSSING FRANCHISE IF THEY DIDN'T GET GREEDY AND CUT THE DEX!

  6. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Flaseflagging bootlicker... I'm going to be constructive here: you should have a nice day.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *