Do you play on 4k, right v?

Do you play on 4k, right v?

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    what? isnt that up to discord how it scales the profile pic

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >recognizes discord from an image like OP's
      troony

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >I can post a picture of a troony and you'd recognize that it's a troony, thus making you a troony.
        Damn, I have the power to turn you into countless disgusting things just because I know you'd recognize it.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Trannies are just incels that discovered a life hack to get a less shit life, but sadly this does include being annoying as frick.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          The candle that burns twice as bright burns half as long.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            The "troonymaxxers" as they call don't quite do the whole penis removal thing, and in some cases not even HRT.
            It's just about abusing the politics pretty much.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              They still off themselves at an alarming rate once their prefrontal cortex finishes developing and they realise they've burn all their bridges and everyone hates them.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >a less shit life
          >cuts dick and suicides

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            troonymaxxers as they call themselves don't cut and taking HRT is optional

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              and still kill themselves, cause its nothing but a self hating suicide cult

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        you are a worthless moron

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Soul vs soulless

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      unironically

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    CRT looks better

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      why haven't CRTs come back? there's clearly a market for them.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        More expensive to produce
        Big and heavy
        while there is a market for them, its not normalgay enough of a market for companies to give a shit.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        No there aren't lmao. A bunch of morons jerking off to glow and hum from CRTs are superior are not "market". And you can't exactly manufacture CRTs on demand to satisfy those morons either.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          there definitely is. people are tired of soulless modern tech which have made retro shit extremely trendy now. even vinyl which was considered completely dead has had a huge resurgence.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >even vinyl which was considered completely dead has had a huge resurgence.
            vinyl literally never went away and has always been known as the highest quality available apart from FLAC/directly listening to the multitrack
            have a nice day

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              i'm talking about purchasing volyme, not the technology itself you dumb moronic fricking Black person-prostitute.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >i'm talking about purchasing volyme
                right and it has NEVER WENT AWAY
                quite literally anyone who is even 1 big toe above the level of 'mp3's on my phone' has a record player and vinyls
                shops never stopped selling them and artists never stopped manufactoring them (not counting pop)
                you have to be 18 to post here, there have been like 5 technologies since vinyl and vinyl outlived them all
                there is a reason you dont see tapes AT ALL anymore but vinyls are fricking everywhere

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >there is a reason you dont see tapes AT ALL anymore but vinyls are fricking everywhere
                yeah, stupid frickers who paid 15k for a record player, arm, cartridge and phono stage wouldn't let it die, even though a digital recording of it was indistinguishable.
                They just loved their pops and clicks that much

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >accused of being a zoomer
                >response is to say that record players cost 15k
                you mean 15 dollars right
                be sure to cal your parents and apologise first BEFORE you slash your wrists

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                there's also the fact that people like vintage stuff, collecting physical things, and the tactile charm of vinyl. I know a lot of people in their twenties that have a record player and some albums just because they think it's cool (it is)

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >The resurgence in vinyl records continued for the 15th consecutive year, as revenues grew 61% to $1.0 billion in 2021. The last time vinyl records exceeded $1 billion was 1986.
                strange. how can there be a 61% year to year increase in sales if it never dipped?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >how can something increase (compared to the last year and not the 80 years the technology existed) if it didnt decrease before??
                1. very easily, its just called increasing
                2. you are only comparing it to the previous year (COVID)
                moron

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                i love how a single sentence is too long for you to read, fricking troglodyte. it hasn't been at this level since the 80s. what happened inbetween, anon?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >he really doesnt know
                they made these things called CD's which were cheaper to produce and more compact, hence the name compact disk
                for your average consumer who doesnt care about audio quality, this is good
                for everyone else, vinyls were still produced and sold, unlike magnetic tapes
                the assertion is 'vinyls never went away', which is true
                moron

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                nope, the assertion is "the sales went down".

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                see

                there definitely is. people are tired of soulless modern tech which have made retro shit extremely trendy now. even vinyl which was considered completely dead has had a huge resurgence.

                >vinyl, which was considered completely dead
                the above statement is not true
                learn to follow post chains newbie

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                so your entire argument is a misunderstanding because you're too autistic to understand hyperbole? expect nothing less from Ganker.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >COMPLETELY dead
                >hyperbole
                saying they're dead is hyperbole, meaning that theyre performing extremely poorly, but not actually dead, because theyre not alive in the first place.
                you cant specify that something is 100%/completely dead and then say it was hyperbolic, especially in a conversation where another technology (tape) actually is COMPLETELY dead
                you are literally projecting your autism and lack of social understanding lmao
                just learn to read like i said, you dont have to reply its anonymous newbie, theres no chance for you to save face even on a good day

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                so dead is hyperbole but completely dead (which is even more exaggerated) is not hyperbole. because you decided that's how it is. okay, that's cool. i can tell you were bullied in school because of how fricking dumb and autistic you are. dear god.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                google 'specify'
                if you specify that something is 100% dead, you cant then say 'but i didnt mean 100% tho' basic english ya shitskin

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                so you unironically and literally thought i meant the technology had disappeared from the earth and no longer existed because i said completely dead? that's what you're saying, yeah? and i'm the socially inept one?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >appeal to absurdity
                we're talking about the market, moron, not the planet earth

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Stop replying to ESL's

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                no

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >the highest quality available apart from FLAC/directly listening to the multitrack

              You mean apart from literally every CD since its inception. Just because people still buy them doesn't mean vinyl isn't garbage.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                i know from a quality point of view it's all bullshittery and esotherics when it comes to people claiming vinyl is superior to cd but there is just something special about putting on vinyl. it gets you in the mood to focus on the music.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >people are tired of soulless modern tech which have made retro shit extremely trendy now.
            Zoomers were born soulless.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Rent free homosexual

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Yes, you live rent free in your mom's house.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I pay her 400 (plus tip).

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >the most unoriginal generation to have ever graced the earth

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Shipping cost, muh toxic metals

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Actual answer is that it's essentially lost technology. It would cost billions to develop the infrastructure necessary to manufacture them again and in the end the result would be shitty anyway.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >Actual answer is that it's essentially lost technology.
          What happened to all the HD CRTs they were making near the end?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Because OLEDs are simply better now, and companies like LG and TCL are creating nanotechnology to make oled even better, at this point, buying a CRT would be worse than buying a 2021 QLED.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >low scale of production (jumpstarting an industry takes a lot of time and investment)
        >shipping weight
        >muh leaded glass
        >brittle glass
        We need SED and FED

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          It's possible to create an CRT tube with something else like acryllic?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            can you make acrylic in that shape that holds vacuum?

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              There are acrylic vacuum chambers, but not sure if a tube shaped one would survive. Also there's the heat on the electron beam itself i don't know if would work
              But i imagine its a fun project for someone with a lot of spare time in hands.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          SED's dead baby, SED's dead.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        More expensive to make and distribute also OLEDs have planned obsolescence in mind.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I wouldn't be surprised if there are some small hobbyist-centered companies that will start producing new CRT-like phosphor screen displays in the next ten years, but it'll never be a big thing again.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          MicroLEDs when?

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    No because high consistent framerate is more important to me.

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    No because mmo games have worst optimization ever and they run like shit at 4k while hogging 100% of 3080

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Of course, do you think I’m poor or something?

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    No i don't.

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It’s "You do play on 4k, right v?" ESL bro

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I have a small monitor and don't need or want a bigger one. Why would I?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Your PC should have at least 2 monitors, and at least one that displays 144hz 1440p.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        try harder

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    yeah, because I play with my face fricking glued to the screen
    holy shit have a nice day

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    In the living room, bought a series s and a 1080p TV for the bedroom after the girl left..

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >3440x1440
    16:9 gays see yourselves out

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Based brother. I was on 5120x1440 and returned it because I didn't like the VA panel. Currently using 3440x1440 for 2 weeks and already I want to go wider again. At the very least, I can never go back to 16:9

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        funny, I prefer 4:3 for games. Looks much better than wide screen. Even if the game has a wide screen option the 4:3 looks so much better. I'm saying this unironically

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Fair enough. I preferred and felt the benefit of the super wide format for work, but it was very nice to have the screen cover my whole left-to-right peripheral for gaming. 16:9 feels too thin/cutoff and 4:3 would feel even worse. Although saying that, I still play games with black bars on the side and have 0 issue with them lol

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      *sip*
      Ahhhh yes, post-processing on a 4k LCD screen, they way it was meant to be played!

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >been fixing my crt for 6 months
      >finally managed to get it running with some small issues
      >cant' hook it up to the pc no matter what I do
      Frick this shit. I'm so close. I can't end it like that.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        All these screenshots and clips were made using filters. I'm serious

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          What filter is that?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            the one where you can't let go of your childhood

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Royale with some ugly warp effect.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            retro arch, modified pixie. Looks better at 60fps, but I can record only at 30fps:
            shaders = "4"
            shader0 = "shaders_slang/crt/shaders/newpixie/accumulate.slang"
            filter_linear0 = "true"
            wrap_mode0 = "clamp_to_border"
            mipmap_input0 = "false"
            alias0 = "accum1"
            float_framebuffer0 = "false"
            srgb_framebuffer0 = "false"
            scale_type_x0 = "source"
            scale_x0 = "1.000000"
            scale_type_y0 = "source"
            scale_y0 = "1.000000"
            shader1 = "shaders_slang/crt/shaders/newpixie/blur_horiz.slang"
            filter_linear1 = "true"
            wrap_mode1 = "clamp_to_border"
            mipmap_input1 = "false"
            alias1 = "blur1"
            float_framebuffer1 = "false"
            srgb_framebuffer1 = "false"
            scale_type_x1 = "source"
            scale_x1 = "1.000000"
            scale_type_y1 = "source"
            scale_y1 = "1.000000"
            shader2 = "shaders_slang/crt/shaders/newpixie/blur_vert.slang"
            filter_linear2 = "true"
            wrap_mode2 = "clamp_to_border"
            mipmap_input2 = "false"
            alias2 = "blur2"
            float_framebuffer2 = "false"
            srgb_framebuffer2 = "false"
            scale_type_x2 = "source"
            scale_x2 = "1.000000"
            scale_type_y2 = "source"
            scale_y2 = "1.000000"
            shader3 = "shaders_slang/crt/shaders/newpixie/newpixie-crt.slang"
            filter_linear3 = "true"
            wrap_mode3 = "clamp_to_border"
            mipmap_input3 = "false"
            alias3 = ""
            float_framebuffer3 = "false"
            srgb_framebuffer3 = "false"
            acc_modulate = "0.200001"
            textures = "frametexture"
            frametexture = "shaders_slang/crt/shaders/newpixie/crtframe.png"
            frametexture_linear = "true"
            frametexture_wrap_mode = "clamp_to_border"
            frametexture_mipmap = "false"

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >retro arch
              I swore this shit off after I learned how awful it has been for emulator development writ large. It's a shame because I love how shaders are integrated into it. I've not tried to get reshade working on other emulators yet.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Shaders are the only thing a reasonable person would find useful about that dumpster fire.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Just use a LCD you pretentious larping zoomer

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Get a cheap HDMI to composite adapter.
        I got literally the cheapest shit on the market, the pic related, and it can even do super resolution bullshit somehow

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          I have a scart version of this shit but pc doesn't register it as a monitor and doesn't output any signal when you attach it.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      So somehow representing the same color inaccurately is better?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Yes.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Left is better, less blurry

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >images you can hear

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      That image was glorious seeing it as a little kids on a real CRT.

      CRTs have a real glow that modern displays simply don't have.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        It also had a hum which I do not miss.

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      [...]
      *sip*
      Ahhhh yes, post-processing on a 4k LCD screen, they way it was meant to be played!

      let's see how long it takes before the first loser screams, that these are fake or the pixelated crap looks better and as intended...

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        we all know that pixelshit looks better on a CRT but nobody gives a frick because nobody plays that crap any more moron

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          that's not a CRT anon, it's a filter. I do play that shit, IT'S FRICKING AMAZING!!! Nothing is as boring as modern games because they are coded object oriented. The most exaggerated example of that are ubisoft games. But I notice it in EVERY modern 3D game. Each enemy is a copy of the last enemy. Everything in the game is a copy of everything else. It's all so tiresome, bland and boring. You've seen one level of a modern game you seen them all. Classic games were not coded object oriented. Every enemy has it's own code. Each level can function very different. Setting up a new idea is the same work as using an old one unlike in fricking abysmal object oriented code. Frick your modern games. Eat shit, you deserve it

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Based. Modern gaming really is cancer, but I can't blame the zoomers for not knowing better, the early 3D era is almost unplayably ugly now and they're too moronic to run old pixelshit, which as you've shown looks like garbage without at least some kind of CRT filter.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >nobody plays that crap any more
          Holy mother of cope

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            i'm 28 and i have never played a pixel game in my life. If you play that shit you are a dinosaur.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Ok zoomer

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Pixel games goooooooood.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        funny, I prefer 4:3 for games. Looks much better than wide screen. Even if the game has a wide screen option the 4:3 looks so much better. I'm saying this unironically

        The LCD looks better

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I'm not sure what you consider 'fake' but the pixelated crap absolutely has fricked up color mapping. I tried s-curving and color shifting it to something similar on the right, but it's still not quite the same thing.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Arcade games have fricked up gamma art on purpose to compensate for the weird ass gamma ramps of the monitors.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            What do you mean by 'weird ass gamma ramps'? I know CRT:s had 'natural' gamma of about 2, and modern monitors are about the same for different reasons, but is this something different?

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              I don't think it's a CRT thing specifically, but that some arcades probably skimp on analog circuitry for the CRT driving, and that ends up with a weird gamma ramp they compensate via software.
              Contra arcade is a good example.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Arcade games were meant to be 'flashy' as in the screen was supposed to flash brightly a lot. It does this to be eye-catching. The graphics were designed the same way.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        thanks for these comparison pictures
        looks great
        can't believe people don't know about scanlines

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      does everything get darker when playing it on a 4k monitor?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I know my screenshots end up being dark because I have to turn off HDR. If you screenshot stuff with it on, it's bright and washed out like picrel. When I turn it off, I never like the brightness level.

  17. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >buy brand new GPU and CPU
    >also buy 4k screen for the same price as the previous two because DOOD GET WITH THE TIMES
    >all your games now run and look worse than before

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Even 1080p looks better on a 4k monitor, your 1060 isn't gonna last forever

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        how on earth does 1080 look better on a 4k screen than a native 1080 screen

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Because higher ppi

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            ppi goes down as the monitor size increases dumbass
            considering that you're talking about 4k it's safe to assume you have in mind at least a 27 inch monitor, which has a worse ppi than a 24 inch monitor

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >look worse than before
      ???

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah particularly if you fall for the dlss meme

  18. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    there's really no better shitlib/femoid/troony test than whether or not you're a 1080p or 1440p chad or a 4k troony... 4k is terrible. stop.

  19. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    go back to discord normalhomosexual

  20. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    4k? That's caveman shit now bro. 8k or nothing.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      8k is too big for most desks. You need a floating desk setup to fit an 85" 8k screen in.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >he doesn't have secret military 16K monitor from illuminati connections
      lol fricking pleb.

  21. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  22. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I don’t use shitty profile pictures for one. What is that even supposed to be, the fricking Zapruder film?

  23. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      just get a CRT lmao

  24. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    1440p@144hz with DSR enabled for antialiasing and clearing up shit like foliage is the true master race. you're not white if you do anything else.

  25. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      This looks fricking awful dude. Why would you turn on that flicker effect? Literally stop

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >flicker effect that only existed when you filmed a monitor
        Holy mother of zoomer.

        This stupid zoomer shit reminds me of that one horror game where you're in a late 90s arena shooter, and the happenings of the game are filmed on a VHS
        VHS in like 1999.............

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          I replaced all my vhs tapes with dvd in early 1997. Not to mention vhs tapes looked perfectly fine and never had any of those stupid artifacting and CA that people use in these dumb games. It only looked like that if your vhs player AND the tape was completely broken and about to die and no longer work.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            VHS looked like shit before DVD came along. That's why we were using laserdiscs.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              I replaced all my vhs tapes with dvd in early 1997. Not to mention vhs tapes looked perfectly fine and never had any of those stupid artifacting and CA that people use in these dumb games. It only looked like that if your vhs player AND the tape was completely broken and about to die and no longer work.

              The main problem with VHS was the shit color encoding.
              Way too fricking blurry

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Most people still used VHS im 1999. Consumer cameras were pretty much all VHS until years later

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >flicker effect that only existed when you filmed a monitor
      Holy mother of zoomer.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Thank you for calling this out.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      All these screenshots and clips were made using filters. I'm serious

      I actually had a 32 inch CRT growing up that I played my Sega Genesis, N64 and Dreamcast with and it did not do that fricking moronic shimmering effect what the frick, is this what zoomers trying to fit in think CRT was like? Am I being baited? Did you have a broken TV growing up? Legitimately boggles the mind. There's a reason people prefer CRT and it's not that stupid shit because that wasn't a thing outside of dying TVs, and I question if even dying TVs had that exact effect.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        you fricking moron that is a product of the shutter speed of the camera recording the TV.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          He doesn't understand vertical scan refresh. 🙁

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Who the frick would be playing a video game through a camera pointed at a TV?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Zoomers.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        It's "jaggies" from the post processing on the filter. I've tried removing it by using much higher resolution like 8k but then you get broken scanlines and the filter starts to look like garbage.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >I question if even dying TVs had that exact effect.
        My dying tv literally had one of the RGB colours disappear, I had to smack the tv to get the colour back. After a while smacking it would make another colour disappear until it just stopped working. I got an lcd after that.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        zoomers grew up with crts. are you using zoomer as shorthand for "kids these days?"

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >zoomers grew up with crts
          I doubt that's true for most. Everyone couldn't wait to dump their CRTs for LCDs. Probably only the poorgay zoomers remember CRTs.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        film your CRT

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Apparently emulating CRTs to zoomers is making them look as shit as possible

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      holy mother of screentearing

  26. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      oh my god please tell me you're filming a CRT in a dimly lit room and not seriously emulating games with that shimmering effect

  27. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    how did this go from a 1080p vs 4k thread to a CRT thread?

  28. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Sneed and feed.

  29. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  30. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Actually yes
    The games are not intensive so even my 6600xt runs them at 4K

  31. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >1080p60
    Why not just buy a PS5 at that point?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      He said 1080p60 not 900p25

  32. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Nope. Still on 1080p 60fps.
    Ignorance is bliss as they say.

  33. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    the CRT vs Clear Pixel stuff has NOTHING to do with 1080p vs 4K. 1080p is not a filter - its just less pixels. More pixels are good to have a clearer image. CRT was needed to fake the illusion of a detailed picture but through a blurry filter. Today we can have ACTUAL clear images
    frick off moron

  34. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    You do play on 4k, right Ganker?*
    Also, no. I play 1080p 144hz.
    Could I upgrade?
    Yeah, but I don't really need more.
    And yes, I've seen plenty of panels of all sizes, resolutions and refresh rates.

  35. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    480p on a crt, you dont need more.

  36. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >I play 21" 1080p , I don't need more. What good is better visual fidelity in a media which is based around visual fidelity?
    another Ganker cope thread

  37. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I DONT PUT MY FACE CLOSE ENOUGH TO THE SCREEN TO SEE INDIVIDUAL PIXELS YOUR TRIPLE Black person

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      So, you run 4k? Got it.

  38. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    always on 4k
    cant even play 1080p shit anymore just too blury on my big ass tv

  39. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >memeresolution which most games don't natively support
    Nah.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >4k
      >meme
      >games that don't natively support it
      Do you only play games from before 2005, that don't have proper widescreen options or something?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Do you only play games from before 2005, that don't have proper widescreen options
        You don't? what the frick is wrong with you

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >he plays games after 2005+2
        zoom zoom

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Look at the steam forums.
        In more than 50% of new games you have homosexuals whining that 4k isn't supported properly.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Name 5

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            No.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Name 4096(4K) games

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          I haven't had an issue getting 4k to work. In MOST games, it works without a hitch. In some older shit, I may have to edit a .ini or something. And in very few cases, I have to force the app to use its own DPI scaling (because I have everything scaled by 300% in Windows).

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >4k
      >meme
      >games that don't natively support it
      Do you only play games from before 2005, that don't have proper widescreen options or something?

      Even old games support it if they were made right.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Half-Life's UI is scaled for 640x480. I wouldn't say that it was "made right" if you need to tweak shit by yourself.

  40. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Frick off jensen I won't buy your overpriced GPUs

  41. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >ESL thread
    el burritos es tacos en chimichangas!!!

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      imagine being proud of only knowing 1 language and that language being the gender neutral garbage of languages, English. lol, lmao, rofl even.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Imagine being proud of having parents who hate you.

  42. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Why do consoomers get so mad when you don't buy into the fad?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      They want to feel justified in their purchase.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Sounds

      why haven't CRTs come back? there's clearly a market for them.

      I don't think CRT can even do 4ks

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        crt's dont have resolution in the way and lcd has resolution

  43. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    1440p
    prob gonna switch to 4k gayming in a couple of years

  44. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Is it just me or is OLED really fricking good for pixelated retro-games with CRT filters? I've been in awe at the beauty of emulating SNES games but maybe my old screen was just that bad.

  45. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    no i play on 240hz 1080p with an rtx 3090. its literally over for me.

  46. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    yes

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >playing on 4k so you can see just how low poly and ugly the textures are
      do 4kgays really?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous
      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        i don't know if you were aware of this, but it actually possible to select other resolutions on a monitor...

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Even ugly games benefit from nicer edges.

        which does what, to framepacing, exactly?

        It cuts input lag. I can't really tell, since lag doesn't affect me that much. I guess it's better with.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          holy shit look at that ghosting on the taxi cab
          did you use DLSS for this?
          can you not even play GTA 3 in 4k native?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            The game has motion blur. That's native.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Pretty sure GTA3 has that fake motion blur by default, especially on PS2

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Native stuff runs fine maxed out.

  47. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    1080p with a 3080ti

    all i need and will ever need for the next 5+ years

    Especially when modern games can barely run well on 1080p ultra at all

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >fell for the ultra meme
      ngmi

  48. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I play on 3k

  49. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Do you play on 4k, right v?
    No.
    4K is a picture for ants.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Must be terrible to get scammed into buying a tiny screen.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Not buying a 38 inch ultra wide 5760p monitor.
        kek

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >38"
          Like I said, tiny screen. 38" wouldn't be acceptable for a screen with half that resolution.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >38" wouldn't be acceptable for a screen with half that resolution.
            Are you moronic? Why would I want a bigger screen? I don't want shit PPI like your 24' 1080p or those morons with 27 1440p.
            Or do you enjoy seeing pixels?

            [...]
            holy shit
            post a screenshot
            pic unrelated

            Screenshot of what?
            Currently playing little BoTW before heading to my cousins.
            bigger image https://files.catbox.moe/5twq1d.jpg
            Runs like crap though. 29-33 FPS, but then again that's what the N!ntoddlers had to cope with on their hardware and they had 720p instead of 5760p.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >Screenshot of what?
              Of any game of your choice with your monitor's resolution, not downscaled. I am sincerely interested in how much detail that kind of res has to offer.
              I was bringing it up before, but have you tried Mordhau or Chivalry? They're first person melee games that have peripheral view management as a focus of the genre. I've heard wild ultrawide resolutions like that is basically cheating, but I never really saw any real gameplay of it by someone halfway competent.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Don't have any of those.
                I did a Hitman Webm long ago that showed 8K.
                the easiest way you can try out teh wider resolutions is to create a custom res, or simply run in window and drag those windows to ultrawide ratios.

                >Or do you enjoy seeing pixels?
                Always funny hearing morons who don't understand anything talking. Enjoy your 1440p garbage, buddy. I guess for a screen that small 1440p is alright.

                >Always funny hearing morons who don't understand anything talking.
                Ironic.
                Since you don't know what PPI is.
                Or do you hate that 5-6 inch phones aren't all 360-480p?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >1080p
                >obviously turned off anti-aliasing and sharpening
                who are you trying to fool?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                It's turned off on all of them. Anti aliasing becomes a meme at higher resolutions.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                oh no...
                >turns on SMAA and sharpening
                >now the game looks as good as 4k with a 10th of the rendering cost
                so higher resolutions really are a meme, huh?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Not really. Higher resolutions (with the display to show it) make it much more detailed (and easier to see said details). If you have a monitor for poors that's like 30", you might as well drop the res. I'm rocking the Odyssey Ark 4k, though.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                What the frick is that resolution, anon?
                You have an ultrawide yet it looks stretched like a 720P monitor jesus christ.
                Are you fricking blind?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                It's not ultrawide. It's 16x9. I have UI scaling turned on because it'll be annoyingly small at the 3840x2160 I'm running at.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                dude, fricking use darkmode. This crap gives me eyecancer

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >darkmode
                Ain't nothing dark in my life.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                you won't be able to see by the time you're 30

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                A curved 16:9 monitor is just fricking stupid.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                It's necessary because it's fricking huge. Also, it directs the sound pretty well.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Higher resolutions are a meme if you fall for the DSR meme. The actual value of higher resolutions is being able to increase your FOV.

                Like just get a load of

                Not really. Higher resolutions (with the display to show it) make it much more detailed (and easier to see said details). If you have a monitor for poors that's like 30", you might as well drop the res. I'm rocking the Odyssey Ark 4k, though.

                . Look at this fricking moron, using a 4k screen with max scaling so he's only getting a glorified 1080p panel at best.

                See [...]
                I don't post engineering examples for morons like you. :^)

                You couldn't even mock something up? Man, you're bad at this.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Like just get a load of

                Not really. Higher resolutions (with the display to show it) make it much more detailed (and easier to see said details). If you have a monitor for poors that's like 30", you might as well drop the res. I'm rocking the Odyssey Ark 4k, though. (You). Look at this fricking moron, using a 4k screen with max scaling so he's only getting a glorified 1080p panel at best.
                It doesn't matter on the desktop. No scaling in picrel.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I don't have to mock something up, when shitposting I don't have to prove anything.
                Making people seethe is the one and only purpose.

                Not really. Higher resolutions (with the display to show it) make it much more detailed (and easier to see said details). If you have a monitor for poors that's like 30", you might as well drop the res. I'm rocking the Odyssey Ark 4k, though.

                's image look good enough.
                Using scaling is what makes it usable.
                People don't want to use a magnifying glass to use their PCs, they want higher res for the clarity.
                And as he said here

                >Like just get a load of [...] (You). Look at this fricking moron, using a 4k screen with max scaling so he's only getting a glorified 1080p panel at best.
                It doesn't matter on the desktop. No scaling in picrel.

                The scaling is for Windows, not the games, but the clarity is still 4x of native if he's scaling it to look like 1080p on a 2160p monitor.
                And once again here

                It's not ultrawide. It's 16x9. I have UI scaling turned on because it'll be annoyingly small at the 3840x2160 I'm running at.

                is proof that "SPACE" isn't as important as clarity.
                https://files.catbox.moe/gy89x2.jpg

                dude, fricking use darkmode. This crap gives me eyecancer

                Better to look at that bright image than looking you.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >proof
                You don't have any space. Downscaled to what you actually see, you get garbage. Which makes sense, you're larping about having space when you have a tiny monitor.

                Scaling is for morons who buy the wrong monitor. Like you.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                my eyes

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah, it's revolting. But that's what this moron looks at on his tiny 38" screen.

                Well, I doubt it. He probably disables scaling when he isn't larping, because nobody could stand to look at 4x "virtual super resolution" text.

                We've got both sides of the spectrum here, a real first. One moron who downscales, and one moron who upscales.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Imagine being this moronic and autistic that he hates scaling so much that he outs his room temp IQ.
                Wouldn't surprise me if he uses Windows 7 and hates anything higher than 1024x768.

                >Text is fricking disgusting and pixelated as frick
                YES, such visual
                >Text is clear
                REEEEEEEEEEE

                That's you, autistic and moronic. :^)

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Why are you still larping like you even own a monitor capable of 2160p?

                >Doesn't realize his stupidity when he's knee-deep in bait
                Damn you're easy to fool.

                >haha I was only pretending to be moronic!
                Gets funnier every time, man.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >haha I was only pretending to be moronic!
                >Gets funnier every time, man.

                >Gets told he's being shitposted
                >Still bites the bait, and proceed to seethe.
                Yes, it's mighty fun seeing your mental gymnastics.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Even on larger monitors (like mine I posted), UI scaling is useful if you don't need all that real estate. YMMV, but I like 300%. Games themselves don't use said scaling, and that's my main purpose of 4k.

                Half-Life's UI is scaled for 640x480. I wouldn't say that it was "made right" if you need to tweak shit by yourself.

                I didn't play far enough to see the UI (as that shows up after you get the HEV suit), so that may be an issue, but the actual game runs fine and the res is selectable natively. I was referring to games that lock you in to shitty resolutions.

                of a moron that would use 100% scaling
                I mean, that's what you're doing. You're getting 4x resolution output and then you're running that at 400%. It's just an incredibly inefficient way to run 100% scaling on your tiny monitor while also letting everyone get a good laugh at your expense.

                I can understand the potential benefits of DSR/VSR in games. But in windows? Jesus man, you're one real fricking moron.

                It looks like ass, even on a 55" monitor. Sorry. I just don't need that real estate for browsing Ganker or reading my mail.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >>Even on larger monitors (like mine I posted), UI scaling is useful if you don't need all that real estate.
                UI scaling is a mark of a moron. If you didn't need the real estate, why did you buy 4k? Could've saved yourself some money and just bought a 1080p screen.

                >Games themselves don't use said scaling, and that's my main purpose of 4k.
                Here's the point where you hit pure placebo effect. Let me guess, you buy 4k BDs? You seem like the kind of utter moron who can't conduct basic A/B testing, which is why you scammed yourself with a monitor you didn't need.

                Ironically, VSR/DSR would be great for you. It would've given you exactly what you wanted, and you could've had a higher spec 1080p monitor for half the price.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >If you didn't need the real estate, why did you buy 4k?
                >4K is only for real estate, not for clarity.
                Are you fricking dense?

                Do you know why people buy cars with 400HP instead of 100HP?
                Hint: It's not to drive at 400KM/h, it's to make the driving feel good even at 100KM/h.
                >Car analogy
                You'd act just as stupid if it was a food analogy.
                People who get upset when present an analogy are also shown to have mental problems.
                >I didn't say anything about that yet
                Because I already did it so you don't have to bring that up and further prove how dumb you are.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Your analogy sucks because it doesn't take into account certain facts about the human eye and the way it takes in information.

                https://screenshotcomparison.com/comparison/30791

                Here's an image I made the other week. The first is the 4k BD scan. The second is that scan downscaled to 1080p, then upscaled back to 4k.

                There's not 4x of difference between these 2 images. Hell, there's not even 5% of a difference between them. VSR/DSR would've suited you perfectly, because you don't understand anything about the visual cortex, or how many points of light are "enough". This isn't a one off example, either. Any video, any game screenshot, it's all the same. At best, you will see a slight improvement in text. Anything else? 4k doesn't matter.

                4k is about space. It's not about fidelity, because fidelity was already achieved with 1080p.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Didn't open link, don't give a shit about BD.
                2160p on PC with 200% scaling in Windows to make the image a 400% better clarity 1080p experience.
                2160p in games for 4x more pixels to make it 400% more detailed, which is especially seen in the far distance.
                >4k isn't about space. It's about fidelity, because fidelity was not enough with 1080p.
                Fixed.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >which is especially seen in the far distance.
                The difference between 1 pixel and 4, especially when we're talking about you, a moron using scaling, is nothing. You have no real concept of what you're talking about here, which is why you're terrified to admit you even clicked the link.

                4x the pixels does not mean 400% detail. You don't know what you're on about, and it's sad to see.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Clicked the link
                It's still blue, therefore not clicked.
                Try being a moron somewhere else.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Man, you were that scared? Go on, take me a nice fancy screenshot of some shit game in 4k. You're so sure you know the difference, right?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                https://www.google.com/search?client=cuck-b-d&q=screenshot+4K+video+game
                There you go. Now you have over 99999999 images of screenshots.

                my brother in christ I can spend two minutes editing the css of this page to change all unclicked links to look like somebody in world 2 falador selling lobsters

                >2 minutes
                Well good for him.
                The post replied to was not 2 minutes between, nor do I need to edit css files to make it blue, I simply don't have to click on that furry autists links to prevent it from turning purple.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                my brother in christ I can spend two minutes editing the css of this page to change all unclicked links to look like somebody in world 2 falador selling lobsters

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I can tell the difference between 1080p and 2160p, especially at the size of the monitor I'm on. It's not a placebo. There are other features I like (the native sound system is shockingly good, the 1000 nits brightness makes HDR sexy as frick, it has other features like apps and multiview with said apps that are useful). It was worth the price.

                >buy 4K TV
                >not one single cable provider is offering 4K movies, shows, documentaries, all you got is SOME soccer games in 4K
                >pay for netflix subscription
                >enjoy sluggish blurry 2020+3 movies in silky smooth ""4K ""
                Nomries are fricking braindead
                4K is a fricking meme and i want to kill any subhuman troony who think this is the """"""future""""""
                1080p is literally perfection but hey i hope you enjoy your 704×480 dvd movies on a 4k television

                >dvd
                Welcome to 1997.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >>I can tell the difference between 1080p and 2160p, especially at the size of the monitor I'm on. It's not a placebo.
                Outside of text, I can guarantee you would fail basic A/B testing. I might actually make one of those one day, take a few screenshots of games, blur out the text and any high contrast UI elements, and see if morons like you can tell them apart.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I resized the 1080p PNG using Adobe's crap (lossless) and used the same method to save jpegs, since they're too big to post on Ganker as PNGs. Here's the 4k native (I don't use DLSS or other homosexualry) shot.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Now here's the 1080p shot scaled to 4k. Notice the textures are muddier (and you definitely notice it ingame) and the edges are nasty (you ESPECIALLY notice that ingame).

                Why'd you make your Shepard bald? give him hair

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Self insertion.

                [...]
                >hmmm I have a 4k monitor
                >what shall I play today?
                >a old game designed to be viewed on a tiny screen or a tiny blurry screen?
                EXTREME moronATION

                Looks pretty damn good at 4k.

                Yes of course, 4K oled looks incredible
                Feed it native 4K or 1080p integer or 240p with CRT shaders, it looks good no matter what, and isn't blurry no matter what.
                Peak gaming tbh

                >CRT shaders
                homosexual DETECTED

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Dumbo

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Now here's the 1080p shot scaled to 4k. Notice the textures are muddier (and you definitely notice it ingame) and the edges are nasty (you ESPECIALLY notice that ingame).

                >hmmm I have a 4k monitor
                >what shall I play today?
                >a old game designed to be viewed on a tiny screen or a tiny blurry screen?
                EXTREME moronATION

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I replayed so many games since I got the 4k setup and it makes all of them better, no exceptions.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I have a few UI issues like Hitman Blood Money, but yeah. Overall, better.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >I have a few UI issues
                Some older games need a mod to run smoothly but luckily there is always a mod.
                So far.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I have a few UI issues like Hitman Blood Money, but yeah. Overall, better.

                I replayed so many games since I got the 4k setup and it makes all of them better, no exceptions.

                until you play a actually really old game with no mod support what so ever or is a fmv game

                Self insertion.
                [...]
                Looks pretty damn good at 4k.
                [...]
                >CRT shaders
                homosexual DETECTED

                you sir are blind

                >Actual answer is that it's essentially lost technology.
                What happened to all the HD CRTs they were making near the end?

                patient trolling so it went down the toilet but whatever that's history
                too sad too bad almost 2 decades later and we're still using garbage screens that cannot replicate what a crt did

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                The beauty of my monitor is I can scale down my screen size so I can play games like you poors with tiny monitors when the resolution is low.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                lol
                >playing games in a tiny window because your meme screen

                [...]
                which ones would you recommend? i had a bad experience with my VA panel but maybe it's just because i bought an MSI.

                VA is dogshit in general skip it as a whole and other panel types aren't much better
                mini led or oled is the only solution

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                That's actually the first time I ever did that. I run my games fullscreen at native res.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >mini led or oled is the only solution
                aren't these really expensive and only in TVs for now?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                https://www.samsung.com/us/computing/monitors/gaming/55-odyssey-ark-4k-uhd-165hz-1ms-quantum-mini-led-curved-gaming-screen-ls55bg970nnxgo/
                Cheap.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                so like i said, it's only in TVs and really expensive.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                That's not a TV. It's a manly monitor.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                if that's manly then i need a girly sub-30" monitor.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Built for big black monitors.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Now here's the 1080p shot scaled to 4k. Notice the textures are muddier (and you definitely notice it ingame) and the edges are nasty (you ESPECIALLY notice that ingame).

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >scale 1920x1080 resolutuon to 3840x2160
                >it's muddier
                no fricking shit moron

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                It's going to scale on my monitor regardless. If I use some monitor made for ants, I'm sure I won't notice, but I'll see the difference in game. The point of the scale was to do a side by side. If you look at a 1080p jpeg and it's smaller than the 4k one, you'd be like "it looks the same!!!!!!1!1!1oneonetwo" But seeing them the same size (which I would on my monitor), you see the differences.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Holy frick, you're dumb. Here's what a 1080p shot would actually look like if you knew what you were doing.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Still looks like ass. Jaggy jaggy jaggy muddy muddy muddy.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                It's about 10% worse. Which is what you'd expect.

                The 4k shot isn't 400% clearer, like you thought it would be though.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >The 4k shot isn't 400% clearer
                It is.
                200% clearer vertically
                200% clearer horizontally.
                200+200=4U hundred

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >proof
                Proof of a moron that would use 100% scaling when the topic was nothing but using higher scaling.
                Thanks for proving to be braindead.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                of a moron that would use 100% scaling
                I mean, that's what you're doing. You're getting 4x resolution output and then you're running that at 400%. It's just an incredibly inefficient way to run 100% scaling on your tiny monitor while also letting everyone get a good laugh at your expense.

                I can understand the potential benefits of DSR/VSR in games. But in windows? Jesus man, you're one real fricking moron.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Doesn't realize his stupidity when he's knee-deep in bait
                Damn you're easy to fool.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                you don't know what PPI is.
                You're the one who doesn't know what PPI is. Hell, let's use your own examples. 38" 21:9 1440p vs a 27" 1440p screen? The 27" has a higher PPI. Digital super resolution doesn't mean you have a 5760p monitor, you utter moron.

                You're the one "seeing pixels".

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Hell, let's use your own examples. 38" 21:9 1440p
                >1440p
                The monitor isn't a 1440p monitor, you moron.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >>The monitor isn't a 1440p monitor, you moron.
                Alright, post the product page. I'd love to see this magical monitor that just happens to be 4x 3440x1440.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                See

                No.

                I don't post engineering examples for morons like you. :^)

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >1080p
                >obviously turned off anti-aliasing and sharpening
                who are you trying to fool?

                oh no...
                >turns on SMAA and sharpening
                >now the game looks as good as 4k with a 10th of the rendering cost
                so higher resolutions really are a meme, huh?

                Fun fact: You don't really need a 4k monitor to get a lot of its game graphics improvements. Rendering the game at 4K or even 8K then downscaling to your 1080p does wonders too. Arguably it is the conclusive way of doing anti-aliasing, short of actually buying a 4K screen.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                That is to say, to get the improvements seen in

                Don't have any of those.
                I did a Hitman Webm long ago that showed 8K.
                the easiest way you can try out teh wider resolutions is to create a custom res, or simply run in window and drag those windows to ultrawide ratios.

                [...]
                >Always funny hearing morons who don't understand anything talking.
                Ironic.
                Since you don't know what PPI is.
                Or do you hate that 5-6 inch phones aren't all 360-480p?

                , all you have to do is to render the game at 4K and downscale to 1080p. Driver settings allow this. No need for a 4K monitor.
                If you bought a really nice GPU but ran out of money to but a screen that is 4K *and* nice (super expensive), this is the way to go.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >Or do you enjoy seeing pixels?
              Always funny hearing morons who don't understand anything talking. Enjoy your 1440p garbage, buddy. I guess for a screen that small 1440p is alright.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Doesn't understand pixel density
                AMAZIN'

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Not buying a 38 inch ultra wide 5760p monitor.
      kek

      holy shit
      post a screenshot
      pic unrelated

  50. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Yes I do, though sometimes I wish I had chosen 1440 or something. I dunno. As a screenshot gay, filesizes for the thousands of screenshots I take eventually become a b***h and as much as I like seeing more detail, I do like having a consistent framerate which becomes an issue in more modern games. I don't have problems in like Hunt Showdown at 4k, but games that necessitate high framerate like Mordhau and Chiv2 definitely suffer because of my resolution choice and not going fullscreen borderless so I can downscale it to 1440 really, really fricking sucks.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      is that ffxiv? that game is garbage

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        It is not the best game I ever played but for my purposes of taking pretty screenshots it's pretty decent. I know there's Skyrim which I grew a taste for, but I don't want to put in all the effort to upgrade to Special Edition from Legendary, even though I can run it at 4k60 with my ENB of choice on (graphics card lifespan considered, I probably shouldn't). Plus, Skyrim doesn't have individual bone posing on characters ingame, I'd have to make a mod to have the poses I want; frick that. At the same time, frick paying a sub. At this point I may as well just download a shitload of blender scenes and start rendering.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      1440p 27" is perfect for current desktop gaming

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >not being on the 32" 165hz master race

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >165hz
          Not an integer of 60hz lmao, enjoy your shit framepacing on 60fps videos

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            what is VRR?

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Variable refresh rate. AMD has Freesync, and Nvidia has GSync.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                which does what, to framepacing, exactly?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                if you try to play at 60fps video at 90fps there's no choice but to display only half the frames twice. you'll notice significant jitter because some frames are displayed once and some are displayed twice.

                60fps video at 120hz all the frames are displayed twice so there's no jitter

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Something that won't on your video player or browser

  51. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >pay to beta test meme tech
    >get angry when devs don't support your meme tech

  52. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      is this homosexual implying that he is mentally conditioned to the point where he can't stop being stuck in the wageslave auto pilot unless he physically holds a gamepad?

      [...]
      [...]
      I actually had a 32 inch CRT growing up that I played my Sega Genesis, N64 and Dreamcast with and it did not do that fricking moronic shimmering effect what the frick, is this what zoomers trying to fit in think CRT was like? Am I being baited? Did you have a broken TV growing up? Legitimately boggles the mind. There's a reason people prefer CRT and it's not that stupid shit because that wasn't a thing outside of dying TVs, and I question if even dying TVs had that exact effect.

      That's because it's some homosexual trying way too hard to make it look like his idea of what old TVs were like, which is obviously overdramatic bullshit

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Im the same way. I have to use a mouse and keyboard all day for work. I have no interest in doing that in my spare time.

  53. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    1440p. Best of both worlds. I have both resolution and frame rate. Literally have your cake and eat it too.

  54. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    LCD, no matter what resolution, will never be able to replace or reproduce the look of a CRT accurately because they are different display technologies.

    No amount of filters, scan lines, or effects can display it like the native tech can.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      You know what, with how games are currently going, it's still just as useful to have a CRT as it was ten years ago. I wouldn't play a game made in the past fifteen or so years on a CRT but then again, would you want to? Just so long as you have a modern monitor with a modern resolution for browsing and productivity and playing whatever modern games interest you, having a CRT if you have a taste for classics is fine.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I'm just thinking of those arcade cabinet things theyve been selling for a few years. Without the CRT they are essentially overpriced emulator boxes running a really bad LCD.

  55. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    my laptop only has a 1080p screen so no

  56. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Do you play on 4k, right v?
    No. Because getting used to higher resolutions and framerates = need to upgrade more often if I want to play latest vidya without it seeming shit. I will stay at 60fps and 1080p for the forseeable future.

  57. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Stop being such a consoomer, I used a crt for current gen gaming until like 2008.

  58. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I would only get 4k for text rendering and reading shit. I don't see any reason I need more than a 27" 1440p monitor

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah that’s pretty much ideal. Chasing the latest technology will always leave you disappointed.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >text rendering
      Do you zoomers just not use computers or something? I have never, at no point, EVER, in my life thought "man, this text looks too pixelly". It just doesn't fricking happen. The value of 4k is more SPACE. I can tile windows all day.

      >Like just get a load of [...] (You). Look at this fricking moron, using a 4k screen with max scaling so he's only getting a glorified 1080p panel at best.
      It doesn't matter on the desktop. No scaling in picrel.

      >>It doesn't matter on the desktop.
      The fact you're using scaling is what matters. It means you're sitting too far away from the screen, which means you're wasting it. You have paid a lot of money for a 1080p monitor you can sit further away from, I'm sorry you're this moronic.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I'm about 4-5' away. It allows me to lean back but still benefit from the immersion of the curve. And like I said, the scaling only applies to the desktop. Gaming is fricking purty at 4k with HDR.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Oh I'm not saying it looks bad or anything. But it is noticeably better. Know what I mean? Pull your phone out and compare your text. Way crispier. That can be nice for eyestrain when you spend 8 hours a day on a computer.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        zoooooooooooooom!

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      4k has incredible usability for productive programs. At 1080p, programs and folders can get really cluttered. If you do any sort of modding, asset creation, or creative aspect for games, 4k is a life changer. I wouldn't even recommend replacing your 1080p, just have a second 4k monitor.

      is unironically pretty damn accurate.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Hardware AA isn't for gaming

        lmao who let the moron out of the asylum?

  59. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    you will never be a woman

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Thank god for that.
      Imagine being a moron all your life.

  60. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I think you stupid fricks are sitting too close to the screen and falling for the sheeple perpetual consumption plot.

  61. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >buy 4K TV
    >not one single cable provider is offering 4K movies, shows, documentaries, all you got is SOME soccer games in 4K
    >pay for netflix subscription
    >enjoy sluggish blurry 2020+3 movies in silky smooth ""4K ""
    Nomries are fricking braindead
    4K is a fricking meme and i want to kill any subhuman troony who think this is the """"""future""""""
    1080p is literally perfection but hey i hope you enjoy your 704×480 dvd movies on a 4k television

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >buy "4K" TV
      >Connect it to the PC through HDMI
      >Never connect TV to any network
      >Use UHD TV as your HTPC monitor for clear image and detailed gaming at 2160p.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >"""""""""""detailed gaming""""""""""" at UPSCALED 2160p
        >on a 4K TV
        kys you subhuman troony scum

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >UPSCALED
          Why would you "upscale" native 2160p to 2160p
          How would you do that?
          Care to explain how one scales 1 to 1?

          If I have a game running at 3840x2160, on a monitor with 3840x2160. How is that upscaling?
          Are you perhaps showing signs of dementia?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            name 10 games worth playing that have NATIVE 2160p
            you subhuman troony

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >name 10 games worth playing
              >worth playing
              Trying to make all games listed not worthy won't work.
              >that have NATIVE 2160p
              Every game with a resolution slider, or resolution setting.
              Half-Life 1 have native 2160p because it simply renders at the resolution you set it to run at.
              Open Half-life on a UHD TV and the resolution 3840x2160 will show up.
              If you use that, there you go. NATIVE 2160p.
              Do that to 9 other games and come back.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >durrr gaem meant to play at like 640x480 werks at 4gayzillion
                >uhhhh deflect deflect
                >cumback
                sperm whale

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                are you ok?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Yes but I'm questioning your dog shit vision that you think you need 4k to play a game with less texture resolution than a game with worse graphics than a ps3 game

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Meant to be played at 480p?
                That game was made in 1998, and my monitor that came before 1998 had 1600x1200.
                My graphic cards ran that game at 1024x768 butter smooth at 60FPS

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                there is a reason your own mother couldn't love you
                take your fricking meds subhuman troony

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              All of them. Rather name one game worth playing under glorious 4k..
              After starting to play on a hugeass 4k panel everything else looks like milky eye aids. Respect yourself a little gaylord.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      1080p content objectively looks better on a 4k screen tho

  62. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    i saw that post on reddit and laughed my fricking ass off
    jesus christ people are delusional, including (you) OP

  63. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    What's a good 4k monitor? Can my 3070 even run it?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      3070 will drive 4k quite well. I use the Samsung Odyssey Ark 4k. SEXY.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >what's a good 4k monitor
      A oled one
      >can your 3070 even run it
      if you play nothing but indie games and decades old games it sure can

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Do not buy 4K for gaming unless you have the disposable income to upgrade to a new flagship every year

  64. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    i dont get the point of 4k unless it's a tv or a really large monitor.
    If it's a monitor you're way too close to notice pixels.
    If you can your tiny desk should be the first thing you replace.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      ppi

  65. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    800p for Steam Deck, 1080p for PC gaming, 1440p for work, 4k for VR.

  66. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >1fps
    wtf

  67. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    My eyes max out at 720p

  68. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Do you play on 4k, right v?
    That sentence is grammatical nonsense. Stay in school.

  69. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I don't emulate
    I do have a 4K TV
    I play on a 480i TV

  70. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I want a new CRT release from Sony

  71. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Yes of course, 4K oled looks incredible
    Feed it native 4K or 1080p integer or 240p with CRT shaders, it looks good no matter what, and isn't blurry no matter what.
    Peak gaming tbh

  72. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    yes i play at 4k144hz

  73. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    lads, is it worth getting a 1440p monitor if i'm gonna use it both for gaming and work? i don't need a 2nd monitor and i really dislike my 1080p VA monitor so i want to get rid of it.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Upgrading from Black person1080p? Always.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Yes, it's a whole new world of productivity.

        which ones would you recommend? i had a bad experience with my VA panel but maybe it's just because i bought an MSI.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Yes, it's a whole new world of productivity.

  74. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    hello mr nvidia/samsung/lg employee

  75. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >reverse image search
    >first result is reddit
    Go back.

  76. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I been playing quite a bit of 240p since i got an HDMI to composite adapter.
    The CRT motion quality is not something to be scoffed at.

  77. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I just can't see myself dropping hundreds on a monitor.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >hundreds
      Picrel.

      It's about 10% worse. Which is what you'd expect.

      The 4k shot isn't 400% clearer, like you thought it would be though.

      Never said 400% clearer. I just said it's worth it.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >I just said it's worth it.
        Now that's an argument we can have. How far do you sit from your 55" screen?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          When I'm desktopping, probably 3' at the most.
          4-5' for gaming depending on mouse or gamepad.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            We'll take 4.5 feet, then. This gives you a PPD of 80. Given standard PPD is 60, this means the equivalent of a 1/3rd reduction. In order to simulate this, we'll resize down to 3200x1800 and then back to 4k.

            This is what your 4k actually looks like to you, assuming 20/20 vision.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              I wear contacts, so you assume right. Still looks better.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Still looks better.
                I mean, it doesn't. It physically can't, it's non-integer scaling so it looks terrible. Here's the 1080p version, 60 PPD adjusted for correct comparison.

  78. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    i have a 32" 4K monitor and I'm never getting anything lower res after using this. It's simply better in every way, no downside.

  79. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    4K is for losers Now 64K, and using a microscope to see enemies further and shoot them with an AWP at a 10 KM distance, now that's real gameplay. I don't enjoy my games if I can't see the mites walking on people's faces anyway.

  80. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Uh oh, I'm using 1080p, oooo, watch out Ganker both my monitors are 1080p 144hz, oooo spooky. I'm not using a 1440p or 4K monitor, oooooo.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      lmao it goes both ways on this moronic board
      no matter what resolution or refresh rate you are on, or what tech your display is, you're a boogeyman to -someone- here

  81. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Left looks better.

  82. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I own a PS5
    I will only use it to play games on 1080p

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      As far i know, the PS5 does super sampling when on a 1080p display.
      You are technically speaking running the games at whatever the frick it does to pretend its 4k, except using it to generate true anti aliasing.

  83. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Cool. But where are games?

  84. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    no, I still play at 1080p because I'm poor as frick, if I'm lucky I'll upgrade to 1440p the next year or so

  85. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Both of these are way lower than 1080p. The one on the right is like 100p

  86. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    What's the highest resolution monitor you can buy right now? 8k?

  87. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    No, my monitor is 27”. 1440p is good for that screen size. Any larger and I would go 2160p.

  88. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Why would I want that many inches on my monitor?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The kind of moron who says this is the same kind of moron who has 2 monitors and doesn't see anything wrong with that.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I don't see why having 2 monitors is like using 4k

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Having 2 monitors is like having the bottom half of a 4k monitor, except you have an ugly bezel in the middle of it.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        multiple moniters is better work flow

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Do zoomers not understand the concept of windows or something?

          Work/media consumption screen, social media bullshit screen

          If only it were possible to tile windows. Sadly, if you have one screen you're forced to always use it full screen on a single program or Bill Gates will eat your soul.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            So you like to turn your screen into two celphones on vertical, got it.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Work/media consumption screen, social media bullshit screen

  89. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    why don't mass replies get banned? why isn't there a filter for this shit, but you still can't say "nintenbro"?

  90. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    This would use 4times as much as computer resources. I would rather hav ethose resources used on textures, reflections, smoke and particles, lightning, number of enemies, view distance...
    Visibility is already satisfying in 1080p with good anti aliasing and a tidbit of sharpness filter. I don't care to see incredibly small thing or things that are are 10 km away from me. And even if I did, there is better use for these resources. Also they would need to make a monitor the same size as a 1080p one, like 22 inches. Increases the number of pixels, and increasing the size of the screen , does not actually make the picture look better; unless you step back away from your desktop (impossible for a PC player). It'll just make the monitor bigger and take all your field of view(which is bad for your eyes/brain anyway). And you would need to do a lot of rapid eye movement to look on the sides/upwards which would increase eye strain.
    But of course people who shill these technologies barely think about that because they only care about a gimmick to make more money. These things are never sustainable though, and will flop just like VR did, or the billion of other bullshit. Only good stuff stays in the long run, not specific weird and costly shit.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Just enable DLSS. That's what it's for.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >monitor is bigger
        >eye strain
        >more resources for little return
        >just use DLSS
        sure buddy, link me those sweet affordable 4k 22 inches monitors then we ll move on to the rest of your bullshit

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >It'll just make the monitor bigger and take all your field of view(which is bad for your eyes/brain anyway).
      Yeah, I constantly hear about people using VR with 110 degrees of FOV having their brains explode and shit. Make sure not to buy a monitor over 20 inches if you want to make it to your 50s.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        something being bad for you doesn't necessarily mean that it makes your brain explode flaming midwit moron. Yes VR is bad and you will only know once many people use it for decades. But you wouldn't have 10% of the general knowledge required to even have an idea of why it would be hypothetically true. Why do you play in front of a large TV on your desk, I'm sure It won't do any harm to you flaming moron. Life advice ignorant frick, don't assume anything you don't understand is necessarily wrong, especially when you're an ignorant frick

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Imagine thinking that "using" your FOV is going to damage you.

          Buddy, I hate to break this to you, but you're using it right now. All of it. Unless you're wearing horse blinders, I guess. Are you wearing horse blinders? Are you that terrified of the FOV demons stealing your soul?

          Go on, tell me how using your eyes is going to break them.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            eye muscles strains from rapid eye movement on long periods of time (playing FPSes...), you need the background around your screen in terms both of luminosity and depth so you look at other things that your screen, even looking at a monitor will frick your eyes and make you temporarily myopic but a huge monitor, or even more VR will frick you harder
            and further than that VR and 3D if used commonly like zuckerberg would love to, would probably frick with your spatial recognition since you would have trouble making the difference (the body has trouble making the difference and the fact that people have motion sickness with VR is a testament of it), imaghine people playing games/browsing 12 hours a day, now that but with VR

  91. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    No, 1080p is already enough.

  92. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >get a 4K monitor
    >it's a larger panel so it's the same PPI as HD
    >scale the output so the text and icons are the same size because you don't have microscopic vision
    >continue to view HD content

    >"There's so much more room!" (Not true)
    >"It's so much more detailed!" (Not true)
    >"I didn't waste my money!" (Not true)

  93. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    When I torrent shit like animu or watch YouTube I don't even use 1080p. 720p is good enough.

  94. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Wait, 4k has more pixels???

  95. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Yes. When I get tired of winning and feel like screaming "I fricking pressed it!" every few minutes.

  96. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >muh crt pixel examples

    i mean yeah if you're using composite cables on a game designed to use them as, essentially, a post processing technique sure it'll look better as intended
    this could be emulated digitally but we live in a failed society that can't understand cause and effect

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It's already emulated.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        hello failed society it isn't done properly

  97. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >4k
    Sorry, I don't do memes.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Your entire existence is a meme so kys.

  98. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I can't tell what that is supposed to be in either picture so you got scammed lmao

  99. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >not even a game screenshot

  100. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Why would you was money on anything above HD? 720p is the perfect resolution for gaming

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Tali's feet in 4k.

  101. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I usually don't. I do the majority of my PC gaming at my desk in front of my 1440p monitor, so 4K is out of the question.
    Sometimes I'll play games in 4K on my TV, but I can't really run anything released after maybe 2015 at anything more than 60 fps that way and generally prefer higher framerates.

  102. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    I understand WHY it's superior, what I fail to understand is how it's useful for me. Even on things that support 4K I can't tell a difference. There is no reason for me to want anything above 1080p 60fps.

  103. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I don't play with my face 1 inch away from the screen.
    I've found that makes it hard to see 90% of it.

  104. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Well you replied to me and I never said anything against your point. So like all mass-repliers you're a fricking tool and moron.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >awww, baybee mad that the mass reply button included his reply

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Nah, I'm fine with being replied to if I said something stupid. My post in the mass reply (

        Thank you for calling this out.

        ) had nothing to do with it though.

  105. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >have a shitty 2GB card
    >play all the games I like without too much trouble
    >don't miss out on any ultra HD or current-year AAA shit because I don't care about them anyway
    >anything reasonably demanding I can just keep on low
    >be happy

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Same bro. Its so comfy when you dont give a shit about AAA games and fotm crap

  106. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    The only thing I find good is 4K and if it has a large panel, as a TV
    I don't see the point of having such a large resolution on such a small panel
    Unless of course you like the approach Apple had with their "Retina Display" thingy

  107. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    CRTs is just when an artist draws on a shit monitor with shit color correction.

  108. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Why are CRT filters so uncommon? let alone proper CRT and not just adding shitty black lines
    afaik the only way to get a decent filter on games is with reshade and no one ever talks about it

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Yes they do, you're probably not looking in the right places.
      Retroarch has a lot of excellent CRT filters that works even better than reshade
      Although for both RA and reshade, the only CRT filter you need is Guest Advanced

  109. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    newbies trying to fit in...

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >downvoted

  110. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I can't afford the required $1000 GPU.

  111. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >$200 GPU vs $1800 GPU

  112. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >16:10
    REMEMBER WHAT THEY TOOK FROM YOU

  113. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Foolish, they traded frames for sharpness. Its all a trade right now, we're trapped in the 720p era until prices fall and you can go full 4k 144 on a big screen. We're getting rebooted copes from a whole new generation of 720p is fine for me, especially with valve creating a new legion of pitiful fanbois who have to pretend 720p wasnt a laughing stock when pc v consoles was a thing.

  114. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Same threads that are on Ganker are on reddit, twitter, facebook and all social media sites.
    Same comments
    Same pictures
    Same users
    Same times
    Same memes

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >being this new
      Anon companies have been paying shills on forums since the 2000s

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Its not a company copy pasting posts thousands of times. It's not a conspiracy, it's just fat morons using multiple websites and you all being sheep that say the same things hundreds of millions of times. (just like me when i said sheep and youve seen people say sheep hundreds of millions of times on different websites)

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Frick off shill

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Zoomers are unoriginal.

      (Also the internet and tech has been super-streamlined so that you're redirected to the same shit.)

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Just as unoriginal as you, comic copy paster

  115. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    No, on 1440P

  116. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    No, people who play at 4k are almost exclusively playing at 30-40fps
    >NUH UH not me
    Congrats on your 3080

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Sorry you're poor.

  117. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    i don't put my face this close to the monitor

  118. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    What will be the name of the Unreal Engine 5 game that finally gets everyone aboard the 4k train? It will be at capped at 30fps.

  119. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    1080p is the god resolution
    you literally don't need anything else, it's perfect for gaming, media consumption and work

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >you literally don't need anything else
      You can see the pixel at 48"+

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *