Explain this

Explain this

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Polo

    Why is he not real
    He would be my favorite pokemon

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I agree

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    a mongoose

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The writer said it was an error on the fault of the animation staff

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >the man who worte the scene delfected blame onto grunts who couldn't defend themselves
      Quelle surprise, he was already getting shit for hat he did try to do, small wonder he wasn't brave enough to own up to what he did do.

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous
    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >animals are extinct and appear only as legends
      Now I want to hear the "Legend of Mongoose" that Gastly knows.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Animation errors are common enough in animated media. Shudo was perfectly aware that they didn't exist and didn't incorporate them into the script. You're looking at an animation error from artists who probably aren't familiar with the series vs someone who was in charge of writing the anime. There's a reason those types of scenes pretty much disappeared once the anime had better control over its own production.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >There's a reason those types of scenes pretty much disappeared once the anime had better control over its own production.
          You mena in Gen 3, when TPC took over overwatch on the anime and they kicked the mentally unstable, bitter man out of their kid's anime, after he'd tried to write a pokémon revolution uprising?
          Yeah, because they'd kicked out the looney behind the wheel trying to make the series all about him, instead of doing his fucking job (he didn't have the remit to make a new 'mon, yet Sugi had to come along and fix up his retardation all the same).
          Shudo was a frustrated beaker, desperate for adulation but too mentally unstable to deserve it.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Regardless of how you feel about Shudo his blog is one of the best sources when it comes to the development of the early anime. I see no reason to doubt what he says. If he's telling us real critters don't exist and he doesn't write them in his scripts it's probably because he was told they don't exist.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >I see no reason to doubt what he says
              It's one man's viewpoint vs the reality of the situation, which is the events of what happened from when he got picked up to when he got let go.
              That he had a mental episode and went off on a booze and pills kick to cope (over something as minor as a gender change for a pokémon, unless of course Lugia was a stand-in for something else entirely more closely related to the writer than he admitted before he kicked it) also calls into question his telling of the events, as undoubtedly he wouldn't share his motivations for the trip, just that he went on the trip, so it's guaranteed he wouldn't share anything that could paint him in a negative light and those who know are too honourable to speak ill of the dead.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Indian elephants were referenced in Raichu's pokedex entry as recently as gen 7. The argument that "it's just a reference to elephant type Pokemon" doesn't work here, because it's a reference to a specific subspecies of elephant. So clearly Shudo is mistaken and real animals exist in the Pokemon world, otherwise Gamefreak would have fixed that dex entry.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You mean like they did after they introduced an indian elephant-inspired pokémon?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                No, the Indian Elephant was most likely a Pokémon. We know for a fact Pokémon uses terms we use in the real world and applies them to Pokémon like how you can call a Zorua a Fox and so does the NPC. I see no reason to doubt Shudo since he was working directly with the people working on the series. In fact after reading the translation for Tajiri manga biography I have little reasons to doubt him, not only because Tajiri himself starts to see Pokémon as being more like critters, in particular cata and dogs, but also because he rewrote the entire script of the game. It's here where I think they got rid of real life critters and why there's a big difference between the 1996 pokedex guide and what we got in game. Shudo was also writing for the anime in 1997 so this just tells me they got rid of real critters before the games even released.

                >I see no reason to doubt what he says
                It's one man's viewpoint vs the reality of the situation, which is the events of what happened from when he got picked up to when he got let go.
                That he had a mental episode and went off on a booze and pills kick to cope (over something as minor as a gender change for a pokémon, unless of course Lugia was a stand-in for something else entirely more closely related to the writer than he admitted before he kicked it) also calls into question his telling of the events, as undoubtedly he wouldn't share his motivations for the trip, just that he went on the trip, so it's guaranteed he wouldn't share anything that could paint him in a negative light and those who know are too honourable to speak ill of the dead.

                Again how does him saying any of that tarnish his reputation? Look at the production of any cartoon or anime, animation errors are common enough. The fact that he was aware of it when writing scripts is enough for me especially since he was in charge of all the writing. His own wild ideas like the revolt were his own.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Pokemon uses terms like "elephant" or "fox". "Indian elephant" takes it to another level because it references a very specific subspecies, and a real world location.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Don't forget "The American Lightning".

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Remember that real world countries were a thing in Gen I. The anime even featured real life locations so Indian Elephant could just be a Pokémon from India. I find no reason to doubt this especially given how openly real critters are mentioned in the 1996 pokedex, and it freely uses the term "animal", but those references are completely absent in the original games.

                He's an unreliable narrator and is only presenting a single side. Treating him like gospel truth is stupid, especially when the best of the absolute best, the peak of performance in any job or discipline (not just animation but life in general) can be brutally honest about their failures and fuck-ups because they hold themselves to a "no bullshit" standard, they lived or died by their own actions. All the rest? Find excuses, shift blame and in general skirt the reasons for the failure, as they're not so good they can stand up and 'fess up. The fact he pissed off Game Freak/Sugi by overstepping his mark, before then getting so big a head he thought he could make his own OC story, flying in the face of the whole concept off the IP shows he's not telling all that went on.

                In his blog he's posted old scripts he kept around. What appears on-screen is out of his control, that is in the realm of the animators, not on the script writers and, again, he was perfectly aware of the guidelines as he couldn't add flies or mosquitoes as part of a gag because they had no Pokémon equal.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                The Indian elephant thing is in gen 7 too.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Yes and they changed it in gen 8. Sometimes things are slow to change.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It's not something they would have needed to change, they would have just not copy-pasted that specific dex entry if they had a problem with it.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Game production is a big effort, sometimes things are forgotten or ignored. They changed in Legends of Arceus where every Pokémon got new pokedex entries.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                They're a multi-billion dollar company, it's the highest grossing franchise in human history, they wouldn't be that careless with their IP.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                He's an unreliable narrator and is only presenting a single side. Treating him like gospel truth is stupid, especially when the best of the absolute best, the peak of performance in any job or discipline (not just animation but life in general) can be brutally honest about their failures and fuck-ups because they hold themselves to a "no bullshit" standard, they lived or died by their own actions. All the rest? Find excuses, shift blame and in general skirt the reasons for the failure, as they're not so good they can stand up and 'fess up. The fact he pissed off Game Freak/Sugi by overstepping his mark, before then getting so big a head he thought he could make his own OC story, flying in the face of the whole concept off the IP shows he's not telling all that went on.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >before then getting so big a head he thought he could make his own OC story, flying in the face of the whole concept off the IP
                If Shudo was allowed to make his Pokemon uprising movie, the franchise would be known as a game changer for the monster catching genre to this day, just like Mimky Momo was for the magical girl genre, although Shudo claims the ending to that series wasn't actually his idea. And if Pokemon continued afterwards, it would end up as a higher quality series than what we have today.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Here's another snip it where he talks about ghost Pokémon not being ghosts in an episode made in 1997. Notice how he says he was told ghost Pokémon have nothing to do with ghosts. We know that's true today with things like the generation episode in Lavender town, Mimikins in the anime, Allister trainer card and the gengar poketoon. If he was making shit up it wouldn't line up with other sources such as the one talking about food. You would have to be specifically informed that ghost Pokémon are unrelated to ghosts by the higher ups.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                The higher ups don't know what they're talking about.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                No, I'm pretty sure they do. What did Tajiri envisioned Pokémon as? Dogs and cats and undead spirits don't fit the mold as neatly as a biological creature with ghost-like powers.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                They've said "Pokemon don't wear clothes" even though multiple Pokemon's clothes have been confirmed as actual Pokemon. They say "Pokemon can't do intricate human actions, like playing sports or playing instruments" even though Pokemon have done so over and over again. They've said "humans and Pokemon don't have a common ancestor" even though that's been heavily implied through multiple games AND would make Pokemon more analogous to real animals, which you claim is still a goal.
                They don't know what they're talking about.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Here's a Pokemon which wears clothing. Sawk and Machamp's belts are also confirmed as actual belts. Ceruledge and Armarouge are also confirmed to be wearing actual armor, which I'm not sure if that technically counts as "clothes", but it's worth mentioning.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                The guide is for 3rd parties first and foremost but that doesn't stop them from talking about how they handle the anime like the section about food and how they keep it ambiguous, which Shudo touched on his blog, as well as a section on talking Pokémon and how they handle them so it does tell us a bit about their thought process. But more importantly is contextualizing what the guide is trying to do, it's trying to steer 3rd parties to produce an image they want them to portray. Much of that guide is against humanizing the Pokémon and there's a section strictly dedicated to talking about real animals and Pokémon and how Pokémon replace real animals, the word replace written in italics to emphasize that. Again, it must be stressed that Pokémon aren't meant to be real animals, and this is a distinction made by both the guide and Shudo but neither of them put Pokémon away from the concept of an animal. Pokémon is fantasy but even as c fantasy Pokémon still wants people to perceive Pokémon a certain way.

                This is why I mentioned how Shudo's statement and the guide work in unison especially when you consider the contents of Tajiri biography. I already showed the page with Sugimori and Tajiri discussing what Pokémon are and how Tajiri's mind imagined animals instead of monsters, and in particular cats and dogs. A few pages later there's a section where it states Sugimori saw Pokémon as beasts and for that reason he based his designs primarily on real wolrd animals, it's basically stating that Sugimori saw Pokémon as animals so he used real life ones as the main inspiration. Things like that open a lot up and the things Shudo says and the Guide says start to make sense. If real animals were done away fairly early, and if the guide has certain guidelines for a specific reason and you consider what Tajiri biography says it all starts to work in unison. There's a reason people perceive Pokémon as animals more often than monsters.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                If "Pokemon are pets" is blindly and religiously adhered to, rather than just used as a default state or template, it makes the series worse. Many of the most touching scenes are the ones where Pokemon are being portrayed as something beyond just cute little pets. Obsessively following these arbitrary restrictions regarding how Pokemon can be portrayed has no tangible benefit for the franchise.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Pokemon being pets is coded in the DNA of this series. There's a reason Pokémon do certain things and why the games have you interact with Pokémon a certain way. I said many posts ago there was a reason that in HGSS they programmed Pokémon to do certain things, actions associated with domestic animals such as barking, chewing on things like grass and shoes among other things, and that's because they want to construct Pokémon being like pets, like cats and dogs. Amie with being able to pet your Pokémon, groom them and feed them treats, SwSh camp lets you play fetch with your Pokémon, a game activity associated with dogs even in ancient times, and you get their attention with a toy modeled directly after a real life cat toy. Legends of Arceus has Pokémon behave like cute little pets when outside their Pokéball like doing their cry to get your attention and doing cute little poses, they even fall asleep on the floor just like a cute cat or dog after a short while, they also have cute interactions with each other where they communicate with their cries which the player can't understand. In Scarlet and Violet you get to wash and clean your Pokémon just as people do with real pets. Even in the anime the type of food Pokémon eat take after animal feed people feed their dogs and cats in the real world.

                This is all intentional. In a book Tajiri wrote in 1995 he refers to Pokémon as "kaiju-like pets". The 1996 Pokedex book refers to Pokémon as being better pets than cats and dogs. Indeed Tajiri biography from 2018 has a page dedicated when Pokémon started to form from the capsule monsters concept and there's a section where Tajiri tells Sugimori of Pokémon being like pets, or as he specifically says "cats and dogs".

                Pokémon is the highest grossing franchise, it achieved that ovr older series. In no small part, in my opinion, due to friendly creature designs as well as a deliberate construction of Pokémon as distant yet very familiar creatures.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >All Pokemon need to be pets, there can't be any variance, because it's upsetting to me when things aren't uniform and predictable.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                That's not up to me. I don't get upset because I don't make fictional cute little critters a part of my sexual identity. You can ignore the man who came up with the concept saying as such, and think that he himself wanted people to know that he came up with the idea of Pokémon being like critters, in this case more like cats and dogs. You can ignore all the many ways the series constructs Pokémon to be pets and how that's a core aspect of this franchise. But you won't because you want this series to appease to your inanity but it won't do that. Based on Tajiri's own biography, Shudo's writings on Pokémon and the product approval guide it's not unrelated at all to come to terms that Pokémon are really innocent and sweet critters that make good pets. They will never be what you want them to be, either come to terms with that and stick to fan fiction or continue to cope that this series constructs Pokémon as being pets at their core much like Tajiri told Sugimori.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >I don't get upset because I don't make fictional cute little critters a part of my sexual identity.
                In my last post, I implied you had autism. Now I realize I was wrong to do that, you're clearly not autistic. I see now that you're actually schizo.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                All that is for third party merchandise partners. First party devs can do almost whatever they want.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                The common ancestor thing wasn't.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >ghost Pokémon have nothing to do with ghosts
                >These Zorua migrated to the Hisui region after being driven from other lands by humans, who shunned the Pokémon for manifesting uncanny illusions. But the Zorua perished, unable to survive the harsh Hisuian environment and strife with other Pokémon. Their lingering souls were reborn in this Ghost-type form through the power of their malice toward humans and Pokémon.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >reborn
                >re·born
                /rēˈbôrn/
                Learn to pronounce
                adjective
                brought back to life or activity.
                "the grand concourse stands reborn as a four-star restaurant"

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >This lingering soul of a dead creature given physical form through its hatred isn't a ghost even though that description fits many ghost stories because.. uhhh... because of a word choice!
                >Heh. I'm so smart and right.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It says that their lingering souls were reborn. They're alive, but keep ignoring all lore saying otherwise.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I didn't say he wasn't told specifics, I'm saying he's not worth holding up as a paragon of anything, especially when he was too fucking stupid to look outside and see he fad wasn't dying and they may want to continue shillng the brand. His passive-aggressive tone in referring to the citinuation of the series ("I don't know how the current set treats pokémon food" as if TPC hadn't briefed them like Game freak briefed him about handling food when he started) just further sets my bullshit sensor off, TPC took over to better homologate it to the rest of the brand and decided this man wasn't the man able to take it forward from there. For why, I don't knnow but again, stepping on GF desiggners' toes and pitching an idea to kill the anime surely couldn't have helped his case, never mind the drug episode too (Japanese workpaces are high stress and having someone fragile enough to have cracked once is only asking for trouble if they crack again).
                I'm sorry you think the writer of the toy advert is on the level of Sugi, Morimoto, Masuda, Tajiri or the rest of the Gen 1 Pokémon crew but he was too old to wrap his head around the concept material, due to being too old to experience home video games to the point they'd become an important part of his off-time.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I don't think he's on that level, but it's a disservice to not recognize how much of an impact the anime had on the success of Pokémon to the point that they made a version of the games closer to the anime and some Pokémon like Audino being created in part because of the anime. And of course he wrote that, he left the anime in 2002 and he wrote his blogs on Pokémon from 2008 to 2010. He wouldn't have any idea on how the current anime handles things but it's still the same as he wrote in his blog, he wasn't being passive aggressive.

                Even so his blog is a treasure trove to people wanting to learn about the development of the early anime since he talks about his time writing for the anime from 1997 to 2002. And as I said, there's no reason to doubt the things he writes when it comes to the development of the anime. The food example and ghost one show that he clearly was told how to handle things. This is an interview from 2000 with Ishihara and Tajiri and Shudo mentions this scenario in his blog. He writes that the meeting was to decide to have a Pokémon being able to talk to have a way for the audience to understand Pokémon. He basically says Meowth was created for the audience to know what Pokémon are saying hence why he shows up in every episode. I forgot the reason on why they settled for meowth for the talking role, ill have to look up my notes. But the point is that Shudo's blog is invaluable because, afaik, he's the only source we have at length from someone in an important position. This is why I trust his word on the issue with crap like the OP.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Here it is. Tajiri in the interview also mentions he would've made the anime closer to the games meaning no talking meowth seeing as they got rid of his ability to talk in the games.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                And here's a section of the interview showing that they were briefed by the creators and told to play the games first, which is also written about on the blog. It's clear that while the anime team could do their own thing to some extend they were still under the supervision of the series creators. So when Shudo writes that things like the OP are animation errors and how he kept elements like the OP away from his scripts I trust the word of the headwriter over that of an animation scene that is most likely an animation error.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              I don't know if I'm remembering wrong but I fucking swear humans are seen drinking Moo Moo Milk in the anime and there was that episode in the first seasons where they used Parasect and Paras mushrooms to make potions.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You are correct

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                ok

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Shudo is saying that they don't want kids to think people kill and eat Pokémon or that Pokémon eat each other. I think thats what the guide is pretty much implying hence why it mentions that they keep things ambiguous on purpose. Shudo knows that the whole thing is silly and that people are going to see thought it but that's the rules.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >they don't want kids to think people kill and eat Pokémon or that Pokémon eat each other.
                That would have been good, but they talk about and show Pokemon predation constantly throughout the entire franchise.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                That's mostly confined to pokedex entries and sometimes implied but it's something that's never shown. Remember, Sugimori admitted that they ignore pokedex entries when making and writing the games even if since Gen I most of them had predator and pray relationships. The anime pretty much steers clear of that hence why Shudo said they kept the Pokémon eating Pokémon aspect unknown.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                They show a Cramorant trying to eat an Arrokuda in Secrets of the Jungle. Sword and Shield and shows Pokemon body parts cooked into food. So yes, unfortunately, it's entirely canon that Pokemon kill and eat each other, and that humans kill and eat Pokemon.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Was he the Lugia guy?

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Yes.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              He also wanted to make the third movie about a T-Rex skeleton that comes to life and almost destroys the world until Ash and his friends stop it. The idea apparently got shut down not because it broke the lore or stepped out of bounds, but because “the idea of an inanimate object coming to life is boring”.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >but because “the idea of an inanimate object coming to life is boring
                Maybe that was just an excuse?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                no

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            PETA stole Shudo's idea.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >after he'd tried to write a pokémon revolution uprising?
            NOOOOO! YOU CAN'T JUST DECONSTRUCT THE POKEMON AS CHARACTERS, THEY CAN ONLY BE LE HECKIN COMEDIC COLLECTIBLE CRITTERS! I'M GOING INSANE, SAVE ME TAJIRI-SAMA!!!

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          The writer said it was an error on the fault of the animation staff

          >ordered to draw Zapdos or some shit
          >draws a mangoose instead

          How could this even happen?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            the keys are right next to each other

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          We have Buzzwole now. We can depict two or three of them flexing as they walk circles around a single Slowpoke.

          Later on we have the move Infestation, and Vespiquen's 'grubs'.

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Shudo was a hack.

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >animals don't exist in the pokemon univers-ACK

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    the anime being non canon

    that shit would make a fine pokemon tho

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >have a move in the game that literally shits out an egg for your pokemon to eat
    >NO EGGS
    >ONLY EAT PLANTS
    >IGNORE THE SENTIENT PLANT CREATURES
    >MEAT BAD
    >IT JUST IS OK
    >12-16 SERVINGS OF BREAD PER DAY
    i hate the vegan agenda
    i hate the vegan agenda
    i hate the vegan agenda
    i hate the vegan agenda

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      But humans eat pokemon in gen 7, shamelessly too. They also mention pokemon eating each others

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I've been in snake threads enough to know where this is going

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    it's a yungoos, trainers just cpuldn't identify it beyond the vague silhouette because Silph hadn't invented the alola scope yet

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Proto-sneasel.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      are those sprites all real?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Yes
        source: my dad is gamefreak

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Watch the soul drip away.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        More like it gaining a lot of soul and a demonic one also

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Why is one of them a Sonic

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        More like a mini Gengar
        It has the same smile of banette too

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Look at the spines
          That’s just Sonic’s hair, it’s got the silhouette and everything

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Originally the head feather was an actual ice splinter and the tails too. Made much more sense for its ice type. Why they hell they changed that?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Those first three are so much better

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      2nd one is best

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Kantonian Gumshoos

  13. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    That's Zangoose, you know just like they retconned Fairy type

  14. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    its a real pokemon my dad works at nintendo he says its real you can catch one in pokemon its super duper rare they are good at hiding

  15. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Ekans needs to lay off the drugs.

  16. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    the anime will never dictate the canon i dunno why you guys cling to the anime so hard

  17. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Beta Zangoose

  18. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Beta sneasel

  19. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  20. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Lore was different back then. Deal with it.

  21. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I refuse to believe anyone here is fucking retarded enough to think the early appearances of animals in the anime are anything but a fucking mistake just like how much of a fucking mistake referencing the death of pokemon was with lavender town

    Anyone thinking pokemon has any fucking deep lore at all that explains why real life animals do not appear or any of that needs to leave this site, as people under 18 are not allowed to post

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Stoutland died

  22. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Its an undiscovered type of pokemon. If tauros is a "wild bull" pokemon this is like a "mongoose" pokemon. Every prof in every game is always prattling on about how many undiscovered species are out there, which is why they give you a pokedex in the first place.
    The same explanation can be used for those butterflies Ash sees in the first ep as well.
    Boom done.

  23. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What it's just a Youngoos

  24. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    penis

  25. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Kantonian Yungoos

  26. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    none of this shit makes sense, because the pokemon descriptions suggest animals exist anyway. pikachu is the 'mouse' pokemon, tentacool being the 'jellyfish' pokemon. you could argue mankey is the most being egregious one, considering its the 'pig monkey' pokemon, referencing two animals.

  27. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  28. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Pokemon are animals
    >Pokephiles are zoophiles
    >OP is a fag

  29. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    the indian elephant was retconned to copperajah in legends arceus dex entry too, no idea if anyone mentioned it already

  30. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It's a hallucination caused by a ghost.

Your email address will not be published.