>filters Type 4 "fans" by being a good and challenging racing game and not a e s t h e t i c twitter bait
>filters Type 4 "fans" by being a good and challenging racing game and not a e s t h e t i c twitter bait
>filters Type 4 "fans" by being a good and challenging racing game and not a e s t h e t i c twitter bait
I like both. Most people do.
the only ridge racer that filters people is the first one, even I got filtered because it's an arcade racer with no force feedback
The first one is one of my favorites, it's just pure arcade goodness and the soundtrack is nuts. To be fair the original arcade machine has force feedback IIRC; you just can't get it at home since before RR the Playstation didn't even have an analog controller, nevermind a full wheel with feedback.
You're incorrect, force feedback first appeared in Rave Racer.
My mistake, sorry. The only RR physical cabinet I've ever played was one of the RR-to-RR2 retrofit ones.
Twitter didn't exist in 1999 you stupid f&*k.
great thread, op
Do any of these ridge racer games take advantage of janky physics?
Ridge racer is ridge racer.
The shnozberries taste like shnozberries
Exactly.
B'woah. Can I play this with FFB? I'm sure I have it but I never had a wheel at the time.
No idea as i've never tried.
R4 had better gameplay though.
>sandbagging as replayability
Not retro
>twitter bait
wtf does that even mean!? people can't like r4 because you browse twitter an unhealthy amount? listen how autistic you sound, homie