I hate them with a passion
Souls games are the most soulless, shallow and unfun a game can be.
>depressing color palette
>boring af
>linear
>no interesting features
>dark edgy shitty story and theme
>GARBAGE combat gameplay
>GARBAGE character animations
>shitty graphics, shitty engine
>they have a mania for useless
visual details and in the end it looks like a pile of shit or mud.
>muh hardcore difficulty
These games are ez and cheap to make and earn big money, that's why they are everywhere now, because of you homosexuals who buy this shit. That disaster BFF made by 3 troons is the height of it
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
margit gud
name 3 action RPGs with better combat and presentation
Dragon's Dogma
Dragon Age Inquisition
Nier Automata
Dragon's Dogma is on par with DS1, the other 2 are gutter trash. Try again.
bassssseeddd
more RPG than action
worthless trash
good action game
i kneel
Hating popular things doesn't make you interesting.
>ez and cheap to make
Shut the frick up talentless homosexual
stick to switch bing bing wahoo, kid
>stick to switch bing bing wahoo, kid
>t. Unironic Player of WoW
Also I didn't read anything you wrote.
If you don't like it, don't play. Simple as that. 🙂
Hijacking this thread to ask about Bloodborne.
I don't know where to go. I can't spatially map this game unlike other souls games. I must have restarted the game 20 times already because I get to the Cathedral Ward, get confused, and give up. Pick it up again a few months later, repeat.
I've been doing this since 2017. I tried giving walkthroughs like FightingCowboy a chance so I can finally beat the game, but then it's fricking boring because I'm not actually "playing" it.
You can progress in practically any direction out of Cathedral Ward, anon.
>linear
souls games have plenty of non-linearity though. Dark Souls 3 is arguably the most linear but even it has a decent amount of choice in terms of which area you go next at certain points.
>Linear
Linear is good
Back to hogwarts Black person
Dark Souls poisoned action adventure game
Hollow Knight poisoned action platforming game
Stardew Valley poisoned farming game
Undertale poisoned indie game as a whole
>Stardew Valley poisoned farming game
My sister who was a massive Harvest Moon fan hated Stardew Valley basically said it was a Friends of Mineral Town knockoff but more jank and ugly.
your sister has horrendous god awful bottom of the barrel taste
>Harvest Moon, Story of Season, and Rune Factory all killed themselves
>i-it's all Stardew Valley's fault
You'll never be a Japanese, you dumbfrick moronic weeb. Kys. Subhumans like you are the reason Marvelous could get away with charging $60 for the dumpsterfire that are SoS: PoOT and RF5.
ok homosexual. you have what is called shit taste.
What annoys me about Souls is they're basically a parody of what many beleive "old difficult games" were like, yeah old games tended be less handholding and difficult but no they weren't total moronic bullshit where enemies clip through walls and read your button inputs or were so obtuse that stuff was basically impossible to figure it out without looking online.
Yes they were.
There were plenty of old games with total moronic bullshit. Sierra games would literally be unbeatable if you made the wrong choices.
Old games were good when they were good, but 90% were total moronic bullshit.
You only played Good old games. I have played Bad old games. And let me tell you, there were definitely enemies clipping through walls and reading your button inputs. Many fighting games did the latter for example, and some still do.
So you agree Souls is bad then?
>so obtuse that stuff was basically impossible to figure it out without looking online.
There was actually a lot of that. There are two prime differences:
A) strat guides existed, toll-cost tip lines existed. If you got stuck money bought you options, which is a shitty thing, but still a thing. However-
B) Players didn't throw their hands up after two tries and go "THAT'S IT IMPOSSIBLE BULLSHIT TIME TO LOOK IT UP". They kept at it and actually usually figured it out themselves, or a friend who did saved them the trouble. Gamers today give up very quickly. I don't even completely blame them for it - games are more tiresome these days most of the time. It stops being fun far, far more quickly, and once you're no long having fun, who gives a shit.
Yeah except old games did it to keep you playing because there wasn't a ton of games being released all the time so people needed to get their money's worth plus you really had no choice but to just figure it out because the internet didn't have easy to find info about everything back then or you straight up didn't even have access to it. Souls does it just because its made by legit buttholes who like to waste peoples time and know they'll just look it up anyway.
School basically was the internet before the internet when it comes to games information, and the information was almost as easy to come by. Unless you were home schooled, I guess. But if you were, you probably weren't seeing much vidya to start with.
>nintendo is responsible for every single lazy 2d platformer because they created mario!
>america is responsible for every single bad pizza (like that one brazillian pizza.web,) because they popularize it!
>Linear
Used to be linear and that was a good thing but now elden ring with it's empty open world full of copypasted padding sold bajillions so probably every subsequent souls game and souls game imitator will have some sort of bullshit open world
Ubisoft open world design is worse. There aren't that many games that try to emulate the Fromsoft formula because it's antithetical to how a lot of western companies design their games. The Asscreed and Far Cry shit completely oversaturates that market.
Tendie pedo seethe because he can't play ER on the Shitsh thread #8478237
Name one established IP that was "ruined" by soulsborne and explain why.
>depressing color palette
You can blame CoD for that.
>boring af
Your personal view is not everyone elses
>no interesting features
Pretty sure everyone copies the shit out of souls because of said features. Must have been interesting enough to get copied.
>dark edgy shitty story and theme
Not everything has to be sunshine and rainbows.
>GARBAGE combat gameplay
Opinion
>GARBAGE character animations
Opinion
>shitty graphics, shitty engine
Can't and won't elaborate.
>they have a mania for useless
Try that again in English next time.
>muh hardcore difficulty
Only the first Dark Souls game was toted as "hardcore" by From Software. Every game afterwards was simply considered as such by fans and the press. Never From Soft themselves.
Sounds like you are just bitter a franchise took off and it's not one you personally enjoy.
OP is too young to remember what the gaming landscape looked like when DS came out
I agree souls gameplay is nothing to write home about, but sekiro's gameplay is stellar.
WHEN
WHEN WILL YOU FRICKING Black folk
STOP ASSOCIATING SEKIRO WITH SOULS
THE ONLY FRICKING GLARING SIMILARITY IS THE CHECKPOINT SYSTEM
>"s-same company"
YEAH????? THEN ADD FRICKING DECARINE THE VR GAME UP THERE TOO
ACTUAL FRICKING BRAINDEAD Black folk WHO NEVER EVEN PLAYED THE FRICKING GAME
nobody cares shazamtroony, go dilate on your discord
>GARBAGE combat gameplay
Exactly this. And the realization that marketing alone sells games these days. Actual depth and quality means nothing. Its ALL marketing.
>depressing color palette
literally already wrong on the first line.
Elden Ring is truly beautiful
they're also refuges for gays who cannot play actual PvP and like to think they're "gud" because they memorized some attack patterns.
Honestly I think ds3 started the whole "fromsoft games have shitty dull coloring" God, a lot of that game's areas blend together besides Irithyl.
Besides that though ds1 alone btfos this entire list.
I want to see a souls-like with DMC combat
git gud