>game's villain is just your average nice guy

>game's villain is just your average nice guy

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

  1. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    sause?

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Domestic Kanojo.

  2. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >words words words
    the left cant meme

  3. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >words words words
    Have SEX

  4. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    transactional relationships are the most soulless shit

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      They're the most stable tho. Why bother with anyone if they can't offer anything in return? Even with friends, you wouldn't be hanging out with them if you weren't getting any fun out of being with them.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >They're the most stable tho.
        >Why bother with anyone if they can't offer anything in return?
        these sentences do not work in tandem like you think they do

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      I respect the honesty of the guy but he was intentionally written to lay it on way too thick.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      all relationships are (to a degree) transactional, it is the bitterest redpill.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        What's transactional about your relationship with off topic threads

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          He gets (You)'s and anons get to vent.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        You're not exactly wrong, but reducing relationships down to transactions in putting the cart before the horse.
        In a good relationship, you give freely because you never have to worry about not receiving.
        In a bad relationship, you stop giving when you stop receiving. Even when things are going well, the threat of losing reciprocity is always hanging over your head.
        Being like the dude in the OP pic is just asking to get dumped or cheated on. The only woman who would accept a proposal like that - "give me love and affection and start a family with me and I will provide for you" - would drop you the instant someone who can provide even more comes along. Is it not obvious that offering material comforts is only appealing to the materialistic?

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          >The only woman who would accept a proposal like that would drop you the instant someone who can provide even more comes along
          So literally every woman in existence right now?

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            No, there are women out there who have integrity and principles. You just don't attract them if all you have to offer is "I'm handsome and I have money."

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              >No, there are women out there who have integrity and principles.
              lmao i had a good laugh, thanks i needed a chuckle today

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >thanks, I needed a chuckle today
                Yeah, being lonely sucks, doesn't it?

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                not really, although today is a slow day its nice to hear something so outlandishly hilarious. keep up the routine, friend

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              >there are women out there who have integrity and principles
              ...oh my sweet summer child. women have NEVER had principles or loyalty.
              the only reason for that in ages passed, was STRICT adherence traditionalism (and the need to survive) and rules that would see them imitatively exiled from society should they dare to break a fore mentioned rules.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                It's a little premature to condescend, don't you think? I've been married for eight years to such a woman. In our first year of dating, I loaned $1200 and she paid back every cent. That's how I knew she was the real deal. Our fortunes have since changed and she's the breadwinner currently, but we both know that we'd be there for each other no matter what the roles were.
                But you're an expert on how we live in a society so do go on.

                >Even when things are going well, the threat of losing reciprocity is always hanging over your head.

                You have no confidence so you assume others can't have it either. Meteor could hit me. So what. I don't dwell on unlikely what-ifs.

                >The only woman who would accept a proposal like that - "give me love and affection and start a family with me and I will provide for you" - would drop you the instant someone who can provide even more comes along.

                This is the good argument. The cost of changing spouses should be higher in the legal system. The game feels a bit rigged against men from what I hear from friends and acquaintances who've been through divorce.

                Men benefit from no-fault divorce too, or would you be happy meeting a woman who seemed to prioritize fitness and marrying her, only to be stuck with her as she immediately gives up working out and becomes a landwhale? We no longer live in small, isolated communities where you already know basically everything there is to know about your potential mates. Unless you're a preternatural judge of character, there needs to be an escape mechanism. I agree that custody battles are typically unfair however.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Even when things are going well, the threat of losing reciprocity is always hanging over your head.

          You have no confidence so you assume others can't have it either. Meteor could hit me. So what. I don't dwell on unlikely what-ifs.

          >The only woman who would accept a proposal like that - "give me love and affection and start a family with me and I will provide for you" - would drop you the instant someone who can provide even more comes along.

          This is the good argument. The cost of changing spouses should be higher in the legal system. The game feels a bit rigged against men from what I hear from friends and acquaintances who've been through divorce.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      All straight relationships are transactional. Some couples are just in denial about it.

  5. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    kissless incels will see nothing wrong with this image, they will also falsely assume they have something to offer

  6. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Women would rather frick an alcoholic who beats them, than follow logic. If you are tall, handsome and rich, she still might prefer fricking a fat homeless guy, because something clicked in her head.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >If you are tall, handsome and rich, she still might prefer fricking a fat homeless guy, because something clicked in her head.
      Kek. This actually happened in Brazil and became the hot news on TV.
      A catholic tradwive cheated on her husband (6'2 gigachad rich gymgay ) with a hobo
      The woman's excuse was that she was having a schizo attack and thought the hobo was Jesus

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        proof that we're all gonna make it brehs

  7. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Women shouldn't have any rights. They should be treated like dogs and cats.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Then you wonder why you can't get laid

  8. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    This is pure wish fulfillment for men. Life would be so much easier.

  9. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Frick... I literally look and behave like the guy in this pic. Is this a bad thing? I thought women liked nice guys...

  10. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Kill romcomshit mangakas. Behead romcomshit mangakas. Roundhouse kick a romcomshit mangaka into the concrete.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      zased

  11. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    id cuck that guy by fricking her while he still rambles on about whatever the frick hes talknig about

  12. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Why would I keep treating you to dinner if I didn't expect something out of it
    Well, if you never made it clear that you wanted a relationship and actually expect the other party to read your mind then that's on you

    >even though you ~pretended~ to e modest you accepted m gifts if that isn't consent then what was it?
    It's rude to reject a gift, and it's even more rude to expect favors off gifts. It's your fault that you tried to buy affection with money and actually expect it to work.

    >I can't find any reason for you to hesitate
    Yes, you're being a complete creep and the last person anyone would want to spend longer than an hour across the table with.

    >I can support you, bla bla bla
    you're not worth it. Not the shit you provide, but the actual you person isn't worth it

    >I doubt you'll find anyone better qualified than me
    Even a solitary, pitiful life is better than spending the rest of it with a manipulative, spineless scumbag who has to resort to backhanded insults to play himself up.

    0/10 date. Don't text me ever again

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Don't text me ever again
      i wouldn't worry about it if i where you.
      enjoy your cats

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >get called out
        >"you can't get anyone anyway!"
        wow you nailed it

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *