>gun does less damage than a knife
>gun does less damage than a knife
>gun does less damage than a knife
This phonograph "reads" a rock’s rough surface and transforms it into beautiful ambient music pic.twitter.com/PYDzYsWWf8— Surreal Videos (@SurrealVideos) March 3, 2023
It'd depend on the caliber of the gun and the size of the knife. A pistol like you posted in 9mm generally just puts a clean 9mm hole in someone. Something like 5.56 will blow chunks out of people and nearly sever their bicep.
A good knife stab would likely do more damage to a body than a pistol caliber would. A knife slash would lack the penetration required to make a deep lethal wound in most circumstances though and should do less damage than both a stab and a pistol round.
How is 5 deadlier than 9? Isn't 5 > 9 ?
but 5 is 45 and 9 is 19
Velocity. 5.56 travels at a much higher velocity. Pistol calibers are slow which is why they have no secondary wounding effects other than punching a hole. 5.56 for example fragments when it hits a target. I'd post what 5.56 wounds look like but mods would ban me for gore. Keep in mind pic related is the most common and readily available basic 5.56 target ammo, M193. You can imagine what getting shot by this and having it explode in you would be like. Premium ammo is even deadlier.
Also you can see at low velocity it starts to perform like a pistol round. Little to no deformation to the bullet. Pistols have hollowpoints to help with this (bullet expands when it hits the target) but they don't always expand reliably and even with their expansion it generally just makes the hole slightly bigger. Their main use is the bullet may slow down and release all its energy in the body rather than travel through and potentially hit a bystander. You get slightly better wounding as well but it will never approach the wound of a rifle round at proper velocity.
>Pistol calibers are slow which is why they have no secondary wounding effects other than punching a hole
a slower bullet means no overpenetration means bigger energy dump. a fragged 5.56 will shred you, but a mushrooming .45 will be like getting hit with an explosive sledgehammer.
noguns and or trolls.
One time my pappy shot a vagrant with his Marlin 39 chambered in .22lr and that puppy bounced around inside of him a million times over leaving only a mound of flesh
>15 bullets (max)
9 * 15 = 135 DMG
5.56 x 30 = 166.8 DMG
Stop being such a noob
>The majority of patients in both groups (84.1 percent) had signs of life on delivery to the hospital. A third of patients with gunshot wounds (33.0 percent) died compared with 7.7 percent of patients with stab wounds.
Appears that in reality the deep wounds caused by bullets are a more significant factor than the supposed lethality of knives. People don't generally carry knives as large as the average penetration of 9mm in flesh.
You're such a retard. You're literally proving that knifes kill faster. If you get cut and don't bleed out in seconds then you'll live (as your research has shown). One wrong stab and you're out.
One wrong deep hit into an internal organ and you'll be dead before you reach the OR.
>deep hit into an internal organ
not really. its the arteries that kill you quick. outside of the obvious brain and heart, the fastest death from being shot in an organ would probably be if both lungs got punctured. and even then, you could still mostly breathe, it would just be really hard. as long as emts got to you relatively fast, youll live.
the liver is the most painful organ to get shot in and youll wish it killed you.
Stopping power vs penetrating power, which is not well approximated by one "damage" stat. It's a similar deal with higher vs lower caliber guns.
You're not very intelligent if you think a rifle round isn't objectively superior to a pistol round in all metrics when it comes to just straight up killing someone without concern for any other factor.
You're not very intelligent if you bark at people like a dog without trying to understand the topic.
The problem is you don't understand the topic and are trying to sound intelligent.
el retardo basado
Bulletproof vest won't save you from knife stab (and vice versa)
So a knife won't save you from a bulletproof vest?
He means stab vests (or medieval armor for example).
so if i layer a bullet proof vest within my medieval armor i would be invincible?
It would be very heavy
He's a big guy.
If I pulled off that bulletproof vest, would you die?
I would be very painful
Except for headshots.
If the bulletproof vest is motivated enough, no.
you say that but plenty of bullet resistant equipment does resist knives to a degree.
"How to out yourself as stupid in one post"
It's not realistic but it's not meant to be. It's a balancing mechanic. Up close is dangerous and hard to get in a game with even semi-realistic gunplay, as such its usually an instakill to reward the stealth/rush play. I'm just assuming the thread is bait but you can figure this out yourself pretty easy.
You know remember OnlyUseMeBlade
The gun is only 400 years old while the knife is the child of many millenia. Do you fancy the odds?
>makes a hole in you
>makes a giant fucking chasm on your body and in case of serration gruesomely turns your innards into ground beef on a way out
Guns are superior because they're ranged weapons not because of the damage they deal
Wait till you learn about hollow/soft points
That's a rifle round. Rifle rounds have nasty effects on the human body and are obviously superior than a blade. Pistol rounds however, poke neat holes in humans regardless of the caliber. Even with hollowpoints.
Let me guess, European?
Let me guess, noguns who doesn't shoot? Thinking your little ballistic gel test equals real world performance is the mark of someone who is clinically noguns.
That’s a whole lot of cope for someone who didn’t post their’s first also ballistics gel tests have been the standard for the FBI for like 50 years.
This fucking guy thinks he can get shot and just walk away from it lmao
People have done exactly that after being shot in the head
Humans have bones, meat and fat. They're not made from fucking gello
No shit dummy do you really think a bullet traveling 2000 ft./s busting through bone isn’t going to do a lot of damage?
and yet i keep hearing about people surviving a dozen knife stabs
people also survive gun wounds
Serration is for bread and wood. Against meat you're better off just pushing down.
>its another 'Gankerners wank off about weapons' thread
Cry about it
i want to talk about guns not suck off ukraine
>wants to do that but does it on the board meant for video games
Just make your own thread bro I promise it will hit bump limit
Gun shoots knives at a distance of course it does lower damage
Yes, gun likely deals less damage than a knife. Bullets do more.
>increase your gun skill
>your guns deal more damage
better gun skill means you can aim for the vitals easier
Having player character randomly miss shots even when the crosshair lines up with the target due to low skill would be frustrating so they compensate for low gun skill by lowering your damage (as if it were the average of X amount of shots where some of them missed due to poor aim)
dont mind me just massively increasing damage
>bonus holy damage
>+50% dmg to atheists
>slowmo shot of bullet cut in half by katana
that shit does less damage if you're using bulletproof vest, but yeah it will fuck you up if not.
Bullet is smaller than knife.
Unless it isn't, in that case bullet does more damage.
Found OP's dildo
>manlytears and his brother inspecting rifle cartridges
It's just gameplay you retarded fucking smark.
Do you people also complain about mechs and make threads about how rats dropping full armor isn't realistic
unironic shitposting is still shitposting. No (you).
Of course the knife does more damage. It's way bigger.
>itt: a bunch of noguns morons
>has all the guns in the world
>still kneels before morons and his gnomish overlords
morons have more guns
You have a mental illness.
i blame the european and european adjacents like canadians and aussies
Knife wounds tend to be worse
A knife can be more messy than a 9mm, my brother is ED surgeon and he always says he prefers taking guys with gun shots than stabs because the damage is much smaller and it's way easier to deal with
sword with gun 100%. Neither can move but sword with gun can still shoot.
can the gun with a sword shoot?
It's a gun with a sword not bullets dumbass
>*DOES TWICE AS MUCH DAMAGE AS A RIFLE*
>shoots projectile 50x larger
>only does 2x damage
bowbucks, are we getting mogged?
never understood the dude shooting an arrow into the ground at the end. Is it a Korean thing?
No time for taunts the car thing is driving him home but still enough time for a last arrow
this would go well with M&B sounds
Sniper has a lot of murmuring voice lines. That would also go well with it
I've seen this a hundred times and still don't know what it's from.
Why don't they just make a gun that shoot knives?
>Why don't they just make a blaster than shoots lightsabers
I bet you feel stupid now
Considering Lightsabers are more powerful why not? Only reason I can think of is Jedi can just throw their Lightsaber and force pull it back so they don't need the blaster.
A literal laser is the most stupid and destructive idea.
a single wrongbullet and you've punched a hole straight through the city.
Probably why they didn't try, althoguh space laser guns might be just that.
A good disruption "laser" will massacre a jedi, like in jedi academy. Assuming he doesn't predict the strike, but not all force users have that speed.
>kick does more damage than a gun
Yes, multiplayer shooters have guns not act realistically because dying in one hit isn't fun. Shotguns also are incredibly nerfed because while they are devastating in close range being 20 feet away from one doesn't make them suddenly stop being dangerous.
Just use a .50 caliber you fucking pansies. You don't need functioning wrists anyway.