here is the switch port u wanted bro

here is the switch port u wanted bro

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    the shore hairline on the switch looks better
    that nigga clean

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    they look the same

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    yay!
    now post Gothic

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    soulless vs soul

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Indeed. Left is muh movie reality, right looks like a fantasy game.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      me: muscular guy
      you: scrawny, unkempt, crying maybe

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >less obnoxious BROWN'N'BLOOM
    >kino fog
    Nice. Glad I waited for the definitive version.

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Looks the same. People bought new hardware for this?

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I would have expected something that pushed the switches limits a bit better given how long it took them to make it, still at least you can actually tell there's meant to be a building on the lake there on the switch version

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It looks the same, bro.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Kek even the PS5 has atrocious tiling textures on the brick walls, fucking pathetic.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      imagine having pubes that long and thick

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      soulless/soul

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    SOUL

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The sad thing is, you can actually see buildings more clearly on the right (worse) pic, but not on the left because
    >''fog''
    or whatever that is.

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I know Nint*ddlers will accept anything Nintendo shits out but do you guys think Nintendo is ever embarrassed over how shitty the hardware of their consoles are?
    Like holy fuck is a current gen Nintendo console too big of an ask?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The switch is currently one of nintendo's top three sold hardware. They will only care about hardware power again when it's PROFITABLE to do so.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It's profitable to do so, it's just that history has shown them no one gives a fuck about their non-handhelds.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >able to sell slop means it's good

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      here's nintendo being embarrassed by their shitty hardware

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >shore hairline

  13. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Sad port but what's even sadder is buying/playing this piece of shit AAA in the first place.

  14. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Switch version has a more classic feel to it which some people actually prefer. Zoomers won't understand

  15. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    honestly seeing how they made some areas not openworld and made them into separate loading areas was interesting. like hogsmeade for example.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Clever I guess

  16. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    lmao i'm honestly impressed they got it to run on that hardware. so much upscaling/fsr you're pretty much just looking at jagged edges 24/7 and artifact glitches 24/7

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You're impressed that they made a visually great game look like a PS2 era game?

  17. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    That's embarrassing. Why even bother at that point?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Because publishers know that Nintendo fans are like Apple fans, in that they'll buy any old bullshit largely out of brand loyalty.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Because there has been a fostered community of "Switch Physical Only Gamers"™ that is upsetting large, who is literally just buying every single fucking switch game released. The Switch audience is probably blowing more money than any entertainment audience in the world rn.

  18. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >left
    Movie
    >right
    Video game

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >left
      >movie
      >even though right only plays at 24fps

  19. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Wow! An Xbox 360 version?? I can't believe they're still releasing games for a console from 2005! You know, that just goes to show ya, developers can do really amazing stuff when they're tasked with making... wait a second. That... that's the Switch version. That's a console from 2017, not 2005. So that means... oh no. oh no NO NONONONN NOn NOOOOOOOOooooooooo HOW EMBARRASSING!!!

  20. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >60$

  21. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    if the gameplays all there its fine, graphics are such a meme these days

  22. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    its jaggy
    but honestly its pretty ok for running on the switch https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iXahPAYjbzw
    I think the fundamental problem of it being an OK game remains though

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Its ok for a switch
      It copes

  23. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    WTF NINTENDO SISTERSI THOUGHT NINTENDO WAS AT 80% AS GOOD AS PS5 NOT 20% OF THE PS5!

    At least it's better than PS4? r-right?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Its like ps3.5, doesnt even come close to ps4

  24. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    7 year old handheld isn't as powerful as a PS5? I'm literally going to kill myself nooooooooooo

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The game is also on ps4 (came out in 2013) no excuses now

  25. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Wow xbox 360 ports are still a thing?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *