48 thoughts on “hopefully Nintendo’s next console has comparable hardware to their competitors, since it appare…”

  1. I can understand most of them as it would need heavy porting, but KH3 is UE4 and a new version at that. 90% of the work is done with a single change in settings.

    Reply
  2. they could have effortlessly ported kh1 and 2 and then make a cloud version of 3. they made them all cloud so that when the lifecycle of the switch ends and they shut the servers down you will be forced to buy it again on whatever the fuck is out by then, the switch 3 or the wii u 2 or the nintendo 65, hell if i know

    Reply
    • you guys are just plain wrong, stay mad i guess
      but you should direct that outrage at Nintendo if you had any forethought
      you expect everyone to hack their games to bit and compromise their artistic visions just to barely squeeze fucked up ports onto you weak little tablet
      god damn you guys are so fucking dumb

      Reply
      • ps4 ports like the witcher 3 had indeed to be cut down
        ps2 and ps3 ports like ffx and bioshock infinite run just fine on the switch without any compromise
        here’s your (you) of the day

        Reply
  3. Everybody except me in this thread have no idea that final fantasy X, X-2 and final fantasy 12 are on switch and those games originated as PS2 exclusives.

    Reply
  4. Nintendonlies are unreal. If they add 2B there will also be endless bitching about NieR Automata not being on Switch when you can literally play it one every other console/platform.

    Reply
  5. I chalk it up to Squeenix cashgrab laziness. The Switch could run the first two games just fine, only 3 should be cloud.
    That being said, there really needed to at least be an upgraded Switch by now. Metroid Dread cruised along keeping 60 FPS the majority of the game but then after you get the Screw Attack, the game can’t keep up with the speed you’re moving around, drops to sub-30 at least for some time.
    Link’s Awakening and Dread were intended as 60 FPS games. If a game can’t keep its intended framerate, then it’s time for a hardware upgrade.

    Reply
  6. Yeah, that’s bullshit.

    If the Switch can run the Xenoblade games, the Bayonetta games and the new Metroid it can certainly run their shitty PS3 ports of these ugly ass games.

    Square is just being fucking lazy.

    Reply
  7. There’s no excuse for 1.5+2.5 being a cloud game. It’s literally a PS3 port of some PS2 games. Sure, there’s a reason: they’re already making cloud versions of 3 and 2.8 so putting the rest on the cloud required no extra effort on their part. But that’s not an excuse.

    Reply
  8. >hopefully Nintendo’s next console has comparable hardware to their competitors
    That’s like hoping for the next generation of pigs to have wings

    Reply
  9. The entire HD KH compilation is like 200+ GB on consoles. Forget about physical copies since Nintendo at best can only make 64gb cartridges. Forget about digital as most people don’t have a 512gb SD card sitting in their Switch. Cloud is the only solution. It’s like DQX or PSO2 on Switch where they could have easily ported it but the games are fucking huge to install.

    Reply
  10. If Nintendo’s next-gen hardware isn’t at least as powerful as Steam Deck and doesn’t jump from ARM to X86 it can say goodbye to third-party support.

    Reply
  11. Isn’t this more on Square for not wanting to take the time to properly port it? Like how WiiU had almost no 3rd party games because porting to it was a massive pain

    Reply

Add to the conversation