Gun is the Red Dead Redemption of its generation, and it's also almost shockingly unpozzed unlike Rockstar shit >natives are savages >slaves are idiots >women are whores
>more spaghetti
Rockstar RDR is closer to the genre. Revolver RDR is closer to those cartoony western movies from the 1910s despite the references to spaghetti westerns.
spaghetti westerns outside the dollar trilogy are more cartoony than American made classic westerns. Redemption 1 and 2 are more like the post 70's Eastwood westerns that had spaghetti influences combined with a more serious tone.
It's amazing, great arcade gameplay with some really nice shootouts. Gun is the better game but both are must play on the XBOX.
Akiman of Capcom worked on the game early on.
>backported
Red Dead Revolver is the first game in the series, and was released before gen vii existed you retarded homosexual non-game player. If you actually played games instead of blogging and dilating you would know.
>invent shit in your head >post it
that was never the case. Capcom were never going to finish it and i dont know what kind of "collab" you think could possibly have been set up that late in development. >Sony should just buy Nintendo
thats the type of retardo you sound like
No, it's a storyline game. It's a pretty good western and you get deep lore, but nothing significant in the series.
Terrible. Feels more like Dino Crsis 2 in the wild west but even less depth
>Feels more like Dino Crsis 2 in the wild west
It was a capcom game, but they sold it to rockslop to publish gta in japon
Gun is the Red Dead Redemption of its generation, and it's also almost shockingly unpozzed unlike Rockstar shit
>natives are savages
>slaves are idiots
>women are whores
Interesting.
It's a PS2 game you stupid zoomer.
>game released in 2010 is retro
sure thing nagger
wut
wrong RDR friendo
>LARPing brainlets outing themselves
You love to see it.
it's not live action if it's happening in text on a slow-paced message board that does not advance in real time
it's just RPing
Will calling them posers satisfy your pedantry?
amazing
No, it's not. It's a mission-based game, there's no open world or anything. If you want a GTA in the Wild West, look for GUN.
I like it. It's a lot goofier and more spaghetti western than Redemption. I remember being very surprised to learn they were making a sequel to this.
>more spaghetti
Rockstar RDR is closer to the genre. Revolver RDR is closer to those cartoony western movies from the 1910s despite the references to spaghetti westerns.
spaghetti westerns outside the dollar trilogy are more cartoony than American made classic westerns. Redemption 1 and 2 are more like the post 70's Eastwood westerns that had spaghetti influences combined with a more serious tone.
It is just GTA but in the wild west.
It's not like GTA at all, it's close to Wild Guns in 3D with a more down to earth story.
It's amazing, great arcade gameplay with some really nice shootouts. Gun is the better game but both are must play on the XBOX.
Akiman of Capcom worked on the game early on.
it's garbage just like every R* game that's not a GTA, the only exception is Bully
>the only exception is Bully
That has the worst gameplay of every Rockstar game
>inb4 muh soulful licensed game tier music!
>Bully
>worst gameplay
it BTFO Manhunt and The Warriors, hell it's also better than GTA 3 and Reddit City
The Xbox version runs much better if you can play that instead. Also no, the GTA thing is not in Revolver, just level selection.
Call of Juarez is a better western
Not retro and the only reason you made this thread is because you thought this:
>I found a 7th gen game that got backported to PS2! I'll shit up /vr/ with this!
You probably think you're the only one who thought of this too
>backported
Red Dead Revolver is the first game in the series, and was released before gen vii existed you retarded homosexual non-game player. If you actually played games instead of blogging and dilating you would know.
do zoomers really?
this has got to be bait right? I mean after the first guy...
How much of Capcom’s original development exists within Rockstar’s release?
I dont think Rockstar even touched it because it still very much feels like a Capcom published game.
It's an arcade game that's not a Rockstar game it's like Max Payne
Capcom had a million dollar idea of a collab with Rockstar and they just let them go off with it.
Fucking lol
>invent shit in your head
>post it
that was never the case. Capcom were never going to finish it and i dont know what kind of "collab" you think could possibly have been set up that late in development.
>Sony should just buy Nintendo
thats the type of retardo you sound like
Here's your Mega Man Legends 3 brah