I hate to say it, but they really made it hard to refuse this man's offer.

I hate to say it, but they really made it hard to refuse this man's offer. The voice actor imo did a good job with him.

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    He should have. Tencent paid him handsomely.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      How can you show up in every single BG3 thread so fucking fast? I'm starting to think you might be the guy on a paycheck here.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        He just combs through the catalogue to look for BG3 threads to start spamming in. He does it in Starfield threads as well.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Yeah but why? What's the motive? Is he actually schizophrenic or is someone paying him?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            He's clearly a jobless mentally ill person living off neetbux, seeing how he spams his images literally every single day within the same time frame.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >within the same time frame
              Meaning 24/7.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >anyone who posts the same picture must be the same person

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                If you frequented bg3 threads at all these past couple months, you can easily tell that yes, it is indeed the same person posting these.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Embarrassing.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                In this case, yes. It is a single, crushingly lonely anon.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            It's just one anon taking BG3's success especially hard because his favorite Youtubers told him it was going to 'go woke, go broke'. He has since retreated into his mental safe space and created fantastical scenarios to cope with it.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            He's 100% a schizo. Everyone in these threads knows about him by this point because he's been on an obsessed crusade for months at this point.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            He's an xbox fanboy.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      At this point, this is a full time job. I seriously hope someone is paying you.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      How's it feel knowing you are powerless to impact the game's success, no matter what you do? Must be killing you inside 🙂

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You shills can't make a thread without people being informed. He won.
        King. I kneel

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >He
          You're still at it? lol

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Samefagging now. Even more pathetic.

            >LARPing a defender

            LMAO

            >17 IPs
            >but somehow thinking you can count the uniques
            Something you want to tell the mods?

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Gankerx lets you track unique IPs

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                not on board without IDs enabled. If you know count the exact posters in a thread and you know the total posts from uniques you don't know, the rest are advertising shills. and that's a lot of shills.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                it can though
                there were only 14 IPs before this post

                You shills can't make a thread without people being informed. He won.
                King. I kneel

                was made which itself wasn't made with a unique IP meaning it could reasonably have been the same guy.
                if we cut out the IPs of me and those 3 posts you've quoted we arrive at 10 IPs total, cut a few guys reacting with dismay to your shit and we can cut it down further by about 4
                so we have 1/6th of a chance that you're the same guy, decent odds considering that you're the only guy defending him in the thread AND without a unique IP

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >it could reasonably have been
                there's actually no basis for this unless you assume the IPs before that post weren't people posting after, which you can't track unless you know the posters of those IPs: Hence, you and your compatriots are advertising against the rules

                but feel free to leave more evidence for the mods

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Anon every post with a new IP gets it's number shown in brackets next to the anonymous.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Wouldn't it be more likely for someone engaged in the discourse to respond rather than some literal who random who came to the thread and instead of engaging with the OP decided to jump in as someones character witness?
                As in, it's not actually 1/6th because it's literally not random or equal chance, you're just too dumb to have the variables?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Wouldn't it be more likely for someone engaged in the discourse
                yea like the guy who posted this

                He should have. Tencent paid him handsomely.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >not on board without IDs enabled
                Wrong, retard.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Counting the number of unique IPs as posted does not tell you which IPs are tied to what posts after. I know this takes an IQ above 80 to understand.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You can take a pretty good guess based on it.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >a pretty good guess
                getting farther away from "i know exactly who you are"

                >it could reasonably have been
                there's actually no basis for this unless you assume the IPs before that post weren't people posting after, which you can't track unless you know the posters of those IPs: Hence, you and your compatriots are advertising against the rules

                but feel free to leave more evidence for the mods

                >anyone who posts the same picture must be the same person

                The more they complain, the more obvious it is they're actual paid shills

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                No, you can be absolutely certain, you don't have to make a guess. He always reacts the same way when people point this out. He doesn't even try, yet he really wants you to think his posts all belong to other people.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              I don't need you to cover for me, bro.
              It's all me.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              You post the same shit-ass compressed screenshot every time you get accused of samefagging to """prove""" you're not. Do you really think anybody falls for this? https://arch.b4k.co/v/thread/650328060/#650336769 At least change the theme, jesus fucking christ.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >he doesn't know about randomized filenames
                sorry nostradamus

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Did you reply to the wrong post? Are your hands shaking?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Samefagging now. Even more pathetic.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >LARPing a defender

          LMAO

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      China and Russia will win

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    except that his deal is pants on head retarded and you have 0 reason to take it

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Especially given how you don't even have to take it right now and it turns out it's piss easy to break into his house, like it's not even remotely hidden at all
      What the fuck

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      He has basically no role in the story compared to what he was hyped up to be in EA. Doesn't get rid of your tadpole, doesn't do anything except wait for to come and murder his ass, like every other antagonist. Not to mention that combat theme, awful.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Not to mention that combat theme, awful.
        ok that's over the line

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    what's his end game?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Just wasting time just like artifact bot in every valve thread

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >I hate to say it, but they really made it hard to refuse this man's offer
    Do I still get to rob his house if I take his deal? Because then taking his deal denies you the best dungeon in the game.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You can, just steal the whole ritual set and visit the house yourself

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Okay but Valve raped and murdered the Artifact fanbase in a dumpster behind an Arby's in 1989.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Did they really?

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Literally paid to shill against Larian on Ganker lmao

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    That schizo is an Xbox fanboy who is big mad that BG3 stole Shartfield's thunder.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      BG3 is coming to Xbox like next month

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        So? BG3 isn't Xbox console exclusive like Starfield is, Xbots needed a win badly and Bethesda failed to deliver.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I simply can't imagine being so invested in which megacorporation's game console does better than the other one

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Then your problem should be with the spammer who constantly obsesses over BG3, not the anons pointing out why the schizo is behaving like a schizo.

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Anyone else here thought that the guy was voiced by the Wesker voice actor?

    ?t=2

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    After how he talks about Mol you didn't already have the idea to kill him?

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >happiest ending is 'al ackbar' gale
    >no one gets turned into a Mindflayer
    >Orpheus and Lae'zel can free their people
    >crowd and brain is incinerated so can't fall into wrong hands
    >Gale can be with Mystra
    The best outcome ending IMHO.

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It's canon for him to end up with the crown. He will be the bg4 antagonist in 7 years

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Rule number one in fantasy: Never make a deal with a devil.

    That's his whole point. He isn't a solution. He isn't really helping you. He just tries to get your soul and the crown.

    It's actually insane how good of a job Larian did, because even I accepted the deal in act 3. The only reason I save scummed and chose to actually not take the deal, was because I realized I will go to the house of hope no matter my decision.

    That's why he is so great. He is able to make you ignore the rule to never accept a deal of a devil. The most insane part is that he is never forcing you to accept it. He just used his words and that's it, while you can always just leave.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Sure, I don't disagree with any of that.
      However, given that Faerun has a well-established and known system of belief with existing gods, afterlives, and the very real, personally witnessed hell I'd be consigning myself to: Yeah I'm good if no better option presents itself I'll be self-immolating pal.
      Hell I'd probably have necked myself the first time I have a dream with a suHispaniciously helpful dream friend who says the eyebug is my friend. I know what indoctrination looks like and I've seen Andromeda I'm killing this series here and now see you fuckers in the wall of unbelievers fuck I MADE A MISTAKE NO PLEASE AAAAAAAAAAAA

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *