Botw is like half a game. Totk is good. I admit that, but it doesn't change enough to really be a standout new game. It would be nice to have a long pokemon game in the legends style or just side quests in the mainline games that give you something to do. Zelda games do give you that, but i don't think it is enough to push it over all the games pokemon puts out.
>Totk is good. I admit that, but it doesn't change enough to really be a standout new game
It quite literally changes the entire world and adds a whole 2nd map as well as my islands
Yes I have.
If you did then youd be able to acknowledge how different they actually are
>The depths is just as bland as DPP's underground
Did you even explore the depths to any degree? Did you find any of the abandoned mines or settlements or NPCs down there even? You never played the game. DPPs underground was just a giant maze, its nowhere near comparable.
>edited map
Thats really funny, because thats EXACTLY what Pokemon has been since the beginning. Yellow is just Red/Blue with an edited map, Crystal is just Gold/silver with an edited map, Emerald is just Ruby/Sapphire with an edited map. But oh wait, TotK ISN'T just an edited map, because it actually adds an entire 2 worlds, Pokemon fans would be pissing and shitting themselves in excitement if GF did something like that. But they never will, and you will always be a disingenuous retard.
Personal opinions don't work here anon. Dark souls 3 is the best dark souls by far, and "made by different teams" doesn't hold up as an excuse when game freak itself has team A and team B. And we're not even counting dlcs here. Pokemon is the biggest goyslop I've ever seen in my entire life, and my closest friend is a garden gnome so I'm used to seeing garden gnome stuff. >elden ring started development after the end of ds3's main game and before sekiro, it also took 6 years
Except in the meantime they were also developing sekiro and ds3 dlcs. You said it yourself
>Dark souls 3 is the best dark souls by far
it has even less creative merit than dark souls 2. like the game's own metanarrative is about how miyazaki didnt want to make another game for this series, so the entire game is torn between superficial ds1 fanservice and the world being told that nostalgia is bad and you should move onto something else
all of these games are great but the dark souls sequels are substantially worse than the rest of the series
if you like the combat and levels or whatever then it's just a dumbed-down version of elden ring and inferior to both bloodborne and sekiro
>nu Pokemon makes more games, all shit >nu Zelda makes less games, all shit
At least they make new maps for Pokemon.
People have yet to realize that its not just GF, but Nintendo as a whole that is filled with incomptent, greedy and lazy people.
love all the comments shitting on botw and totk >both games are soulless, empty fields to run around
then why are they the most popular games to emulate on pc? >b-because it will make it look better!
yeah, but you've got 4K "soulless, empty fields" then after that >I-I'll add texture mods!
and how will that help? >f-fuck you gay!
>then why are they the most popular games to emulate on pc?
because they are the least worthwhile games to spend money to play on their native platform
my point was that people complained about botw & totk's worlds being so empty and lifeless, yet people are compelled to emulate it on pc where it's just upscaled "empty and lifeless" worlds.
I personally enjoy ToTK but it still doesn't feel like it should have taken that long. It really just feels like playing BOTW again with better tools and a few methods of exploring things vertically.
Legends and Scarlet/Violet felt like they changed a lot more for their series. Even if GF never retains what they learn.
>Legends and Scarlet/Violet felt like they changed a lot more for their series. Even if GF never retains what they learn.
What did Scarlet/Violet change for its series?
Visual style revamped (not for the better sadly). ToTK is like 80% resused assets and robots with the same design philosophy as the ones in the last game.
But SV also reuses a fuckload of assets. Even background ones. I noticed alot of tropes from previous games, including a fucking wheelbarrow that GF has reused since fucking SM.
>What did Scarlet/Violet change for its series?
it removed building interiors and it's the first game in the series where you can easily glitch the camera inside the walls/terrain
>6 years for an edited map
I’d rather take the 6 games
you never played either game
Yes I have.
Botw is like half a game. Totk is good. I admit that, but it doesn't change enough to really be a standout new game. It would be nice to have a long pokemon game in the legends style or just side quests in the mainline games that give you something to do. Zelda games do give you that, but i don't think it is enough to push it over all the games pokemon puts out.
gameplay changes a lot
>Totk is good. I admit that, but it doesn't change enough to really be a standout new game
It quite literally changes the entire world and adds a whole 2nd map as well as my islands
If you did then youd be able to acknowledge how different they actually are
The depths is just as bland as DPP's underground
I played the leak and totk is the definition of $70 DLC. Literally pokemon tiers of gnomish
>The depths is just as bland as DPP's underground
Did you even explore the depths to any degree? Did you find any of the abandoned mines or settlements or NPCs down there even? You never played the game. DPPs underground was just a giant maze, its nowhere near comparable.
>The depths is just as bland as DPP's underground
I don't believe that you've played either game.
>edited map
Thats really funny, because thats EXACTLY what Pokemon has been since the beginning. Yellow is just Red/Blue with an edited map, Crystal is just Gold/silver with an edited map, Emerald is just Ruby/Sapphire with an edited map. But oh wait, TotK ISN'T just an edited map, because it actually adds an entire 2 worlds, Pokemon fans would be pissing and shitting themselves in excitement if GF did something like that. But they never will, and you will always be a disingenuous retard.
Bloodborne is 2015
Dark souls 3 is 2016
Sekiro came out in 2019
Elden ring was last year
Cringe
ds3 and sekiro were by a different team and ds3 is also the worst miyazaki game
elden ring started development after the end of ds3's main game and before sekiro, it also took 6 years
Personal opinions don't work here anon. Dark souls 3 is the best dark souls by far, and "made by different teams" doesn't hold up as an excuse when game freak itself has team A and team B. And we're not even counting dlcs here. Pokemon is the biggest goyslop I've ever seen in my entire life, and my closest friend is a garden gnome so I'm used to seeing garden gnome stuff.
>elden ring started development after the end of ds3's main game and before sekiro, it also took 6 years
Except in the meantime they were also developing sekiro and ds3 dlcs. You said it yourself
>Dark souls 3 is the best dark souls by far
it has even less creative merit than dark souls 2. like the game's own metanarrative is about how miyazaki didnt want to make another game for this series, so the entire game is torn between superficial ds1 fanservice and the world being told that nostalgia is bad and you should move onto something else
all of these games are great but the dark souls sequels are substantially worse than the rest of the series
if you like the combat and levels or whatever then it's just a dumbed-down version of elden ring and inferior to both bloodborne and sekiro
>and that makes it bad because... it does ok???
It overhauled the game massively, it's like a smaller version of elden ring. You're delusional
Whoever wrote that is correct, but that image is also dishonest, since it includes DLC on the Pokemon side even though BotW also got DLC.
That's what it says to botw's right, "Expansion Pass".
Screenshot of a tweet, not even the actual image, which also literally already has a thread
Twitter screens screenshot thread/10
and more games to complain, and shitpost on Ganker
>nu Pokemon makes more games, all shit
>nu Zelda makes less games, all shit
At least they make new maps for Pokemon.
People have yet to realize that its not just GF, but Nintendo as a whole that is filled with incomptent, greedy and lazy people.
Metroid Prime Remastered is just so much better
Zeldas new game is just a half baked gmod clone. Cant even spawn npcs or sweps.
love all the comments shitting on botw and totk
>both games are soulless, empty fields to run around
then why are they the most popular games to emulate on pc?
>b-because it will make it look better!
yeah, but you've got 4K "soulless, empty fields" then after that
>I-I'll add texture mods!
and how will that help?
>f-fuck you gay!
>then why are they the most popular games to emulate on pc?
because they are the least worthwhile games to spend money to play on their native platform
my point was that people complained about botw & totk's worlds being so empty and lifeless, yet people are compelled to emulate it on pc where it's just upscaled "empty and lifeless" worlds.
people are much less critical of games they didn't have to pay for
>people are much less critical of games they didn't have to pay for
are you retarded?
people still complain about content they never pay for.
in this world, free isn't good enough anymore
No my complaint is the worlds being the same, with additions, not empty. It's the same reason I got bored with White 2 before beating it.
I shit on sword and shield a lot but it at least had a new map.
I personally enjoy ToTK but it still doesn't feel like it should have taken that long. It really just feels like playing BOTW again with better tools and a few methods of exploring things vertically.
Legends and Scarlet/Violet felt like they changed a lot more for their series. Even if GF never retains what they learn.
>Legends and Scarlet/Violet felt like they changed a lot more for their series. Even if GF never retains what they learn.
What did Scarlet/Violet change for its series?
Visual style revamped (not for the better sadly). ToTK is like 80% resused assets and robots with the same design philosophy as the ones in the last game.
But SV also reuses a fuckload of assets. Even background ones. I noticed alot of tropes from previous games, including a fucking wheelbarrow that GF has reused since fucking SM.
SV doesn't reuse the whole overworld like TotK does
>What did Scarlet/Violet change for its series?
it removed building interiors and it's the first game in the series where you can easily glitch the camera inside the walls/terrain
The amount of dick-sucking BoTW gets on this board could almost be compared to Joe and Masuda.
same thing about defending the pokemon anime series past gen 6
the difference is that one of these games is annual shovelware that doesn't even run on its only console
*slurp slurp*
I actually enjoyed Arceus though so it kinda fucks up the comparison.
6 years
Nintendo's seal of quality approval
This game is being powered by Zeldafans, scared Elden ring was going to take their Goty
How come my (totally legit btw) emulator copy doesn't have funny glitches like that? It's unfair...
>elden ring
ah yes the meme game
copium is real
Let's be real here. The delayed Zelda cuz they didn't want to compete with Elden Ring.
When will Ganker realise that this is exact sentiment is the reason for the quality issues in the franchise
Pokefags attempting to criticize literally any other game in existence would be like if Adam Sandler started reviewing movies
He can act well when he tries in the occasional serious movie, and even in comedies like Click he did some touching scenes.
both Zelda and nuPokemon are garbage