Imagine if gamefreak ever did this. I would gladly play thr next pokemon game then.

Imagine if gamefreak ever did this. I would gladly play thr next pokemon game then. Hell i would even come here without the intention of shitting up the catalog

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

  1. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    They would have to charge more to make up for the extra dev time. What they should really do is quit making every game so bloated with content nobody even cares about like contests and one off useless shitmons needlessly expanding the dex.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >They would have to charge more to make up for the extra dev time.
      moron detected.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        NTA, but where's the merch coming from? The cards? What's the telly show going to do?
        They shaped the fricking franchise to best sell itself to children, to the point it's ingrained as THE kiddy RPG experience and still we get morons like you, who think it they just *stop* wanting to earn 5 billion every three years, you could get your ebin adult pogermans game, to pretend you're not pushing thirty and actually getting emotionally displaced irl from the fact a kid's series is a kid's series.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          They'd do what they did last time and drip feed next gen mon via those things you just mentioned. When DP took 4 years to come out instead of the usual 3 we started getting Gen 4 Mon invading a ton of Gen 3 media. From the Mime Jr, Bonsly and Weavile cameos in Movie 8/Buizel, Chatot and Mantyke cameos in Movie 9 to Munchlax appearances in a ton of spinoffs (Dash, Gale of Darkness, PMD), Bonsly usable in Gale of Darknessn in a very limited fashion, there were probably one or two TCG cards made during that period and the fact that there's only so many of them and there's limited info would incentivise hunting them down in the games or merch they're in. They wouldn't actually lose out all that much, hell, play it right and they could actually drive hype and anticipation way the frick up. I remember doggedly watching the Pokemon.com site for updates back when I was a kid for more info on the Gen 4 Mon who's English names hadn't even been revealed yet, it was peak hype season.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >pokemon
      >bloated

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      At least work on your bait man, this isn't even (You) worth.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >so bloated with content nobody even cares about like contests and one off useless shitmons needlessly expanding the dex
      But jackass, the new games already do that. They cut content so that it has as little as possible. You should be celebrating SV for having buttfrick nothing to do in them.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      This anon only plays pokemon and has no notion of standards whatsoever.
      You already PAID for quality control in your 60 bucks donation to GF moron, it's just that the quality control was never delivered.

  2. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why would gamefreak care about their game being a buggy mess people will buy it regardless

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      So it sells 50 millions like Mario kart instead of 25?

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        that's why they make 2 versions every gen

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Why do that when you can print out shit every year for 25m each vs. spending several years on 50m?

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Because you wanna make good things?

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      The exact same would have been true for TOTK. It wouldn’t have sold hardly any less if it didn’t have the extra polish. They did it because they’re artists who care about quality.

      They need to stop sticking with each gen lasting 3 years, it's so ridiculous that SV were probably made in the same amount of time as say BW. The games keep getting bigge trying for open world, yet still staying in the same time frame as when the games were still 2D.

      >They need to stop sticking with each gen lasting 3 years
      This. Generations should be 4 years minimum, preferably 5.

      I do not care about people's opinions. The facts are that these two new Zelda games are so far removed from old Zelda games, that they have nothing in common with them. The gameplay, the atmosphere, all of it, is so different, that they aren't even Zelda games anymore, they're just generic open world garbage where people see what whacky stuff they can do with the engine. May as well be Goat Simulator.

      The inspiration and style of adventure in BOTW/TOTK is more similar to the original NES game (large open world, discover your own path, entirely nonlinear, trial and error, etc.) than anything that came later.

  3. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Imagine if they made a real Zelda game again instead of this open world Minecraft garbage.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      yeah personally I would line up to frickin pay 70$ for "I can't believe it's not Ocarina of Time!" part 5
      fricking moron

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        A Zelda game only comes out once every six years, they never had a chance to get stale. And they were unique compared these games that play the same as every other open world game.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          >And they were unique
          stopped reading here lmao

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            kys, zoomer

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              you're calling me the zoomer yet you're the one who can't remember how people back in 2012 or so were posting everywhere about how Skyward Sword was just another recycled OoT clone and that Zelda was getting stale

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                I do not care about people's opinions. The facts are that these two new Zelda games are so far removed from old Zelda games, that they have nothing in common with them. The gameplay, the atmosphere, all of it, is so different, that they aren't even Zelda games anymore, they're just generic open world garbage where people see what whacky stuff they can do with the engine. May as well be Goat Simulator.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >these two new Zelda games are so far removed from old Zelda games
                way to out yourself as a moron, BoTW was literally conceived as a return to the original Zelda, and the proof-of-concept they developed to pitch the idea was literally done in Zelda 1 graphics

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                You're delusional, it was inspired by Skyrim and Minecraft.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                (You)
                try harder

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                The only people who pretend BOTW is a return to form are the people who never played the old games to begin with. BOTW is science fiction post apocalyptic open world garbage, where you run around and collect resources, the dungeons don't matter, there is no story, it's just a sandbox.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                one of the only smart posts in the entire thread

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                BotW doesn’t feel like Zelda 1, it feels like Shitrim

                You homosexuals have never touched an Elder Scrolls game in your lives. BotW feels nothing like Skyrim. The only thing they have in common is the open world.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >You homosexuals have never touched an Elder Scrolls game in your lives
                your mistake was expecting /vp/ to have played anything other than pokemon

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                It shows, they just come up with random open world games to shit on because they are popular, because open world le bad and just a fad. Nevermind the fact bethesda has been designing openworld games since the 90s

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                well yeah, I played Skyrim once and then never touched the series again because it was garbage

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Nah, Skyrim's a good game. And can't take you seriously if you think it is anything like BotW.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                I remember playing Zelda and it telling me where all the dungeons were
                I also remember my sword breaking after killing an enemy and having to go find a new one

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                It only tells you 4.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                BotW doesn’t feel like Zelda 1, it feels like Shitrim

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >if you conceive something as something then that automatically makes it that thing
                damn I guess they just have to conceive a game as being good and then it will automatically be good

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                I wonder how fun a 2d botw would be.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                I thought this too until I played the latest one. I literally got a wind power, used said wind power to get to the wind temple, flew around the wind temple using the funny wind power to activate a bunch of things that required the wind power. At the end there was a boss that utilized the wind power mechanics to defeat, and I got a heart container and learned Zelda was the descendant of the Time Sage or some shit.
                That was the most Zelda fricking experience I've had in 20 years.
                You literally have not played the game if you still think that.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Excuse me, it was a recycled OoT clone with WAGGLE. Completely different!

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        i unironically would

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      but they did LA's remake, they can make other older Zeldas again

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      BASED

      >Imagine if they made a real Zelda game again instead of this open world Minecraft garbage.

      soi

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >I’m gonna be a contradictory homosexual because I think it’s cool and I’ll get internet points for it

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      They did, it was called Skyward Sword and nobody liked it

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        It’s what happened when you make OoT for the third time but still refuse to improve the formula and the story is also worse
        Pokemon changed more than Zelda over the years

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          Skyward was the first time they considered story as part of initial development stages, as they had the plan for the gameplay already baked in due to Wiimote/Nunchuck. That the last two games have tied back to it proves they felt it was worth reiterating too.

  4. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    They need to stop sticking with each gen lasting 3 years, it's so ridiculous that SV were probably made in the same amount of time as say BW. The games keep getting bigge trying for open world, yet still staying in the same time frame as when the games were still 2D.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      BW took 4 years.

      We can see that
      >RG: 1990-1995 (5 years)
      >GS: 1995-1999 (4 years)
      >RS: 1999-2002 (3 years)
      >DP: 2002-2006 (4 years)
      >BW: 2006-2010 (4 years)
      >XY: 2010-2013 (3 years)
      >SM: 2013-2016 (3 years)
      >SwSh: 2016-2019 (3 years)
      >SV: 2019-2022 (3 years)

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        BW took 3 years anon. Nintendo power published an interview with Masuda for its launch where he stated it started about 4 years before its US launch. 2011 - 4 = 2007.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Game Freak took from after DP's launch to about mid-2007 off as most their staff were showing signs of burnout and they wanted to hire more staff, to facilitate shitting out remakes as well as concentrating on producing new Gens. Up to Platinum, the main development team had to make new gens, remakes and rehashes on their todd.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      3 year dev time would probably be ok if they didn't juggle a bunch of projects at once.

  5. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    A year of polish and they never saw the 3 different ways to duplicate items?

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      please understandu

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      I only know of 2

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        The bow dropping, throwing items below you mid air as long as they are the last one in your inventory, and replacing shields and other equipment with each other so you have multiple hylian shields.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Have you ever made a game?

  6. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Imagine if they made a real Zelda game again instead of this open world Minecraft garbage.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      have a nice day

  7. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >imagine if game freak wanted to kill pokémon
    Manchild fricks like you aren't worth developing for. That's why they don't do what you want with their series.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Game freak wants to kill pokémon, they purposely tried last gen because of how tired they are of developing it and since it didn't work, they actually tried to make a game this gen. Too bad they can't code for shit.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Funny, if they DID want to kill it, they'd make a Gen JUST for you, then point at the lack of income it generated because it wouldn't be able to be tied into a kiddy anime, kiddy manga or kiddy merch as evidence it should be boxed. But they don't do that, they instead make their games to propagate the anime, manga, TCG, merch and airplane livery sales it historically generated form simpleton kids like you were in indoctrination.
        If anything, they're trying to drive you Black folk off.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          But kids don't play Pokemon anymore, kids play -random game anon heard kids like cuz he wants to believe Pokemon should belong to him-

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          >if they DID want to kill it, they'd make a Gen JUST for you
          It would take 6 year, minimum, of development if they wanted to make a Gen just for me.
          >If anything, they're trying to drive you Black folk off.
          It worked, I didn't buy gen 8, and only buy gen 9 because I was curious about exploring an open world.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            Yeah, that's my point, you simpleton fricker.
            6 years, no income, no merch sales, completely changing the entire premise of the games, just to sell it at manchild fricks that are irrelevant to the franchise as it stands. May as well just cancel it outright, instead of wasting money chasing mnchildren.
            Sorry you're too stupid to understand they don't want, care or need you if you can't accept what they're offering will always be the same - kiddy bullshit that continually lags behind the industry, because industry memes don't sell their kiddy game at kids any better than what they already do.

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              >no merch sales
              They can still make merch for the TCG sets and anime, which would generate enough income. Pokémon GO makes more money than the mainline games too, so it can easily carrry for 6 years while they develop a good gen.

              After it returns 6 years later it would sell to both manchildren and children, making more than ever.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >they can still split the focus of the franchise
                Except they've proved they won't. Tajiri made a kiddy game, it got successful. It's going to remain a kiddy game, to continue to pull in billions per year as every rights holder profits massively from it as-is. You're the gobshite who can't accept that.
                >"pogeymans NEEDS to be for me... because it just DOES, REEEEEEEEEEEEE "

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                I'm just asking for a good game. Not for me, for the world.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Harry Potter grew up with its audience, why can't pokemon? kids today dont even know what pokemon is outside of the cards Logan Paul opens on youtube

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                and if anything, it grew down
                pokemon had more adult references and somewhat edgier mons than later gens

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Why would Pokemon try to grow with a group of autistic millenials instead of focusing on the next generation of kids and their parents?

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Jo Rowling conceived HP as a 7 book series following his life from finding out he was a wizard to ending voldemort. Jo wanted Harry to grow up
                Tajiri conceived Pokékmon as a way to share his childhood experience combing forests and grasslands for bugs to fight against his friends' bugs with modern children. When he got asked for a sequel he decided to target the same age rage of children Red/Green had seen success with instead of trying to age up the series.
                Harry Potter was created with the aim of growing up, Pokémon wasn't. Figures a fricking child like you doesn't understand that, despite many internet articles being written about the creation of both Pokémon and Harry Potter.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >NOOO I DONT WANT CHANGE I DONT WANT CHANGE EVERY FRANCHISE NEEDS TO REMAIN EXACTLY AS IT'S BEEN CONCEIVED NOOOO NOO TYRONE SA MA HELP MEEE-- AIEEEEEEEEEEEE!

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Au contraire, I'm loving Zelda's return to its roots, especially since it's a return to classic Zelda the like of which I cut my gaming teeth on. I don't particularly care for the wants of manchildren who need a kiddy game to change its entire development processes and schedules just to cater to them however and absolutely not when I still enjoy the thing as it is. Especially because those kinds of people have always been ignored by the franchise, to continually shit out kiddy games to brainwash moron children into needing the brand to be happy, like you.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Bitter adult man thinks that greentexting will save him from his seeth

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Firstly, segmentation is something a lot of successful brands do that Pokemon barely attempts. Secondly, this is also why multiple different groups working on different things are very important, there's a reason TPC exists in the first place. You don't really seem to understand much of anything. They could easily be making way more money, although depending on how they do it it could be incredibly short term. If you want some examples of a lot of this sort of thing, looking at the history of the Transformers franchise might be a good idea, it's relatively easy to understand the directions they took it and the ways Hasbro has historically been and is currently doing really well and also burning good will on dumb shit.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >They could easily be making way more money
                How? Please tell me how they could make any more money than what they currently earn by duping moron kids into bugging their parents into forking over money on the incomprehensible cartoony things, drip-feeding their addicted adult charges and skimming off the GOdrones who get nostalgic about their childhood but are avowed pc master race chads?
                They've spent almost 30 years building their empire with surgical precision, by first outlasting the fad status and solidifying their holdings before growing their playerbase authentically, by continually releasing games that capture kid attention./imagination, there's people who grew up playing pokemon introducing their kids to Pokémon and loving being able to share their childhood thing with their little one. And you're sitting crying they won't start making games for 20-something moron manchildren who live their lives online as no-one wants to interact with them offline.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                nta but i think its so funny you suck corpo dick so hard that an anon asking for pokemon games to up their quality has you spitting all these insults. that anon is right, pokemon is already huge thanks to the branding but if the games were actually good compared to other games and not just next to pokemon titles, they'd make obscene cash.

  8. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Delay or not totk is still somewhat buggy. Still miles better than SV could ever be.

  9. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Do they even get to with their short deadlines?
    Im sure if they had 4-6 years to work on it id be better than 2-3 like theyve been doing

  10. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    they have entirely different business models
    zelda is designed as a reason to purchase the system and maintain nintendo's brand as a competent developer
    pokemon shit out games as the launching platform of a strictly scheduled multimedia product line, delaying the games would mean delaying everything from anime, to plushies, to TCG, which make up more revenue than the games themselves

  11. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Nintendo was scared of Elden RIng

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Nintendo could have created a BotW sequel twice the size of Elden Ring since they already had BotW as a base to work off of, but instead decided to spend almost a decade fricking around with their whacky gmod physics engine so you can glue geometry pieces to each other.

      Even if GF delayed a Pokemon game for years that wouldn't make it good. Time isn't the problem, hardware isn't the problem, it's GF and Nintendo that are the problem.

      Nintendo is so far up their own ass that I doubt they even know what Elden Ring is.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      It actually does seem like it
      Totk pretty much is guaranteed goty right now

  12. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    > I remember playing Zelda and it telling me where all the dungeons were
    you mean like how every Zelda game has done since ALttP who literally marks their spots on your map?
    >I also remember my sword breaking after killing an enemy and having to go find a new one
    you mean like how the wooden shields work in your precious OoT clones?
    also figures that you'd be filtered by the weapon breaking mechanic, it's a brilliant mechanic that encourages experimentation with different weapon types and using the physics engine and interactions to damage enemies. (You), like every moron who complains about it, seethes because rather than allowing you to mindlessly swing your master sword at whatever comes near you, it forces you to think, which you are allergic to.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >it's a brilliant mechanic that encourages experimentation with different weapon types and using the physics engine and interactions to damage enemies. (You), like every moron who complains about it, seethes because rather than allowing you to mindlessly swing your master sword at whatever comes near you, it forces you to think, which you are allergic to.
      dangerously based

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      I have the opposite issue. Because weapons are fragile, I will never experiment with anything, because with, say, BotW, you have an endless supply of bombs.
      This isn't a critique against the system, because you're more or less right, and rather a personal issue.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Repair them with the rock octoroks before they break, they repair everything once every blood moon.

        Where can I buy good weapons? How do I grind Rupees?
        Tedium is the antithesis of fun, you soi-guzzling moron

        You kill white lizalfos and get their horns which you fuse to your weapons.
        You clone diamonds to sell for rupees, and clone the horns too to get infinite good weapons.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          Okay how do I buy good weapons in the original BotW? Is there a way I can farm Rupees fast without glitching? Having to grind in a Zelda game seems like shit design to me.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Okay how do I buy good weapons in the original BotW?
            You raid the castle.

            >I can farm Rupees fast without glitching?
            Play the minigame that gives you 100 rupees every 100 seconds as long as you press A fast enough.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            The point it's you don't buy the weapons moron you find them. And Still, there are plenty of sites that respawn good weapons like the colloseum, or you can kill a big enemy and it would have many.
            You can always beat everything with what you found at the moment unless you suck. Sneak them at night and steal their shit, you can even do that at day with a bomb. Theres literally Zero reason to grind weapons.
            Rupees? Just sell your monster and ancient parts

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Where can I buy good weapons? How do I grind Rupees?
      Tedium is the antithesis of fun, you soi-guzzling moron

  13. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Do people still believe this shit? No one is delaying games for "polish", that shit ended in the 2010s. If a company delays a game it's ALWAYS because they are deep in shit and something big doesn't fricking work

  14. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >we did it for the polishing guys, not because we didn't want to release the game the same year of Elden Ring
    Pathetic.

  15. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    You know
    I really WISH I could agree with posts like this, but GameFreak has demonstrated me that they can have all the time and budget in the universe and still frick up

  16. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    god damn I'm so sick of seeing everyone jerk off over this fricking zelda game no matter where I fricking go
    this is somehow proving more ubiquitous and annoying than when the last smash bros game released

  17. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    English learning homosexual here: why doesnt it say "completed"?

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      It's referring to the completion of the game from the perspective of past. So it is current tense.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Good question. You can use present tense when telling a story.
        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_present

        If it had been "completed" though, it would have made just as much sense.

        Ok. I think that's it.
        In the song "Alphabet Lost and Found" by They Might Be Giants (I know it's a kids song) you can hear the word "complete" used the same as here. I wondered if it was something unique to the word but the "historical present" thing makes much more sense.
        Cheers guys

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Good question. You can use present tense when telling a story.
        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_present

        If it had been "completed" though, it would have made just as much sense.

        Hold up it says "was (pm) complete", that's not present tense

        [...]
        Ok. I think that's it.
        In the song "Alphabet Lost and Found" by They Might Be Giants (I know it's a kids song) you can hear the word "complete" used the same as here. I wondered if it was something unique to the word but the "historical present" thing makes much more sense.
        Cheers guys

        The song there says "could not be complete". So not present tense either

        Regardless I'll try to figure this out somewhere else so as not to derail the thread even more

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Good question. You can use present tense when telling a story.
      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_present

      If it had been "completed" though, it would have made just as much sense.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      English don't make no sense. You just say what is accepted and commonly used.
      You could say:
      >...the game was pretty much complete.
      >...the game was pretty much finished.
      but if you say:
      >...the game was pretty much completed.
      >...the game was pretty much finish.
      Even if they are technically correct, they are used less often and sound weird. They don't roll off the tongue.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >...the game was pretty much completed.
        doesn't weird at all
        >...the game was pretty much finish.
        completely wrong

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          doesn't sound weird*

  18. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Imagine party babies

  19. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    zeldACK

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Release next to the biggest game of the year, get shitposted to death for getting obliterated like Horizon did (twice lmao)
      >Or delay the game a year, get shitposted to death by people overdosing on copium because the game sold 10 million in three days
      lol, lmao

  20. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    he's lying. he was scared of Elden Ring so they delayed it for a whole year to make sure they get the [paid] GOTY award.

    TikTok is 90% reusing assets and maps from BOTW. it certainly didn't need 6 years to make.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      If it was paid there would be no reason to delay it. With 10 million copies in 3 days they can pay more than elden ring.

  21. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    the weak should fear the strong

  22. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Be me
    >Be OP
    >Post something i saw on Ganker the other day because of easy (you)'s
    >Don't even have to reply to any of thr posts because i have seen the discussion already
    >Deep down i wish pokemon was better and i wasn't even kidding with my post

  23. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Imagine if GF hired Hideo Kojima to direct gen 10, wouldn't that be funny? Haha

  24. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Jesus Christ the majority of posters in this thread are morons. None of you play other games, you just come on here and shill Zelda. Fricking drones.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Why to play inferior games

  25. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >curious how many people are credited with working on SV so I can shitpost how BotW had both more manpower and time than any Pokemon game
    >mfw finding out more people worked on SV and SwSh than BotW

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yep. We TOLD you adding more people to a project doesn't actually help to make the product better, yet still you insist hiring more staff will magically fix the problems you have with the games.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >tensei realize making Pokémon games it’s way harder than it seems
      >still simp for Zelda DLC
      /vp/ will never realize game freak are good developers

  26. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    It's over. People everywhere are mocking Pokemon SV. The Pokemon brand has been tarnished. The next games are guaranteed to sell far less.

  27. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >polish
    Wtf does this even mean now? Fix the frame rate? Marketing, timing?

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      It means debug phase in this case.
      Totk has no bugs on a surface level, you have to start digging to find stuff.
      Comparatively, SV doesn't even run.

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *