Is 540Hz enough for gaming?

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You are extremely stupid. The sweet spot is somewhere around 200hz.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You are extremely stupid. The sweet spot is somewhere around 60hz.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You are an absolute moron. 20,000 is the sweet spot. Because I’m not poor I have mega big dick computer with 10 4090s. My frames are fast I see into the future, and your future has lots of wieners in store!

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Show me the Mainboard that has enough lanes for 10 GPUs

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            The only mainboard I am going to show (you) is mine, when I ram it into your tight little USB port, Chud.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >You are extremely stupid. The sweet spot is somewhere around 600000000000hz

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Who are you quoting?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      fpbp. hz are a meme
      if you want true motion clarity, rolling scan backlights are the way to go

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      A consistent 1080p/60 is the minimum. Hardware continuing to advance is a good thing.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        third worlder? 1440p/144hz is the absolute bare minimum any civilized human should ever use.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          There is no reason why a monitor should be bigger than 27 inches if it's to be used on a desk
          There is no reason to have 4K on a 27 inch monitor as it is too small for 4K to be a noticeable difference to 1440p, pixel density and game graphics are not there yet
          There is no reason to want a refresh rate above 144hz since anyone who is not an astronaut or an ace pilot would not notice the difference of anything above it
          1440p/144hz is not the "bare minimum" for a gaming PC monitor, it is optimal

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            i actually agree with you, but it is both optimal and bare minimum. 1440p 144hz monitors are fricking cheap, you have literally no excuse to not have one

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    not until they rid of the shit blurring a crt doesnt have

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      There is a black frame insertion technique or whatever, which reduces the blurring. The only problem is that it effectively cuts the refresh rate in half, making OP a 270hz monitor.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      ELMB-sync (backlight strobing) is all you need and unlike 540 you don’t need other technology to catch up in performance in order to properly use it. After using a monitor with everything looks so buttery smooth in motion, no blurring whatsoever.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        monitor with strobing*

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I make fun of anybody who falls for marketing gimmicks and buys these

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >540Hz
    >OLED
    >GTX 1660
    Yep. It's gaming time.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Fastest oleds are 480hz and not even for sale yet.

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It's impressive technology, even if it's not particularly useful.

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    960Hz or frick off

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    1000Hz OLED will be the end game

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >this mid tech that exists today is the peak of technology
      Frick you homosexual, the "end-game" of displays is some shit no ones thought of yet. Creating and ripping holes into other universes where game is real is the end game and OLED is just some footnote on the way there.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I don't know about "end-game" but i hope one day we'll have something like this in our homes

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Make the screen with 90º angle (will look moronic in you average home) add some fake digital frame to the video feed to make it even more 3D like it's not rocket science.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      1080p, the same as the eye's own resolution, together with 60fps, the most fps the eye can see is the true end-game.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      microled*
      oled is disposable

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    anything above 60 is for poor people that want to act like they have money.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I have a 180hz monitor and I say 60 is enough.

      This is a massive lie or you're disabled. Try playing overwatch or counter at 144Hz for a week you'll never ever go back to 60.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        He said its enought, not ideal
        Disengenous homosexual

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      As if a decent 144hz+ is even expensive
      What is this third world cope?

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >540hz
    >games are so optimized they barely run at 165fps
    >you have to play at 720p low settings to go over 400FPS

    LMAO, what a fricking joke, and there are morons who will fall for this marketing crap

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I'd imagine this is mainly for the CSGO, Valorant type of gays...

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >games are so optimized they barely run at 165fps
      >What is the future?
      They barely run them at 165fps NOW

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Whats this for? 4090 with e-sports titles set to low?

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You absolutely can not see any difference between 144hz and 240hz let alone 540hz. It's all diminishing returns/placebo.
    In fact most people here would be fine with a 90hz monitor. The difference bewteen 60-90 is WAY more noticeable than 90-144.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >You absolutely can not see any difference between 144hz and 240hz
      I can see the difference. Though the difference between 144->240 feels like only a 20-30% upgrade at best.
      >let alone 540hz. It's all diminishing returns/placebo
      I have heard that +500 makes your game look like you are looking through a window, instead of playing a game, in terms of how you perceive the movement.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >I have heard that +500 makes your game look like you are looking through a window, instead of playing a game, in terms of how you perceive the movement.
        This will never be truly no matter how many times the screen is refreshed because reality is "rendered" inherently different to our eyes, there is no "refresh rate" it just always exists.

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Finally a monitor to play quakeworld and half life on
    1000fps bros, it's our time

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The closer we get to 1000hz the better.

  13. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >TN

  14. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    240hz>144hz >240hz with fake frames>144hz with fake frames>60fps>30fps locked>console "60" fps

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      1fps >> anything with fake frames

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I have an experimental computer with two 50-core CPUs with 100 threads each running at 10GHz each core and 5 GB L3 cache. 1 TB of DDR7 7200 and a secret unnamed GPU with 1 GB of vram. I can only run Dragons Dogma 2 at 7 FPS. Everything else I run at 60 FPS but that’s plenty for me

  15. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I used a 60hz monitor for years and only recently jumped onto a 144hz one. I don't see any difference whatsoever

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >I don't see any difference whatsoever
      Either you didn't actually set it to 144hz, or your eyes/brain are broken.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        How do I set it to 144hz? Isn't it set at that value by default?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Select the Start button, then select Settings > System > Display > Advanced display settings.

          >Under Refresh rate, select the rate you want.
          >The refresh rates that appear depend on your display and what it supports. Some laptops and external displays will support higher refresh rates.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Holy shit it was set to 59hz lmao, thank you anon

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Cute moron. How does it feel now?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I have yet to experience how it plays in games but it definitely feels smoother already

                You are one of those extremely stupid people

                I just assumed the highest value is set from the get-go

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You could've been stupider if you hadn't realized something was wrong. 60hz looks like garbage in comparison, you'd have to be moronic to not see a massive improvement.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                People only realize how smooth high refresh displays are when they have to go back to 60Hz

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Maybe you're right, but even my CRT was 120hz so I don't understand the upside of ever dropping it down to 60 for any reason

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                GPUs struggle to run games at 60FPS. what makes you think setting your display to 120 Hz is gonna lead to a better experience?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >GPUs struggle to run games at 60FPS
                Maybe your shitty GPU on garbage modern games. Quake can be run on integrated graphics extremely smoothly

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                who's gpu? we aren't all third worlders or black

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                dragon's ligma 2 chokes even on an rtx 4080

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                CRT@60Hz >>> power gap >>> any sample-and-hold display
                you know it's true

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                People only realize how smooth high refresh displays are when they have to go back to 60Hz

                I never experienced a life outside of 60hz until now, so that's why I was so unaware. Another question, do I have to have all my games at 144 fps or is it okay to keep them at 60?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Whenever your frames go above 60 fps you'll be seeing smoother picture

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Assuming it is a freesync or gsync display (it would be madness to not be at this point) just set your games to 144. If they don't have a refresh rate option vsync would automatically go to 144hz but unless you are going outside of the gsync or freesync range vsync is generally redundant.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I have conflicting feelings about your posts. One hand it is totally believable that avg people nowadays are as moronic as you are hence everything been turning to absolute shit.
                On the other hand though, this still has that classic clever trolling from the old days making the other moronic portion fall for it and I just can't unravel which is it.
                Well played anon, well played.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              You are one of those extremely stupid people

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You are reaching audiophile levels of placebo homosexual. And some of them frickers think they have the same hearing range of a dog.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >You are reaching audiophile levels of placebo homosexual
          You are an absolute moron if you think 144hz is "audiophile levels of placebo", but we already knew that considering that you used an anime picture. You probably watch anime that's in 10 FPS.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            > your argument is invalid because of anime
            How disengenous can you get?

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >How disengenous can you get?
              You can't even spell the word, that's how fricking mentally handicapped you are.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                > gets mad out of nowhere
                Your attavic monkey bloodline is clear

  16. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Most games can barely run at 165 fps @ 1440p

  17. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    buying a display that is not some form of OLED in 2024 ishygddt

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      don't remind me anon. my monitors are a few years old but i just dropped 1500 upgrading my pc components so i can't get a new monitor for a while

      You are reaching audiophile levels of placebo homosexual. And some of them frickers think they have the same hearing range of a dog.

      gotta be trolling, nobody is this moronic

  18. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I still remember how 144hz monitors were supposed to be the next big thing and now new games struggling to stay at 60 fps.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      name 1
      dragons dogma 2 doesn't count, because i get 90 fps in the capital and 165fps constantly in the world

  19. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    No, the 5 dollar monitor I have propping open a door in my basement does 31,000hz. I can live with 15,000.

  20. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    the human eye cannot see over 24 fps

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >American genes

  21. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Is it healthy for the eyes to have images flashed at 1080 times per second?

  22. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    i would honestly like to see what it feels like to play like cs 1.6 on one of these.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The games are capped at 300 fps unless you use the fps_max console command and the tickrate on most servers is 64 or 66

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        fine, minecraft then. idk, just something low poly and easy to render so i can see if there's actually a difference between the 144hz one i currently have. i know i can see ghosting of my mouse even with 144hz on this thing, so i'd be curious to see just how smooth that is at almost 3 times higher refresh.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          There is definitely a difference even in CS. Interpolation smooths movement between ticks so it looks like it's updating faster than it really is.

  23. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I wouldn't go above 300 because fighter jet pilots cap around 240 or 260 I can't remember the study I read a couple of years ago
    the "human eye can't see above x fps" meme actually becomes kind of real, although it has more to do with signal processing inside the brain than the eye apparatus itself

    as in, the fluidity might be noticeably different, but if a thing appears for one frame it's not going to be, making it snake oil for esports

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >fighter jet pilots cap around 240 or 260
      Gamers are superhuman and play faster paced games like tribes ascend. Anyway you're right, 300 is ideal

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >T:A
        you reminded me on purpose to hurt me didnt you

  24. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >TN

  25. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    120 should be standard by now

  26. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    MOAR

  27. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Anything more than 100hz is pure placebo

  28. 3 weeks ago
    YD

    Still won't solve screen tearing.

  29. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I play 4k, 1.2KHz.

  30. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Panel Size (inch) : 24.1
    Aspect Ratio : 16:9
    Color Space (sRGB) : 125%
    Panel Type : TN
    True Resolution : 1920x1080

    meme scam once again, they can only use shitty TN

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Color Space (sRGB) : 125%
      How does that work?

      >yeah mate I can show you over 100% of all colors 😉

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        SRGB is only a fraction of the visible spectrum. No colour space that is currently ratified covers the entire visible spectrum - the widest one (as in, cover the most so far) is REC.2020 and no screen covers 100% of that yet.

  31. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I will never go beyond 1080p/144hz

  32. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    why is the market chasing high refresh rates now?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      What do you mean "now"? People have been chasing high refresh rates since the CRT days. I remember all the hype when some Samsung Syncmaster CRTs came out that could suddenly do 100hz at 800x600 and 1024x768. I also remember people buying weird ass korean and chinese monitors that they would overclock.

  33. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    i have a 165hz monitor, everything above 144hz is simply not noticeable.

  34. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    it's just 270fps with BFI

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *