>is a complete piece of shit in your path
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
>is a complete piece of shit in your path
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
Are people just upset there's no DLC?
it is the only gta i only beat once and never came back to it
kind of, it has plenty of online dlc but i wish they were more single player focused. in fact i hate the online aspect of gta5 in it entirety.
It's a fricking travesty that they created such a detailed and fun world and not release a single dlcs, same with RDR2.
Play Online
Online has a ridiculous meta of OP vehicles and flying motorcycles that ruins the fun of freeroam, and a dogshit extremely slow broken lobby system that ruins everything else. Also hackers are rampant, and there are no animals.
No it's awful, thanks.
When I played it, I absolutely despised every single character. When I finished, I just dropped vidya entirely for years.
ahaha what a story mark
Yes. Also the mindset that somehow Online halted their work on games, when in fact RDR2 was being worked on by all their global studios.
question answered
zoomies love shit DLC like Gay cuck biker or gay homosexual protector
It really is disappointing after you complete the main story once back when it came out. World feels literally soulless once you beat the game.
>World feels literally soulless once you beat the game
There's still way more to do in it than GTAIV.
this
GTA 4 had the better single-player story and the better multiplayer experience.
>playing GTA for story
>better multilayer experience when Online is as successful as it is
huh? what? who doesn't play gta for the story?
Zoomers have no attention span so they get filtered by story telling. Gta 4 had the best story out of all the games.
>Gta 4 had the best story out of all the games
lol frick no
VC had a much better story which was far less pretentious about rubbing shit in your face everyone 10 minutes like WAR AND REVENGE BAD OKAY.
>everyone 10 minutes
every* 10 minutes
dunno what happened there
maybe I'm finally having a stroke
IVgays will do that to you
>VC had better story.
UH YOU BETRAYED ME I KILL YOU KNOW LOL
Dementia is a b***h aint it old man?
>UH YOU BETRAYED ME I KILL YOU KNOW LOL
but enough about IV
You know you are kinda right. Gta4 and Vice cities story are very similiar. Only that Gta 4 is more fleshed out. Not that one such as you would understand such a thing
>fleshed out
Drawn out is more appropriate.
I'm not surprised you sound Slavic.
Only you homosexuals still defend IV this hard.
>Drawn out
How exactly. Is the game too long for you? Should it have ended after 3 hours so that you could jump to the next thing?
I've already explained how the game keeps beating you over the head with "revenge bad war sad".
First of. The "revenge bad" plot point is one mission in the game. And the "War is sad" plot point is mentioned more often on friend activity dialouge rather than the main missions. If two or three scenes of "war is bad" Filter you then its not the games fault.
They're not plot points, they're the entire arc of the story. It goes from the start where Nico is trying to find the big bad, to the final mission where Nico has to get revenge for either Kate or Roman dying.
don't forget the revenge is constant with that doofus with the glasses betraying you then you betraying either the 2 Black folk later on and the mick betraying his family etc etc
And lets not forget the 80% of the missions inbetween that have nothing to do with either revenge or war. Most missions are about making money. As I have said nikos search for Darko and revenge is often pushed to the side for normal missions. Even in VC you had missions that had nothing to do with the main story line
>And lets not forget the 80% of the missions inbetween that have nothing to do with either revenge
lol wtf most of them do
there are missions where you kill someone and someone comes after you for revenge
or the several missions where someone sends you to get revenge on a cheating spouse or rat
yeah pretending majority of the missions aren't about of revenge is pretty delusional
Ok I get it you guys are making shit up. I guess you got me with your baits. How could I forget Little Jacobs, Brucies, ULP, Elizabetas, Mannys, Phils, Rays, Florians, Packies revenge missions?! Yeah remember the Jamaicans you killed for little Jacob? I LOVED that part where they came back for revenge lol
I haven't played IV in a minute but I'm pretty sure most of those people send you out to enact some form of revenge for a frickover like Jacob and Packie's brothers.
most npcs do even florian is getting revenge on people stalking him or people trying to uncover his relationship with the guy he's fricking
you also get revenge on Badman with Jacob
If you go by that logic then almost every Gta game is about revenge. Cause theres tons of missions where you get hired by someone to kill another guy because he fricked with the guy that hired you.
>If you go by that logic then almost every Gta game is about revenge
They are.
Claude is getting revenge on his girlfriend.
Tommy is getting revenge on the mob and Lance.
Carl is getting revenge on Ryder, Smoke, and Tenpenny.
Niko is getting revenge Dimitri and Bulgarin
3 protags from GTAV are getting revenge on different parties but mainly the rich butthole.
you IV defence squad members are so dumb it's unreal
I accept your concession
My concession?
You got BTFO here
Literal moron.
I wasn't gonna say it, but yeah you sure are champ.
Same gay. Also nice "n.. no u" cope
I was dealing with two morons the whole time?
dunno how you're going to call anyone a moron when it's you who got blown the frick out
Didnt happen but sure bro but maybe when you repeat your lies it might become the truth
>Didnt happen
see
Did I mindbreak you?
Every GTA game is about revenge or has several missions about revenge because you're a fricking criminal. Most characters will send you out to fricking get even with someone for them.
yes we figured that about you a while back
>Not that one such as you would understand such a thing
are you the rick and morty poster
How the FRICK did you know that?
>UH YOU BETRAYED ME I KILL YOU KNOW LOL
IV did the same thing but took itself too seriously and kept reminding you revenge is bad. Also war sucks 🙁
>Also war sucks 🙁
kek and his stories about war never go anywhere
yes we get it war sucks and you saw some fricked up shit
great
>Took itself too seriously
If the story is about a war Veteran who has severe mental issues because "war is bad" then anything but a serious Story would be unfitting. Also Gta 4 isnt all seriousness anyway
>it's supposed to be serious
>it's not really that serious
make up your mind
Its more serious than previous Gta titles but it still has light hearted moments. That good for you champ or do you want me to type extra slow?
>trying to use the zoomer card while thinking IV ad a good story
my sides
Online is as successful as it is because of whales. GTAIV was the better multiplayer game and actually got good dlc
>story
Does anyone really play GTA for the story?
Nothing will beat SA:O so that's redundant.
What else am I supposed to do? GTA always has a trampoline appeal--fun for 30 minutes a day, just about. but at this point GTA V came out when I was still in fricking high school. No amount of side content could've made this game an interesting 1P experience for a full fricking decade.
the point still stands that V had more too so you dumb 20something zoomer
You said the map suddenly becomes soulless when you finish the game. The frick does the even mean? Does it not apply to IV as well? Why is it just V that catches this shit, despite the fact V having shit like races still available after the story is completed?
>Why is it just V that catches this shit
old good new bad
these people were kids when iv came out so they don't remember the shit it got for being boring as frick
>these people were kids when iv came out so they don't remember the shit it got for being boring as frick
kek I remember Saints Row 2 dunking on it
IV tried too hard to be a movie and forgot to be fun
yep you can tell IV was the first came for a lot of zoomer ITT because they keep harping on about muh story
This, gta v is the best gta.
Frick zoomers and their shitty movie games.
yeah I mean the story was horrible, the missions sucked, and then it was like--wow, this boring world I hate is my oyster. let me get into a car chase and die and then uninstall the game. I can't believe people on Ganker would be coping for GTA V which is such a mega piece of shit that won't fricking go away. I can't wait for GTA VI to have lootboxes and a season pass and shit, I can just drop it right away.
>let me get into a car chase and die and then uninstall the game
Are you talking about IV?
l
we get it you blindly hate V to try fitting in
homosexual zoomer
>talking about maps/activities
>but muh story and online tho
Why are you deflecting?
Ah yes, the better multiplayer experience that no one plays it.
I have not so much as booted up GTA IV since probably like 2011 and could easily tell you two dozen characters/plot points/things about the game. What do I really remember about GTA V? I think the only character outside of the protags I can even name would be Lester and Lamar. GTA V is mostly an empty box, and Redemption II is like the most beautiful empty box of all time. I'm not 13 anymore though so I don't have a lot of interest in making my own fun, and the mainline content in the game is fricking boring. The golf and yoga and whatever else is so unbelievably un-fun and half-baked--who would ever do that shit twice? I feel like you can totally chart Rockstar losing their way, their degradation, from IV to V to RDR 2.
IV felt noble, at least. V I just feel absolutely nothing toward. Series peaked on the PS2.
see
>talking about maps/activities
>buy muh characters though
Again with the deflection. Also, golf was fun as frick. Brushing the available side activities by saying you didn't like them is meaningless. They're still there. There's still shit to do unlike IV. I'm not surprised you were a child when IV released.
Side content can be done well. I have lots of fun with the side content in the Yakuza games, for example. in GTA V, I hated the story, the big missions fricking sucked, I hated the characters, and the entire map is a wasteland. Boring characters in a boring world doesn't exactly pump me up to cross the finish line on every dipshit side mission in it. GTA V is just a repugnant video game, top to bottom.
>I didn't like it so it's bad
>deflecting to Yakuza
jesus christ just accept the literal fact V has more to do than IV
nope gotta keep deflecting to defend IV because a youtuber said it was better than V
More to do and it's all shit. There was never a question of that.
They had side content in 4, even better is you could take other characters with you to increase how much they like you for extra content. In 5 its just slapped on. In yakuza you get rewards for the mini-games which are actually in depth and fun.
Why do people forget 4 had two DLC campaigns?
What does that have to do with the map being "soulless" after post-game?
Ah yes big black wiener and gays and a shitty hour long homosexual biker story which was boring, they were both shitty
Ballad of gay Tony was one of the best GTA campaigns I ever played
nobody asked about your sexual preference
This. Whether it's the car stealing side missions, assassination missions (of which there's more than the handful Franklin get in V), races or still being able to do many more minigames with friends than you can in V, there's just a whole lot more to actually do.
The two DLC were great for replay value, and the repeating, randomly generated gang war/drug dealing missions are something that GTA V should've had. It's nice to be able to shelve the story and just spend a few hours doing side missions that won't run out. Literally all they needed to do in V was at least put the randomly spawning gang hideouts from GTAO into the story to give you some enemies to shoot at.
>World feels literally soulless once you beat the game
This goes double for IV because there is literally nothing to do. I remember when I finished V, I started doing shit like races, basejumps, finding the serial killer's notes, and UFO parts. There was literally nothing to do when I finished IV. I just played Saints Row 2.
I never even beat the main story and I had completed the three PS2 GTAs 100%, spent a lot of time with IV and have no idea how many hours I spent with SA later on PC.
>literally
>soulless
god you people are stupid
Nobody gives a frick. have a nice day.
>game's gimmick is all the cool customizable heists
>there's like 3 in the game and all are story locked
>each path plays mostly the same
Irritates me.
That's true for most games that let you play after you finish the main story.
GTA 2 was better.
If it had better mission design rather than
>Go to place
>Do X
>Drive for a few minutes
>Do X
>Use weird controls of a thing that'll never be used again
>Do X
>Get thing that's needed for later
>Do X
>Leave
>Mission Passed
It'd be a good game. I still play online though like a stockholm syndrome sissy
>Go to place
>Do X
>Drive for a few minutes
>Do X
basically every gta game
only mission I didn't like in V was the crap at the shipyard but at least V tried keeping up variation with stuff like rappelling down a skyscraper or chasing a crashing jet
missions in base GTAIV were all the exact same "go here shoot guys" structure
basically every modern game ever now
GTA IV shits on GTA V on every metric except graphics.
>better euphoria integration
>better story
>better AI
>more interiors
wonder how bad 6 will be now the dan and lazlow are gone
you guys are talking about zoomers defending GTA IV--guys that's a fricking game that came out 17 years ago. can't tell if you guys are real deal out of touch moron boomers or are larping 16 year olds.
IV had a lot of good characters and a pretty decent story, it had good ambience. What does V have? No ambience, no good missions, no good characters, ugly sheen on the world, the city center area is super small and the other 80% of the map is literally a ring road. GTA IV is not my favorite GTA--but it is certainly better than V. What the frick does V have to offer? I cannot believe people are accusing zoomers of hating V. V is literally all they know, you fricking mongoloids. the dudes who hated OR loved IV are in their 30s now.
>still going on about characters and story when they original argument was about side-content available on the map post-game
Yeah it's very weird. I was like 10 when gta V came out, and it's the first gta game I played on console. If anything, zoomers are more apt to defend V.
>t angry zoomer
have a nice day
you c**ts don't even remember the hate iv got upon release
Yeah it's kind of hard to keep up with things like that when you're 4 years old.
we're talking about the map post-game
stop fricking deflecting to unrelated shit
meant for
destroyed
pathetic
>t zoomers
of course you worship a literal schizo
you should follow his example homosexual
>literally bragging about being a zoomer who's opinion is still irrelevant
I don’t think you're very good at reading tone. Nothing in my post specified that i was proud of what I said.
frick off, zoomer
I think I'll stick around for a bit 🙂
Well, halo was never good to be honest.
Based frick gta iv troons, kill all 343gays (in Minecraft)
yeah the driving model specifically filtered a lot of morons early out of the gate, that is absolutely something you'd have to time travel back to 2007 to recall since that complaint was extremely reactionary and of-the-moment. thank god Saints Row 2 was there to scoop those morons up, I hope those same people loved quality titles such as Gat Out of Hell and the reboot that everyone liked so well. This is like people trying to call back to the protag switch in MGS2.
"DUDE PEOPLE WERE SO ANGRY BACK IN the 90S ABOUT THAT DUDE"
yeah ok man, sure they were. you were totally there dude, I believe you, you definitely didn't watch some gay youtube video made by a teenager who read a wikipedia article.
GTA IV was a choice. They successfully iterated on their brand new 3D formula, successfully, multiple times during the PS2 era. A long time ago, Rockstar was capable of pushing out so many great games in one gen. They made five 3D GTA games--and three of them were great. then Bully--better than any GTA to date. Manhunt--which is mostly pretty shitty but does make me nostalgic in some way. The Warriors. Red Dead Revolver.
GTA IV was a big twist on what had already been so well established in the previous gen. It was grittier, browner, bloom-ier, more grounded--not super grounded but by comparison. It had a driving system that people did not all like at first. That is the most major pock mark I can recall from that time--people were, early on, not into the driving. Saints Row had found success being a crazier and sillier and stupider GTA game, so GTA IV is way less crazy, way less silly, way less stupid. Is it less fun? Maybe. I think I prefer the 3D trilogy and Chinatown Wars to IV, but I still think IV is great.
V was fine. It had potential. Certainly a lot of appreciable detail there, just all in service of a game that sucks. Mostly you play as two fifty year old fatasses and that is how the game controls. Trevor is cringe. Michael is cringe. It's shit.
is this copypasta
Don't mean it isn't true.
Also the black character was super fricking boring with 0 depth.
yes the point is you were zoomers when you came out so you don't understand why it caught shit at the time like v is cashing shit now so you see iv as some flawless gem
here, maybe this will clear it up, homosexual
GTA VC = SA > Chinatown Wars = III > GTA IV > GTA 2 > GTA V > LC and VC stories > GTA 1 > London 1969
>tier list
frick off smoothbrain
>What does V have?
it has the funny black man saying the naughty homie word
Kys normalgay zoomer
You are talking to a bunch of depressed shut ins who just repeating the posts on this site they read about IV back in 2009. Unfortunately they never got a life and logged off the website
>logging off an imageboard
go back to youtube
Kys fricking zoomer gta iv fricking sucks and v is much better.
I will never understand why people vehemently defend IV. It was boring brown n' bloom garbage. At least V made an attempt at being fun, regardless of how you feel about Online taking the spotlight.
>I will never understand why people vehemently defend IV
it's mostly slavshitters
>fun
>muh pretty colors
Jesus Christ frick off to resetera
>this moron still going
argument was lost ages ago so he just spergs out
that's usually how it is on Ganker nowadays
I think V is a fine game and gets way too much undeserved shit. Hating it just because Rockstar decided not to release any DLC is silly. It's not the game's fault. You should be hating Rockstar, not the game itself.
Try hard, GTA V and online (before the heavy shark card shilling) were great. It's just that the games aged, and shows it's age. It's not socially relevant anymore.
You do realize the only reason you're upset V didn't get DLC is because you liked V, right?
You're trying too hard to hate on it.
I like both IV and V, but I do agree that V gets too much shit due to Rockstar's israeliteery. The game is fine, it's Rockstar and especially Take-Two who are fricked. They even tried the Online shit with RDR2 and it failed.
NO IV GOOD V BAD BECAUSE YOUTUBE MAN SAID SO
Are you me? I just woke up thinking that GTA V could be one of the worst games of all time.
There are definitely zoomers in this thread--and they're the people defending GTA V because it's been the only fricking GTA game released in a decade and it's all they have literally ever known. They're nostalgic for it. They do not know any better.
>still has yet to be topped
How did they do it?
Early 90s hip hop culture is kino, that's how
I prefer Vice City, but both are pretty fantastic
>I regurgitate e-celeb opinions like the puppet I am
IV and V are both fine games in their campaigns. V is a little more strict with the missions through, and Rockstar go full moron in RDR2 by failing the mission if you so much as sneeze without their approval.
yeah this thread is about right--this is the state of the GTA audience. literal children and some of the most baby-brained boomers that Ganker still has to offer. get some fricking taste, you losers. What's next, TLOU?
>lose internet argument
>start throwing tantrum
boot up GTA V again why don't you, homosexual. can you link me to your youtube where you do epic silly RP? I will surely like and subscribe.
GTA Vs story was the worst unironically
it was way too whacky
>it was way too whacky
How the frick can a GTA game be too whacky? The entire GTA series since 1997 has been all about being whacky.
Hard to put into words compare GTA 5 with the previous ones
It felt disjointed at times
>compare GTA 5 with the previous ones
GTA 4 is the odd one out. All the other games in the franchise have been wild and whacky, but it was only 4 that tried to be realistic and "grimdark". If anything, 5 was just a return to what the series used to be.
>PICKLE RICK!!!! SOCIAL MEDIA COMENTARY!! HAHA GET IT?
Kys moron, get a taste.
>GTA Vs story was the worst unironically
it was way too whacky
Feels like watching a zombie simpsons episode that never ends.
Are you kidding me? GTA VC and SA are considered the best and they are the wackiest of the lot
They had a coherent story at least
The fact it ran so well on 360/PS3 proves you wrong. The PC port is also miles better than IV.
story of 4 was still a lot better
also nico bellic and his cousin were top G
only a fricking moron plays gta for the story
im sorry?
you heard me moron
you c**ts can't even defend IV's abysmal gameplay so you're now bombarding the thread with MUH STOWEE
And that's what makes V the worst GTA game of all time. The story, characters, setting.. All of it is absolute garbage and yet the fricking game keeps pushing it into your fricking face like an ADHD kid that won't shut the frick up.
>morons can't refute that V's map was better who they're still going on about muh story
yeah seriously who the frick plays gta for the story
Someone who's first GTA was IV.
Seriously wtf plays gta iv? Lmao. Any gay with at least half a brain skipped that boring shit lol.
We don't like homosexuals who think as V as anything higher than dog shit. Better get that right.
>buying a gta
>for the story
MOTHERFRICKERS THATS ALL THERE WAS before you had your zoomer gta V bullshit
just keep on buying homosexual cards for $$$ sure will give you an edge in the next twitch race
zoomer losing it kek
>buy a comedy game
>the story is now some moronic drama (muh ptsd->kill 15 of x gang->muh ptsd)
zooomers only want the mp
mp killed GTA
gta was always always about the story
drifting around in fiveM is fun
NO ONE SLEEP IN TOKIO
Is fiveM the role play stuff?
fivem is just a custom server browser for V
there's a ton of freeroam servers with custom drift maps and modded vehicles so you don't have to download all of that yourself, just join a server and drift
very convenient
Sounds pretty cool. I will look into it. So far i have only played LSPDFR and that was fun as frick.
Are there fivem servers in which i could run over people in custom/modded sports cars? Asking for a friend.
your own personal vehicle mod? i'm not sure, but some of the biggest servers with 500+ active players allow you to do that with thousands of modded vehicles
>some of the biggest servers with 500+ active players allow you to do that with thousands of modded vehicles
Very nice.. Thanks for the info anon.
I think people made custom "GTA Police RP" servers where you get banned for not driving like it's real life.
player animal mods are the best, especially during missions where they use character's dialogue
>buying a gta
>for the story
Why are new Rockstar games always so janky and sluggish? They literally have games that are older and controlled way better like Max Payne.
>janky
They aren't janky at all. I think you're using the wrong word.
>sluggish
Because they aim for "realism". This means that every character will have things like ramp up speed for movement and momentum when stopping. It's what gives that "weighty" feeling to things. Unfortunately it's 100% intended and they will keep doing it because they prioritize realism over gameplay.
Yeah maybe i should have said "Clunky"
They're not clunky either. Rockstar games are very well made and polished, for the most part. Literally all you had to say was sluggish.
No the controls are definitely clunky too.
explain how
I don't have to, I'm sure you know what i mean.
>I don't have to
burden of proof is on you
Just look up the definition for "Clunky" if you're so interested.
Either explain why you think the controls are clunky or frick off.
Your answer is just a joogle search away.
he won't because zoomers can't admit when they're wrong
I'd rather reply to you. The definition of the term "Clunky" is: solid, heavy, and old fashioned.
That does fit GTAV's controls pretty well I'd say.
4 is the worst in the series and it's not even close.
cope and seethe more zoomergays
This thread is definite proof that people hate GTAV just to fit in. As previously mentioned, it's a fine game on it's own. It's lack of DLC should be something Rockstar/TakeTwo gets shit for, not GTAV itself. Makes no sense.
people still post the crowbcat threads too
Trevor is the only thing people will remember about this shitty game.
Trevor and multiplayer.
>can't explain why V's map is "soulless" because there's literally heaps of shit to do
>start going on a tirade about story/characters
>can't explain why V's map is "soulless" because there's literally heaps of shit to do
Not that anon but GTA V map is poorly designed. There was no, "in terms of gameplay" design philosophy behind it. It's all just made to feel and look realistic. Just an easier way to impress/please idiots who look for AAA experiences.
>Not that anon but GTA V map is poorly designed. There was no, "in terms of gameplay" design philosophy behind it. It's all just made to feel and look realistic. Just an easier way to impress/please idiots who look for AAA experiences.
You can literally say this about IV's map when it was released too. Especially compared to Saint's Row 2. V's biggest problem is not using enough of the map. There's shit like a prison, but you never fricking go there.
You aren't wrong so i wouldn't praise IV either. SA was the last GTA game i truly enjoyed.
I would say it's more underutilized than poorly designed. It's just way too big for the amount of content that's actually in the game. They could have released several DLCs that utilized the space but they decided to pump all that effort into shit for GTAO
Ah yes, that 90% of the map being completely useless/irrelevant, the absolute peak of map-design, totally SOVL right there.
but enough about GTA IV
>praising israelite cuck and homosexual defender DLCs
I'm glad Trevor killed Johnny.
I thought the DLCs were shit, personally.
This gta iv and the shitty woke dlc's sucked ass.
>R* spends 265 million on the most anticipated sequel ever
>great mechanics and world, make their money back in hours
>potential for varied and extensive single player expansions
>realise 13 years olds with their dad's credit cards will give them unlimited money forever for a half baked pseudo-MMO
>spend a decade milking this instead
>stop making actual video games
>mfw
>stop making actual video games
This didn't happen though. Red Dead Redemption 2 is easily one of their biggest games, and it came out 5 years after Grand Theft Auto V. Grand Theft Auto VI has already leaked, and I'd say we'll see an official trailer later this year for sure.
They used to release multiple titles a year. Good games, too. No one asked them to make a ludicrously detailed, creatively bankrupt tuberculosis simulator.
they've always been about pushing the open-world
you're just being a literal baby because rdr2 wasn't gtavi
zoomers can't appreciate cowboy kino
it's like games take longer to make now or something
>Red Dead Redemption 2 is easily one of their biggest games
Biggest piles of shit, I dont want to ever play troug the story again, I dont like the gameplay or ther characters and the online mode is just the same cancer as GTAO.
Who asked?
>another filtered zoomer who can't sit still for 5 minutes
do people just forget rdr2 exists and that games on that scale just take much longer to make now
zoomers are entitled as frick and don't understand how game development works
the fact a game as big as RDR2 was released 5 years after GTAV is impressive
here I'll ask this: what is good about GTA V?
>what is good about GTA V?
Big map with lots of things to do and see. Funny characters. Entertaining story. Fairly decent selection of music. About 80 hours of content for a completionist run. Big list of weapons that all have decent gunplay. A ton of different vehicles that are all fun to use.
Overall it's a solid 8/10 for a GTA game. I have no idea why the frick Ganker has suddenly switched up to loving GTA IV and hating V. It makes absolutely no sense considering that GTA IV was hated by everyone here when it came out.
t. 32 year old who played all GTA games since GTA 1.
I'm surprised no one's talking about the Pickle Rick collab in Online right now
im sorry what??
please respond.
my takeaways from this discussion:
>zoomers larping as boomers
>boomers who--and I can't believe this--are still buttblasted about GTA IV, damn I thought all those guys went away when people actually fricking played the game in 2008
>Some kind of contingency that likes V because some youtuber complained about (you homosexuals know a lot about gay eCelebs for as much as you complain about them)
>and then a heavy dose of classic nonsense contrarianism
It just goes to show you--I guess a lot of Ganker posters aren't actually playing games? Or just play the most surface level fricking normie dad-tier shit? Play a good game, guys. No need to defend GTA V. It's moronic. one of the characters is literally pickle rick and it's been a soulless cash grab. If you play GTA Online, please, have a nice day.
my takeaways from this discussion:
>GTAV bad because I said so
>GTAIV good because youtuber said so
>my first gta game is good, because......because i say so
frick off moron
Why does that card look like it was printed in 1940
Seething gta iv shill.
It's a great game. If the greedy fricking dipshits at wienerstar and Takeisraelite Games bothered to integrate all of the cool DLC shit to the single player game, it would have been a masterpiece. You've got billions in the fricking bank by the end of it with nothing to buy.
I don't hate the game I hate the choices the made about it.
They basically incentivize playing online where for the majority of it's life cycle was just used to torture people.
too much interaction makes it so you can form factions and dwarf another player's ability to win or play the game fairly without being overwhelmed with people kill spamming you in ways that don't even make sense because there's obvious hacking taking place on what is supposed to be a next gen console.
I expected it on ps3
but on ps4 I had higher hopes.
No DLC means that ALL of the cool shit in the online play was denied to those who just want to play a cool game offline by themselves
a lot of the stuff we saw in past installments were absent in this game like the ability to decapitate people, katanas, chainsaws, and elderly people which was kind of a bummer. The weapons wheel should have been the weapons tree from Hitman Absolution but with the ergonomic setup the last of us had for holstering/drawing and switching your weapon.
Also I'm more of a fan of the L1 R1 setup for point and shoot and feel the trigger buttons serve better for driving than they do for shooting especially since a gun isn't fired with your middle finger. That I suspect can be remedied with the ps4 itself though, they should by now have made those buttons more concave and feel more trigger like anyways.
The map is amazing and the game has amazing visuals so anyone complaining about that is full of shit but for a large portion of the time I've been playing this game I haven't been able to do much because this game requires way too much time and effort just to get a meager amount of money and afford shit
only recently did it really open up for me but it's like 3 years away from Playstation abandoning this system all together anyways so I kind of feel like I got a little screwed. Overall it does have a great story and I liked the decision to split it into 3 different characters.
>hating on V because of the devs/pubs being greedy
That's not really fair. IV and V are both fun as frick.
Online is fun too. I've been playing it on and off since the beginning and have never once bought a shark card. The RP scene is huge too.
here I'll ask this: what is good about GTA IV?
>what is good about GTA IV?
Funny slavs. Funny ragdoll physics. That's about it.
interesting story
intersting characters
whacky physics
>interesting story
Already wrong. It's as textbook as revenge stories go.
Nothing it's the worst gta, boring gray shit with tank controls.
GTAIV takes itself too seriously, and so do the morons who defend it like it's some kind of masterpiece.
and? gta v doesnt and it shows, a lot
zoom zoom, go play the older gtas
>zoom zoom
>plays Vs mp mode
>buys shark cards
uhm yeah i think you are the zoomer
lel
>can only reference the newer games
you ain't bussin, zoom zoom
you have no idea what a zoomer actually is, because youre one
go ask your parents for the money for the older games
braindead moron
>nooo you can't make fun of my age, that's ageist
>iv gets shit for being a movie-game while sainrs row 2 is actually fun
>they try making v fun by adding shit people complains was missing in v
>zoomers throw a tantrum because they're no dlc content or funny eks dee physics
are you implying that zoomers were playing The Ballad of Gay Tony when they were what, three years old?
Maybe he means the zoomers back then. If someone played back then as an 8 year old, they'd be 21-22, for example.
oh I think I finally get it now--so the youtuber that people keep referencing must have not just made a vid shitting on V, he praised IV instead. I can't believe it took 150 posts just to figure out the heart of the issue: it IS zoomer cope. I'm literally in a thread right now where probably 90% of the people here "grew up" with GTA V. holy shit. what a cucked existence.
why are you constantly making these passive-aggressive posts
did being called an IV zoomer really get to you that much
I'm just trying to figure out what exactly is going on here, I expected a little bit of cope but I cannot believe how many people are defending GTAV in here. On Ganker of all places. It is such a piece of shit.
Not him but I liked the game. I enjoyed playing through the storyline and I've spent hundreds of hours just dicking around in the map and in online.
>I'm just trying to figure out what exactly is going on here
People are saying both games are good, and you're losing your shit because it goes against what Youtube told you to think. You literally cannot process the fact even IV got shit in it's heyday.
>It is such a piece of shit
You are overreacting. It's not a bad game in any way. It's a down the middle 7/10.
your world is shattering about you because people actually liked V and it goes against what youtube told you
go post on resetera you homosexuals, nobody even cares about whoever the frick you're talking about. I don't need some fricking homosexual to tell me about gta games I'm not seven years old
>I'm not seven years old
you are mentally
>I'm not seven years old
You are definitely acting like one.
I can't believe I only played it once. other GTAs I went back to again and again and this one... nada.
>All of this IV vs V babble
No one has mentioned a 3D universe GTA because it'll become apparent that every HD GTA is restrictive shit with boring controls, a "play it once and please never again" story and non-existent (quality) side content
As someone who was an adult when IV came out, I love these threads. I don't understand why people are so desperate to defend IV. It really wasn't that good, and got mogged by Saints Row 2, even with it's more serious moments.
Say what you want about V, but it at least it didn't take itself nearly as seriously as IV did.
>Say what you want about V, but it at least it didn't take itself nearly as seriously as IV did.
V does take itself too seriously too, in the way the devs think they were doing some kind of masterpiece in terms of satire and social commentary, just pretentious shit.
>the devs think they were doing some kind of masterpiece in terms of satire and social commentary, just pretentious shit.
Let me guess, you're a right-winger and you're butthurt that there was 30 seconds where the game made fun of you and your stupid beliefs, so now you are sperging out in your imaginary righteous crusade.
lol what? I am only conservative in the way i want videogames to stay games and not pretentious social commentary meta bullshit. But no, i am really not a right-winger. Much more liberal/left leaning if anything.
>pretentious shit
yikes someone took it personally
You underage? That's always GTA's shtick since 3 gays lord via the radio stations and talk shows
>That's always GTA's shtick since 3 gays lord via the radio stations and talk shows
And it used to be spot on, kinda like watching and good Simpsons episode. GTA V is just cringe as frick and on the same level as pickly rick and nu-simpsons and if you think otherwise, please jump off your nearest bridge.
>GTA V is just cringe as frick and on the same level as pickly rick and nu-simpsons and if you think otherwise
Go ahead and give 3 examples of times in GTA V single player that you were reminded of Pickle Rick.
Trevor is literally Rick Sanchez.
shit show after season 1
>a guy is crazy and angry, so he must be Pickle Rick
You people are unironically pathetic.
>Here is your masterfully crafted meta-social commentary made by frustrated Tarantino wannabes and people who couldn't design good gameplay for a living you filthy gamer, that will be $70usd. Don't forget to buy our sharkcards. So meta, hah get it?
Kys gaylord. KYS.
You are clearly extremely mentally unhinged.
>Trevor gets angry because Michael calls him a hipster
>Trevor going on a rampage because some army goons said he has a thick accent
>Trevor casually eating human stew
still better than 4
to be fair IV had a much better radio station than V
damn Gst used to be such a chad
damn shame what's become of SR
yeah it took a nosedive from 3 onward and last year's reboot was fricking embarrassing
I would sooner play a GTA side game as Roman where the main objective was to clean the crumbs off your bed, drive a taxi, and wipe your ass with your hand instead of playing GTA V again.
Chinatown Wars > 3D Trilogy >> IV >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> V
yeah dude 5 sucks
do I fit in yet guise
As someone who was an adult when V came out, I love these threads. I don't understand why people are so desperate to defend IV. It really wasn't that good, and got mogged by Saints Row 2, even with it's more serious moments.
Say what you want about IV, but it at least it took itself more seriously as V did.
thank god the homosexual zoomers are here to defend GTA V. Take Two needs them! Please, upload more GTA RPs!
>REEEEEEEE GTAV IS SHIT
>Rockstar decides to release two mediocre DLCs like they did with IV
>HOLY FRICK A ITS MASTERPIECE
>I would NEVER go on youtube and watch ecelebs
>Everyone in this thread alluding to some youtuber eceleb
Really makes you think.
>6 taking place in modern Florida
yeah that's a hard fricking pass
Florida is basically nutjob central. It will be perfect.
It’s actually a mongrelized mulattoHispanic dystopia irl but people still fall for “le wacky florida man” meme
Still waiting for anyone to tell me what is good about GTA V. Frick IV. Frick the 3d games, who cares. No comparisons please. What is GOOD about GTA V?
>Still waiting for anyone to tell me what is good about GTA V
I already told you here
wow it has guns and a map and music and cars in it? holy shit!!!! thanks for the fricking breakdown, I'll have to revise my opinion based on what you've shown me here
pretty much the expected response from a fricking moron who never really wanted to have a proper discussion
just another braindead moron blindly hating on V to fit into the hivemind
>games is the most ubiquitous single video game of the last 10 years
>"y-y-you just don't like it because they t-t-told you to!"
who are you even fricking talking about? Have I not stated my case about what I fricking don't like about this piece of shit hollow-ass game? this is literally homosexual contrarianism going all the way thru-the-loop
>this is literally homosexual contrarianism going all the way thru-the-loop
You are describing what's happening with all the GTA IV defending. I was actually here when IV released and EVERYONE fricking despised it back then.
yeah Ganker never knows which way the wind is blowing. you didn't have to be on Ganker in 2008 to know that GTA IV was pretty divisive at launch. It sure did not stop it in the end. I'm not asking anyone to like GTA IV--I truly don't give a frick--but am mystified at the double-reverse contrarianism wiener sucking feedback loop that is somehow inspiring Ganker posters in 2023 to say "ahhhh GTA V is good, I think it's good that the characters suck and, uh, I think it's good that Rockstar turned a hallowed series into a Roblox-esque money pit, ahhh, something something something youtuber hivemind!"
The only thing I've uncovered that feels real and not like someone's mental shell-game is that people like V in comparison to IV. I guess that's fine, seems like you're just comparing two fricking turds. and to me--V is an obvious turd--but I would quickly bin them both forever in favor of the 3D trilogy. and even Chinatown Wars. I don't get why I have to choose piss over shit. I guess I would choose piss over shit--but I'm not exactly going to stand up on my own two feet and shout for piss just because I prefer it to shit.
>but I would quickly bin them both forever in favor of the 3D trilogy
I think most people would, however over the last week or so I have seen dozens of people claiming that IV was better than both VC and SA. Not sure if it's just some weird ass false-flagging going on or if they got influenced by some Youtuber or some shit.
To me, personally, I'd say VC and SA were both the peak. They nailed everything in those games 100%. The atmosphere, the characters, the music, the stories, the weapons, the world/map designs, etc. etc.
Reddit spacing zoomer seething.
Gta iv it's trash gta v is fun.
>wow it has guns and a map and music and cars in it?
Yes, it's a fricking GTA game. It's not meant to be some revolutionary kind of thing.
>It is GTA it's not meant to be some revolutionary thing
wow. this is tragic. peak zoomer
>peak zoomer
Is this some sort of projection? I am 32 years old. I played GTA 1 and GTA London when you probably weren't even born.
you already got answers you chose to ignore
I will never understand Ganker's desperate to defend IV and shit on V. Is DLC really that important to you? Do you just want more to consoom that badly?
Samegayging ITT is off the fricking charts
so is the newhomosexualry
Rockstar you had actual gold in your hands.
It's actually pretty enjoyable, felt like watching some 2004 adult swim that aired at 2am
IV fans are the absolute fricking worst.
I'm saying this as someone who likes it.
They really are obnoxious. Kinda like Slavs.
Wait a minute...
Frick this revisionism. GTA 4 only has one good part and that is “The Ballad of Gay Tony”
What is "the good part" of GTA V
it's not iv
>Gta iv homosexualry edition
>Good
didn't even take me 1 hour to refund it, honestly don't get the appeal
it also looks like super dogshit on PC even with max settings
>Seething about a 10yo game
GTA was never good
>most boring story after III
>dogshit map design with zero interactivity
>dogshit police chases
>zero replay value
>car physics are neither quasi-realism of IV nor fun arcade style of 3D
>heists, the main focus of the game, are all boring (except Paleto Bay Score)
>tedious forced minigames like crane or yoga
>the most disappointing final mission in the entire series
>dogshit map design with zero interactivity
Objectively untrue.
>dogshit police chases
They were way worse in IV.
map design with zero interactivity
500 collectibles don't count
>They were way worse in IV.
Objectively untrue
its a great game, just criminaly outdated
GTA 5 was great just walking into a frickin shitstorm of internet trolls and also being frickin partially ran by them.
GTA 4 was good, and laid the ground work for 5 to exist.
Controls got better
they just need the weapons tree from hitman
Ganker desperate defending IV and desperately attacking V will never not make me laugh
they try to say it's about muh story or some stupid bullshit but at the end of the day it's just because one game has dlc and the other doesn't
both games have shit stories
fricking saints row 2 has a better story than iv
>fricking saints row 2 has a better story than iv
based and truthpilled
>people who were literally children when IV released having their minds blown that some people didn't like it upon release
I remember asking asking my mom to buy gta 4 for my birthday when I was a kid and she accidentally bought saints row 2 I was mad but when I later got gta 4 for Christmas I realised how much more fun saints row was gta 4 was one of the original muh movie games at the expense of fun
Indeed, only a moronic basedslurping gayot could say that gta iv is a good game.
>definitive edition releases today
>sudden post-ironic hatred thread
is it even bait if it always works? isnt it just shooting tards in a barrel?
the average poster age in this thread has to be like 13.
I unironically enjoyed it more than IV.
>unironically
why do you zoomers feel compelled to use that word every post
just throwing that buzzword out there for no good reason now huh
ahh yes zoomers love Heat
have a nice day
V had great mission variety. In IV most missions were going somewhere and shooting people, and that as it. Ballad of Gay Tony had cooler missions which bled into V as well, so I don't get the hate for V and praising of IV.
>so I don't get the hate for V and praising of IV
It boils down to one game having mediocre DLC, and the other not. That and meme physics. Basically it's cool to hate V and suck off IV.
never had I ever been so disappointed when 5 came out and learned san fierro and las venturas were not there, and the map wasn't an 1:1 copy of SA, i felt the same with the remake of RE3
that being said IV absolutely shits on V badly, Niko Bellic is better written and has more depth in one foot than the entire V's cast
IV's dialogue is its strongest virtue, it's witty, mature and doesn't rely on zoomer nu-soihumor, watch
zoomers are the Black folk of the generations
>Niko Bellic is better written and has more depth
>muh revenge
>war is bad lol
wow so deep
kek
i'm in no way saying V has good characters but yeah niko wasn't anything special either
assblasted zoomer
>and doesn't rely on zoomer nu-soihumor
What does this even mean?
you're a moronic zoomer so you wouldn't even understand what that means, I know what it means
I'm 39 this year. Born in '84. Please explain what it means.
fair enough, I apologize. It means zoomers are fake and don't understand anything of substance
look IV good V bad so just shut up okay
frickfrickfrickshishishit yeeyee haircut homieaaa
wow black characters sound like black characters
did you have a stroke trying to understand Little Jacob
not gonna lie I came close
>black hoodrats talk like black hoodrats
wow did you have a fricking aneurysm with San Andreas?
>mature
he's never watched a good movie in his life
>never had I ever been so disappointed when 5 came out and learned san fierro and las venturas were not there
This was known before they game released. Stop making shit up to be mad about. Also, there's nothing witty or mature about the scene you posted. It's just generic dialogue. I know you're desperate to hate V, but at least come up with a decent reason.
GTAIV’s story is so fricking bad
I’ll give you zoomers a hint, the reason GTAIV’s “maturity” was so lauded was so journalists could admit they liked a game that they played to murder hookers. It’s basically deflection
Deflection is the IVgay's main weapon.
OH NO NO NO NO
>is almost 10 years old in your path
I remember my friend in highschool being so hyped for this shit. I also remember needing 2 disks to play the game on 360. Fun times.
IV's DLC was terrible so I'm glad V didn't have any
it would've been that annoying frick Lamar
I really don't know why people praise those DLC. Gay Tony was okay, but the Lost and Damned fricking sucked.
and yet you'll still pre-order 6 you tool
can't wait for Ganker to start praising 5 then
oh it'll happen
people were shitting on San Andreas in defence of IV before
mostly zoomers who never played SA and love IV because they grew up with it
pretty soon gta will be a little tykes video game and no killing involved whatsoever
>no killing involved whatsoever
Portraying senseless and graphic murder in media is as American as baseball and apple pie.
doesn't matter what your moronic europoor thoughts on america is, the point is gta will not stay true to its roots. Happens to every game that gets big enough, they all sell out
gta is made by moronic europoors btw
yeah you're not overreacting at all
no, it won't happen because 5 is straight up utter shit, following your logic tlou3 will make part 2 good right? lol
>implying zoomers like V
Most of the people I've interacting with in Online are adults. I rarely ever hear some kid on the mic.
People who were zoomers when IV released and praise it think zoomers like V, when it's more-so people who wanted IV to be more like SA. V at least puts a bit of effort into that in terms of side-content (not DLC). So calling people who don't automatically hate V zoomers makes no sense, and I think the V hate is just band-wagners who keep posting this thumbnail on the regular.
>17M views
that clickbait title worked well
it will never stop working, people flock to click bait titles over and over and over
I'm 35 years old and knew from day one that GTA IV was a total masterpiece that shit all over everything that came before it. I also could feel right out the gates that GTA V was troubled, something about it felt very plastic and downgraded from IV. All those years of hype up until the 360 launch wasted as I now return to IV on PC with all the performance, graphics and bug fixes to experience that wonderful game in the best way physically possible
yes we get it V bad because you're nostalgic for IV
what an ugly-ass game
My god that fricking game looks so disgusting and soulless.
You should kys right now for having such shitty tastes.
>V bad but the IV (which was the start of the downfall for the franchise) good
yes but only because I was 10 when IV came out
What's the matter OP?
Upset the thread isn't going how you planned?
>gta iv's story is so mature!
>dimitri starts acting like a supervillian from a cartoon after he betrays niko
>niko's bff is le wacky jamacian man with a funny accent
>brucie is one big gay joke
>the u.l. paper questline is a great value brand version of toreno's missions that ends with an aerial battle over algonquin
>most of niko's dialogue in missions is him being a sarcastic butthole
>brucie is one big gay joke
I'm pretty sure he's a reference to FPS Doug
What went wrong? It was somehow worse than rdr2. The magic left rockstar after rdr1 and mp3
There is pretty much frick all ways to earn decent money after you finish the game.
Imagine a GTA game where the only way you can make money is some shitty stock market mini game.
>3 protags and they're all shit
>nothing to do post-story (or interesting during the story tbh, who the frick wants to play tennis or yoga)
>missions don't allow any creativity, it's all predetermined shit and scripted moments, like car chases that aren't really car chases, they just speed away if you get too close until a certain distance has passed
>villains (if they were any?) were bland and forgettable
>heists advertised as a big selling point and there's maybe 4 in the entire story
>top half of the map is pretty much pointless to visit
>cops are broken, unfair and just plain irritating
>radio is the shittest in the entire series, it's just a million variations of rap
>all online content they added, like cars and outfits aren't even added to single player
Honestly I could go on forever. I enjoyed IV more personally and that had a shitload less features
>if they were any?
Main villain is the wealthy butthole who uses you. Like IV there are also side villains like the CIA butthole and The Chinese.
IV and V really aren't that dissimilar in terms of formula.
SHUT THE FRICK UP ZOOMER IV GOOD V BAD OKAY
>3 protags and they're all shit
Great way to start your post. Not gonna bother reading the rest because it's probably more lazy broadrstoke greentexting. Michael was a decent character, and despite what people say about Trevor I thought he was too. There was a loyalty and honesty to him that Michael lacked, under his outbursts and lolsorandumb. moments.The both worked well off each other, and there was no need for Franklin to be in the game at all.
They were fricking awful, frick off.
>here's some fat fricking 40 year old but he's a killer even in a fist fight we swear!!!
>r!!!
THEY'RE JUST BAD BECAUSE I SAID SO OKAY111111
stop trying to hard
>here's some fat fricking 40 year old but he's a killer even in a fist fight we swear
I'm sure there are plenty of 40-50 year olds out there who could knock you the frick out.
>my dad is tougher than your dad
Holy frick this thread is a joke. You've got people defending the shittest, laziest written characters in GTA history.
if you think IV has well written characters then you're a clown
The frick mentioned IV?
the entire thread
>zoomer doesn't know about dad strength
I've seen several dadbods knock out gymrats before.
>because it's probably more lazy broadrstoke greentexting
spoilers it is
>it's a complete piece of shit because it has no DLC
All the main characters were boring as frick.
>Franklin had nothing, he wasn't funny, interesting or enjoyable to play as
>Michael exactly the same but even worse because why would anyone want to play as a middle age fat dude with a family
>Trevor was just pure cringe, it was such a chore switching to him in some LOLWACKY situation
Franklin and Michael are nothing alike.
It's sad people can't see past Trevor's wackiness which is basically just his defense mechanism.
better than 4
IV and V are both good games with their own sets of pros and cons. You're a bunch of manchildren who are more immature than the zoomers you're fixated on.
>anon provides details as to why Michael and Trevor are decent characters with good chemistry
>NO FRICK OFF THEY'RE SHIT
never change Ganker
No part of V is allowed to be viewed in a positive light here. Just listen to what the youtuber said and praise IV.
I actually bothered to 100% GTAV because I loved exploring the map and finding the cool easter eggs. The ocean genuinely terrified me. I can't say I did the same with IV. RDR2's map and easter eggs/secrets are fricking next-level.
Reading the back and forth in this thread is hysterical. The truth is IV and V are both decent games, and hating one of them while liking the other makes no sense because they’re so goddamn similar. This whole thread is a shining example of Ganker being a contrarian shithole that subscribes to the idiotic “old good new bad” motto.
GTA V isn't even new anymore, it turns 10 years old in 8 months.
It's newer, which is the point. Ganker always does this shit. Look at the recent threads pretending FFXIII was a good game.
>Look at the recent threads pretending FFXIII was a good game
no joke it was because of youtubers
this board really can't think for itself
Ganker acts like all games came out this year.
that doesn't make any sense
you know exactly what he meant homosexual
samegay
>I’m a disingenuous shitbag trying to feel clever by creating a shitty “GOTCHA” moment
For me it's Radio Mirror Park, the best GTA radio station.
hipster garbage
hipster post
relax trevor
YOU are the proto-hipster
V's radio was pretty meh, but I liked the ingame music.
wazzup homie
>the meme for a while is that Steven Ogg improv'd the whole scene after falling over the fence on accident
>he says it wasn't improv at a Q&A
why ruin people thinking you're a great actor?
>able to make it feel so natural that people thought it was imrpov
>WAIT IT WASN'T WOW WHAT A SHIT ACTOR ROFLMAOBBQ
doesn't that make him a good actor though
GTA IV is better simply because ragdolls and crouching. Getting into little shootouts was a hell of a lot more entertaining comparatively. NPC rub-banding races and those "spam the sprint button" triathlons were queer.
>Getting into little shootouts was a hell of a lot more entertaining comparatively
Aren't they both generic cover shooters?
yes but again old good new bad
GTA V has near pin-point accurate long range engagements, where NPCs are stiff like boards after getting hit. In GTA IV they aren't so accurate at far range, they stumble more after getting hit, you can shoot their weapons out of their hands, and since you could actually crouch you never needed to use the cover system at all.
Compared to not being able to crouch at all? Dipshit.
Some homosexual makes a video and suddenly anything mentioning the actual differences between the games is completely negated. Ragdolls are way worse in V compared to IV, NPC racing has always been shit. And don't tell me you actually enjoyed the triathlons.
>Compared to not being able to crouch at all?
Yes.
Yeah, great job removing something and replacing it with "stealth mode" that essentially does frick all in Freeroam and only works within scripted story scenarios.
Crouching is a way better alternative to the shit cover system that IV has, it would be even more preferred in V since NPCs are a hell of a lot more accurate.
You can't crouch at all in GTA V, unless you count using the cover system as crouching.
Hey moron, did you know you could just simply crouch behind objects over using the cover system? Of course you shouldn't stand out in the open silly homosexual.
Crouching and stealth crouching were both useless. Get over it.
>seething this hard about crouching
You don't understand, he needs crowbcat to notice him.
they removed crouching because it was outdated and useless
that being said sneaking is useless in V as well
>and since you could actually crouch you never needed to use the cover system at all
you do realize you can crouch with your gun out in V right
Everything you type sounds like you just watched that video. Crouching was fricking useless and you would use cover in every single gunfight because crouching out in the open is fricking stupid.
>Everything you type sounds like you just watched that video
because it is
saying IV is better just because of ragdools is fricking ridiculous
he even thinks like clickbait
>GTA IV is better simply because ragdolls and crouching
A normal human would say "GTAIV has better ragdolls and the ability to crouch."
>mass replying over fricking crouching
desperation is a stinky cologne
gunplay was garbage in IV and the guns all sounded like shit
Crouching was fricking useless.
this reads like a comment on that crowbcat video
>crowbcat
what a disingenuous cherry picking homosexual
Only thing I didn't like was characters changing clothes when you're not controlling them. What's the point in buying clothes if they'll just try to change them the second you switch?
your Online character doesn't, that's all that matters
I played and beat the singleplayer for the first time ~3 years ago and I had a lot of fun. I didn't do all the side missions but the main story was pretty solid. (especially considering I paid like $5)
I hate how GTA 4 removed various activities and good rewards for completing activities...for moronic minigames that are worse than free games on smartphones and moments where you sit on your ass and watch TV or a comedian rehash his D-list jokes in a virtual comedy club. I play GTA to be a criminal and get cool stuff, not so I can go bowling and watch outdated satire on a fake TV show.
They were fricking proud of this stupid shit too, with the friendship system requiring you to play the shitty minigames and Roman calling you to tell you to watch TV at one point.
>play the first mission for the new online DLC
>80% is driving to 2 separate destinations
This franchise is just a dead cow being milked now
>80% is driving to 2 separate destinations
It's like I've really playing Grand Theft Auto.
GTA V has no imagination. IV feels like a real place. It’s flawed, gaps of content, control issues, but I think about it all the time and every time I think of V I wish to forget it.
>V has no imagination
>IV feels like a real place
oh christ frick off already geez
you're just making shit up now
GTA 3 is Rockstar's only good GTA game.
>based driving mechanics
>best theme
>simple setting, but always something to do
>lack of story that is instead made up by its memorable cast of characters.
We won't ever peak again.
This is contrarian, but this this will be going further beyond.
Mafia was better
IV fanatics are the absolute worst fricks in the fanbase. I didn't think SA fanatics could be topped, but here we are.
It's 95 percent homosexual Zoomers arguing over four and five, both of which sucked. I'm glad this franchise is long dead and Rockstar is soulless shit, I could not think of a fan base that is more flooded with morons outside of maybe Pokemon
>I'm glad this franchise is long dead
>shitty Remake Collection sold over 10M copies
I'm not going to argue on the soulless front because Lazlow did leave.
I don't give a frick about sales, it's dead to me. I'm not a consoomer Zoomer who uses sales numbers to discuss video games.
San Andreas fantastics are justified because it's a great game unlike four and five.
>it's dead to me
Fair enough. Should've specified, because GTA isn't going anywhere anytime soon as the GTAVI leak threads going apeshit will tell you.
>israelite cuck and gay hag dlc
>good
I will never not love this scene.
?t=191
V > SA > IV
https://www.statista.com/statistics/511784/global-all-time-unit-sales-grand-theft-auto/
Contrarian youtuber shills cant cope harder
>Key sites are now selling GTA:SA for 30 bucks.
I bought it for literally pennies before Definitive Edition came out.
Really? Why don't they just pirate them, they're literally 20 year old games lol
normalgays man, got no clue what the frick they're doing, unironically scared of miners and bots like some fricking boomer, i have two buddies exactly like that, the most they've ever done that I've told them to do was install haxchi for Cry of Fear lmao
I hate how often shit was done in missions which didn't matter at all and would never appear anywhere else in the game. Made the game feel like a never ending tutorial.
I like to kill things in gta iv, in gta v they die from a shot in the foot and i don't like it, i want them to die slowly and painfully
So yeah, i say gta iv is better.
People who were adults when GTAIV came out prefer GTAV for not being a boring brown n' bloom game with zero side activities to do. Most preferred Saints Row 2 over GTAIV. The only thing bad about V is it not having DLC, but again that doesn't make the main game worse than IV. Nobody at the time gave flying frick about muh ragdoll physics outside of being drunk. GTAIV will always be a boring brown piece of shit.
BUT THE YOUTUBE MAN SAID GTAIV HAS BETTER RAGDOLLS SO IT'S A BETTER GAME
Both are trash, the bright colors and the boring filler activities can't replace quality or actual fun with the core mechanics, the last decent gta was gta sa (ps2 version) and if you like any gta game after you should, unironically have a nice day.
>Both are trash
>core mechanics (muh ragdolls)
at least try being subtle IVgay
>Ayo you be offending mah game
>U then laik dis gaem
Stupid Black person both fricking games are stupid janky shit with zero freedom and sterile maps, the protagonist is slow and dies from a minor fall, the enemies are brain dead and the melee combat is boring and dull, there are no gyms, you can't get fat, you can't learn martial arts, the animations don't change when you raise the level of handling weapons and vehicles, the cheats are lame the activities with your gf are a fricking joke, limited clothing, all weapons do the same damage.
Nu-gta suck, only stupid zoomer gays like them.
>Ayo you be offending mah game
>U then laik dis gaem
Are you having a fricking stroke?
Also, neither game is janky. Learn what words mean.
I bet you love nu-max pain 3, and red (pacifism) redemption 2.
Rockstard died with gta sa and gta 6 will be shit just like gta emo gay city iv and dopamine rush with online races v.
Is it possible for you to not type like an absolute dickhead?
>dick head
Can you not be a cringe homosexual?
stop lusting over my head gta v is shit and the gray gay movie game gta iv is too.
trying too hard
>both are trash
>leans towards saying V is bad because "" core mechanics"""
>I totally love SA haha
When did I mention gta v specifically? Stupid Black person wiener gobbler homosexual, gta iv is as limited as gta v.
The physics have nothing to do with it, keep eating dick.
You type like a moron, so it's easy to see. You're not as subtle as you think you are, and have a fascination with eating dick.
english is gay кaтo шибaнaтa ти мaйкa.
>GTAIV defense squad can't even get their own shit right
It's only now I've realised this is actually an online multiplayer game, and thus I have never really played it
The brutal truth: They've never recaptured the magic of the GTA3/Vice City double whammy
>driving is shit that requires no skill
>story is fricking garbage
>locations are bland
>mini games are pointless and boring
>didn't bring back character stats from SA
>shit all over all of their previous games as a joke
>far left slant compared to any other
>removed thousands of tiny details that make the world feel alive in gta 4
Its garbage and if anyone irl tells me they enjoy playing this game I lose all respect I might have had for them.
>driving is shit that requires no skill
>story is fricking garbage
>locations are bland
I agree, IV fricking sucks.
>muh boat driving skill
you IVgays are so fricking delusional it's unreal
>all these claims that IV's world feels alive
>barely any pedestrians or cars around
>not a single animal besides pigeons
>buy grand theft auto game
>grand theft auto
>where are the horses?
Yes it was shit, gta 5 was shit. Its soulless garbage shit with shit driving mechanics. It fails to do anything right that made any of the previous entries entertaining.
For example, GTA 5 is literally so fricking lazy they just spawn cops right behind you on higher difficulty settings. That doesn't happen in 4. In 4 they at least have the decency to spawn cops around the block out of your view and off your mini-map.
>GTA
>difficulty settings
>both the same boring 'drive n' shoot' games
>this much shitflinging about which is better
I just don't get it
that cat looks not very amused
I'm saying this as an a 'fan' of all the GTA games, 95% of the "GTA fanbase" is fricking moronic.
>BUT THE MAN DON'T WOBBLE WHEN I SHOOT HIM REEEEEEEEEEEE
it's pretty much as
states
>BUT THE MAN DON'T WOBBLE WHEN I SHOOT HIM
frick why did I laugh so hard at this
because that's what majority of what the thread is
Who cares? Only Black folk hispanics and wannabes play GTA
V is the only GTA game I've never been able to finish and I've tried multiple times over the decade. What a snoozefest.
GTAV has shitty characters and story and too much dialogue. It's like it was written by a woman. No thanks!
why are you avatar posting as a frog
I forgot to mention the radio stations. The radio stations in V are some of the worst in the whole series. I didn't think it was possible to be just as bad as IV again but they managed it. There's only a couple of good songs and the rest is pure garbage.
And what happened to the comedy in these games? IV had nothing funny besides Bas and V was completely devoid of all humor whereas Vice City and 3 were full of jokes especially on the radio. What happened?
>3
>full of jokes
wat
I think it's safe to say the incessant moaning from GTAIV dickriders got drowned out in this thread by adults who can appreciate both GTAIV and GTAV despite their flaws.