Is this why dinosaurs are not cool anymore?

I want more dinosaur games but I don't want boring ugly accurate dinos

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

  1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    left: soulless
    right: SOUL

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Jurassic Park fans are the gayest homosexuals to walk the earth
    All the fricking fun of dinosaurs is knowing that they came before us
    Just because you homosexual captain Kirk morons think the gorn is so fricking scary people have to put up with the least coherent complaint of all time
    >these real creatures are too REAL why can't they be INCORRECT?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Jurassic Park movie fans are the gayest homosexuals to walk the earth
      Ftfy

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Reminder that the book was always supposed to be a one-off. Its why the island was firebombed at the end. It also went into much more detail on how JP was doomed from the start and NOTHING in that park was an actual dinosaur.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Just because you homosexual captain Kirk morons think the gorn is so fricking scary people have to put up with the least coherent complaint of all time
      what

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        In the episode of star trek called Arena captain Kirk said of the reptile-like race called the gorn: "Like most Humans, I seem to have an instinctive revulsion to reptiles" and I always remembered it because it was a moronic line that made no sense
        Who the hell is scared or disgusted by lizards and crocodiles and shit beyond the obvious tangible danger of a possible predator
        Look a chicken in the eye and you will see the devil smiling, my friend
        Dinosaurs are not scary (lookswise) in the first place, and they certainly wouldn't be less scary if they had feathers
        Take a chicken and give it raptor proportions and you would be shitting yourself if you saw it outside your window

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Don't even need to imagine big chickens, just look at the Terror Birds.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Chickens aren't reptiles.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Birds are indeed reptiles, anon
            And it doesn't matter, because my point was that feathers wouldn't make a dinosaur less scary

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >Birds are indeed reptiles, anon
              No they're not, dumbass.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Please type "are birds reptiles" into Google.com

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                please type in “how do I kill myself painfully” into google

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                The death throes of a man who was wrong on Ganker
                Sad to see

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Okay, now what?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Took you a bit to edit it though
                Appreciate it

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                What?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                dont know if youre the original poster but picrel is unedited

                >Reptiles, as commonly defined, are a group of tetrapods with an ectothermic ('cold-blooded') metabolism and amniotic development. Living reptiles comprise four orders: Testudines (turtles), Crocodilia (crocodilians), Squamata (lizards and snakes), and Rhynchocephalia (the tuatara).
                Not included: Aves
                [...]
                >But they descend from reptiles!
                And reptiles descend from amphibians, yet I don't see you arguing that birds are amphibians. Amphibians, in turn, descend from fish, are you gonna tell me that birds are fish? What about us? We descend from fish too. And we can go down further and further down the tree of life till we end up with the pointless statement of "birds are alive". That is what you are arguing, that there are no categories, just "life". You would lump us, a piece of lettuce and a bird together because we all share a common ancestor. Anyone that isn't a "I hecking love [pop] science!" moron knows you have to draw a line somewhere, and birds are clearly on the other side of that line.
                Characteristics of reptiles:
                - Cold blooded
                - Scales
                - Enamel coated teeth
                - No maternal instincts after hatching.
                - Low posture (Even crocodilians)
                Birds:
                - Warm blooded
                - Feathers
                - No teeth
                - Very strong maternal instincts
                - High posture
                Birds are not reptiles. Taxonomists are solely concerned with ancestry, but zoology and ecology recognize birds as a separate thing, because for all practical purposes they are undeniably a different thing.

                birds are fish in the sense that they descended from a common ancestor. They aren't fish in that they belong to the latter deviated categories
                humans are and always will be mammals, even if we evolved to be functionally an insect ten trillion years from now we would still be mammals
                homosexual

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >even if we evolved to be functionally an insect ten trillion years from now
                homie, just go to China for that. No ten trillion years worth of timeskip needed.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You have more in common with a chinaman than your dog
                has with wolves.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >birds are fish
                lmao.
                >they belong to the latter deviated categories
                So you admit that new categories appear, but you're too obtuse to admit that birds deserve an entirely new category?
                Incidentally, if you actually read the ASU article it says the exact thing I am saying, they descend from, but aren't reptiles.
                You are dead wrong.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                dumb Black person doesn't know that words can have two different meanings
                I prefer the line of descent because it makes things cleaner
                anything else is just an arbitrary line
                The article starts outright with "In a genetic sense BIRDS ARE REPTILES" ergo in a genetic sense (which I was always speaking in) I was 100% unequivocally correct

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous
              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                reptiles and birds are both sauropsids. birds are not reptiles because reptilia is a paraphyletic group. the grouping is based on morphology rather than strictly genetics, since aves is a group within the same branch of the phylogenetic tree. use sauropsida when referring to the monophyletic clade, use reptilia when you are excluding aves. if you are studying genetics, you would use the paraphyletic taxa. ultimately it does not matter, no one uses reptilia for anything anymore. you are both technically right but you are both also moronic for arguing about it.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >words can have two different meanings
                There is no additional meaning of "is / are" that means "descends from".
                >I prefer
                What you prefer means jack shit, the systems exist since before your daddy was even born, and endure because they have their purposes.
                >it makes things cleaner
                Only if you're concerned with where something came from, not what it IS. That's why zoologists, veterinarians, ecologists and transport and customs people continue to use the Linnaean system: it is objectively more useful for their purposes.
                >The article starts outright
                Because scientists know that morons like you can't be bothered to read 4 measly paragraphs to get a full understanding, and so have to guess what your actual question is and put a short answer to that right in the beginning. This author assumed people would ask "do birds descend from reptiles", to which the answer is yes, but the actual text says "Usually what people mean when they say birds are reptiles is that birds are more closely related to reptiles". "what people mean", as in it's a simplification for your moronic benefit. It then goes on to say "a reptile is an animal that is ectothermic and has scales, and birds would not be reptiles.", and explain the differences and uses between the systems, and why birds aren't reptiles.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Thats a long sentence all to reiterate that you were objectively incorrect and can't deal with it, poindexter
                Did the article say as it's first sentence
                A)
                Birds ARE reptiles (meaning descent, of course. As "are" is a word that denotes belonging to something. You know, like a line of descent of something.)
                Or B)
                Birds are NOT reptiles

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Thats a long sentence
                Stay in school.
                >Did the article say
                The article said that birds descend from, but are not reptiles.
                >"are" and "descend" mean the same thing
                Now you're just pretending. There's no way you are actually stupid enough to think this. You are now claiming that you are in fact your father and mother.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Birds are reptiles
                Meaning that Birds belong to one conceptualization of the word "reptile", that specific definition being in a genetic sense.
                And if I'm wrong about this, please tell me why that sentence appears verbatim in the text.
                Please tell me how THEY meant "Birds are reptiles" anon. Which appears verbatim.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >one conceptualization of the word "reptile",
                The word reptile is defined as a creature that is
                - Cold blooded
                - Scales
                - Enamel coated teeth
                - No maternal instincts after hatching.
                - Low posture (Even crocodilians)
                That does not apply to birds.
                >a genetic sense.
                We've been over this, genetically we all have a common ancestor. This is why taxonomy doesn't bother with "orders", and just does clade-of-clade-of-clade. You are still arguing that a lettuce and a bird are the same thing. You already conceded that fish and reptiles are different because they "deviated", you are now just doing mental gymnastics to avoid admitting that birds, too, have deviated. Deviated so much that "avian" specialization and "reptile" specialization are separate things for veterinarians. You have no actual scientific arguments, just a bruised ego.
                >Please tell me how THEY meant "Birds are reptiles" anon.
                I already did, they meant it as a simplification because they know that you are too moronic to read 4 measly paragraphs.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Isn't there a tortoise that carries the babies on the back? Sounds pretty maternal.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Some crocodiles also take care of their young instead of simply throwing them in the middle of the river and telling them to frick off and fend for themselves.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Turtles, and animals in general, will try to hitch a ride on anything they can, doesn't mean they have a special relationship with them. Parental instinct means
                - Feeding
                - Keeping warm
                - Defending
                - Educating
                Reptiles at most will protect the nest till the eggs hatch, and then dig it up to ensure the hatchlings can exit it. There is no post-birth care. Sea turtles will straight up abandon their eggs after laying them. This is precisely why reptiles tend to have large clutches, to ensure that at least some make it to adulthood. Birds prefer smaller clutches, because they take the time to protect and raise them.

                Chickens are phylogenetically reptiles in a technical sense, but the term "reptile" is less favorable in scientific discussion because it's associated with arbitrary classification. Therefore, it is more accurate to say that they are sauropsids, or even more specifically, diapsids/saurians like lepidosaurs (snakes, lizards, and modern tuataras) and testudines (turtles).
                You are correct, though, that chickens are not reptiles in layman classification. And that is something that people overlook - the layman classification can be as useful as the scientific classification, because birds have distinct characteristics compared to all other existing sauropsids (including their closest relatives, crocodilians, with whom they do share a few more characteristics). And though it is not a perfect label, it is the best way of distinguishing that birds are different from other vertebrates closely related to them.

                >Chickens are phylogenetically reptiles
                Mate, I know you just got here but keep looking at the convo, we've been over this.

                >The word reptile is defined...
                No, that's ONE definition. Yours. The one I've been deliberately not using. Remember when I said earlier that words can have multiple definitions? Here's another one
                >reptiles
                Descendant from reptile category
                Wasn't so hard, was it
                >I don't like that definition because I'm autistic
                Sucks to suck ass, but it's what I've been using the whole time.
                >admitted Birds and fish are different
                I didnt mean to. I just meant that it wouldn't really be your first thought when you said "fish" which is also true of reptiles and birds. Birds are just as much fish as they are reptiles. Depends on your use of the word "fish". Fish is a category in a line of descent. Everything, absolutely everything that descends from them are still fish by that definition.
                It's semantics, anon. I'm not denying anything you're saying beyond the semantics. I literally don't care about anything else.
                I'm bored of this so I'm not gonna reply. This should be enough

                >that's ONE definition.
                That's THE definition. Taxonomy doesn't care for "orders", they use clades. You making shit up has no weight.
                >Yours.
                Linnaeus, and all of the various fields that I previously mentioned. I notice that you don't even touch the fact that veterinarians, the hardest of scientists, still classify birds and reptiles as different. You know you can't refute that, and that it destroys your entire premise.
                >Descendant from
                Everything descends from a common ancestor, you are STILL arguing that birds are fish, holy shit. Of all the hills to die on, why the fish hill? Of what use is this to anyone? Show me a single practical use of the fish hill.
                >I didnt mean to
                lmao. I don't mean that in the "light chuckle" way, I mean that in the "I am laughing really hard" way. I haven't seen moronation like this in a good while.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Many cladistic systems therefore redefine Reptilia as aclade(monophyleticgroup) including birds
                Google.com
                "Reptile"
                Wikipedia.org

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >The word reptile is defined...
                No, that's ONE definition. Yours. The one I've been deliberately not using. Remember when I said earlier that words can have multiple definitions? Here's another one
                >reptiles
                Descendant from reptile category
                Wasn't so hard, was it
                >I don't like that definition because I'm autistic
                Sucks to suck ass, but it's what I've been using the whole time.
                >admitted Birds and fish are different
                I didnt mean to. I just meant that it wouldn't really be your first thought when you said "fish" which is also true of reptiles and birds. Birds are just as much fish as they are reptiles. Depends on your use of the word "fish". Fish is a category in a line of descent. Everything, absolutely everything that descends from them are still fish by that definition.
                It's semantics, anon. I'm not denying anything you're saying beyond the semantics. I literally don't care about anything else.
                I'm bored of this so I'm not gonna reply. This should be enough

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                this homie thinks it makes sense to refer to chimpanzees and chickens as fish LOL

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >The word reptile is defined as a creature that is
                >- Cold blooded
                BREAKING: moronic Anon says Tegus aren't reptiles

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                They can only do it during a single season, and even then they just raise relative to ambient temp, they don't maintain a stable internal temperature. Try again.

                >Many cladistic systems therefore redefine Reptilia as aclade(monophyleticgroup) including birds
                Google.com
                "Reptile"
                Wikipedia.org

                >left out the next part
                lmao
                "- though the precise definition of this clade varies between authors.[3][2] Others prioritize the clade Sauropsida, which typically refers to all amniotes more closely related to modern reptiles than to mammals." Take a parrot to a reptile specialist, see what he tells you.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Anon are you actually just being obstinate on purpose.
                >although some people disagree
                Who fricking cares
                Objectively in a known conceptualization of that grouping, I am right. The fact that you can't even muster up a disagreement beyond
                >uh but what about if somebody disagreed
                is pathetic. I was starting to wonder if I was missing something but not fricking likely when that's your best go
                God you're a homosexual
                Why did I even bother arguing with you

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Who fricking cares
                Scientists.
                >The fact that you can't even muster up a disagreement
                You say this while STILL not touching the fact that veterinarians consider birds and reptiles separate. Why are a snake, a lizard and a turtle considered similar enough to fall under a single specialization, but birds alone are a whole different thing? Because they're different things, dumbass, same way reptiles and amphibians are different, and amphibians and fish are different. Get off your hill already, you stupid homosexual.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                As an objective third party, I declare that you lost this argument.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                If you actually want to learn something instead of just being willfully obtuse, here you go: https://www.mun.ca/biology/scarr/Taxon_types.htm
                birds are taxonomically reptiles but since reptillia is a paraphyletic clade based on morphological characteristics it does not usually include birds. birds are feathered theropod dinosaurs, belonging to the monophyletic clade dinosauria, and they are the only surviving representative. birds are a group within reptiles. its a pointless stupid argument. genetically they are reptiles, but according to arbitrary rules they are not. mentally stunted people on the internet like to argue about it for some reason.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                This shit is so moronic. Do people actually believe this?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                'believe' what? evolution? yeah most people with running water do.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I guess people believed in ever more moronic stuff in the past. But I would think hindu fairy tales wouldn't be the style today

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Desiphobic Anti-Hinduism
                keep saying it

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                'believe' what? evolution? yeah most gays and trannies do.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >nooooo!! God is too stupid to design a perfect system like evolution!
                why would you disrespect God like that? Are you israeli or some shit?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Reptiles, as commonly defined, are a group of tetrapods with an ectothermic ('cold-blooded') metabolism and amniotic development. Living reptiles comprise four orders: Testudines (turtles), Crocodilia (crocodilians), Squamata (lizards and snakes), and Rhynchocephalia (the tuatara).
                Not included: Aves

                Where did they get the atavistic genetics for teeth, anon?

                >But they descend from reptiles!
                And reptiles descend from amphibians, yet I don't see you arguing that birds are amphibians. Amphibians, in turn, descend from fish, are you gonna tell me that birds are fish? What about us? We descend from fish too. And we can go down further and further down the tree of life till we end up with the pointless statement of "birds are alive". That is what you are arguing, that there are no categories, just "life". You would lump us, a piece of lettuce and a bird together because we all share a common ancestor. Anyone that isn't a "I hecking love [pop] science!" moron knows you have to draw a line somewhere, and birds are clearly on the other side of that line.
                Characteristics of reptiles:
                - Cold blooded
                - Scales
                - Enamel coated teeth
                - No maternal instincts after hatching.
                - Low posture (Even crocodilians)
                Birds:
                - Warm blooded
                - Feathers
                - No teeth
                - Very strong maternal instincts
                - High posture
                Birds are not reptiles. Taxonomists are solely concerned with ancestry, but zoology and ecology recognize birds as a separate thing, because for all practical purposes they are undeniably a different thing.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Where did they get the atavistic genetics for teeth, anon?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Chickens are phylogenetically reptiles in a technical sense, but the term "reptile" is less favorable in scientific discussion because it's associated with arbitrary classification. Therefore, it is more accurate to say that they are sauropsids, or even more specifically, diapsids/saurians like lepidosaurs (snakes, lizards, and modern tuataras) and testudines (turtles).
            You are correct, though, that chickens are not reptiles in layman classification. And that is something that people overlook - the layman classification can be as useful as the scientific classification, because birds have distinct characteristics compared to all other existing sauropsids (including their closest relatives, crocodilians, with whom they do share a few more characteristics). And though it is not a perfect label, it is the best way of distinguishing that birds are different from other vertebrates closely related to them.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Humans are fish, anon. And Mosquitos are crustaceans.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Feathercucks are autistic trekkies that shit and piss their pants out of fear when their mummykins gives them chicken tendies
          Le MAO

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            trying a little too hard with that one

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous
        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          What in the frick? Somehow a star trek episode has everything to do with Jurassic Park?!?

          This is actually schizophrenia.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >these real creatures are too REAL why can't they be INCORRECT?
      unless it's a documentary trying to teach you something, the most important part of designing a monster for a video game is that it looks good. Not that it's accurate. It's the same as saying the troony with an extra chromosome female lead of the latest AAA game is good because it's "realistic" even if it's unappealing to look at.

      I'm a feather enjoyer because it's more interesting to know about the real animals than some autistic fantasy, but if you actually give a shit about realism in video games and movies, you're autistic.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Wasn't Jurassic Park's depictions of stuff as accurate as they could be based off the limited information we had for ones like Spino at the time? I like dinosaurs but I'm not as autistic as some and I vaguely remember hearing or reading about how Spinosaurus had very few fossils and shit discovered up until recently.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I've heard the same. That's why I said fans and not filmmakers.
        It's children who grew up thinking dinosaurs looked like that and threw a fit when the consensus changed

  3. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Jurassic Park fans are the manliest chads to walk the earth
    All the fricking fun of dinosaurs is knowing that they look cool
    Just because you based Alan Grant chads think Godzilla is fricking scary means accuracy gays need to stfu and kill themselves all the time.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >forgetting the meme arrow

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      How did you make Gigachad say that? Did he really say that? Asking for a fren

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      in the first movie grant spergs about birds to spook a kid

      Jurassic Park fans are the gayest homosexuals to walk the earth
      All the fricking fun of dinosaurs is knowing that they came before us
      Just because you homosexual captain Kirk morons think the gorn is so fricking scary people have to put up with the least coherent complaint of all time
      >these real creatures are too REAL why can't they be INCORRECT?

      >Jurassic World fans are the gayest homosexuals to walk the earth
      ftfy

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        He also looks at a giant skeleton of a raptor and calls it a velociraptor

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >He called the raptor a raptor!

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Velociraptors were the size of a dog

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Some dogs are pretty big

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Diferent species don't matter anymore because I don't want my argument to get btfo

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              They literally only call them Velociraptors in the movie because some writer decided Dinonychus was too tough to pronounce.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                The ancient Greeks managed it just fine until the Romans changed his name

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Well the Greeks and Romans also fricked little boys, so maybe we don't base modern things on them.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Well the Greeks and Romans also fricked little boys, so maybe we don't base modern things on them.
                That implies pedophilia isn't a growing problem in the modern day

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It's only a growing problem in churches and red states

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                on most days I would engage with this bait, but I can't be bothered today

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >truth
                >bait
                Remind me again which states fight the fiercest against child brides getting outlawed.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >marriage is... LE BAD
                >unless it's gay marriage

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >SEX IS... LE BAD
                >unless the girl is less than 15yo

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                we can talk about that when you stop advocating for grooming children in public schools

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Sex education is "grooming"? Better arrest all parents who give their kids The Talk.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                the way it's being done now is definitely grooming, and you know it

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                when you promote unnatural and unhealthy behavior, then yeah it is.

                >wahhhhhhh, my children are being taught not to hate gay people, this is GROOMING
                >indoctrinating them into my made up sky daddy religion isn't grooming though
                >even when the priest literally molests them

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                are these "priests" in the thread with us right now?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >even when the priest literally molests them
                gay priests

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It is acceptable when we do it, yes. You are wrong, we are right.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                when you promote unnatural and unhealthy behavior, then yeah it is.

                I know, right, knowing about the physical construction of the human body, how pregnancy works, and how to use contraceptives properly is horrid and an affront to God.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                too disingenuous to bother with
                you know the truth, I know the truth, you just need to lie about it

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Shit morons write on /misc/ isn't le truth.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Anything that's an affront to their sky daddy is a boon to civilization

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >telling kids to shove stuff up their buttholes is perfectly normal chud!

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Rent free, fundie

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                when you promote unnatural and unhealthy behavior, then yeah it is.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                A rabbi is 27 times more likely to rape a child than a catholic priest, the rate only goes up when its his own children too

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Cheers mate

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You do realize that public schools have a significantly higher rate of pedophilia than the catholic church had at its worst, right?

                That was because in the novel Crichton based them on a paleontologist's work who claimed Deinonychus and Velociraptor were the same animal and combined their scientific names.

                Not the same animal, but different species of the same genus. Like how lions and tigers are both panthers, Panthera leo and Panthera tigris.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                They were separated by 30 million years and an entire hemisphere, they're not so related we can call them the exact same animal.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Did the God appointed head of American public schools declare the problem a pontifical secret and threaten the staff with excommunication if they informed the police in any way about cases of child abuse?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >problem

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >suddenly out of ten

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          well they did find utahraptor shortly after the movie was released

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            AFTER the movie released. It's not based on Utahraptor. The Jurassic franchises Velociraptor is Deinonychus in everything but name.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Maybe because it’s a velociraptor and not a fricking hawk you dumbass

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >being this obtuse
            On the off chance you're just autistic i'll explain it. The "velociraptors" in the jurassic series aren't velociraptors in anything but name. They're far too big and their skeletal structure is too robust. They were meant to be deinonychus but for whatever reason someone somewhere decided calling them velociraptor worked better.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              That was because in the novel Crichton based them on a paleontologist's work who claimed Deinonychus and Velociraptor were the same animal and combined their scientific names.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Is that what it was? I thought he just thought Velociraptor was a cooler name.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          This was done purely because Velociraptor is easier for kids to say than Deinonychus

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >in the first movie grant spergs about birds to spook a kid
        It's merely elementary my dear homosexual

  4. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    you can hide with your hands covering your eyes saying LALALALA I CANT HEAR YOU all you want but it wont change the reality.
    i like both, including the inaccurate versions. i mean it was only a select few types that had feathers, anyways. dont act like theyre taking away all of your little dinosaur toys.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >you can hide with your hands
      I don't need to hide nothing. They are dead for millions of years.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >I like the accurate ones better!
      You and 76 other people.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        For comparison. The people have spoken. Feathergays are all alone.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >heavily promoted brand.....sells more than an indie game?
          Stop the fricking presses!

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          you're an imbecile

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Um, anon, Evolution 2 has had feathered dinosaurs in it since the Biosyn DLC over a year ago.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >t-rex with a JUST haircut
            kek

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              It's Yutyrannus, currently the largest-known carnivorous dinosaur with direct evidence of feathers.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                ooooah that yutty

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Weird ask but its a old ass gif pre 2010, you got the same one of this image only dicks coming out everywhere? Shit always made me laugh.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            thats not a dinosaur, that's a goat
            you cant fool me

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Yeah but they are like 5% of the roster so it’s ok.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Only DLC I didn't buy

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              The Biosyn DLC?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >The worst selling DLC
            There is a reason that DLC gets the deepest sales every sale.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          feathergays in shambles

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        For comparison. The people have spoken. Feathergays are all alone.

        *Ding *Ding

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          uh oh its the moron alert

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        the frick did they do in 2022?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        i like feathers and even i dont know what the frick that game is
        youre trying to use a Literally Who? game as some kind of "argument" ?
        plus im not even talking about what is more popular. im sure unfeathered is because thats what people grew up with. im merely saying that popular =/= the reality.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          The game released within a few months of Jurassic World Evolution 2. They were pitted as direct competitors. Feathergays claimed it would be the Jurassic Park killer because of its scientific accuracy.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >i mean it was only a select few types that had feathers, anyways. dont act like theyre taking away all of your little dinosaur toys.
      And by some, you mean all theropoda.
      Protofeathers were found on their earliest ancestors, and once a covering is developed - it's extremely rare for it to be phased away. Hell, even disregarding birds/dinosaurs - whales are still hairy, with nearly full body coverage of thin, sparse hairs, 40 million years since they opted out of land.

      So, it's more of a case of - we didn't discovered a well enough preserved impression of feathers on most species' fossils. Fossilization as a process is rare enough already. Soft tissue leaving impressions are a literal cosmic stroke of luck.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >It's just a FEW
      Classic libtard tactic

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        are you conflating paleontology and social science or something, moron?
        its not a slippery slope or anything, theyre not coming for your precious scalebabies.
        also im not a libcuck but jesus you are obsessed.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >
      you can hide with your hands covering your eyes saying LALALALA I CANT HEAR YOU all you want but it wont change the reality.
      i like both, including the inaccurate versions. i mean it was only a select few types that had feathers, anyways. dont act like theyre taking away all of your little dinosaur toys.
      What a disingenuous, gaslighting little homosexual you are
      You, as a human being(or atleast your parents attempt to make one), are as related to Dinosaurs as modern birds are.
      If Dinosaurs are related to mammals, why don't we give them fur then?
      Also why don't we give all Dinosaurs gills because they are related to fish?

      What a brainlet.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        because there was feather-like imprints found in the fossils and they are physiologically more related to birds than other types of animals that exist today. holy moron

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Yeah you realise carbon dating is highly inaccurate and fossils are literally fake and gay
          Archeologists find one bone and concoct a children’s story how this “dinosaur” lived 65 million years ago
          >believing in dinosaurs in 2024
          moron

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            It supports their gay fluffy gooning fanfic. Thats why they insist on believing in it.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >carbon dating is highly inaccurate
            Source? Btw, brain damage isn't a source.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            luckily carbon dating isn't used for million year time scales

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >carbon dating is highly inaccurate
            ...on the scale of centuries

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      warm blooded CLOAKA SEXO

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >i mean it was only a select few types that had feathers, anyways
      don't bother with logic. Anti-realismgays will use the most disingenuous arguments possible when it comes to dinosaurs.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        yeah feathergays are autistic and will seethe and scream and cry about how pesky things like facts are "ruining their heckin fluffirinos chonky bois" when someone finds skin impressions without feathers

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >feathered dinos are way more frickable than lizards
      Now we know why they pushed the feathered dino meme so hard

  5. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The big dinos probably did not have any feathers just like our big mammals dont have hair, they dont need it. It would lead to overheating even. The smaller, the more need for insulation, so small theropods had feathers, large ones did not. Spino is safe, stop sperging out.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      All non-aquatic large mammals have hair, tho. There are more purposes for that than mere thermal insulation

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >mammals
        Lizards anon, lizards.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Lizards aren't mammals

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Anon-kun.... I...

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          wojak beard

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          So most if not all dinosaurs probably had sone kind of protofeathers as well. Glad we agree.

  6. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >to the left
    A chimera that isnt a spinosaurus
    >to the right
    A meme

  7. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Let's not pretend you wouldn't piss yourself if you encountered one of these creatures for real even if they looked goofy as shit.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Do you piss and shit yourself when you see a chicken?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >scientifically accurate dinos aren't scar-

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Its creepy but it doesn't look like a dinosaur. Its looks like a chimera made out of turkeys and reptiles

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Imagine how weird your dinos would look to someone went to The Great Exhibition and who was sure they all looked like this.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Doesn't like a chimera. Doesn't like a hybrid lizard with a coat of feathers. It just looks like reptile that could exist.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I'd piss myself if I saw a chicken that was the size of a house

  8. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I've stopped paying attention to paleontology outside of checking the fossils of the animals. If reconstructions change this fricking much, I can only wonder how wrong we have their classification. We lucked out that birds at least give us an idea on how to reconstruct and classify these animals, to a certain degree that we can get some things right.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It kinda blows my mind that people just accepted shrink-wrapped renditions of dinosaurs and fishes without question, and now the pendulum swings to the other side of moronation with the giant fluffy feathered dinosaurs.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        The thibg with "shrink wrapped" dinos is that that is generally how reptiles look given their bone structure. Hell even most birds without feathers and shit would appear "shrink wrapped" so its really not as bad as an assumption people make it out to be.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Are you just now learning the scientific process?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Science is a meme

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          unless its science from my childhood right?

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          This, they're just demonic falsehoods meant to distract you from God

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Why would God allow Satan to create things that turn his most precious creation from him, especially when he's omnipotent, omnipresent, and omniscient?

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Why not

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Existence is fictional to God. Fiction without conflict is boring.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Is that why he also makes his creations sin so he can send them to eternal torture?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Yes.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                God is an butthole.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah, it sucks.

  9. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I'm glad that spinogays got shit on
    They were fricking insufferable after JP3 came out

  10. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Jurassic Park millenials are still mad about spinosaurus killing a t.rex in 3 lol.

  11. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >but I don't want boring ugly accurate dinos
    They're not even accurate.

    Most paleoartists are actually so far up their asses they're giving scientists full on migraines.

    Did you know that most evidence for feathers were found on small(think chicken to dog size) dinosaur species? That all evidence points to T-Rex having maybe a little fluff on its cranium and spine?

    But paleo"artists" are flooding the net with full on birds.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah
      >paleontologists say they found evidence of some kind of feathers on many dinosaurs
      >Paleoartists
      EVERYTHING WAS FRICKING FLUFFY!

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      There's direct evidence of the Yutyrannus having had feathers and they were very big.

  12. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    New spino is cool as frick, haters can eat my ass

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Living in Florida next to a large river, I'd never go close to the shore if that thing still existed

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >we want the tadpole audience

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        The tadpole audience is big money, dude.

  13. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    right looks better

  14. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Screaming b***hbabies so angry about the real world they make moronic images to vent their pussy frustrations.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This thing probably didn't come on land very often.

  15. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous
    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      all of those things about cats are true other than them killing humans

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      All those things about cats are true including them killing humans

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      dinos look like that because crocodiles, alligators and lizards look like that.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The people who make these sorts of images fail to realize that bonds can tell you what sorts of muscles were anchored to them, and also fail to understand the differences in fat and muscle distribution between mammals (along with proto-mammals) and saurians.

  16. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    QRD on what happened to the Spinosaurus in 2020? I don't follow dinodrama.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The favorable interpretation now is that dinosaurs had feathers like birds.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        But that is older than 2020.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      A lot of what we "knew" about spino were educated guesses and inferences based on it's closest cousins, since the original fossil was destroyed in WW2.
      New fossil got found and it turned out a lot of what we thought we knew about spino was wrong, JP homosexuals as usual started having a shitfit because spino was not the badass TRex killer of the movie

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        There were people who were angry at the first JP movie because the Tyrannosaurus wasn't portrayed in the upright tripod stance it had been in all media before it.

  17. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >NOOOOO I DON'T LIKE THAT DINOSAURS ARE BIRDS!!
    imagine being such a pleb
    birds > lizards

  18. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Does someone have that meme where crocodiles are reimagined with feathers

  19. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >these giant lizards? Nah bro see they're actually giant birds because we found this one fossil of a tiny bird and assumed it was a dinosaur cause we are mouth breathing morons
    Dinosaurs are fiction made up to save museums from going bankrupt in the 1800s

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The tiny arms is what gets me, why people thought they had tiny arms? They can't even look at their arms.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        They didn't need large arms when they had huge heads filled with steak knives/armor-piercing spikes. In fact many predators don't even have arms at all.

  20. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    This outrage about feathers feels like a ruined childhood scenario where kids thought dinosaurs were cool lizards and birds were gay. I've always been more a insectgay so I never gave a shit about dinos to be honest.

  21. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Spinosaurus was never cool

  22. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous
    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The only people saying theropods only ate plants are Christians.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      1920's paleontologist also destroyed any evidence that refuted their theories. Like how the bones of the nephilim were destroyed by the British since it went against evolution theory.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Like how the bones of the nephilim were destroyed by the British since it went against evolution theory.
        Sauce for this? I know that archeology is one hell of a corrupt science, but concrete evidence is always welcome

  23. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Stop crying about real dinosaurs not being the movie monsters you grew up with, you still have your fictitious demon freaks to cheer for in media.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      LMAO It's like a lookism meme in dinosaur form. Almost as bad as the shit from 65.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >chudsaurus

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >billions must evolve

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Wtf is that smashed and slammed fricking thing?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Wtf is that smashed and slammed fricking thing?

      LMAO It's like a lookism meme in dinosaur form. Almost as bad as the shit from 65.

      >billions must evolve

      lol

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        haha

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Lmao did you make this?

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Yeah

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Thanks for the laugh then

      • 4 weeks ago
        Awanama

        My sides

        1920's paleontologist also destroyed any evidence that refuted their theories. Like how the bones of the nephilim were destroyed by the British since it went against evolution theory.

        >1920's paleontologist also destroyed any evidence that refuted their theories. Like how the bones of the nephilim were destroyed by the British since it went against evolution theory
        Frickin brits!

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        This is the only jak shit I laugh too
        Good job anon

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        well done

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Quality content? On Ganker?
        Preposterous

  24. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    crazy how all feathercels are literally furries

  25. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    dinosaurs are lizards
    pluto is a planet
    there are only two genders
    just say no to drugs

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >dinosaurs are lizards
      Reptiles. Lizards are the squatty, quadrupedal goobers tanning on rocks - think Geckos.
      >pluto is a planet
      Problem with Pluto is, if we call it a planet - then we would have to call over a dozen other objects in our solar system planets as well. Better add an extra criteria and excise Pluto, than add fourteen extra planets on top of it.
      >there are only two genders
      Correct
      >just say no to drugs
      You're not my dad.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >than add fourteen extra planets on top of it.
        Honestly, why not? I mean people would actually know about those other 14 extra planets if we did. Seems the only thing that came from Pluto not being a planet is just people only talk about Pluto not being a planet. It doesn't seem very constructive. But honestly it doesn't even fricking matter. We aren't getting to space anymore. We're too busy arguing about if shit had feathers from a million years ago or if Pluto is actually a planet.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Honestly, why not?
          Adding Eris, Ceres and all these other rocks would turn everything into a mess with their often eccentric, messy orbits. So they invented an extra criteria to keep them out of the planet status, that being they are too small to clear their orbit of junk, unlike the OG's that were massive enough to slingshot everything out of their orbits.
          But then, extra observation evidenced that Pluto is actually behaved exactly the same as these other Dwarf Planets, So the conundrum was less "Let's kick Pluto out, it sucks" and more "Do we make an arbitrary exception for Pluto for old times sake?". And they decided to be consistent about definitions.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Because people don't want to call every pebble a planet, it would just be silly. Ceres wasn't a planet before. Planet has a special place in categories so devaluating it just for a few autist would be counter productive as nobody could be sure how many planets there are or where to end.

          All categories are manmade. Including genders.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            There's only 14 pebbles in the entire solar system? Damn, we should probably know about them.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            moronic. Planets are like a step on categorizing a continuity like a rise vs a hill vs a mountain, sex is like the difference between a rib and a femur

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >All categories are manmade. Including genders.
            Correct insofar as language and taxonomy are manmade, but sexual dimorphism is clearly something that exists in nature
            'Gender' doesn't exist, period

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Actual science doesn't particularly care about popsocial memes or whatever you learned from Rick and Morty.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Dinosaurs are not reptiles though. They belong to a different classification, crocodiles are reptiles and Pterosaurs too, but not dinosaurs

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          They're archosaurs, as are crocodiles. Archosaurs are reptiles. End of discussion.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Archosauria, like sauropsida is a monophyletic group. Reptilia is paraphyletic. Archosaurs are not all reptiles because birds are not members of reptilia. Sauropsida is the monophyletic sister clade of reptilia.

  26. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  27. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    For me, it’s Carnivores Dinosaur Hunter, the premier dinosaur video game, on iPad pro. Maxed graphics. paid version no micro transactions. Just pure dino goodness. PC keks and your outdated Carnivores 2 need not reply

  28. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I'm here to remind you that our depiction of dinosaurs has little to do with our scientific understanding and more to do with our current cultural mindset.

    Same thing with our interpretation of the past in general. It is all in relative terms to our current culture and we project our cultural feelings on to the past.

  29. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why do JP gays always ignore the scene in the move when Grant said dinosaurs were birds?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Because it immediately dismantles their autism.
      JP was on the same page as modern depictions, it's just that 35 years ago they weren't aware of just how right they were.
      Nowadays, they keep regurgitating the same wingless dragons, because they're recognizable product to sell, not a passion project of Crichton and Horner.

  30. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You'll never guess what dinosaurs looked like
    Hint: it's even lamer than you could possibly imagine
    t. time traveler

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      was the lusitania an inside job

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >heh, dinos with feathers? That's so gay! Chickens arent scary
      >boom boom boom
      >huh what's that noi-AAACKK AAHHH ANON HELP ME THE GIANT DEATHCHICKEN IS EATING ME AAAAIIIIIIIII ACCK

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Now they do look gay though.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        return to kulu yaku

  31. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Dinosaurs aren't cool anymore because the various markets got oversaturated and everyone got sick of them, just like how Super Heroes aren't cool anymore because the various markets got oversaturated and everyone got sick of them.

  32. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous
    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      bravo miyazaki

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Why isn't the herbivore fighting back?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Frontier hasn't given sauropods defensive animations, aside from stomping the ground to throw pack hunters off. They can't defend themselves from larger theropods at all.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      just like real life

  33. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    spinosaurus has always been the reddit dinosaur so they deserve it

    Also if you play pic related have a nice day

  34. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Feathered dinosaurs are gay and paleontology is a soft science. And like all soft sciences, the people who study it should kill themselves out of shame at being such massive gays.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It's a hard science, though. Artistic illustrations aren't scientific publications.

      Kindly remove yourself from the genepool.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >A found a single rib and then reconstructed an entire creature from it!
        It's softer than the soft spot of your skull (which is an achievement in all honestly (since you are a baby))

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >uuh, this gigantic rib probably was orobaly formed by magic!
          Take a hammer and burst your nutsack. Now.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Extremely epic strawman soft science moron. Get back to the unemployment line.

            Actual clinical moronation. You have zero understanding of anything you're squawking about.

            >Uuuuuuuh you just don't get it
            Oh of course, how could I not differ to your expertise Dr. Softspot? My mistake

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Actual clinical moronation. You have zero understanding of anything you're squawking about.

  35. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >I want more dinosaur games but I don't want boring ugly accurate dinos

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      absolutely MAJESTIC

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >HUUUUUUUUUUUMUNGUSAUR!

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      damn, poor thing had a gay chip stuck to its back

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous
    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Whoa, new monster hunter looks swole

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Witchdoctor has the best dino skin, it looks like he is wearing the skin of a dinosaur he killed, not this scalie shit

  36. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    skill issue

  37. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Here's your dinosaur game bro

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      WHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOORE

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >feathers
      Damn, so snoot was scientific all along?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      wtf Ganker i thought you guys said snoot game was based? seems like cuckshit to me.
      >b-buh thats technically not cu-
      shut up cuckoid.

  38. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What happened to him in 2020? Is he okay?

  39. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >he still thinks ((dinosaurs)) are real

  40. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Dinosaurs never existed, you morons. Crack a bible some time, homosexuals. No dinosaurs in there at all.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      and that's why the bible is the worst setting in history

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      There was a mass extinction event where the world was flooded for 40 days. Anything that wasn't on the Ark or could survive underwater died out.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        There was a mass extinction involving prototype animals that God didn't mention because it was not important to humanity. There was a great Flood after the last ice age that he sent to punish the pre-bronze age people. You are a israelite.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Weird how there's absolutely no evidence of this flood that covered the world to the top of Mount Everest. And where did all of that water go?

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          You have lots of ice that would raise the ocean more than 40 feet if released right now.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Oh wow, a whole 40 feet. Last time I checked Mount Everest was 29,032 feet high.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Do you live on Everest?

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          antarctica and the north pole used to be lush hot jungle and is now tons and miles of ice...

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          it is allegorical
          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flood_myth

  41. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  42. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I remind you all that the so called "accuracy" is just the last flavour of dinosaurs based on nothing. Paleonthologists just need to publish papers to receive their checks.

  43. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    the problem with feathergays is they heard one small raptor species had feathers and then decided that literally every species of dinosaur must be covered head to toe in neon pastel flight feathers

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Fortunately they are a very small part of the paleocommunity.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      except i almost NEVER see anyone say that shit. oddly enough i only ever see from the other side nonstop whining about this imaginary headcanon enemy.
      you frickers are 100x more annoying and vocal than the very thing you complain about.

  44. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    He cute on the right

  45. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Reject saurischians, embrace ornithischians.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >The only dinosaur that has been proven to not look like a homosexual
      Uhhh ackshually... its not a dinosaur its an OrNiThIsChIaNs

  46. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Facts and logic don't care about your feelings

  47. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The argument is over, feathertrannies

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      what is this supposed to prove? its a dinosaur that didnt have feathers.
      literally nobody is claiming they all did.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >literally nobody is claiming they all did.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >NOOOO MY ARGUMENT ONLY WORKS IF I GENERALIZE THE ENTIRE PREMISE YOU CAN'T STOP ME NOOOOO

          More like Gaygayasaur.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          if you take the word literally so literally, then sure there are some. but they are few and they are also moronic and do not represent us.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >what is this supposed to prove? its a dinosaur that didnt have feathers.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        why did you post an image of yourself

  48. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    there is no such thing as an accurate dinosaur because dinosaurs don't exist. So they can be whatever you want them to be

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      forgot my frog image

  49. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >yet to be ruined by history revisionists
    how does he do it?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Actually, Triceratops are only a growth stage of Torosaurus and thus does not exist anymore.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        taking time from crying about t-rex to shitpost on Ganker, jack?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I thought some cuckentist decided Triceratops wasn't actually real like 15 years ago or so

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        There are papers on both sides and it's unsettled because there's insufficient fossil evidence to definitively prove or disprove the hypothesis.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      aren't they saying now, the horns where just for show to attract mates and not for attack/defense?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        someone making a moronic claim? more likely than you think
        fact is it was likely both for defense and attracting mates

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        yo do dinosaurs really got bone nutsacks

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous
    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Right...so, about that...
      "Triceratops is a baby Torosaurus" is one that a lot of people know. Less know is that we've found imprints from other ceratopsians and they had what we originally assumed were thick proto-feathers on their tails and lower backs. But they weren't necessarily Triceratops, so people weren't sure if it was all ceratopsians. Eventual though, a mummy fossil of Triceratops was found with some skin in tact and we learned a TON from that one. Generally, I think a lot of media has just avoided depicting it in the way that science is fairly sure it looked. The mummy skin had huge holes in it that were positioned and constructed the same way anchor points would be, and the thick as frick proto-feathers we found in imprints then took on a different explanation: Triceratops was very likely quilled. Also, the quills may have branched off and been weirdly feathered, but the jury is still out on that one.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You're making that up
        The onlh Ceratopsian with published evidence of quills is Psittacosaurus

  50. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >play exoprimal
    >dinosaurs are still cool
    >you get to pilot cool and sexy robots against them
    Damn shame that goty ‘23 snuck by so many people

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous
    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Games as a service shit
      Would have been just fine as a single player dino shooter but Capcom are homosexuals as usual.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        If you have gamepass I highly suggest giving it a shot, it was a refreshingly pure gameplay experience for me
        it is by no means perfect, the story-tied progression system and at times ungraceful-feeling pvp are its main flaws, but the gamepass they tacked on is beyond anemic and completely ignorable cosmetic shit

  51. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    dino crisis never ever

  52. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I'm a simple man. I like soft and fluffy things.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Yes you are gay. We get it. Ganker is bloated with gays

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Nope, not gay. Most normal people like the feeling of soft things, believe it or not. You sleep on a soft bed. You wear soft clothes. You like petting soft animals. It's normal.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Pathetic. I sleep on a rock. I wear only plate armor. The only animals I deign to touch are lizards.

  53. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    the worst thing about the feathers is that we didn't start calling them chocobos

    they are fluffy, friendly, earthbound bird mounts, lets start using the proper expression

  54. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >You're lost in a giant amazonian-like jungle
    >You hear this

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >real t-rex sounds
      someone recorded a t-rex?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It's behind you

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It's an educated guess based on their size and what we know about their vocal structure. We know that at least some of them (like the T-rex) had fairly limited vocalization and probably mostly growled and bellowed.

        Think alligators and cassowaries. Except much louder and deeper. That's what that video is trying to showcase.

  55. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >>You're lost in a giant eBayian-like farmhouse
    >>You hear this

    go ahead lizardCHUDS, just TRY tell me this isnt scary

  56. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I really hate how people are so bored that they feel the need to try and be autistic about things that stopped mattering 50 million years ago if not 5x that. Rule of cool, homosexuals.
    Things like Spino with a handful of bones and they try to recreate the most speculative shit ever to chase realism when it's literally fricking impossible.
    The gays who copy/paste feathers onto every dinosaur regardless of evidence just because they found a couple speculative ancestors to birds ranging in size equivalent to dog breeds so clearly everything had feathers including your moms butthole.

  57. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >finds eight separate tyrannosaurus rex specimens over two summers while looking for hadrosaurs
    >this pisses him off so much he goes on a decades-long crusade claiming that t. rex was nothing but a giant ugly stinky stupid cowardly scavenger

    What a b***h.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >in reality: finds some spine bones and femurs in the ground and concocts an entire mythology of giant lizards critters that existed a bajillion years ago

  58. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The idea that dinosaurs all have feathers was spread more by curious artists crazy to experiment new things by creating tyrannosaurs full of plumage when scientifically no evidence has ever been found that they had even minimally complex feathers, and as far as I know, there are fossils with preserved skin that indicate otherwise.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It's based on phylogenetic bracketing from species with fossil evidence of feathers/proto-feathers.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It was mostly raptors and their associated species that would have had feathers anyway. The herbivores definitely didn't. T-Rex is unlikely. Spinosaurus might have had fur or blubber like a seal if anything.

  59. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Tarbosaurus: superior.
    Tyrannosaurus rex: inferior.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >koreans still coping the Koreanosaurus is barely bigger than a house cat

  60. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >phylogenetic bracketing

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The idea that dinosaurs all have feathers was spread more by curious artists crazy to experiment new things by creating tyrannosaurs full of plumage when scientifically no evidence has ever been found that they had even minimally complex feathers, and as far as I know, there are fossils with preserved skin that indicate otherwise.

      FWIW its not ALL dinosaurs. It's mostly Theropods. There are ornithischians with definitive fossil evidence of no feathers due to preservation of soft body tissues. See

      The argument is over, feathertrannies

      Reject saurischians, embrace ornithischians.

  61. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    THE LIBERALS WANT TO TAKE AWAY YOUR DINOS

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      AND EAT THEM

  62. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What about The Isle?

  63. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Dinosaurs = Birds is not accurate, we humans are just as related to dinosaurs as birds are.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      based moron
      that is not true at all but you do you

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >we humans are just as related to dinosaurs as birds are.
      Just because you have a similar brain size as some dinosaurs, it doesn't mean you're related to them.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      So you're saying humans wuz dinosaurs n sheeeeeeeiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiit?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Replace birds with fish and you'd be in the ballpark.

  64. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    i dont know what it is about feathered dinosaurs that makes some people seethe and froth at the mouth but its pretty funny.
    i just think theyre neat

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Lizards with fur look cringe. Its the uncanny factor.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        That's because they aren't lizards

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          They don't look like birds.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You should look at a bird some day

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              I have a pet wieneratiel. He doesn't look like a Tyrannosaurus Rex

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous
            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              The head reminds a dinosaur because of the creast that some iconic species have like the parasaurs. Otherwise I see just a bird

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                The legs and feet don't do anything for you?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Every bird has lizard legs.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Now why do you suppose that might be?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Birds have legs

  65. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I was under the impression that big dinos like t-rex would have had just a rudimentary feathery scruff along their spine, not be covered head to toe.

  66. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    feathers are way cooler than just skin

  67. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    This thread is so fricking pointless. The only way we're ever going to know exactly what dinosaurs looked like or how they acted is to invent fricking time fricking travel and go back in fricking time to see the fricking dinosaurs. Frick.

    Not video games.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      ummm sweaty... the science™ has spoken and said that dinosaurs totally heckin existed and were all trans poc's of color

  68. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    If it walks like a duck, quaks like a duck and swims like a duck, its a spinosaurus.

  69. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Feathered dinosaurs aren't sca-ACK!

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That doesn't make them look good. Still cringe. Except now its edgy cringe, which makes it even cringier.

  70. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    what would be the evolutional usage for feathers on birds before flight?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      keeping warm

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      There are flightless birds living right now that have feathers. Feathers are not exclusively used for flight. Also billions of insects fly just fine without feathers.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >flightless birds
        now can you prove that they didn't devolve from flying birds
        >insects
        insects are so light they can fly in the wind

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >now can you prove that they didn't devolve from flying birds
          Devolve? Are you literate?
          >insects are so light they can fly in the wind
          A fricking C130 can fly in the wind. You have brain damage, please see a doctor.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Trannies mass gooning to it at this current timeline

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      see

      feathers started out as thick hairs and spines that latter linked together to more efficiently trap heat
      smaller raptors then used the hard surfaces to stabilize their movement and it was off from there.

  71. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >This fricking thread
    Has Ganker started paying people for shitposts like Twitter?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I just like Dinosaurs

  72. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous
    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO NOT THE SPINORINOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO SAVE ME JURASSIC PARK 3 MAN!

  73. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Shame they did mah homie giganotosaurus so dirty in jurassic world 3

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I'm da joka baby

  74. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Leathergays btfo lmao

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      t.

  75. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Because you are a homosexual.

  76. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Is it actually very likely they had feathers, or is it just modern day 'scientists' playing make believe like they do with everything else?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Yes some for sure had feathers. Not all of them though.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Thanks anon
        It's sad that I trust you more than the scientific community, but that's the world we live in

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      depends
      some are all but 100% confirmed to have feathers
      lots likely had some coverage
      and others are confirmed to be featherless

  77. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    dinosaurs aren't supposed to be scary or cool. They're not supposed to be anything. They're not supposed to look like lizards or birds or mammals. They're just fricking animals, and ones that have been dead for millions of years. Is this thread full of literal children?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Not a single set of words here makes sense. Please pay attention while you are in class.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      sweaty, dinosaurs were poly queer non-binary folk. Did you not pay attention in Science™ class?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They are supposed to look cool. There's no point in remembering cringe.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The moment Ganker starts to discuss anything that's slightly out of their daily shitposting it's clear nobody here knows fricking anything.

  78. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    we need a movie with Terror birds

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      If one of these things came at me why exactly can’t I just put it in headlock and choke it to death on the ground? Like if you put yourself in the right position they shouldn’t be able to kick you and they don’t even have arms so I’ve never understand why these are considered so scary

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        those things where BIG

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I could take the yellow one..maybe

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            also could be heavy

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            australia couldn't take emus, and those are smaller than the yellow one

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Then again, Australia lost to cats as well.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous
      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >why exactly can’t I just put it in headlock and choke it to death on the ground
        Becuase a wild animal that's rushing you with the intent to kill and eat you isn't going to just hold still so you can get the prefect grapple position. Terror birds weren't just kickers, they fricking bludgeoned shit to death with their beaks. You'd have your limbs snapped like wood the second you went for its neck, assuming it didn't just axe chop you in the forehead with its beak.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          bird gays btfo

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I can not wait to see a headline about you being disemboweled by a cassowary.

  79. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >you will never have a pet micro raptor

  80. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Spinosaurus was a fricking real life sea serpent and you can't convince me otherwise

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Sea serpents don't have limbs.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Because a bunch of sailors half blind with scurvy and syphilis said so?

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Serpent means snakelike.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            And Dinosaur means terrible lizard. People name shit incorrectly all the time.

  81. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I want to play a game with accurate dinosaurs if I can capture them in pokeballs

  82. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >non avian dinosaurs

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Its always the tendies behind the gay shit isn't it? I swear tendies are like the israelites of the gaming community.

  83. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous
    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Fake and gay

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Here, I'm proving birds have lizard feet. That totally proves that every single dinosaur was head to toe covered in fluffy colorful featherinas

  84. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >look chud, dinosaurs looking like bigger versions of reptiles we still see today is just Hollywood drivel!
    >they had feathers for no good reason other than uhm mating dances or some shit
    >yes I know flying dinosaurs used skin wings like bats but uhhhh... guess what sweetie, those aren't REAL dinosaurs

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      There's no such thing as flying dinosaurs moron. And not only are pterosaurs not dinosaurs, but they had feathers.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        > And not only are pterosaurs not dinosaurs, but they had feathers.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >no such thing as flying dinosaurs

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Science™ believers actually look like this and say this

  85. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >because of scientists working backwards and assuming that because a distant ancestor of the t-rex, separated by some 65 million years, had feathers the t-rex must look like a giant chicken.
    That sounds like scientists, yeah

  86. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You're braindead

  87. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Kneel

  88. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I will never understand why feathered dinosaurs make some people so upset.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >dinosaur has hipster bawd eye makeup

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It's clearly modelled after an eagle, dumb coomer.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Bidedal lizard with feathers
      Why do people find them cringe? goly gee Idk

  89. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Ugh, feathers?! Feathers are so gay and lame!
    >Please ignore that the 2nd most common animal used to denote power in heraldry is feathered

  90. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Jurassic Park already did everything you can do with dinos. Should have just been kne movie. Even the new trilogy ran out of interesting dinosaur stories to tell and made it about cloning and locusts.

  91. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous
    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Look at me mom I'm edgy! that'll teach those jurassic park chuds not to mess with my accuracyrinos again!

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        The original movie had humans killed. Was always edgy.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I look and sound exactly like this but I'm on team scales.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Vastly inferior to clever girl.

  92. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >dinosaurs are not cool anymore
    your mom is not cool anymore

  93. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Sexual molestation is a lesser evil than the mental molestation of raising children to be religious

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      you say as if they aren't complementary to begin with

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      epic false flag my dude

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        it's not a false flag when it's completely sincere and the entire opposition unironically believes this

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Your average feather accuracy gay everybody
      Pottery

  94. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  95. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Look at this little cutey

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Didn't exist

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It most certainly existed.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Feathered dinosaurs didn't exist, and neither did your sky daddy

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous
            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              That's just a bird.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Not a dinosaur

                Birds are dinosaurs

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Birds are not dinosaurs(which never existed) and men aren't women, troon.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous
              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                No they are not

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >Not a dinosaur

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Atheists BTFO.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >existed.
          >existed.
          >xisted
          >ted
          Sniff.... they are not real anymore

  96. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    THE GAYS ARE DINOSAURS!

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I said that but I look like pic related

  97. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    PLAY The Isle.

  98. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Did people who liked dinosaurs to be big, lumbering swamp beasts sperg this much about the dinosaur renaissance? It did take over 20 years for Ostrum's ideas to catch on, and basically only did so because of the popularity of jurassic park.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >to be big, lumbering swamp beasts
      Why are you talking about your mom like that?

  99. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >trannisaurs

  100. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    They were literally never cool. Even as a kid I didn't care for them.
    You already have the cooler fantasy version with wings that can look whatever way the artist feels like.

  101. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Is this a good book if I wanna read about dinos and look at dino pics?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      If you're an 8 year old in 1998 sure.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I know its not accurate anymore autist-kun

  102. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  103. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    665387821
    >veterinarians
    WHO FRICKING CARES
    You actually have to be low IQ if you can't understand why I don't care about that.
    Taxonomy. A definitive, existing amount of scientists agree that birds are reptiles.
    I don't care what your fricking four year old daughter thinks. I don't care what another, DIFFERENT group of scientists think. I don't care if a veterinarian disagrees.
    By an existing scientifically backed definition, my own, and the only one being discussed (which would necessarily DISCARD any argumentation based on physical or behavioral characteristics)
    birds
    are
    reptiles.
    You have not offered an iota of disagreement. You assert something entirely irrelevant to what I am speaking of.
    You are a moron, and don't deserve another reply.

  104. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous
    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >scaly dinos are troons

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      troony projecting

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Tranniesaurs shall not pass!
      Bottom text

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      *dies out*

  105. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    the updated version of trex is quite spooky looking.

  106. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous
    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      see

      >scaly dinos are troons

      It keeps happening

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This but the dinosaur is feathered head to toe

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It removed the feathers.

  107. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous
    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Kent looks like he enjoys diapers.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Now thats accuracy

  108. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous
    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Allo gays always come off as trans, specially carno gays.

  109. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Only autists care so much about whether dinos were scaled or feathered and all troons are autistic deviants.

  110. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    How fricking obsessed do you have to be to save a whole bunch of images of dinosaurs painted in transexual colors, then spam them as soon as people start talking about dinosaurs?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I was just thinking this. The left literally mind-broke you homosexuals.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        why do you assume its some rightoid and not another case of leftroons spamming and gaslighting again

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >gaslighting
          Nice try, leftypol, your psychobabble buzzwordisms have no power here.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >gaslighting
            NTA but it's a useful word because it perfectly encapsulates what they do all the time
            which is why you're opposed to it, I think

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Because this site is a right wing hivemind

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >hivemind
            no, that's just sane people from all walks of society uniting against your digusting ideology
            but I understand your confusion, you haven't approached reality for years now

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Yep
          >Feather trannies flood the thread
          >They think they are winning because LE numbers
          >Anons start talking sense into their moron rhetoric and calling them gay
          >One of them is now projecting

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      uhhh...huhhh...hhhh...ynbaw? i can only say like three or four things

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You wouldn't get it

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >xhe doesn't believe in trans dinosaurs
      YIKES!

  111. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    is Ganker more moronic than usual?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      2015-2020 broke so many brains.

  112. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    God will smite everyone ITT

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Allah be praised, inshallah it will be done.

  113. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous
    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      why doesn't it have a noose on its neck

  114. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  115. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I have no direct evidence of this but I believe geckos, skinks and komodo dragons also have featehrs

  116. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  117. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    wow I made a drawing of a dinosaur and said it supports trans rights, bigots btfo

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The only side effect of trannies is that they are so mindfricked its hilarious

  118. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  119. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I want Twitter to leave Ganker.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      this, Ganker is a creationist site

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You too. Out.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I concur

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Tradgays from X make fun of fedoragays when in truth they themselves are the fedoragays of the current zeitgeist.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah but we live in a new age where calling that shit out makes you cringe or something. The neo-fedoras control the cool kids club on the internet now and they will use every method and dirty trick possible to keep their dictatorship on what is based or cringe.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Check out Dexter Douglas
      Nerd computer ace
      Went surfing on the internet
      And was zapped to cyberspace

      He turned into the Freakazoid
      He's strong and super-quick
      He drives the villains crazy
      'Cause he's a lunatic

  120. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous
    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      TRIES(tobeawoman)CERATOPS

  121. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The scalecel fears the featherchad

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Whats to fear? living KFC buckets aren't scary they are delicious

  122. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Right isn't even accurate, it's more like this

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Or this
      https://www.reddit.com/r/Paleontology/comments/145vhpl/how_accurate_is_this_spinosaurus_depiction/

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >reddit

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Yeah it's reddit, frick you, you got a better dinosaur source?

  123. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >dinosaurs were trans
    >they all died out

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Top kek
      Explains why trannies are so obsessed with them

  124. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  125. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous
    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      i love that you think you're accomplishing something

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        he made me bust my gut laughing at the seething troons itt, so he definitely accomplished something

  126. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >tfw born a eukaryote but better relate with archea
    I wish I could live in a pool of simmering acid on some giant super volcano

  127. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    More or less. Dinosaurs were fascinating back when people thought they were freakish reptilian murder machines (pic related is my favorite example), they're substantially less interesting as large proto-birds.

  128. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  129. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Ediacaran > Jurassic and Cretaceous
    fight me

  130. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    then play MH

  131. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *