I stopped caring at the beginning of 2021. This is what society has collectively chosen and it's not something worth being mad over every day of your life. Posting the wojak caricature bouncing around in a noose for the 100th time isn't going to make it go away. Can we talk about something else?
Any time these leftoids call themselves the "right side of history" I get angry enough to the point where I start seeing red.
Imagine doing the following >molesting/mutilating children >being openly anti-White and voting for things that have brought unspeakable harms to White people >censoring and gentrifying the internet just for being made fun of >ruining people's lives for so much as speaking out against the evil that leftoids do >putting crossdressing sex offenders in elementary schools to ~~*read stories*~~
and somehow being so far up your own ass that you think you're the good guy. I know that it's commonplace for evil people to not see the errors of their ways, but fricking Hell.
Right side of history means that all of the fundamental myths and principles of the modern, Post-war West lead in the direction they desire. That's why they always win.
I think it's also got a lot to do with Russia Ukrain shit but I think Joe has contributed a fair bit too.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Pandemic rattles the whole world economy >China has to pause production on various goods for some time >Transport costs and container skyrocket like crazy >Because X requires Y to manufactured and Y's cost is high due to shortage, X's is also high >Tons of dependencies like that create even more shortages >Ukrain War disturbs the world economy even further >Global recession incoming
Man, I can't believe Biden made energy prices go up in Europe this whole last year! Not to mention construction materials, paper prices, electronics and more.
2 years ago
Anonymous
So that mean the left always loses? Wtf Vaushbros I thought socialism will le heckin society prosper and shit why are we overtaken by neonazis?
2 years ago
Anonymous
the left always loses to liberals, because they pick trannies and nogs over workers every time when the liberals present the choice.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Man, I can't believe Biden made energy prices go up in Europe this whole last year! Not to mention construction materials, paper prices, electronics and more.
because he and trump used the central bank to print trillions of dollars, you brainlet
"Don’t get me wrong, it’s cute that you all think you’re the heroes of this little culture war, but -- you’re not. You’re chuds; you’re on the wrong side of history, and I... am the goddamn hero."
I wouldn't even admit at gunpoint that I view the real world through the lens of Borderlands 2
Look, when I was looking for quotes from villains to the effect of >"I may be a cartoonishly evil supervillain, but YOU are the real bad guys!"
and Handsome Jack was what I found.
You misunderstand racism. Someone is racist against an entire race BECAUSE of repeated exposure to their actions. Every racist at some point has been personally wronged by a race they hate, usually much more often than their own race or other races they do not hate. Statistics show that a black male - regardless of where in the western world he ends up - is far more prone to violent crime, and low impulse control. You can notice this pattern even if you aren't looking for it. You might even have experienced it yourself but are in denial because you are taught from a young age that one race cant possibly be different from others, that color is only skin deep. Stereotypes came about for a reason: because a majority of the encounters fit the stereotype. Asians are short and meek and good at academics. Mexicans are slow workers and tend to live together in very large extended families. Whites are generally taller and much more focused on creativity. Blacks are less intelligent and more violent on average. israelites are nepotistic and force their children into family business.
2 years ago
Anonymous
the racism itself is deeply rooted and for irrational reasons, the stereotypes are used as an excuse for hatred and acts far more cruel than the stereotypes themselves
2 years ago
Anonymous
I agree, the hatred black people have towards whites is very dangerous and damaging.
2 years ago
Anonymous
epic
stereotypes wouldn't exist if they weren't the truth
i don't understand how you could possibly interpret that as me denying the existence of stereotypes
2 years ago
Anonymous
I was just stating it as a fact
2 years ago
Anonymous
as i was just stating that blacks=generally more impulsive and israelites=nepotistic isn't sufficient grounds for the opinions most of you have about them
2 years ago
Anonymous
they're both sub human so I really don't give a shit about them.
2 years ago
Anonymous
you become sub human by posting here
i don't buy the super composed morally good normalgay act from any of you
it's actually super fricking cartoonish
2 years ago
Anonymous
I'm glad that you admit that you're sub human
2 years ago
Anonymous
you're still replying?
2 years ago
Anonymous
no
2 years ago
Anonymous
good
2 years ago
Anonymous
jew
2 years ago
Anonymous
*farts*
2 years ago
Anonymous
The BLM summer of love was a really convincing reason to think you should ship all black people back to africa. It had even fellow blacks appalled at what their people are capable of. How about the riots that the beating of Reginald Denny happened at? Someone might hate the israelites for the simple reason that, whenever something he doesnt like happens to his favorite tv show, or comic book, or video game, he can search up who is responsible for it, and it's always a "berg" or "stein."
2 years ago
Anonymous
>whenever something he doesnt like happens to his favorite tv show, or comic book, or video game, he can search up who is responsible for it, and it's always a "berg" or "stein."
This doesn't happen unless you have a normalBlack person taste in media.
2 years ago
Anonymous
You mean towards everyone? I'm Latin as can and Blacks are horrible more on average to myself
2 years ago
Anonymous
Oh and other spics
2 years ago
Anonymous
stereotypes wouldn't exist if they weren't the truth
2 years ago
Anonymous
racism is a made up word Marxists use to bash their political opponent's to make them look bad.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Except the israeli race is just an excuse to defer from outside criticism. It doesn't exist any more than you can claim your genetically French.
Oh, oh no. No friend, you don't understand. We are the last ones standing, whichever side wins, wins. You? You will be the first to go, and will be long gone before we ever get to decide this. Understand that if there is one thing both the left and right agree on, is that fence sitting morons who don't care about politics get the rope first.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Good thing your little dick waving contest never leaves the computer screen. But hey two more weeks right?
2 years ago
Anonymous
You don't understand do you. Your posts are literally meaningless, it would be like trying to take math advice from a monkey. You are bloated and worthless, ignorant and content, subservient and weak. You don't pay attention to anything, you don't care about anything, and as a result you don't know anything. Nothing you say has any value.
2 years ago
Anonymous
only two more weeks!
2 years ago
Anonymous
I am glad i am not american. Enjoy dying, moronic cucks.
2 years ago
Anonymous
get off the internet. no, there will be no civil war, first of all because americans are too fat.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>headed towards a civil war
We’ve been in a civil war since gamergate moron. We’ve been in world war 3 even longer. If you haven’t noticed this by now it’s YOU who hasn’t been paying attention
2 years ago
Anonymous
Right back at you
2 years ago
Anonymous
You talk like someone with no friends who never leaves his house.The saddest thing is that you don't even realize the terrible damage the Internet has done to you. Your perception of the real world is entirely fabricated. I jnow several cases like you, all sad.
2 years ago
Anonymous
At the end of the day it'll just be are you with me or against me type of deal huh?
2 years ago
Anonymous
The left has already been operating like this for at least 7 years (in the mainstream). The right is not there yet but is fast approaching that point, and that is when conflict begins.
2 years ago
Anonymous
they need enemies to justify their existence so if you're not first on the list you're definitely next
2 years ago
Anonymous
Cope. You will seethe about politics pointlessly for the rest of your life
2 years ago
Anonymous
And you'll keep seething endlessly about a culture war you claim is fake or doesn't matter.
You guys kept saying that we shouldn’t tolerate the intolerant according to some guy’s paradox, and non-binary people are intolerant of those who don’t believe in their delusions, so yes, with your logic, it’s correct.
Total free speech is a fricking moronic position, because corporations will eventually use their disproportinate power to silence dissent, whether it's through firing dissenters and making them unemployable, kicking dissenters out of every credit processor so that they can't do basic commerce, etc...
To have true free speech, you cannot tolerate movements and ideas that seek to destroy the concept of freedom of speech, such as the LGBT movement and big capital.
People who quote Popper are inevitably either complete pseud idiots or immoral opportunists who see him as useful.
Reading contemporary views of him is fun because of unflattering people like Strauss and Voegelin thought of him as a total brainlet that couldn't understand Plato. >beneath contempt: it was the most washed-out lifeless positivism trying to whistle in the dark, linked to a complete inability to think “rationally,” although it passed itself off as “rationalism”. I cannot imagine that such a man ever wrote something that was worthwhile reading >This Popper has been for years, not exactly a stone against which one stumbles, but a troublesome pebble that I must continually nudge from the path, in that he is constantly pushed upon me by people who insist that his work on the “open society and its enemies” is one of the social science masterpieces of our times. This insistence persuaded me to read the work even though I would otherwise not have touched it. You are quite right that it is a vocational duty to make ourselves familiar with the ideas of such a work when they lie in our field; I would hold out against this duty the other vocational duty, not to write and publish such a work. In that Popper violated this elementary vocational duty and stole several hours of my lifetime, which I devoted in fulfilling my vocational duty, I feel completely justified in saying without reservation that this book is impudent, dilettantish crap. Every single sentence is a scandal, but it is still possible to lift out a few main annoyances. >Briefly and in sum: Popper’s book is a scandal without extenuating circumstances; in its intellectual attitude it is the typical product of a failed intellectual; spiritually one would have to use expressions like rascally, impertinent, loutish; in terms of technical competence, as a piece in the history of thought, it is dilettantish, and as a result is worthless.
>DAMN YOU YAMAGAMI WHY!!!?!
FTFY
Also, because a Christian sect of Korean origin with links to the LDP ruined his family.
What he did is completely indefensible and should result in capital punishment, but it's not like it was not comprehensible.
You know it may just be because I just woke up a couple of minutes ago, but: I think the point is that you don't know what genitals a non binary person has. It feels like it could be a reaction to how open and explicit and pigeonholing the modern internet has become. An attempt to reclaim some uncertainty that has been stripped away.
It could just be the term toboy being corrupted to suit left wing agendas. It could just be a phase women go through like being wiccans.
I'm all for stripping away some gender sterotypes like wearing pink. But like everything it's a slippery slope that allows for rampart degeneracy (Or as pol likes to call it grooming).
But it's not just for women, it's for men. It's slipping away from me now as I wake up more but: it's that anon's post that really got me. >what genitals do they have
Maybe some people don't want to be defined by what genitals they have. Like, I think this kind of sentiment existed before the internet, but before it was just androgyny and more to the point you could have a life where it didn't matter. The internet did have a stage where your real world factors didn't count, but then a push on the internet for 'if you're female you must X, show breasts or gtfo, etc, if you're male you must Y' has made some people feel like they need to stake out a territory where that doesn't matter.
>and more to the point you could have a life where it didn't matter
you still have a life where it doesnt matter. This shit is nothing more than attentionwhoring
Non-binary is for people who want to be part of the LGBT circle without actually committing to anything.
They don't want to do gay sex
They don't want to cut off their dicks or reshape their veganas
They simply pick a pair of pronouns and walk next to the gays and trannies while collecting the same brownie inclusion points.
Example: Ezra Miller >is clearly a guy >only has sex with women - real women >assaults men AND women >steals shit and punches people in the face >still has "their" job because Ezra Miller considers "themself" non-binary using "they/them" pronouns
As someone who has been getting manga lately, you'd be surprised how much gay manga there is both in current years and the past. You can usually tell by the cover and name of the manga without having to read its description. One had a real funny name though, wish I remembered it.
thats cool, but none of the bachelors are frickable in Wonderful Life.
now rune factory 3 has frickable husbandos. If they add gay romance for it, I'd be down
because its not forced in. People can smell disingenuous bullshit from a mile away. And it helps that they don't rape new IP in manga with this BS. Take for instance bleach coming back and kubo suddenly making ichigo realize he is a homosexual.
Make your own IPs and stuff all the homosexual and trans shit into it while censoring lewd scenes. Buy they will not. Want to know why? Because they have to rape and corrupt pre-established IPs to have any chance of selling.
Take the new Tolkien TV show for instance. With the amount of money Amazon spent on it, it would never see a ROI (return on investment) if they called it something else and had it have nothing to do with middle-earth. And made it some generic fantasy story. It would stop the b***hing about the show, but they would have a infinitely lower chance to make their money back.
I agree, LGBT pride can only go beyond if they get into the popular IP. They don't have time to spend more into creating new IP for purpose of diversity shit, the same thing happened with gay superman, marvel etc etc.
I agree, LGBT pride can only go beyond if they get into the popular IP. They don't have time to spend more into creating new IP for purpose of diversity shit, the same thing happened with gay superman, marvel etc etc.
they cannot create, only corrupt
procreation for example
this is what happens when their only connection to western audiences are woke translators saying this is what will make their games popular in the west.
Its funny how fricking moronic this board has become about garbage pol shit. Japanese people (moreso if youve been to Japan) are super homosexual in general and not scared of gay shit, much like you jerking off to futa trash.
Its a weird double standard you insecure incels have over caring about others sexual preferences. This is why you cant ever get a woman. You obsess over garbage like this
muh honor and corporate slave culture pressures nails not to stick out lest they get hammered
also japan has always just been 20 years behind the US in all things as a rule, they probably just found out gays existed when gay marriage was legalized over here
1. Not traditional because it has nothing to do with starting a family and having kids and all that. A lot of gay shit existed in feudal Japan, but it all prostitution and some gay soldiers fricking each other.
2. Medical textbooks they got from Europe in the 1800s and early 1900s said it was gross and a sign of mental illness and they took it to heart.
>gross and a sign of mental illness
Because it is. The anus is not a sex organ you weirdo. >inb4 if its not, why does it feel good
So does poking your earhole, does that make it a sex organ too? Fricking degenerates.
Generally speaking they weren't. You could frick dudes as much as you wanted as long as you still knocked your wife up.
It wasn't until gay rights activists started coming over from the west and tried to tell everyone that they don't want to make babies that there was backlash against it.
>there are morons itt that literally think that the average nips support their AIDS-spreading troon lifestyle
This is why libtards lost the culture war hard.
10 years ago America didn't support same sex marriage either. Things can change very fast. Today it's non-binary characters in Japanese video games, tomorrow it'll be transing 6 year olds in Japanese schools and imprisoning parents that object to the practice.
Cool story bro, but Japan won't even budge on immigration. You think they'll capitulate to gay pressure?
2 years ago
Anonymous
>but Japan won't even budge on immigration
Uh... they just revised immigration policies to allow for a massive increase of migrants. And this is a right wing government doing that. They're hoping to get like half million migrants in just a few years.
2 years ago
Anonymous
If you're talking about seasonal migrants in certain sectors of industry that's a nothing burger. They did the same with Filipinos in elder care back in the late 90s. Once their contract is up they give them the boot.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Cool story bro, but Japan won't even budge on immigration. You think they'll capitulate to gay pressure?
I'm not going to explain to an insane culture warrior on the internet how to assess the value of information. You can read this and maybe learn a little though. Good starting point, place to dip your toe in the water in terms of thinking critically about research and information.
Japan can open the doors all they want but 0 wage growth for 30 years will make it trash for anything except 3rd worlders.
2 years ago
Anonymous
And this is why nobody is migrating to Japan but third worlders. The majority of the migrants are Chinese, Vietnamese, Indonesian, etc. White people don't want to go there.
2 years ago
Anonymous
People from the first world seldom leave their countries.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Unless it's to another first world country, e.g. Australian migrants were predominantly educated Europeans until they opened the floodgates to the chinks.
2 years ago
Anonymous
What I'm saying is there aren't large swaths of people from a G7 country moving to another G7 minus those who do it for work. Most emigration is from the turd world to the first.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Japan has a higher minimum wage than burger land.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Dude, they literally have schools that allows teens to wear male or female uniforms. Some are even designing their uniforms to be ungendered.
2 years ago
Anonymous
So, what? It's probably more fetish fuel. It has nothing to do with LGBT politics. Gay marriage is still banned, japs being perverted is a completely different issue.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>fetish fuel
school policy that was literally met with positivity >gay marriage banned
They aren't. In asia, Japan, Taiwan (not sure about S.Korea) are a few that has decriminalize gay marriages. What cope are you going to post next?
2 years ago
Anonymous
Gay marriage was never criminalized in Japan. It's simply illegal and remains so. You didn't even bother listing if the school is public or private. Because if it's the later it's a literal nothing burger.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>They aren't. In asia, Japan, Taiwan (not sure about S.Korea) are a few that has decriminalize gay marriages. What cope are you going to post next?
Gay moron cope is the most amazing thing to behold, you morons literally think that japan have legal gay marriage when its literally an American globohomosexual base that has that(Taiwan)
2 years ago
Anonymous
homosexuals are highly looked down upon in Japan
2 years ago
Anonymous
sounds like they need to keep doing it even more and harder
2 years ago
Anonymous
>homosexuals are highly looked down upon in Japan
Japan accepts gays and lesbians more than the US homosexual.
2 years ago
Anonymous
no they don't
2 years ago
Anonymous
Yes they do, stop lying.
2 years ago
Anonymous
quit being a homosexual and making things up in your head canon
2 years ago
Anonymous
Which country is gay marriage legal again? Which country has troony athlete's and troony admirals? Which country has a whole month dedicated to gays and nigs?
2 years ago
Anonymous
They are treated as a "immma gonna rape you" joke
2 years ago
Anonymous
you can be gay married in japan it just won’t be recognized by the government
how hard is this to understand?
2 years ago
Anonymous
>you can be gay married in japan it just won’t be recognized by the government
And thus isn't worth shit, proving my point. gays can also get together in anti-LGBT Hungary and Czech, doesn't mean the government will entertain them.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Lmao at Israel >we don't hold gay marriages here, but if its elsewhere its a-ok
If that's enough for a country to "recognize" gay "marriages" then a lot more countries will be marked here.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>globohomo
Spotted the kacap. You don't need gay marriage, it's called joining the russian army.
Things didn't 'change very fast'. California voted to ban same sex marriage, the court ruled it constitutional, and then Hollywood pumped out propaganda - but nobody actually changed their opinion. It's all an illusion.
2 years ago
Anonymous
not understanding that other people have different opinions than you is a symptom of severe autism
>10 years ago America didn't support same sex marriage either. Things can change very fast.
By your logic, the troony cult is gonna get banned by the 2030s
😀 I hope it happens here soon. I personally just want them to name it differently to "Marriage". They did not have to call it that but they did to dig their heels in and be rude
I'm not going to explain to an insane culture warrior on the internet how to assess the value of information. You can read this and maybe learn a little though. Good starting point, place to dip your toe in the water in terms of thinking critically about research and information.
>translation >I have no evidence to actually support my claim but I will pretend I do as cope
still waiting for that actual proof you have Nips are opposed to LGBT in general
2 years ago
Anonymous
I didn't say that, I said what you posted functionally isn't evidence.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Don't bother, there's a reason why morons here think that an irrelevant game out of hundreds of game that came out of Japan is an enormous win for them.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Still waiting for the confirmation that said game allows same sex marriage. Has it been confirmed 100 percent? And, doomergays always do this. For example they took capcoms use of the RE engine with it's tendency to render faces in the uncanny valley as proof that Japan has conformed to the west standards. They're desperate.
2 years ago
Anonymous
m8, I actually agree with you. morons here literally thinks that some literal who games are a cultural battleground when it's just a shitty niche game made to pander to tiny faction of troontard.
2 years ago
Anonymous
It's dumb shitposters who's brains have been muddled by American politics. Every studio in Japan has their own design philosophy. Capcoms inhouse studios are different from Team Ninja which are different from sonic teams or Nintendos or Bamco. Just because one game does something doesn't indicate some new policy about LGBTQ. Infact, with respect to foreign influence in Japanese gami g most of the investment is from the middle east not America or EU these days.
If this game didn't have this it wouldn't be getting any where near this many threads and attention. Maybe they made the right move you gays are going to market it for free.
The internet is used to summon demons. You probably have one attached to you as well. Even the so called Christian has at least one succubus attached dragging him or her back to the hub to be drained of sexual love. I know not how it affects the prize in heaven or if we are all disqualified. When exactly is a tree a zombie producer? But the demonic gateway is permanently open and grows faster and wider every day. I’m not sure the elect can close it down. Try to spread the gospel as best you can, try not to coom too much without a wife, but remember there is no total victory on this side of life. This planet is doomed and if we are truly lucky the last days are also accelerating. The love of most is almost completely gone, even hedonism is more about self absorbed hatred than self love. May God’s mercy fall anew.
another day another thread with white incel chuds complaining about gays and blacks in vidya
your daddy hitler would have gassed you too for being an untermensch
another day another thread with anti-white and incelophobic troons complaining about incels of european stock existing
we're the biggest victims of modern society and you should unironically go be a troon somewhere else
"Don’t get me wrong, it’s cute that you all think you’re the heroes of this little culture war, but -- you’re not. You’re chuds; you’re on the wrong side of history, and I... am the goddamn hero."
>normies start committing violent crimes toward lgbt >media frames it as a brutal attack on innocents >more than half of your potential converts turn the other way because they don't want to be associated with psychos
good job you overreactive morons
When normies snap, no one's gonna give a frick what the media thinks.
2 years ago
Anonymous
the normies are the ones ruled by the media in the first place though
we get it, you want to delude yourself into thinking you're part of some secret badass majority that will effortlessly overthrow the government and bring about a new white christian order once you get off your fat asses, but the rest of us live in reality
2 years ago
Anonymous
How are you living in reality if you can't even tell what a man or women is?
2 years ago
Anonymous
how are you living in reality when you're too busy constantly thinking about dicks and veganas instead of just looking people in the eye and speaking to them?
2 years ago
Anonymous
Because normal people are either male or female. They don't give a damn about any of this pc garbage.
2 years ago
Anonymous
you should know by now no one likes being looked at so moot point
2 years ago
Anonymous
>the normies are the ones ruled by the media in the first place though
They're not incapable of spotting bullshit. No one's gonna think MAP's are heckin valid, no matter what spin the media puts on it. When that fails, they'll start questioning everything else.
Time and time again throughout history, people have thought they could push the masses too far because they had them under their control.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>No one's gonna think MAP's are heckin valid
good thing even the evil baby eating lgbt aren't doing it ether >"b-but i saw this twitter post that said so!"
you can find twitter posts that validate any shitty viewpoint you can think of. it doesn't mean anything.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>good thing even the evil baby eating lgbt aren't doing it ether
lol lmao this is why libtards lost the culture war hard. You can't even blend into normal society.
2 years ago
Anonymous
satanic panic 2.0
2 years ago
Anonymous
you must have meant to reply to someone else
I only pointed out the objective fact that lgbt people hate pedos just as much as everyone else
besides, didn't 'expert' opinion stop mattering when the cuckservatives all became anti-vaxxers against scientific consensus?
2 years ago
Anonymous
>I only pointed out the objective fact that lgbt people hate pedos just as much as everyone else
Then why do they hate based boomers pointing out how their camp is full of groomer and they had to call literal government agents to defend their degenerate behavior?
2 years ago
Anonymous
>they
who are they exactly? every one of the dozens upon dozens of gay and trans people I know celebrate when pedos get arrested
left and right corporations and political parties are both lead by pedos because american politics fundamentally exists more for name calling and keeping interest groups happy than actually doing anything good for the country
2 years ago
Anonymous
>every one of the dozens upon dozens of gay and trans people I know celebrate when pedos get arrested
did they also celebrate the 'dont say gay' law getting passed in florida?
no? funny that
2 years ago
Anonymous
oh, the 'dont say gay' law? you mean the law that doesn't actually hinder real groomers in any way but just prevents children from learning gay people exist?
if you actually cared about children being exposed to the concept of sexuality you'd throw b***h fits when kids movies had any kiss scenes. but no, as we all know, two men kissing is always sexual while a man and a woman kissing is always romantic
2 years ago
Anonymous
>you mean the law that doesn't actually hinder real groomers in any way but just prevents children from getting groomed by real groomers?
Yes
Your mask slipped off, gay pedo. It's not magically ok when you do it because you're the maligned good guys or whatever you tell yourselves.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>THEYRE PEDOS BECAUSE... THEY JUST ARE, OKAY!?!?!?!
we get it anon, after weeks of searching you found one research paper out of a dozen that validated your narrative and now you're convinced that every single gay wants to molest kids
if we really want to entertain your schizo narrative and go with the notion we should shut down and get rid of gays because a percentage of them are pedos, we might as well extend that logic even further >kill nonwhites because I read this thing that said they're more violent than us >kill people with red hair because they're more likely to be gay i guess i dont know >kill people taller than me because they're more physically capable of violence or something >kill everyone that isn't me because I don't trust them to be as good as me
oh sorry, I forgot the slipper slope fallacy only matters when it's something that validates you
not even gay or trans, though I'm not surprised someone so obsessed with boogeymen thinks everyone that disagrees with him must be one.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>all this seethe and cope >because the lgbtqwerty outed themselves as pedos by seething over a law meant to protect children from sexual shit
fricking LMAO
2 years ago
Anonymous
>no actual argument, just crying
so this is the intelligence of a so-called """""normie"""""
I must have wandered into a zoo on accident, because all I see if a chimp
2 years ago
Anonymous
>cant even stay on point or read reply chains proerly >Y-YOU'RE SEETHING, NOT ME!!!
The dont say gay law fricked your asses harder than monkeypox ever could, huh?
2 years ago
Anonymous
>point out gaping hole in 'we don't want the children to see anything sexualized' narrative >met with chimping and accusing everyone and everything of being a gay pedo instead of any real counterpoint
yeah, sure buddy, I'm the one that can't stay on point
2 years ago
Anonymous
>met with chimping and accusing everyone and everything of being a gay pedo instead of any real counterpoint
Im sure you can point out exactly where I did that, lmao
2 years ago
Anonymous
okay dumbass, I'll spoonfeed you since you're incapable of feeding yourself
>you mean the law that doesn't actually hinder real groomers in any way but just prevents children from getting groomed by real groomers?
Yes
Your mask slipped off, gay pedo. It's not magically ok when you do it because you're the maligned good guys or whatever you tell yourselves.
your only argument against "what's the difference between exposing kids to a gay kiss and a straight kiss" was "because gays are pedos and you are defending them so you must be a gay pedo too!"
2 years ago
Anonymous
>your only argument against "what's the difference between exposing kids to a gay kiss and a straight kiss" was "because gays are pedos and you are defending them so you must be a gay pedo too!
Except I never defended exposing children to a straight kiss either, gay pedo. All I did was point out how it's only you monkeypox carriers seething over not being able to indoctrinate children.
Fricking lmao. How angry are you that troony storytime got banned? Be honest.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Except I never defended exposing children to a straight kiss either, gay pedo.
damn, you're right, I should have been able to instantly tell that you were adamantly against all kissing scenes long before the gay revolution and that you actually genuinely care about children not being exposed to sexuality at a young age, based on your immediate jump to start pointing fingers and namecalling instead of actually making your point
your posts are not the "Gotcha"s you seem to think they are
2 years ago
Anonymous
I already made my point, gay pedo. It's why you're so mad, because you cant refute it in any way. To reiterate: >cant teach young children about sexual shit of any kind >Im not seething that I cant teach young children about heterosexual shit, I dont care >you're seething because you cant teach young children about homosexual shit
Why?
2 years ago
Anonymous
>w-why can't I force kindergarteners to learn about anal fisting and fudgepacking
Outed yourself pedo.
2 years ago
Anonymous
gays only kiss when they are doing it for an audience
2 years ago
Anonymous
You mean the same "based" boomers that want to lower the AoC and wanted to force an underage rape victim to give birth to her rape baby?
2 years ago
Anonymous
>leftard projecting their mental illness onto based right-wing chads
Typical
2 years ago
Anonymous
if i wanted to insult someone i'd call them a fricking moron like a normal person
i wouldn't start larping a corrupt medieval lord
>normies start committing violent crimes toward lgbt >media frames it as a brutal attack on innocents >more than half of your potential converts turn the other way because they don't want to be associated with psychos
good job you overreactive morons
simply do not buy the game, just download the gamecube rom and emulate ya dinguses.
it's not like this shitty company is going to turn an already mediocre game into an amazing one.
Do you even have a choice in this? Does being only good friends with the same gender means they want to bone you via dialogue and trigger their romantic cutscenes?
Fujoshit and yurishit has been a thing for a long time. Now you can expect to see westerners try to paint it as "real acceptance" instead of just fetish fuel for people with shit taste.
That's what's so funny about the moronic localisations of some of that stuff. It's pure masturbation material and localisers (who are a people lower than dirt, and have a moral obligation to keep their interference in the process of creation to an absolute minimum) try to hide as much of that shit as possible and make it seem like an acceptance thing. I love yuri, and I hate gays.
We saw that in real time in gaming. >lesbians? sure! girl-on-girl is hot! >bisexuals? okay, they're still half straight! and more girl on girl! >gays? okay! i guess it's on fair! >trannies? well shucks, it is the current year!
All over the course of 15 or so years. Lesbianism is a trojan horse.
>lesbianism is a trojan horse
wasn't it proven that trojan horse never existed and it was something an ancient writer came up with, and we simply didn't have other sources
The allure for fujoshis is impossible crack ships. If they actually come true that totally defeats the point. They don't self insert it's the delusion that's the appeal. So no this isn't for fujoshis it's for trannies.
>*correctly points out that gays have higher STDs and pedophilia rate than based heterosexual people* >-b-b-b-b-but u-u-u-u- are le gay osama bin laden onee-chan!
Pathetic
According to the American Psychological Association, children are not more likely to be molested by LGBT parents or their LGBT friends or acquaintances. Gregory Herek, a professor at the University of California, Davis, who is one of the nation's leading researchers on prejudice against sexual minorities, reviewed a series of studies and found no evidence that gay men molest children at higher rates than heterosexual men.
The Child Molestation Research & Prevention Institute notes that 90% of child molesters target children in their network of family and friends, and the majority are men married to women. Most child molesters, therefore, are not gay people lingering outside schools waiting to snatch children from the playground, as much religious-right rhetoric suggests.
>For the present discussion, the important point is that many child molesters cannot be meaningfully described as homosexuals, heterosexuals, or bisexuals (in the usual sense of those terms) because they are not really capable of a relationship with an adult man or woman. Instead of gender, their sexual attractions are based primarily on age. These individuals – who are often characterized as fixated – are attracted to children, not to men or women.
the crux of how he makes this argument. even though men rape boys insanely disproportionate to the amount of homosexuals, that doesn't mean more gay men are paedophiles because they're neither gay nor heterosexual, they're just paedophiles. absolutely compelling argument, just redefine stuff until you get the answer you want.
The Child Molestation Research & Prevention Institute notes that 90% of child molesters target children in their network of family and friends, and the majority are men married to women. Most child molesters, therefore, are not gay people lingering outside schools waiting to snatch children from the playground, as much religious-right rhetoric suggests.
>majority are men married to women.
I don't understand. Do you realise what a tiny percentage of the population homosexual men are? Of course the majority are married men you fricking moron. It's a matter of disproportionality.
2 years ago
Anonymous
No because if the number of LGBT were 50% of the population, the number who molest children would still remain the same. Your assumption is that it would increase proportionally.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Genuinely one of the most absurd conclusions I've ever seen. Anon how heavily medicated does your psych have you? I can't even figure out the leap you're making to get to what you're getting to deconstruct it. What the frick.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Your assumption that proportionality necessarily works the same with both small and large numbers based on LITERALLY ONE CHARACTER TRAIT is beyond moronic.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Stop raping kids and the number won't be disproportional.
Lol. Lmao. That same study showed over 80% of the victims were boys molested by men. That's called a gay, anon. Molesting a boy as a man means you're gay, the beard doesn't save you.
I think this is a good point - as someone with a paraphilia, while I do focus on the opposite sex when fantasizing, I'll admit that the paraphilia does take priority over orientation. Which is to say that I've found some gay shit hot because it appeals to my fetish. >if you have a jeans kink, you'll find a woman hotter if she's wearing jeans >if you have a jeans fetish/paraphilia, you'll find a pair of jeans hot whether they're being worn by women, men, or a store mannequin
Maybe? I jerk off to women 99% of the time. It's more that I'm not really interested in sex so much as I'm aroused by them fricking swelling up until they explode. Like when I'm jerking off at a picture of a hot girl I'm not fantasizing having sex with them, but them bulging and swelling until their lewd bodies explode like bombs. So that takes precedence.
>gay morons literally can't into mat and statistics because they're too mentally ill and have to rely on 1 moron """scientist""" with shoddy methods to prove their non-existent point
Like clockwork
>In research with 942 nonclinical adult participants, gay men and lesbian women reported a significantly higher rate of childhood molestation than did heterosexual men and women. Forty-six percent of the homosexual men in contrast to 7% of the heterosexual men reported homosexual molestation. Twenty-two percent of lesbian women in contrast to 1% of heterosexual women reported homosexual molestation. This research is apparently the first survey that has reported substantial homosexual molestation of girls. Suggestions for future research were offered.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/11844203_Comparative_Data_of_Childhood_and_Adolescence_Molestation_in_Heterosexual_and_Homosexual_Persons
I accept both of your moronic concession >hurr durr actually le gay are no le pedos >Actually gays have a higher pedophilia rate than starights
>hurr durr who le cares
Pathetic
2 years ago
Anonymous
Anymore drivel about the perceived notions perpetual notions about le epic troonzers, chomp
Prove my tiny bit of modicum
2 years ago
Anonymous
Prove what? That you're mentally ill? Congrats, you did that yourself
2 years ago
Anonymous
Rightoid chuds really are mentally ill. >study literally proving them wrong >UHH NO H-HE DIDN'T UHHHH DO THE METHOD ON THE STUDY PROPERLY Y-YEAH HAHA THAT'S IT
>moron drawing bad faith conclusion because he can't read study
lol
>Females were more than six times as likely as males to be >the victims of sexual assaults known to law enforcement >agencies. More specifically, 86% of all victims of sexual >assault were female. The relative proportion of female victims generally increased with age. >Sixty-nine percent of victims under age 6 were female. >compared with 73% of victims under age 12, and 82% of all juvenile (under age 18)
victims. >The female proportion of sexual assault victims reached 90% at age 13 and 95% at age 19
Most (70%) of the sexual assaults reported to law
enforcement occurred in the residence of the victim, the
offender, or the residence of another individual. Less than
two-thirds of forcible rapes (64%) occur in a residence
compared with three-quarters of other sexual assaults:
forcible sodomy (74%), sexual assault with an object (76%),
and forcible fondling (74%). Sexual assaults against
females were less likely to occur in a residence than were
those against male victims (69% versus 77%).
>Nearly all of the offenders in sexual assaults reported to law enforcement were male (96%). >Female offenders were most common in assaults against victims under age 6. >For these youngest victims, 12% of offenders were females, >compared with 6% for victims ages 6 through 12, and 3% for >victims ages 12 through 17. Overall, 6% of the offenders who sexually assaulted juveniles were female, >compared with just 1% of the female offenders who sexually assaulted adults.
So if females are the ones mostly being molested as children, and men are primarily the ones doing the molestation, so are all the men raping little girls gays or not bro?
Not that anon but this mainly suggests to me that men are most dangerous when it comes to rape of both sexes, and should ideally be kept away from children of all stripes.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Women more likely to be raped >Men more likely to do the raping >I-I-IT'S ALL SEXES
What sexuality do you think a man raping a little girl is? you think that man is gay?
2 years ago
Anonymous
What sexuality do you think a man raping a little boy is? you think that man is straight? Just because he was married to a woman during a time where gay marriages are either frowned upon or banned, doesn't mean he's not gay. Not to mention, you gays love bringing up ancient greek/rome everytime you want to highlight a time where gays are accepted. You know, times where man rapes little boys and wrote poems about it.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Hey listen, i know you're triggered I posted actual statistics but try to stay on topic and not answer question with a question me.
If the data shows a majority of females are the victims of sexual assault, and the majority of offenders are male.
What exactly does that say about the sexuality of the majority of offenders in correlation to the victims?
If you start loopin I'm just gonna ignore you.
2 years ago
Anonymous
And most offenders for sexual assault towards boys are men. What's your point?
2 years ago
Anonymous
It says you don't understand what a tiny percentage of people homosexuals are and that no one is saying that men aren't way more likely to be rapists than women, you actual tard.
2 years ago
Anonymous
I don't think they're gay explicitly, like I don't think that a pedophile is going to be attracted to adults of the same (or opposite) sex. To make my stance clear, I don't think that "all gays are pedophiles". What I think is that pedophiles will prey on children, male or female. My mother was molested by her father as a kid, and so were her brothers and sisters. Does that mean I think my grandfather was gay? No, since he clearly enjoyed sex enough to have almost a dozen kids with my grandmother. But he clearly had a thing for children, and I don't think the gender mattered.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>I don't think they're gay explicitly, like I don't think that a pedophile is going to be attracted to adults of the same (or opposite) sex.
Then you'd be wrong.
The LGBT movement has always been pederastic.
The first ones in the 20s, the grecian libertine ones, held pedophilia higher than they did adult homosex and all the documents from that time were calling for changed age of consent laws moreso than sodomy ones.
In the 60s all of the big homosexual beatniks like Ginsberg were avowed pedophiles and again were even more concerned about age of consent than they were sodomy.
All of the founding documents and big names of 'queer' theory were pedophilia proponents and not shy about it.
The Stonewall Inn, the founding myth of the LGBT movement, was a pedophile grooming hangout.
2 years ago
Anonymous
You could've added NAMBLA as well. Those Black folk were rallying for gay rights since the beginning. No one for some reason remembers them.
Considering 1.7% of men identify as gay (high estimate but I'm happy to use the high bound because it still makes gays look like pedos), and almost all rapes and sexual assaults are committed by men, so we can assume that a majority of that remainder of 12% were raped by men, why are homosexuals at least 3 times more likely to abuse kids?
Rightoid chuds really are mentally ill. >study literally proving them wrong >UHH NO H-HE DIDN'T UHHHH DO THE METHOD ON THE STUDY PROPERLY Y-YEAH HAHA THAT'S IT
>gay morons proved for the 2nd time that they can't into math and statistics
Notice that your moronic fricking study didn't even try to categorize heterosexual and homosexual. Notice that your moronic fricking study is from the late 90s while mine is more recent. Notice that your excerpt has literally nothing to do with homosexual proportions. >The present study extends the research of Tomeo, Templer, Anderson, and Kotler [1]. They found that 56% of gay men in contrast to 7% of heterosexual men, and 22% of lesbian women in contrast to 1% of heterosexual women, had reported homosexual molestation
It was also associated with a higher risk of sexual abuse in adulthood (Hughes i in., 2010). >There are a number of research reports showing a disproportionately high proportion of adult homosexuals or bisexuals (compared to the heterosexual population) who have experienced childhood sexual abuse (Brennan et al., 2007;Rothman et al., 2011;Tomeo et al., 2001). The declaration of non-heterosexuality, commonly known as coming out, in these cases may not be so much a manifestation of sexual integration as a call for help.
This is why leftard has lost the culture war hard
2 years ago
Anonymous
every developed nation in the world is trending decisively towards accepting and identifying as LGBT, this "think of the children!!!1!" panic doesn't work anymore
2 years ago
Anonymous
I accept your concession
2 years ago
Anonymous
This was done during Abe, right? Now he's dead.
2 years ago
Anonymous
That ruling was from june of this year. Abe's tenure ended in 2020.
2 years ago
Anonymous
you aren't japanese. Anti-LGBT japanese are mostly confused boomer fossils just like in America. The clock is ticking for them
2 years ago
Anonymous
2 more weeks
2 years ago
Anonymous
2014 study of the whole population, not a random selective study by some ad company found 52% disapproval of gay marriage.
2 years ago
Anonymous
and japan's population is rapidly aging. Imperial era dinosaurs are rapidly dying out, nobody gives a shit what nanking deniers think
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Nanking deniers
Frick off tankie, you'll never get Japan. Gay marriage is still illegal seethe more.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Liberal order's going to fall apart before Japan does, you were too slow.
2 years ago
Anonymous
why do people always say this?
I’ve been to japan I barely see old people walking around
2 years ago
Anonymous
Japanese people move to rural Japanese-only areas when they get old like 99% of the time. You'll never see old people walking around in the cities.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Go to a rural place. State capital cities dont count for shit with all the kids going there for job opportunities.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>muh nanking
american dumbass spotted
2 years ago
Anonymous
Betting it's a asiatic.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Nah kong-reans seethe about it ad nauseam and chinese have weird hangups that out them immediately.
If people just pretend it matters to the jps, young or old, it's definitely an american.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Right-wing Japanese people still seethe about the firebombing and nukes though which is kind of hypocritical.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Nothing hypocritical about it.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Complaining about crimes that your enemy has committed against you while mocking those who you have committed crimes against is hypocritical. I'm guessing you're one of those people who thinks Japan "dindu nuffin".
2 years ago
Anonymous
There wasn't a single country that didn't commit war crimes in WWII I don't give a single frick about war crimes committed 70+ years ago
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Japan "dindu nuffin"
Correct.
It's just atrocity propaganda that americans are propping up because they see it as a useful wedge to force them to bribe Koreans and harm Japan economically and demographically.
Just like all other atrocity propaganda we still hear about.
2 years ago
Anonymous
t. abe's ghost
2 years ago
Anonymous
americans firebombing major population centres and killing a million people in a war that was already won, A-okay. Little bit of wartime rape, apparently way overboard.
2 years ago
Anonymous
I'm sure they have more time than the homosexual troons who are going to commit suicide.
2 years ago
Anonymous
any sane person should be anti-lgbt
2 years ago
Anonymous
I don’t care what you identified as if you bother the children with such bullshit you’re getting punched.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Whats with all this fake made up pretend definitions out-of-the-blue-sky-frick all at once of sexual orientations?? It is perplexing in a very unique way to moi
2 years ago
Anonymous
no shit, leftard cancer is still spreading every day because it's being propagandize as the "morally right" thing to do
2 years ago
Anonymous
it's inevitable when the arguments their detractors rely on are the same ones that are used to justify racism, a topic an even bigger portion of the population is united against
2 years ago
Anonymous
wut?
2 years ago
Anonymous
the frick are you on about
people stopped watching the oscars because everyone realized it's just a circlejerk for the same five movies every year, not because "muh politics"
2 years ago
Anonymous
cope
2 years ago
Anonymous
correlation and causation
words that are doubtless too big for you to understand
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Notice that your moronic fricking study didn't even try to categorize heterosexual and homosexual.
What cope is this? the majority of victims are women and the majority of offenders are men?
Do you think there's no correlation between the fact a majority of victims are women and offenders men? or are you saying gay men are just raping young girls?
Such a weird moronic cope. I'll respond to this after I eat breakfast if the thread isn't nuked.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>What cope is this? the majority of victims are women and the majority of offenders are men?
That's like saying the majority of crimes are committed by whites in the US you severely moronic homosexual. DO you even understand what per capita and proportion even means? The fact that you have to cope with overall majority instead of per capita makes your argument even more flimsy than it already is.
>Pedophiles are invariably males: A report by the American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children states: "In both clinical and non-clinical samples, the vast majority of offenders are male." The book "Sexual Offending Against Children" reports that only 12 of 3,000 incarcerated pedophiles in England were women. Significant numbers of victims are males: A study of 457 male sex offenders against children in Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy found that "approximately one-third of these sexual offenders directed their sexual activity against males." Homosexuals make up less than 3 percent of the population, not "8 to 10 percent" as your article reported. A recent study in Demography estimates the number of exclusive male homosexuals in the general population at 2.5 percent and the number of exclusive lesbians at 1.4 percent. Homosexuals are overrepresented in child sex offenses: Individuals from the 1 percent to 3 percent of the population that is sexually attracted to the same sex are committing up to one-third of the sex crimes against children. A study in the Journal of Sex Research found that although heterosexuals outnumber homosexuals by a ratio of at least 20 to 1, homosexual pedophiles commit about one-third of the total number of child sex offenses.
2 years ago
Anonymous
this is assuming that pedophiles who identify as straight are homosexual
According to the American Psychological Association, children are not more likely to be molested by LGBT parents or their LGBT friends or acquaintances. Gregory Herek, a professor at the University of California, Davis, who is one of the nation's leading researchers on prejudice against sexual minorities, reviewed a series of studies and found no evidence that gay men molest children at higher rates than heterosexual men.
The Child Molestation Research & Prevention Institute notes that 90% of child molesters target children in their network of family and friends, and the majority are men married to women. Most child molesters, therefore, are not gay people lingering outside schools waiting to snatch children from the playground, as much religious-right rhetoric suggests.
2 years ago
Anonymous
And? They're still literally homosexuals and they're still overrepresented in child sexual abuse cases.
2 years ago
Anonymous
you're deliberately misreading the part where most "gay" pedophiles have straight families, but I'm sure traumatizing more children by punishment will fix something
2 years ago
Anonymous
>you're deliberately misreading the part where most "gay" pedophiles have straight families,
Are you even listening to yourself you literally moronic homosexual? >hurr durr them uncles be banging their nephew boys but dem be married to woman so that means they no gay
They are still gays and they're still disproportionately gays. Your cope does nothing to refute this.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Except it's not because a general crime statistic is also not including the victim statistic to point the correlation. Your moronicly illogical argument only works if you ignore the victim portion and draw an incredibly stupid correlation that somehow paints majority female victims and majority male victims somehow equates to higher incidence of male victims being raped by men.
Again you either concede the data cannot infer sexuality because it makes you angry, or you acknowledge that a majority of interactions in childhood sexual assault are between men and young girls.
Your per capita schizo posting literally means nothing and is such a MASSIVE deflection and goal post shift it's honestly funny.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Except it's not because a general crime statistic is also not including the victim statistic to point the correlation.
Just like your moronic study since it doesn't even categorize heterosexual and homosexual perpetrators and victim. The fact that you keep defending your moronic methodology without even bringing tons of modern studies that actually include those shit defeats your entire cope argument. Also, nice try deflecting the fact that your study is from the fricking late 90s instead of more modern shit since that makes your claim 100x more moronic than it already is. There's a reason why you won't even try to refute my original argument in that homosexuals groups commit a higher pedophile rate than heterosexual.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Loopin
So you concede that you can't infer sexuality based on the data because it makes you angry?
Also there are modern studies that show children aren't more likely to be raped by gay couples than straight couples.
Anyway stop dodging me you little b***h. What inference on sexuality do you draw from a male sexually abusing a female?
This source says that fecal matter from a straight white male can cure delusional thoughts .
>So you concede that you can't infer sexuality based on the data because it makes you angry?
So that's what this is all about? Your inability to literally find a single study that refutes the research that I've cited? Lol nice job in proving all gays are mentally ill and moronic
2 years ago
Anonymous
Goddamn you're dodging me harder than ali dodged the draft man.
>What inference on sexuality do you draw from a male sexually abusing a female?
2 years ago
Anonymous
You're dodging my original point faster than Ali's dance move
>homosexual have higher rate of child sexual abuse than heterosexual
The fact that you had to cope with some outdated studies that have been thoroughly debunked itt shows how all gays are moronic and mentally ill.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Thoroughly debunked
You posted one non-peer reviewed study, stop dodging me you homosexual, you've been doing it since the start of this chain.
>What inference on sexuality do you draw from a male sexually abusing a female?
2 years ago
Anonymous
Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network: https://www.rainn.org/statistics/children-and-teens
Girls more likely to be sexually assaulted than boys
Girls more likely to be sexually assaulted than boys
2 years ago
Anonymous
Yeah no shit genius, almost all men are straight, and almost all rapists are men.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Thank you for finally acknowledging logic.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Homosexuals rape significantly disproportionately relative to the tiny fraction of the population they represent.
2 years ago
Anonymous
now why dont we take that logic to its proer conclusion then? >almost all men are straight >almost all rapists are men. >Thus, almost all rapists are straight men
meanwhile in reality
>So you concede that you can't infer sexuality based on the data because it makes you angry?
So that's what this is all about? Your inability to literally find a single study that refutes the research that I've cited? Lol nice job in proving all gays are mentally ill and moronic
>Although heterosexuals outnumber homosexuals 20:1, homosexuals commit 1/3 of total number of
What could possibly be the reason for this disconnect?
2 years ago
Anonymous
>what is per capita
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Although heterosexuals outnumber homosexuals 20:1, homosexuals commit 1/3 of total number of
fricking lmao the memes literally write themselves >Although they're 5% of the total population, homos commit 33% of all pedophilic crimes
That's because homosexual pederasts magically cease becoming counted as homosexuals when they abuse children in any discussion with leftists and soclibs.
For example, the investigations into abuse within the Catholic church have found that 85% of all cases were by homosexual priests abusing little boys.
Even including grown homosexual men, who were into teenagers and older, who defended the pederasts.
All literature on the subject prevaricates around this and pretends their inclinations to rape little boys has nothing at all to do with their homosexuality. (much like literature on Stonewall avoids mentioning that it was a hangout for older middle-aged men to pick-up minors)
But on average little girls are more likely to be sexually assaulted by men then by women? in fact young girls are more likely to be assaulted by a male parental figure than young boys.
>But on average little girls are more likely to be sexually assaulted by men then by women?
Because homosexuals are less than 2% of the population.
Even if every single one of them was a pederast and if even less than 1% of straights were pedos the latter would still be the majority due to simple demographics numbers.
What matters when looking at communities is the rate of prevalence within the subset.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Because homosexuals are less than 2% of the population.
This is literally cope and a moronic fallacy that you can't prove.
It's like saying one big cup has 5 sponges in it and another cup has 1 sponge in it, but because you change that cups size to the bigger cup it will magically get 4 extra sponges out of nowhere.
Literally moronic nonsense claim.
The original claim was that homosexuals molest children more than heterosexuals, but most child rape victims are females and most child rape offenders are male.
So are you saying men who rape young girls are homosexuals? depending on your answer I'm gonna screencap this for later keks.
Considering 1.7% of men identify as gay (high estimate but I'm happy to use the high bound because it still makes gays look like pedos), and almost all rapes and sexual assaults are committed by men, so we can assume that a majority of that remainder of 12% were raped by men, why are homosexuals at least 3 times more likely to abuse kids?
This is just completely wrong and also goal post shifting, unless you concede that a man raping a little girl only counts as a gay when he chooses to identify as a gay.
Again the original claim was that gay men on average commit more sexual assault than heterosexual men, yet females are overwhelming sexual assault victims, and men are overwhelmingly sexual assault offenders.
So if the majority of sexual assault interactions are from men to women, how do you classify that? what do you call a man who wants to have sex with a female?
Do you call him gay?
2 years ago
Anonymous
>This is literally cope and a moronic fallacy that you can't prove.
Verifiably the case since ages back. Homosexuals are not, and will never be, a large part of the population. >The original claim was that homosexuals molest children more than heterosexuals
Nope.
I went up the chain of quotes and looked just to be certain. The exact claim was that, quote: >"that gays have higher STDs and pedophilia rate than based heterosexual people
Higher RATE.
Not only are you dishonest but an illiterate to boot.
2 years ago
Anonymous
every single gay person was molested as a child or had some sort of traumatic sexual experience when they were underage
2 years ago
Anonymous
>This is literally cope and a moronic fallacy that you can't prove.
Verifiably the case since ages back. Homosexuals are not, and will never be, a large part of the population. >The original claim was that homosexuals molest children more than heterosexuals
Nope.
I went up the chain of quotes and looked just to be certain. The exact claim was that, quote: >"that gays have higher STDs and pedophilia rate than based heterosexual people
Higher RATE.
Not only are you dishonest but an illiterate to boot.
>Because homosexuals are less than 2% of the population.
This is literally cope and a moronic fallacy that you can't prove.
It's like saying one big cup has 5 sponges in it and another cup has 1 sponge in it, but because you change that cups size to the bigger cup it will magically get 4 extra sponges out of nowhere.
Literally moronic nonsense claim.
The original claim was that homosexuals molest children more than heterosexuals, but most child rape victims are females and most child rape offenders are male.
So are you saying men who rape young girls are homosexuals? depending on your answer I'm gonna screencap this for later keks.
[...]
This is just completely wrong and also goal post shifting, unless you concede that a man raping a little girl only counts as a gay when he chooses to identify as a gay.
Again the original claim was that gay men on average commit more sexual assault than heterosexual men, yet females are overwhelming sexual assault victims, and men are overwhelmingly sexual assault offenders.
So if the majority of sexual assault interactions are from men to women, how do you classify that? what do you call a man who wants to have sex with a female?
Do you call him gay?
>But on average little girls are more likely to be sexually assaulted by men then by women?
Because homosexuals are less than 2% of the population.
Even if every single one of them was a pederast and if even less than 1% of straights were pedos the latter would still be the majority due to simple demographics numbers.
What matters when looking at communities is the rate of prevalence within the subset.
That's because homosexual pederasts magically cease becoming counted as homosexuals when they abuse children in any discussion with leftists and soclibs.
For example, the investigations into abuse within the Catholic church have found that 85% of all cases were by homosexual priests abusing little boys.
Even including grown homosexual men, who were into teenagers and older, who defended the pederasts.
All literature on the subject prevaricates around this and pretends their inclinations to rape little boys has nothing at all to do with their homosexuality. (much like literature on Stonewall avoids mentioning that it was a hangout for older middle-aged men to pick-up minors)
The really fricked up thing is how okay gays are with the child molestation in their "community". Like you don't generally get whistle blowers and even the most 'normie' gay will generally step in to defend 'the community' versus the welfare of children.
Worse are the ones who see it as an intrinsic part of the culture.
2 years ago
Anonymous
I didn't bring it up because I wanted to reread it to make sure I hadn't missed it but it's really interesting that the study you posted decided not to include a table showing the gender of victims and the gender of offenders, when every other combination was included. I don't think you understand the extent to which this is disproportionate is insane. Not interested in getting involved in a what gay means word-game. You want me to broaden it to include bisexuals? Fine, it's still insanely disproportionate. You're doing some mighty fine somersaults here to avoid the central issue, but it's all you can do.
gays are an endless source of laughs. I still think of the video where this wrinkly old gay says "the fisting guys tend to congregate in this area over here" and laugh aloud sometimes.
I'm actually convinced this pozzed shit is just something Marvelous USA has always done. Like for example in Magical Melody the ability to marry your farming rival (Male and female route so do the math) was added in the localization.
Thr funny thing is i always wanted free-marriage for gameplay convenience, but if it's done in this moronic sjw politics way i'd rather not have it at all.
Besides most of BM ripoff games had shota protags and all shota r twinks anyway so i didnt care much.
And the funny thing is the target audience for these is kids so it'll always be shota x e-girl marriages every game no matter now many anlgosphere trash twitter trolls seeeeeethee.
>all eligible marriage candidates available for romance regardless of that choice, you can truly be who you want to be
Fat ugly bastard x e-girl confirmed.
have a nice day you moronic revisionist. I've got shit from my 2012 folder that would make half the people you hang out with on discord kill themselves.
Wasn't it the same in the last one?
Regardless, the "every character is bi" shit is what really gets on my nerves. Not only does it completely devalue every character, but now you gotta deal with all of the male characters being gay for you.
this
dragon age is one of the only series I can think of that has characters actually having preferences
I guess it’s just easier for dialogue to make everything the same but it’s so lazy I don’t know why more games don’t actually put effort into it if they’re going to do something like this
Mass Effect and Cyberpunk as well
I think the reason it's lazy in these games is because the devs don't actually have interest in the gay shit and are just adding it to appease the west
this
dragon age is one of the only series I can think of that has characters actually having preferences
I guess it’s just easier for dialogue to make everything the same but it’s so lazy I don’t know why more games don’t actually put effort into it if they’re going to do something like this
>try to become bros with male character >suddenly gay shit
I hate it.
so if gays are factually more likely to be pedophiles, and incels are factually more likely to kill and rape women, shouldn't we just get rid of both of them?
So, you feel misrepresented or what? Angry because nobody's fricking you in the ass, anon? Surely if got out more people would know how much of a submissive little bawd you are and willing to push your shit in.
I can smell your projection cumming out of your butthole from a mile away, gay.
So, you feel misrepresented or what? Angry because nobody's fricking you in the ass, anon? Surely if got out more people would know how much of a submissive little bawd you are and willing to push your shit in.
>Anyone can marry anyone
No issues, doesn't affect gameplay >can play as a "non-binary"
Literally makes zero sense, "non-binary" is a schizo mentality, not a sex. Your physical body is male or female in 99% of cases. If someone wants to make a character as androgynous as possible then thats fine but actively catering to crazies should not be encouraged.
As you can imagine the plebbit homosexuals are frothing with joy over it.
https://www.reddit.com/r/storyofseasons/comments/xdambh/sos_a_wonderful_life_will_feature_same_sex/
>sexual orientation and its related attractions and desires are inherent, and forcing people to hide or repress their sexuality, or worse, convert their sexuality, is harmful wrong >people should be allowed to express their sexuality as they like as long as no one is harmed >therefore, all sexualities are valid
I see gays and gay enablers push this argument all the time, but as soon as pedophilia comes up, suddenly the BLT community adopt their opponents' rhetoric of death, conversion and imprisonment to those with a wrong sexuality. So gays, which is it? Is sexual orientation inherent and valid, or is it dangerous and degenerate?
should be allowed to express their sexuality as they like as long as no one is harmed
pedophilia harms kids so it breaks this rule
you're surely moronic if you can't figure that out
your argument would be sound if your definition of forcing transgenderism amounted to anything less broad than "letting children do anything outside of their typical gendered activities (but not tomboys I find them hot)" feel free to correct me if I'm jumping the gun, but my experience with your kind on this board has never illuminated any other way of thinking
outside of the smallest corners of twitter, no one is actually calling for any sort of forced transitioning
my definition of forced transgenderism would be giving 6 year olds hormone blockers and chemically castrating them before they even know what penis is, then making them stripdance for good boy points
But that's just me. do feel free to point out the difference between parents castrating their son with a heated probe then putting him in a dress and parents castrating their son with blockers and putting him in a dress, Im all ears
forcing transgenderism is using puberty blockers when the desistance rate for dysphoria before puberty is 85%, and there is literally no research on the effect of puberty blockers on that rate.
> the desistance rate for dysphoria before puberty is 85%
The study that statisic came from is literally >letting children do anything outside of their typical gendered activities is troonygenderism
2 years ago
Anonymous
Your attempts at bad faith are so incompetent it's actually funny >letting children do anything outside of their typical gendered activities is troonygenderism
notice how there's no "forced" here? Almost as if the actual "forcing" is putting a kid on blockers because he played with a barbie doll one time
Wanna try again?
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Almost as if the actual "forcing" is putting a kid on blockers because he played with a barbie doll one time
but that's what the study wanted to do, playing with a barbie was enough to classify you as a troony even if you said you didn't want to be a girl, and then 10 years later when you still didnt want to be a girl you were counted as a desister
2 years ago
Anonymous
[...]
2 years ago
Anonymous
Desistance is a such a horrible concept. It validates the cult like mentality these people have.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Enjoy your monkeypox
Enjoy your thirst for wiener in silence, homo.
[...]
2 years ago
Anonymous
And? It works. It's a mental illness with a ridiculously high suicide rate, and the desistance rate post puberty is extremely low (not to say that dysphoria can't be significantly lessened, but it very, very rarely goes away entirely). Be careful anon, you're getting very, very close to saying the quiet part loud.
2 years ago
Anonymous
citing transgender suicide rate as a point against transgender people is kind of funny to me >transgender person commits suicide >suicide gets used as evidence that transgenderism is bad and causes more rallying against transgender people >more transgender people commit suicide because of the increased stress, isolation, etc.
it feels like it just creates a feedback loop where it becomes impossible to tell how much of the suicide rate is the condition and how much is the resulting fallout from being in an incredibly vilified minority
racial minorities at least have eachother to lean on, but due to not being an inherited state transgender people don't really have that distinction
2 years ago
Anonymous
No it doesn't, what you're talking about is one of the few things about gender dysphoria that's actually well-studied. It has an impact, but for example divorce is a better predictor for suicide among trans people than reports of bullying or non-acceptance.
>My non-peer reviewed study with like 100 random people is ok >But not this peer reviewed one with a bigger sample size
Okay, I'm reaching out across the culture war here, 1914 Christmas day football match style. Use sci-hub mate. Although it has almost everything, it doesn't have what you're citing. Thread's dying soon, I'm getting bored. The smaller the numbers you're dealing with, the larger n needs to be. The 85% number might be 50%, it might be 95%, but the thrust of the point doesn't change. desistance happens a lot before puberty, almost never happens after.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>I'm reaching out across the culture war here
I'm good man, thanks though. Hope you have a nice day soon.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Those who hate you don't win unless you hate them, and then you destroy yourself.
It's just fun to chat about shit anon, and I said culture war ironically. I'm a software dev so I probably know way more trans people personally than you. Threads winding down so I wish you all the best in health, love and happiness. Everyone on this site is a fellow traveller, and I love them dearly.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>society is at the plateau of trans acceptance, ostensibly the most tolerance they will ever enjoy in human history >troony suicide rate is at an all time high
you didn't think that one through, bro
Are all gays rapists? Does jerking off to drawn gay pornography or internal gay fantasies make you a gay rapist? No, and likewise, being attracted to children doesn't make you a child rapist. You can have urges and choose not to act on them, a concept with which I know some aren't familiar. And pedophilia would be considered a sexuality if it was accepted by society. It's not a matter of objectivity, but societal standards.
the only reason that's the case is because kids are being told that sex are bad. If society normalizes pedophilia then those pedos wouldn't have to resort to force themselves to kids and kids don't have to get traumatized that they had sex with older people. You know I'm right and you can't deny it.
of course, that's why molestation-induced DID develops before the age of 10, an age long before children even know any information about sex, not because having a parental figure use you like a fricktoy is harmful to a barely developed brain, but because kids are taught sex is bad!
>an age long before children even know any information about sex
that's the point you moron, those kids didn't understand what happened to them. 10 is old enough to have awareness
globo homosexual is a shortening of global homogenisation but it's funny that the shit we're dealing with is so fricking homosexual that when people hear it they just think that it means imperialist liberalism pushing gays all over the world. It kind of is anon, it kind of is.
Alot of it is Karens who still believe that sex before marriage is a taboo, while forgetting that Teens are perpetually horny. But there's alot of genuinely fricked up human beings out there that it's easier to just ban underaged sex until you know 100% someone is mature enough. And even then the age of consent is all over the place.
Eh, bachelorettes are still going to interact with a male mc and bachelors with a female mc no matter how many layers of paint you cover it. The love events were designed with a heterosexual couple in mind after all, the creators are just putting a mask over it so the muh representationtards can gobble over it
Are children at risk for sexual abuse by homosexuals?
Results: Abuse was ruled out in 35 cases. Seventy-four children were allegedly abused by other children and teenagers less than 18 years old. In 9 cases, an offender could not be identified. In the remaining 269 cases, two offenders were identified as being gay or lesbian. In 82% of cases (222/269), the alleged offender was a heterosexual partner of a close relative of the child. Using the data from our study, the 95% confidence limits, of the risk children would identify recognizably homosexual adults as the potential abuser, are from 0% to 3.1%. These limits are within current estimates of the prevalence of homosexuality in the general community.
Conclusions: The children in the group studied were unlikely to have been molested by identifiably gay or lesbian people.
n way too small for the question at hand, completely pointless. also your habit of quoting stuff then not posting the source with it is cancerous as frick.
citing transgender suicide rate as a point against transgender people is kind of funny to me >transgender person commits suicide >suicide gets used as evidence that transgenderism is bad and causes more rallying against transgender people >more transgender people commit suicide because of the increased stress, isolation, etc.
it feels like it just creates a feedback loop where it becomes impossible to tell how much of the suicide rate is the condition and how much is the resulting fallout from being in an incredibly vilified minority
racial minorities at least have eachother to lean on, but due to not being an inherited state transgender people don't really have that distinction
>35 cases >literally ignores the studies that have significantly more samples because he can't cope getting btfo
lmao see
[...] >gay morons literally can't into mat and statistics because they're too mentally ill and have to rely on 1 moron """scientist""" with shoddy methods to prove their non-existent point
Like clockwork
>In research with 942 nonclinical adult participants, gay men and lesbian women reported a significantly higher rate of childhood molestation than did heterosexual men and women. Forty-six percent of the homosexual men in contrast to 7% of the heterosexual men reported homosexual molestation. Twenty-two percent of lesbian women in contrast to 1% of heterosexual women reported homosexual molestation. This research is apparently the first survey that has reported substantial homosexual molestation of girls. Suggestions for future research were offered.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/11844203_Comparative_Data_of_Childhood_and_Adolescence_Molestation_in_Heterosexual_and_Homosexual_Persons
To date, the consensus in the social science literature is clear: in the United States, children living with two same-sex parents fare, as well as children residing with two different-sex parents. Numerous credible and methodologically sound social science studies, including many drawing on nationally representative data, form the basis of this consensus. These studies reveal that children raised in same-sex parent families fare just, as well as children raised in different-sex parent families across a wide spectrum of child well-being measures: academic performance, cognitive development, social development, psychological health, early sexual activity, and substance abuse.
n way too small for the question at hand, completely pointless. also your habit of quoting stuff then not posting the source with it is cancerous as frick.
LISTEN UP HULKAMANIACS! YOU SHOULD BE PROUD OF YOURSELF AND WHO YOU ARE BROTHER! PROUD TO BE AN AMERICAN AND PROUD THAT YOU AREN'T A homosexual DUDE!
TRANNIES ARE 4X MORE LIKELY TO HAVE AIDS DUDE > http://www.nbcnews.com/id/40279043/ns/health-health_care/
homosexualS, WHO ARE 1.65% OF THE US POPULATION ACCOUNT FOR 63% OF THE SYPHILIS CASES DUDE! > http://takimag.com/article/the_straight_dope_on_homosexuality_elizabeth_mccaw/print
homosexualS ARE 17X MORE LIKELY TO GET ANAL CANCER THAN STRAIGHTS BRAH > http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/12/the_gay_agenda_and_the_real_world.html
homosexualS ARE 60X MORE LIKEY TO HAVE AIDS THAN NON-homosexualS BROTHER > http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3462414/
46% OF HOMOS REPORT BEING MOLESTED, COMPARED TO ONLY 7% OF STRAIGHT HULKAMANIACS > http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11501300
41% OF TRANNIES HAVE TRIED AND FAILED TO COMMIT SUICIDE DUDE, AND THATS A SHOOT BROTHER > http://www.nbcnews.com/id/40279043/ns/health-health_care/
65% OF TRANNIES HAVE THOUGHT ABOUT KILLING THEMSELVES IN THE LAST YEAR BRAH > http://saravyc.sites.olt.ubc.ca/files/2015/05/SARAVYC_Trans-Youth-Health-Report_EN_Final_Print.pdf#page=44
GAYS ARE MORE LIKELY THAN STRAIGHTS TO HAVE MENTAL ILLNESS BROTHER > http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2072932/
LOOK OUT BRITISH HULKAMANIACS! 1 IN 8 homosexualS IN LONDON HAS HIV > http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2014/11/18/13-of-gay-and-bisexual-men-in-london-living-with-hiv/
homosexualS ARE 200 TIMES MORE LIKELY TO BE DIAGNOSED WITH HIV TOO DUDE! > http://takimag.com/article/the_straight_dope_on_homosexuality_elizabeth_mccaw/print
27% OF TRANNIES HAVE AIDS, ONLY 12% REPORT IT DUDE > http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/group/gender/transgender/
MALE TO FEMALE TRANNIES ARE 50 TIMES MORE LIKELY THAN NORMAL PEOPLE TO HAVE HIV BRAH > http://news.yahoo.com/one-group-people-acquiring-hiv-204557712.html
SO THE NEXT TIME SOMEONE TELLS YOU TO BE TOLERANT OF QUEERS, THAT homosexual PROBABLY HAS AIDS DUDE.
-HH
only read the first one but throwing a few small-sample cross-section studies whose results you like together in order to form a narrative and not making reference to the greater argument you're part of is genuinely a fricking joke.
just read the second study, it's literally just some random academic's conjecture and has nothing to do with the data
>Post comprehensive study with multiple references and contributors >DAS JEEEEEEWWWSSS
God you people are so fricking embarrassing.
>Those who hate you don't win unless you hate them, and then you destroy yourself.
It's just fun to chat about shit anon, and I said culture war ironically. I'm a software dev so I probably know way more trans people personally than you. Threads winding down so I wish you all the best in health, love and happiness. Everyone on this site is a fellow traveller, and I love them dearly.
Since we've devolved to the schizo posting phase of your mental degradation.
You mind if I just start postin' porn?
2 years ago
Anonymous
that depends on your taste
2 years ago
Anonymous
2 years ago
Anonymous
no thanks
you got something not gay?
2 years ago
Anonymous
Lemme check my vidya butts folder
I got'chu.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>gay and nonce
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Doesn't like etna
What're you gay?
2 years ago
Anonymous
It wasn't him, it was me, I'm sorry for confusing you. But yeah go ahead, at least keep the feminine dicks subtle please.
it's nowhere near as common as in the past but stereotypical gender roles are absolutely still pushed around, albeit primarily by boomers and not really younger generations
Because they're true. They apply to the majority of people. I have never, in my entire life seen someone say a girl couldn't play sport. Ever. And I grew up playing every sport there is, over two decades ago. You have to make mountains out of molehills to make the argument you're trying to make.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>I have never, in my entire life seen someone say a girl couldn't play sport.
might be because I live in a more rural southern area, but I have definitely seen it before. also worked in jobs with women where the managers would only assign physical jobs to men, and classes of boys and girls having split activities from more outdoorsy things vs arts and crafts. even had older family members scoff whenever any men dressed feminine at all.
almost every single one of these examples was from someone well over the age of 40, but my point is that these still occur
2 years ago
Anonymous
>managers would only assign physical jobs to men.
Come on. Be reasonable. 80 year old men have stronger average grip strength than 20 year old women. That's just common sense.
To this day i still don't know what "non binary" means. I've had it explained several times, and I still don't get it. "You don't feel male or female" does anyone really? Unless you're Arnie or some shit men aren't going around 24/7 affirming to themselves yep i'm still feeling manly and male. I doubt anyone "feels" a gender. Why you gotta turn that into a mental illness?
the term non-binary technically only exists because of the way society assigned traits and expectations to the two binary genders. frankly, if the notion of masculine/feminine objects and actions was dropped the niche that non-binary-ism provides would fade with it, but given how that is absolutely never going to happen I don't really see the issue with letting them do what they feel like. it's not like it requires a whole transitioning process the way it does for transgender people
>I don't really see the issue with letting them do what they feel like.
yea that usually works out well to let a bunch of mentally ill attention seekers to have their way
because being stuck with the explicit title of woman or man still sticks you with the expectations and pressures of said titles, like men being expected to do physical shit and women being homebodies
leaving ambiguity gives a flexibility they don't really have when they're completely sticking to their gender, and that is more of a comfort to the people that subscribe to it
what century are you living in? did you just step out of a time machine? It sounds like all this relies on getting mad about normal people using pattern recognition and the kind of blank slate thinking that was disproven in the 60's but is somehow still prevalent in the social sciences.
it's nowhere near as common as in the past but stereotypical gender roles are absolutely still pushed around, albeit primarily by boomers and not really younger generations
Doesn't society traditionally shit on those people, though? I get why people would want to forge a separate identity if identifying as female means people are going to expect and try to make you act feminine and vice versa.
David Bowie got shit on? Everyone who participated in the sexual revolution is dead, the people getting high and shagging everything that moved at woodstock are almost entirely dead. You just sound like you're living in the past.
I mean, David Bowie is like one guy, and was super popular and famous - that's like the definition of an outlier. Did David Bowie mean that a regular man could be fae and feminine without getting scorn from his peers? Because I'm only in my 30s but I still remember how one of the kids in secondary school got shat on and bullied all the time for acting even slightly effeminate.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>fae
stop appropriating my culture and making it gay, thanks. couldn't even bear to read the rest of your post.
2 years ago
Anonymous
If you're not the person I was arguing with, I don't care. If you are, then I feel like you're deflecting a lack of argument on your side by picking on a single word.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Bro if I don't defend the leanan sí they're going to come for me, there's a fairy ring literally right outside my house. They're telling me they're not gay, and that the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow is literally a pot of gold, and not nikocado's gaping arsehole.
2 years ago
Anonymous
kek
Still doesn't reply to my point though. I don't think Bowie's success means that regular men can act un-masculine without inviting scorn or pushback from other men (or women as well). On that basis it makes sense that people who don't feel drawn to either set of sensibilities would want to make a 'grey area' for themselves to inhabit.
100% of right wingers are motivated by hatred and bitterness at people who aren't afraid to be themselves because right wingers know their true selves are fricking loser incels who everyone reviles.
And Hitler died crying like a b***h committing suicide as the Nazi regime collapsed around him and Communists paraded the heads of dead SS Nazis through the streets of Berlin.
Franco died peacefully at 82 years old. The communists of Spain did not.
is implying that the communists were better off than Franco?
2 years ago
Anonymous
They all had their one day as a lion as far as I'm concerned. I'm glad China became right wing without any violence though. 20th century had enough blood at that point.
why is this thread in particular being raided by a seething troony discord
are they still crying and pissing themselves over being btfo in the oney e-celeb thread?
Reminder this guy is straight, republican and had a daughter just so he could rape her.
He also lobbied with his mom, who is republican, to lower the age of consent.
Why bother with this lame ass weak Harvest Moon? Rival events will never coming back no matter what, not saying Stardew Valley any better but why bother with HM in 2022? I rather play the original ver.
>get massive harvest moon vibes from OP >look it up >its a remake of harvest moon: a wonderful life?
Huh, that explains all the related posts ive been seeing. the game was a big part of my life back in 3rd grade.
I know you guys are super upset about this but it's been posted over 3 times already
to little, we need more gatekeeping
discussing it, even with this tone, is literally the opposite of that. you're like a troon that can't stop pointing out how "bad" stonetoss is.
>he thinks posting on 4chin is going to gatekeep
My sides. What other bide time stories were you told about posting here
Uh, hello? We've already spoken about thing on three separate occasions. Isn't it time we talked about something else?
Now, about that Zelda
Guess I'll be stuck playing games made within the last 5-20 years plus a few indies
You weren't already doing that? frick off, pozz.
>not doing that already
frick I've been dosing that
new games are so shit
I don’t care. This doesn’t matter. None of this matters.
massive cope
tpbp
I'm going to bed while you guys prolapse some more
I stopped caring at the beginning of 2021. This is what society has collectively chosen and it's not something worth being mad over every day of your life. Posting the wojak caricature bouncing around in a noose for the 100th time isn't going to make it go away. Can we talk about something else?
>This is what society has collectively chosen
It's a small minority, they just happen to be on the "right side of history".
Any time these leftoids call themselves the "right side of history" I get angry enough to the point where I start seeing red.
Imagine doing the following
>molesting/mutilating children
>being openly anti-White and voting for things that have brought unspeakable harms to White people
>censoring and gentrifying the internet just for being made fun of
>ruining people's lives for so much as speaking out against the evil that leftoids do
>putting crossdressing sex offenders in elementary schools to ~~*read stories*~~
and somehow being so far up your own ass that you think you're the good guy. I know that it's commonplace for evil people to not see the errors of their ways, but fricking Hell.
Genuine Handsome Jack energy.
Right side of history means that all of the fundamental myths and principles of the modern, Post-war West lead in the direction they desire. That's why they always win.
>That's why they always win.
lol lmao
I think it's also got a lot to do with Russia Ukrain shit but I think Joe has contributed a fair bit too.
>Pandemic rattles the whole world economy
>China has to pause production on various goods for some time
>Transport costs and container skyrocket like crazy
>Because X requires Y to manufactured and Y's cost is high due to shortage, X's is also high
>Tons of dependencies like that create even more shortages
>Ukrain War disturbs the world economy even further
>Global recession incoming
Man, I can't believe Biden made energy prices go up in Europe this whole last year! Not to mention construction materials, paper prices, electronics and more.
So that mean the left always loses? Wtf Vaushbros I thought socialism will le heckin society prosper and shit why are we overtaken by neonazis?
the left always loses to liberals, because they pick trannies and nogs over workers every time when the liberals present the choice.
>Man, I can't believe Biden made energy prices go up in Europe this whole last year! Not to mention construction materials, paper prices, electronics and more.
because he and trump used the central bank to print trillions of dollars, you brainlet
I wouldn't even admit at gunpoint that I view the real world through the lens of Borderlands 2
Look, when I was looking for quotes from villains to the effect of
>"I may be a cartoonishly evil supervillain, but YOU are the real bad guys!"
and Handsome Jack was what I found.
Mate, you people would openly hate someone for their birth, not for their actions. That literally makes you evil.
You misunderstand racism. Someone is racist against an entire race BECAUSE of repeated exposure to their actions. Every racist at some point has been personally wronged by a race they hate, usually much more often than their own race or other races they do not hate. Statistics show that a black male - regardless of where in the western world he ends up - is far more prone to violent crime, and low impulse control. You can notice this pattern even if you aren't looking for it. You might even have experienced it yourself but are in denial because you are taught from a young age that one race cant possibly be different from others, that color is only skin deep. Stereotypes came about for a reason: because a majority of the encounters fit the stereotype. Asians are short and meek and good at academics. Mexicans are slow workers and tend to live together in very large extended families. Whites are generally taller and much more focused on creativity. Blacks are less intelligent and more violent on average. israelites are nepotistic and force their children into family business.
the racism itself is deeply rooted and for irrational reasons, the stereotypes are used as an excuse for hatred and acts far more cruel than the stereotypes themselves
I agree, the hatred black people have towards whites is very dangerous and damaging.
epic
i don't understand how you could possibly interpret that as me denying the existence of stereotypes
I was just stating it as a fact
as i was just stating that blacks=generally more impulsive and israelites=nepotistic isn't sufficient grounds for the opinions most of you have about them
they're both sub human so I really don't give a shit about them.
you become sub human by posting here
i don't buy the super composed morally good normalgay act from any of you
it's actually super fricking cartoonish
I'm glad that you admit that you're sub human
you're still replying?
no
good
jew
*farts*
The BLM summer of love was a really convincing reason to think you should ship all black people back to africa. It had even fellow blacks appalled at what their people are capable of. How about the riots that the beating of Reginald Denny happened at? Someone might hate the israelites for the simple reason that, whenever something he doesnt like happens to his favorite tv show, or comic book, or video game, he can search up who is responsible for it, and it's always a "berg" or "stein."
>whenever something he doesnt like happens to his favorite tv show, or comic book, or video game, he can search up who is responsible for it, and it's always a "berg" or "stein."
This doesn't happen unless you have a normalBlack person taste in media.
You mean towards everyone? I'm Latin as can and Blacks are horrible more on average to myself
Oh and other spics
stereotypes wouldn't exist if they weren't the truth
racism is a made up word Marxists use to bash their political opponent's to make them look bad.
Except the israeli race is just an excuse to defer from outside criticism. It doesn't exist any more than you can claim your genetically French.
Judaism is a faith and it always was.
You mean the National Socialists and Hitler who becomes more of a prophet day by day?
What an extraordinarily cucked philosophy. You must let everyone you know walk all over you.
why do you spend so much time on twitter
keep crying, we've got a drought
Good thing that Japanese politician got elected recently who wants to outlaw all of this shit in Japan
>Censorship is based
>it's censorship to put the mentally ill in a asylum
wat?
When it hurts leftists, yes.
Private country, don't like it make your own
totalitarianism is good as long as it's pointed at people I don't like
this unironically
You? Kill
Me? win
I don't care if you use nazism or communism to do it. Don't even try to reply because leftoids have already been playing this game for years.
with any luck you'll both be kill sooner rather than later so we can finally leave the clown world
Oh, oh no. No friend, you don't understand. We are the last ones standing, whichever side wins, wins. You? You will be the first to go, and will be long gone before we ever get to decide this. Understand that if there is one thing both the left and right agree on, is that fence sitting morons who don't care about politics get the rope first.
Good thing your little dick waving contest never leaves the computer screen. But hey two more weeks right?
You don't understand do you. Your posts are literally meaningless, it would be like trying to take math advice from a monkey. You are bloated and worthless, ignorant and content, subservient and weak. You don't pay attention to anything, you don't care about anything, and as a result you don't know anything. Nothing you say has any value.
only two more weeks!
I am glad i am not american. Enjoy dying, moronic cucks.
get off the internet. no, there will be no civil war, first of all because americans are too fat.
>headed towards a civil war
We’ve been in a civil war since gamergate moron. We’ve been in world war 3 even longer. If you haven’t noticed this by now it’s YOU who hasn’t been paying attention
Right back at you
You talk like someone with no friends who never leaves his house.The saddest thing is that you don't even realize the terrible damage the Internet has done to you. Your perception of the real world is entirely fabricated. I jnow several cases like you, all sad.
At the end of the day it'll just be are you with me or against me type of deal huh?
The left has already been operating like this for at least 7 years (in the mainstream). The right is not there yet but is fast approaching that point, and that is when conflict begins.
they need enemies to justify their existence so if you're not first on the list you're definitely next
Cope. You will seethe about politics pointlessly for the rest of your life
And you'll keep seething endlessly about a culture war you claim is fake or doesn't matter.
cool, what does you posting on Ganker accomplish?
venting
>add another gameplay option
>censorship
Only e-girlcon is based. homosexualry and trannism needs to be banned.
Putting a stop to normalizing and celebrating mental illness is good, you homosexual
thinking about it anti pedophilia laws are just censorship
We don't tolerate the intolerant :^)
When you kill your enemies, you win.
You're fricking right it is, cuckservative israelitepawn.
You guys kept saying that we shouldn’t tolerate the intolerant according to some guy’s paradox, and non-binary people are intolerant of those who don’t believe in their delusions, so yes, with your logic, it’s correct.
Yes, when I agree with it.
You belong in a mental hospital you broken husk.
except that games get censored or bared from systems for putting in lewd shit now.
And the way around it is to make characters gay or some freak.
it is when it supports my politics
Total free speech is a fricking moronic position, because corporations will eventually use their disproportinate power to silence dissent, whether it's through firing dissenters and making them unemployable, kicking dissenters out of every credit processor so that they can't do basic commerce, etc...
To have true free speech, you cannot tolerate movements and ideas that seek to destroy the concept of freedom of speech, such as the LGBT movement and big capital.
I'm glad more people are realising the "paradox of tolerance" meme can be applied to literally anything to justify violence against your enemies.
People who quote Popper are inevitably either complete pseud idiots or immoral opportunists who see him as useful.
Reading contemporary views of him is fun because of unflattering people like Strauss and Voegelin thought of him as a total brainlet that couldn't understand Plato.
>beneath contempt: it was the most washed-out lifeless positivism trying to whistle in the dark, linked to a complete inability to think “rationally,” although it passed itself off as “rationalism”. I cannot imagine that such a man ever wrote something that was worthwhile reading
>This Popper has been for years, not exactly a stone against which one stumbles, but a troublesome pebble that I must continually nudge from the path, in that he is constantly pushed upon me by people who insist that his work on the “open society and its enemies” is one of the social science masterpieces of our times. This insistence persuaded me to read the work even though I would otherwise not have touched it. You are quite right that it is a vocational duty to make ourselves familiar with the ideas of such a work when they lie in our field; I would hold out against this duty the other vocational duty, not to write and publish such a work. In that Popper violated this elementary vocational duty and stole several hours of my lifetime, which I devoted in fulfilling my vocational duty, I feel completely justified in saying without reservation that this book is impudent, dilettantish crap. Every single sentence is a scandal, but it is still possible to lift out a few main annoyances.
>Briefly and in sum: Popper’s book is a scandal without extenuating circumstances; in its intellectual attitude it is the typical product of a failed intellectual; spiritually one would have to use expressions like rascally, impertinent, loutish; in terms of technical competence, as a piece in the history of thought, it is dilettantish, and as a result is worthless.
I dunno anon, anyone who says "if you kill your enemies, you win" can't be all bad.
elaborate
Man that would be great. It doesn't take a genius to see the damage it has inflicted on the US
always were
>2021
>always
Kyounosuke is a ftm utaite whose been making songs since 2001
there's a big difference between "oh look it's that weirdo, bless their heart" and trying to force to everyone to believe biology isn't real
Abe died for this
DAMN YOU KOJIMA WHY!!!?!
>DAMN YOU YAMAGAMI WHY!!!?!
FTFY
Also, because a Christian sect of Korean origin with links to the LDP ruined his family.
What he did is completely indefensible and should result in capital punishment, but it's not like it was not comprehensible.
>male, female, or non-binary
what kind of genitals do non-binary people have?
I think it's the new word for humanoid squid in japan
so my best assumption is a tentacle
>humanoid squid
so korean?
You know it may just be because I just woke up a couple of minutes ago, but: I think the point is that you don't know what genitals a non binary person has. It feels like it could be a reaction to how open and explicit and pigeonholing the modern internet has become. An attempt to reclaim some uncertainty that has been stripped away.
It could just be the term toboy being corrupted to suit left wing agendas. It could just be a phase women go through like being wiccans.
I'm all for stripping away some gender sterotypes like wearing pink. But like everything it's a slippery slope that allows for rampart degeneracy (Or as pol likes to call it grooming).
*tomboy
But it's not just for women, it's for men. It's slipping away from me now as I wake up more but: it's that anon's post that really got me.
>what genitals do they have
Maybe some people don't want to be defined by what genitals they have. Like, I think this kind of sentiment existed before the internet, but before it was just androgyny and more to the point you could have a life where it didn't matter. The internet did have a stage where your real world factors didn't count, but then a push on the internet for 'if you're female you must X, show breasts or gtfo, etc, if you're male you must Y' has made some people feel like they need to stake out a territory where that doesn't matter.
>and more to the point you could have a life where it didn't matter
you still have a life where it doesnt matter. This shit is nothing more than attentionwhoring
What do you mean? non-binary is presented as if it is distinct from male and female, so it must have a unique set of genitals being its own sex.
You are preaching to the choir here buddy
Why not go out into the real world and say this to someone who actually needs to hear it
Most non binary people don't take hormones and just dress like their blind, so it's usually very easy to tell what genitals they have
>what kind of genitals do non-binary people have?
Male or female ones.
Why give them a different label when they're male or female?
Non-binary is for people who want to be part of the LGBT circle without actually committing to anything.
They don't want to do gay sex
They don't want to cut off their dicks or reshape their veganas
They simply pick a pair of pronouns and walk next to the gays and trannies while collecting the same brownie inclusion points.
Example: Ezra Miller
>is clearly a guy
>only has sex with women - real women
>assaults men AND women
>steals shit and punches people in the face
>still has "their" job because Ezra Miller considers "themself" non-binary using "they/them" pronouns
>non-binary
Literally not a thing.
What're you gonna do about it?
cry about it in my echo chamber to feel like I'm making a difference
You can only make a difference through money.
then go make some instead of crying to nobody on the internet
I'm telling that to a crybaby, learn context.
As someone who has been getting manga lately, you'd be surprised how much gay manga there is both in current years and the past. You can usually tell by the cover and name of the manga without having to read its description. One had a real funny name though, wish I remembered it.
dick fight island?
kek yeah that was it
The elaborated dick armors are the best, I can't forget that manga no matter what thanks to that.
The difference is that's being made because people are jacking off to it, not because it's pandering or trying to hit diversity quotas.
Do you know anything about Japan?
thats cool, but none of the bachelors are frickable in Wonderful Life.
now rune factory 3 has frickable husbandos. If they add gay romance for it, I'd be down
They redesigned them to be tho
LGBT shit already got plenty of attention in manga, but you don't see Ganker crying about it, or even discuss it for that matter.
there's one asperger extraordinaire that gets extremely upset at anything /u/ for years now
coincidentally he's also a gay diaperfur on reddit
Isn't a lot of that stuff like "well achkally, they are trans now" when in reality is like homosexual femboys
Yes.
What a disingenious list.
>Nononono
Oh oh oh uh Hahahahahahaha!
>or even discuss it for that matter.
key point right there
because its not forced in. People can smell disingenuous bullshit from a mile away. And it helps that they don't rape new IP in manga with this BS. Take for instance bleach coming back and kubo suddenly making ichigo realize he is a homosexual.
Make your own IPs and stuff all the homosexual and trans shit into it while censoring lewd scenes. Buy they will not. Want to know why? Because they have to rape and corrupt pre-established IPs to have any chance of selling.
Take the new Tolkien TV show for instance. With the amount of money Amazon spent on it, it would never see a ROI (return on investment) if they called it something else and had it have nothing to do with middle-earth. And made it some generic fantasy story. It would stop the b***hing about the show, but they would have a infinitely lower chance to make their money back.
I agree, LGBT pride can only go beyond if they get into the popular IP. They don't have time to spend more into creating new IP for purpose of diversity shit, the same thing happened with gay superman, marvel etc etc.
they cannot create, only corrupt
procreation for example
as opposed to you who can create but choose not to and to corrupt instead
>no u!
pls, stop trying to make a snide remark before thread ack
*farts in your mouth*
cringe
this is what happens when their only connection to western audiences are woke translators saying this is what will make their games popular in the west.
more like what happens when your only connection to japan is nintendo games
That's why anyone who cares should give them more connections to the west, the normal west.
Its funny how fricking moronic this board has become about garbage pol shit. Japanese people (moreso if youve been to Japan) are super homosexual in general and not scared of gay shit, much like you jerking off to futa trash.
Its a weird double standard you insecure incels have over caring about others sexual preferences. This is why you cant ever get a woman. You obsess over garbage like this
>Source : my gays said so
Be honest famm, were you actually going to play it? I don't see why you would, considering it looks worse than the GameCube version.
Japan was the last remaining bastion of right wing traditionalism. This signifies an end to that.
>right wing traditionalism
Since fricking when, '45?
LOL. LMAO even. You will never be accepted as an honorary Japanese.
Why have nips been against gay marriage historically anyway if they don't have religion?
It's not about following religion. Same as when zen buddhists in Imperial Japan endorsed state violence--religion conforms to societal norms
muh honor and corporate slave culture pressures nails not to stick out lest they get hammered
also japan has always just been 20 years behind the US in all things as a rule, they probably just found out gays existed when gay marriage was legalized over here
>It's another American that thinks if your culture isn't the same as our black worshipping culture then you're behind us episode
weeaboo virgin
Because gay marriage makes no sense traditionally, as marriage is a social institution with the purpose of raising children.
1. Not traditional because it has nothing to do with starting a family and having kids and all that. A lot of gay shit existed in feudal Japan, but it all prostitution and some gay soldiers fricking each other.
2. Medical textbooks they got from Europe in the 1800s and early 1900s said it was gross and a sign of mental illness and they took it to heart.
>gross and a sign of mental illness
Because it is. The anus is not a sex organ you weirdo.
>inb4 if its not, why does it feel good
So does poking your earhole, does that make it a sex organ too? Fricking degenerates.
Generally speaking they weren't. You could frick dudes as much as you wanted as long as you still knocked your wife up.
It wasn't until gay rights activists started coming over from the west and tried to tell everyone that they don't want to make babies that there was backlash against it.
Deep down most people believe in morals and a sense of what's natural, even a higher power. Hope they find God.
God sucks and is for the groomed
May God bless you
*tree sneeze away*
this kills the Gankerermin
>there are morons itt that literally think that the average nips support their AIDS-spreading troon lifestyle
This is why libtards lost the culture war hard.
You need to use a bit more subtlety when baiting. Going all out straight away in the first sentence makes it too obvious.
I recommend leading into it.
10 years ago America didn't support same sex marriage either. Things can change very fast. Today it's non-binary characters in Japanese video games, tomorrow it'll be transing 6 year olds in Japanese schools and imprisoning parents that object to the practice.
Cool story bro, but Japan won't even budge on immigration. You think they'll capitulate to gay pressure?
>but Japan won't even budge on immigration
Uh... they just revised immigration policies to allow for a massive increase of migrants. And this is a right wing government doing that. They're hoping to get like half million migrants in just a few years.
If you're talking about seasonal migrants in certain sectors of industry that's a nothing burger. They did the same with Filipinos in elder care back in the late 90s. Once their contract is up they give them the boot.
Japan can open the doors all they want but 0 wage growth for 30 years will make it trash for anything except 3rd worlders.
And this is why nobody is migrating to Japan but third worlders. The majority of the migrants are Chinese, Vietnamese, Indonesian, etc. White people don't want to go there.
People from the first world seldom leave their countries.
Unless it's to another first world country, e.g. Australian migrants were predominantly educated Europeans until they opened the floodgates to the chinks.
What I'm saying is there aren't large swaths of people from a G7 country moving to another G7 minus those who do it for work. Most emigration is from the turd world to the first.
Japan has a higher minimum wage than burger land.
Dude, they literally have schools that allows teens to wear male or female uniforms. Some are even designing their uniforms to be ungendered.
So, what? It's probably more fetish fuel. It has nothing to do with LGBT politics. Gay marriage is still banned, japs being perverted is a completely different issue.
>fetish fuel
school policy that was literally met with positivity
>gay marriage banned
They aren't. In asia, Japan, Taiwan (not sure about S.Korea) are a few that has decriminalize gay marriages. What cope are you going to post next?
Gay marriage was never criminalized in Japan. It's simply illegal and remains so. You didn't even bother listing if the school is public or private. Because if it's the later it's a literal nothing burger.
>They aren't. In asia, Japan, Taiwan (not sure about S.Korea) are a few that has decriminalize gay marriages. What cope are you going to post next?
Gay moron cope is the most amazing thing to behold, you morons literally think that japan have legal gay marriage when its literally an American globohomosexual base that has that(Taiwan)
homosexuals are highly looked down upon in Japan
sounds like they need to keep doing it even more and harder
>homosexuals are highly looked down upon in Japan
Japan accepts gays and lesbians more than the US homosexual.
no they don't
Yes they do, stop lying.
quit being a homosexual and making things up in your head canon
Which country is gay marriage legal again? Which country has troony athlete's and troony admirals? Which country has a whole month dedicated to gays and nigs?
They are treated as a "immma gonna rape you" joke
you can be gay married in japan it just won’t be recognized by the government
how hard is this to understand?
>you can be gay married in japan it just won’t be recognized by the government
And thus isn't worth shit, proving my point. gays can also get together in anti-LGBT Hungary and Czech, doesn't mean the government will entertain them.
Lmao at Israel
>we don't hold gay marriages here, but if its elsewhere its a-ok
If that's enough for a country to "recognize" gay "marriages" then a lot more countries will be marked here.
>globohomo
Spotted the kacap. You don't need gay marriage, it's called joining the russian army.
Things didn't 'change very fast'. California voted to ban same sex marriage, the court ruled it constitutional, and then Hollywood pumped out propaganda - but nobody actually changed their opinion. It's all an illusion.
not understanding that other people have different opinions than you is a symptom of severe autism
>10 years ago America didn't support same sex marriage either. Things can change very fast.
By your logic, the troony cult is gonna get banned by the 2030s
😀 I hope it happens here soon. I personally just want them to name it differently to "Marriage". They did not have to call it that but they did to dig their heels in and be rude
>instead of getting maaaried, you'll be... butt buddies!
>instead of bridge and grooom, you'll be.... butt buddies!
in japan it’s called gay unions not gay marriage and honestly the majority of people who want it to be legal just want the tax benefits
>1 (one) advertising agency survey
>anything approaching valid research
moron
well in that case you clearly must have evidence most nips don't support it, there clearly aren't any other polls that show the same thing
I'm not going to explain to an insane culture warrior on the internet how to assess the value of information. You can read this and maybe learn a little though. Good starting point, place to dip your toe in the water in terms of thinking critically about research and information.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0024363919873762#bibr10-0024363919873762
>translation
>I have no evidence to actually support my claim but I will pretend I do as cope
still waiting for that actual proof you have Nips are opposed to LGBT in general
I didn't say that, I said what you posted functionally isn't evidence.
Don't bother, there's a reason why morons here think that an irrelevant game out of hundreds of game that came out of Japan is an enormous win for them.
Still waiting for the confirmation that said game allows same sex marriage. Has it been confirmed 100 percent? And, doomergays always do this. For example they took capcoms use of the RE engine with it's tendency to render faces in the uncanny valley as proof that Japan has conformed to the west standards. They're desperate.
m8, I actually agree with you. morons here literally thinks that some literal who games are a cultural battleground when it's just a shitty niche game made to pander to tiny faction of troontard.
It's dumb shitposters who's brains have been muddled by American politics. Every studio in Japan has their own design philosophy. Capcoms inhouse studios are different from Team Ninja which are different from sonic teams or Nintendos or Bamco. Just because one game does something doesn't indicate some new policy about LGBTQ. Infact, with respect to foreign influence in Japanese gami g most of the investment is from the middle east not America or EU these days.
you were never and will never will be japanese.
That's not an answer to the question.
>Original property
>doing what the artists and writers thought was cool
They can do what they want
this thread has convinced me to preorder
not an alphabet person but I love seeing you lot seethe
Is this yuri?
it looks very possible to fall asleep to out of boredom, so probably
Test
Honestly, the gayshit doesn't bother me, but the non-binary shit reeks of Americanism.
If this game didn't have this it wouldn't be getting any where near this many threads and attention. Maybe they made the right move you gays are going to market it for free.
>Has the binary
>gives a non binary option
Oh well, at least it gives me the choice to be sane and not an attention seeking homosexual.
>XSNEED
Oh how they have fallen. It's a real shame.
The internet is used to summon demons. You probably have one attached to you as well. Even the so called Christian has at least one succubus attached dragging him or her back to the hub to be drained of sexual love. I know not how it affects the prize in heaven or if we are all disqualified. When exactly is a tree a zombie producer? But the demonic gateway is permanently open and grows faster and wider every day. I’m not sure the elect can close it down. Try to spread the gospel as best you can, try not to coom too much without a wife, but remember there is no total victory on this side of life. This planet is doomed and if we are truly lucky the last days are also accelerating. The love of most is almost completely gone, even hedonism is more about self absorbed hatred than self love. May God’s mercy fall anew.
Tell me more, Nostradamus
Imagine if the succubus doesn't just drain you of energy but also makes you a succubus too and you both drain each other wouldn't that be funny
>Non Binary
I can be Jamie?
Not a story of seasons character moron that thing is from the western bullshit spinoff
Hot, now I can have my own cute bl fantasy with anime teens
another day another thread with white incel chuds complaining about gays and blacks in vidya
your daddy hitler would have gassed you too for being an untermensch
another day another thread with anti-white and incelophobic troons complaining about incels of european stock existing
we're the biggest victims of modern society and you should unironically go be a troon somewhere else
Literally nobody has mentioned either of those things though
>non-binary
Ah, a synonym for “female”, I see.
>LGBT has taken over the Japanese
You're 25 years late
>male, female or non-binary
So the leftards have gone from gender isn't sex to sex also being social construct?
Who would’ve thought leftists were lying all along and just wanted to manipulate people into believing absurdities?
"Don’t get me wrong, it’s cute that you all think you’re the heroes of this little culture war, but -- you’re not. You’re chuds; you’re on the wrong side of history, and I... am the goddamn hero."
7 or so years ago, I was pretty fricking tolerant towards homosexuals and their homosexualry. Now I want to bash the head in on most of them.
I'm far from the only one who feels like this.
your only adult friends are your parents
No, actually. I have a solid friend group. Not many, but the ones I have are quality. I also have a girlfriend.
They mimic my feelings on this subject, for the most part. We see you, groomers.
I don't care
Oh, but you should. You and your ilk think you're safe. Keep pushing, see what happens when the normies snap.
>your ilk
nobody talks like this
People do when insulting others.
When normies snap, no one's gonna give a frick what the media thinks.
the normies are the ones ruled by the media in the first place though
we get it, you want to delude yourself into thinking you're part of some secret badass majority that will effortlessly overthrow the government and bring about a new white christian order once you get off your fat asses, but the rest of us live in reality
How are you living in reality if you can't even tell what a man or women is?
how are you living in reality when you're too busy constantly thinking about dicks and veganas instead of just looking people in the eye and speaking to them?
Because normal people are either male or female. They don't give a damn about any of this pc garbage.
you should know by now no one likes being looked at so moot point
>the normies are the ones ruled by the media in the first place though
They're not incapable of spotting bullshit. No one's gonna think MAP's are heckin valid, no matter what spin the media puts on it. When that fails, they'll start questioning everything else.
Time and time again throughout history, people have thought they could push the masses too far because they had them under their control.
>No one's gonna think MAP's are heckin valid
good thing even the evil baby eating lgbt aren't doing it ether
>"b-but i saw this twitter post that said so!"
you can find twitter posts that validate any shitty viewpoint you can think of. it doesn't mean anything.
>good thing even the evil baby eating lgbt aren't doing it ether
lol lmao this is why libtards lost the culture war hard. You can't even blend into normal society.
satanic panic 2.0
you must have meant to reply to someone else
I only pointed out the objective fact that lgbt people hate pedos just as much as everyone else
besides, didn't 'expert' opinion stop mattering when the cuckservatives all became anti-vaxxers against scientific consensus?
>I only pointed out the objective fact that lgbt people hate pedos just as much as everyone else
Then why do they hate based boomers pointing out how their camp is full of groomer and they had to call literal government agents to defend their degenerate behavior?
>they
who are they exactly? every one of the dozens upon dozens of gay and trans people I know celebrate when pedos get arrested
left and right corporations and political parties are both lead by pedos because american politics fundamentally exists more for name calling and keeping interest groups happy than actually doing anything good for the country
>every one of the dozens upon dozens of gay and trans people I know celebrate when pedos get arrested
did they also celebrate the 'dont say gay' law getting passed in florida?
no? funny that
oh, the 'dont say gay' law? you mean the law that doesn't actually hinder real groomers in any way but just prevents children from learning gay people exist?
if you actually cared about children being exposed to the concept of sexuality you'd throw b***h fits when kids movies had any kiss scenes. but no, as we all know, two men kissing is always sexual while a man and a woman kissing is always romantic
>you mean the law that doesn't actually hinder real groomers in any way but just prevents children from getting groomed by real groomers?
Yes
Your mask slipped off, gay pedo. It's not magically ok when you do it because you're the maligned good guys or whatever you tell yourselves.
>THEYRE PEDOS BECAUSE... THEY JUST ARE, OKAY!?!?!?!
we get it anon, after weeks of searching you found one research paper out of a dozen that validated your narrative and now you're convinced that every single gay wants to molest kids
if we really want to entertain your schizo narrative and go with the notion we should shut down and get rid of gays because a percentage of them are pedos, we might as well extend that logic even further
>kill nonwhites because I read this thing that said they're more violent than us
>kill people with red hair because they're more likely to be gay i guess i dont know
>kill people taller than me because they're more physically capable of violence or something
>kill everyone that isn't me because I don't trust them to be as good as me
oh sorry, I forgot the slipper slope fallacy only matters when it's something that validates you
not even gay or trans, though I'm not surprised someone so obsessed with boogeymen thinks everyone that disagrees with him must be one.
>all this seethe and cope
>because the lgbtqwerty outed themselves as pedos by seething over a law meant to protect children from sexual shit
fricking LMAO
>no actual argument, just crying
so this is the intelligence of a so-called """""normie"""""
I must have wandered into a zoo on accident, because all I see if a chimp
>cant even stay on point or read reply chains proerly
>Y-YOU'RE SEETHING, NOT ME!!!
The dont say gay law fricked your asses harder than monkeypox ever could, huh?
>point out gaping hole in 'we don't want the children to see anything sexualized' narrative
>met with chimping and accusing everyone and everything of being a gay pedo instead of any real counterpoint
yeah, sure buddy, I'm the one that can't stay on point
>met with chimping and accusing everyone and everything of being a gay pedo instead of any real counterpoint
Im sure you can point out exactly where I did that, lmao
okay dumbass, I'll spoonfeed you since you're incapable of feeding yourself
your only argument against "what's the difference between exposing kids to a gay kiss and a straight kiss" was "because gays are pedos and you are defending them so you must be a gay pedo too!"
>your only argument against "what's the difference between exposing kids to a gay kiss and a straight kiss" was "because gays are pedos and you are defending them so you must be a gay pedo too!
Except I never defended exposing children to a straight kiss either, gay pedo. All I did was point out how it's only you monkeypox carriers seething over not being able to indoctrinate children.
Fricking lmao. How angry are you that troony storytime got banned? Be honest.
>Except I never defended exposing children to a straight kiss either, gay pedo.
damn, you're right, I should have been able to instantly tell that you were adamantly against all kissing scenes long before the gay revolution and that you actually genuinely care about children not being exposed to sexuality at a young age, based on your immediate jump to start pointing fingers and namecalling instead of actually making your point
your posts are not the "Gotcha"s you seem to think they are
I already made my point, gay pedo. It's why you're so mad, because you cant refute it in any way. To reiterate:
>cant teach young children about sexual shit of any kind
>Im not seething that I cant teach young children about heterosexual shit, I dont care
>you're seething because you cant teach young children about homosexual shit
Why?
>w-why can't I force kindergarteners to learn about anal fisting and fudgepacking
Outed yourself pedo.
gays only kiss when they are doing it for an audience
You mean the same "based" boomers that want to lower the AoC and wanted to force an underage rape victim to give birth to her rape baby?
>leftard projecting their mental illness onto based right-wing chads
Typical
if i wanted to insult someone i'd call them a fricking moron like a normal person
i wouldn't start larping a corrupt medieval lord
>normies start committing violent crimes toward lgbt
>media frames it as a brutal attack on innocents
>more than half of your potential converts turn the other way because they don't want to be associated with psychos
good job you overreactive morons
"normies" aren't tradcon school shooters
why can't they just say you can be a sexual deviant if you want and frick everyone. frick California and their stupid made up words
The only good homosexual is a dead homo
sinple, really
simply do not buy the game, just download the gamecube rom and emulate ya dinguses.
it's not like this shitty company is going to turn an already mediocre game into an amazing one.
Are same sex marriages possible?
Do you even have a choice in this? Does being only good friends with the same gender means they want to bone you via dialogue and trigger their romantic cutscenes?
I personally think this is the worst of it. Why should I have to fear speaking with every Male NPC. I want to speak with bros not get gay.
Farming games are the gayest genre ever
Fujoshit and yurishit has been a thing for a long time. Now you can expect to see westerners try to paint it as "real acceptance" instead of just fetish fuel for people with shit taste.
This.
Westoids are always trying to reframe things in their favor.
That's what's so funny about the moronic localisations of some of that stuff. It's pure masturbation material and localisers (who are a people lower than dirt, and have a moral obligation to keep their interference in the process of creation to an absolute minimum) try to hide as much of that shit as possible and make it seem like an acceptance thing. I love yuri, and I hate gays.
I'm still waiting for the confirmation that same sex marriages will be in this game. Otherwise it's a nothing burger and shitty doomposting.
Yurigays have shit taste and yuri is trash. I also hate gays.
Yuri and lesbianism acceptance is a gateway into the other forms of gay. It doesn't start with L for nothing.
We saw that in real time in gaming.
>lesbians? sure! girl-on-girl is hot!
>bisexuals? okay, they're still half straight! and more girl on girl!
>gays? okay! i guess it's on fair!
>trannies? well shucks, it is the current year!
All over the course of 15 or so years. Lesbianism is a trojan horse.
>lesbianism is a trojan horse
wasn't it proven that trojan horse never existed and it was something an ancient writer came up with, and we simply didn't have other sources
Probably, but it illustrates the concept well enough.
So why am I supposed to be upset?
I wonder if Jap developers who do this truly believe that the whole West believes in this bullshit.
They have been taking everything at it seems with their mental illness pronouns in JP games.
This is why Ganker is obsessed with trannies because they have been pulling this type of shit
The devs weren’t harassed lmao. The American localization team made the change.
I guess American localizer team is a braindead moron for adding the change
this is a fake interview from an "anonymous" "insider" nintendo employee
literally a "my dad works at nintendo" tier source
Who the hell is going to play this farm game over the 13 other ones showcased already. Doesn't even matter.
You can be what you want to be and everyone in the world must conform to who you are!
what does the non binary character look like?
Non binary?
No buy for me.
that's funny 😀
The allure for fujoshis is impossible crack ships. If they actually come true that totally defeats the point. They don't self insert it's the delusion that's the appeal. So no this isn't for fujoshis it's for trannies.
Frick off already chud, this series has had lesbians for years.
No it fricking doesn't?
The first homosexualary bullshit is the newest RF5 after NA publisher forced it on Marvellous.
you guys sure seem to know a lot about gayshit
>*correctly points out that gays have higher STDs and pedophilia rate than based heterosexual people*
>-b-b-b-b-but u-u-u-u- are le gay osama bin laden onee-chan!
Pathetic
According to the American Psychological Association, children are not more likely to be molested by LGBT parents or their LGBT friends or acquaintances. Gregory Herek, a professor at the University of California, Davis, who is one of the nation's leading researchers on prejudice against sexual minorities, reviewed a series of studies and found no evidence that gay men molest children at higher rates than heterosexual men.
The Child Molestation Research & Prevention Institute notes that 90% of child molesters target children in their network of family and friends, and the majority are men married to women. Most child molesters, therefore, are not gay people lingering outside schools waiting to snatch children from the playground, as much religious-right rhetoric suggests.
delete this
>For the present discussion, the important point is that many child molesters cannot be meaningfully described as homosexuals, heterosexuals, or bisexuals (in the usual sense of those terms) because they are not really capable of a relationship with an adult man or woman. Instead of gender, their sexual attractions are based primarily on age. These individuals – who are often characterized as fixated – are attracted to children, not to men or women.
the crux of how he makes this argument. even though men rape boys insanely disproportionate to the amount of homosexuals, that doesn't mean more gay men are paedophiles because they're neither gay nor heterosexual, they're just paedophiles. absolutely compelling argument, just redefine stuff until you get the answer you want.
You gonna address this?
The Child Molestation Research & Prevention Institute notes that 90% of child molesters target children in their network of family and friends, and the majority are men married to women. Most child molesters, therefore, are not gay people lingering outside schools waiting to snatch children from the playground, as much religious-right rhetoric suggests.
>majority are men married to women.
I don't understand. Do you realise what a tiny percentage of the population homosexual men are? Of course the majority are married men you fricking moron. It's a matter of disproportionality.
No because if the number of LGBT were 50% of the population, the number who molest children would still remain the same. Your assumption is that it would increase proportionally.
Genuinely one of the most absurd conclusions I've ever seen. Anon how heavily medicated does your psych have you? I can't even figure out the leap you're making to get to what you're getting to deconstruct it. What the frick.
Your assumption that proportionality necessarily works the same with both small and large numbers based on LITERALLY ONE CHARACTER TRAIT is beyond moronic.
Stop raping kids and the number won't be disproportional.
Lol. Lmao. That same study showed over 80% of the victims were boys molested by men. That's called a gay, anon. Molesting a boy as a man means you're gay, the beard doesn't save you.
I think this is a good point - as someone with a paraphilia, while I do focus on the opposite sex when fantasizing, I'll admit that the paraphilia does take priority over orientation. Which is to say that I've found some gay shit hot because it appeals to my fetish.
>if you have a jeans kink, you'll find a woman hotter if she's wearing jeans
>if you have a jeans fetish/paraphilia, you'll find a pair of jeans hot whether they're being worn by women, men, or a store mannequin
Anon, I'm sorry. But that's hella gay.
Maybe? I jerk off to women 99% of the time. It's more that I'm not really interested in sex so much as I'm aroused by them fricking swelling up until they explode. Like when I'm jerking off at a picture of a hot girl I'm not fantasizing having sex with them, but them bulging and swelling until their lewd bodies explode like bombs. So that takes precedence.
>gay morons literally can't into mat and statistics because they're too mentally ill and have to rely on 1 moron """scientist""" with shoddy methods to prove their non-existent point
Like clockwork
>In research with 942 nonclinical adult participants, gay men and lesbian women reported a significantly higher rate of childhood molestation than did heterosexual men and women. Forty-six percent of the homosexual men in contrast to 7% of the heterosexual men reported homosexual molestation. Twenty-two percent of lesbian women in contrast to 1% of heterosexual women reported homosexual molestation. This research is apparently the first survey that has reported substantial homosexual molestation of girls. Suggestions for future research were offered.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/11844203_Comparative_Data_of_Childhood_and_Adolescence_Molestation_in_Heterosexual_and_Homosexual_Persons
Dude, get over it, you were proven wrong.
I accept both of your moronic concession
>hurr durr actually le gay are no le pedos
>Actually gays have a higher pedophilia rate than starights
>hurr durr who le cares
Pathetic
Prove my tiny bit of modicum
Prove what? That you're mentally ill? Congrats, you did that yourself
Rightoid chuds really are mentally ill.
>study literally proving them wrong
>UHH NO H-HE DIDN'T UHHHH DO THE METHOD ON THE STUDY PROPERLY Y-YEAH HAHA THAT'S IT
What proofs frickwitless
Imagine giving a shit in a correct sense
>imagine x
why do you talk like a 15 year old girl? you're never going to be one.
Yeah I am male
Anymore drivel about the perceived notions perpetual notions about le epic troonzers, chomp
>moron drawing bad faith conclusion because he can't read study
lol
>Females were more than six times as likely as males to be
>the victims of sexual assaults known to law enforcement
>agencies. More specifically, 86% of all victims of sexual
>assault were female. The relative proportion of female victims generally increased with age.
>Sixty-nine percent of victims under age 6 were female.
>compared with 73% of victims under age 12, and 82% of all juvenile (under age 18)
victims.
>The female proportion of sexual assault victims reached 90% at age 13 and 95% at age 19
Most (70%) of the sexual assaults reported to law
enforcement occurred in the residence of the victim, the
offender, or the residence of another individual. Less than
two-thirds of forcible rapes (64%) occur in a residence
compared with three-quarters of other sexual assaults:
forcible sodomy (74%), sexual assault with an object (76%),
and forcible fondling (74%). Sexual assaults against
females were less likely to occur in a residence than were
those against male victims (69% versus 77%).
>Nearly all of the offenders in sexual assaults reported to law enforcement were male (96%).
>Female offenders were most common in assaults against victims under age 6.
>For these youngest victims, 12% of offenders were females,
>compared with 6% for victims ages 6 through 12, and 3% for
>victims ages 12 through 17. Overall, 6% of the offenders who sexually assaulted juveniles were female,
>compared with just 1% of the female offenders who sexually assaulted adults.
So if females are the ones mostly being molested as children, and men are primarily the ones doing the molestation, so are all the men raping little girls gays or not bro?
https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/saycrle.pdf
Not that anon but this mainly suggests to me that men are most dangerous when it comes to rape of both sexes, and should ideally be kept away from children of all stripes.
>Women more likely to be raped
>Men more likely to do the raping
>I-I-IT'S ALL SEXES
What sexuality do you think a man raping a little girl is? you think that man is gay?
What sexuality do you think a man raping a little boy is? you think that man is straight? Just because he was married to a woman during a time where gay marriages are either frowned upon or banned, doesn't mean he's not gay. Not to mention, you gays love bringing up ancient greek/rome everytime you want to highlight a time where gays are accepted. You know, times where man rapes little boys and wrote poems about it.
Hey listen, i know you're triggered I posted actual statistics but try to stay on topic and not answer question with a question me.
If the data shows a majority of females are the victims of sexual assault, and the majority of offenders are male.
What exactly does that say about the sexuality of the majority of offenders in correlation to the victims?
If you start loopin I'm just gonna ignore you.
And most offenders for sexual assault towards boys are men. What's your point?
It says you don't understand what a tiny percentage of people homosexuals are and that no one is saying that men aren't way more likely to be rapists than women, you actual tard.
I don't think they're gay explicitly, like I don't think that a pedophile is going to be attracted to adults of the same (or opposite) sex. To make my stance clear, I don't think that "all gays are pedophiles". What I think is that pedophiles will prey on children, male or female.
My mother was molested by her father as a kid, and so were her brothers and sisters. Does that mean I think my grandfather was gay? No, since he clearly enjoyed sex enough to have almost a dozen kids with my grandmother. But he clearly had a thing for children, and I don't think the gender mattered.
>I don't think they're gay explicitly, like I don't think that a pedophile is going to be attracted to adults of the same (or opposite) sex.
Then you'd be wrong.
The LGBT movement has always been pederastic.
The first ones in the 20s, the grecian libertine ones, held pedophilia higher than they did adult homosex and all the documents from that time were calling for changed age of consent laws moreso than sodomy ones.
In the 60s all of the big homosexual beatniks like Ginsberg were avowed pedophiles and again were even more concerned about age of consent than they were sodomy.
All of the founding documents and big names of 'queer' theory were pedophilia proponents and not shy about it.
The Stonewall Inn, the founding myth of the LGBT movement, was a pedophile grooming hangout.
You could've added NAMBLA as well. Those Black folk were rallying for gay rights since the beginning. No one for some reason remembers them.
Considering 1.7% of men identify as gay (high estimate but I'm happy to use the high bound because it still makes gays look like pedos), and almost all rapes and sexual assaults are committed by men, so we can assume that a majority of that remainder of 12% were raped by men, why are homosexuals at least 3 times more likely to abuse kids?
>gay morons proved for the 2nd time that they can't into math and statistics
Notice that your moronic fricking study didn't even try to categorize heterosexual and homosexual. Notice that your moronic fricking study is from the late 90s while mine is more recent. Notice that your excerpt has literally nothing to do with homosexual proportions.
>The present study extends the research of Tomeo, Templer, Anderson, and Kotler [1]. They found that 56% of gay men in contrast to 7% of heterosexual men, and 22% of lesbian women in contrast to 1% of heterosexual women, had reported homosexual molestation
It was also associated with a higher risk of sexual abuse in adulthood (Hughes i in., 2010). >There are a number of research reports showing a disproportionately high proportion of adult homosexuals or bisexuals (compared to the heterosexual population) who have experienced childhood sexual abuse (Brennan et al., 2007;Rothman et al., 2011;Tomeo et al., 2001). The declaration of non-heterosexuality, commonly known as coming out, in these cases may not be so much a manifestation of sexual integration as a call for help.
This is why leftard has lost the culture war hard
every developed nation in the world is trending decisively towards accepting and identifying as LGBT, this "think of the children!!!1!" panic doesn't work anymore
I accept your concession
This was done during Abe, right? Now he's dead.
That ruling was from june of this year. Abe's tenure ended in 2020.
you aren't japanese. Anti-LGBT japanese are mostly confused boomer fossils just like in America. The clock is ticking for them
2 more weeks
2014 study of the whole population, not a random selective study by some ad company found 52% disapproval of gay marriage.
and japan's population is rapidly aging. Imperial era dinosaurs are rapidly dying out, nobody gives a shit what nanking deniers think
>Nanking deniers
Frick off tankie, you'll never get Japan. Gay marriage is still illegal seethe more.
Liberal order's going to fall apart before Japan does, you were too slow.
why do people always say this?
I’ve been to japan I barely see old people walking around
Japanese people move to rural Japanese-only areas when they get old like 99% of the time. You'll never see old people walking around in the cities.
Go to a rural place. State capital cities dont count for shit with all the kids going there for job opportunities.
>muh nanking
american dumbass spotted
Betting it's a asiatic.
Nah kong-reans seethe about it ad nauseam and chinese have weird hangups that out them immediately.
If people just pretend it matters to the jps, young or old, it's definitely an american.
Right-wing Japanese people still seethe about the firebombing and nukes though which is kind of hypocritical.
Nothing hypocritical about it.
Complaining about crimes that your enemy has committed against you while mocking those who you have committed crimes against is hypocritical. I'm guessing you're one of those people who thinks Japan "dindu nuffin".
There wasn't a single country that didn't commit war crimes in WWII I don't give a single frick about war crimes committed 70+ years ago
>Japan "dindu nuffin"
Correct.
It's just atrocity propaganda that americans are propping up because they see it as a useful wedge to force them to bribe Koreans and harm Japan economically and demographically.
Just like all other atrocity propaganda we still hear about.
t. abe's ghost
americans firebombing major population centres and killing a million people in a war that was already won, A-okay. Little bit of wartime rape, apparently way overboard.
I'm sure they have more time than the homosexual troons who are going to commit suicide.
any sane person should be anti-lgbt
I don’t care what you identified as if you bother the children with such bullshit you’re getting punched.
Whats with all this fake made up pretend definitions out-of-the-blue-sky-frick all at once of sexual orientations?? It is perplexing in a very unique way to moi
no shit, leftard cancer is still spreading every day because it's being propagandize as the "morally right" thing to do
it's inevitable when the arguments their detractors rely on are the same ones that are used to justify racism, a topic an even bigger portion of the population is united against
wut?
the frick are you on about
people stopped watching the oscars because everyone realized it's just a circlejerk for the same five movies every year, not because "muh politics"
cope
correlation and causation
words that are doubtless too big for you to understand
>Notice that your moronic fricking study didn't even try to categorize heterosexual and homosexual.
What cope is this? the majority of victims are women and the majority of offenders are men?
Do you think there's no correlation between the fact a majority of victims are women and offenders men? or are you saying gay men are just raping young girls?
Such a weird moronic cope. I'll respond to this after I eat breakfast if the thread isn't nuked.
>What cope is this? the majority of victims are women and the majority of offenders are men?
That's like saying the majority of crimes are committed by whites in the US you severely moronic homosexual. DO you even understand what per capita and proportion even means? The fact that you have to cope with overall majority instead of per capita makes your argument even more flimsy than it already is.
>Pedophiles are invariably males: A report by the American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children states: "In both clinical and non-clinical samples, the vast majority of offenders are male." The book "Sexual Offending Against Children" reports that only 12 of 3,000 incarcerated pedophiles in England were women. Significant numbers of victims are males: A study of 457 male sex offenders against children in Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy found that "approximately one-third of these sexual offenders directed their sexual activity against males." Homosexuals make up less than 3 percent of the population, not "8 to 10 percent" as your article reported. A recent study in Demography estimates the number of exclusive male homosexuals in the general population at 2.5 percent and the number of exclusive lesbians at 1.4 percent. Homosexuals are overrepresented in child sex offenses: Individuals from the 1 percent to 3 percent of the population that is sexually attracted to the same sex are committing up to one-third of the sex crimes against children. A study in the Journal of Sex Research found that although heterosexuals outnumber homosexuals by a ratio of at least 20 to 1, homosexual pedophiles commit about one-third of the total number of child sex offenses.
this is assuming that pedophiles who identify as straight are homosexual
And? They're still literally homosexuals and they're still overrepresented in child sexual abuse cases.
you're deliberately misreading the part where most "gay" pedophiles have straight families, but I'm sure traumatizing more children by punishment will fix something
>you're deliberately misreading the part where most "gay" pedophiles have straight families,
Are you even listening to yourself you literally moronic homosexual?
>hurr durr them uncles be banging their nephew boys but dem be married to woman so that means they no gay
They are still gays and they're still disproportionately gays. Your cope does nothing to refute this.
Except it's not because a general crime statistic is also not including the victim statistic to point the correlation. Your moronicly illogical argument only works if you ignore the victim portion and draw an incredibly stupid correlation that somehow paints majority female victims and majority male victims somehow equates to higher incidence of male victims being raped by men.
Again you either concede the data cannot infer sexuality because it makes you angry, or you acknowledge that a majority of interactions in childhood sexual assault are between men and young girls.
Your per capita schizo posting literally means nothing and is such a MASSIVE deflection and goal post shift it's honestly funny.
>Except it's not because a general crime statistic is also not including the victim statistic to point the correlation.
Just like your moronic study since it doesn't even categorize heterosexual and homosexual perpetrators and victim. The fact that you keep defending your moronic methodology without even bringing tons of modern studies that actually include those shit defeats your entire cope argument. Also, nice try deflecting the fact that your study is from the fricking late 90s instead of more modern shit since that makes your claim 100x more moronic than it already is. There's a reason why you won't even try to refute my original argument in that homosexuals groups commit a higher pedophile rate than heterosexual.
>Loopin
So you concede that you can't infer sexuality based on the data because it makes you angry?
Also there are modern studies that show children aren't more likely to be raped by gay couples than straight couples.
Anyway stop dodging me you little b***h. What inference on sexuality do you draw from a male sexually abusing a female?
Insane pivot, I kneel peanut brain chad.
>So you concede that you can't infer sexuality based on the data because it makes you angry?
So that's what this is all about? Your inability to literally find a single study that refutes the research that I've cited? Lol nice job in proving all gays are mentally ill and moronic
Goddamn you're dodging me harder than ali dodged the draft man.
>What inference on sexuality do you draw from a male sexually abusing a female?
You're dodging my original point faster than Ali's dance move
>homosexual have higher rate of child sexual abuse than heterosexual
The fact that you had to cope with some outdated studies that have been thoroughly debunked itt shows how all gays are moronic and mentally ill.
>Thoroughly debunked
You posted one non-peer reviewed study, stop dodging me you homosexual, you've been doing it since the start of this chain.
>What inference on sexuality do you draw from a male sexually abusing a female?
Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network: https://www.rainn.org/statistics/children-and-teens
Girls more likely to be sexually assaulted than boys
CDC: https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/childsexualabuse/fastfact.html
Girls more likely to be sexually assaulted than boys
Yeah no shit genius, almost all men are straight, and almost all rapists are men.
Thank you for finally acknowledging logic.
Homosexuals rape significantly disproportionately relative to the tiny fraction of the population they represent.
now why dont we take that logic to its proer conclusion then?
>almost all men are straight
>almost all rapists are men.
>Thus, almost all rapists are straight men
meanwhile in reality
>Although heterosexuals outnumber homosexuals 20:1, homosexuals commit 1/3 of total number of
What could possibly be the reason for this disconnect?
>what is per capita
>Although heterosexuals outnumber homosexuals 20:1, homosexuals commit 1/3 of total number of
fricking lmao the memes literally write themselves
>Although they're 5% of the total population, homos commit 33% of all pedophilic crimes
That's because homosexual pederasts magically cease becoming counted as homosexuals when they abuse children in any discussion with leftists and soclibs.
For example, the investigations into abuse within the Catholic church have found that 85% of all cases were by homosexual priests abusing little boys.
Even including grown homosexual men, who were into teenagers and older, who defended the pederasts.
All literature on the subject prevaricates around this and pretends their inclinations to rape little boys has nothing at all to do with their homosexuality. (much like literature on Stonewall avoids mentioning that it was a hangout for older middle-aged men to pick-up minors)
But on average little girls are more likely to be sexually assaulted by men then by women? in fact young girls are more likely to be assaulted by a male parental figure than young boys.
>But on average little girls are more likely to be sexually assaulted by men then by women?
Because homosexuals are less than 2% of the population.
Even if every single one of them was a pederast and if even less than 1% of straights were pedos the latter would still be the majority due to simple demographics numbers.
What matters when looking at communities is the rate of prevalence within the subset.
>Because homosexuals are less than 2% of the population.
This is literally cope and a moronic fallacy that you can't prove.
It's like saying one big cup has 5 sponges in it and another cup has 1 sponge in it, but because you change that cups size to the bigger cup it will magically get 4 extra sponges out of nowhere.
Literally moronic nonsense claim.
The original claim was that homosexuals molest children more than heterosexuals, but most child rape victims are females and most child rape offenders are male.
So are you saying men who rape young girls are homosexuals? depending on your answer I'm gonna screencap this for later keks.
This is just completely wrong and also goal post shifting, unless you concede that a man raping a little girl only counts as a gay when he chooses to identify as a gay.
Again the original claim was that gay men on average commit more sexual assault than heterosexual men, yet females are overwhelming sexual assault victims, and men are overwhelmingly sexual assault offenders.
So if the majority of sexual assault interactions are from men to women, how do you classify that? what do you call a man who wants to have sex with a female?
Do you call him gay?
>This is literally cope and a moronic fallacy that you can't prove.
Verifiably the case since ages back. Homosexuals are not, and will never be, a large part of the population.
>The original claim was that homosexuals molest children more than heterosexuals
Nope.
I went up the chain of quotes and looked just to be certain. The exact claim was that, quote:
>"that gays have higher STDs and pedophilia rate than based heterosexual people
Higher RATE.
Not only are you dishonest but an illiterate to boot.
every single gay person was molested as a child or had some sort of traumatic sexual experience when they were underage
The really fricked up thing is how okay gays are with the child molestation in their "community". Like you don't generally get whistle blowers and even the most 'normie' gay will generally step in to defend 'the community' versus the welfare of children.
Worse are the ones who see it as an intrinsic part of the culture.
I didn't bring it up because I wanted to reread it to make sure I hadn't missed it but it's really interesting that the study you posted decided not to include a table showing the gender of victims and the gender of offenders, when every other combination was included. I don't think you understand the extent to which this is disproportionate is insane. Not interested in getting involved in a what gay means word-game. You want me to broaden it to include bisexuals? Fine, it's still insanely disproportionate. You're doing some mighty fine somersaults here to avoid the central issue, but it's all you can do.
gays are an endless source of laughs. I still think of the video where this wrinkly old gay says "the fisting guys tend to congregate in this area over here" and laugh aloud sometimes.
Wasn't that the one with the guy who had some weird unknown disease?
It's incredible how easy you people are to manipulate.
Does the Japanese version have those options?
I'm actually convinced this pozzed shit is just something Marvelous USA has always done. Like for example in Magical Melody the ability to marry your farming rival (Male and female route so do the math) was added in the localization.
Thr funny thing is i always wanted free-marriage for gameplay convenience, but if it's done in this moronic sjw politics way i'd rather not have it at all.
Besides most of BM ripoff games had shota protags and all shota r twinks anyway so i didnt care much.
And the funny thing is the target audience for these is kids so it'll always be shota x e-girl marriages every game no matter now many anlgosphere trash twitter trolls seeeeeethee.
>who cares, I'll just replay old games
>they trannify old games nd resell them
I officially despise anyone who opposes emulation now.
>x gender has been a thing for decades
>several seiyuus and idols have come out as x gender
it’s like you guys know nothing about japan
I'm looking at the jp wiki and I'm seeing a bunch of gaijin and 2 mangaka, one of which still wants to be a she.
NOOOO YOU CAN'T HAVE AN OPTION I DON'T LIKE IN THE GAME!!! WHAT IF I ACCIDENTALLY PRESS IT AND THE NPCS REPLACE ONE WORD WITH ANOTHER FRICK!!!
Yuri is good but what the frick is non-binary?
I don’t know no one itt will show a picture of what it looks like
>all eligible marriage candidates available for romance regardless of that choice, you can truly be who you want to be
Fat ugly bastard x e-girl confirmed.
But which of these do you wanna play?
Based
Screw election tourists
have a nice day you moronic revisionist. I've got shit from my 2012 folder that would make half the people you hang out with on discord kill themselves.
newbie
i've played more riichi mahjong with people from this site than you've had hot dinners you fricking poser moron.
Wasn't it the same in the last one?
Regardless, the "every character is bi" shit is what really gets on my nerves. Not only does it completely devalue every character, but now you gotta deal with all of the male characters being gay for you.
this
dragon age is one of the only series I can think of that has characters actually having preferences
I guess it’s just easier for dialogue to make everything the same but it’s so lazy I don’t know why more games don’t actually put effort into it if they’re going to do something like this
Mass Effect and Cyberpunk as well
I think the reason it's lazy in these games is because the devs don't actually have interest in the gay shit and are just adding it to appease the west
>try to become bros with male character
>suddenly gay shit
I hate it.
>tfw when my shitpost didn't get a single (you)
what's the point...
Which one is it, I'll look and if I think it warrants one I'll give it a you
Learn, train, try, repeat. Do not give up anon, one day you will succeed.
I gave up long ago, don't do as I did.
so if gays are factually more likely to be pedophiles, and incels are factually more likely to kill and rape women, shouldn't we just get rid of both of them?
You can try. But a lot of the elites are that.
I can smell your projection cumming out of your butthole from a mile away, gay.
>projection
No, thweetie, you sound like you have a dick in your mouth right now. How DARE those fricking homosexuals have sex without you.
Again with the projection. What is it with gays. Do you always think about dick/sex 24 hours or something? Get help.
>If I can't get buggered, no one else can!
Poor little gay kid.
Enjoy your monkeypox
Enjoy your thirst for wiener in silence, homo.
Im not even that anon. Im just wishing you a happy monkeypox while you get piss drunk
Not the guy you're arguing with but you sound super gay, bro. Wanna make out?
Nah im straight. Thanks though
>his most potent insult is accusing others of what he is
>doing it over and over again itt
kek
>such butt discomfort you have to reply thrice
Who cares it’s actually better than type a and b bullshit let the trannies have their option so they can just stfu already
trannies are by definion binary
So, you feel misrepresented or what? Angry because nobody's fricking you in the ass, anon? Surely if got out more people would know how much of a submissive little bawd you are and willing to push your shit in.
Always has been. Hirasawa is too based for this world
Why are you morons acting like this is some new thing? LGBT shit has always been in Japanese media.
Just Americ**ts forgetting Yuri culture has been a thing for decades and widely accepted.
>LGBT has taken over the Japanese
They were always there even back in the 70s
Japan has been releasing trannies since forever
Good I want a Japanese femboy bf
>Anyone can marry anyone
No issues, doesn't affect gameplay
>can play as a "non-binary"
Literally makes zero sense, "non-binary" is a schizo mentality, not a sex. Your physical body is male or female in 99% of cases. If someone wants to make a character as androgynous as possible then thats fine but actively catering to crazies should not be encouraged.
>actively catering to crazies should not be encouraged
this is an even more compelling argument for them not to change this now that it's in
That's cute anon.
China is the last bastion of gaming, what a weird timeline.
>he doesn’t know
this is from 2010
Japanese non-binaries are based
>Identifies as a man
>is a man
>Is the other people who force their weird shit onto him and it bothers him
wow anon
He literally wants to be seen as the gender he was assigned at birth moronic mongoloid
this shit won't have a crumb of the SOVL of the original.
looks like a Chinese mobile game
I’m sorry you hate non muted colors
Just play the old game
I just hope to god RF3 special remains unfricked, it seems like it will be, but god with xsneed who knows
It's 50-50...
Modern xsneed but they also didnt frick rf4s, but iircxsneed had 1-3 nice staff back then?
and dropped
Nobody who actually plays Harvest Moon would be upset about this.
As you can imagine the plebbit homosexuals are frothing with joy over it.
https://www.reddit.com/r/storyofseasons/comments/xdambh/sos_a_wonderful_life_will_feature_same_sex/
reddit has been in full force supporting trannies, this is nothing new. save yourself from depression and just avoid that cesspool
Hasnt the fujo market in Japan always been huge?
>Game has two option malefemale
>they market it for non
>still get mad that there isn’t an option in game
You will never pleased those nut jobs.
Non-Binary isn't a real thing.
>god i hate trannies mutilating kids
>yes im circumcised, how could you tell?
it's almost as if the israelites aren't behind it all...
i'm half-israeli and uncircumcised
I didn't really have a say in the matter.
I'm not American, so your strawman doesn't apply here
>sexual orientation and its related attractions and desires are inherent, and forcing people to hide or repress their sexuality, or worse, convert their sexuality, is harmful wrong
>people should be allowed to express their sexuality as they like as long as no one is harmed
>therefore, all sexualities are valid
I see gays and gay enablers push this argument all the time, but as soon as pedophilia comes up, suddenly the BLT community adopt their opponents' rhetoric of death, conversion and imprisonment to those with a wrong sexuality. So gays, which is it? Is sexual orientation inherent and valid, or is it dangerous and degenerate?
Do you think being a pedo is a sexuality? do you understand the difference between a phillia and a sexuality?
The same difference between a language and a dialect. One has an army, one doesn't.
the difference is that one is still being openly discriminated, be better bigot
should be allowed to express their sexuality as they like as long as no one is harmed
pedophilia harms kids so it breaks this rule
you're surely moronic if you can't figure that out
But so does forcing transgenderism on children. Has since the very first example in david reimer
>david reimer
circumcision strikes again!
your argument would be sound if your definition of forcing transgenderism amounted to anything less broad than "letting children do anything outside of their typical gendered activities (but not tomboys I find them hot)" feel free to correct me if I'm jumping the gun, but my experience with your kind on this board has never illuminated any other way of thinking
outside of the smallest corners of twitter, no one is actually calling for any sort of forced transitioning
my definition of forced transgenderism would be giving 6 year olds hormone blockers and chemically castrating them before they even know what penis is, then making them stripdance for good boy points
But that's just me. do feel free to point out the difference between parents castrating their son with a heated probe then putting him in a dress and parents castrating their son with blockers and putting him in a dress, Im all ears
forcing transgenderism is using puberty blockers when the desistance rate for dysphoria before puberty is 85%, and there is literally no research on the effect of puberty blockers on that rate.
> the desistance rate for dysphoria before puberty is 85%
The study that statisic came from is literally
>letting children do anything outside of their typical gendered activities is troonygenderism
Your attempts at bad faith are so incompetent it's actually funny
>letting children do anything outside of their typical gendered activities is troonygenderism
notice how there's no "forced" here? Almost as if the actual "forcing" is putting a kid on blockers because he played with a barbie doll one time
Wanna try again?
>Almost as if the actual "forcing" is putting a kid on blockers because he played with a barbie doll one time
but that's what the study wanted to do, playing with a barbie was enough to classify you as a troony even if you said you didn't want to be a girl, and then 10 years later when you still didnt want to be a girl you were counted as a desister
Desistance is a such a horrible concept. It validates the cult like mentality these people have.
And? It works. It's a mental illness with a ridiculously high suicide rate, and the desistance rate post puberty is extremely low (not to say that dysphoria can't be significantly lessened, but it very, very rarely goes away entirely). Be careful anon, you're getting very, very close to saying the quiet part loud.
citing transgender suicide rate as a point against transgender people is kind of funny to me
>transgender person commits suicide
>suicide gets used as evidence that transgenderism is bad and causes more rallying against transgender people
>more transgender people commit suicide because of the increased stress, isolation, etc.
it feels like it just creates a feedback loop where it becomes impossible to tell how much of the suicide rate is the condition and how much is the resulting fallout from being in an incredibly vilified minority
racial minorities at least have eachother to lean on, but due to not being an inherited state transgender people don't really have that distinction
No it doesn't, what you're talking about is one of the few things about gender dysphoria that's actually well-studied. It has an impact, but for example divorce is a better predictor for suicide among trans people than reports of bullying or non-acceptance.
Okay, I'm reaching out across the culture war here, 1914 Christmas day football match style. Use sci-hub mate. Although it has almost everything, it doesn't have what you're citing. Thread's dying soon, I'm getting bored. The smaller the numbers you're dealing with, the larger n needs to be. The 85% number might be 50%, it might be 95%, but the thrust of the point doesn't change. desistance happens a lot before puberty, almost never happens after.
>I'm reaching out across the culture war here
I'm good man, thanks though. Hope you have a nice day soon.
>Those who hate you don't win unless you hate them, and then you destroy yourself.
It's just fun to chat about shit anon, and I said culture war ironically. I'm a software dev so I probably know way more trans people personally than you. Threads winding down so I wish you all the best in health, love and happiness. Everyone on this site is a fellow traveller, and I love them dearly.
>society is at the plateau of trans acceptance, ostensibly the most tolerance they will ever enjoy in human history
>troony suicide rate is at an all time high
you didn't think that one through, bro
Are all gays rapists? Does jerking off to drawn gay pornography or internal gay fantasies make you a gay rapist? No, and likewise, being attracted to children doesn't make you a child rapist. You can have urges and choose not to act on them, a concept with which I know some aren't familiar. And pedophilia would be considered a sexuality if it was accepted by society. It's not a matter of objectivity, but societal standards.
the only reason that's the case is because kids are being told that sex are bad. If society normalizes pedophilia then those pedos wouldn't have to resort to force themselves to kids and kids don't have to get traumatized that they had sex with older people. You know I'm right and you can't deny it.
Black person talking about how people should frick real kids isn't funny nor is it even rolling
nor should talking about same sex relationship and yet here we are
of course, that's why molestation-induced DID develops before the age of 10, an age long before children even know any information about sex, not because having a parental figure use you like a fricktoy is harmful to a barely developed brain, but because kids are taught sex is bad!
>an age long before children even know any information about sex
that's the point you moron, those kids didn't understand what happened to them. 10 is old enough to have awareness
>So gays, which is it?
Right there, you said it yourself
>people should be allowed to express their sexuality as they like as long as no one is harmed
so pedo is OK now?
I am starting to believe "globo-homo" BS because of how easily swayed fricking perpetual from conceptive inheritance of "peep*e"
globo homosexual is a shortening of global homogenisation but it's funny that the shit we're dealing with is so fricking homosexual that when people hear it they just think that it means imperialist liberalism pushing gays all over the world. It kind of is anon, it kind of is.
Alot of it is Karens who still believe that sex before marriage is a taboo, while forgetting that Teens are perpetually horny. But there's alot of genuinely fricked up human beings out there that it's easier to just ban underaged sex until you know 100% someone is mature enough. And even then the age of consent is all over the place.
Well I never had sex as a teen so it's not like you NEED sex
/misc/ lost the culture war
About time.
For me, it's Boku No Gay Canadian Uncle
Eh, bachelorettes are still going to interact with a male mc and bachelors with a female mc no matter how many layers of paint you cover it. The love events were designed with a heterosexual couple in mind after all, the creators are just putting a mask over it so the muh representationtards can gobble over it
That's only in the western version
prove it
I would laugh my ass off if someone made a game with three choices: Male, Female, Degenerate
Are children at risk for sexual abuse by homosexuals?
Results: Abuse was ruled out in 35 cases. Seventy-four children were allegedly abused by other children and teenagers less than 18 years old. In 9 cases, an offender could not be identified. In the remaining 269 cases, two offenders were identified as being gay or lesbian. In 82% of cases (222/269), the alleged offender was a heterosexual partner of a close relative of the child. Using the data from our study, the 95% confidence limits, of the risk children would identify recognizably homosexual adults as the potential abuser, are from 0% to 3.1%. These limits are within current estimates of the prevalence of homosexuality in the general community.
Conclusions: The children in the group studied were unlikely to have been molested by identifiably gay or lesbian people.
n way too small for the question at hand, completely pointless. also your habit of quoting stuff then not posting the source with it is cancerous as frick.
>My non-peer reviewed study with like 100 random people is ok
>But not this peer reviewed one with a bigger sample size
okay if you wanna pay for the PDF go for it.
https://publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article-abstract/94/1/41/59154/Are-Children-at-Risk-for-Sexual-Abuse-by?redirectedFrom=PDF
>35 cases
>literally ignores the studies that have significantly more samples because he can't cope getting btfo
lmao see
To date, the consensus in the social science literature is clear: in the United States, children living with two same-sex parents fare, as well as children residing with two different-sex parents. Numerous credible and methodologically sound social science studies, including many drawing on nationally representative data, form the basis of this consensus. These studies reveal that children raised in same-sex parent families fare just, as well as children raised in different-sex parent families across a wide spectrum of child well-being measures: academic performance, cognitive development, social development, psychological health, early sexual activity, and substance abuse.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4091994/
LISTEN UP HULKAMANIACS! YOU SHOULD BE PROUD OF YOURSELF AND WHO YOU ARE BROTHER! PROUD TO BE AN AMERICAN AND PROUD THAT YOU AREN'T A homosexual DUDE!
TRANNIES ARE 4X MORE LIKELY TO HAVE AIDS DUDE
> http://www.nbcnews.com/id/40279043/ns/health-health_care/
homosexualS, WHO ARE 1.65% OF THE US POPULATION ACCOUNT FOR 63% OF THE SYPHILIS CASES DUDE!
> http://takimag.com/article/the_straight_dope_on_homosexuality_elizabeth_mccaw/print
homosexualS ARE 17X MORE LIKELY TO GET ANAL CANCER THAN STRAIGHTS BRAH
> http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/12/the_gay_agenda_and_the_real_world.html
homosexualS ARE 60X MORE LIKEY TO HAVE AIDS THAN NON-homosexualS BROTHER
> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3462414/
46% OF HOMOS REPORT BEING MOLESTED, COMPARED TO ONLY 7% OF STRAIGHT HULKAMANIACS
> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11501300
41% OF TRANNIES HAVE TRIED AND FAILED TO COMMIT SUICIDE DUDE, AND THATS A SHOOT BROTHER
> http://www.nbcnews.com/id/40279043/ns/health-health_care/
65% OF TRANNIES HAVE THOUGHT ABOUT KILLING THEMSELVES IN THE LAST YEAR BRAH
> http://saravyc.sites.olt.ubc.ca/files/2015/05/SARAVYC_Trans-Youth-Health-Report_EN_Final_Print.pdf#page=44
GAYS ARE MORE LIKELY THAN STRAIGHTS TO HAVE MENTAL ILLNESS BROTHER
> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2072932/
LOOK OUT BRITISH HULKAMANIACS! 1 IN 8 homosexualS IN LONDON HAS HIV
> http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2014/11/18/13-of-gay-and-bisexual-men-in-london-living-with-hiv/
homosexualS ARE 200 TIMES MORE LIKELY TO BE DIAGNOSED WITH HIV TOO DUDE!
> http://takimag.com/article/the_straight_dope_on_homosexuality_elizabeth_mccaw/print
27% OF TRANNIES HAVE AIDS, ONLY 12% REPORT IT DUDE
> http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/group/gender/transgender/
MALE TO FEMALE TRANNIES ARE 50 TIMES MORE LIKELY THAN NORMAL PEOPLE TO HAVE HIV BRAH
> http://news.yahoo.com/one-group-people-acquiring-hiv-204557712.html
SO THE NEXT TIME SOMEONE TELLS YOU TO BE TOLERANT OF QUEERS, THAT homosexual PROBABLY HAS AIDS DUDE.
-HH
>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3462414/
COPE HULK homosexual
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4091994/
This source says that fecal matter from a straight white male can cure delusional thoughts .
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4977816/
your move, piss sipper
only read the first one but throwing a few small-sample cross-section studies whose results you like together in order to form a narrative and not making reference to the greater argument you're part of is genuinely a fricking joke.
just read the second study, it's literally just some random academic's conjecture and has nothing to do with the data
pic rel. is the "article" author btw
>Post comprehensive study with multiple references and contributors
>DAS JEEEEEEWWWSSS
God you people are so fricking embarrassing.
I'm just shitpostin' bro, happy trails.
>post a valid criticism of the methodology, then note the author is israeli at the end
what's the problem?
Where's the valid criticism? How do you even tie your own shoelaces?
Referencing the wider argument is 101 stuff.
Since we've devolved to the schizo posting phase of your mental degradation.
You mind if I just start postin' porn?
that depends on your taste
no thanks
you got something not gay?
Lemme check my vidya butts folder
I got'chu.
>gay and nonce
>Doesn't like etna
What're you gay?
It wasn't him, it was me, I'm sorry for confusing you. But yeah go ahead, at least keep the feminine dicks subtle please.
Because they're true. They apply to the majority of people. I have never, in my entire life seen someone say a girl couldn't play sport. Ever. And I grew up playing every sport there is, over two decades ago. You have to make mountains out of molehills to make the argument you're trying to make.
>I have never, in my entire life seen someone say a girl couldn't play sport.
might be because I live in a more rural southern area, but I have definitely seen it before. also worked in jobs with women where the managers would only assign physical jobs to men, and classes of boys and girls having split activities from more outdoorsy things vs arts and crafts. even had older family members scoff whenever any men dressed feminine at all.
almost every single one of these examples was from someone well over the age of 40, but my point is that these still occur
>managers would only assign physical jobs to men.
Come on. Be reasonable. 80 year old men have stronger average grip strength than 20 year old women. That's just common sense.
>beelines for MUH POOOOOOL
predictable.
Stop getting hysterical, you're going to go into hypoglycemic shock, tubby.
Nobody even knows who Hulk Hogan is anymore, Olga.
To this day i still don't know what "non binary" means. I've had it explained several times, and I still don't get it. "You don't feel male or female" does anyone really? Unless you're Arnie or some shit men aren't going around 24/7 affirming to themselves yep i'm still feeling manly and male. I doubt anyone "feels" a gender. Why you gotta turn that into a mental illness?
the term non-binary technically only exists because of the way society assigned traits and expectations to the two binary genders. frankly, if the notion of masculine/feminine objects and actions was dropped the niche that non-binary-ism provides would fade with it, but given how that is absolutely never going to happen I don't really see the issue with letting them do what they feel like. it's not like it requires a whole transitioning process the way it does for transgender people
>I don't really see the issue with letting them do what they feel like.
yea that usually works out well to let a bunch of mentally ill attention seekers to have their way
why can't you just be a masculine woman, or a feminine man? it's what people did for centuries.
because being stuck with the explicit title of woman or man still sticks you with the expectations and pressures of said titles, like men being expected to do physical shit and women being homebodies
leaving ambiguity gives a flexibility they don't really have when they're completely sticking to their gender, and that is more of a comfort to the people that subscribe to it
what century are you living in? did you just step out of a time machine? It sounds like all this relies on getting mad about normal people using pattern recognition and the kind of blank slate thinking that was disproven in the 60's but is somehow still prevalent in the social sciences.
it's nowhere near as common as in the past but stereotypical gender roles are absolutely still pushed around, albeit primarily by boomers and not really younger generations
Doesn't society traditionally shit on those people, though? I get why people would want to forge a separate identity if identifying as female means people are going to expect and try to make you act feminine and vice versa.
David Bowie got shit on? Everyone who participated in the sexual revolution is dead, the people getting high and shagging everything that moved at woodstock are almost entirely dead. You just sound like you're living in the past.
>David Bowie got shit on?
of course he did
though I wouldn't say being a man that dressed slightly fruity made him a feminine man by any means
I mean, David Bowie is like one guy, and was super popular and famous - that's like the definition of an outlier. Did David Bowie mean that a regular man could be fae and feminine without getting scorn from his peers? Because I'm only in my 30s but I still remember how one of the kids in secondary school got shat on and bullied all the time for acting even slightly effeminate.
>fae
stop appropriating my culture and making it gay, thanks. couldn't even bear to read the rest of your post.
If you're not the person I was arguing with, I don't care. If you are, then I feel like you're deflecting a lack of argument on your side by picking on a single word.
Bro if I don't defend the leanan sí they're going to come for me, there's a fairy ring literally right outside my house. They're telling me they're not gay, and that the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow is literally a pot of gold, and not nikocado's gaping arsehole.
kek
Still doesn't reply to my point though. I don't think Bowie's success means that regular men can act un-masculine without inviting scorn or pushback from other men (or women as well). On that basis it makes sense that people who don't feel drawn to either set of sensibilities would want to make a 'grey area' for themselves to inhabit.
My sister had a huge crush on David though. I thought chicks loved him.
Right Wingers:
Losers in the Civil War.
Losers in World War 2.
Losers in 2020.
Losers every time.
100% of right wingers are motivated by hatred and bitterness at people who aren't afraid to be themselves because right wingers know their true selves are fricking loser incels who everyone reviles.
Franco died peacefully at 82 years old. The communists of Spain did not.
And Hitler died crying like a b***h committing suicide as the Nazi regime collapsed around him and Communists paraded the heads of dead SS Nazis through the streets of Berlin.
You win some, you lose some, thems the breaks.
Don't forget Mussolini
It's better to burn out than fade away. Punk as frick tbh.
Then by that logic
is implying that the communists were better off than Franco?
They all had their one day as a lion as far as I'm concerned. I'm glad China became right wing without any violence though. 20th century had enough blood at that point.
>He thinks Hitler actually committed suicide
why is this thread in particular being raided by a seething troony discord
are they still crying and pissing themselves over being btfo in the oney e-celeb thread?
Reminder this guy is straight, republican and had a daughter just so he could rape her.
He also lobbied with his mom, who is republican, to lower the age of consent.
Nah, sounds like false flags.
There are 36 million registered republicans.
posting a classic
Why bother with this lame ass weak Harvest Moon? Rival events will never coming back no matter what, not saying Stardew Valley any better but why bother with HM in 2022? I rather play the original ver.
>get massive harvest moon vibes from OP
>look it up
>its a remake of harvest moon: a wonderful life?
Huh, that explains all the related posts ive been seeing. the game was a big part of my life back in 3rd grade.
dey eat da poopoo
600