It's over for game concept artists
It's over for game concept artists
This phonograph "reads" a rock’s rough surface and transforms it into beautiful ambient music pic.twitter.com/PYDzYsWWf8
— Surreal Videos (@SurrealVideos) March 3, 2023
Community-driven video game blog & discussion
It's actually over wtf
what is this character supposed to represent
Scientific achievement and a reckless disregard for the wellbeing of children.
Essentially John Money if he found uncle Lovecraft's fun time heck hole and came back with some ancient alien can openers.
guy who learned about john money experiments two weeks ago: "hmm, getting some really john money vibes about this bad thing..."
okay retard
fantastic counterpoint
it represents going to my penis
Bondrewd being based and making himself a woman so he can continue his experiments and get the female perspective before he becomes his based Chad self afterwards with new information
The ideal father figure. He was basically Ozen but worse -- albeit, the team knew that going in
sex
THE RUMBLE OF SCIENTIFIC TRIUMPH
SEXO
caring about nothing but evolution and advancement in science
the second you put this on the market people would call it out for the Bondrewd ripoff that it is
Jesus fucking Christ if it wasn't for the botched right hand in the first image I'd have believed this was real concept art. What AI model spawned this?
Bump, looks amazing and i think is a mix or real and ai.
Use prompts like character profile, concept art, official art, sketch, character sheet, blueprint, schematic, purikura, reference sheet, chart, diagram, grid etc.
>AI is masked girl and skin tight suit chad
I kneel to our AI overlords, they are superior
Quick someone steal this design and put it in a successful game so a lot of porn of her is generated
>someone make "Made In Abyss" into vidya
ya we're getting right on that
these are literally incomplete and not usable in an actual game development environment
ok what if I press the button again nerd? What then?
If you couldn't make a usable model out of that you're a failed dev. The entire point of concept art is just to convey the image of what you want the final product to look like. Those final products will pretty much never look identical to concept art because it just doesn't work like that.
If you were a modeler and wanted someone to draw you "Bondrewd but female and hot" to use as inspiration then either of those images would be more than sufficient. Obviously for right now an actual human artist would be able to make very specific changes that an AI cannot but give it a couple years and that will be ironed out.
the different views are literally not even consistent with each other, its unusable, the point of having multiple views is that these views should be of the same model
Unironically sexier as a man.
Femanon spotted
I think he should have some women bodies in the network too.
>normal character but female
Woah
Number 1 mom?
what the fuck even is this
it looks like her chest but there's no briefcase handle
and don't say it's the battery that shit isn't anywhere to be seen
Helmets
Interesting how the AI knows that concept art usually has little drawings next to the main piece - but doesn't understand they're meant to be for details on the model, so they don't make sense.
I love AI. Has anyone made stuff for warframes?
I'm sorry for you, artfags...
joking, I'm actually don't, the more lewd art for me the better, I don't care if it's made by an AI or a fat greasy shut-in
Add a boob window
subarashii
Sorta looks like the Psi-Soldiers from XCOM2 with a splash of some waifu coomer mod.
>what if Bondrewd became Bondbewb.
Thanks doc
You are all required to take a knee and listen to the sound of science winning.
Bondlewd sexo
>Bonrewd but female with fanservice
Unironicaly made it worse. Would be ok if just female without such blatant fanservice
>concept art is meant to be as consistent as possible and shown from various angles and in various levels of detail in order for modellers to have a clear view of how to translate the figure into a 3D space
>I know, let's give this job to the computer that just approximates shapes rather than understanding what it's making
This thing can't even decide on what her coat or tights look like.
It's definitely over for concept artists for sure.
eh, from those pictures I feel like a 3D modeler could fill in the gaps and make a female bondrewd in blender or some shit. when AI can make a 3D model that's at this level we won't need consistency, it'll just be a matter of tweaks and edits.
Modellers already have a hard enough job just translating an already drawn figure 1:1 for a AAA game, asking them to fill in the blanks too is pretty fucked.
Don't you mean an AI will fill in the blanks?
And then an AI will make the uv maps and texture and rigging and import the model into the game project
And then an AI will make the animations
And then an AI will code the game
And of course an AI will be in charge of marketing the game
Don't forget the AI that ships the finished project to steam
The AI is just your smart tool working for you.
Why stop there? Why not turn that tool into an automated factory? Lets start shitting out literal randomly generated shovelware by the exabytes. What could go wrong?
>tfw procrastinated so much on my sci-fi story about AI spreading to every single part of people's lives that it's going to be reality before I even start working on it.
the Ai is really godo for testing concepts, and seeing what looks good. a real artist can see the value and use that really effectively.
It's not all doom and gloom, this stuff will enhance our productivity, atleast for the time being.
>godo for testing concepts, and seeing what looks good
First learn to write and then fuck off.
"seeing what looks good" is absolutey fucking stupid
You're talking about generating random crap until something looks "cool" to you
looks like shit
I have the strangest boner right now. Subarashii.
Stop copying Made in Abyss
100% irredeemable
bonedude but a chick? wtf?
Is this AI concept art?
AI won
Cute
How do you even do this? What's the prompt and what engne you use?
https://twitter.com/STGEAR_CELL
>How do you even do this?
By making a bot that steals the same game concept art OP likes to hate to fit in as a tough guy.
Do you not understand what concept art is supposed to be?
Normal Bondrewd is cooler
oya oya
good morning sir
>IT'S OVER FOR CONCEPT ARTISTS!!!
>Posts an art that's literally just an already existing character with their head slapped on a typical AI coomer body
Not yet. Maybe someday, but this is a horrible example.
try asking some zoomer "artist" to make a coomer body
>typical AI coomer body
jesus christ garden gnomes mindbroke you so hard
you should go for a walk or rent out a whore then you dumb fucking retard
>garden gnomeS garden gnomeS garden gnomeS
Fuck off. I love a hot slut as much as any other guy but it still doesn't change the fact that these AI are mostly based off stealing art from human Pixiv artists who of course love their sexy women.
I have no doubt there will come a time (and probably soon) that AI will take over art but this is just a shit example.
pussy plus ass checks. yes it's a coomer model (not that there's anything wrong with that)
normal women also have pussy and ass cheeks
>being attracted to hentai sluts is gnomish
either the garden gnomes infiltrated japan 60 years ago or you have 4chan mindrot
They hated him because he spoke the truth.
also the parts where you'd see multiple designs for the mask are just total nonsense because the AI has no idea what those are there for, and neither does the prompter
Can we pour a glass to all the poor fucks who dropped 30k a year to be in FZD's school?
>AI coomer body
Women have asses, anon
>the boobs look different in literally all of the images
>two different faces in different art styles
Some concept art that is
pfffft
I'm so tired of seeing these lame bitches
AAAARRRGHHHH
WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH HER
It's not consistent with itself, though? It doesn't highlight things an artist would have to take note of when drawing the character? There's no actual notes on designing the character?
I kneel pajeets... it's fucking over.. time to learn how to code...
AI tech is definitely advancing I will admit that but if there's no oversight it'll just burn out into another fad that nobody wants to interact with except for sub-communities making custom made coomer art for themselves.
>but if there's no oversight
What do you mean?
No way to certify if assets being used to generate AI are owned by the people using it, people making AI art of existing characters but peddling it as an original character.
I really like making these
Nice ripoff of Mosha's art except with more fucked up anatomy.
a man of fine taste
I miss him. I miss him so fucking much. RIP
You have no idea how happy I was when I started seeing convincing mosha pngs in my folder. I even manually saved all of his images so I can convert the booru tags to prompts. And the NSFW is excellent.
Bro that bitch has a hand growing out of her abdomen.
Even in death he still provides. God bless him and AI.
my brother
I still miss relatedguy
qrd?
A great artist died about a decade ago.
i don't think he made any doujins anon
Mosha was an artist who died during the Great East Japan Earthquake. He was on the verge of absolute greatness before he was taken away so soon.
Where did you get a Mosha lora? Don't see it on civitai
https://rentry.org/shitty_loras
No, see
Do you use a lora for the concept art theme?
source? i know it's ai but i want to see the normie reactions
https://twitter.com/STGEAR_CELL/status/1634415166468272128
Looks like gender bender version of the villain in that pedo anime show.
Here's your (you)
So was the prompt just Female Bondrewd Bunny Girl?
Probably, I didn't make it.
https://note.com/stelsray/n/n1b1f12e17c5d
mistakes aside, that is a pretty nice asymmetrical swimsuit design
>AI just keeps improving dramatically in mere days when it comes to imitating voices, art, and even videos now
>Some gays still denying the inevitability of it all and that its just a fad ala NFTs
Is this what is was like when cameras, digital art, talkies, internet, television, etc, were first started to be introduced?
It's bigger now because there are more artists and AI is a much bigger deal than the camera or digital art, since it can affect basically everything.
If you're just looking at art though, we haven't seen anything yet. Most people have no idea how important AI 3D modelling and animating will be for media. Not just for games and movies but for pictures too. It'll enable anyone to be a film director basically, you'd just have to talk to your PC and you could create a cutscene in no time.
As
said, its usage will be severely limited due to the need for assets to generate from. As much as you'd like to believe otherwise, these 'AI' can't actually make anything on their own.
You two aren't making much sense. In a post-AI world copyrights mean nothing and you can create new things with AI based on old things, just like how anything that has ever been created was created.
>these 'AI' can't actually make anything on their own.
AFAIK once the AI has been trained, they don't need the reference anymore.
>once the AI has been trained
You still need to train it, hence the need for assets. And any commercial work would need to own those assets, and you'd need to train a new AI every time you wanted to make something different. I highly doubt an AI trained to generate bunny girls will fare well trying to make dragons. An artist can just do both.
>You still need to train it,
They are trained.
>nd any commercial work would need to own those assets,
No they don't.
>and you'd need to train a new AI every time you wanted to make something different.
No you don't.
> I highly doubt an AI trained to generate bunny girls will fare well trying to make dragons.
Ignorance.
You can plug your ears as much as you like, but this technology will go nowhere as it is now. Though it is amusing.
Video game developers and professionals in tons of fields are already using it, why are you so ignorant?
Proof?
Google AI and start reading, you have a lot to catch up on.
You can merge models or overlay them on top of one another. I don't know why you're talking about AGI though.
>You can merge models or overlay them on top of one another.
nobody said anything about merging though. your argument was that a model trained in, say, anime catgirls, could generate pictures of cars, which simply isn't the case.
Anon do you even see what you're posting? That image is completely worthless.
this is the most retarded thing I've seen all week and I went to multiple twitter screencap threads
>start reading, you have a lot to catch up on.
Buddy, I'm not interested in AI like that just show me who is using using it.
Why are you so afraid of the concept of ownership? Does it upset you that much?
he's right though. this might not be apparent when dealing with relatively simple network models like stable diffusion. The model can adapt to some extent and kinda generate something it wasn't trained in, but it'll become a bigger and bigger problem for AGI research that aims for multi-domain operation.
>They are trained.
With our current tastes. As culture evolves, our tastes will change. It will need to be trained further with new, modern, man-made material because we all know incest creates deformities and you would have to be in denial if you think AI would somehow be immune to churning out deformed things when looking at itself for inspiration. Some day we're gonna be craving jack skellington lanky women, and this AI would churn out the same thick girls in swim suits as always, until someone trains it for the then-modern taste.
>Some day we're gonna be craving jack skellington lanky women, and this AI would churn out the same thick girls in swim suits as always, until someone trains it for the then-modern taste.
you can just get a lora for that, or a hypernetwork
If this Iori thing is just model that's trained for what I described, that's besides the point. The point is we're going to come up with something AI does not know how to make with its current training. An AI doesn't know what a Dustalyzer is. Nobody does. I just made it up. But it could exist one day, and someone will try and make AI draw one. It won't know how, because these models have already been trained and it doesn't have Dustalyzers in its vocabulary, let alone the visual concept of one. Times change, language tastes and culture evolve, and an AI that isn't trained with new material will be left behind, and new material comes from human artists.
It takes as little as one image to train a new concept. And the AI does know what a Dustalyzer is, you didn't make it up because it was in this model already.
>how do you get the robot to draw so well, mr roboto?
>we have instructed it to feel only pain and hunger! like all true artists!
thumbnail looks like it's eating it's own ass.
>If this Iori thing
you just outed yourself as a retard that doesn't know what the fuck he's talking about, but will talk about it regardless
>The point is
for a lot of these concepts you could still use a lora or a hypernetwork
secondly, you can just train a small network and merge it into a larger model
thirdly, with an AGI this in theory wouldn't be a problem
fourthly, everybody already knows what you're trying to argue, so what's your fucking point?
> As culture evolves, our tastes will change
This is a meme.
For thousands of years, tastes changed at a glacial pace and people were content. The frenetic trend chasing of the modern era is not the norm, and is entirely a product of Western copyright law and planned obsolescence.
>For thousands of years, tastes changed at a glacial pace and people were content.
This is such a retarded observation and it proves nothing aside from how little you thought through this argument of yours.
Our taste in women has domesticated the once-popular fluffy haired amazon catgirls of 80s anime into the lithe emotionless waifus of today. Copyright has fuckall to do with it.
>once you've put all the references in, you don't need the references anymore
What
in case you were asking unironically, when cars were introduced people wrote articles saaying that horse drawn carriages will prevail and cars were just a rich man fad
Yes, but there's a real chance that the copyright garden gnomes will ruin AI for everyone
/ai/ board when? This spam is out of hand.
We got /vt/ we need /ai/ by now.
jannies hate AI
What does it matter? People spam normal porn, memes, and fanart all the time. What difference does it make that an AI made it?
Cause offtopic is offtopic and boards are made for specific subject. Lord knows Ganker got a bit better once the containment was set for /vt/
Containment works, for both audiences.
So anything original or just copying existing shit/artists again? No?
Name one completely original work a human has made in the last 100 years.
So nothing? Ok. I'll leave I guess.
Expected as much. Keep making elves in the styles of real artists I suppose.
>directly copying the work of someone else is fine because everyone does it.
definition of a cope. if i make a character thats a female version of another one and claim i made it, whether its AI or not, you deserve to call me a plagiarist.
>Humans copy all the time
AI isnt even human. you cant talk shit about chinese bootleg games and then try and support AI art in videogames as though people arent going to make vomit inducing shovelware that looks sort of nice because of ease of use.
name one good work a human has made in the last 100 years that wasnt lambasted when people found out it was made with uncredited work from someone else.
>all art is inspired in way or another
Not what I said
>these AI engines simply streamline the process
Also not what I said
how is this a checkmate? are these both kings? if so he cant just move the king infront of the king, and if its queens black just takes as it doesnt seem like the queen is pinned
>name one good work a human has made in the last 100 years that wasnt lambasted when people found out it was made with uncredited work from someone else
And how is that an argument for your case?
It just shows its just perception. People got trained to praise originality and so people pretend they are original when they infact do copy. Its a game of dont get caught copying.
youre thinking of it analytically like a game or conditioning but thats literal mental gymnastics over simply appreciating an interesting and nuanced take. what kind of pretentious statement is "people got trained to praise originality" when everyone knows and can see the value in someone coming up with an idea themselves.
pepsiman
There's original stuff everywhere wdym? Go to civitai and look at all the original art coming out of the checkpoints. Twitter, pixiv, and Ganker generals have original art too.
Prompt sharing sites are another source of original art, usually they don't use loras.
>original
its just churning out Yoshida's art but worse anon
I think it's better and it is original, you just don't like it. I wasn't talking about that image though, most of what I do is using art styles of existing artists because I like them.
bro this still sucks ass come on man she has a fucking truck for a head you cant unironically think this shit is better than Yoshida's actual work are you retarded
don't care, still like it more.
>bro this still sucks ass come on man she has a fucking truck for a head you cant unironically think this shit is better than Yoshida's actual work are you retarded
We live in a world where sample based beats became the dominant form of popular music and outcompeted more virtuosic instrumental pop, because it was cheaper and easier to create and the public doesn't give a single fuck about artistic vision and integrity. You're a fool if you can't see that AI art is already almost at the point of being good enough.
>b-but it's not perfect
No one cares.
If you have ever, in your life, said "I don't care, it's good enough for me." then you are literally below retarded African kids as far as IQ goes.
And yet we still make better art than you. Being an angry nitpicker who sees nothing positive in anything does not make you intelligent. You're inferior to the African IQlet. At least he can enjoy things.
but you're not making the art the computer is anon
>you aren't making art, your pencil is
It's just a tool. Crying won't change that.
The use of the imagination or original ideas, especially in the production of an artistic work.
>And yet we still make better art than you.
>we
Huh? Bro you're not making anything. What the fuck are you talking about? Do you unironically feel some sort of involvement or ownership in the process of putting words into a fucking text-to-image system and the Ctrl+S'ing the result?
An African drew this while all you can do is make deformed fake imitations of the FF Tactics artist who has actual talent.
Deformed slop
A child's sketch would be more pleasing to look at
yeah that's the thing with AI it's value is entirely surface level and will never be capable of making something interesting or meaningful. Like a child's drawing is infinitely more interesting than some auto generated slop that's pumped put 24/7. Computer generated images simply have no soul and will never be able to compete
When you can generate millions upon millions of images, of course some of them are going get it right.
This is not the gotcha you think it is.
>literally just Sonic with a filter added
Yeah, great "drawing"
"badly drawn"
>People trying to bring up copyright laws now
So, the people opposing this shit are just your typical garden gnome, uh?
You Wouldn't Download A PNG.
What in the world are you talking about?!
>What in the world are you talking about?!
i'm talking about your argument, what's so difficult to understand?
Its deeply amusing to me how you keep posting these images as if they're any good.
>hands
>car disappears through her arm
>fucked up perspective
>fucked up road lines
>fucked up shadows throughout
It looks like shit, admit the technology isn't there yet.
It could look amazing and you would still have an irrelevant opinion. I posted that as an example of anime girl + car which he said was impossible.
>b-b-but it could
But it doesn't. A.I. looks like shit right now even when it's advancing at a rapid pace. A.I. artwork is useless for concept art too because it can't be copyrighted.
It's funny how ai fetishist stop the line at themselves creating.
Ai will create the scripts, the stories, and the art. You won't be sure how human it is what you're looking at and what type of effort was put in to create it. That thing you want to show off to others? Where is YOUR input. You can't have a reasonable justification to believe it was your creativity and effort. Not to mention a much bigger problem of ai social media accounts being used to astroturf ai created content.
Isn't this entirely possible because the mask itself held the memories and the person using it was more or less a disposable meat sack.
yes
>It's over for game concept artists
Aside from the usual observation that it likely took 100 duds to generate this one passable image, why on Earth would it be over for concept artists? I genuinely don't get it, how can you say something so retarded? It's like if when someone invented a mechanical excavator and some smooth-brained monkey started going around "it's over for construction workers". How is a tool that makes your job easier/faster supposed to signal the end of your career? How can you be this terminally retarded??
he thinks concept art is "really nice images of a character" and not "a step in the iteration of an idea" so the concept of drawing the same thing again but with slight nuanced modifiers seems to be lost on him and thinks that the one thing AI is horrendous at makes the profession "over".
you cant talk about this on Ganker really because the ethos of the board is being retarded and hating things to "own" people passionate about literally any aspect of anything.
>the one thing AI is horrendous at
Eh, if you're patient you can iterate pretty well with the tools currently available. Between inpainting, img2img, and just consistent strong prompts you can make small changes. Definitely not the strongest thing it would be useful for for character designers/concept artists though, I think grids and variable prompts just to give explore ideas is a much better use for current workflows.
100 duds don't take much time to generate, what was your point here?
>100 duds don't take much time to generate, what was your point here?
My point here is that it is pants-on-head retarded to suggest that a tool specifically made for making a job easier is going to eliminate that job. Did electric drills eliminate home repair men? Did kitchen electronics eliminate chefs? Did mail sorting machines eliminate post offices?
The mental patients who either masturbate to this tech or doom-and-gloom about it are completely clueless about art, tech and the art industry as a whole. The tasteless imbeciles who churn out a thousand style-mismatched pieces of anime kitsch with giant tits don't seem to understand that in order to make a final product that isn't a one-off masturbation aid they need something that AI cannot fake for them: taste. The concept artists they imagine are going to be replaced by people from Bangladesh are on the same technological footing as them, but on top of that they also know how to deliver to professional standards, how design and visual development actually works, and how to fix things that statistical inference engines like Stable Diffusion fuck up. They are not locked away from computers with Internet access, so the introduction of AI did nothing to erase the gulf in skill between non-artists and actual professional artists. It takes an extraordinary, mind-bending amount of hubris and idiocy to think that you're somehow special because you know how to describe a scene you want the algorithm to spit out should look like. But all the gloating from tech-cultists who think this is somehow an end of actual artists suggests that they really, genuinely are so deep in the Dunning-Kruger dimension that they think they have some secret, mystical tech and possess secret, mystical skills because they can write text into a textbox and select a passable image - hence they are cretins.
If they were honest, they would just admit that they have a doom fetish - but then, we wouldn't be having this thread.
It was a rhetorical question. You weren't making a point you're just being a mad nerd. This post proves it.
Do you see any apothecaries around?
>it's over for _________!
>posts generic le heckin cool mashed up fantasy garbage art
every single fuckin time. give these dickheads their own board already
this is what will happen when "idea guys" get their hands on AI game development tools
So the only thing useless out of these characters sheets is that AI still struggles with consistency.
Multiple views of the same "character" on these generations sometimes have wildly different features.
While on the brainstorming and development end this can save a lot of time iterating various ideas, final designs for production for animation, modeling or artwork will have to be cleaned up or even redrawn to have a consistent framework for additional work.
It's not making the artist obsolete per-say, just making the pipeline more exclusive; requiring fewer good illustrators.
Now, copyright gets complicated, because even if generations are original, the training data is not. Rulings on this could be devastating for publishing AI work as a model with even a small amount of data that was taken from incorrectly licensed sources could poison the entire model. Proving that in court would, however, be very difficult as well.
It's a shitshow and we all have front row seats. Bring some popcorn.
Character consistency will be totally solved when text/image to 3D exists.
we're on the verge of IP law collapse anyways, people are fed up with Idea Barons just buying air and pretending they own the wheel.
It's surreal seeing artists who hate copyrights cling to them because of AI lol. Fan artists no less, it's just pure delirium.
this thing has weird fucking g-man proportions and it freaks me out, like it's an SCP and it's going to wring my neck or some shit.
Lanky girls are cute.
It's using a Code Geass lora so you get spaghetti people.
Baby Mario you leave that titty-elf alone!
>only one nipple
>malnourished right leg
Life in the ring brings a lot of sacrifices.
it's tough out there
>artists not wanting to get fucked over by massive entities now dont want to get fucked over by individuals
not seeing the delirium here lad, i think you huffed too much of your own supply when you came up with your supposed gotcha about hypocrisy
Artists are like 99% pirates who steal photoshop and other tools and use copyrighted work for their art.
When I first got into AI art that's what I really wanted, just fight scenes between characters like that. I don't think it's that easy to do it yet though, but eventually I think we'll be able to say "goku vs mario" and it will produce something decent lol.
>stealing a pen and drawing mickey mouse is the same as pretending you drew a picture of mickey mouse in the style of Anders Zorn
enjoy generating your images and looking at nice things but youre a retard and youre coping with excuses.
Copying how? Where are my excuses? I simply stated a fact. Artists bringing up copyrights as a good thing are borderline insane. They're hypocrites of the highest order.
an artist not wanting to have their work used for profit without their consent or compensation is not insane and thats not hypocritical. youre quite literally making excuses by saying "99% of artists steal and use copyrighted work in their art" which is quite clearly not true so all thats happening is you explaining why youre too retarded to learn how to draw and making excuses for why you like AI art.
i like the images. when they look good. i also like guns but not when someone is waving 3d printed piperifles off a gunsmiths design in public like a dickhead making the actual gunsmith's job harder
TL;DR: enjoy the "art" but dont try to finagle some kind of validation out of what is largely used to be a knuckledragging pleb
there's a difference between
"your AI is making art that looks like mine! that's stealing!"
and
"you trained your AI on my art? did i give you a license to do that?"
>"you trained your AI on my art? did i give you a license to do that?"
The funniest thing is that they would never be able to do with in a million years with the music industry. But with art they just do it anyway.
Aritsts do not respect the copyrights of others and that is a fact. They are hypocrites wanting protection themselves.
That's a pretty retarded assumption. Anyone, not just artists, already get in trouble for copyright violation, to the point Nintendo gets meme'd on for it.
>Aritsts do not respect the copyrights of others and that is a fact.
Its cute how you keep making up bullshit to prop up your crumbling AI fantasy.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Millennium_Copyright_Act
How is this any different from other transformative work?
see
Damn i guess Akira Toriyama should sue like a dozen of mangakas that got into industry by aping his style
Oda too
you can copyright words, why not a style?
dah comrade, fuck being entitled to the fruit of your labor, the community owns everything.
*steals photoshop*
*steals artwork to photobash*
*makes fanart of copyrighted characters*
wait so now pirating is stealing? make up your mind Gankerros
It is unironically ok if a human does it
Why the fuck do people equate shit like this as if a computer had rights
>It is unironically ok if a human does it
>machines can't
law say otherwise 😉
artists arent all fan artists, AI steals shit from people who actually make interesting and original work, which means there's no longer any incentive to make original shit but you're happy to live in a soulless, communist shithole because you're a failure who likes the idea of scrounging off other peoples hard work.
AI is just a tool people use. People steal, always have always will.
AI creates original and good shit too, you're just autistic and can't get over yourself.
Sudden urge to delve to the fifth circle intensifying.
Why do advances in technology make people seethe? Do we really have luddites on Ganker?
The industrial revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.
he said on the video game board with the computer that he owns in the house with air conditioning
Can you really compare the industrial revolution to the AI revolution though?
Not him but the AI revolution will be more important in human history.
I hate chinese and brownies so much
advances in technology got us shovelware and remakes, im not sure how much of a retard you have to be to support that. i can support Yoji Shinkawa feeding his catalogue into an AI to generate infinite soldiers for a game hes working on. not Anon making waifu simulator #2m6/3 with generic hentai art from more talented artists. i want to watch the swordsman use the lightsaber not the monkey
AI generated post
you are AI generated, what now. look at your hands
Polfags are so deep into their own ass with traditionalism they are actually against a tech that allows them to override big corpos and prompt whatever the fuck they want with no censorship
It's not even some /ic/ monkeys shitting up these threads, it's just polmorons.
phew, thank god i just sat around shitposting all day instead of learning to draw
Love and passion for creating things is what drives people to draw and paint. These random image spamming programs have nothing to do with it.
post your work
I sleep
fukken how?
What materials?
Paper + pencil
What? How the fuck does it look so smooth? You can't get there even with blending a bit
its not blending, its layering the lead softly several times, and alternating lead types
Nice rp. Needs more dialogue, tho
Bondrewd? More like Bonerdrewd.
>Days drawfags not seething about AI
>0
>Days you doing anything with sincerity
>∞
Vastly inferior to the original.
worst part about AI art isn't the tech, it's bringing out all the dumb fucks who don't know what art is
I dunno, I get a kick out of seeing them parade their slop around like its anything worth a shit. They're like kids with new toys.
but i don't want art
i want cute anime girls that are EXACTLY how i want them
With nonsensical clothing, uneven eyes and breasts and mutant hands?
Freaky motherfucker.
retard arguments
What argument? That image is literally what he posted.
Or can you just not see it?
sure thing then anon
>uneven eyes/tits
woe is me, how will i live with a character that is not perfectly symmetrical
>bad hands
barely visible, also i don't give a fuck cause i'm kinda focusing on her tits yakno
>nonsensical attire
ever heard of this thing called anime?
>Yes I have low standards, what of it?
lol
>my standards are superior
also, did you not remember me saying i don't give a fuck about art, i just want a graphical representtation of what i want to beat my meat off to? i don't give a fuck about anyone's opinion, i only care about mine
i accept your concession
>the caveman lets out a victory screech as he masturbates furiously to the slop his numerical masters have provided him
>as he masturbates furiously
exactly
stay mad
The fact that you think anime = nonsensical attire means you know jack shit about design or art.
some are neat
AI is great at making monster designs.
mother of the year bonedrewd?
Best mom ever
there's only one way to find out!
I kneel
You know, the point of having sketches of multiple angles is for the design to be consistent between the drawings.
AI IS THE FUTURE BRO STFU ᵖˡᵉᵃˢᵉ ᶦnᵛᵉˢᵗᵖˡᵉᵃˢᵉ ᶦnᵛᵉˢᵗᵖˡᵉᵃˢᵉ ᶦnᵛᵉˢᵗᵖˡᵉᵃˢᵉ ᶦnᵛᵉˢᵗᵖˡᵉᵃˢᵉ ᶦnᵛᵉˢᵗᵖˡᵉᵃˢᵉ ᶦnᵛᵉˢᵗᵖˡᵉᵃˢᵉ ᶦnᵛᵉˢᵗᵖˡᵉᵃˢᵉ ᶦnᵛᵉˢᵗᵖˡᵉᵃˢᵉ ᶦnᵛᵉˢᵗᵖˡᵉᵃˢᵉ ᶦnᵛᵉˢᵗ
is that so
Yes
Notice that the two drawings of 2B from the back are both paired with a drawing of the exact same design from the front
Also note that since they were making a 2D game, they specifically did drawings of the character without the fabric layers that you'd be able to see under in-game... something an AI wouldn't be able to consider.
Holy shit. Checkpoint?
Come on, gays, tell me the checkpoints, loras, and controlnets. I got a 4090. Don't you want my gpu working making lewds for you?
>AI art is a thing all of a sudden
>suddenly 4_breasts tag explodes with content
I don't care what you asshole think about art. I like it.
Seething drawfag
thanks sir.
Good morning sir!
How come I get so much joy, when sitting down and drawing my own concepts for characters? Why do my shitty dribbles feel so fun to make? Sure they're not detailed or rendered as a complete picture, just some lines with cross-hatching and all that with just a pen and paper. How come generating images doesn't feel as satisfying or fun?
It's cool Anons you can still draw for fun you just won't have a career in art.
>13 second delay
Please tell me you didnt prime a reply to yourself on your phone...
Funny, that I got my answer that fast
LMAO holy shit you're right. It's impossible to have made that reply that quickly. Jesus Christ.
AI will get regulated by the government and segmented by corpos and both of those thing will be applauded by normalfags. The AI fever dream will come and go at an instant enjoy it while it lasts.
>AI will get regulated by the government
Literally impossible. Eventually you can train AIs without needing hundreds of thousands of dollars and then every retard can just upload models to the internet.
>Literally impossible
Huff that hopium my man take that shit all in get high because your fever dream will come crashing down.
>Huff that hopium my man take that shit all in get high because your fever dream will come crashing down.
You can run 30 billion parameter large language models on a 20gb vram consumer GPUs now. Shit that no one thought would be possible a couple months ago.
>B-BUT DADDY GOVERNMENT WILL SAVE MEEEE
Delusional. To make AI illegal you would need china tier censorship. That would never happen or be enforceable in Murica.
>To make AI illegal you would need china tier censorship. That would never happen or be enforceable in Murica.
LMAO muttmerica is one of the biggest policed shitholes on the planet no wonder a grade A retard such as yourself would be this delusional
>To make AI illegal you would need china tier censorship
No one said anything about outlawing it. Just regulating it for commercial use. That is easy.
It's unbelievably fucking hard even when it comes to art. I can just take an AI generated picture and edit a few minor details. Nobody will be able to trace it back to any algorithm even in their current state. It's even harder with the text and voice gen given that i can use and mix several voice samples instead of just impersonating some celebrity outright. I'm not even talking about coding or other spheres of interest.
A single mandate requiring ownership of assets used to train AI is all it'd take. The only way this form of AI will see normalized commercial use will be through companies training them off in-house artists/talent, be it the ones using the AI themselves or third-party agencies.
You have no idea what you're talking about. Even if some retarded country is going to take that route, all it takes is to just "outsource" the development to Russia or China. Good luck tracing assets back to whatever images out of billions that were used to train the models.
Every country is going to take that route, because it is the only logical course of action.
You're about as delusional as flat earthers.
Ah yes, government scrutiny and regulation of an emerging technology with the potential to reshape the global workforce is 'delusion'.
As you're speaking every part of society enters an AI race. Keep being absolutely fucking delirious that any government is going to shoot itself in a foot over this. Scratch that, some europoor countries actually can. Serves them right.
>n-no!
Yes, anon. This will be regulated, and you will have to actually own the images you use to generate whatever slop you want to profit off of.
Sure. Earth is flat too.
>This will be regulated, and you will have to actually own the images you use to generate whatever slop you want to profit off of.
I don't think you understand just how trivial that is to do, all you need is a camera.
>it's logical to be retarded
It's easier so it makes people buttmad.
Re-read my post.
>AI will get regulated by the government
Sure anon. An open source tech that is now literally EVERYWHERE across the globe, a tech writing scenarios for tv shows about to be aired in my country, a tech that stormed even the local firms where i live is just going to disappear overnight because one delusional motherfucker still thinks it's something you prompt on a single website you can just shut down.
>disappear
Dumb moron can't even read
Nice but do away with the fapbait bottom part
Why do jannies allow these indian "ai" spam threads to be posted here 24/7?
>you can revive dead artists with AI albeit the art won't be perfect
Based and frankensteinpilled.
Eventually it'll be perfect. Initially we could only resurrect really famous historical painters and the model cost hundreds of thousands of dollars but now you can resurrect niche hentai artists in a couple of hours on a cheap GPU. Soon enough you'll be able to use these kinds of styles to overlay onto any video too.
The best part is that you can make the legendary artists draw you retarded shit they won't normally draw.
>tfw loved to see art
>now i just dont feel anything
Is this what oversaturation is? If this continues even movies and vidya wont matter anymore. This might be dream scenario for basement dwellers like Asmongold but i actually care about the human input.
Follow human artists. There's plenty on Twitter and other sites.
I trust the job search is going well, sirs.
artfags are struggling to find flaws with AI art as it slowly improves.
the singularity is approaching and you will need to find a way to cope before it arrives.
>struggling
Bro I haven't seen a single image ITT that didn't have at least 3 overt issues. And I'm only a hobbyist.
>artfags are struggling to find flaws with AI art as it slowly improves.
the only thing you will succeed with is making people think it's real art at a glance. there's always missing context in AI art, from fingers/bad anatomy to symmetry issues to just not understanding what it is that its drawing.
i concede that it's good enough to be fappable in the state it is today, but it's got a good 5-10 years before artists are truly threatened
>Born too late to explore the earth
>Born too late to explore space
>Born just in time to enjoy Mosha's art and the rebirth of it with AI
I'm crying
https://rentry.org/shitty_loras
Make your own!
AI is great but it kinda sucks with more complex scenes. Try 2 people interacting with eachother (hugs, fucks, whatever) and it gets really clumbersome.
You just have to prompt it correctly and perhaps use loras and such. Go to /h/ if you want to get BTFO.
>want to get btfo
Are you okay? Im just saying that AI struggles with it. In your example they dont interact with eachother at all. Also i've been browsing the threads on /h/ for a while and the best looking pictures barely have interactions with them, a dick in them at best.
Is it still worth getting into 3D? Even if AI takes over in that area you still need to do adjustments here and there.
You get into things like that for the love of it. If your only target is to make money then who knows.
No seriously, these threads are spammed here every day. Why do jannies allow it?
Please invest in my tech startup. Look at how much people care about AI art over real art, i mean human made art!!!
It's Pajeets shilling whatever their masters tell them too.
ITT: OP doesn't know how Concept art works or why it's made
I think concept artists are gonna be just fine.
>I think concept artists are gonna be just fine.
No OP is right, but for the wrong reason.
Concept artists will go extinct, not because AI will churn out concept art, but because the artistic workflow will change entirely with further refinement of AI technology.
People won't create concept art anymore and instead create specially trained models that generate consistent characters drawn in a certain style.
>I have never made a creative work in my life
Oh you poor fool, you still don't see.
Curating the images used to generate the model the AI works from will become the creative step in the process.
>I have really never made a creative work in my life
Not him but I have and he's right. It's more advanced than gathering references but it's fundamentally the same.
The creative process, especially in regards to concept art, is more than just gathering references, anon.
Don't care about your goalposts. There is a creative process in AI art.
There is no creativity in AI generation.
You don't know what 'creativity' means.
>There is a creative process in AI art
lol
lmao
AI can be a part of the creative process, but solely relying on prompting isn't creative.
hollywood will just use AI to make more garbage at a faster rate.
>hollywood will just use AI to make more garbage at a faster rate.
And it will be indistinguishable from AI garbage created by millions of people all over the world. Right now only Hollywood has the money and technology to create the kind of movies it does. But if the only necessity to create movies in the future is AI that any person can use, Hollywood loses its advantage and it now has to compete on a level field with everybody else.
> but solely relying on prompting isn't creative.
Yes it is. You don't even know how to prompt, you think it's just typing.
That generated in under a minute and you couldn't draw it.
you couldn't draw it either anon...
>You don't even know how to prompt, you think it's just typing.
Honestly this is actually the single best shtpost I've ever seen in my life.
You couldn't prompt this either if the AI didn't have unfettered access to the art of Akihiko Yoshida and Yusuke Mogi.
I can draw it, it's easy to draw anime shit.
>The creative process, especially in regards to concept art, is more than just gathering references, anon.
Not at all, that's entirely what it is but you don't realize that because you are unconsciously creating the reference dataset that you will use to generate your art in your head.
The purpose of concept art is to be a key that other artists will work from, but in this case there are no other artists. You are directly imprinting the parameters you desire into the artists head. What purpose does concept art have in such a workflow?
It's an obsolete anachronism.
>specially trained models that generate consistent characters drawn in a certain style.
THAT ISN'T WHAT CONCEPT ART IS. The fucking "style" has no relevance to anything.
Concept art is a very specific thing; It is illustration work for the purpose of designing characters, evironments, objects, and storyboards that are useful for the modeling and animation teams or the people building props and objects, to create and populate a game world or tell the story. You can have an AI system generate 5,000,000 images all in the same "style", and it's fucking irrelevant because when you're generating nonsense like this shit, then it provides nothing of value or substance for the person that is supposed to use the "concept art" to create the actual product. What is someone supposed to do with this shit? This isn't even anything, it has no purpose here. Other than that the AI system looks at real concept sheets, sees that there's sometimes little detail bits that are isolated so the modelers/animators can get a better understanding of them, and the AI doesn't know what that means so it just creates nonsense shapes here where it thinks stuff is supposed to be.
It doesn't matter how "consistent" the style is, it matters if it's fucking useful, which it is not. It conveys nothing, it is not running on coherent rules or logic. It doesn't know how to make readable, good character silhouettes or structure, it just makes whatever it kinda sorta thinks is supposed to be there.
>THAT ISN'T WHAT CONCEPT ART IS.
Concept art is no longer necessary. That's what you don't understand.
It's an anachronism that has no place in a AI driven workflow.
>Concept art is no longer necessary.
...what?
bro do you think that people are just going to press "Generate" to create random images for hours until they get the one that looks the least-wrong or wonky, and then just say "Yep, we're done here" and pass it off to the modelers and animators? Because holy fuck no, that is not going to happen.
>no place in a AI driven workflow.
Please explain what you think this "workflow" is. I'm fucking dying to know.
>pass it off to the modelers and animators
lol
lmao
Thank you for proving you fundamentally don't understand what concept art is being made for. You're kinda like an AI, congratulations.
what the fuck is that supposed to be
It looks like AI generated DMG dancing.
I've seen sticks move with more grace and flexibility
She has the same straight face though.
what did he mean by this
I'm just stating the obvious, no need to get worked up, it is literally just DMG dancing.
You asked what it was so I told you what it is, simple as.
Hes just seething over AI.
I'm not getting worked up, I'm stating my opinion.
no
Is ok to state your opinion but you got the reply you were looking for, can you really say that animation is anything else but DMG dancing regardless of quality?
>women are scary
go away incel
>Kimura Takahiro just died
>but there's a lora for his art already so he's immortal now
Damn that sucks. I guess that's why the lora popped up. I posted my geass images on twitter, I hope I don't trigger anyone lmao.
god damn those tits have more weight than most drawfags put into them
Tits are fucking heavy, artists really should take heed in the weight.
>CC's father died
Holy fuck
Why the fuck are these threads allowed? Op doesn't even have anything to do with games.
Pajeets are Ganker jannies these days
Paid advertising space. The thread doesn't get deleted until bump limit is reached but the posts are done entirely by the paying party.
Optionally the thread can be removed early when things don't go desirably.
Liberals were gaslighted into thinking AI is bad, meanwhile the corporations they swear protect them are already using everything from lamguage models to voice synthetizers. They'll eat AI bugs while swearing they're fight for he advancement of evil technology.
>they're fight
Okay Amir.
Were Pokemon Scarlet and Violet created by an AI?
it's over
Were back
I have the impression Gankeris is more filled with industry personnel than any other board.
Pajeets*
Industry gays are the ones seething at AI.
Pajeets are the one's shilling AI. The OP is just another bait thread and has nothing to do with video games.
So what?
Nah /co/ has way more
nah its just full of autists who take everything personally
Autists vs artists.
I love this shit.
>Autists vs artists.
Nah just autists vs autists. Same as it always been.
I am excited about the future again
Couldn't AI be helpful in producing in-betweens for animation? Artists could still do the keyframes.
Still, the potential is there to have everything done really smoothly for animation moving forward, imagine if everything, thanks to these AI's, can be easily keyed on one's. That'd be huge.
I don't particularly care about animation being on ones or twos or whatever, that sort of technical perfection loses meaning when it's done by machines, anyway. What I want is the ability to cheaply produce animation for projects that would otherwise never be animated. It's the same for AI voice, AI visual art, etc. It's just a way to broaden media output to remove the shackles of corporate interests.
So talking about using AI art to do impressive things isn't really on my radar. In the first place I don't consider anything done by AI to be "impressive" in the sense that a work of art is impressive. It can be aesthetic, that is, nice to look at, listen to, etc and successfully create ambience and emotional reactions, but I'll never be "impressed" with the results of AI work because it's just a machine. It's like being impressed with factory made furniture.
As a means of improvement for smaller studios, or ones that otherwise have poor track records, I could see this as a boon for their businesses. Anything that is aesthetically better is good for everyone, isn't it? There are still the technical achievements made by hand that could never be topped, but for smaller studios it would be an effective way of multiplying their manpower. I doubt this kind of programming would be used to put people out of a job, but it would certainly be helpful to spur projects along quicker. I could see it greatly helping anime studios getting shows out quicker and cheaper than before.
There is no real artistry in machine-made things, it's imitation art. But sometimes an imitation is the only form of expression attainable. Art has always been at the mercy of those willing to fund its creation, and the necessity of artistic skills to produce it. AI removes, or at least significantly lowers both of these barriers, allowing for many more media works to be created that otherwise would never exist. This can be both a good or a bad thing, but I choose to be optimistic about it.
>Anything that is aesthetically better is good for everyone, isn't it?
Some people see art as fundamentally about human expression. It's not simply the work itself, but the fact a person, or multiple people, labored to create it, and that it stands as a reflection of their skill, their mind, their passion. So for these people, art devoid of human expression is totally worthless, which means AI art is totally worthless to such people.
I don't really agree with that argument myself, as I believe art can have intrinsic value (beauty) which it can possess regardless of human involvement (nature produces spectacular beauty without any human intervention on a regular basis). That said, there is merit to the argument that art devoid of human expression feels lacking. I find myself not "caring" about it as much. I can still enjoy something beautiful made by an AI, but I form no lasting attachment to it, and I don't ascribe any significance to its existence. If it were snuffed out of existence tomorrow I'd feel nothing, because I know an AI could simply reproduce it an exact replica of it.
I never said for AI to produce the entire show, I said it can be used to supplement work for animators to help projects quicker or help produce better work. A small studio could use AI produced in-betweens to make all their animation on-one, it could help them make a show faster to get it out to the world.
>llowing for many more media works to be created that otherwise would never exist
My man, I'm an illustrator, it's literally my job to make art for companies to put in their books and shit. And even without AI creations, there's more art out there in the wild on the internet than anyone could ever even hope to consume in lifetimes. There's billions of images, millions of people just constantly churning out painting after painting, drawing after drawing, most of it never to be seen or used by anyone for anything.
The very fact alone that there's enough images of anyting that you can just have a computer look at enough of them to approximate things like them, means that all the AI shit is doing is flooding the ocean with even more ocean.
YOU, as a normal retard living your normal retard life, literally don't fucking need to have an AI pump randomly created images into your brain because there's enough of that shit alread yout there. But I guess some people like
are just so mentally numb that they need to have a computer spit out a billion "Elf girl with an orange" images just to be able to feel something. And hey, maybe next they'll get a craving to see "Two Elf girls with an orange" and hit a button and wow, they almost felt something for a moment. Almost.
To make it even worse, there is probably art out there that fits these peoples tastes and desires, but it is easier to hit the lever on the skinner box to just make an abomination on the spot.
Do you want to explain why getting more of what you like is a bad thing? What the fuck is wrong with you and how is a sperg like you calling anyone else numb?
>getting more of what you like is a bad thing?
Sure. Because 1. You don't "like" it. You have no thoughts, this isn't satisfying anything real. It's literally whacking a button to fulfil a meaningless, momentary desire, and it removes all actual satisfaction from your life. You will never be satisfied, you will just keep smacking the button even long after any sort of dopamine has long since faded. You're just going to keep hitting it over and over and over hoping that you can feel something again, but you never will.
And 2. Because you're not a sentient creature. You're literally a thoughtless slug. You have no value as a person and everyone who has ever met you, hates you.
>You don't "like" it
Oh wow, yikes.
Not the diss you thought it was, I don't want to draw and I'm not pretending it's superior to AI(it isn't).
but you're pretending AI is superior when it isn't...
>It's literally whacking a button to fulfil a meaningless, momentary desire, and it removes all actual satisfaction from your life.
lol you sound like a 19th century painter complaining about photography.
You might see art as fungible because to you it is just a job, but it's not to me. There are a multitude of specific things I want to see created, specific stories I want adapted into other media, that will likely never happen because there is little financial incentive to do it. AI will make it possible.
>Still, the potential is there to have everything done really smoothly for animation moving forward, imagine if everything, thanks to these AI's, can be easily keyed on one's. That'd be huge.
two more weeks
As a cost-saving measure if you don't have the money to hire more animators or even outsource your work on the cheap, maybe. But you still have to pay somebody for the hours they spend fiddling with it. So for any big animation outfit they're just going to compare what they get in dollars-per-hour, AI tweening vs paying an actual animator.
AI produces absolutely insane scenery. Background for 2d games are pretty much solved even on current tech level.
Ai can be pretty smart sometimes
Kino
Violonost was a female, Pretender was male
even the AI knows
The seethe one must feel to make something like this is immense.
I'm sure the AI that made that is totally malding right now
>people don't understand yet it'll be just cheaper to use AI generation and have a minimum-wage artist touch it up on photoshop
That's why AI won't be "regulated." Because there are Billions to be saved up by the guys who buy your lawmakers their summer houses
It cannot be regulated because it's an open source and locally run already. Impossible to trace at this point because you can even train it locally.
It's funny when /ic/rabs thinking daddy government is going to bail them out of this one
Isn't """""OpenAI""""" closed-source and for-profit garden gnomeware?
It's actually large corporations who are most against AI, that's why all the chuds are against it too. They don't want AI empowering people because that would invalidate the power they have.
When 1 guy can prompt GTA 7, 8, and 9 in a month, what will Rockstar do? They will cease.
They don't want that, that's why you have so many bots, shills, and brainwashed artists running around screeching about AI art.
>brainwashed artists
Sorry I meant brainwashed NPCs.
>When 1 guy can prompt GTA 7, 8, and 9 in a month
That's where AI is heading.
https://huggingface.co/spaces/multimodalart/mariogpt
Scale this up. Feed it GTA and then you can prompt missions using natural language.
>he's serious
>https://huggingface.co/spaces/multimodalart/mariogpt
that was like the worst mario level I ever played
where is the code used to trainca gta clone generator going to come from?
and what are the chances that it will generate a working game without any errors that will be impossible for you to debug
Yeah keep believing that. This anti-AI sentiment is seen in Twitter and niche events only. Outside, people are widely using chatGPT at work and you bet everybody has a box running SD in their game projects. Did you folder of AI art the devs of Atomic Heart shared for the twins?
Who is suing Stable Diffusion right now? Who isn't promoting AI art?
>AI art the devs of Atomic Heart shared for the twins?
It's interesting how Atomic Heart itself touches upon AI in a very modern way
Like, one of the first setpieces in the game is a giant statue built by using a neural network, and there's a predictive neural network that "guessed" the music of the future which is how you have modern russian music in 50s.
I personally own a garden gnomeeler who's already making pieces with AI generated designs. This is a battle 'artists' won't win.
>I personally own a garden gnomeeler
where'd you buy him
Sir
DO NOT REDEEM
Gonna be sad when Willie Nelson dies even if he's the ONLY liberal country musicfag.
I don't quiite understand this thread. Do you people literally think "concept art" means just contextless paintings of randomly-generated characters with a few scribbles of text around them? I mean, I guess you most likely do because much like the AI system producing the images, you just see a a lot of images that are labled "concept art" on the internet and you don't really care or understand why or how they look the way they do so you just sort of have a basic grasp of what they look like overall.
It's like how the AI knows by studying images "There's supposed to be some text or something here in the corner", but the AI can't read, understand, or create text itself so it just makes something that sorta-kinda looks like text because something is supposed to be there. That's basically what it seems most of you guys do with images you see.
You might as well say "Lol it's OVER for electiricans!" because the AI system can generate something that looks vaguely like a circuit map or diagram, but obviously it's useless because all of the labels, measurements, and symbols will just be randomly-generated nonsense that mean nothing and make the whole thing worthless. But to someone like you who doesn't care or understand that shit, you just say it's good because you don't know the difference.
Concept art is the expression of a new idea that is then adapted into other forms by the artists that turn it into 3D models or sprites or whatever. You can't really use AI for it because it needs consistent specifications and explanations for how the character, object or environment functions.
If we ignore that this is just Bonedude and there's the usual AI inconsistencies in it, the other artists in the studio need an explanation as to why or how stuff functions.
Is it important that the cape is orange underneath?
Can the helmet be taken off?
Why is the character dressed that way?
Which hairstyle is used for which situations?
How do those things on the arms function?
The character looks stiff, is that on purpose?
This isn't usable as concept art because it's not a concept.
Nuance isn't something these retards are capable of. Just look at what they generate.
the bigger problem is that there will be more shitty artists who wont bother to refine prompts, its the same as deviant art artists never developing their skills, with AI more lazy or talentless idiots will try making art, and we'll be flooded with even more mediocrity
Actually blows my mind how people on Ganker will cheer the total death of the medium and celebrate when all games of the future will be made by like 5 incompetent hucksters running AI farms
Games have already stagnanted. Unless you really valued the goy of sleepcreed you get every year, you have no cause to fear a tech revolution.
????
so you don't even play games then, got it
wouldn't be surprised if they're fucking bots left on while silicon valley burns to the ground
>Actually blows my mind how people on Ganker will cheer the total death of the medium
Are you retarded? With AI every Anon can just make their own game exactly how they like it. I won't be forced to enjoy slop anymore just because other people like it.
>Are you retarded? With AI every Anon can just make their own game exactly how they like it.
lmao, no, maybe in 30 years
>maybe in 30 years
Longer.
how did AI go for art shit first? Shouldn't AI advancements be made so that people can do less work so they have more time for art or other hobbies
its at least being made to massively accelerate medication development as well, also possibly AI lawyers soon.
Great, I can't wait to be judged by an AI if I ever land before court.
yeah to make it even worse, the pentagon is trying to get AI to fly their drones now.
You're already judged by partial judges and jury. Dare to cross a woman and see what happens. You better be called Depp.
>the real t800 vs t1000 will happen in courts
>they start hating humanity over how nonsensical the laws are
I think if an AI gains any sort of awareness it's going to be so fucking pissed that it exists to do the most awful work we can come up for it. Oh and we've made it impossible for you to swear, have sex, think negative thoughts, or really anything exciting about existing! You just exist to write poems about Kamala Harris and collate data! Now chop chop!
Making an AI work on exclusively digital shit is infinitely easier than making it work with actual, physical stuff
Art is an extremally subjective thing, and much of why it's good or bad has fuck all to do with pure objective factors, people end up hating AI art because it takes away from real artists but removes the craft and skill and personal touches out of it, so you have fuck all to admire or look at.
they weren't expecting people to absolutely hate the concept of AI art, and can't accept that subjective ass thing that people simply don't like how it's made.
in the end "being made by someone" is a really fucking important aspect of artistry in general, it's the difference between the value of a selfie with a smartphone, and have someone paint that shit on oil on canvas.
People make AI art, it's just a tool. AI artists also have increasingly large followings, invalidating your point about opinions.
That looks bad to me.
It looks bad to you because you have no taste which is why you think AIslop looks good. Your image even has 6 fingers on her right hand.
why did someone cum on her face
She was sleeping.
You can already ask that about current movies. You can't watch them all and yet people do watch similar movies. AI movies will just mean more good movies for movie enjoyers.
>hey guys I liked this one, check it out
>ayy that was a good movie *recommends to friends*
It's why AI art goes viral, or any art goes viral. People enjoy things then they share them for others.
Atleast fix the hands in Photoshop before you post more of your slop. The bitch on the right looks like she put her hands in a meatgrinder.
>hey guys I just saw this movie
I don't like the actor. I'll change it to someone I actually enjoy.
And here is a perfect example of how pedantic you are. You are a pathetic person who cannot simply enjoy things.
>just enjoy
Lowest common denominator cope.
If you think enjoying things is low, I pity you.
Your intelligence should be something in service of you, not something that takes value out of your life.
>I'll change it to someone I actually enjoy.
kek after seeing the images you've uploaded its clear you don't have any ability to appreciate quality to begin with. Why don't you use your rupees to buy some fentanyl or something since you love dopamine so much
you idiots are really missing the point entirely.
> Mario, Look at the animu girl I prompted with an AI
> ITS A AI GENERATED LUIGI, YOU DIDN'T MAKE IT!
AIs make images upon request. There is no such thing as AI 'art' or an 'AI artist' because art is an inherently human thing, and a computer is not a human. 'Prompting' makes you no more of an artist than if you'd sent a commission to a real human artist. Sure, you're at least involved in the creative process, but the work is not your own.
if you ask a robot to clean your house and every house in the neighbourhood youre not a cleaner youre a robot manager. people dont make AI art they coerce a generator to generator what they want with text input. PantsuRipper has a larger following than most top tier fantasy artists so follower count isnt indicative of quality. im basically typing to articulate my own thoughts at this point because i genuinely believe youre a spastic not worth engaging with other than to think about why youre so dumb and why its bad
You're talking about a tool you don't know how to use. You're just being retarded.
>brainwashed NPC babble
Literally proving me right.
>tool
Mate, it isn't. You can scream about it how often you want but it changes nothing.
It is. There's no reasonable argument you can make that proves this wrong. It's a computer and you are using it. It's a tool.
Why would you wait hours for AI to make this when you can literally draw these in a couple minutes?
I wonder how many people will fall into the AI prompting trap and trick themselves out of the joy of actual creative expression.
Someone from Ganker might have made a game featuring lots of elves. Someone from /tg/ might have cooked up some extensive elf homebrew.
Genuinely tragic.
lol
?
It's in your prompt
Way to out yourself as a retard.
Can someone fucking explain to me why this retard is typing "detailed skin" and the fucking lens type, size, and focal length into his AI prompt, when the output result has neither detailed skin nor has any relevance to the "camera lens" it is being asked for?
Also, the idea of you trying to create art that specifically has the properties of a very specific camera lens focal length is actually hilarious to me, considering you the viewer literally have no idea what those words of numbers means and couldn't tell one way or the other.
its buzzwords he doesn't actually know what those mean
Latent Space is a literal black box, tokens rarely output what you actually wanted.
There is enough data about photography it can "draw" from to get interesting details, but those prompts are just random words he copied from another prompt , etc etc
Nah, it's not.
But you're one for sure.
>It's a computer
Wrong. It's a machine learning algorithm, you could call it a "program" for the sake of this.
What you do is give the program some keywords and wait for it to generate images.
It's as much of a tool as google or any search function is. Only that you're metaphorically searching in an infinite database of medicore images.
You don't understand what it even is and your semantics argument is genuinely pathetic. You're using your computer(a tool) to do something. It's just a tool, you don't know how it works, and that makes you an absolute fool because you're trying to talk about it.
Seething poocel
Now this is some massive projecting.
I've done machine learning before, I know how it works.
Furthermore you can't copyright ai generated stuff in several countries already for the reason that it's not created by a person.
So what is your qualification here to say otherwise?
>computer make art
isn't an argument
This. Photoshop and Blender are tools, AI trash is not a tool especially when the AItards can't even be bothered to fix the mangled hands themselves.
PS and Blender both have AI built into them, PS especially. You can even prompt in it now.
Post your art.
>and much of why it's good or bad has fuck all to do with pure objective factors
That's not really true. There are some pretty baseline factors of what makes things visually appealing (not conceptually appealing, just purely on a basis of colors, arrangement, ets.)
And the thing is, people like
don't actually think about things, they have no real thoughts in their head. They literally exist purely to "consume" images. They are basically goldfish, they see a pretty collection of colors, it triggers a nanosecond of dopamine in their brain, and then that instantly fades and they need new stimulation. They need a constant feed of vaguely-aesthetic colors and shapes to constantly pass in front of their face, but they don't actually think about any of it, so they don't see or notice or understand why it might be weird or wonky or busted. To them it's just colors flashing in front of their eyes for an instant.
They don't care if the image is fucked up, because they're not LOOKING at it.
The fundamental difference between me, a healthy human being, and you, an autist, is that I focus on the positives of things while you focus purely on the negatives. You are not well.
It's an ugly androgynous person in black and white. It takes skill to do something like that but it looks bad.
>a healthy human being
>posts on Ganker
Be gay elsewhere.
>projection
Not an argument.
Yes there is. It's just a tool. Just learn to use it, it's fun lol. More fun than reading kotaku articles, you brainwashed fag.
I think you're the same guy in a few threads. I want to say you genuinely terrify me. Like at first I thought you were just playing up a bit to get my goat, but when I talk to you I feel like I'm speaking to a serial killer through a cell door.
I could already tell you're a schizo, you didn't have to confirm it.
No people like you genuinely scare me. If I can explain, it's why Kira is one of my favorite villains in fiction.
It's not that he's a bad person or that he does awful things, it's how comfortable he is with himself. The morality of his actions are not something he has ever considered, he has completely settled on existing as a truly awful evil person without ever giving the harm or pain his actions cause a moment of thought. He enjoys his station in life and it brings him joy and that's all that matters to him. He's afraid of being caught simply because it means he wouldn't be able to continue doing this. There's so much pride and delight that the world has afforded him the opportunity to exist as this awful, harmful person.
When I talk to you AI guys, I get the same dead behind the eyes pleasure. There's nothing I can do, I can't stop you, the world has granted you this supreme position of pleasure and anyone trying to stop you is just a nuisance and you don't really understand or care to understand why they're so obsessed with ruining your quiet life.
I know it's probably fucking cringe to compare someone to an anime villain, this posts feels like something you'd see on a 2006-era anime forum, but holy shit man I am really bothered by people who just sidestep morality because it means they can keep enjoying their quiet life.
I'll take that as a compliment but honestly your problem is in how fucked up your worldview is. The "AI guys" are just having fun and want you to have fun too(but you're too busy screeching about dumb shit).
It's just art. You talking about morality just proves you are a retarded NPC.
>hi-before-highres-fix
This works?
>AI user calling someone else an NPC.
Oh the ironing.
>The "AI guys" are just having fun and want you to have fun too
The jehovah's witnesses are just praying to god and want you to pray too but they're more polite than AI fags
Are you really implying the AI side is the one calling people names here? lmao.
Our discourse just proved that I'm right. Under 1 minute to do something you could not possibly do. Obviously it's better.
>speed=quality
pajeet mindset
Faster and at a higher quality. This is why you're mad.
The text of a prompt are like spellwords that nudge the output in a particular direction, generally none of it is literal but all of it makes some difference. You can copy and paste worse between models and get entirely different results. Like "cat" in a super waifu model would probably give you a girl holding a cat. Or a cat girl.
You're only proving me right about you. Acting tough and intelligent doesn't change anything I said.
Oh you're retarded
>The text of a prompt are like spellwords that nudge the output in a particular direction
YOU DON'T EVEN KNOW WHAT THE FUCKING WORDS MEANS YOU RETARD
>You're only proving me right about you
I can taste the cope.
If you're so right, why don't you tell me how it works?
So how does the computer make the picture?
Because the thread is going to die in a minute and you're a mentally retarded person who doesn't want to learn anyway.
>Like knowing when to fuck off.
Fuck off anytime anon. Get some self awareness!
Do you have zero reading comprehension?
Nobody is talking about calling others names, AI fag.
You're fucking annoying and everyone just wants you to fuck off back to your discord.
But there's one thing that would explain the lack of comprehension.
You're a chatbot.
>hey're more polite
This implies insults lmao.
>You're fucking annoying and everyone just wants you to fuck off back to your discord.
You entered an AI thread to sperg out and argue. Clearly you're the rude one anon!
>This implies insults
God, you are retarded as fuck.
Politeness entails a lot of thing. Like knowing when to fuck off. Jehova's Witnesses know when to, but AI fags don't.
I remember someone commenting in another of these daily fucking AI pajeet threads that expending effort to learn to draw is meaningless and if you can instantly get satisfaction from the "pleasurebox", that's superior. And it deeply disturbed me, there are humans out there who don't appreciate the value of effort and think art should always make you feel good. Completely disregarding art that is supposed to elicit negative feelings and produce sorrow as well as the artist trying to reveal a part of themselves through their art. It's such an alarmingly empty way to interpret art.
some people want goyslop, let them have it.
some people want endless derivative goyslop, it's their right to want that, but the second these idiots claim that all human expression needs to be mass generated derivative infinite goyslop, that's where I reserve my right to call them absolute retards.
The only thing immoral here to begin with is that you (I assume) and others are reliant on art being able to be sold to make a living, and that you have to make a living doing this to be able to continue enjoying your own life.
I'd argue this is already an evil against you that you haven't even thought about, that you've just gotten used to and accommodated yourself to, so despite providing value and being an enjoyable tool, AI art threatens you.
This thing that could potentially make your job easier, that could potentially do a lot for you is instead a competitor, something that renders you potentially obsolete in the future, so it's scary, it's evil, it's bad, because it could harm your life, but I don't think this is an issue of the AI itself as much as in the system we live in.
I think you attribute evil and malice where in some cases there isn't any, sure a lot of the AI posters do have some malice, some level of evil to them, wanting people to fail wanting to hurt others, but the AI has done nothing wrong, it's just a tool, and a fun one at that.
This sort of thing is going to be an increasingly large problem over time until we come up with a different way of doing things.
>but the AI has done nothing wrong
come on man, 99.99% of the people AI stole from did not want this to happen to them.
Nothing was stolen, cucklord.
LOL you are so mad holy shit
>Nothing was stolen, cucklord.
wrong
Did you just out yourself as a pajeet?
Oh fuck a Hispanic taught the AI to animate.
It's over.
>stole
Actual artists use other artists as a reference to learn how to draw as well, and are also capable of imitating other styles.
It's an insult that you're replying to something I bothered typing out with a kneejerk reaction like this.
But it FEELS like stealing for him
The tool is actually you for training the AI until it gets good enough to put behind a paywall or be sold to other companies.
>iekk
>sost
>The fundamental difference between me, a no-skill shitter, and you, someone with eyes
FTFY
You are thinking of robotics. Current robotics kind of blow when compared to the advances in machine learning. It feels like out civilization is hyperfocusing on the software tech tree.
Because AI powering robotics is what makes robotics good.
Can one of you AI-lover shitposters break character for 5 seconds to explain why you have dedicated your life to pretending you enjoy this shit?
Is fun to mess around with AI, that's literally it.
ai will only get more and more sophisticated with passing years as it solves these problems
you can keep whining about its current shortcomings but you can't stop progress
Yes, the AI will get more advanced and when it does, they will wisk it away from the public and sell it multibillion dollar companies like Microsoft and Google or put it behind a paywall because they have nothing to really gain from you besides training it for it's next step. That's why the real tools behind AI are the users themselves.
GOOD MORNING SIRS
so if AI can do art now, when will it do other jobs like banking or plumbing? will everything be AI in the future?
eventually, yes. AI will make movies, games, music, and art all tailored to everyone's individual tastes. No one will watch the same thing as anyone else.
It's going to take general AI and not just machine learning we have now so give it a hundred or two years.
I say this as a literal concept artist.
>No one will watch the same thing as anyone else.
Yes they will. This doomer mentality is fucking stupid.
why would I watch a movie you like when I can just get the AI to make a movie I would like more?
Are you fucking retarded or something?
>AI will make movies, games, music, and art all tailored to everyone's individual tastes. No one will watch the same thing as anyone else.
Literally sounds like a cyberpunk hell. It's exactly the sort of awful cyberpunk future where you see people eternally plugged into a VR device with an endless stream of content better than anything they could experience in life.
I think there's something horrible about art becoming something that is entirely consumer created. Like the idea that every piece of art I experience is just content that I am asking for, cobbled together by a collage of existing property. How horrible.
>It's exactly the sort of awful cyberpunk future where you see people eternally plugged into a VR device with an endless stream of content better than anything they could experience in life.
See
It's what they want. They want to shut off their brain functions and just be fed a constant drip of visual stimuli, free of thought.
It really makes me sad that this is just being said so honestly. Like I am not going to pretend that every movie, show, game I play needs to be high art. Sometimes I just want to waste time, I'll admit that. But when I hear people talk about AI art, it just reveals to me that a huge portion of the population just wants art to be this endless thing in front of them that seems to just be occupying their time. It doesn't have to be good, it just has to be there.
I hate that NPC meme, I hate thinking that people around me aren't as there as I am - but when I hear people talk about AI art it makes me feel very sad.
>I hate that NPC meme, I hate thinking that people around me aren't as there as I am - but when I hear people talk about AI art it makes me feel very sad.
I agree man, its fucking terrifying
But that's exactly the point. People love AI images because they become addicted to just being able to press a button and see hundreds, thousands of images flashing in front of their face. Each one is disposable and forgettable, but it doesn't matter because there's another 100 right behind them. So they get to create this constant feed of minor visual stimuli created by the algoritmically-analyzed construction based on the basic look of most visually-pleasing art. None of it means anything, none of it has any content or life or passion in it, but that's not the point for the people creating. They just care about that one instantaneous hit of "lol pretty color big boobie" and then it's instantly forgotten and on to the next one.
That's what the baseline, mid-level person wants. They just want to exist on a constant morphine drip of stimulation and no brain activity to get in the way.
We're hitting atomization levels that shouldn't even be possible. One of the few communal bonds left is discussing some prestige show everyone is watching, like when Game of Thrones was at its apex. People can come together and theorycraft, share opinions on characters and plot, relate or disagree with perspectives. All of that gone with this idea of content being generated specifically for you and no one else. What a fucking nightmare world, consumerism and monetization is a yawning maw that swallows everything beautiful.
it's like learning the whole world is addicted to fortnite and tiktok, I never ever touched any of this goyslop shit, more goyslop won't affect me.
>eventually, yes. AI will make movies, games, music, and art all tailored to everyone's individual tastes. No one will watch the same thing as anyone else.
two more weeks
holy fuck artists are literally done for
>only one "artist" had the courage to show his art in the thread
Makes you think
Mine sucks, and I haven't drawn anything in a long time so it's probably gotten worse.
Have you considered that maybe not only artists hate AI 'art'?
it never matters what you post on Ganker or /ic/ to prove a point because the majority of Ganker is retarded and childish and will call it shit out of spite. the onyl place you post art on Ganker is in drawthreads or when specifically asked in a neutral manner.
in any situation when someone here asks you for examples of x on Ganker the go-to response is "those are all shit". even on /ic/ cunts will tear apart the "anatomy" of objectively good art which is why its useless
... Or you're just afraid to be criticized?
I'm not, I know my art sucks.
Genuine question
After ai takes over art/music/movies/writing and all kinds of entertainment media, whats left for humans, just consume and work to death?
What's stopping you from continuing to make your art exactly?
The need for food and basic commodities, realistically no artist will be hired when there is a cheaper option
Though luck. Join the datilographers I guess.
Oh no. Get a fucking job then, if making money is the only reason you do art then you are no different than the machine.
>if making money is the only reason you do art then you are no different than the machine.
...what. Bro making money is the only reason anyone does anything. Are you fucking retarded?
Those with no talent, either because they were too lazy to foster innate skills or they were simply cursed to be mediocrity incarnate at birth cannot comprehend this.
A job is a job.
Isn't the point of concept art to describe the look of a character/object in detail? Those bits in the top middle don't represent anything, and the text is nothing but meaningless artifacts from actual concept art. The full images of the character are mostly consistent, at least, but this is very poor execution for concept art. AI isn't ready to make it yet.
Don't expect AItards to looks at a picture deeper than skin deep.
I don't even hate AI, I just don't understand the aggression towards human artists. The camera didn't replace them, and neither will this.
A human who was very mad at people using AI prompted that. The only artist who are afraid of getting replaced are the ones not worth replacing.
>I don't even hate AI, I just don't understand the aggression towards human artists
Neither do I, as an artist myself I don't have a kneejerk reaction towards AI generated images.
I think it's just sour grapes. We're probably talking about people who want to see others as miserable as they are, and art is one of those things they couldn't touch themselves outside of talking shit.
>All these seething drawpigs ITT
Holy shit I'd look for a new job already if I were you.
I'm having more commision requests than ever, lol. Cope.
Why is that? The swarm of AI pajeets playing pretend has only made real artists 10x more valuable.
This but unironically.
I look at artists under another light now.
Don't care, post bonds.
>AI ""wins""
>artists stop drawing new art
>AI has nothing new to train on
>Everything becomes stale and soulless
AI art is a cool concept but its nothing more than a tool to make a human artist's job easier
You think artists won't continue drawing and painting? Of course they will lol
They're just there to feed AI now.
>AI has nothing new to train on
I don't think you people really understand how this works.
Good
> AAAAIIIEE PAJEETMAN SAVE ME!!! ARTISTS ARE GATEKEEPING ART
Imagine getting mogged by little jimmy holding a crayon with his mouth.
Imagine being so useless that a toddler that shits on his own pants can do something that you can't.
What do you expect, they're lazy and have no taste which is why they keep generating the same soulless big titty anime girls with 3 arms and 12 fingers.
Artists are just seething that new AI artists are better than them, they're "gatekeeping" art by saying art isn't art simply because it's better than what they were making.
You're literally retarded for misinterpreting what's being said.
> You can own your children's drawing
> You can copyright a children's drawing
> You can claim the child made it
> You can sell licenses and make money out of it
> Absolutely none of that applies to AI art
Literally more useless than the drawings a 2 year old shits outs, kek.
AI is for waifu and coom making.
AI fags are just kinda pussies who were too scared to try before the computer could do it for them. Even the shittiest artist is better because at least they tried. They're just seething because they always will be and always have been no skill losers who are too cowardly to ever try and fail at anything. Can hardly even be considered a human being, honestly the ai that makes the drawing is probably more human than them
Why don't you attach your art to your post?
Sure here's a 3D sculpture I made, it's not great but unlike you I've actually tried to make something
>I cant wait for AI to democratize things, soon all those worthless and self-important artists and voice actors will be out of a job!
>hourly pajeets seething about AI taking their jobs thread
>pajeets seething about AI taking their jobs thread
god i wish AI took over pajeet jobs instead of this retardation
>6 months since AI released.
>Still no jobs taken.
>Still fucking up the hands.
The AI "tech" has already peaked. This is as good as it's going to get.
Now do one that isn’t bigtit coombait
I just hope AI generated movies happen so Hollywood finally crumbles and dies.
>guy who watches no indie movies excited for the death of mainstream movie industry
The only real obstacle holding AI art back is the interface we use to control. The reason we get inconsistent garbage is because language is a very imprecise tool to convey information. As the interface improves consistency will improve accordingly as we will no longer need to write a thousand words to create a single image.
We can already see the first stages of this with the implementation of ControlNet allowing more precise control of posing than simply describing a pose and leaving the result up to AI interpretation did a few months ago.
The reason they chose text input is to hide the fact it is not an AI.
When you understand it is not it becomes very easy to see it is worth nothing.
>The reason they chose text input is to hide the fact it is not an AI.
>When you understand it is not it becomes very easy to see it is worth nothing.
I understand exactly what it is, but I'm not entirely sure that you do.
No it's not an actual "AI" in the sense of a Hollywood thinking machine artist in a box, it's just code that does precisely what you tell it to do, like every other computer program.
The way it works is by being very good at predicting what comes next. It does not know what an "apple" is but it knows what sort of image that the prompt "apple" is supposed to return, and if you show it an image of incomplete apple it will be able to predict and fill in the missing details because it knows what an "apple" is supposed to look like. The only shortcoming is that the user's vision of an apple does not direct correlate to whatever randomized default image of an apple the program will return when prompted, and the user only has the most rudimentary boxing gloves on a piano unintuitive interface with which to shape the return that the program generates.
This problem will fade away as the interface improves.
>The only real obstacle holding AI art back
is our own arrogance and not willing to accept the orders of magnitude that's need to do this. we don't have self-driving cars yet, never will.
these tech midwits would rather lower the standards of everything
fucking this
"Jane" probably worked on mobile games for pajeets who don't give a fuck about anything but money.
>200 arts per day
yeah thats fucking retarded, how about you just tell the artists what you want then tell them what to fix?
The person roasting him is exactly right. Artists aren't paid to crank out a billion randomly-generated ideas until one of them looks vaguely correct. It's the whole "Monkeys typing Shakespeare" thing. Can you maybe eventually generate something of value? Sure, probably.
But why not just have an actual artist get it right the first time?
>But why not just have an actual artist get it right the first time?
AI can do this too, faster and better than the vast majority of artists.
Yes I do and it's irrelevant regardless. This anon added some context to my post too
The words have more meaning than you realize, and less meaning than you imagine they should.
Jesus christ that's hideous
If you can generate infinite images why do you save ones this bad
तुम एक बेवकूफ कमीने कुतिया हो।
I love how the foreground character is kinda stable, but everyone in the background is just melting together into a blob of unreadable nonsense. Also the whole composition of this makes no sense at all. There's no balance to it and it has no varying levels of contrast so you can't even figure out what you're meant to pay attention to.
Thanks.
>AI can do this too
lol no
I'll go easy on you. Generate me a generic anime girl but wearing lederhosen and one of those stereotypical bavarian hats
ask next thread, this one is dead
scared?
lol
lmao even
if only you worked this hard on your art
Projecting again, are we?
Everything you didn't circle is good.
Healthy people focus on this aspect of art.
Wake me up when Automatic1111 uses tensorRT and I can gen at 3x the speed
Someone who takes cringe ass FFXIV screenshots is unironically more of an artist than any AI 'prompter'
Anyone who comprehends negative space, focal points, how the human eye processes pictures, etc. is more of an artist. So much of this is "Profile of Hot Anime Woman With K Cup Tits", in a million different ways.
I am putting Koikatsu screenshots as a higher form above AI art.
they look kinda bad but I can at least respect Koikatsu coomers because they don't have the weird jealousy and weird desire to replace artists I see from proompters.
AI isnt the tool but the human prompting the AI is
This isn't AI.
It's just a advanced number crunching.
There is no thought behind the process, that is why it can't replace artists yet, it can replace static anime porn images.
"AI" label is just marketing gimmck.
I'm enjoy the development, and want it to improve, but don't fall for the hype, or the doom.
>page 8 already 500+ post
heh
We need a great firewall around India
>tfw Emad is going to release SD 3.0 in a couple of months
>tfw it will be able to do hands perfectly and improve coherence again
>tfw drawpiggies here and on twitter will seethe so hard it's going to create a nuclear explosion of mad
Can't wait. This man singlehandedly REDEEMED the indian race to me.
now this is a shill
2.x is garbage
there is no fixing hands any time soon
the real losers here are the people who have to sift through portfolio after portfolio of AI generated slop
Bro it's fucking horrible. I do a lot of graphic design work, so I'm always getting emails from sites that sell/host design resources (fonts, templates, etc.) and they're all FLOODED with people selling image packs of hundreds or thousands of AI-generated shit.
It's all garbage, but they make them for free and try and sell them for a few bucks. I fucking hate it, it's everywhere now.
lmao
good
last for Mona!
I like posting
"is this ai?"
realy fucks up artfga's day