ITT: Gaming humor

Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68

Unattended Children Pitbull Club Shirt $21.68

Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    >haha get it shes ugly!!
    very funny op, im dying from laughter

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      I am silly

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Did you just assume the gender of a stronk disabled sentient potato sack?

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >She

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >she

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      > she
      Next time you presume a gender, I hope you get raped by fratboys in the backrooms of a Planet Fitness.

      Xou call xourself an ally but the only thing xou are the CHUDs xwe are fighting against.

      Next time, tow the line or use said line to hand xourself.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        im not an ally to anyone
        i find both sides of this political bullshit moronic

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          >le both sides
          okay homosexual.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            >muh both sides in 2024
            wew lad

            Still not buying into your grift

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          >muh both sides in 2024
          wew lad

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            it's still prevalent

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      ugly people are evil

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        moron alert

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        we know, persona 4 writers

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        /thread
        Physiognomy is real, for every down to earth norf fc with a heart of gold there's 100 seething shitlib marxists trying to destroy their country because they'll never be chad. Total citygay death.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          >talk about psysiognomy
          >but end for a call to kill city dwellers rather than killing degenerates
          It's far from a 1 for 1 overlap, so I'm sensing some suburban cope here.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            city humans are r-selected and are objectively worth less than a K-selected rural human.

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              It's the very opposite. Life in the city is cramped and expensive, so there's very little room and money, so people have less children. (Certain breeds of welfare and public housing recipients excluded, but they're the minority.)
              Suburban lifestyle is mindless, with lots of room, lots of money, more kids, and those kids wrapped in bubblewrap by helicopter moms so natural selection doesn't take it's course.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous
      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        So you're saying 99% of Ganker is evil?

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          why are you asking as if that would be a surprise

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          our nickname was "The Internet Hate Machine" for years, and that was before /misc/
          we were never the good guys, anon

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            >implying hate is a bad thing
            It's called righteous fury for a reason.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        No, uglyness is evil but people are a mixture of good and evil, and an ugly person can still have good traits and vice versa.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          >people are a mixture of good and evil
          You are a Game of Thrones onions. GRRM's edginess has damaged literature

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            You're fricking moronic if you think GRRM was the first person to say that all people have both good and evil in them.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            >saying people have both good and evil within them is some Gorge Martin shit now apparently
            kys

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        I'd say its more that beautiful people can't be evil since people will overlook that if they look nice

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        No, people are just more forgiving of the transgressions of beautiful people.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        that explains why Gankerirgins and /misc/cels spend all day seething and fantasizing about genocide

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          You really think you'll die safely in your 90s, don't you, troon? The look on your mannish face would be very funny if it wasn't facing the wall.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            Why do virgins get so butthurt when you call them a virgin?
            And why is everyone who disagrees with you a troony? I'll bet you're the same kind of gay homosexual who seethes about the girls in his video games being too ugly too. Because if you can't roleplay as a sexy loose roastie then the video game is woke lmao
            frickin gooner ass trannies

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              virgin is not the heavy handed insult you troons think it is

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                The virgin is immunized against all dangers: one may call him a Black person, homosexual, troony, israelite, it all runs off him like water off a raincoat. But call him a virgin and you will be astonished at how he recoils, how injured he is, how he suddenly shrinks back: “I’ve been found out.”

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                this insult is meaningless against people who are voluntary celibate you know.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        This. The ugliness outside reflects the ugliness within

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        pretty much
        >satan
        blonde hair blue eyed, most beautiful of all the angels
        >yahweh
        big headed lizard lookin motherfricker

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      The joke is that the artist is stupid and uninspired and used the game as a self insert revenge fantasy against someone on twitter who said beibg fat is unhealthy

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Projection

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >She

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Is this the so called media literacy I keep hearing about?

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >she
      nice try sir

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      It's funny cuz it's just true

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >SHE

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        HAS

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >She

      >she

      > she
      Next time you presume a gender, I hope you get raped by fratboys in the backrooms of a Planet Fitness.

      Xou call xourself an ally but the only thing xou are the CHUDs xwe are fighting against.

      Next time, tow the line or use said line to hand xourself.

      >She

      >SHE

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      t minus 5 minutes before you post a chudjak to make fun of the presumed looks of everyone who disagrees with you

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >ugly
      wtf is wrong with you she's brave and stunning.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Like most good comedy, it's funny because it's relatable, and it's relatable because it reflects the truth

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      You are all ugly, troons. No troon is pretty. They are fugly inside and out. The natural response to your mannish visage is aversion and disgust.

  2. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Let's laugh at gaming journos.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      good one, Black person, got a smaller version?

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        just for you homosexual

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          thanks for the thumbnail

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          too big, smaller pls

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous
        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          too big, smaller pls

          >28KB
          >583KB
          you had one job

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      please don't attach such large files on Ganker, people with 56kbps dialup have issue loading them

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      These are the homies that love to talk about "male fragility", guess in a roundabout way it is.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        The only time I've seen a person I actually knew talking about "male fragility" was this chick I was sorta dating.
        We were just hanging out and talking when she suddenly asks me if she can put some makeup on me. I was momentarily baffled but quickly said no, and she replied with a whiny "whyyyy" to which I just added "because it's gay". Then she breaks into a whole speech about how it's not and wearing make up doesn't mean you're gay, and that's just my masculinity being fragile and there's nothing wrong with men wearing make up and a bunch of other shit
        It was then that I finally figured out that it really is just an attack on masculinity with some pretenses of caring about mental health

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          >Is my masculinity fragile?
          >No! My masculinity is under attack!
          lol, jesus, beyond parody

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            >Silly boy, just wear skirts and makeup, it doesn't make you gay!
            It's funny how israeli you are

  3. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    lol!

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      That one is funny too

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      god i wish that were me

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Ew

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >consolegays are actually gays
      !!

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      GAY

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Thats not what happens at all, that just makes gays hornier

  4. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    >a game where you kill Nazis as a fat black lesbian in a wheel chair
    It would be unintentional comedy gold and I'd play the shit out of it

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      The New Colossus has that pregnant black woman shooting nazis, doesn't it? Close enough.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous
      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        I've seen this clip multiple times and a part of my brain still can't accept it's real. Shit is so comical and moronic I can't fathom anyone sitting down seriously to animate it.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          just remember this is the people that will tell you japanese media is cringe and perverted and what you see there is art

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            israeli comedy fantasies and japanese media re both equally shit

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        So what were people complaining about steller blade again?

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          Leftist hypocrisy, basically: it's empowering when we do it, it's oppressive when they do it.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          That it appealed to men

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Whenever I see a pregnant women (either real or animated) do anything other than lie down and rest I get extremely anxious and uncomfortable. Pregnant women should be protected from everything and everyone.
        >she just falls on her stomach
        Jesus fricking christ.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          >falls on her stomach
          >probably ran for a while wearing army boots
          >felt the explosion (ever if she was somewhat shielded)
          >shoot two machine guns at once (she's probably deaf and the recoil is jiggling her organs everywhere)
          forget the kid, he has been turned to jello at this point

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          The child will now grow to become a Gankerner

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            Worse, they became reddit users. She had twin females. And their game fricking flopped hard

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        >slow mo slide
        >grenade plinking off a boot
        >only person who aims at the target standing right in front of their aim is the flamethrower robot
        >only sets fire to her back
        >grenade somehow pulps the entire enemy group without sending shrapnel everywhere
        >tearing off the vest somehow removes her shirt as well
        >le epik smile and blüd as half of two magazines somehow blows up the shitty flamethrower dog
        >the absurdity of a pregnant woman doing all this
        >”wow”
        They have negative self awareness

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        This is just me watching that clip for the first time with no context, and my reaction is that it seems intentionally over the top. It doesn't bother me because I'm not thinking about realism at all.
        Why is this clip triggering people

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          The filthy westoid can grasp nothing but hard edged ideas of what they believe is reality. This is why they cannot handle superior nippon games with actual gameplay. When they see something overtly over the top, they cry and scream and shit their pants at being confronted with the idea of fun and absurdity.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            Tranime cope

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              most of that is pretty based thank you for noticing

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              Frick off Ganker Null

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              It has been so long since I've worn a girls panties on my head.....

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              The last on is a common accurate
              Scandinavian waif, she also only heavily resembles her father because his genes were just that powerful

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          Because this is supposed to be empowering. They expected you to clap at the sight of a STRONG PREGNANT WOMAN baring her chest and pregnant stomach & screaming while dual firing. You live in a reality where you're expected to clap when feminists strip naked and scream in front of cultural landmarks as a form of "protest".

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          Men instinctually feel protective towards pregnant women and women THAT pregnant shouldn't be moving like that.

          It's also just a dumb scene that tries to shamelessly come off as empowering. It basically screams "We have the power of birth and don't need no man"

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        What the hell is this from? Wolfenstein? Of course BJ the israelite would say "wow" like Owen Wilson after that display of feminism.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        >~~*Da'at yiChuds*~~ tech was defeated by pregnant mutt

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        >people who call themselves men are literally pissing and shitting their pants as pixels of a topless pregnant women going 90s action star guns a kimbo with two assault rifles
        you are embarrassing me
        lol holy shit you guys need to get laid

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          Okay I did, now what?

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Carmack would be rolling in his grave

  5. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    self-insert homosexuals are mentally ill

  6. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    They gotta start advertising rope sales in these threads.

  7. 1 week ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      I mean she does have nice breasts though

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        sauce?

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      John Madden if he trans

  8. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    >joke in 2018
    >real in 2024

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >Gay Spaceship Games
      Did they name their company after an old Ganker post?

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >gay/ghem
      What the actual frick ahahahahaha

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        must be a boring life they live when their single defining trait is their sexuality

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >gay/ghem

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      "I'm as queer as you expect most indie ttrpg designers..."
      This is ultimately what frustrates me most about these people. They will scream from the rooftops that you must accept them when they say they are are a pan, gay, asexual, male lesbian with "gay/ghem" pronouns, but then they will turn around and, without even a shred of self-awareness, say shit like, "If you work on TTRPGs you must be queer."

      At the end of the day it's not, "You should respect people's self-identities" it's "You should unquestionably accept MY worldview on everything."

  9. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    based

  10. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Holy fricking based. Who's the artist?

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Look at filename.
      It's markydaysaid.

  11. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    [...]
    based

    [...]
    Holy fricking based. Who's the artist?

    Jesus saw that

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      I don't think he's that much of a pervert.

  12. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    powerful

  13. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    the funny

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Heh

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        It's shit, go frick yourself

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous
          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            Subhuman

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous
              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                does he at least draw proper porn

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                No, he has done pin ups of some of his characters from his main comic though but those aren'tGanker related

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      I'm not a furry, but....

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        anon no!

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Heh

      anon no!

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Anon where exactly do you think we are right now?

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          For those curious, this is from a game by Zed_Technician.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            Anon where exactly do you think we are right now?

            I remember that game but it was only starting development when I heard of it
            Is it anything close to finished now?

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              It's long finished, Anon. The dev has made 10 games since.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                Oh shit, thanks for the heads up

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            Is this from the same frickin guy that did that one game where you're hiding from a home invader and has a rabbit woman built like fricking Mammy from Tom & Jerry toned up to 11? Holy shit my sides.

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              Yes.

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              The Man in the Window?
              Yeah, it's the same guy. He made a sequel to that game as well.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          For those curious, this is from a game by Zed_Technician.

          Fun fact all of those characters are fully modeled under their clothes

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            I know.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          ah, yes, i had forgotten for a moment

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Heh

      >words words words words words words words words words

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        >every comic in existence has to be the length of the average newspaper strip regardless of context or content, or else I become angry
        You should read more actual comics

  14. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    >Stonetoss got doxxed and stopped all racist comics
    >Jinjerzilla got doxxed and stopped completely
    >Only other guy with reach is a neocon who is a rabid Zionist
    >Wormwood still fricking blows and isn't funny
    We won

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      got doxxed and stopped all racist comics
      really?

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Yup. He got doxxed and made millions selling nfts and merch. Chuds will throw money at anything, including Israel, to own the libs

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        It is difficult to make comics about immigrants being bad and Latinos being criminals inherently when you are half Latino. It also means you can't make comics about being proud to be white because you aren't. He can't make comics about exercise being better than therapy, or women who he doesn't like being jealous of him because we know he is a doughy guy obsessed with his circumcision. It takes away a lot of his image, he protected his anonymity because it had value.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          You did it. You bullied a millionaire off twitter. Congrats?

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            he won't have sex with you

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              He can attract racist e pussy off twitter

              All of the money in the world won't bring his foreskin back and I know he hates that most of all. I disagree with him politically so his suffering pleases me. Cope

              Sounds like cope

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                Have you actually seen what he looks like?

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                Boogie gets pussy

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                He pays for escorts.
                You're not wrong, but anyone can do that.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            All of the money in the world won't bring his foreskin back and I know he hates that most of all. I disagree with him politically so his suffering pleases me. Cope

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              >All of the money in the world won't bring his foreskin back
              kek fricking stupid amerigoys.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                Between that and the mommy issues from his parents apparently messy divorce it honestly was just a matter of time

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              No foreskin, Hans. No foreskin.

              >israelite taking sadistic joy in the suffering of the children he's butchered
              It's almost as if they're naturally evil or something...

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          >It is difficult to make comics about immigrants being bad and Latinos being criminals inherently when you are half Latino.
          no it isn't, I'm white I don't think white crackheads deserve the breath of life either.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          That's stupid. I don't care either way.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          >can't make comics about being proud to be white if you're not

          why not? I'm black, and I wish I could draw some shit to gas up various cultures. Propaganda art is so unique in how it highlights the best view of a given group using stereotypes and demeans another via the same methods. You could reverse it and it'd be the same level of "Were gods, you're clods". Imagine an IJA poster with white men painted as brutal Orc like slavers of the East and the Japs as honorable Samurai there to beat them back. The kernel of truth is what makes the best propaganda. Vice versa, Jap rape ape murder fiend being repelled from slaughtering innocent women and children of varying ethnicities by a white stalwart soldier with broad muscles and a fearless glare.

          One of my favorites is Wendy the Welder.
          >We can do it!
          Women for all intents and purposes were considered dainty and unfit for the workforce, but the ability was there. It was hard for most, but by God did they frickin do it. It's almost like the art shows a version of you to aspire to be.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Stonetoss was only funny when you were looking for the amogus

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Stonetoss posted this yesterday which some people might consider racist.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Theirs 2 ways going here but this looks like a middle ground gay shit

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          Yeah I kind of agree. The subtle implication is that confederates/southerners have fascist tendencies which is obviously moronic given the south wanted to leave a tyrannical union.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            The Confederate Constitution literally gave states FEWER rights than the US one

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              Expound, please?

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                Their constitution was pretty much the same as the Union's except it forbade states from abolishing slavery.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                I think a big problem was the Union was reneging on its constitution
                Secession wasn't illegal by its terms and neither was slavery, so a central government forbidding both is tyranny

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                I think you might want to look up your timeline. Either way, swapping one "tyranny" for an equivalent one seems like a lateral move and not a motivating factor in itself.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                Me writing secession then slavery wasn't meant as any statement about the chronology of events
                >Either way, swapping one "tyranny" for an equivalent
                But that's the thing it wasn't. The issue is that the South and the North had too many fundamental differences to keep coexisting under the same central authority
                They were fine with the terms of the Confederate Constitution bc it was made by them for them

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                >Me writing secession then slavery wasn't meant as any statement about the chronology of events
                Your implied chronology is that the Confederacy responded to the Emancipation Proclamation by seceding, because freeing slaves on a federal level is tyranny. In fact it was the Confederacy that seceded in order to ban abolitionism on a federal level.
                >They were fine with the terms of the Confederate Constitution bc it was made by them for them
                So the whole point about "tyranny" is a red herring. The issue was that they wanted to keep slaves, and that's it.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                >Your implied chronology is that the Confederacy responded to the Emancipation Proclamation by seceding,
                Except it really wasn't an since I'm well aware the Proclamation came during the middle of the war.
                >So the whole point about "tyranny" is a red herring
                Obviously not.
                >The issue was that they wanted to keep slaves
                The issue is that they wanted to be free of the Union and any abolitionism

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                Look, man, if federally overriding the rights of individual states to decide the slavery issue is tyranny, then the Confederacy was tyrannical from the outset, and their tyranny preceded the Union's. Same with secession: even if you consider the Union's response tyrannical, the Confederacy was already founded upon tyranny. There is no other way to read this than that it's not some nebulous "tyranny" that was the issue, it was slavery. So much the issue, in fact, that they took tyrannical measures to ensure they could keep their slaves.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                >then the Confederacy was tyrannical from the outset
                How? It had the consent of all the states in it. Did the Union?

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                >It had the consent of all the states in it.
                To be tyrannical? If one of them later decided it didn't want slavery after all, would that have been allowed? Would it have been allowed to secede?

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                >To be tyrannical?
                To have the provisions it did
                >If one of them later decided it didn't want slavery after all
                Then he shouldn't have joined the Confederacy where it's stated abolitionism is prohibited
                Did the Union Constitutional did the same with slavery? Or secession?

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                >To have the provisions it did
                Tyrannical provisions.
                >Then he shouldn't have joined the Confederacy where it's stated abolitionism is prohibited
                Then the Confederate states should never have joined the Union in the first place, maybe.
                >Did the Union Constitutional did the same with slavery? Or secession?
                No, it was less tyrannical in that regard.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                >Tyrannical provisions.
                Not with the consent it had
                >Then the Confederate states should never have joined the Union in the first place,
                Why? Where in the Constitution was slavery or secession forbidden ?
                >No
                Case closed then. The Confederacy ruled with the consent of its States while the Union didn't
                Bingo, that's why the war happened

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                >Not with the consent it had
                If you consent to be governed by a tyrant it's no less a tyrant.
                >Where in the Constitution was slavery or secession forbidden ?
                We're talking here about what the Confederacy forbade in its constitution.
                >Case closed then.
                I'm not sure I'm reading you correctly. What are you trying to say? Did the Union do the same (forbid it) with slavery? No, it wasn't tyrannical in that regard. The Confederacy's was, because it mandated slavery.
                Speaking of consent... did they get the consent of the slaves?

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                >If you consent to be governed by a tyrant it's no less a tyrant.
                But if you consent to its rule and agree with its policies how is it a tyrant? And more, by the original greek definition, a tyrant regarded someone that came to power without constitutional right, so it can't be a tyrant by definition
                >We're talking here about what the Confederacy forbade in its constitution.
                Yeah, and comparing it with the Union's.
                >What are you trying to say?
                The Confederacy ruled with the consent of its States while the Union didn't

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                >But if you consent to its rule and agree with its policies how is it a tyrant?
                Because they agreed to have their rights taken away.
                >And more, by the original greek definition, a tyrant regarded someone that came to power without constitutional right, so it can't be a tyrant by definition
                Then neither was the Union, of course.
                >Yeah, and comparing it with the Union's.
                And the Confederacy forbade more.

                I notice you're avoiding the point about the consent of the slaves.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                >Because they agreed to have their rights taken away.
                Then by that definition every government is a tyranny because it imposes rules on others
                The minute a government criminalizes murder it's a tyranny by your definition
                >Then neither was the Union, of course.
                But by acting beyond the scope of their constitutional power they're acting tyrannically
                >And the Confederacy forbade more
                With the consent of it's governed, unlike the Union
                >I notice you're avoiding the point about the consent of the slaves.
                You've never raised it and it's nor relevant. Slaves weren't citizens, in the Confederacy or the Union

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                >The minute a government criminalizes murder it's a tyranny by your definition
                If you consider murder a right, I guess. But you consider owning other people a right and a fundamental freedom so I suppose you might.
                >With the consent of it's governed
                Well, about 3/5 of its governed
                >You've never raised it
                You can scroll up.
                >Slaves weren't citizens
                That fact in itself doesn't strike you as the problem? Maybe we should just declare the Southern states subhuman so that, consequentially, nothing we do to them is ever unconstitutional.
                Actually the Confederates weren't citizens of the Union either lol but I already pointed that out.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                >If you consider murder a right, I guess
                Why can't it be?
                >But you consider owning other people a right and a fundamental freedom so I suppose you might.
                Lol
                >Well, about 3/5 of its governed
                No, all of it. All of its citizens.
                >You can scroll up.
                I'm good, thanks.
                >That fact in itself doesn't strike you as the problem?
                No. Because it doesn't enter the argument
                >Maybe we should just declare the Southern states subhuman so that, consequentially, nothing we do to them is ever unconstitutional.
                Kek, I'm glad you lost the argument so hard and are now this assmad
                It truly has been a pleasure watching you dodge from point to point before finally giving up and going for a "UHM ACKUTHUALLY SLAVERY WAS BAD, MKAY?"

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                >Why can't it be?
                Well if it can, then surely any murderer is just rightfully rebelling against tyranny?
                >All of its citizens.
                It governed more than its citizens. This is pure sophistry.
                >Kek, I'm glad you lost the argument so hard and are now this assmad
                No, this is precisely the loophole you yourself presented. If you declare people not citizens, then you can do whatever you want to them. They have no rights, then. The constitution doesn't apply.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                >Well if it can
                That doesn't answer the question
                >It governed more than its citizens
                Yeah, it governed plants and animals too. They didn't participate in any form of government though.
                >No, this is precisely the loophole you yourself presented
                No, it isn't. This a is desperate hail mary you're trying because you couldn't debate the legality of the secession process and the relevant arguments that caused it
                >If you declare people not citizens, then you can do whatever you want to them
                Which the Union often did with the Indians and their own slaves
                The problem is that, those in what would become the confederacy were citizens

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                >They didn't participate in any form of government though.
                The slaves, did, actually. See the aforementioned 3/5 compromise.
                >This a is desperate hail mary you're trying because you couldn't debate the legality of the secession process
                Ah, now the issue is legality, and not consent of the governed? You keep ceding ground whilst claiming victory.
                Well, certainly, I don't see how the Union broke any laws fighting rebel traitors.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                >3/5 compromise.
                A question of census, not voting
                >Ah, now the issue is legality, and not consent of the governed
                So you really don't understand how rule without consent isn't legal?
                >You keep ceding ground whilst claiming victory.
                No I already won a ling time ago, even before your little sperg out, but feel free to delude yourself
                >I don't see how the Union broke any laws fighting rebel traitors.
                How were they rebels?

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                >A question of census
                No, no, this was about representation. In the census they were counted as full slaves. The 3/5 compromise was about whether they should count for purposes of legislative representation and taxation.
                >So you really don't understand how rule without consent isn't legal?
                It is if you make it legal. Just like you already admitted that people can consent to tyranny.
                So, the issue is now allegedly legality. Again, the Union broke no law.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                Btw the US is itself illegal. One day His Majesty may reassert rightful control over the colonies.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                >Would it have been allowed to secede?
                Of course. After all, they claimed that they had the right to secede under the current US constitution, and they did not put any convention against it in the confederation constitution.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                Same as the Union constitution...

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                Which all of the confederate states claimed had no right to deny secession (and they were actually correct)

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                So who's to say that the Confederacy would've honoured its constitution in this regard, if challenged?

                But it's a moot point, anyway. The Confederacy seceded, and then it was challenged by the Union. So, firstly, the Union's response could not have been the reason for secession, and secondly, they could not have expected to be covered by the Union's constitution after seceding.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                >So who's to say that the Confederacy would've honoured its constitution in this regard, if challenged?
                The fact that all the parties to the confederacy agreed that that secession was legal under the framework of the constitution that they wrote.
                >So, firstly, the Union's response could not have been the reason for secession
                Who said otherwise?
                >and secondly, they could not have expected to be covered by the Union's constitution after seceding.
                Again, who said otherwise? Their argument, which is correct, is that they legally had the right to secede under the existing constitution. The fact that the union unconstitutionally demanded that they didn't just proves their own disregard for law, which is obvious, the US federal government has brazenly disregarded basic constitutional law ever sense.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                >The fact that all the parties to the confederacy agreed that that secession was legal under the framework of the constitution that they wrote.
                >Of course they would abide by the constitution, it's in the constitution!
                >But the problem is the Union didn't!

                >Who said otherwise?
                You're not? Okay, then, so then we agree that wasn't a reason to secede.

                >Their argument, which is correct, is that they legally had the right to secede under the existing constitution.
                So they did. And at that point, they were no longer covered by the American constitution. And no longer had any rights granted by it.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                >But the problem is the Union didn't!
                Yes, I don't know how this is so hard for you to grasp. The fundamental difference between the confederacy and the union is that the union believed in violating constitutional law to consolidate federal power and the confederate states did not.
                >Okay, then, so then we agree that wasn't a reason to secede.
                Nobody said otherwise.
                >And at that point, they were no longer covered by the American constitution. And no longer had any rights granted by it.
                They never claimed otherwise. That's why they wrote their own constitution. Which, admittedly, was almost entirely derived from the US constitution, but their gripe was not with the letter of the text.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                >The fundamental difference between the confederacy and the union is that the union believed in violating constitutional law to consolidate federal power and the confederate states did not.
                What you're not getting is that if contitutional law can be violated, then there is absolutely no guarantee that the Confederacy would have honoured any state's right to secede any more.
                >Nobody said otherwise.
                Then what violation of constitutional law had taken place prior to the Confederacy seceding?
                >They never claimed otherwise.
                Then what violation of constitutional law could possibly have taken place after the Confederacy seceded?

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                >What you're not getting is that if contitutional law can be violated, then there is absolutely no guarantee that the Confederacy would have honoured any state's right to secede any more.
                Are you seriously trying to argue that the states that respect the constitution aren't better just because they could theoretically change their mind in the future?
                >Then what violation of constitutional law had taken place prior to the Confederacy seceding?
                None that I know of. They left because they just no longer wanted to be part of the US.
                >Then what violation of constitutional law could possibly have taken place after the Confederacy seceded?
                The invasion of the south over the (incorrect) claim that the secession was illegal.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                >Are you seriously trying to argue that the states that respect the constitution aren't better just because they could theoretically change their mind in the future?
                I'm saying it wasn't challenged, but again, it's moot, because the constitution wasn't violated.
                >The invasion of the south
                A region not covered by the Union's constitution. The South fired the first shot, btw. Maybe they shouldn't have done that?

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                >The South fired the first shot, btw. Maybe they shouldn't have done that?
                Lincoln went out of his way to goad the south into attacking Sumter. He literally wanted it to happen.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                >because the constitution wasn't violated.
                It was when the union refused to recognize the secession.
                >The South fired the first shot, btw. Maybe they shouldn't have done that?
                The union fired first by refusing to remove their troops from the south.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            The implication is that he just doesn't like israelites, you fricking moron

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              Ummm you do realize he's talking to a guy saying free palienstin

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                Yes, and the chud is appealing to their common interest: opposition to israel. Just for rather different reasons, which is the joke.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                You literally sound moronic

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                You literally do not understand any of the context for the comic you claim to understand.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                Sounds like you support Israel than Anon
                Want some McDonald's to help support them

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        >literally parroting communist propaganda
        How the mighty have fallen

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          >4chins loves israelites now

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        mogus at the bottom part of the top right cloud

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        got doxxed and stopped all racist comics

        Literally from 8 days ago.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        tree on the right

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >uses violence to silence opposition
      >"why there are no right wing game developer?"

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >Stonetoss got doxxed and stopped all racist comics
      Literally nobody but you morons cared about that thoughever. Every single attempt at owning him has just benefited him more, no matter how hard you cope. The fricking amogus thing made him a millionaire.
      >we won
      You couldn't possibly have lost any harder if you tried.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        No foreskin, Hans. No foreskin.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      It is difficult to make comics about immigrants being bad and Latinos being criminals inherently when you are half Latino. It also means you can't make comics about being proud to be white because you aren't. He can't make comics about exercise being better than therapy, or women who he doesn't like being jealous of him because we know he is a doughy guy obsessed with his circumcision. It takes away a lot of his image, he protected his anonymity because it had value.

      Didn't happen. There is a picture alledgedly of him that leftards insist proves he's a Hispanic even though he's pasty white. He has changed nothing about his comics.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        >He has changed nothing about his comics.
        The ones he's been posting as of late are pretty unfunny.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          Seems like pretty basic Facebook/Tumblr humor

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          when did owlturd change his artstyle?

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            It's a parody of owlturd's comics, suggesting that he's not actually overwhelmed, he just chooses the stress of having uncompleted obligations over the effort of actually fulfilling those obligations.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          his characters are so cute

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Stonetoss was not doxed, the comic red panels was doxed. Then they just said that red panels was also stonetoss with zero actual connection between the two

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        If it wasn't him, why did he get Elon to censor the name and rewrite policies to ban unmasking anonymous individuals? Why was his house taken off Google Maps? Why was the mention of him on his company's site deleted? It was him, bro.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          Red panels was doxed. He was getting all the hate of stonetoss. Of course there was a response. Red panels was having his life destroyed

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            He literally had not posted online in seven years.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            Stonetoss was not doxed, the comic red panels was doxed. Then they just said that red panels was also stonetoss with zero actual connection between the two

            >Ignoring the Japan trip tweets
            The rest is specious but that basically confirms it is not just Redpanels.

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              Yeah, it's the proverbial smoking gun, but it's odd to me to think that RedPanels and Stonetoss are the same person, their art and comedic styles (and talent tbh) don't really match

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                He literally rehashed some of his comics from his old identity and the circumcision obsession makes it more obvious imo

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                I don't think it's unreasonable for 2 people who hate israelites to mention ritualized baby wiener mutilation

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      got doxxed and stopped completely
      Shame I dug his stuff

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Me too. He did have a blind spot for Trump though. I'd be curious to know if he still thinks he'll save the west.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Me too. He did have a blind spot for Trump though. I'd be curious to know if he still thinks he'll save the west.

        This is based by today's standard's, though.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          You mean the obvious Dragon ball Z art style

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      How do these morons even get doxxed?
      Just don't put all your personnal info on social media bro

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        w-what's the full image?

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          You know damn well what's the full image, I won't post it

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          Frick my morbid curiosity, I know full well I'll regret it but what's the image?

          don't fricking do it.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            it's just dickvore you scared newbie

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          wiener vore

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          Frick my morbid curiosity, I know full well I'll regret it but what's the image?

          https://files.catbox.moe/ydwuhz.png

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous
          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            I don't know what I expected

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            ANON NO!

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            Mr. Advertiser WATCH OUT!!

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            Oooh wiener vore. My favourite. Shame it's an ugly furry though.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Frick my morbid curiosity, I know full well I'll regret it but what's the image?

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >Wormwood still fricking blows and isn't funny
      He's by far the funniest person on your list.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        the thing is everyone who thinks this and believes will not be swayed once in power inevitably end betraying everything they believed in, without fail
        "power corrupts" is a very real thing

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          even if you did have an infallible moral compass anything you tried to do to change the current system would be (in the US) denied by congress because you have to rely on a room full of people to agree with you

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            a person with a truly infallible moral compass with utmost belief on that what they're doing is the right thing wouldn't let that stuff stop them

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              wtf real life is a dreamworks movie now? maybe while he's at it he'll convince his enemies of the evil of their ways

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                the point is that if words don't work you use force, if you believe you are doing the right thing then it's justified and there'sno reason not to, unless you don't actually earnest hold those beliefs and would rather rot in comformity and status quo than follow your ideals

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          For many yes, but a few can resist and stay true to themselves and become truly great.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        And he still fricking blows and isn't funny.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          If you're a leftard who's asshurt at getting called out

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      he still butthurt that his own delusion shattered or what?

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        How can people see this and not immediately accurately describe him as a grifter? He clearly does not legitimately hold these beliefs and has showed it

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >the people who disagree with you have to hide behind aliases because if they get found out they have a very real change to get physically attacked
      This isn't the win you think it is.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      got doxxed and stopped all racist comics

      Literally from 8 days ago.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      a decent comic from GPrime85?
      wow

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >Wormwood still fricking blows and isn't funny
      He's by far the funniest person on your list.

      Wormwood is the only one that dares to have a punchline

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        maybe in the past
        it's been years since he was funny

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >cheeto and fedora jokes
      holy shit am I on 2008-era reddit?

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      why is doxxing ok when liberals do it?

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        No bad tactics, only bad targets

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      It was absolutely disgusting seeing people say, "Actually on this occasion doxxing is okay. I no longer believe that doxxing is morally reprehensible and puts people in danger because this time it was done to someone who makes cartoons that hurt my feelings."

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      what are we going to do without the only couple good political cartoon artists now?

  15. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Someone post the edit where the bottom right is a israelite (that is how it actually works).

  16. 1 week ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      i don't get it

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        the portal to hell on Mars occasionally spits out israelites which must be holocausted lest we get Earth again.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          i don't get it

          wasnt the original "holocaust museum"?

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Cow tools.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      sus

  17. 1 week ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Wasn’t the guy Swedish or Finnish or something like that?

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      I remember

  18. 1 week ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      why is his butthole bleeding

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        It's a TERF on her period.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      True

  19. 1 week ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      That's a lie
      Ask a woman if they would date a virgin male

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Ask them yourself.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      I actually agr-
      >women with triple digit sexual partner counts
      Frick off.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        You will marry the town bicycle and you will love it!

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >i don't think virginity matters
      why use it as an insult then?

  20. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    >2018
    Get some new material

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Weird I thought gay people would like sex in their game or mabye I'm thinking furries

  21. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    hihi

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >it's genocide
      >keeps starting wars it can't fight
      Funniest thing is the world would be better off without the "Palestinians". They're the ones that the israelites have been shitting up Europe with. Hell no Muslim country wants them either.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        shalom brother

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          and a bismillah to you Black person. You know I'm right. The best group to wipe out after Black folk is Muslims. Both are really incompatible with the West.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            >thinks muslims browse Ganker
            >muslim boogeyman rent free in his head
            the best group to wipe out before either of these can even be appropriately dealt with is israelites. in fact, the only reason you have gotten away from justice for so long is because you keep whitey busy with those same Black folk and muslims you claim to be the greater threat.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            We don’t solve the Muslim problem without expelling israelites first, rabbi

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            maybe i missed something but as i recall:
            -muslims do not have an AMPAC
            -muslims aren't like 3000% overrepresented in my official government
            -or 5000% overrepresented in my unofficial government (corporations)
            -muslims dont privately own my federal reserve that's driving global up inflation.
            -muslims do not and can not pass laws in my country making it illegal to boycott muslim countries
            -muslims aren't buying out my country's real estate in record breaking numbers to protect their wealth from the aforementioned inflation and removing the prospect of home ownership from the middle class.
            -muslims didn't provide false information about WMDs in iraq that led to 20 years of war and thousands of dead americans
            -muslims aren't siphoning BILLIONS of dollars from my country to wage their desert wars
            -muslims aren't about to take the presidency of mexico and wield the drug trade against the US like a cudgel

            muslims fricking suck but they're happy to stay in their shithole countries when you guys aren't forcing them into everyone else's. YOU are the greatest geopolitical threat to every western nation and it's not even close.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Once again israelitels have caused their own demise (is it 110? 111? Going by snopes we're in the thousands)
        But this time is different. Not only has their "plan" for creating a swarthy brownoid slave caste failed, they introduced into every semite friendly nation the most vehemently anti-hebe peoples on the planet.
        THEN they convinced libshit golems to side with anything that looks brown with a persecution complex.
        Finally they made it public knowledge that "Yes goy, we ARE raping, mutilating, and eating your children."
        So par for the course of israeli practices right?
        WRONG!
        We're in the modern age. The globalist age.
        There is not a single place on earth that doesn't have lightspeed access to knowledge of all realtime hebey jeeby crimes against mankind (gentiles).
        What does this mean? Well we aren't getting expulsion number 111 or 112 or 2000, we're getting 1 (planet).
        Israel looks pretty damn small smack dab in the middle of islam (YidSlam?) central. They should, can you believe they're only 0.2% (That's Zero Point Two Percent) of the global population. 16 million.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          Almost as if it wasn't a israeli plan after all, like we've been saying for a decade and a half now.
          The reports coming out of who's been funding and controlling the anti-semitic campus protests, and was supporting BLM before that, should put the whole thing to rest.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            The israelites made and funded BLM, and dropped them like a rock the instant that the blacks started getting uppity towards israelites, leading to BLM almost immediately disintegrating. Nobody is financially supporting the campus protests, which is why they're so anemic.

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              >Nobody is financially supporting the campus protests
              Soros
              Rockefellers
              Ford Foundation
              Pritzkers

              Some of them are supposedly israeli, which should tell you exactly how much they actually care about their fellow israelites.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                No they aren't. That's why the most they can do is set up tents at the campuses where they already live and then get immediately removed. Compare that to BLM, who had trucks delivering them clothing to hide their identities and palettes of bricks to destroy businesses with and fricking legal representation for the ones that got arrested.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                >then get immediately removed
                They're still occupying dozens of campuses and making it impossible for everyone else to study for finals.
                > fricking legal representation for the ones that got arrested.
                They're getting that too, even though most don't really need it cause they're trust-fund kids and their parents could pay.

                >trucks delivering them clothing to hide their identities
                Never heard about this one, could you sauce me up?

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                no one, and I mean absoluteky NO ONE cares about their fellows, all everyone wnats is money and power, this isn't a israelite thing it's a current society thing

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Honestly this entire situation has been great for waking up normalgays to israeli tricks and how they hide behind 'antisemitism'.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        They only hate israelites, though. They still fight white antisemitism.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      hoho

  22. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    you can't just rape your mother because you lost in a video game. wtf

  23. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Funny thing is the racistfacist homotransphobes on the internet could unironically come up with more authentic diverse characters.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Right. White males, and sexy white females. Cuz they have such a great track record for diversity.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        most of the racistfacisthomotransphobes he's referring to aren't even that racist or homophobic. it's mostly wokies blowing things out of proportion but i guess that part went right over your head.
        still, most people who have been labeled as such would write better characters solely bc they understand making a video game character gay or ugly or black for the sake of it is the complete opposite of interesting.

        Marriage is a contract. The ceremony is optional.
        Foetuses aren't people, women are.
        The vast majority of trans people is just busy trying to live their lives and you're interfering with that.

        >majority of trans people is just busy trying to live their lives
        i'm against the trans movement for lots of reasons but i'm also american. if people want to ruin their lives in quiet then i don't see a problem with that. just do it quietly and don't try to normalize your moron behavior.
        plenty of other morons on the internet are ruining their lives just fine without feeling the need to ruin others

  24. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    >MUH JOOZ
    >MUH SANDNIGGIES
    I just want of them to be nuked off the planet, for god's sake.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      a very pleasant mutual annihilation

  25. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Is this lol?

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Pickme women are so fricking pathetic lel, the female version of male feminists

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        >1M views
        i grow tired. i can't relate to people anymore, everyone gives a frick and i simply do not.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          Almost all Twitter traffic is bots and is fake.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            2,2% of the population? where have I heard that before!?

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            Shocking how little reach footage of israel's continuous crimes has

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        >Pickme
        Is this the term for non moronic women?

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          It's women who pretend to be not be moronic and act like they are different from other women. They are still charlatans.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          It's a buzzword used by leftist women referencing conversative women
          basically if you don't conform to progressive expectations set for the average female voter, your political beliefs can be dismissed because only a woman that wants a man to "pick her" would say and believe those things
          it's ironic and gendered, but these are not intelligent people fr

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        >lol pickme girls are pathetic imagine catering to a man that hates you!!! ladies, let's girlboss this joint.
        >LOL modern feminists are pathetic!! WE'RE the real feminists you know!!!! he's not going to frick you, you know!!

        politically active millennial women on social media are so unattractive it's unbelievable

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          Politically active millennial men on Ganker, however...

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Good on her. A bunch of idiots should never stop her for fighting for what she believed in.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        She's not exactly wrong.
        A big problem with any Right Wing movement that is more than sending money to Israel and letting big companies rape your kids is that it's filled to the brim with sexless young men that hate women
        Like yeah, women are in general emotional and terrible at decision making, but you need to offer a better alternative. The idea of a tradwife, isn't a trophy, it's a partner. It's the mother of your children, it's the manager of your household, it's your rock in a storm.
        No political movement can reach anywhere without women, and that was true even they couldn't vote

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          Slightly related but watching Ann Coulter tell Vivek Ramaswamy that she would never vote for him because he's Indian and him just bending over for her was eye opening and probably the most humiliating display in politics this year so far

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            I didn't watch that, but a less overall relevant affair who ties in more with the subject is Lauren Southern recent whining about how becoming a "trad wife" made her life miserable, ignoring the obvious fact that that has less to do with her alleged tradwifeness and more with the fact that she married a Filipino glowBlack person

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              Yeah, that revealed how it isn't about behavior to those people, it's about race. But the Ramaswamy thing I think is way more enigmatic of a problem with American conservatives especially in the future considering they want (and need) the Hispanic vote which they could get if they toned it down

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                >they want (and need) the Hispanic vote which they could get if they toned it down
                It's way to late for conservatives do anything
                They can court the Hispanic vote, the gay vote or whatever, but it will mean further drifting them into being the Democrats of 10 years ago
                The time to act was years ago, and not allow lefties to take over media and teaching institutions unopposed

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                The Supreme Court will remain conservative for the next 40+ years, that's all that matters

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                Despite Dem screeching, it's a mildly conservative SC

                They've been the Democrats of ten years ago ever since they shifted from being a libertarian aligned party to populism in order to court the expanding evangelical movement that grew out of 1960s counter culture. The writing was on the wall after Watergate.

                >they shifted from being a libertarian aligned party
                Wtf are you talking about Libertarianism is a brand new thing to the party, Progressive Republics like Ted Roosevelt are older than it by half a century and more

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                I mean like, Eisenhower or Nelson Rockefeller or something. Rockefeller Republicans were once a thing. New England once had loads of Republicans, before the party shifted in the 1970s towards populism.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                >before the party shifted in the 1970s towards populism.
                Again, what are you talking about
                Jackson was the first populist president. His entire rhetoric was about the common man and his rights and dignity. Suffrage requirements became more democratic in states across the Union because of him. And it didn't stop there, Zachary Taylor was elected because his vague policies and ideology appealed to a broad number of different people

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                They've been the Democrats of ten years ago ever since they shifted from being a libertarian aligned party to populism in order to court the expanding evangelical movement that grew out of 1960s counter culture. The writing was on the wall after Watergate.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          >No political movement can reach anywhere without women,
          No political women can reach anywhere with women.
          >and that was true even they couldn't vote
          No it fricking wasn't.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            Wrong on both accounts
            Even the Third Reich needed the female v vote. And they had a huge presence in the French Revolution
            >No it fricking wasn't.
            Yes it was. Are you gonna create a society of gay men? What sort of world your creating where a man is at war with his wife, his mother, the mother of his children?

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              >Are you gonna create a society of gay men? What sort of world your creating where a man is at war with his wife, his mother, the mother of his children?
              The fricking roman empire? Also the vast majority of women are politically subservient (because they don't actually understand or care about policy) and just follow the man who shouts loudest. The issue is that we've allowed wicked people to be the ones shouting loudest.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                >The fricking roman empire?
                Roman women had a lot more power and freedom than in contemporary societies. They didn't despise or degrade their women.
                >Also the vast majority of women are politically subservient (because they don't actually understand or care about policy) and just follow the man who shouts loudest.
                You're not entirely wrong, but they more often follow the group trend. Convince a united group of women of something and a larger one follows

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                >Roman women had a lot more power and freedom than in contemporary societies
                Sure, but a lot fricking less than now. While the welfare of women was and should be considered important, it was also well understood they had no business in politics or leadership.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                >Sure, but a lot fricking less than now
                Yeah, and so did the average pleb. You're not gonna be able to return to an aristocratic society the same way you won't be able to convince anyone to abandon electricity

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                >You're not gonna be able to return to an aristocratic society
                Okay? Nobody argued that. We argued taking away women's vote, which is a lot more doable.

                >then get immediately removed
                They're still occupying dozens of campuses and making it impossible for everyone else to study for finals.
                > fricking legal representation for the ones that got arrested.
                They're getting that too, even though most don't really need it cause they're trust-fund kids and their parents could pay.

                >trucks delivering them clothing to hide their identities
                Never heard about this one, could you sauce me up?

                >They're still occupying dozens of campuses and making it impossible for everyone else to study for finals.
                Fricking lmao, what is this fox news tier bullshit. "I can't study for finals because people are camping on the lawn outside the lecture hall!". Frick off, maybe 40 years ago when people actually used the library.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                >We argued taking away women's vote, which is a lot more doable.
                It really isn't. Unless a widespread unified religious movement happens to take over politics

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                >fox news tier
                Love how it only took one post for you to go from "it's not happening" to "it is happening, but who cares?"
                Just because you don't study and you've never read anything not written by Gramsci or Fanon doesn't mean that college students who actually want an education don't read.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                No, it's still not happening. You're reading a zog paper saying that random protests by unsupported unemployed college students on their own lawn is some big conspiracy. It's not.

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              >Yes it was. Are you gonna create a society of gay men? What sort of world your creating where a man is at war with his wife, his mother, the mother of his children?
              The manospheres aren't doing this. They've been criticizing bad women's behavior and telling women how to fix it. If it counts as a betrayal then honestly, are you even "traditional"?

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                Saw a quote that most of these "traditional" women want to go back much less further than the men in the same movement. As in they want the traditionalism of America in the 1990s/00s, not the 1950s. That's the disconnect.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah """trad""" women just want to RETVRN to the point in history where they could do whatever they want without consequence, but also men couldn't get a piece of the pie by throwing on a dress and claiming to also be a woman.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                They literally all want to be Phyllis Schlafly clones: successful, loud women who make a lot of money writing books about how other women should shut up and be in the kitchen.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                >The manospheres aren't doing this
                They very much are, are you delusional? Which part of the manosphere advocates to return to tradition and monogamy? Which one of them focus on the sanctity of marriage and the importance of a spiritual life?
                >They've been criticizing bad women's behavior
                Yeah, because women are hedonistic, aimless and ephemeral. They then advocate men become that exactly that.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                >They very much are, are you delusional? Which part of the manosphere advocates to return to tradition and monogamy? Which one of them focus on the sanctity of marriage and the importance of a spiritual life?
                Have you not seen countless video criticzing women who divorce their husband for dumb reason as well as men? Video that tell woman what the problem is? Video that promote loyalty and honesty? Chris Williamson come to mind
                >Yeah, because women are hedonistic, aimless and ephemeral. They then advocate men become that exactly that.
                >They very much are, are you delusional? Which part of the manosphere advocates to return to tradition and monogamy? Which one of them focus on the sanctity of marriage and the importance of a spiritual life?
                Have you not seen countless videos criticizing women who divorce their husbands for dumb reasons as well as men? Video that tells women what the problem is? Video that promotes loyalty and honesty? Chris Williamson comes to mind
                >Yeah, because women are hedonistic, aimless, and ephemeral. They then advocate men become that exactly that.
                They never do that unless you consider Tate as part of the manosphere when nobody in the community considers him to be one.
                At this point, I guess your view on the manosphere comes from what the fringe mainstream tells you.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                >Have you not seen countless video criticzing women who divorce their husband for dumb reason as well as men?
                No, they're dwarfed by the Andrew Tates and Whatever Podcast types
                >Chris Williamson come to mind
                So one guy in a sea of them?
                >They never do that unless you consider Tate as part of the manosphere when nobody in the community considers him to be one
                Oh c'mon, playing the "not real Communism" now? Is Rollo Tomassi not part of the manosphere now too?
                > guess your view on the manosphere comes from what the fringe mainstream tells you
                Please, enlighten me about the true manosphere and what differentiates them from guys like Tomassi, Tate or Kevin Samuels

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                PsycHacks, LFA, The33Secrets, Alexander Grace , Scott Galloway, Jimmy Carr,
                Entrepreneurs in Cars,...
                The manosphere is vast, and if went out of what the fringe media tells you, you might even agree with some of these man.
                The manosphere is the advocating for more men's rights, gives men advice on how to navigate modern life, points out bad women as well, promotes marriage with high-value women.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                >PsycHacks, LFA, The33Secrets, Alexander Grace , Scott Galloway
                All very small in comparison to the names I cited
                >Jimmy Carr
                The English comedian? Can you find me even a single clip of him saying he's part of a manosphere?
                >The manosphere is vast
                Yeah, so is the world. The problem is that the most popular and most visible part of the manosphere is the people I mentioned.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                He doesn't consider himself one, but he does promote thing that the manosphere want.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah so does the Pope, but he's clearly not a part of it

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        >Pickme women
        term only used by mad roasties, jealous of the fact that men prefer obedient and docile women over hyperactive and independent ones

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous
  26. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Person is bad cus they uglee

  27. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    anyone else think it's weird we live in a time where the furry fetish comic is significantly less annoying then the "serious" comics being posted?

  28. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Why aren't we posting more funnies?

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      I like this troony because it's so close to realizing why people hate it and its kind

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        it's also a diaperfur so i wouldn't give it too much credit

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah they are right one the edge of awareness.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          >using greentext outside of Ganker
          >the text is not green
          absolute transsexual behavior

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            Ganker didn't invent meme arrows.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            So true! Unbelievable that email and forums have been stealing the angle bracket from Ganker for over 30 years!

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              Wasn't the first use of ">" used by a Greek philosopher to quote someone?

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Ironically, trannies hated them for the longest time because their comics were so moronic that trannies assumed it was a false flag right wing comic making fun of them.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >blow it out of your ass.
      >I did, I'm trans!

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      okay

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        >that maw

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        It's vore, isn't it?

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        >that belly
        indeed

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Nu, now post the rape

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >Haha, look how obnoxious I am to everyone around me
      The lack of self awareness is not surpsing at all tbh.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        It is genuinely mind boggling how he doesn't get that his comics always make him look like the moronic butthole.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          >I'm happy when I'm not seething about my delusion
          Holy shit the lack of self-awareness is actually hilarious

  29. 1 week ago
    Anonymous
  30. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    ell emm ayy ohh

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      G4 and it's consequences have been a disaster for gaming

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      is this comic implying people only played halo 3 because g4tv told them to?

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      i fricking hate jpeg
      the lossless version both looks better and has a smaller filesize
      frick you, Black person.

  31. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    jews

  32. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    lol?

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous
      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Is it funny because no one would actually want to frick spiders? I don't get it.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          You already know you're wrong.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            She can wield 2 more guns I’m sure

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      On an unrelated topic, bunny girls in bunny suits are the #1 cause of furrhomosexualry.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        I don't know about that, but it is a pretty powerful combination.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          It is Anon. It really is.

  33. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Someone give her vitiligo

  34. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    I genuinely think that having interesting diverse characters with unique features and backstories are awesome. But devs now are fricking hacks who just want or need to check boxes and don't give a shit about what they are even designing. There isn't anything wrong with a bigger or fat character in a game filled with other interesting and thin characters. Or having fricking cripples fight along side able bodied people if they are even remotely interesting and not just token.

  35. 1 week ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      I'm too stupid to understand this one.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        They are having gay incest sex

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          Kinda hot
          I hope the dad comes home and fricks the daughter too

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        The dad is ugly

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >mother is naked in the last picture
      >coca cola says family
      Is this some kind of incest joke I'm too anti-semitic to understand?

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Lesbian incest is ultra cringe

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Lesbianism is cringe
        The only time women should be scissoring themselves is when my dick is in the middle

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        This comic reminds me of that anon who rescued a dog from his friend after he "found a gf"

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          qrd

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          Oh yeah, I know this story too
          Fake as frick, but entertaining nonetheless

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            The struggle is real.

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              would eat her cookie

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              Why so smug?

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                She knows she's the best.

  36. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    lol?

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      did you know kelly isn't even a real person? it's a pseudonym used by various artists who make the comics for the onion, I thought they were unironic for a long time until I looked it up

      i hate poe's law

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        It's one guy. How could you possibly think they were unironic?

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          anon, it's The Onion

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            Yes, I know, hence why I find it strange anyone could believe they were not being ironic. Anyway, "Kelly" is a pseudonym but it's just one guy.

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              anon, it's The Onion

              It's one guy. How could you possibly think they were unironic?

              I didn't actually know it was from the onion, I just saw the comis here in LOL threads
              I legit couldn't tell them apart from the other actually srrious political cartoonisist

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Kelly has only brought one good thing into this world and it's inspiration for more shitposts

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          >Kelly has only brought one good thing into this world
          Kelly's comics never miss

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        >I thought they were unironic
        moron-kun, please...

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          have you looked at today's political comics, shit's ridiculous and overloaded with labels

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            Yes, I have and I still managed to see these are a parody. Jesus Christ, how slow are you?

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              these days you can't be too sure of anything, but I'm legitimately moronic so instead of defaulting to "doubt everything", my brain has been set to "believe everything"

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      *wolf girls

  37. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    As a Half-israeli American, Nazis unironically took on a third the world. If it weren't for the Russians the war would have gone very different. I wish there were more WW2 games that weren't lefty propaganda.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Why is Mexico in this picture?

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Hard to see but I think it's the Italian fascist flag

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      now that i think about it, i never really found out how itaky lost, i know japan got nuked and germany got buttfricked by the soviets along america and allies then stomped over but ican't ever recall hearing how italy lost

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        They had awful leadership and lacked the industrial base and resources to keep up with anyone so they just got their shit pushed in

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Italy mostly lost to itself.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        they pretty much ran out of gas and flipped sides near the end, so they escaped a bunch of the shit that happened to Germany and Japan post-war eg the berlin wall and insane japanese tariffs

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Italy suffered costant defeats the moment the brits reorganized the front to deal with them. We're talking about this level of humiliating defeats:
        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Compass
        So they got their shit pushed basically everywhere while the reason to get involved was shaky at best.
        I know some anons like to make memes about shitalians and what not, but its worthy to remember that Italy just gave up after the war was already lost, so after stallingrad and kursk. Everyone knew what was written on the wall, same goes for Romani and hungary, it was just german autism that kept the war going, so it was just a huge waste of lives for nothing.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      homosexual

  38. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Literally Hephaestus in Hades 2

  39. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Kekpoopy?

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      ideal

  40. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    No worries there, literally no one is attracted to fat tubs of lard like that.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      I am

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        you are impossibly based anon, and i love you for it

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          that's disgusting
          more?

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            >RIIIIIP

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            I am

            the art style itself doesnt really do much to me but everything else is great
            does this guy do non pornographic romance stuff

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              That used to be all he did. Now he mainly does romance+porn

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                i guess cuz porn is what pays the bills after all

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                I'm sure that's part of it but really I think he's just really horny and is one of those artists who has to doodle every insane idea that pops into his head before he forgets it.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                >Platinum The Last Hope
                I call bullshit even in fiction.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        that's disgusting
        more?

  41. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    LOL

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      More like
      >I want the freedom to ridicule anyone who doesn't conform to my beliefs without any consequences whatsoever

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >I want the freedom to rape children
      >I want the freedom to kill babies
      >I want the freedom to rape children
      No.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >I want freedom to indoctrinate kids into my chemical castratation death cult
      Hmmm. I don't think I like that.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      you can't post her stuff unless you also post her onlyfans

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >want
      >want
      >want

      Isn't those are the things THEY ALREADY GOT????

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      FRICK OFF PIZZACAKE WITH YOUR BLAND UNFUNNY SHIT

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        this b***h will draw moralizing bullshit then days later put out a comic about how strangers on the internet were being too moralizing when she just wanted to look at cute animal pics ;_;

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >top left
      marriage is a religious ceremony between a man and a women. You already had unions. start your own religion
      >top right
      as long as it doesnt kill another human, but abortion kills humans
      >bottom left
      if you stayed away from kids and single sex spaces that you weren't apart of, nobody would have given a shit.

      please formulate proper arguments when you post. thanks

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Marriage is a contract. The ceremony is optional.
        Foetuses aren't people, women are.
        The vast majority of trans people is just busy trying to live their lives and you're interfering with that.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          >Marriage is a contract
          Nope, a civil union is a contract
          Marriage is a religious ceremony
          >The vast majority of trans people is just busy trying to live their lives and you're interfering with that.
          Evidence proves otherwise

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      why does troony artstyle always looks so bland and sterile?

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        It's an actual woman
        She even has an onlyfans
        Not because she needs the money, but because she has a voyeur fetish

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          Are there any female comics who DONT have an onlyfans? Why are women so shameless bros? I fricking hate it here

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            >Why are women so shameless bros?
            Society encourages it

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        funny thing there is that the maga-tard and the eagle looking pretty good here. shame they hate the aesthetic so much.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Because they themselves are bland and sterile.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          as opposed to the incels of Ganker who fall for every low iq conspiracy that gets peddled to their npc brain

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            ywnbaw

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              Why would I want to be a woman? Why is "being a woman" something you obsess over so often, troon?

  42. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    LMAO!

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >back in the slave days we didn't have no computers, everything ran on nigabytes

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        >and man did they bite hard

  43. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    >Steam sales

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >hidden gem

  44. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    that's not even funny, what

  45. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Keeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeek

  46. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    This never happened btw, there isn't a single game that has the picture in OP.

  47. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Ahyuck

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Would be funny with
      >you complain about supposedly occupied territory by occupying campus territory and calling it 'liberated zones'?

  48. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Guys, can we get back to video games?

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      It's very easy to tell an artist is insecure when you see their art is plastered with watermarks

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        It's funny when AI slop copies them tho

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      i want to frick it on-model

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      funny, i never see off-model gays seethe like this

  49. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    all of these probelms would be solved if we left leadership roles to philosopher-king type AIs instead of faulty humans

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >letting leadership to something that can't grasp human anatomy, can't recommend you a good video, and couldn't say Black person to save the world

  50. 1 week ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      the way he looks so proud of himself in the 4th panel always cracks me up

  51. 1 week ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >oh no!?

  52. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    not enough loss comics

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Do you have the original comic?

  53. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    One day....

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      i have a physical dependency on this need more to not die

  54. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Real video game hours

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >that simpsons reference
      sensiblechuckle.jpg

  55. 1 week ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Nope, years later and I still don't get it

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        he's leaning back on the chair and there's a window behind, do the fricking math moron

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Someone told me once that the Orange Ghost is some sort of Korean metaphor for the weight of strife and the color of its eyes indicates the reason.
        The green eyes means strife over money, which makes sense considering the man in a business suit jumping falling to his death in the panel before and the subject matter of "buying" things in the final sequence.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          And why would anyone in the last panel commit suicide?

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            The father may be contemplating because he's creating a façade of stability. He steals his kid's meatball but then says he'll buy him a gift like some of of flex.

            Asians have that sort of autistic mind set that what you do matters more than your life itself and that failure is worse than death even though Buddha scoft at the notion of perfectionism in life. So killing yourself and your family because you can't handle the dishonor of letting them down is something that happens.

            What about the orange eyes?

            No idea, it was a long time ago and could VERY easily be bullshit, I was just convinced because yeah the ghost has green eyes pushing out a guy with a suit and the last panel has a family talking about buying things. Seems pretty obvious.

            Maybe Orange is just general angst and brown and heartbreak?

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          What about the orange eyes?

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Why did he do it bros?

  56. 1 week ago
    Anonymous
  57. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    As there is a wow thread up as well, I might wanna ask: who in Blizz current team looks like that female nog?

  58. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    >500 posts
    >only 100 images
    Where's the humor

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Once all troons have acked out and Ganker is clean again, we can have humor threads.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >Where's the humor
      you are in the wrong place for that friend.

  59. 1 week ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >But mooom I already have a job!
      >I'm a highly respected janitor on Ganker - Video Games!
      >M-my salary? W-well I don't see how this is relevant to the topic!

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      amogus

  60. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    whats with people larping on dis websight?

  61. 1 week ago
    Anonymous
  62. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    >janny deleted a bunch of post making the thread go off bump limit
    ok now can you post something funny already?

  63. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    >noses try and pit the world against palestine for fighting back and demanding the rights

    >noses attempt to rile up radical racists and ant-communists saying they're an example of ''leftism'' tactics

    >completely goes out their way to memory-hole all the shady shit they did during the refugee crisis that caused all the ethnic conflict in the western world we see today

    You can hate third-worlders all you want, but never forget they're escaping from the problems these kinds of '''people'' caused in their own countries. The vast majority of them never wanted to immigrate and many can return home, but won't be able to if this shit goes on forever.

  64. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    I don't understand why you would want every character to be exactly like you. I don't want characters I play as to be autistic. Is it just narcissism?

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Yes, straight white male gamers are extremely narcissistic and entitled.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        >straight white male gamers are extremely narcissistic and entitled.
        Then why did they embrace female characters like Lara Croft and wildly different figured like Mario and Sonic?

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          Mario is a straight white man, dude. And women and PoC loved playing as him. But if they made a black Mario? Oooh, now we have a problem.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            >Mario is a straight white man
            And Sonic and Lara Croft?
            >And women and PoC loved playing as him
            Evidently not. Otherwise they'd be satisfied with him as representation
            >But if they made a black Mario?
            Ooof, trying to erase te distinct ethnic identity of Mario
            Not very PC

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              >Otherwise they'd be satisfied with him as representation
              But... he doesn't represent them. They loved him regardless. Not as representation.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                >But... he doesn't represent them.
                Why not
                >They loved him regardless.
                Clearly not since he wasn't enough

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                >Why not
                Are you represented by black trans lesbian video game characters, Anon?
                >Clearly not since he wasn't enough
                Do you have enough straight white male characters, Anon?

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                >Are you represented by black trans lesbian video game characters, Anon?
                That doesn't answer the question
                >Do you have enough straight white male characters, Anon?
                How much is enough?

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            >Mario is a straight white man
            And Sonic and Lara Croft?
            >And women and PoC loved playing as him
            Evidently not. Otherwise they'd be satisfied with him as representation
            >But if they made a black Mario?
            Ooof, trying to erase te distinct ethnic identity of Mario
            Not very PC

            >Italians are white
            lmao

  65. 1 week ago
    Anonymous
  66. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    wish i knew where to find the originals

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *