The game was decent, but it genuinely has the worst final boss of all time. Maybe it's dependent on the ending you choose, but my final boss was LITERALLY Deacons of the Deep from Dark Souls 3. In fact it was somehow less fun than the deacons.
It is. Orius has the shitty add fight, Umbral ending has Pieta but Cthulhu'd with some new moves, and Adyr ending has no final boss, no really, you just get a cutscene and that's it they didn't bother to make one lmao.
These cheap soulslike games have none of the longevity that the games they imitate have. Lords of the Slop just happened to be forgotten even quicker because it's a genuinely bad game outside of its art direction. How are you going to make a game that gets a smaller player base than DS3 in the year 2023?
I read the dev is atleast aware of the autosave stutter some people like me have, makes the game unplayable. I will probably play this if that shit ever gets patched
My own fault for saying "polish" when I mean "overall presentation". On a technical level, LoP is a lot more polished and has better sound design. However, I still prefer the way LotF plays, even with how far some weapons slide. Honestly, I wish that people wouldn't fight about them so much. They aim for different things.
It's not a bad game but I think I liked the first one better.Which sucks because I fucking love Venom.
I agree. I'm glad that I wasn't one of the people super excited for it, but it's not as bad as Ganker says.
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
they do aim for different things. But LoP actually hits its target while LotF slides across the floor past its target and falls into the abyss
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
We'll just have to disagree there. LotF is the first game in a while where I was actually impressed by the map design. The combat takes some getting used to, but it's really fun once you do. I can understand if you can't look past the sliding, but it feels like a minor thing after playing it for a while. The biggest negative is the enemy variety, but the enemies are all still pretty good (except Sparrows).
>twitch-shilled game forgotten in a few days
what else is new?
>5/10 game trying it's absolute damndest to inherit the legacy of Dark Souls 4
>What if we just slop a bunch of dark edgy zanzibart shit together???
rate my paladin gramps
Why do you keep making this thread?
my first time making it
now why did it flop?
and yet there's no tranny shit in it unlike Elden Ring with Miquella and every other Souls game.
Didn't you JUST make this thread?
proof?
Pattern recognition.
Nice old man.
you tried
The game was decent, but it genuinely has the worst final boss of all time. Maybe it's dependent on the ending you choose, but my final boss was LITERALLY Deacons of the Deep from Dark Souls 3. In fact it was somehow less fun than the deacons.
>Maybe it's dependent on the ending you choose
It is. Orius has the shitty add fight, Umbral ending has Pieta but Cthulhu'd with some new moves, and Adyr ending has no final boss, no really, you just get a cutscene and that's it they didn't bother to make one lmao.
God this game is shit.
At least the Sundered King and Judge Cleric are better than Adyr
Both were pretty boring, especially Sundered King (not replaying this shit game just to see if the updated version is better).
I always felt like the Adyr boss fight was more like a lore dump telling you how the good and merciful Orius is actually a giant cunt
> mogs LoTF and LoP yet still forgotten
These cheap soulslike games have none of the longevity that the games they imitate have. Lords of the Slop just happened to be forgotten even quicker because it's a genuinely bad game outside of its art direction. How are you going to make a game that gets a smaller player base than DS3 in the year 2023?
I read the dev is atleast aware of the autosave stutter some people like me have, makes the game unplayable. I will probably play this if that shit ever gets patched
Because it was very mediocre game, lies of p is the true souls-like and DLC is coming
you're just saying this because you wanna kiss P
Nah, I look hotter than him IRL
bullshit
Easy when you have nordic tall twink genes with blue / grayish eyes and ash blond hair
Lords of the Fallen is better tbh, even if Lies of P is more polished
>Lies of P has big meaty CLANG parry
>LotF has a dinky little *ding* parry
LoP solos
>Lords of the Fallen is better tbh
Only zoomers who need co-op to enjoy a game think this
I played the entire game solo, and I still enjoyed it more.
LoP is more polished, yeah. I still like playing LotF more.
>Spider-Man 2
that has nothing to do with polish, it's just superior sound design
My own fault for saying "polish" when I mean "overall presentation". On a technical level, LoP is a lot more polished and has better sound design. However, I still prefer the way LotF plays, even with how far some weapons slide.
Honestly, I wish that people wouldn't fight about them so much. They aim for different things.
I agree. I'm glad that I wasn't one of the people super excited for it, but it's not as bad as Ganker says.
they do aim for different things. But LoP actually hits its target while LotF slides across the floor past its target and falls into the abyss
We'll just have to disagree there. LotF is the first game in a while where I was actually impressed by the map design. The combat takes some getting used to, but it's really fun once you do. I can understand if you can't look past the sliding, but it feels like a minor thing after playing it for a while. The biggest negative is the enemy variety, but the enemies are all still pretty good (except Sparrows).
It's not a bad game but I think I liked the first one better. Which sucks because I fucking love Venom.
It's definitely not.