Hey guys can anyone play an inverse triple battle with me? It's the last platinum stamp I need to unlock the Ulimate Battle Tower. I really wanna beat it so I can put wild Articuno Encounters in my secret base.
Community-driven video game blog & discussion
Hey guys can anyone play an inverse triple battle with me? It's the last platinum stamp I need to unlock the Ulimate Battle Tower. I really wanna beat it so I can put wild Articuno Encounters in my secret base.
Imagine a timeline where Pokémon games are not infested with bugs and performance issues. Maybe even having textures that are not low-resolution shitters. Dare I say actual replayability as well.
meds
None of that would happen because they'd be too busy programming the rest of the Pokemon. You have been told why they couldn't BBND. They're clearly not going to release games any slower.
It's like you all have some sort of disease that makes you retarded.
> believing bullshit
> calling other people retards
Your chalkboard conspiracy theories are worth even less.
> thinking a giant corporation can quickly and easily perform a task they have done before but slightly longer is a unhinged conspiracy theory
They only have to program each Pokémon into a new engine once per console cycle if they keep the same engine.
Developer decisions are often controlled by investors and not independently thought up by developers. Kill an investor instead of shitting up a web forum and you might have actually did something to change how one of the largest media properties in the world operates in it's product creation
> kill an investor
Meh, just pirate the games.
Pokémon with all Pokémon available would be identical games. As in
>No actual National Pokédex in the Gen III-VI sense, would be like Gen VII where the Pokémon technically exist internally and can be used if traded into the game. There is nothing tracking how many Pokémon you catch beyond the regional Pokédex.
>Missing Pokémon likely have little to no presence in the games themselves
Articuno, Zapdos, and Moltres in Gen II have more meaning and presence in those games than Shuckle, Carnivine, and Cryogonal in Gen VII in its entirety. And that is to say that Articuno, Zapdos, and Moltres may as well not have even been in the games because you can't even encounter them. It's just a trade forward from Gen I. They don't improve Gen II by merely existing in the code. But at the very least they have value in the sense that they're used to complete the Pokédex in Gen II (also that they have new sprites).
Sword and Shield would still be just as much of a dumpster fire if it has those Pokémon internally. You are not getting new encounters or interaction with its world. You are not finding new secrets or discovering anything new. It's like comparing Unown in GSC/HGSS, FRLG, and DPPt to RSE. The latter is a nothing experience that's equivalent to any trade, and I would not count them as an asset to RSE much in the same way I would not count the God Stone in Gen V as an asset.
>Sword and Shield would still be just as much of a dumpster fire if it has those Pokémon internally.
True. There's nothing worthwhile to do in Galar, all Pokémon in or not.
Nah, yoy manchildren would just find something else to whine about.
> franchise goes to shit for the past decade
> "you guys are unpleasible"
You would be saying this in the other timeline too.
That would depend on the quality of the games stupid.
Isn’t Japan like an arm of China?
What’s your opinion on Chinese products?
Is Pokémon a Chinese product therefore
*maggie quip*
>Guys, I’m not happy.
I wonder how Pokemon fans cope with playing any video game series considering literally all of them cut features game to game.
>WHAT THE FUCK I CAN’T PLAY TEARS OF THE KINGDOM WHERE’S CRYONIS AND MAGNESIS AND HEARTY DURIANS!????
Just go play another franchise already Jesus Christ they're never implementing the full dex again
Is what I would say but given I doubt you'll ever be happy
wtf, hearty durians are gone? I hadn't even realized that yet.
Just like the natdex being gone would have been barely noticeable to most people playing the newer games, tbh
no I just assumed they were in the jungle somewhere I hadn't been yet. personally my main issue with natdex getting removed is that they lied about the reason why, and then they gave us a game which actually did have better animations and features at the cost of having less Pokemon (PLA). which is what I expected they meant in the first place. so their approach with SwSh made no sense to me, something arbitrary and weird must have happened during development. thankfully I waited and only bought PLA.
Unlike OP's shitty cope I honestly do wonder about the timeline where GF didn't announce the dexcut, just did it quietly on SwSh's release and forced people to live with it. I imagine it probably would have gone similarly to the removal of Set (which actually has a more tangible impact on the game and is a lot more noticeable). Be curious to know how this board would be like, I imagine not too much different
Naw there would still be outrage
There was outrage at the removal of Set too. It didn't last that long nor was it as autistic or overblown
There isn't a set subcription service retard.
Yeah, and Home should never have existed either
If home never existed the dexcut would be significantly less immoral.
it was almost the shadiest it could possibly have been. but they at least let you transfer the ones in the DLC without actually buying the DLC. however, restricting the global trade "feature" to Home was unexpectedly douchey. and taking forever to update Home, every time, is getting old.
How about the timeline where Gen 7 is on Switch and Gen 8 is DLC and Go is deleted.
>Pokémon should go Open World like Zelda
>Kaphotics, zoom in on the complainers
>Check their last competetiv—
>Nice, 4 EM and female as well.
Can’t visit your Articuno base today sis, I’m trying to find LGND Trainer class in ranked for my 50 wins stamp so I can get Zapdos encounters in my base