>Nintendo has an optional online service for $50 a year

>Nintendo has an optional online service for $50 a year
>ARE YOU KIDDING ME LOL WHO WOULD PAY FOR THAT THEYRE KILLING THE INDUSTRY THIS IS WHY NO ONE LIKES THEM
>Sony is trying to push for $70 games to be the norm
>silence
says alot doesnt it?
>in b4 some snoy retard claims whataboutism
they’re not even comparable for your "w-whataboutism" argument, one is optional and is still cheaper than the other online services, the other is trying to influence the entire industry by raising the price of games $10.

54 thoughts on “>Nintendo has an optional online service for $50 a year”

  1. >>Sony is trying to push for $70 games to be the norm
    >>silence
    I don’t beleive you understand what inflation is or does. Our dollar isn’t worth as much as it was four years ago. And it certainly isn’t worth what it was thirty + years ago. I’ve always thought that the US economy peaked in the early 70’s.

    Reply
  2. >silence
    What the fuck do you mean silence? Nobody’s buying PS games because they’re too fucking expensive. I’ve got a PS5 and I exclusively buy all my games used, picked up Returnal for 30 bucks and Ghosts of Tsushima Big Dick G edition for 40.

    Reply
  3. ps5 games will go on sale and get permanent price cuts over time.
    nintendo will make sure you’re paying out the ass forever for their windows 98 servers and old roms.

    Reply
      • >dude instead of $70 they go on sale for $55, thats a steal!
        I can buy two years old games with a -70% cut on the snoystation, meanwhile switch sales are dogshit, turn on your switch and check the "sales" it’s all mobile tier games. I have a switch, don’t lie to me we can both check it.
        >?? projection.
        The entire catalog is constantly spammed with tendies crying about muh snoy, stop acting like if everyone was as blind as (you)

        Reply
        • >The entire catalog is constantly spammed with tendies crying about muh snoy,
          and yet theres only one thread up vs 10+ for nintendo
          snoys really love to act the victim, you homosexuals flooded the catalog when dread came out too.
          >can buy two years old games with a -70% cut on the snoystati
          NOW THIS IS HILARIOUS LMAO

          Reply
  4. >Sony is trying to push for $70 games to be the norm
    >silence
    What silence? They were being laughed out of the fucking door when that shit was announced and they’re were defending it with the same bullshit deflective arguments you’re making right now.

    Reply
  5. Triple A games should cost 30 bucks and you can not give me a single good argument why they don’t, other than greed on the side of the publishers

    Reply
  6. Let’s remember that both of these cases are awful and instead of fighting amongst ourselves like monkeys entertaining the corporate elite, you should do your part and not reward these practices.
    Yeah I know it’s futile and all that crap since the masses outnumber us but what matters is the principle

    Anyone who disagrees with this is a literal golem shill.

    Reply
  7. Both are trash. Why should I pay for either? I’ve already given them money, and they promised me free games for their online services. Now they change their mind and want to keep increasing the price, without my say in the matter?

    And then they’re SHOCKED when I just emulate everything.

    Reply
  8. >it’s literally whataboutism
    You’re defending $50 MONTHLY for renting old as fuck games while being delusional enough to think being against this ripoff is supporting a $10 hike in prices on a different platform. Eat shit.

    Reply
    • >$50 MONTHLY
      Annually, poorhomosexual. I’m going to investing in purchasing 2 memberships now just to spite the fuck out of you. Cope.

      Reply
      • >i-it’s annually!!!
        You’re still paying multiple times to rent games you could download and emulate for free that are worth no more than $5 full price due to age.

        just dont get the service retard its as simple as that
        >on a different platform
        $70 games are on PS5 and Series X right now, and Sony was the first to announce the price hike. Soon it’ll be 3rd party studios too. dumbass.

        >o-optional
        Stop coping. It’s retarded and a total ripoff meant to milk old discontinued products for nostalgia-addicted subhumans that can’t fathom not paying money for something that isn’t even made anymore.
        >b-but muh snoy muh marcosoft
        Don’t care. Not supporting their price hikes either. Doesn’t excuse what the company you’re devoting loyalty to for free is doing.

        Reply
        • but it is optional. dont pay it if you dont want it.
          >dont care
          of course you dont because that would undermine your entire argument. Nintendo keeps to itself. Microsoft and Sony are going to influence the entire industry for $70 titles. retard.

          Reply
          • [log in to view media]

            >i-it’s optional
            You can keep repeating your mantra. It doesn’t change the fact you’re defending a yearly charge for renting old games and the same awful P2P online service every console manufacturer charges for. You’ve been told dozens of times that nobody’s supporting the $10 price hike on other platforms. Nintendo isn’t innocent and you need to get your mouth off its cock.
            Of course, you won’t understand any of this because you won’t accept someone’s opinion unless they’re defending every action of [megacorporation you love].

          • Im not defending it, but its got way less impact on the industry than $70 games. period.
            >nobody is defending it dude!
            lmao you are fucking kidding me right? if no one is defending it, why the fuck is it still happening?
            truth of the matter is people do defend it because they’ll say that inflation exists and developers, despite earning billions a year, need the money. literally had so many snoys tell me this. eat shit homosexual.

          • >if no one is defending it, why the fuck is it still happening?
            idk. why are handheld games $60 now when they used to be $40?

          • >why did nintendo games go from a standard price to a standard price that isnt $70
            I remember you autist, you are one of the dicksuckers I was talking about. ESL homosexual. one is raising the price ceiling of games, the other just made it a standard $60 price.
            you will reply to me repeating it again. its not comparable at all. BTFO’d and I accept your concession.

          • so it’s a "standard price" when nintendo arbitrarily jacks up prices, but it’s "greed" when sony does it. how much is nintendo paying you to shill this shit? or are you pathetic enough to shill for free?

          • >he says when he made this exact same argument months ago and I BTFO him in that thread too
            how much does sony pay you to shill? you literally made this same argument when I last brought it up months ago, and that was late at night. you are pathetic, period.

    • just dont get the service retard its as simple as that
      >on a different platform
      $70 games are on PS5 and Series X right now, and Sony was the first to announce the price hike. Soon it’ll be 3rd party studios too. dumbass.

      Reply
  9. The issue here isn’t that it was considered mandatory or anything.
    It’s that the benefits they are giving you for this optional subscription isn’t remotely worth the price.
    You could pay half that and get 50 Genesis games on a NS cart and not have to pay again.
    The only incentive to ever get that package is if you are still for some fucking reason playing Animal crossing and with friends no less.

    Reply
  10. >BUT… BUT… BUT SNOOOOOOOOOOY!!!
    lmao we don’t even have to start posting about it, homosexual OP is already being obsessed about sony right off the bat.
    Enjoy renting 25yo games you miserable fucking retard.

    Reply
  11. How much is Nintendo charging for Metroid Dread? I can get Hollow Knight for 15.

    The point is fuck all consoles and their paypigs and death to America.

    Reply
    • $60 for a brand new game, thats standard.
      >muh hollow knight
      let me do your line of reasoning
      >wow a new battlefield? how much are they charging? I can get CoD 4 for $15.
      >wow a new warhammer? how much are they charging? I can get aoe 3 for $10
      you are a retard

      Reply
        • its also 4x worse
          >muh playtime
          if we’re going by playtime argument then runescape must be the best game ever made right? homosexual.

          Reply
          • >enormous amount of bosses
            >cool soundtrack
            >large map that you have to navigate using your brain ( backtracking is only a problem for brainlets )
            >big challenge with the coliseum and the boosted versions of bosses
            >all of this shit for $15
            filtered, hollow knight chads can’t stop wining

          • >enormous amount of bosses
            >cool soundtrack
            >large map you have to navigate using your brain (teleportation is only a problem for brainlets)
            >big challenge with raids and the wilderness bosses
            >all of this shit for $0
            filtered, runescape chads cant stop wining

  12. >paying 50 dollars for games you can easily emulate for free
    Vs
    >only +10 dollars for a brand new aaa game
    Not a snoy but you’re a retard OP.

    Granted, games really shouldn’t be this expensive to begin with, but that’s an issue with the modern gaming industry as a whole

    Reply

Add to the conversation