it was an okay game, generic forgettable gameplay with a very cool aesthetic and good graphics
worth one playthrough, not surprising at all that people stopped talking about it after they finished the game
I haven't even learned from osmosis what the end sequence is. Or if it shit the bed in the later half. I haven't seen anything on it.
it was an okay game, generic forgettable gameplay with a very cool aesthetic and good graphics
worth one playthrough, not surprising at all that people stopped talking about it after they finished the game
>he buys videogames based on what the developers country of residence does
I know, right? I personally would have had a smartphone if not for all the slave labor. its really tough being an {ethical consumer}, but it pays off with all the feeling good about myself.
In contrast to what that hack Carmack said, the story is what keeps a game relevant. You can have the shittiest looking, shittiest playing game like new vegas, but as long as the story is good, people will keep coming back to it.
AH was mediocre all around, save for some cool concept art that got translated kind of okayish in the actual game and was weekend at Bernies'd into relevance for a couple weeks through porn marketing.
But just like Overwatch has learned, everyone can have the porn for free without even touching the game.
Atomic Heart's writing was also held back by being marvel tier in quips and post irony. So sad that it's cancer spreading to non-American products too.
>marvel tier in quips
I might be not remembering something, but it really wasn't that bad. I guess the dead chicken can count for this, but that's more of an easter egg.
...How?
If the focus of the shooter is the story, why should I replay it if I already know how it goes?
I could understand if You meant setting oriented, but why should story be a replay factor?
You can't fathom someone watching a film more than once? Or reading a book and then watch/play the adaptation? There are many potential reasons to replay a game and if your game has none of them, it's vapid.
NTA, but you can replay a story oriented game after a few years if the gameplay was good. I'll be honest, I enjoyed Atomic Heart, but I don't see myself doing that.
I liked it more than any Bioshock so that's something. Still suffers from major flaws but those could easily get fixed in a sequel. They certainly did well for their first game.
Im a zigger and I never played this trash. Not when devs get paid off by vk to move the game from steam to some retarded vk games launcher. Somehow hohols and westoids get to play it from the convenience of steam, yet im supposed to shell out an exorbitant amount of money for the privilege of using some slop mobile games platform. Get fucked.
Its simple - i dont care about it enough to bother. Buying it on steam would be easy and convenient enough that I would do it for the sake of trying the game. Otherwise I just cant be arsed.
I enjoyed it, I like single player FPS story games like this and I wished it was longer but they apparently released 1 dlc and is still making more so I'll pick it up in the future when they're done with it.
w-why does the right one have a bulge?
It's just puffy from robotics
I haven't even learned from osmosis what the end sequence is. Or if it shit the bed in the later half. I haven't seen anything on it.
that's just how human body is
In Soviet Russia, sexbot fucks you!
>never seen a vagina
Not surprised
it was an okay game, generic forgettable gameplay with a very cool aesthetic and good graphics
worth one playthrough, not surprising at all that people stopped talking about it after they finished the game
It was just ruskie BioShock
if russia didn't invade Ukraine I might have bought it.
>he buys videogames based on what the developers country of residence does
I know, right? I personally would have had a smartphone if not for all the slave labor. its really tough being an {ethical consumer}, but it pays off with all the feeling good about myself.
I would buy shoes and clothes if it wasn't for al the slave labor....
>I'm just a consumer, I'm not responsible on whatever slop I consume!
NPC-tier.
>taking anything but the quality of the product into account
This is my-game-is-making-a-social-difference tier logic
No, it is worse. It is like risky Infinite but the MC is worse and the pacing is terrible.
What is up with russians and overlying on viral marketing? That Poppy Playtime and Hello Neighbour were the same shit
>Poppy Playtime
is American
In contrast to what that hack Carmack said, the story is what keeps a game relevant. You can have the shittiest looking, shittiest playing game like new vegas, but as long as the story is good, people will keep coming back to it.
AH was mediocre all around, save for some cool concept art that got translated kind of okayish in the actual game and was weekend at Bernies'd into relevance for a couple weeks through porn marketing.
But just like Overwatch has learned, everyone can have the porn for free without even touching the game.
LMAO.
Atomic Heart's writing was also held back by being marvel tier in quips and post irony. So sad that it's cancer spreading to non-American products too.
>marvel tier in quips
I might be not remembering something, but it really wasn't that bad. I guess the dead chicken can count for this, but that's more of an easter egg.
You're right. That is worse than marvel tier.
Nah. It's the music that does that.
It's a story oriented single player FPS, what did you expect?
>story oriented
Is this just a cope for games with zero replay value?
no it is story oriented like he said, but he is coping because the story is dogshit
The story is serviceable. Not great, not terrible.
I wouldn't call it a cope, it's just how it is. Not every game needs to be a rougelite.
>zoomers can't understand playing a game more than once if it's not a roguelike or gaaslop
Sad.
games don't need replay value you fucking GAAS insectoid
GAAS don't even have a defined endpoint, retard. You can't "replay" them.
Story oriented shooters are far superior to the schlock made popular by Call of Duty. Half Life/2, Return to Castle Wolfenstein, Medal of Honor, etc
A good story oriented shooter has replay value.
...How?
If the focus of the shooter is the story, why should I replay it if I already know how it goes?
I could understand if You meant setting oriented, but why should story be a replay factor?
You can't fathom someone watching a film more than once? Or reading a book and then watch/play the adaptation? There are many potential reasons to replay a game and if your game has none of them, it's vapid.
NTA, but you can replay a story oriented game after a few years if the gameplay was good. I'll be honest, I enjoyed Atomic Heart, but I don't see myself doing that.
"Story oriented" does not necessarily mean "railroaded" or even "linear".
No, but a railroaded one and done -experience could still use it as an excuse.
joke's on you, I never remembered that shit
Хoхлы eбaныe тyт cидят
i dont care about his game one bit but is there more to this image?
Goddamn the spam of this game was so annoying.
It really was. But at least the post release discussion was good. Until it does in like 4 days.
I only remember it because of all the "Don't buy this game, you're supporting le heckin ebil putin!" spam.
I liked it more than any Bioshock so that's something. Still suffers from major flaws but those could easily get fixed in a sequel. They certainly did well for their first game.
Im a zigger and I never played this trash. Not when devs get paid off by vk to move the game from steam to some retarded vk games launcher. Somehow hohols and westoids get to play it from the convenience of steam, yet im supposed to shell out an exorbitant amount of money for the privilege of using some slop mobile games platform. Get fucked.
>Im a zigger
Youre a lying homosexual.
>Im a zigger
>muh platform exclusivity
Then why didn't you just pirate like every else lmao
Its simple - i dont care about it enough to bother. Buying it on steam would be easy and convenient enough that I would do it for the sake of trying the game. Otherwise I just cant be arsed.
I can't decide if this is based or you're the dumbest fucking crack smoking retard ever
Shit boring game with some pretty graphics and scenes
Made a buck though didn't it
is that ai or did someone with actual talent make it
I enjoyed it, I like single player FPS story games like this and I wished it was longer but they apparently released 1 dlc and is still making more so I'll pick it up in the future when they're done with it.
have a nice day pdo.
>CRISPY CRITTERS
what did he mean by this?
P-3 is brain damaged. No, really, this is a plot point.
I still rember.
I will play dlc later.
Dont forget! Break the necks of e-boifags.
>T. child rapist
Fuck Russia.