Now that Capcom is done remaking 4
How are they going to fix (or fuck up further) 5 and 6?
Or are they going to pretend they don't exist?
Now that Capcom is done remaking 4. How are they going to fix (or fuck up further) 5 and 6?
This phonograph "reads" a rock’s rough surface and transforms it into beautiful ambient music pic.twitter.com/PYDzYsWWf8
— Surreal Videos (@SurrealVideos) March 3, 2023
>How are they going to fix 6
they can fix it buy retconning it out of the timeline
Remove all campaigns except Leon's then make his longer ftfy
Which would make the original RE6 the superior version, good job, you should work at Capcom, they are looking for more people to fuck their shit up.
That would actually be based but idk if Capcom has the cojones
they'll make them soulless
>company remakes old game with better graphics, controls, narrative, etc.
>old people: "nnnnnnoooooo!!! you ruined my childhoood!!!!!!!!!
Source?
>company remakes old game
>pajeets fuck over everything except graphics
>people with taste: nooooo this sucks you ruined it
Re5 needs proper menu controls (there is a long trend of bad menus in games these days - this is an inexcusable mistake and should bring shame on everyone behind any game like that. Derp souls 1-3 all have horrible menus (no it doesn't matter that you got used to it and then pretend there is no problem with it)).
Also re5's enemy pain states are visually glitched most of the time and are not satisfying like re4's are.
Haven't played re6 yet though.
Code Veronica if they have sense but they should have already done that.
>Antagonist is a cross-dressing "freak"
How would they handle that in CURRENT YEAR?
They should just grow some balls and do it. It'd be worth watching the Hogwarts level Twitter meltdown only for the game to sell well.
Do you think crapcom could be so based? I sure as fuck don't.
Why would they remake a bad game? Why would anyone one to play a remake of a bad game? Because it might be better? So what? Do the good ones first.
>Why would anyone one to play a remake of a bad game? Because it might be better?
Yes, exactly why I'd want that. The good games are already good so it's not like I'm clamoring for them to get redone, especially something like RE4-6, which have been ported to every modern console and PC since their release.
That wouldn't sell. RE3 Remake underperformed. No way they make a Code Veronica Remake which would sell even less.
They just need to advertise Chris part. Hell they can even add Leon or Jill as Chris partner
Re5 definitly getting remade since it closes weskers saga.
I think they will ignore re6 since it was supposed to be about Jakes introduction as a main new character in the series and they havent done anything with it ever since
They should just remake Code Veronica and kill Wesker in that one, then pretend 5 and 6 don't exist.
Why would they remake 5 or 6? Nobody played them.
Big news hombre 5 and 6 sold more than 4, A LOT more, this is why re8, re3make and re4make feel more like re5 and re6 than OG re4 or re7
>re4: 12 million
>re5: 14 million
>re6: 12 million
It's not "a lot" more but fine, they sold well, but they reviewed like shit and I doubt there's much of a market for a remake of either. They're better off doing RE9.
26 million is a lot more than 12 million...
You can't be that fucking stupid.
Who gives a fuck about reviews? If I was a cock sucking review watcher there are a lot of games I wouldn't have ever played. Fuck reviews, I just watch raw gameplay and see if it's something I want to play.
This
Reviews are pretty much either bought or just clueless journalists
>Ganker is defending re5 and 6 now
Re5 was always good
RE6 is only good in coop, anyone who played it agrees the gameplay is perfect but the level design is bad
5 was the first RE game I played, and I honestly think it would still be good.
How do you think they'll punish people for trying to use the box trick by the waterfall? Just have the grenados stay on the bridge and throw their weapons?
Realistically impossible to make re5 in 2023 unless it's set in wakanda and they fight arabs and white only.
6 is actually interesting to remake. That game had a lot of changes. I wouldnt mind if they made less campaigns and made it more Sherry Jake focused with Ustanak as the new Nemesis
I think they should just retcon the original 6 and make a new one starring Leon and Sherry only
5 and 6 are the only RE games that don't need a remake, they're great.
>5
Remake is never happening, too controversial.
>6
Remake is never happen, critical reception is too low.
>Gun Survivor Trilogy
Remakes are never happening, they basically put Survivor 1 into the remakes of 2 and 3.
>Code Veronica
Remake is never happening, if it was they would've done it by now. It's too long, has too many unique environments, requires too many new face scans, and in general the game both has controversial elements and lacks any real acclaim or positivity in the fanbase that would make any effort worth the risk of investment.
>Outbreak
Resistance was intended to replace it.
>Chronicles
Never happening, they're more likely to just bin Umbrella's Fall entirely and try again. Operation Javier will just be referenced, never shown beyond Darkside.
>Zero
Lacks critical acclaim or real commercial success. Not worth the investment.
>Resident Evil 1
This will be the only other remake they do.
>Zero
>Lacks critical acclaim or real commercial success. Not worth the investment.
I could actually see them re-imagining Zero as dlc for 1's remake, where it focuses completely on the train segment.
They wouldn't do that because that'd be fucking stupid.
Additionally, a Rebecca DLC scenario using RE1 assets already exists. It's her Nightmare scenario in Umbrella Chronicles.
>They wouldn't do that because that'd be fucking stupid.
I don't see how it's any more stupid than releasing a remake of 3 that leaves out several areas from the original.
Capcom isn't above thinking "oh people really liked the opening train part from 0 and pretty much nothing else", followed by them awkwardly stapling said section onto a remake of 1.
>I don't see how it's any more stupid than releasing a remake of 3 that leaves out several areas from the original.
The reason for that is because the second half of 3 was never that well paced or designed. It was 4 areas that all lasted around 15 to 20 minutes each that came right after the first half of the game which was just one big level.
The remake just gives the game 4 main environments. Downtown, Sewers, Hospital, Factory.
Remaking one environment from Zero just wouldn't be done because they have nothing to gain, and they wouldn't make it DLC either, because these remakes don't get that kind of DLC.
RE3R was made by team B. And yes even Capcom recognized that game got fucked up
There is a leaker saying Death Island movie is a clue for the next RE game so it might actually be easier to just make a RE9 game with Jill and a new Nemesis enemy type
Jill would be pushing 50 like Chris if RE9 involved her. The model in Dead Island Resident Tide looks like her in 3, at the age of 24
>There is a leaker saying Death Island movie is a clue for the next RE game
>CG films have always been completely standalone side adventures, including the previous ones from the same direction and writer
>THIS one is totally gonna tie-in guys trust me
yeah i bet
Jill should be the RE9 protag just because of how badly they fucked up nuRE3
The first two films actually did foreshadow the games that came out after them (Degeneration ending on a Tricell tease, Damnation ending on Ada talking to Simmons), so this wouldn't be surprising.
Zero or even CV could be used to test coop
>RE5 is controversial
It's literally just pedoteras claiming this. Literally no one except those mentally ill schizos thought the game was racist, the virus happens to be in Africa, just like you kill chinese zombies in China in RE6
The only problematic thing would be claires line in CVR but even they could let that in since Hogwarts Legacy pretty much proved anti trannies will give you more money
The original caused a fuss in 2009 you can bet it will in 2023
>2009
Yeah by white numales or some association shit. Those years were full of NGOs discovering how profitable is to claim everything is racist/sexist
And turns out people still bought re5
>Zero or even CV could be used to test coop
Zero maybe, CV no. It'd require completely restructuring the game and its levels to implement a co op system, and even Zero is a stretch because there's already several moments where one character is captured or unconscious for a stretch of the game.
>It's literally just predoteras claiming this.
It was a massive controversy when it was revealed and led to Capcom adding light skinned enemies and promoting Sheva to being a main character. Remaking 5 is just asking to bring back a controversy they only narrowly dodged that would fuck them over today.
RE6 would be episodic and even worse.
The girls would look like trannies.
RE 5 and 6 > RE 7 and 8
I seriously doubt you could fuck up 6 any further
Remake 5 and make a new timeline where Leon take Ashley's overtime offer.
>REMake 5 comes out
>All the enemies are primarily white now
>Sheva gives you shit for shooting a black enemy even if they're trying to kill you
>Chris punches a boulder in glorious 4K* with a flatter camera shot and less energy in his animation
*Upscaled from 900p via FSR2.0
>Resident Evil -1 announced a few months later to take place before RE0
5 can easily be remade and will probably be the next they do. I’m sure most people want to see it any considering how awful the port to PC was. Don’t get me wrong, I enjoyed the hell of out it, but my god.
6 is a real head scratcher because it literally made them have to reassess the franchise as a whole.
I really want to see Code Veronica because it’s my favorite, but I don’t think it’ll happen.
5 is next. Though it may make hard for them to remake cv and re1 again later
You get wesker voice in re4r which makes me think they are saving his model reveal for a Ada dlc teasing re5r announcement