It literally shows there was no shilling you mentally ill piece of shit. Unlike you BG3 freaks who didn't even play the game because it's an unplayable mess yet still pretend it's a 10/10
Nah they pretty much have to give review copies to outlets like IGN. But all the smaller reviewers + streamers can't afford to get blacklisted, so they were essentially obligated to suck Todd's cock and push $100 early access FOMO
Doesnt this make sense? Why would you send it to someone you know would hate it? Would you want an old dumb bitch grandma to test drive your new car or a professional driver?
>Why would you send it to someone you know would hate it?
because they dont know who will hate it
they only know a few who 100% will love it
probably in exchange for a big lump of cash or other benefits
Why don't people understand that while Microsoft is a company full of radical homosexuals they're not a Hollywood mainstay like Sony? It should immediately become clear what is going on with Sony and the media in that context.
Honestly surprised anyone would have staked their reputation on it, its not bland, its not mediocre, its shit, how could not spend extensive amounts of time with it and not come away with a negative impression? the game feels like it was made by AM to torture people.
the official review score showcase pic they published is all the evidence you need. not one feature that isnt microsoft owned, partnered, or otherwise paid for
If you gave chud nonsense like BG3 a high score I can't see why you wouldn't give one to starfield too. Starfield is actually a much better game with better combat, world building, exploration and writing
Todd's reputation is whatever Todd and his army of loyal cultist say it is. Have you ever met a cult leader who willingly stepped down from a position of great financial power? of course not. Him and Pete "the liar" Hines will just look at the bad fan reviews, shrug, then get back to "working" (supervising) the Starfield DLC and Creation Kit, maybe take a few paid days off if things get too stressful.
Didn't fobes themselves gibe it a good review?
>forbes
> so glowing
they are all 7/10 lmao
WHy are BG3 shills so insecure?
>The shills gave it a 7/10
Isn't that even worse?
It literally shows there was no shilling you mentally ill piece of shit. Unlike you BG3 freaks who didn't even play the game because it's an unplayable mess yet still pretend it's a 10/10
without shilling it gets 5/10
>Forbes
The financial periodical that managed to be wrong every single time in 2022 and 2023.
>BG3 shills
The people who shitpost about BG3 and the people who shitpost about Starfield/Cyberpunk/PoE/Owlcat/etc. are all the same.
>brings up BG3 up out of nowhere
SO A chud IS THE MSOT IMPORTANT DUDE AROUND?
retards eat slop up real good what else is new
Didn't ign give it a 7 is Ganker so full of shit
Nah they pretty much have to give review copies to outlets like IGN. But all the smaller reviewers + streamers can't afford to get blacklisted, so they were essentially obligated to suck Todd's cock and push $100 early access FOMO
Shills literally made anti Armored Core threads to push this dogshit game. Retaliation is necessary, those gays need to learn a fucking lesson.
It was fun and a big ego boost for anyone enjoying AC6 to see shartfield shills trying to take down our sweet AC threads by starting worthless wars.
>Shills literally made anti Armored Core threads to push this dogshit game. Retaliation is necessary, those gays need to learn a fucking lesson.
Doesnt this make sense? Why would you send it to someone you know would hate it? Would you want an old dumb bitch grandma to test drive your new car or a professional driver?
>Why would you send it to someone you know would hate it?
because they dont know who will hate it
they only know a few who 100% will love it
probably in exchange for a big lump of cash or other benefits
APOLIGIZE RIGHT NOW
Damn is 16 that bad?
Did you like 13? If you did then 16 is for you
its definitely something
Getting a sub-90 review score on the modern game review scale means that the game is absolute dogshit
Jim "Stefanie" Sterling won
No shit. Bethesda is done for.
I played Starfield and liked it
>Only 88 with review code cherrypicking
>84 after that
KWAB
Kek IGN isn't getting that TES6 code
>Carefully chose
Sony bullshit. Here's the IGN reviewer, who intercepted the review from a colleague.
MS keeps playing fair. I hope this teaches them to finally stop. Fuck Sony.
>ITS ALL A CONSPIRACY AGAINST XBAWKS GUISSSSSSS NO I DONT HAVE A VICTIM COMPLEX
>MS keeps playing fair.
>every Xbox critic gave it an instant 10/10
ecks dee
>5 publications support Xbox blatantly
>50 support Sony
Guess which entertainment giant's executive offices smell more of gnomish semen?
Why don't people understand that while Microsoft is a company full of radical homosexuals they're not a Hollywood mainstay like Sony? It should immediately become clear what is going on with Sony and the media in that context.
Honestly surprised anyone would have staked their reputation on it, its not bland, its not mediocre, its shit, how could not spend extensive amounts of time with it and not come away with a negative impression? the game feels like it was made by AM to torture people.
the official review score showcase pic they published is all the evidence you need. not one feature that isnt microsoft owned, partnered, or otherwise paid for
More bad news for starflop. That explains why metacritic score keeps falling, currently 84.
it is no secret that the entire film and vidya industry buys their reviews
If you gave chud nonsense like BG3 a high score I can't see why you wouldn't give one to starfield too. Starfield is actually a much better game with better combat, world building, exploration and writing
sure thing, todd
If I were Todd I would've stepped down from my position before all this microshit & blackcock ESG nonsense ruined my reputation.
Todd's reputation is whatever Todd and his army of loyal cultist say it is. Have you ever met a cult leader who willingly stepped down from a position of great financial power? of course not. Him and Pete "the liar" Hines will just look at the bad fan reviews, shrug, then get back to "working" (supervising) the Starfield DLC and Creation Kit, maybe take a few paid days off if things get too stressful.
Digital Foundry claimed that most UK developers/reviewers didn't receive review codes/copies, which they thought was strange.