It's ugly looking with some of the worst skyboxes and the combat is incredibly shallow and doesn't feel good and you have less moves than in Streets of Rage or even Double Dragon 1 on the NES.
I do think it was supposed to be a new Streets of Rage before they lost the rights or the owners changed their minds.
>I do think it was supposed to be a new Streets of Rage before they lost the rights or the owners changed their minds.
It was pitched to Sega and they rejected it.
I do think Fighting Force would've been better than it was if SEGA had helped, especially if Yuzo Koshiro was involved. Plus a SoR for Saturn would've been really cool imo. We would've still gotten Die Hard Arcade anyway
Idk, ps1 version is fine. Regarding move lists, they are slightly bigger than in SoR games but not by much so that anon above is lying. And it plays smoother/less laggy than Die Hard Arcade which is clunky and unresponsive af
No they are not bigger. You have kick kick and punch punch, a throw, and the get off me move. On top of that it’s not responsive and the enemies being able to block just slows things to a halt because you don’t do hardly any damage with anything aside from a gun. The loading times are also unbearable for how short the stages are. If you’ve played any beat em up before this one you won’t like it. It’s just complete crap.
Die Hard Arcade is much better. More variety in weapons and gameplay. Smoother combat, moves and its fairer with timing and tactics. Better music. Its funny at times. DEEP SCAN
Die Hard Arcade is an awful game with weird laggy controls that only saturntards would shill. Fighting Force plays like a Final Fight or Streets of Rage game and is much better.
DHA is borderline kusoge with its movement and input lag. It's like playing VF1 underwater. For a better Sega beat em up rather play Spikeout (which is actually similar to Fighting Force but with better moves). FF is good but it's just too much like SoR with no improvements and worse music, which in turn is just a Final Fight rehash. Basically with Fighring Force you have a 1989 game but with polygons. Capcom's mid 90s arcade beat em ups were more advanced.
How is that a question? Die Hard Arcade is a decent game. Fighting Force is dog shit.
What makes DHA better?
>What makes DHA better?
- Fixed camera
- fast loading time (Also SS)
- Funny Sounds
- 1 sequels and 1 semi-official spin-off
- good extra
It would take a lot to be worse than Fighting Force. What a terrible game.
Idk it looks like Streets of Rage but 3d. What's wrong with it?
It's ugly looking with some of the worst skyboxes and the combat is incredibly shallow and doesn't feel good and you have less moves than in Streets of Rage or even Double Dragon 1 on the NES.
I do think it was supposed to be a new Streets of Rage before they lost the rights or the owners changed their minds.
>I do think it was supposed to be a new Streets of Rage before they lost the rights or the owners changed their minds.
It was pitched to Sega and they rejected it.
Thank god.
It's better to compare DHA to Crisis Beat anyway, not dogshit like Fighting Force.
I do think Fighting Force would've been better than it was if SEGA had helped, especially if Yuzo Koshiro was involved. Plus a SoR for Saturn would've been really cool imo. We would've still gotten Die Hard Arcade anyway
>one of the action greats
>fighting force
hard choice here.
i played fighting force on pc and it was good. was the psx version worse or you guys just have bad taste?
Idk, ps1 version is fine. Regarding move lists, they are slightly bigger than in SoR games but not by much so that anon above is lying. And it plays smoother/less laggy than Die Hard Arcade which is clunky and unresponsive af
No they are not bigger. You have kick kick and punch punch, a throw, and the get off me move. On top of that it’s not responsive and the enemies being able to block just slows things to a halt because you don’t do hardly any damage with anything aside from a gun. The loading times are also unbearable for how short the stages are. If you’ve played any beat em up before this one you won’t like it. It’s just complete crap.
Name some moves that are in SoR but not in Fighting Force
Both of these games are superb. Better than any JRPG. But if i had to say one was more fun, maybe die hard.
>What's worse, good game, or bad game?
gee I don't know
Die Hard Arcade is much better. More variety in weapons and gameplay. Smoother combat, moves and its fairer with timing and tactics. Better music. Its funny at times. DEEP SCAN
Die Hard Arcade is an awful game with weird laggy controls that only saturntards would shill. Fighting Force plays like a Final Fight or Streets of Rage game and is much better.
Post 30 seconds of you playing both games.
Die Hard Arcade is a lot better imo. Fighting Force isn't bad but without SEGA and Yuzo Koshiro's help it really shows.
DHA is borderline kusoge with its movement and input lag. It's like playing VF1 underwater. For a better Sega beat em up rather play Spikeout (which is actually similar to Fighting Force but with better moves). FF is good but it's just too much like SoR with no improvements and worse music, which in turn is just a Final Fight rehash. Basically with Fighring Force you have a 1989 game but with polygons. Capcom's mid 90s arcade beat em ups were more advanced.