PC gaming is saved

>RTX 4060
>$399

nVidia is healing.

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

  1. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    i got a 4070 on release and am happy

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      I would if it wasn't the same price as the 3080.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      I got a 4090 and the room that's in is a furnace lel

  2. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >8gb

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >1080p graphic card
      >8gb
      Yeah all correct

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        graphic card
        >>$399

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        you need 12gb for ps5/xsx ports

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          If you want to play them in 1440p you gay.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            nah, 1080p maxed out 8gb isn't enough

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            who plays with any less than 1440p in 2023? Other than pajeets and poorgay 3rd worlder

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              There's frickall visual difference between 1080p and 1440p. At least upgrade to 4K if full HD isn't good enough for you

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              outed yourself as a modern "AAA" slopdrinker
              1080p has been fine for the actually GOOD PC games made anytime in the last 15 years and no current game even approaches the merit of benefitting from a higher spec
              instead these profligates spend $3,999 on hardware just to run snoyslop remaster remake port of jedi shitshow at buttery-smooth 24fps in glorious 1440p when you could just replay one of the hundreds of worthwhile games from the last 10 years (or good retro emulators that hardly even need any graphics card at all)

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                If you only play the so called good games then 1440p is not too hard to run. When I got 144hz I went through so many older games and they all felt so good.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          Source?

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          >consoles move closer to being outright PCs compared to the last generation
          >pc port optimization trends further downward

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            That's because optimization is the last step during development, and so execs just straight up remove that step nowadays to meet the deadlines. Plus, a lot of codding is now done by cheap third world labor and dumb kids straight out of collage so that kind of people couldn't optimize for shit even if they tried.

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              >consoles move closer to being outright PCs compared to the last generation
              >pc port optimization trends further downward

              Pssst gfx manufacturers and triple digit games have a deal.

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              This. The only thing that can save gaming is economic collapse or Indie Dev stuff exploding due to chat GPT and other AI stuff creating an exponential jump in the work teams of fewer than 10 people can put out.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            they make more money by convincing people they need a console for the optimal experience. People who build their own pcs are an incredibly small minority. If franchises like CoD sell millions every year apply that IQ level to every avenue of media and you will understand really how braindrad moronic consumers are that they actually believe a console is worth the money compared to a midgrade custom pc that can emulate any game in history at better performance and resolution but putting in new hardware that literally clicks in place like legos is still too difficult for them to comprehend.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          This is true to an extent, some indie games and messier console ports will drag you down pretty bad even with 12 GBs. Everyone knows Jedi Survivor is a mess, and in my experience Hell Let Loose will drop to single frames running at 3/4s of max settings. But from friends’ experience and from what I’ve read 8 GBs is good for 80% + of gaming

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            >8 GBs is good for 80% + of gaming
            this is truth for the next couple years.
            i wouldn't ""upgrade"" to another 8gb card but if you've got one you're fine. if you needed a new card and are short on cash, 8gb is fine but don't get the 4060 because it's gimped.
            it's easy to cope when my 1070ti ate elden ring for breakfast. i'll shell out some big bux in a few years and get a high end 50xx or 60xx.
            if my card died right now i'd get a 3060ti

            at some point people will just get a console because nvidya is going moronic with gpu prices

            no, i'd rather have a trash card and continue to game on pc

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >1080p
        That thing is going to bottleneck like a motherfricker at 1080p.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        How strange, we had cards advertised as "1080p" for well over a decade. Are you saying that 1080p in 2023 is still somehow $399?

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          I played Crysis at 1080p on my GTS250 about 15 years ago. Ignore this thread and the morons in it.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            You're not maxing out Crysis at 1080p on a GTS250

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Can't 1080p with a 8gb card anymore.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Why not just buy a 3060

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >1080p graphic card
      >8gb
      Yeah all correct

      >MUH 8GB IS BAD!!!!!!!!!
      Hardware Unboxed is such a fricking homosexual for starting this disinfo

      wow look at that turns out you can run "next gen" games with 8gb vram when you actually put effort into working a release

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        cope

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        modern games frequently eat up to 16gb or more of ram, and even if they didn't the more room you have to breath overhead the better for performance it is, also posting in an advertising thread

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          yeah if they're coded by pajeet monkeys I agree with you
          I ran RE 4 Remake at 4k 60 on my 3070ti btw

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >turns out you can run "next gen" games with 8gb vram when you actually put effort into working a release
        you can't even emulate ps3 games at 1080p with 8gb vram

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          >rpcs3
          >gpu dependent
          thanks for proving you're a moron

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            resolution scaling is vram dependent

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          >you can't even emulate ps3 games at 1080p with 8gb vram
          Source?

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            It was revealed to him by nvidia

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          I play PS3 games at 4K with a 1060, stop the bullshit

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          >emulation uses RAM
          Really? First I've heard of this.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        it's only going to get worse, dummy
        i will stick to my 3060 12gb, 1080p 60fps, thank you very much

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >d4 beta
        >people were reporting memory leaks with gpus with 12 gb on ultra textures and in rare cases gpus were getting bricked
        >start sweating profusely
        >try the beta anyway despite the risk
        >all settings on max except blur and other eye cancer inducing shit
        >a sudden relief came onto me
        >I've been an amd chad with 16gb and on linux and couldn't be affected anyway because I didn't fall for leatherjacket man's lies
        feels good man

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >shill coping sounds
        and if you want $15 more bucks of ram that'll be $100. apple tier pricing lmao.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          >$100 for $15 of ram
          That’s not all your paying for.
          Your paying for the GeForce downgrade program(tm) where they downgrade textures and introduce pop-in.
          Already happened on the updates that “fixed performance” in hogwarts legacy and TLoU.
          So in a round-about way, even by buying the card with an adequate amount of memory, you’re still paying to maintain the status quo of VRAMlet performance.
          KWAB.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            Examples like these are just bugs. Something that modern games now release with. Textures that use 7 gigabytes don't look like that.

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              They aren’t bugs they’re literally updates made months after the game is out.
              You’ll notice the VRAMlet card (on the left) gets “higher fps” but the experience is shit.
              That’s a feature not a bug, meant to fool idiots who only look at fps numbers on a spread sheet to decide what’s good.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Well maybe you are not pretending. Maybe this really is your first year of playing video games. And maybe you really don't know how good textures on even just 1 gb can look like.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Sure if you don't mind buying a new video card every 2 years.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >People will defend anything that Nvidia does

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        For 330 bucks you could have bought an 8gb card in 2015 (R9 390). 4060TI is more than that and we are still stuck with 8gb even 8 years later (which is more like 80 in tech world)

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      IM ON 4!

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Remind me what are some absolute GOAT masterpieces I can't play with 8GB of VRAM. I'll wait.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        anon, the situation will get worse, not better
        sooner rather than later, some random indie games will require 12gb vram
        >but in a perfect world devs would optimize their games!
        cool

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          at some point people will just get a console because nvidya is going moronic with gpu prices

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      To be honest i don't need more of 8gb and for that price is fair enough for me.

  3. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >*RTX 4050

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >128bit
      Won't be usable for AI despite the 16gb ram?

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        But muh L2 cache.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        how much bus and ram is needed for Aigger?

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          As much as you can solder onto a pcb.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >128 bit

      lmao
      the absolutely fricking audacity of those frickers

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      For reference, the x070's, aka
      >fine, don't buy the 4080 OR 4070 you poorgay moron, frick you

  4. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Want to upgrade since my 1080 doesn't have enough VRAM for AI
    >4060 still only has 8gb
    What a fricking scam.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      It’s a —60 class card. You’re dumb for expecting more, and plus there’s a 16GB variant for $100 more.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >It’s a —60 class card. You’re dumb for expecting more,
        kys shill
        >and plus there’s a 16GB variant
        >for $100 more
        exactly

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        3060 had 12GB you fricking Black person
        There is no excuse for this

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          No excuse for what? There's literally always been two versions of xx60 cards with different VRAM
          1060 had 3GB and 6GB
          3060 had 8GB and 12GB
          4060 has 8GB and 16GB
          Like are you moronic or what? This is no different

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            >literally always
            >doesn't mention 2060

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              I was too lazy to look up the 20 series because nobody owned one
              But the 2060 also came in 6GB or 12GB

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            4060 is 8 GB only

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            now compare the price

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        You're dumb to expect anyone to fall for such a lazy line and your employer is dumb for expecting 8GB to sell for anything over $300 in fricking 2023.

  5. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    the 4060 TI sounds weak for a $500 card in 2023 based on its specifications
    the quantity of vram it has is nice but it seems like it would shine in AI as opposed to vidya

  6. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    What moron pajeets coded the launch version holy shit

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      "iron galaxy"

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >driving force behind the rhetoric that you need 128gb of vram to play games are just games that are outright broken upon release

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Due those shitty ports, morons believe it will be necessary up to 16gb minimum to play

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        in fact shitty ports are intentional to make them believe that

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        not just bad ports but also drama queens on youtube that push this narrative becouse it gives them click.. or they just want to shill amd.. With i would have nothing againts with amd was not just as scummy as nvidia. The good guy vs bad guy in the market is always completely silly.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        not just bad ports but also drama queens on youtube that push this narrative becouse it gives them click.. or they just want to shill amd.. With i would have nothing againts with amd was not just as scummy as nvidia. The good guy vs bad guy in the market is always completely silly.

        Killzone 2 would be impossible without at least 8GB of VRAM and 16 RAM these days. Why? The developers. Why would you subsidize incompetent development by demanding the ability to purchase a video graphics adapter with at least 16GB VRAM? AMD shills do not understand this.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          I remember it was giga impossible to play FPS on console, so I just cheesed with that spy classes camouflaging and shanking people from across the room with insta kill lock on. The assmad was unbelievable carrying those games

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          >AMD shills do not understand this
          You are just outing yourself as an Nvidia fanboy. "Hurr Nvidia is right they should give us less VRAM!". have a nice day.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            I have an AMD 5700xt at the moment. I am not subsidizing developer laziness or incompetency with my own money and neither should you.

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              That's why I'm still on 8GB of RAM also. I am not subsidizing developer laziness by buying another stick of RAM. Frick the RAM industry israelites.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                you're really sticking it to the man by having a suboptimal pc experience

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >a suboptimal pc experience
                What sort of dumbfrick shilling is this?

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              Is that actually your setup?

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          Didn't killzone 2 run a 640x480 or some ridiculous resolution like that?

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            It ran at 720p but they advertised that it would release at 1080p. Snoys also expected 60fps and it would kill crysis as the king of graphics with the almighty CELL

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              In rpcs3 it has the option to select 1080p, not scaling, just default. Dunno if it is just the emulator or the original game itself.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Killzone 2 supports 720p and 960x1080.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          See:

          Most modern AAA releases on PC are unoptomized and older cards in the same class released with more VRAM or for far less money. Gimping vram on next gen cards isn't going to change how developers make games.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Killzone 2 would be impossible without at least 8GB of VRAM and 16 RAM these days. Why?
          Because Killzone 2 wouldn't target 720p with low res textures.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          It's funny you're using Killzone as an example. A shitty looking game with tons of particle effects thrown in to hide the garbage textures and low res rendering resolution.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        vram inflation is good because itll be cheaper to proompt based curries

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >What moron pajeets coded the launch version holy shit
      iron galaxy, the company that brought you such hits as arkham knight which took a year to fix.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Iron Galaxy, the company so fricking bad that it's now become notorious for shitty ports. But someone, somewhere, keeps managing to get them business. How, I can't tell you. Even if they were cheap surely the followup costs to fix the frick ups for months would negate that?

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        It's fricked up that they used to do decent stuff

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >How, I can't tell you.
        It's probably a case of their services being cheap and companies not bothering to get a good porting company if they can pay as little as possible

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          Sony own nixxes, it's just corporate moronation.
          They lose more money from a bad port than they could save.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Textures looking like they traveled to 2007, no this is worse.
      OG crysis and STALKER games has better textures than that pos, and they only needed 512MG - 2GB cards.

  7. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Give the low end model extra vram
    Why?

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      so rajesh can afford it for ai slop

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        The AI coomers need 16gb

        >AI
        A used 3090 is around 750$

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      The AI coomers need 16gb

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Only 6 actually
        Fricking exaggerated

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        you want bus bandwith for ur vrams moran 128 is going to frick ur workload

  8. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >1080p card for $400
    woah what a deal

  9. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >10% faster chip than the 3060
    >at 20% higher price
    >with 25% less memory

  10. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    a 4050 for 400usd

  11. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >8gb

  12. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    It takes manual extra work to make 8gb cards work. What happens when next gen nvidia does up the vram amount? You can kiss that extra dev effort goodbye. An 8gb card is a ticking time bomb that will be broken on release in many titles and may not ever get working if the devs don't care enough. Having less vram than the consoles that games are made for is a bad fricking idea no matter how hard shills try to lie to you about it.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      expect this narrative is false and again only show that people do not have opinion on their own and just follow the herd or what they favorite youtuber said instead of doing own research about the problem.. consoles do not have dedicated 16gb vram just for rendering but also for system that takes 4gb of it and some of the vram also need to be shared with ram.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        The textures are made for 11 to 12GB vram. Then they just put them into some automatic tool to resize them for mid and low settings. Like it can be some shitty photoshop action macro you can make in 30 minutes and leave it to run on thousands of files.
        The results are shit you can see in all of those games that are benchmarking high vram usage with high and ultra textures.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          Oh, then it's a good thing the 4060 has 12gbs of vra...

          Also shared with ram... you think modern games only use what 2gb ram?.. jesus frick

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            They literally are clueless morons adding prefab assets into engine dev kits.
            There are no work hours paid to any of them to do any sort of optimization.
            Console OS reserves around 4GB of memory for background processes and whats left of the shared 16GB is what they aim at and use.
            And its like you are one of the moronic shills that knows exactly what I am talking about but is intentionally playing to be a moron.

            Devs do not even try to use system ram more or to optimize the flow of how and which assets are loaded so you can have 64GB of fastest ddr5 and its worthless if your shitty ass game runs like shit ona gpu with just 8GB of vram.
            They do this intentionally. Thats how the top down corporate orders are from the israelite shareholders.
            Black person homosexuals israelite tool.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Oh, then it's a good thing the 4060 has 12gbs of vra...

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Dude, you bought an 8gb card because you're poor or just made a stupid mistake, but stop trying to throw people into the same hole you fell into as a coping mechanism.
        Anyone reading this thread, DO NOT BUY an 8gb card, you will regret it.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          I did actually buy 4070ti.. but the whole narrative is stupid.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            I bought an 8GB RX 480 in 2017, then an 8GB RTX 3070 in 2020.
            They shouldn't be releasing 8GB mid range cards in 2023, it's a fricking disgrace.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      You're a fricking moronic Black person.

  13. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >nVidia is healing
    not until they cut out the ai cancer and and make gpus again

  14. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    What unoptimized AAA cancer are you morons playing where 8GB isn't enough to game at high settings at 1440p?

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      any game released in 2023

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        werks on my machine

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        I played RE4R at all high settings on 1440p with an average of 90FPS with my 8GB card lmao

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Probably TLOU on release

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Hogwarts
      TLOU
      Jedi Survivor
      Forflopen
      Callisto Protocol
      RE4 with RT
      > inb4 just turn it off
      Plague Tale Requiem

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Hogwarts runs fine on my rig. Too bad it's just another cookie cutter ubishit game.
        The rest is all trash as well so I haven't played any of it.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Hogwarts runs fine on my rig
          It was heavily patched to "better" stream textures. They still take a very long time to load and until they do they look worse than a PS1 title. This is why it runs so well now on low VRAM. Before the patches the game was stuttering like mad because it loaded too many high resolution textures at once.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            But I pirated the 1.0 version. Having no trouble.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            So it's an optimization issue, not a "low" vram issue.

            But I pirated the 1.0 version. Having no trouble.

            Denuvo causes a ton of problems too.

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              >So it's an optimization issue, not a "low" vram issue.
              Partially, yes. But there's only so much a game can do to fit all its assets in VRAM. Texture streaming on low VRAM will always look bad.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Texture streaming on low VRAM will always look bad
                So just load in textures beforehand? Everyone has at least an SSD these days so there's no excuse for devs to not be able to implement this.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >So just load in textures beforehand?
                No space. Will lead to stuttering because of VRAM running out. Texture streaming is a necessity.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Hogwarts runs fine on my rig. Too bad it's just another cookie cutter ubishit game.
        The rest is all trash as well so I haven't played any of it.

        God damn but do you homosexuals have horrible taste in vidya.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          ok, you have great taste in vidya.
          Now leave.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            No.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Re4 runs fine in 4k on a 2070s

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      high res vr games with h264 encoding for oculus link

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      128
      Frick off nog

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous
    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      kinda unrelated but if you like generating AI shit with stable diffusion you'll want to max your vram and as someone who thought he'd be on a gtx1080 (8gb) for a decade im now seriously looking at upgrading because it's so fun to generate pictures and the 1080 is at a bad spot where the next gen literally takes half as much time per iteration

  15. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Don't need it to play Deus Ex.

  16. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >an entry level card is now $400 instead of $200
    lmao

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      ?
      Entry level cards are still under $200.
      The 4060 is not an entry level card.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >The 4060 is not an entry level card.
        1080p is entry level
        4060 is console tier three years later

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          The console equivalent card is something like a 2060 super

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            consoles are 6700(xt)
            4060 is a scam

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              They are not.. in fact they are slightly slower than the RTX 2060 super

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >meme tracing

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                cope harder. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I-ORt8313Og&t=

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                It is just meme i swear!

                never change.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Actually it is more close to the 2060 with no super and RX 6600 XT

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Actually it is more close to the 2060 with no super and RX 6600 XT
                and yet it will give x2 performance of a PC with 2060. even 4090 struggles to run latest PS5 ports smoothly while ps5 has no issues. PC gaming is a meme.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                PS5 runs them below 1080p and below 30 fps.

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              >consoles are 6700(xt)
              lolno?
              Their real world performance is closer tot that of a 5500xt. Their games also only run on low-mid settings with upscaling out the ass.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous
      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        please direct me to an entry level card
        last i checked it was supposed to be the rx460 but they didn't actually exist
        and dont even get me started on the gtx1030

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      GTX 1060 6GB would be $377.93 today

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        1060 was $250

  17. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >only aaaa game that might be worth playing on the horizon is starfield
    >no reason to upgrade for it before significant mods are out in a few years
    You are genuinely moronic if you buy a 40 series card.

  18. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >you need more than 8 heckin vee ramerinos
    >what about all the frickin' NEW SONY PORTED GAMES AND UBISHIT TOWER SIMULATORS! DON'T YOU WANT TO BE ABLE TO RUN ASSSCREED 1000 WITH MEGA GRAPHICS AT 16k

    I've bought three games in the last 5 years, why would I give a frick?

  19. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Never a better time to buy a console and wait a few years to buy a used gaming pc that plays patched and actually working games.

  20. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >please bro buy the 16GB bro you really need it bro trust me bro
    >why?
    >to play the latest AAA slop of course
    I haven't played a single (non-indie) game that released in 2022 or 2023

  21. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >nVidia is healing.
    not good enough. a xx50 used to be 200, a xx60 used to be 250-280, a xx70 used to be 320-360, a xx70Ti used to be 400-450, a xx80 used to be 550-650, a xx80Ti used to be 700-750. now those cards are priced relative to their power. so a card that delivers great performance at 1440p today has the same price as a card that delivered great performance at 1440p 2 gens ago. gone is the "oh just wait a year you're going to get something better for cheaper", now it's the same price for the same performance just one card tier lower. in a couple years we're going to see xx50 cards that deliver 4k performance that cost as much as a current gen 4k card.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >a xx60 used to be 250-280
      When? My 3060 cost me 350€ 6 years ago

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >3060
        >6 years ago
        welcome, time traveler

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          Meant 1060

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            msrp of the 1060 was 250

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              Doesnt mean that thats what stores sell it for

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >I overpaid like a moron

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >what are taxes

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                msrp prices are only for the americans. for europe you'll get taxed like hell

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Americans always forget to mention they get taxed as well but it depends on the state how much you pay in taxes. For some reason they don't include tax in the sale price, they only add it on top at the counter/checkout which is pretty scummy but hey they Americans love emulating israeli practices such as mutilating infants and having mandatory tipping at restaurants.

  22. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    worth every penny

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Now post the 8GB, you filthy shill.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous
        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          worth every penny

          >RE got 30% fps increased with across all GPU in 8gb chart
          LMAO WAT?

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            Read small print at the bottom.

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              >Disabling RT at 1080P so it won't crash
              LMAO @ VRAMLET

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      499 US DOLLARS for single digit fps increases at (upscaled) 1080p lmfao

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >1080p
      >comparing normal rendering on old cards to DLSS3.0 fake fps

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >1080p with Super Blur Motion Sickness mode on
      Nice.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >fake frames that magically doesn't work on previous gen tensor core
      >even with fake frame its only 30% more on average
      >without fake frames its 10% on average

      ...and Nvidia think that its worth paying for shills to convince people to buy this shit lmao.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >marvels guardians of the galaxy
      so we just pretending these are games now

  23. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Isn't it worse than 3060? Anons said it has less cuda cores or something. It means it's gonna suck for AI, right?

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      yeah but it is dlss 3.0 compatible so if you're building a 1080p/1440p pc and don't mind enabling dlss you're getting great value.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        I guess no point switching from 6600XT. I'll wait for 5070 or something...

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          poorgay

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            My salary is around 100$/m these days, yeah. I'm literally eating less to save for PC upgrades...

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              Seriously are you for real? You have a better card than me (I'm on a 6600) and I make like $3k/month.
              I think even third worldies make more nowadays.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah, no joke unfortunately. Just got really unlucky in life and currently can't even get a better job. PC is literally the only thing I spend money on, even my clothes are super old, I need buy some this year I guess.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                No, we don't.
                that's nearly a dream wage lol, only some seniors earn that much.

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              Are you a high class gigolo? You must suck some mean wiener and be into some degenerate shit to be earning that kind of cash.
              >animeshitter
              pottery

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                what? he said 100 a month homie
                that's like 1200 a year

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          I got a 2080S and i'm kinda sorta maybe considering rebuilding even though i really don't need to.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        So it's compatible with the feature that introduces artifacting and input lag, and is only even remotely playable at high fps which the 4060 will not be getting. Amazing value indeed.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          dlss looks better than native, and the input lag generated is imperceivable

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            >dlss looks better than native

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            have a nice day corporate shill

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              cope, i bought a nvidia gpu and it simply works better than amd and dlss simply looks best

              >dlss looks better than native

              the guy even says its not noticeable in motion and specifically only has criticism of frame generation (again hard to notice while gaming), looks perfect to me

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >upscaling shit looks better than native
                >input lag imperceivable
                Get cancer israelite tool

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Stop kvetching, goy.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                whats the alternative? amd? get a grip moron, the 7900 xtx costs more than the 4080 and performs worse in most games while lacking less features

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Eat shit uncultured animal

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >the 7900 xtx costs more than the 4080
                In what shithole?

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                on newegg? ur a spastic if you think the 7900 xtx is cheaper than the 4080, while it also lacks dlss and codec shit that the 4080 has

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >on newegg?
                US? My condolences.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >ur a spastic if you think the 7900 xtx is cheaper than the 4080
                meanwhile in reality:
                https://www.newegg.com/p/pl?d=4080
                https://www.newegg.com/p/pl?d=7900xtx
                7900xtx is available under 1k

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous
              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                I am not some tech illiterate mutt that can be fool by that shit propaganda.
                Theres no method or computing or rendering magic that can magically make 1280*720 upscaled to 1920*1080 look better than native plain old 1920*1080.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah but it can do 1440 > 4K better than native 4K because DLSS also has a fundamentally better AA process

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                If you want good AA, then use DLSS at 100% resolution. No upscaling shit.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                You cannot tell the difference at 4K
                Even straight bilinear or lanczos scaling directly from 1440p to a 4K pixel grid it's good enough even on a big TV anyway, DLSS helps just enough.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                I remember playing forza on my 4k TV and not realizing it was 1440p upscaled for hours until I checked the settings menu.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Look gay you can lie to yourself and repeat that shit like a mantra all you want.
                It isnt gonna become true.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Complete denial
                Suit yourself

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                You will never be a real 4K frame.
                You are a 1440p resolution image stretched and mutilated with artifacts to be displayed on a 4K screen.
                Real 4K native frames laugh at you behind your back.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Suit
                Yourself

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                I had a 1080p 24 inch Benq monitor back in 2008.
                My Ati radeon HD3650 256MB was barely able to output image for browsing and mundane tasks onto it.
                I played dragon age origins at 720p upscaled to 1080p. And it looked like shit.
                But then I got a HD4850 512MB and it was handling it all a bit better.
                But man it wasnt until the R9 280X 3GB that it all fit together nicely.
                All games running at native 1080p with high settings and good frame rates.

                One thing that was weird when first 4K TV s started showing up and normalgays asked me for advice on what GPU and system to build for it, was hat there was no real 4K card to suggest.
                Before 4090 I couldnt just say
                >thats top dollar most expensive shit but you get hardware that can do 4K

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                I refuse to converse with people that believe rendering the game at a lower resolution then upscaling it looks better than native resolution. When consoles do this we foam at the mouth but somehow literal peasantry has now become embraced in PC gaming. Actually pathetic. The only reason people delude themselves so completely is because lazy ports can't run on their systems at anything above 50fps if they don't overly rely on lowering the resolution to save the experience. Sad!

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Both DLSS2 and FSR2 offer the best anti aliasing we've seen in years.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Not even close. SSAA and MSAA are objectively clear, you just don't use it because your system can't handle it. Which paints the irony of the picture because SSAA renders assets at a higher resolution then downscales them making for immaculate picture quality and sharpness while DLSS renders assets at a lower resolution then upscales them and applies post processing to blur out the flaws.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          Maybe it's my gsync monitor, maybe it's the nvidia low latency i got enabled, maybe it's my almost 40 year old eyes but i never noticed any of the stuff you're talking about. I get around 100-130fps in MW2 with DLSS at 1440p. Sure, the game looks objectively worse in screenshots with dlss enabled but as long as the picture stays in motion there is no difference.

  24. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >$400 for a low tier card is healing
    Are you fricking moronic?

  25. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    So many people in this thread talking about pointless shit, how about you save some money and buy a decent card instead of like a 4060 or some nonsense. I'm on welfare and I have a 4080, 12900k, 32gb ram, etc. WTF is your excuse for a poorgay pc, who gives a frick about vram

  26. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >low tier 8gb / 128bit for FOUR HUNDRED DOLLARS

  27. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    why is 128 bus width so important? what does it affect and do?

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Doesn't actually matter because they added more L2 cache. It's the same reason why you can use shit ram on 5800X3D, the ram speed doesn't matter because things are mostly in cache.

  28. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >xx60 series card
    >$400
    Gaming is dead.

  29. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Nvidia why do you have to be a memory israelite?

  30. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Nah
    Waiting on a RX 7700X to see how compare at 100$ less than the 16GB version

  31. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >nVidia is healing.
    No it's not, they just got to a point where they weren't selling any cards so they had to lower the prices, still, that GPU should cost 200€ like a 1060 costed, not 500€ like the 4060 costs, this is a literal scam and you're falling right into it.

  32. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >8gb
    Lol
    Lmao

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Name a single game that needs more and isn't goyslop.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Name a single game that doesnt require it that isnt dogshit.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          Check mate.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            So, you admit that you’re checking me out and you wanna mate

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              Everyone wants to mate but it can only happen between a man and a woman or an butthole or a hand. And you're neither, you're a beautiful soul.

  33. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    I want to buy a new card.
    There are 2 choices
    >3060 12gb - new
    >3060 ti 8 gb - used but in good condition
    The price is same for me. 1080p target.

    Which one?

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Depends on whether you want to frick with AI or are worried about the AAA VRAM meme. Do you know the history of the 3060ti or are you just getting one off of ebay?
      Another option would be to wait for the 4060 to drop in a week or so. It's supposed to retail for 299 burger tokens so you could probably get one for the same price as a 3060 if not cheaper.

  34. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >lower bus than my 3070ti
    I'M BUSSIN

  35. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    60 series is not for gaming
    what do you use this for?

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      for AI and shit

  36. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    > $400 for a 8GB card with piss poor performance in 2023
    No, anon. They are not healing in the slighlest.

  37. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    the "I need more than 8gb of vramfor 1080p" meme was spurred by nvidia and amd shills and pajeet programmers who can't code.
    You know what's the ideal amount of VRAM for editing 4k movies? That's right: 8gb.
    And do consider the fact that, in theory, games should not be as demanding as editing movies or games.
    And let's also not mention that games also use the CPU's ram, which is on average 16 GB.
    No matter how high fidelity your game is, if it can't run well at 1080p with 8 GB of vram, it is simply unoptimized GARBAGE
    End of story

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      You talk alot about resolution but that's hardly the biggest culprit. In average, going for 1080 tp 1440 only increases vram usage by like 1GB, if that. It's often the massive 4096x4096 (or even higher) textures that take up most of the space.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        NTA but you're exactly right, remember how uncompressed audio inflated video game file sizes? Same shit is happening with textures and it doesn't make them look better. It's placebo and it only serves to make the new graphics cards with whatever developer has the sweetest deal look good.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      why would anyone still play at 1080p in 2023

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Because he does not fall for marketing gimmicks and is not a consoomie

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Most modern AAA releases on PC are unoptomized and older cards in the same class released with more VRAM or for far less money. Gimping vram on next gen cards isn't going to change how developers make games.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Gimping vram on next gen cards isn't going to change how developers make games.
        This. You can:
        A: Complain about unoptimized garbage and don't play new triple As.
        or
        B: Buy a card with enough VRAM to play unoptimized garbage

        Developers aren't going to improve.

  38. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    xx60 cards don't need more than 8GB regardless of resolution, since the card will throttle long before VRAM does.

    Remember this thing is only like 10% faster than a 3060ti on a like-for-like basis. And nvidia is trying to israelite you into thinking you can use it for AI. kek what a shitshow.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      the 3070 and 3060ti already struggle with 8gb

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        No the 60 cards struggle because they aren't powerful enough to run modern unoptimised AAAslop on max settings. It has nothing to do with VRAM. It's a midrange card and people think you can max out graphics on it.

        The 70 cards does need more than 8GB though, since those should be targeting 1440p resolution or higher.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          >It's a midrange card and people think you can max out graphics on it.
          you could if it had more more vram

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            Nah. Not in most cases at least. The framerate would drop too much before hitting the VRAM limit.

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              the 3060ti is only around 15% slower than the 3070 you fricking moron

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Check videos of a modded 3070 with 16GB or the A4000 (same chip, lower clocks). The card is not that powerful for maxing modern triple As.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                What if the hardware of the cards are exponentially better except VRAM but the software of the video game are worse?

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >but the software of the video game are worse?
                This is absolutely the truth. The only thing we can do is buy a powerful card with as little bottlenecks that money allows. Either that or cry about it later that your card can't play new unoptimized games because of the lack of VRAM or low bandwidth (lol 128bit cards in 2023). In a perfect world everyone would have the money to buy a 4090 and be happy.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                I'll make a powermove and play ye-olde vidya.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            >people think you can max out graphics on it.
            Isn't the x060 always the way to go to max things at 1080p?

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              A card that could max out 1080p was a lot more impressive >6 years ago than it is in 2023.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Alright but if I only cared about 1080p would buying a x060 be good enough? The only catch that concerns me here is the vram difference that might act as a bottleneck considering how modern games are designed. Am I wrong?

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                It *should* be good enough. It's not that you're wrong, it's that these companies are wrong for thinking $400 for an entry level card is acceptable

                >1030
                >1010
                These are for media playback on a setup without an igpu not for gaming

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                We're seeing senseless price increases across the tech industry. Be it smartphones or VR sets. The prices are only getting bigger and bigger. I share your same concerns but if I had a stable job I would probably bite the bullet since I am not the kind of person who upgrades parts often

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Smartphone prices have been relatively stable and VR is a niche emergent market. I spent less than $1k total across multiple upgrades for a flagship phone over the past half decade or so.

  39. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    I will never spend more than $400 (after tax) on a gpu. I just won't.

  40. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    What's the best CPU/GPU combo to play in 1440p/144hz?

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      If you're only going to play, 6950xt. For everything else, at least a 3090.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      pentium 2 with geforce2 mx 400

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Pentium 2
        Black person please.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >i want to spend more on a monitor than my computer, or use a dogshit tn panel
      why

  41. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Imagine being obsolete right off the bat.

  42. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >he can't afford the nvidia card that can magically make 1280*720 upscaled to 1920*1080 look better than native plain ugly old 1920*1080.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >I didnt overpay for a graphics card mr Shlomostain is my ally and nvidia corporation is my family they didnt frick me up the ass and rape my wallet

  43. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Jensen tongues my anus

  44. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >8GB
    completely useless for modern AAA games, buy a PS5

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous
      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Why is digital foundry like that, and why do people act like they're any kind of authority on game performance?

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          Because they are an authority on game performance over any other outlet or channel.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            >digital homosexualry
            >authority on anything but shilling
            Remember the xbox ambient temperature of 18 degrees Celsius reviews?

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              You homosexuals accuse every tech channel of shilling.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Digital homosexualry is notorious for being shills.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                You homosexuals accuse every tech channel of being shills.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                How do you think israelitetube homosexuals earn an income, moron?

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Thank you for proving my point.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Making some gay video to show how well a game runs is not a job and takes no effort you moron.
                They get paid in advertizements and sponsorships. Corps pay them to show their products on their channel for exposure.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Why because you say so? You morons accuse all youtubers of not having a job, no online video takes effort it's all fake blah blah blah.
                >but they have sponzerships!!!
                I don't give a shit. You have no serious argument against their credibility, just the same tired accusations you use against every outlet and channel that covers game performance.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Making some gay video game or making sure it runs well is not a job and takes no effort you moron.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Making some gay video game or making sure it runs well is not a job and takes no effort you moron
                Apparently it does since diversity hires can't program for shit and as it turns out don't have the skills to make a proper, functioning game.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Why would they when making a video game isn't a real job and takes no effort

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Digital homosexualry is notorious for being shills.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Digital Foundry is notorious for triggering console fanboys by exposing their weak performance and getting accused of being shills.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          Because they are an authority on game performance over any other outlet or channel.

          I miss Totalbiscuit's videos.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          The trick is realising that people WANT an authority figure to tell them what to think. They actively seek them out.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        SILKY
        I
        L
        K
        Y

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          silky smooth as a widows web

  45. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Has this happened before in the gpu industry? The 3060 MSRP was 399 and has 12gb vram 192bit bus, I got a used one for $240. Yeah there's a decent performance improvement, at a higher cost, with other worse components and less ram

  46. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >XX60 for $400
    Breh
    Back in my day, the GTX 780 was $400

  47. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >60 class for over $250
    At this point im certain people just like wieners in their ass.

  48. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    No.

  49. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    What PSU would you need for a 4060 ti?

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      A QUALITY 550w minimum. Any decent 650w if you want to cheapout.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >650w
        I have a 650w titanium Seasonic PSU. This should be good right? My current GPU is dying, it would randomly black screen when playing any 3D AAA slop but it's started doing that while I'm just shitposting and not even gaming.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          That's more than enough. The 4060ti is a 165 watt card.

  50. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >4070 is already 700€
    it's never going to end, isn't it?

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Nvidia doesn't care about the consumer market anymore. They earned a shitton during the great cryptocucking and now they earn a shitton on big corpo AI shenanigans. They don't need us.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Nvidia doesn't care about the consumer market anymore.
        And AMD doesn't care either. They make so much more money selling their enterprise GPUs than consumer GPUs, it's not even comparable. The difference is huge.

        We're all fricked. Only Intel can save us but they somehow have worse drivers than AMD.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          >only intel can save us
          you mean the company who gets the Mossad to steal government IP to then use for their own chips? those guys?
          ALRIGHT DUD

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Why do you think they are going on about cloud gaming so much, price gamers out of owning their own hardware and push them onto another subscription service

  51. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    The 4060 is only $299
    The 4060 Ti 8GB is $399
    The 4060 Ti 16GB is $499

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Should be 100 bucks less across the board and the 16GB version costing 100 more than the 8GB version is absolute giga israelitery.

  52. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Nahhhh gonna get a 6700 xt this build, in another ten years when i build another pc maybe the rtx 5xxx will be better

  53. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    It should be half that and retailers are going to make it 500

  54. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    You don't need 1080p goy, dlss is fine to get performance, a base resolution of 640x360 is fiiiiine - why would you need more!?

  55. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    I expect this to perform worse than a 3070

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      I bet it will be on par at lower resolutiosn, but slightly slower at higher resolution. Exactly how the 4070 compares against the 3080.

  56. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    holy frick people are going to make so many ai pics with this thing

  57. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Ok. What's the best AMD alternative then?

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      There isn't one yet. They have no idea how to fix their RDNA3 crap. It's full of bugs and high power draw. This is why they're taking so long to release more cards.

  58. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Low end 8GB card for 400$ (closer to 700€ Europe).

    No, it's fricking over.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >closer to 700€ Europe
      What? The 4070 goes for 650-670€

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        It starts at 900euros lil bro

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          That's the Ti.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          My amazon

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            Dumb anon has been looking at the Ti prices all this time kek

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            That's the Ti.

            My bad, you're right

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              4070 is so cheap compared to 4080

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                The 4070 is such a great gpu Nvidia is putting a temporary halt on production.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                > slower than a 3080
                > great
                Huh...

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                I think you missed the point

  59. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >8gb

  60. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    THANK YOU BASED NVIDA

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      jesus christ, the world really did end in 2012
      is there a similar chart for amd?

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Not him but AyyMD didn't have high end or even xx70 equivalent cards for many generations generations.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          What generations are those then, you moronic shill?

          Tesla/TeraScale - GTX 275/HD 4890
          Fermi/TeraScale 2 - GTX 470/HD 5850
          Fermi/TeraScale 3 - GTX 570/HD 6970
          Kepler/GCN 1 - GTX 670/HD 7970
          Kepler/GCN 1 - GTX 770/R9 280X
          Maxwell/GCN 2 - GTX 970/R9 390
          Pascal/GCN 5 - GTX 1070/RX Vega 56
          Turing/RDNA 1 - RTX 2070/RX 5700 XT
          Ampere/RDNA 2 - RTX 3070/RX 6800

          Incidentally, the only card in that entire list on the AMD side that was their top end offering that generation is the RX 5700 XT, since RDNA 1 never got a big GPU. Can't wait to hear about the "many generations (generations)" I missed out on which have also been scrubbed from the internet.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            Blown. The frick. OUT.
            >mfw I remember how fricking dominating the HD 4 and 5 series were

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              The 7000s were nice, but were the start of AMD really pumping dem volts into the high end to stay competitive pre-Pascal, a Sapphire 7970 is probably the worst card I've ever owned in terms of reliability. The button on the card let you switch between
              >really high stock overvolt
              Or
              >VRM toastingly moronic overvolt with 8% OC
              I had to bake that fricker back to life multiple times, which sucks, because that card was a fricking beast. And then Catalyst transitioned to Crimson, and after a bunch of really bad AMD replacements, my Fury X became a 1080 ti

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            It tickles me to see the big boi tahiti chip on the list twice.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            I am forgotten

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              We seriously no shit need HBM on future GPUs if we wanna solve the VRAM/high resolution crisis. Fury was a terrible showcase of HBM, but the HBM itself let it punch a lot higher than it should've, speed, bandwidth, and timings are insane, but 4 FRICKING GIGS ON THE CARD THAT WAS SUPPOSED TO SHOWCASE HBM. I couldn't run Mankind Divided at all on that thing without turning everything down to very noticeable medium-high compromise settings, and it also released during the move to Crimson, games just didn't fricking work, the control panel never applied settings. The 400s and 500s ran circles around it just because they had 8 and 12GB, 4GB sealed it's fate, and Nvidia hoards it for data center and AI bullshit

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Ampere/RDNA 2 - RTX 3070/RX 6800
            6700xt is enough to BTFO 3070.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      At this point i would wait for Battlemage. Intel At least is going to try and give a frick.

  61. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Dude you NEED to have 12GB minimum to play these trash ports with bloated hardware requirements and shit tier optimization!

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Here's the rub amigo, if you are playing the "well optimised" games you don't need a 4060 or 4070 either so you are getting fricked twice.

  62. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >the 4060Ti 16gig is only 60 bucks cheaper than the 4070 in my country
    Ok Nvidiarrhea

  63. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Was considering getting the 4060 ti 8gb instead of the 4070 because of how much cheaper it will be but the performance gap will probably be way bigger than 3060 ti vs 3070
    I don't really play new AAA games that need a lot of vram but would like to max out some older titles at 1440p while getting over 100 fps

  64. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Hey guys I got 4070ti for 4K is it good? It was 900 euros

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      For AAA trash only with DLSS enabled, otherwise yes.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Sorry but not really, honestly.
      I don't see why you'd pay so much more for the same amount of ram as the base 4070.
      If you were gonna spend close to 1000 bucks on a card you should just go for the 4080 honestly.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >4070ti for 4K
      Don't do it bro.

  65. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Useless RTX crap
    not paying for that. give me actual GPU power, why would I waste my money on gimmicks I won't use most of the time? RTX should be an optional thing and the RTX chip should be a general thing that provides power for all games even without RTX.

    AMD card atleast have more power for texture and shit, instead of wasting it on raytracing.

  66. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Reminder: 4090.

  67. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    lel, keep buying recycled crap with gaytracing shovelware

  68. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >RTX 3060
    >12 GB
    >RTX 4060
    >8 GB

    lol terrible decision making, NVIDiA are fricking moronic

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Why is it terrible decision?
      homosexuals will still buy those.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Would have sold much more by adding a little VRAM. terrible decision making

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          But then they would have to raise the price making those cards DOA even more than they already are.
          3060 also has 8GB version.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            But adding 6 gb ram is not expensive. VRAM is one of the most important people characterisistics that plebs pay attention to when buying cards, they will absolutely buy a card over another one, or not buy it because becaus of few gigs of vram.
            If olds cards have more VRAM they wont buy this one. this deal is not better than used 3060 12 GB. if your new cards is not better than buying old used shit then its not a good product

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              The only other configuration possible for 4060 would be 16GB and as you can see nV is asking steep price for additional 8GB of VRAM.
              4060 is 1080p card at best, low end gamers don't have high standards but they care about the price more.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                what do you mean low end, this is not a low end card, it runs the games. 400 may be low end for crazy prices but for people 400$ is still a lot because they dont live in a GPU world with new gpu prices, they live in a real world where they pay their bills. people who are not willing to spend a lot of more money but tech savvy enough to build their PC and buy a single GPU are actually quite picky and try to go for the best gpu power per dollar.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                4060 is low end card, 4050 whenever it will launch will be entry level GPU for this generation, just because we don't get many $250 GPUs anymore doesn't change that.
                Buying low end hardware is stupid even if you are poor because those GPUs age poorly.
                If you can't afford $400 every 3-4 years you need to stop playing games and invest in yourself.
                Gaming as a hobby is very cheap it's the main reason why it's so popular.
                I'm lucky to be youropoor, I can just move to another country whenever I like.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Buying low end hardware is stupid even if you are poor because those GPUs age poorly
                Tell that to my GTX950 that still plays everything I want to play.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >everything I want to play.
                This is coping mechanism, I know this well. Once you taste freedom you won't be able to go back.
                I used to raid in wow with sub-10FPS, I would consider this now unplayable.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                You actually are a paid shill, aren't you. Nobody can be this stupid. Go compare Vanilla WoW spec requirements to Classic. It's a fricking joke.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                What are you even talking about?
                I'm just saying that when I had shit hardware and I were younger I could accept shit gaming experience and now I would not enjoy that even a bit.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                but we do, rx 6600 is a 3060 equivalent and costs 240 bucks new + a free game (right now it is sold with the last of us 1), in NEW condition of course, in France (so not a cheap country), probably even less in the US

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                nGreedia has near monopoly, many homosexuals don't even know AyyMD sells GPUs.
                Gaming laptops are also very popular among normalgays and those very rarely come with Radeon as well.
                But yea 6600 is good enough if you enjoy sub-cucksole experience.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Buying low end hardware is stupid even if you are poor because those GPUs age poorly.
                Once upon time there were sweet spot GPUs in every gen usually around mid tier.
                Like the reasonable priced option that performs ok.
                It was 1060 6GB, RX 570 4GB, 750ti, R9 270X, HD5750 (same chip as 5770) 8800gt 512MB..

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Yes that was the case. You can still play 95%+ of the games on older hardware. I would remove 750Ti from your list it was trash from the beginning.
                It's just games are made to run on cucksoles first, plus any corporation just cares about profit. So if customers can keep their hardware for long they miss out on sales.
                If you are fine with 1080p 60FPS you don't need to upgrade often.
                I'm just elitist prick, that's all.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                750ti was real cheap used and performed well over what people paid.
                Like if you could buy 1050ti at $50 or 3050 at $100

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                It came so late it was super slow card, 9xx series was launching a few months later. I know nV skipped 8xx cards on desktop.
                It was poor value, used market is separate thing because it varies drastically from country to country. Even now morons are trying to sell 750Ti's close to the price of rx570.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Theres millions upon millions of them for a reason.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                it was literally a launch card for the Maxwell series
                its best strength was requiring no auxiliary GPU power and enabling normies to slot it into any kind of existing or second hand Walmart tier PC and get a comparable experience to consoles

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Every 40 series card except maybe the 4090 is selling like shit and nvidia is starting to feel the pinch as shown by the very slight price drops and slowing of production. Everybody just has to keep on being patient.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          lol, they gonna raise prices on 970 x10 when 5090 is goes out, keep feeding those buttholes.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          AMD needs to pick up the slack and bring some more competition for everyone's benefit.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            The stunt they pulled with the RX 580 and Hogwarts Legacy has ensured they will never get my money again. Intel is my only hope.

  69. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >8gb
    >400 dollerydoos
    >can't even run RE4 remake at 1080p maxed out

    LMAO the only thing nVidia is healing is its wallet you daft morons

  70. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    It's for pleb 1080p, at that point just get a fricking console or laptop it's all the same shit

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >at that point just get a fricking console or laptop it's all the same shit
      Are you zoomer or something? Even worst GPU is better than console trash.

  71. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    If you need a cheap GPU, you can get a new RX 6600 (RTX 3060 equivalent) for 250 bucks. Don't waste your money with israelitevidia.

  72. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    bought a 6800xt and waitgayging for 5000 lineu. this generation is a wash, just save-up a $1000-$1200 for next gen. in a year or two get 2x32GB DDR5, 14th gen intel CPU+mobo, 4th gen NVME and your good until 2029.

  73. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    figured I'd ask here.

    I've been using a nvidia 1660 TI for ages and it's really showing its age at this point. Are there any graphics cards that are decently priced that I should aim for? I do like to play modern releases.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      What resolution and framerate do you want? Do you care about raytracing and DLSS?

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        1080p and a nice constant 60fps, raytracing would be nice yeah, DLSS I could take or leave.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          Just get a 4060 then. Although if you also have an ancient CPU you might want to consider an upgrade on that too so it doesn't bottleneck your card.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          >1080p60fps
          Is 1660 not enough for that? I used 970 for 100 fps just few years ago.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      rx 6600, best cost per frame

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Just get a 4060 then. Although if you also have an ancient CPU you might want to consider an upgrade on that too so it doesn't bottleneck your card.

        alright, looking into those, thanks for the help anons.

  74. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    I'm about to pull the trigger, but need to know: 4070 for 1440p for the next 5 years. Too much or just enough?

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      IMO any form of upscaling looks horrible on 1440p, supposedly it's better on 4K. I would look at native performance numbers and keep that in mind.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      I think it's enough if you don't plan on playing the latest AAA games at max settings for the next 5 years because of the vram meme. If you're targeting 60 fps then yes, it's definitely good enough maybe even slightly overkill but you'll be future proof.
      I'm personally considering 4070 for 1440p 144hz on older games so vram isn't much of a concern. I mean it will definitely run new future games but without ray tracing or some extreme settings.
      My bigger concern is how to go about my old A320M-A motherboard and cpu. I refuse to buy new motherboard chipsets and DDR5 memory.

  75. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >4060 ti (8GB)
    >4060 ti (16GB)
    Which one should I pick?

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Neither

  76. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    have a nice day Nvidia marketeer
    the only thing that is "healing" is your gaping butthole from all the anal fisting they gave you throughout the years

  77. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >developers are lazy and openly admit how they operate under the philosophy of just brute forcing their badly made games through
    >they blame the hardware when they can't brute force
    Of course they're both fricking the customer. There's no reason for Nvidia to israelite out on VRAM because it's cheap as dirt for them. Developers need to LEARN TO CODE and stop using Tim's hekkin' chonker shit Unreal Engine for everything. Also stop adding polygons to models, you've added enough.

  78. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Dude, 2070 was 499
    There is no healing, it's FUBAR

  79. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >4060
    >8gb
    >128 bit bus
    >$400
    >healing

    Nvidia shills are truly moronic subhumans. It's even more funny when they ignore the fact that there are GPUs out there right now with 16GB for less than $400 like Intel Arc A770. If you aim for budget and still pay more for less you are by definition a moronic subhuman.

  80. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    I have a 6gb 2060
    Would it be worth to get a 4060? The fact that it draws less power than my 2060 and that it's almost double the power seems interesting
    The only big game I play ln my 2060 is modded Skyrim and I have roughly 45 fps which isn't bad, other than that I mostly play older games from 2010s
    However the noise on my 2060 is bothering me when it's under load, so I had to put the fan to 45% under load and undervolted it resulting in a roughly 5-10% power loss but still...

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      At this point a 3060 would be a better idea.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        I would like something kinda future proof that will work for the next 5 years
        Might just wait for the rtx 5 series at this point, my 2060 is still going strong...

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          Battlemage next year with Intel then. They are actually going to compete for once.

  81. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >>RTX 4060
    >>$399
    >it's just a 4030 with a new name
    next

  82. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >$400 for a fricking low tier GPU
    are people fricking insane? I just paid like 550 for a 6800XT with 16GB. All for this RTX bullshit? Eat my ass, there's pretty much no games worth playing that take advantage of this unless you're a AAA goyslop consoomer.

    I bet the 4060 regular version will barely outperform the 3060TI while being more expensive.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      In fairness, there's a good reason why Nvidia can get away with charging this shit, since their GPUs are also now used for AI.
      Plus, there's the fact that they know they have consumers by the balls in terms of overall power efficiency, brand reputation, better drivers than AyyMD, and software. DLSS as an upscaling solution is so much better than FSR its not funny.

  83. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    sucks to be you tech illiterate
    pay the moron tax for the chinks

  84. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Had a 1070 for almost 6 years before upgrading to my 4090, definitely worth it

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >went full moron
      congratulations

  85. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >gtx1630
    >$150
    >rx 6400
    >$140

    this is fricked. you can get 2013 cards for free/10 bucks that have the same performance
    the Black folk just don't care about the low end anymore

  86. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Frick, 4080 is still not dropping price.
    Guess I will have to wait for the 50xx series in the next 1.5 years.

  87. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    frick the jannies

  88. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    didn't realize there's already a graphic cards thread, crossposting for help

    [...]

  89. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >worse than an intel a380
    Oh no no no no

  90. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Is it true that I need a good CPU if I'm aiming for high fps, and a good GPU for high resolutions?
    So that means I should just get a 4070 but a i9 with it?

  91. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    $499 aint bad if it can outperform my 2080 ti

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      It's trash if an Intel A770 is better at a cheaper cost

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Get a 3090 Ti or a 4090, otherwise it's pointless to upgrade. Or even better, wait for the 5090/5080 Ti.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        3090ti is very bad buy unless you get it for bargain. 4090 came out so fast after that power hog and made it completely obsolete value wise

  92. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Will there be a 4080 Ti? Or a 4090 Ti? Is this series officially over?

  93. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >8GB
    >16GB
    lmao I'll just get an RX 7800 XT

  94. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    > Worse than a 970 at 10x the price
    lol

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      How so? 970 was a card that could barely run Far Cry 3 on ultra in 1080p 60 fps. Your standards have just changed. You want everything to be so much more. Touch grass.

  95. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    How do I learn to recognize what computer parts are worth buying and what is outdated/trash/overpriced?

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Learn about basics of computing, learn about how programs are compiled how they are executed, then learn a bit about CPUs and memory, then find out what you really like doing with a computer.
      Like if you really enjoy some game, find out in what engine it was made, what kind of system requirements it has, find it running on shittiest lowest setting, find it running at the best possible imaginable settings and hardware.
      Watch a few videos about monitors and how they work and about their resolutions and refresh rates.
      So after your understanding of everything broadens and deepens you can understand each component better.

      I was lucky my favorite game was Quake 3, and I could even look into the source code and change random texture files and sound files and do whatever I wanted with it.
      Biulding some poverty gaming computer can also help you heaps.
      Like buy some shitty used office computer wiht some old i5 like the i5 4570, then add some old gpu into it, change the PSU, add more ram, add an ssd, install an os.
      Like waste $250 to $300 tops to give yourself a learning experience that can only come from real world practice that you do yourself.

  96. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    who cares about anything but Vram these days? People want AI prostitutes sucking their dick, they don't care about raytracing.

  97. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Gimped VRAM at 270GB/s when 2060 and 3060 had 320GB/s+

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Can you even tell the difference? I got 3070 Ti which supposedly has very fast VRAM speeds but I can still easily tell when it's loading in the textures for the first time.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      R9 390 had 384 GB/s bandwith with 8gb of vram in 2015. That thing was 330 bucks brand new. We are evolving backwards.....

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        It's because we've reached the limits of what they can do with current designs and nobody has any idea of what to do next. At least AMD has chiplets, vcache and infinity fabric to play with. It's almost time to do another unified pipeline and mix shaders with AI.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      1080 Ti had 354Gb/s and 352bit. The 4080 has a 256bit bus.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        I still think to this day the 1080ti was a mistake, they probably never intended to release such a powerful card for it's price

  98. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >128bit memory bandwidth
    Enjoy those stutters OP.

  99. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    That's pretty decent

  100. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Wooaaaahhh!!!!! I might upgrade to a rx580 after this earth shattering news. You cucksoomers really are something special.

  101. 10 months ago
    Anonymous
  102. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Black folk want the top tier GPUs at 200 dollars to play their goyslop AAA kusoge
    >in this inflation
    you'll never EVER get entry level GPUs for cheap ever again
    it's fricking OVER

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Muh inflation
      >Things are more expensive...just because they are ok!!!!
      It's called price gouging and you are gleefully going along with it

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        I'm not gleefully going along with anything, I'm a 1060 at 1080p chad and I'm perfectly fine with this turn of events
        >things are more expensive because they are
        yes
        you think you're being smart with that clever "haha gotcha" but that is literally how things work

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Nvidia can release cards without the RT gimmick easily for cheap but they refuse to do it.

  103. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    explain to me why can't computer works like this?
    Combine 1070 + 2070 + 3070 = greater power than 4070

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Just pay $400 for it goyim
      AHAHAHAHHAHAHAAA

      Diminishing returns with SLI and requirements of rendering frames in real time and needing the data from the last frame to render the next one.
      SLI and crossfire never really took off.

  104. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >low gpu
    >500€ + scam prices due to shortages
    no it isn't healing shill

  105. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    You gays will complain about anything

    4060 Ti is the same MSRP as the 3060 Ti and has a decent performance bump, or a massive one if you are ok with DLSS3. Keep in mind the 3060 Ti was released before Bidenflation really kicked into gear. Nvidia is fighting tooth and nail to keep GPU prices low and it seems only I'm smart enough to see it.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      If it's that bad, then they should lengthen the release cycles, and pester devs to stop being so shit at optimization.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >You gays will complain about anything
      No shit. Us gays complaining is literally the first and last line of defense against your corporate overlords.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Oh Anon. Don't you know that the multi-billion dollar globalist corporation is his replacement for God?

  106. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    there is nothing wrong with these GPUs as long as they're priced appropriately
    Imagine it was
    $199 4050 Ti 8GB
    $249 4060 8GB
    $299 4060 16GB
    instead of
    $299 "4060" 8GB
    $399 "4060 Ti" 8GB
    $499 "4060 Ti" 16GB
    Would anyone actually complain?

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      a little more expensive than i would like but no

  107. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    SLI was incredibly janky shit to get to work, and even then it didn't work a lot of the time from what I recall. There's a reason gamers gave up on it.

  108. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    1080p card is not for PC gaming
    It’s for console gaming on a PC

  109. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >8GB
    ngmi

  110. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    imagine getting mogged by a 3060 12gb
    vramlets will never learn

  111. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Can't wait for Intel Battlemage B770 24GB to curb stomp Nvidia shills into the fricking ground.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      you have no drivers
      you will never be a real graphics card

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >you have no drivers
        Literally gaining more FPS with each update running anything I want flawlessly.

        You on the other hand have no drivers, no vram and no video you shit faced Nvidia shill suck my veiny unwashed penis with left over smegma clean.

  112. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >$400
    >for a gpu that can't even do 1440p because of the crippling narrow bus
    Lmao. Not a chance in hell.

  113. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >500 USD for the model that isn't obsolete by design with gimped VRAM
    Bravo, nvijew, I will surely upgrade now.

  114. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Yeah, no, frick off you wiener smoking homosexual.

  115. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >memory bus as narrow as Nvidia CEO's micropenis
    >the cheaper model has the same amount of VRAM as my GPU from fricking 2014, almost literally ten years later
    >the model with somewhat acceptable VRAM for 2023 is the price of a midrange card while touting itself as an entry "budget" model

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >the cheaper model has the same amount of VRAM as my GPU from fricking 2014, almost literally ten years later
      Same amount, different type. GDDR6 is much faster than GDDR5 or GDDR5X. Not disagreeing that the current generation of Nvidia cards is a blatant scam (other than the 4090, which is fantastic but massively overpriced), but 8GB of VRAM from 2014 is a lot slower than 8GB of VRAM from 2023.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        not the other guy but
        if he's talking about an 8GB 2014 GPU, I'm assuming he's referring to the r9 290X 8GB, which had a bandwidth of 320 GB/s
        4060 Ti has a bandwidth of 288 GB/s, 4060 272 GB/s

  116. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >rebranded 4050
    >128 bit

    Bold move by Nvidia israelites almost if they want to trickster trick the budget NPC into buying it.

  117. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    my 3060 has more vram than the 4060.......

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Ah yes the new israelite liminal degrade gpus.

      Nvidia wants you to downgrade to their dlss 3 blurry interpolated crap to use less memory so the gpus can mine secretly in the background on special hidden chips in the management engine

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      RTX 4040 4GB 64 bit

      RTX 4030 2GB 32 bit

      RTX 4020 0.5GB 16 bit starting at 899

      the next time I'm upgrading I'm buying a 90
      I went from a 1070 to a 3070 and it's just not good enough

      Rtx 4010 1gb 8bit

      Pfft nit havin a rtz 4910 1mb with a no byte bus what thr frick

      RTX 4000 - 0.064GB 4bit (previously 4010ti rebranded)

      kek

  118. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    RTX 4040 4GB 64 bit

    RTX 4030 2GB 32 bit

    RTX 4020 0.5GB 16 bit starting at 899

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Rtx 4010 1gb 8bit

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous
  119. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    RTX 4010 0.125GB 8bit starting at 999 but only if yu pre-order our custom dlss 5.0 package (works only on RTX 4010)

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Pfft nit havin a rtz 4910 1mb with a no byte bus what thr frick

  120. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    the next time I'm upgrading I'm buying a 90
    I went from a 1070 to a 3070 and it's just not good enough

  121. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    RTX 4000 - 0.064GB 4bit (previously 4010ti rebranded)

  122. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    My RX 6800 does everything I want and offers great performance with 16gb of vram

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      I went back to my 2080ti i just didnt need the extra vram yet and frs picture quality was ass. As well as all the other issues

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Can relate, tried AMD but something just felt off, a general degradation of image quality even in 2d despite using the same monitor and cables.
        It's really true, Nvidia is unbeatable in all aspects.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous
      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Actually I went back to my 6800 because it’s >10% faster than the 2080ti.

  123. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Rtx 5090 will be the same speed as the 4090 but twice as expensive nut has dlss4 which gives you a 4x boost in fps and res over dlss 2 but only up to a 2x boost over dlss 3

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      5090 will just be a consumer AI card.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        I dont even known why normies bother upgrading anymore anyway but lets pontificate on the card.

        Will be even better at ai rt etc but barely better in raster as they eill force new path trace shit to gimp their older gpus now that everything is good enough in raster even without upscaling interpolation shit

  124. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    500 bucks (650€) for a card that's probably fast as what? 2080? Fast as a card from 2018? 5 years ago? For 500/650e?

    It's DOGSHIT

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Its slower than my 2080ti stock which is slow as balls and costs almost as much (barely anyone bought one new so they got dumped on the used market cheap as shit either side of 2019-2022 for peanuts never seen them go above 300usd)

      NVIDIA locking dlss3+ to newer cards just to gimp the older ones is disgusting. Intel and amd will obviously follow suite with frs and xess

  125. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    4080 should be 499 by now. Just because they pulled their wiener out by a half inch doesn't mean they aren't still fricking you.

  126. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    It's utter bullshit.

    If the 4070 TI can match the performance of a 3090, then the 4060 TI should be equivalent to a 3080, not a 3070. It even costs the same as a 3070 at original retail price. And why, WHY didn't the 4070 series have 16GB of VRAM?

  127. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    128bit for 4060ti 16gb xDDDD holy frick thats so fricked up. the 3060 12gb was 192bit and 3060 8gb 256bt nvidia fricking us up badly.

  128. 10 months ago
    Anonymous
  129. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    N

  130. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    I

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      G

      N

      Nazis BTFO

  131. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    You don't need minimum 400$ gpu.
    You don't need boring unoptomized 3a trash.

  132. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    G

  133. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    The frick does the memory speed even realistically matter. If there is texture loading in then you will see it regardless of the speed. This is like those Black folk comparing 800:1000 contrast to 700:1000. You can't tell the difference anyway.

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *