Even goddamn israelitetube allows showing footage of animals fricking, but then again they also allow to post abortion footage completely uncensored - while banning family videos featuring breastfeeding for a split-second at the same breath
moron. Is a horse fricking a horse "bestiality"? No? Then neither is a pokemon fricking a pokemon. Bestiality requires a human having sex with an animal.
Bestiality doesn't refer to the act in and of itself, it refers to the paraphilia of being sexual attracted to animals. Drawing pictures of animals fricking, for the sole purpose of a human jacking off to it, is literally bestiality by definition. No one gives a shit about your personal head canon that conveniently ignores the accepted definition by literally everyone else in the entire world.
You're not only a dork, you're a fricking idiot, too.
1 year ago
Anonymous
You are a drooling moron btw. Words have meaning. Learn them. >Zoophilia is a paraphilia involving a sexual fixation on non-human animals. Bestiality is cross-species sexual activity between humans and non-human animals.
1 year ago
Anonymous
>Bestiality doesn't refer to the act in and of itself, it refers to the paraphilia of being sexual attracted to animals.
No, the other guy is right. You're thinking of zoophilia, not bestiality.
1 year ago
Anonymous
>conveniently ignores the accepted definition by literally everyone else in the entire world
reminder that WHO no longer defines homosexuality and transsexuality as mental ilnesses - I do not give a shit what the general consensus if if it's decided just by democratic votes instead of objective peer-reviewed studies and data from decades-long doccumented research experiments
Figured since they bowed down and accepted more Western artists over the past 10 years. It's almost hard to believe this was the same place where you need a fricking guide to create an account and log in.
>regulating literal fricking drawings
I guess visa/mastercard threatened to not work with them anymore. Same shit happened to tumblr and almost to onlyfans but the onlyfans ceo backed out when they realized the company would go bankrupt if they succumbed to visa/mastercards demands.
Apparently some dumbasses were hiding actual CP in novelAI posts or something along the lines of leading to actual CP trading rings in booths/fanbox. Credit card companies didn't want anything to do with that shit and laid an ultimatum. Everyone else not involved in that specific situation is collateral damage. pixiv could refuse to accept Mastercard and Visa but a proper alternative would take time to implement effectively. Doesn't matter now, the damage has been done and pixiv's reputation is down the drain for bending over for westerners
>tell good AI art
Pure AI art without touch-ups looks like AI art. It has a consistent characteristic that is immediately recognizable, because the algorithm that creates it cannot do anything but exactly the same shit over and over. Literally, the distinct algorithms have a "style" because of this, and it is easy to tell it came from an AI because of it.
Once a human touches it up, it's no longer AI art, so that becomes an entire debacle of its own.
>This update applies to certain transactions
so it's not a general crackdown but just telling people they're going to enforce the existing rules for the stuff involving money
the pokefrickery on pixiv will live
Only applies to buying the doujins and others that involve these contents
Aside from this, there's no big changes but I do feel for the artists who want to make money off their works on pixiv
Japs have been ditching pixiv for ages now in favor of Twitter, which is obnoxious as frick since it's impossible to just find stuff by a tag there. This isn't going to change anything.
the amount of people misunderstanding this is astonishing
when artists can’t draw the dicky for money like they usually do, they just won’t draw it anymore. this will affect how much of these kinds of posts will be made, and that’s bad—not to mention that credit card companies affecting other site policies should NEVER be a thing.
>pixiv banning dicky, fur and feral
Oh no! >switch to E621, furaffinity and inkbunny for yiff and feral >switch to Inkbunny, baraag and hiccearts for e-girlshota
Anyways
Lets be real now. It's nothing that stupid. Someone at Mastercard just doesn't like anything that isn't Ad friendly and wants it gone. Exactly as tumblr and pornhub were nuked.
You don't need crazy conspiracies
It's just the Mastercard israelites' crusade against any content that is not advertiser-friendly
Happened to PornHub, happened to Tumblr, happened to Reddit, and Pixiv is next on the chopping block
>cracking down on degenerate fetishes
Holy shit, it's tumblr all over again. Was there any reason to use pixiv over any other art site besides e-girl's, feral-shit, and guro? morons in charge getting rid of their primary audience.
>artist sells furry anthro shit on pixiv >pixiv bans them or denies them payment >artist sues for denial of payment >court has to decide whether anthro is "bestiality" or not
if nothing else, it would be hilarious
So do your payment through other means and just post it on Pixiv, easy. It's not a ban of the content, you just can't do it if you're using their paying system from what I've read.
Pokémon aren't animals and they are perfectly mature creatures that are willing to consent and love. Anyways, let's wait and see how they enforce those rules on pkmn artists
Tajiri said they're pets, so they're pets. Stop questioning Tajiri-sama's wisdom. He created this franchise, so his word is absolute truth. If he said Melony and Wicke were actually Pokemon in disguise, it would immediately become zoophilia to want to have an insanely hot threesome with them. Stop questioning word of god.
When the word of god contradicts things that happen in the world, like Zoroark, Arceus, Calyrex, etc, then https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Death_of_the_Author comes into play. And that's not even taking into play that his statements from nearly 30 years ago may not be his current year viewpoint
His statement isn't from 30 years ago. It's from his own biography that he helped with along with Ken Sugimori and Junichi Masuda. It's from a biography in manga form released in 2018, so about 4 years ago, where he clearly reinforces that view point and even gives additional context.
The problem with your point of view is that you are failing to properly contextualize the Pokemon world and the Pokemon themselves. Death of an author would come into play if the series itself was ambiguous about it and it is not. Verily so the bar is set so low, in terms of fiction, that the simple act of talking is seen as some sort of fool-proof way to dispel that viewpoint but it's not. In fiction the act of talking is very common place, there's plenty of talking pets in fiction like Scooby-Doo yet despite that he's still very much presented as Shaggy's pet dog. Likewise the series does a lot of things to build up Pokemon that way, and it has to since given their fantastical nature it must be aggressive in order to sell this conceptualization. Remember that Tajiri main source of inspiration was his own dealings with the natural world and the critters that inhabit it and Pokemon turns this concept but with fantastical beings.
Indeed the reason people fight over it is because how effective Pokemon is in their construct of Pokemon. See for example tweets like these:
https://mobile.twitter.com/ShitpostGate/status/1592319612800364545
Think for a second why tweets like these are made and why people fight, and support, these statements. As my fascination over the reception to Pokemon grows one must never forget how inane the concept of pokephilia is, it is after all the sexualization of what is essentially a magical pet like a dog which the series tries to construct via interactions and behaviors.
Maybe they've always wanted people to think of Pokemon as pets from all the way back then to all the way up to today. But if that's true, they obviously did a very poor job of it. Otherwise people wouldn't constantly be having these arguments. >Death of an author would come into play if the series itself was ambiguous about it
No, that's not the case. Barthes' essay is relevant regardless of how explicit the author(s) are about their intents. Tajiri could come out of hiding tonight, then run around repeatedly screaming "FRICK ALL THESE POKEFRICKERS, IT'S BESTIALITY" at the top of his lungs, and the essay would still be fully applicable. Not only that, but how many people have written for Pokemon? Dozens, maybe? Each with their own unique perception of Pokemon as creatures. The essay is more applicable than ever.
Except Oak said it in the first gen in both the English and Japanese version on top of that old 1996 pokedex book from GameFreak directly stating how Pokémon make better pets than cats and dogs. Even Takeshi Shudo took note that Pokémon are more obedient than real pets.
It's in no way ambiguous and not really open to interpretation given how GameFreak has decided to construct Pokémon and player interactions as soon as the technology was avaliable. Do I need to remind people that HGSS and BDSP have all Pokémon barking and chewing on shoes?
People are of course free to have their own views on fictional material but those views do not materialize in the source material, it really isn't open to interpretation aside from people who try to harken to real life, which none of our sources do, instead of realizing how fiction works and how concepts are presented and conceptualized. While it's true there's many people working on Pokémon it's structure is very coherent especially given how tight fisted The Pokémon Company is towards the depiction of Pokemon.
1 year ago
Anonymous
It doesn't matter what Oak or Shudo said. If they did a good job in portraying Pokemon as nonsapient subhumans, you wouldn't even need to be having these arguments. Obviously they fricked up. I know that hard for you to hear: the writers are flawed and they fricked up. But it's the truth. If they did a good job of portraying Pokemon in the way you describe, we wouldn't be arguing about this. They fricked it up.
yeah I bet mastercard and visa care about your stupid stinky cope >um, actually big megacorp, the guy balls deep in that blue dog... well he isnt practicing bestialty because of ... uhh... flavour text in some game you've never heard of
i dont think visa and mastercard care at fricking all, actually >hey jim, this guy is sending money to a known furry artist >why the frick should i care we still make money off it
There's nothing wrong with being attracted to anthro women. It's perfectly natural and doesn't make you a furry. And if it DOES make you a furry, that means there's nothing inherently wrong with being furry.
So what fits their definition of sexual exploitation of a minor, like is it just actual images of children which should be policed? Or is it just general cartoon characters, which would probably kill off their platform for the majority of artists since the same could be applied for bestiality counting for anything furry.
>people are reading a message saying that they just can't use Pixiv services for monetary transactions involving certain art and somehow getting the idea that the Pixiv is banning it from the platform from it
when artists can’t draw the dicky for money like they usually do, they just won’t draw it anymore. this will affect how much of these kinds of posts will be made, and that’s bad—not to mention that credit card companies affecting other site policies should NEVER be a thing.
the real reason for all of this is that for the last few months chinks have been spamming these tags with real stuff, to include some AI art that is a little too close to reality for some people's taste. So their grand plan to combat this is to just purge the tags all together.
Holy frick YES
Pixiv needs to be erased for being the literal most god awful site ever. >Garbage tagging system, literally as bad as the uploaded decides >Stupid gallery uploads with tags applying to ALL images for no reason, some character in some images completely untagged and untrackable >Not all tags translated to other languages, so some things you need to search for in JP
Hopefully they shut the whole damn site down.
It's funny how they covered 100% of their content under prohibited.
It's good news though, I hope people finally move out to other platforms, pixiv has always been moronic and painful to use.
>DNP lists to not upset paywalljews >Nuker hissyfit compliant / RetCons infamous artists >you need to register in order to see kemoe-girl
PermamentBooru it is then . .
The torture one is bullshit. What if I wanna draw a bad guy killing/mutilating someone? They're a villain, it's what they do.
The rest I cab understand.
I guess
I don't know what kind of double standards you need to pull to say that a character harming another is illegal but that same character harming themselves is fine
frick, Pixiv was already dying but this is the final nail to its coffin. Everything, including porn and fanarts HAS to be at the same place nowadays, frick twitter, frick israelites and frick jannies
in poland we have BLIK system, basically; open bank app, generate sms code and choose amount, enter the code, receive money on instant
Don't you think it's embarrassing that our shit hole has it but you not?
I have totally forgotten about that "totally not a scam to get more personal data from you" untill just now dear Anon, time to send some coffee I promised ages ago. . .
imagine getting btfo'd that hard by people who were not even defending pokemon on pokemon porn but were simply correcting your terminology
getting btfo'd that hard that you'd resort to this level of coping
I preferred insomniacovrld before they stopped drawing pokemon and went off the deep end with their awful pussy diving fetish. It's practically all they draw now.
In retrospect it should've been obvious; a whole lot of his art from the start had pussy gapes and/or obsessive pussy focus. Combine that with decades of desensitization and a lack of the real thing and this is what you end up with.
weird how they dont even explain what they mean by that even though they are an anime site.
is it only realistic looking human on animal bestiality or do fantasy ferals like dragons/pkmn with human anatomy and human uguu eyes also count. does solo feral count. does feral on feral count. are anthros animals. do drawings of 100year e-girl count or does it have to be realistic 3d. do shortstacks count or flat chested women. do they make this vague on purpose or something. im really curious to see what they even mean by these things. im asking myself if they plan to enforce this on regular site users one day.
Good. Pokemon on pokemon or bust
Still counts as bestiality
No it doesn't you puritan frickwit, go jerk off to ABDL or some other cringe fetishes that DeviantArt allows to get uploaded without spoilers
>he thinks they won't apply to him
LMAO
Even goddamn israelitetube allows showing footage of animals fricking, but then again they also allow to post abortion footage completely uncensored - while banning family videos featuring breastfeeding for a split-second at the same breath
>No it doesn't you puritan frickwit
Getting off on animals fricking is literally beastiality, you dork.
moron. Is a horse fricking a horse "bestiality"? No? Then neither is a pokemon fricking a pokemon. Bestiality requires a human having sex with an animal.
Bestiality doesn't refer to the act in and of itself, it refers to the paraphilia of being sexual attracted to animals. Drawing pictures of animals fricking, for the sole purpose of a human jacking off to it, is literally bestiality by definition. No one gives a shit about your personal head canon that conveniently ignores the accepted definition by literally everyone else in the entire world.
You're not only a dork, you're a fricking idiot, too.
You are a drooling moron btw. Words have meaning. Learn them.
>Zoophilia is a paraphilia involving a sexual fixation on non-human animals. Bestiality is cross-species sexual activity between humans and non-human animals.
>Bestiality doesn't refer to the act in and of itself, it refers to the paraphilia of being sexual attracted to animals.
No, the other guy is right. You're thinking of zoophilia, not bestiality.
>conveniently ignores the accepted definition by literally everyone else in the entire world
reminder that WHO no longer defines homosexuality and transsexuality as mental ilnesses - I do not give a shit what the general consensus if if it's decided just by democratic votes instead of objective peer-reviewed studies and data from decades-long doccumented research experiments
Good
>pixiv of all places bending to moralgays
Figured since they bowed down and accepted more Western artists over the past 10 years. It's almost hard to believe this was the same place where you need a fricking guide to create an account and log in.
>regulating literal fricking drawings
I guess visa/mastercard threatened to not work with them anymore. Same shit happened to tumblr and almost to onlyfans but the onlyfans ceo backed out when they realized the company would go bankrupt if they succumbed to visa/mastercards demands.
I really wish someone would knock VISA/Mastercard down a peg because this shit is getting ridiculous.
Why do they even care? How does it hurt their profits?
Wish I knew. I hear people saying that them associating with porn is bad optics, but they're so big that it 100% doesn't matter to anyone else
People say a lot of dumb shit, I could also say it's probably just someone in the company with a vendetta and that'd be equally possible.
BECAUSE PORN KILLED THEIR GRANDMA OKAY???
If israelites can't control it, they don't like it existing
Apparently some dumbasses were hiding actual CP in novelAI posts or something along the lines of leading to actual CP trading rings in booths/fanbox. Credit card companies didn't want anything to do with that shit and laid an ultimatum. Everyone else not involved in that specific situation is collateral damage. pixiv could refuse to accept Mastercard and Visa but a proper alternative would take time to implement effectively. Doesn't matter now, the damage has been done and pixiv's reputation is down the drain for bending over for westerners
Why not just ban AI then?
How are they supposed to tell good AI art from real art?
AI consistently makes the same mistakes because it doesn't actually understand what it's doing
>tell good AI art
Pure AI art without touch-ups looks like AI art. It has a consistent characteristic that is immediately recognizable, because the algorithm that creates it cannot do anything but exactly the same shit over and over. Literally, the distinct algorithms have a "style" because of this, and it is easy to tell it came from an AI because of it.
Once a human touches it up, it's no longer AI art, so that becomes an entire debacle of its own.
Sounds like bullshit.
Poppygays BTFO
>This update applies to certain transactions
so it's not a general crackdown but just telling people they're going to enforce the existing rules for the stuff involving money
the pokefrickery on pixiv will live
Just another avenue of buying porn legally from an artist being shut down.
>Dawn and Ash are 10 year old
>Act and look like they're 14 - 15
Boringgay
Good thing pokefrickery isn't bestiality.
Only applies to buying the doujins and others that involve these contents
Aside from this, there's no big changes but I do feel for the artists who want to make money off their works on pixiv
Japs have been ditching pixiv for ages now in favor of Twitter, which is obnoxious as frick since it's impossible to just find stuff by a tag there. This isn't going to change anything.
>Jap artist uses Twitter
>its 1% actual art 99% images of trains, gachashit screenshots, noodles and reposts with some random X-day hashtag
i dont go there anyway. everything's blocked by friendship or something
pixiv is trash anyways, them and their shitty paywalls make the site impossible to navigate
>fanbox getting fricked
THANK GOD
the amount of people misunderstanding this is astonishing
they'll just move to subscribestar/fantia
>pixiv banning dicky, fur and feral
Oh no!
>switch to E621, furaffinity and inkbunny for yiff and feral
>switch to Inkbunny, baraag and hiccearts for e-girlshota
Anyways
>switch to westerntrash
ngmi
Holy underage
I've heard a reason behind this is that the AI images chinks are flooding pixv with have QR codes to actual child porn.
>Chyna
I will not die for Democracy.
>ai shit is satanic in nature and malevolent in purpose
who knew
>AI shit bad
wow! who would have guessed!
Lets be real now. It's nothing that stupid. Someone at Mastercard just doesn't like anything that isn't Ad friendly and wants it gone. Exactly as tumblr and pornhub were nuked.
You don't need crazy conspiracies
It's just the Mastercard israelites' crusade against any content that is not advertiser-friendly
Happened to PornHub, happened to Tumblr, happened to Reddit, and Pixiv is next on the chopping block
smartest post itt
What was advertiser unfriendly about Pornhub that didn't exist before?
Actualy and unironicaly yes, also IRL gore was being used by the chink AI image generator bots in adition to CSA
Uhhh we need to ban sprays in TF2 because people are hiding illegal things in them!
It was a moronic lie then and it's a moronic lie now
>cracking down on degenerate fetishes
Holy shit, it's tumblr all over again. Was there any reason to use pixiv over any other art site besides e-girl's, feral-shit, and guro? morons in charge getting rid of their primary audience.
Pixiv's been shit for awhile anyway, especially once it all turned into AI generated smut.
>pixiv fell for the video games cause violence meme
holy shit, frick globohomo
>artist sells furry anthro shit on pixiv
>pixiv bans them or denies them payment
>artist sues for denial of payment
>court has to decide whether anthro is "bestiality" or not
if nothing else, it would be hilarious
So do your payment through other means and just post it on Pixiv, easy. It's not a ban of the content, you just can't do it if you're using their paying system from what I've read.
Why people are so moronic that they simply can't use IBAN?
Pokémon aren't animals and they are perfectly mature creatures that are willing to consent and love. Anyways, let's wait and see how they enforce those rules on pkmn artists
Tajiri said they're pets, so they're pets. Stop questioning Tajiri-sama's wisdom. He created this franchise, so his word is absolute truth. If he said Melony and Wicke were actually Pokemon in disguise, it would immediately become zoophilia to want to have an insanely hot threesome with them. Stop questioning word of god.
When the word of god contradicts things that happen in the world, like Zoroark, Arceus, Calyrex, etc, then https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Death_of_the_Author comes into play. And that's not even taking into play that his statements from nearly 30 years ago may not be his current year viewpoint
This "Roland Barthes" guy was probably just some nerd who was seething over his favorite book series disproving one of his headcanons.
His statement isn't from 30 years ago. It's from his own biography that he helped with along with Ken Sugimori and Junichi Masuda. It's from a biography in manga form released in 2018, so about 4 years ago, where he clearly reinforces that view point and even gives additional context.
The problem with your point of view is that you are failing to properly contextualize the Pokemon world and the Pokemon themselves. Death of an author would come into play if the series itself was ambiguous about it and it is not. Verily so the bar is set so low, in terms of fiction, that the simple act of talking is seen as some sort of fool-proof way to dispel that viewpoint but it's not. In fiction the act of talking is very common place, there's plenty of talking pets in fiction like Scooby-Doo yet despite that he's still very much presented as Shaggy's pet dog. Likewise the series does a lot of things to build up Pokemon that way, and it has to since given their fantastical nature it must be aggressive in order to sell this conceptualization. Remember that Tajiri main source of inspiration was his own dealings with the natural world and the critters that inhabit it and Pokemon turns this concept but with fantastical beings.
Indeed the reason people fight over it is because how effective Pokemon is in their construct of Pokemon. See for example tweets like these:
https://mobile.twitter.com/ShitpostGate/status/1592319612800364545
Think for a second why tweets like these are made and why people fight, and support, these statements. As my fascination over the reception to Pokemon grows one must never forget how inane the concept of pokephilia is, it is after all the sexualization of what is essentially a magical pet like a dog which the series tries to construct via interactions and behaviors.
Maybe they've always wanted people to think of Pokemon as pets from all the way back then to all the way up to today. But if that's true, they obviously did a very poor job of it. Otherwise people wouldn't constantly be having these arguments.
>Death of an author would come into play if the series itself was ambiguous about it
No, that's not the case. Barthes' essay is relevant regardless of how explicit the author(s) are about their intents. Tajiri could come out of hiding tonight, then run around repeatedly screaming "FRICK ALL THESE POKEFRICKERS, IT'S BESTIALITY" at the top of his lungs, and the essay would still be fully applicable. Not only that, but how many people have written for Pokemon? Dozens, maybe? Each with their own unique perception of Pokemon as creatures. The essay is more applicable than ever.
Except Oak said it in the first gen in both the English and Japanese version on top of that old 1996 pokedex book from GameFreak directly stating how Pokémon make better pets than cats and dogs. Even Takeshi Shudo took note that Pokémon are more obedient than real pets.
It's in no way ambiguous and not really open to interpretation given how GameFreak has decided to construct Pokémon and player interactions as soon as the technology was avaliable. Do I need to remind people that HGSS and BDSP have all Pokémon barking and chewing on shoes?
People are of course free to have their own views on fictional material but those views do not materialize in the source material, it really isn't open to interpretation aside from people who try to harken to real life, which none of our sources do, instead of realizing how fiction works and how concepts are presented and conceptualized. While it's true there's many people working on Pokémon it's structure is very coherent especially given how tight fisted The Pokémon Company is towards the depiction of Pokemon.
It doesn't matter what Oak or Shudo said. If they did a good job in portraying Pokemon as nonsapient subhumans, you wouldn't even need to be having these arguments. Obviously they fricked up. I know that hard for you to hear: the writers are flawed and they fricked up. But it's the truth. If they did a good job of portraying Pokemon in the way you describe, we wouldn't be arguing about this. They fricked it up.
yeah I bet mastercard and visa care about your stupid stinky cope
>um, actually big megacorp, the guy balls deep in that blue dog... well he isnt practicing bestialty because of ... uhh... flavour text in some game you've never heard of
What type of dog is this?
she's a sexy onion elf
looks like a daschund or however the frick you spell it
>capcha so close to 4gasm
sigh...
so close yet so far
i dont think visa and mastercard care at fricking all, actually
>hey jim, this guy is sending money to a known furry artist
>why the frick should i care we still make money off it
user to user they don't care, but when it's companies porn has additional regulations and taxes and all that shit
who hasnt heard of pokemon
Me
Yeah try explaining how Herdier isn't actually a dog
>DWD
that new Lycanroc animation is so hot...
The one with Salazzle right?
she should've taken the noose inside her crevice
True.
Nothing is purer than love between Human and Pokémon.
It only takes a week to get money, simply use N26 or DE/US/UK (Bank Account)
>bestiality
Is this it for classic tentacle porn? rip
they should ban all anthro not just paid shit
There's nothing wrong with being attracted to anthro women. It's perfectly natural and doesn't make you a furry. And if it DOES make you a furry, that means there's nothing inherently wrong with being furry.
So what fits their definition of sexual exploitation of a minor, like is it just actual images of children which should be policed? Or is it just general cartoon characters, which would probably kill off their platform for the majority of artists since the same could be applied for bestiality counting for anything furry.
There's no real porn on Pixiv, so guess which one it is
>Hypno dead
And nothing of value was lost
>people are reading a message saying that they just can't use Pixiv services for monetary transactions involving certain art and somehow getting the idea that the Pixiv is banning it from the platform from it
when artists can’t draw the dicky for money like they usually do, they just won’t draw it anymore. this will affect how much of these kinds of posts will be made, and that’s bad—not to mention that credit card companies affecting other site policies should NEVER be a thing.
Good. You scumbags need some policing. Fricking losers
Brainlet here, so are they nuking pixiv fanbox?
so we can still have gay sex art? kinda gay doing a half-ass job
the real reason for all of this is that for the last few months chinks have been spamming these tags with real stuff, to include some AI art that is a little too close to reality for some people's taste. So their grand plan to combat this is to just purge the tags all together.
>AIshit takes yet another
I fricking hate imagegen
Oh no!
Anyways
Holy frick YES
Pixiv needs to be erased for being the literal most god awful site ever.
>Garbage tagging system, literally as bad as the uploaded decides
>Stupid gallery uploads with tags applying to ALL images for no reason, some character in some images completely untagged and untrackable
>Not all tags translated to other languages, so some things you need to search for in JP
Hopefully they shut the whole damn site down.
>Looking for stuff was a little inconvenient for me so the entire site should shut down
It's funny how they covered 100% of their content under prohibited.
It's good news though, I hope people finally move out to other platforms, pixiv has always been moronic and painful to use.
>non-consensual mutilation
So uh, how do you make the distinction here?
come home white man
I prefer e-girl over furgay shit and e621 is severely lacking in that area. I'll just stick to the boorus and sankaku
>DNP lists to not upset paywalljews
>Nuker hissyfit compliant / RetCons infamous artists
>you need to register in order to see kemoe-girl
PermamentBooru it is then . .
>aww boo hoo, I stopped my toe today, time to take down all my art waaaa
The torture one is bullshit. What if I wanna draw a bad guy killing/mutilating someone? They're a villain, it's what they do.
The rest I cab understand.
What I wanna draw the prophet Muhammad having an intercourse with his wife?
It's not CP, it's historical art
Don't you wanna redraw the nude kids on the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel, too?
>non-consentual mutilation
as opposed to what, willing torture or self-mutilation?
Presumably like circumcision.
don't say that word, He might be watching us
I guess
I don't know what kind of double standards you need to pull to say that a character harming another is illegal but that same character harming themselves is fine
totalitarianism
More and more it kind of feels like there's no point trying to make cash from NSFW art anymore, it's gradually becoming too much of a hassle
frick, Pixiv was already dying but this is the final nail to its coffin. Everything, including porn and fanarts HAS to be at the same place nowadays, frick twitter, frick israelites and frick jannies
in poland we have BLIK system, basically; open bank app, generate sms code and choose amount, enter the code, receive money on instant
Don't you think it's embarrassing that our shit hole has it but you not?
I have totally forgotten about that "totally not a scam to get more personal data from you" untill just now dear Anon, time to send some coffee I promised ages ago. . .
Well Pixiv went shit as expected
Any alternatives with quality/well drawn content?
pokemon on pokemon demons (evil people, no matter how hard they deny theyre human, they are still) are delusional beyond belief
imagine getting btfo'd that hard by people who were not even defending pokemon on pokemon porn but were simply correcting your terminology
getting btfo'd that hard that you'd resort to this level of coping
dagasi...
Marimo was better, and sometimes still is
I wish dagasi only did cute stuff
I preferred insomniacovrld before they stopped drawing pokemon and went off the deep end with their awful pussy diving fetish. It's practically all they draw now.
In retrospect it should've been obvious; a whole lot of his art from the start had pussy gapes and/or obsessive pussy focus. Combine that with decades of desensitization and a lack of the real thing and this is what you end up with.
All shit like this does is make these sites lose money as people start new sites, or turn to other platforms.
>consensual mutilation good
>consensual incest bad
lmao
>paywall shit
who cares
weird how they dont even explain what they mean by that even though they are an anime site.
is it only realistic looking human on animal bestiality or do fantasy ferals like dragons/pkmn with human anatomy and human uguu eyes also count. does solo feral count. does feral on feral count. are anthros animals. do drawings of 100year e-girl count or does it have to be realistic 3d. do shortstacks count or flat chested women. do they make this vague on purpose or something. im really curious to see what they even mean by these things. im asking myself if they plan to enforce this on regular site users one day.