All it does is steal artwork to combine them into soulless abominations while risking the well-being of real humans. Do not buy from devs who utilize AI in any way.
Remember to pirate video games that utilize AI in anyway.
This phonograph "reads" a rock’s rough surface and transforms it into beautiful ambient music pic.twitter.com/PYDzYsWWf8— Surreal Videos (@SurrealVideos) March 3, 2023
inb4 ai shills
I already pirate from every dev I don't personally like, but people trying to make more with less effort deserve it more ig. Why should I pay 60 buckaroos when there's less cost involved?
Why do you play games from devs you don't like?
Or do you just download them out of spite like it means anything or sends some kind of message?
It'd be funny if pirating actually robbed money from the devs, but no I don't waste my time with devs I don't like. Regardless, I don't see how le gaymen industry can logically convince me shill out 60-80 bucks when the costs of production can only go down
because sometimes they do make decent games
>just buy those then
no you still won't get any money from me
>Why do you play games from devs you don't like?
Because unlike most lefties I can separate the art from the artist.
so you can only buy games on like odyssey magnavox or some shit
Yes. Only that. Everything is the same in the end.
Why does it show the person physically taking a slice from a cake?
As creative as they claim they are, they just can't think of a visual metaphor that doesn't involve something actually being taken away from them
>nooo think of the POOOOOR artists noooooooo!
cück. I will make more prompted art while you struggle with loomis.
I will buy AAAA games that utilize ai.
Yes do the needful sir
good morning sir
First there will have to be an AI game worth playing. Lol
>retarded braindead argument
the artists didn't invent more than AI did, they also took their inspiration and used already existing art (or even real life) for their own art, claiming that AI is in any way different just tells me you're scared of losing money because you're a subpar artist which can't bring anything to the table that a computer can
you're like a 20th century mathematician whining about calculators being invented, shut the fuck up moron
boycotts don't work
>what is hogwarts legacy
The real problem is that it looks bad.
It's improving everyday though. Consider seeing the long game here.
It's going from shit to shit.
Learn to code.
i didnt see the ai art whiners complaining when they stole the work of hundreds of authors of published works and fanworks to train their own ais with
Imagine being such a soulless, talentless hack that a fucking computer can fully replace everything you contribute to the medium.
What do you contribute to society that a machine can't do?
I jack off onto girls' faces while they're sun-bathing on the beach.
holy shit web artists are fucking hacks
>computers can generate images on their own
>they look weird, rough, and uninteresting
>But because its a new method of making pictures, people flock to check it out because its new and different
>artists lose their minds over something else being the center of attention for a bit
what makes you think i was buying from humans anyway?
>Spend hours, if not days to search out and find an artist to draw my incredibly specific fetish
>potentially have to deal with their mental baggage, wait times, and other artist horror stories
>pay for each piece
>use the GPU I wasted all that money on to generate infinite images of sweaty, hairy, embarrassed fujo NEET girls in fetishwear trying way too hard to look sexy
the choice is clear to me
Pirate? I didn't pirate. I used AI to interpret a new game that just happens to be exactly the same.
Where were you whiny art purist when Photoshop was created? Should painters use their fingers instead of brushes, for a more authentic painting? Where is the line on tool assisted image creation?
>b-but it learns from the work of human artist
So it's the same as any other artist? No artist creates in a vacuum. There are plenty of artist who are clearly inspired by and trained in mimicking other artist styles. Published art is basically free use, because you can't stop people from taking inspiration from it, AI is just a tool to speed the process up. AI will get better too, eventually it might not need to see other art styles, it might be able to create its own. If a few artist have to die in the name of humanities AI baby, then so be it. Shutting down AI because of artist feefees is stupid, the AI learning used today could one day to improve more important things like in medical fields. AI will never be able to run in the future if we don't let it walk now. You college dropouts aren't gonna take my glorious AI future from me.
One day you will grow past saying things you don't believe in for attention phase.
Remember this day.
sex with eresh and ishtar
Photoshop still requires you to know how to use it properly, and while you can make quick edits in it it still takes a good amount of practice and creativity to make something really good in it. Plus you're still actually doing SOMETHING, not just imputting a bunch of random crap and getting a full image.
>Where is the line on tool assisted image creation?
When the "tool" does everything for you and yet you still claim that you made it when you put zero effort
Putting in prompts is effort, you have to come up with the vision for the art to begin with.
Lmao. You putting in [fantasy drawing high quality 4k 8k hd oil on canvas professional artwork (insert name of random artist you found on google)] is supposed to take "skill" or "effort"? Go ahead, say that its something you can "master" again I need a quick laugh
Stop malding bro, do you need AI to draw you with hair?
So you think generating good AI images requires no effort or skill?
if you want the point to be about skill or effort then complain about that. don't complain about theft when you and I both know that every artist under the fucking sun steals ideas from everyone else in order to make their content without crediting them.
the second that AI can produce something better than the soulless slop that modern game have become i’m buying it. if that ever happens youare redundant and have to find your own ways to cope, just like every other pleb in all of our recorded history who’s shared the same fate of being replaced
LEARN TO COPE
literally the same shit
Even if it was, it's not the same legally and never will be. NN weights and output are a derived work of the copyrighted data they were trained with, by law. There will never be a special exception for machine "learning," nor should there be.
Wrong. Everything that the AI does is protected by law. Taking inspiration from another picture is not and will never bee a copyright violation. The only way to make copyright violations with AI is by purposely ordering the AI to do it.
Only humans can take inspiration, grifter
Only humans can be accused of copying and stealing too. AI is just a tool, it hurts nobody on it own.
Not for long, gay. AI has been spitting out exact copies of its input pictures if the prompts get too specific. That may work on art school failsons who can only write sad articles but it's only a matter of time before some big litigious hairtrigger psycho gets involved (e.g. Getty images). Copyright laws in the US are extremely fucked (and thus the rest of the world must follow suit) - you can't carve out special exceptions for robots doing what would be very illegal for humans except faster.
> you can't carve out special exceptions for robots doing what would be very illegal for humans except faster
and yet we have to. AI isn't going to go away. We can bury our heads and say it's not fair, but the better use of time would be figuring out how we are going to live with it.
It doesn't take inspitation since it cannot get outside of it's visual library. If you feed the AI only photos of real life it will only be able to output realistic pictures, while all the ancient art made by humans when there was only real life to be inspired by was always stylized, and not realistic. Even when art moved to more accurate depictions of reality it still had intentional stylistic quirks. AI wouldn't be able to do the same because it simply remixes it's visual library, without adding anything new.
Cant wait to reproduce that in AI and sell that comic pretending I'm the author. Oh wait, the comic is already available for free online.
holy shit, infinite cakes
>why are people using this lo-co-motive thing instead of my reliable horse cart?
>nooooooo stop building factories, you'll make artisans obsolete!
My fucking artisans are always complaining about having no money because they keep trying to build furniture but will never outproduce my billion or so top level furniture factories.
EITHER PROMOTE TO A DIFFERENT POP, PRODUCE A DIFFERENT GOOD, OR SHUT THE FUCK UP YOU RETARDS.
the AI generated cake would be more accurate if it had a random human hand and an eye with a smeared iris sticking out of it
i'll pirate every game, chud gay
>All it does is steal artwork to combine them into soulless abominations while risking the well-being of real humans.
Same as regular artists.
Also that art style reminds me of that one weirdo with the feminist revenge fantasies.
>risking the well-being of real humans
Lol, lmao, I've been doing that for 3 years now by just drawing my own shit rather than have some gay charge 600 bucks for it, and my stuff's arguably better than some of these people who charge triple digits. Now that AI's here I can just generate whatever the hell I want and touch it up.
Perfect Dark had some good AI
>cookbooks should be illegal
>if you're a professional chef and you follow someone else's recipe you're literally stealing their livelihood
>replication through trial and error isn't allowed either
These artists are fucking retarded
it's the only thing you brainlets understand
The very nature of food means that the chefs' "products" do need to be constantly recreated
Yes that means the gay in OP's pic is even stupider than usual for using a good analogy
As a chef I am not entitled to share my recipes. If you want to attempt to imitate what I do then be my guest. But it will never taste as good as when I make it. You want to know what the difference is? It's a secret. Also I went to culinary school and you didn't.
>Also I went to culinary school and you didn't.
Aww, you're like a game dev who went to a game dev school. How precious.
>But it will never taste as good as when I make it
You mean it will not taste exactly how you made it. You're not the authority on good taste you fucking shithat
Artists are snobby pieces of shit. I don't care about what they think.
Yet you wont name these boogeymen artists, good morning sir.
Hypocrisy. Artist steal just as much.
coders consistently rip off works of others through copying already existing code, googling for solutions for their code problems, RL game artists steal assets, abuse references and straight out copy other pieces
source: 15 years on the AAA industry
Using open source snippets and libraries isn't ripping off anyone retard
Oh man can we keep this thread alive long enough for someone to post the cake memes? I know I jinx'd this thread by posting in it but come on, I need to see those cake memes.
oh no the poor generic anime artists won't be able to make commission anymore, boo hoo
maybe you should have developed a style that's more interesting than the generic shit AI churns out
All of humanity is a collaborative effort. Stop pretending like you are a self sufficient existence. Do your small part and we can all benefit together.
If the AI can mix and match all their cakes and still get a workable product from in, then it means that all their cakes were basically the same and only superficially different. Maybe they should create original cakes that can't be easily blended together with any other cake. Or at the very least stop being proud of their own mediocrity.
Why start every AI thread with butthurt, why aren't you making something instead of being salty?
Not even a new IP lmao.
We've had plenty of games in the last decade that don't use AI for assets but they just might as well. Human work is vastly overrated. "Artists" are aplenty. Most of the shit I've seen in terms of art direction is taken from somewhere else, which is not much different from what AI does, except these are real humans that nag you if you don't pay enough and will bitch and moan and act like they're better than you. The only complaint I'll get from stable diffusion is out of memory errors. You are like roasties complaining about fembots. I'll play a completely AI generated game over your garbage depression quest with hand drawn animations if it's more fun, gay.
People have very modern ideas about the role of the artist, that the artist is a TORTURED genius who IMMORTALIZES his own experiences through poetry and prose, instead of...you know...just another skilled laborer working in a stigmatized field.
You know, that attitude that doesn't do creative workers any favors at all?
>You get paid in experience, right?
>Will you accept this exposure as payment?
>Isn't doing it for the love of the art enough?
>But what's your REAL job Will?
>Like what I do? Check out my Patreon page!
But really, look at the word that describes Shakespeare: Playwright.
Not playwrite, playWRIGHT. Like shipwright or cartwright, he was a person who wrought plays, he was a craftsman. Shakespeare lived and worked before the romantic notion of the tortured artist took hold. It's a fiction created by people who had very specific ideas about the role of the artist in society, a role that Shakespeare the man couldn't play. It's the reason why Shakespeare's authorship question even exists.
>>Like what I do? Check out my Patreon page!
>t. artists that buy all their furniture from IKEA instead of getting hand-made stuff from carpenters
lmaoing @ your life choices.
I have no clue how to pirate anymore these days. I used to be on a few private trackers but got back from military service and got locked out of them all. What’s the go to now?
>another ai shill thread made through falslefagging
Good morning, sirs.
What is there to shill? Nothing is being sold here, you idiot.
>bloody bitch bastard you WILL redeem my important work at gupta professional imaging INC, you WILL pay for my services
Sir you cannot reveal our trade secrets, please do the needful and delete immediately
>paying for AI art
Oh, so you're just an idiot. Understood.
glad we're on same page. AI is great for funny memes and even personal use like wallpapers. it's the people attempting to turn it into a business (and also trying to copyright it's outputs) that are huge gays
show me a single piece of art from the latest 1000 years that is original
Good morning sir
looks like shit
looks even worse
aislop is only a problem for artists who suck at drawing
It's rather impressive for it to almost replicate how a human would draw a picture. There are more things right about the image than not. Second thing is that just over a year ago this would've come out much, much worse, and the AI is still improving. I can only see this being unimpressive if you don't realize the implications of what you're seeing
I see this bot post every thread.
No, you don't
No, you'd only find this impressive if you were a teenager and this was your first technology hype cycle. All new technology has periods of massive growth like this, then they face a hard problem (like hands lol) and they slow down or never advance.
>No, you'd only find this impressive if you were a teenager and this was your first technology hype cycle.
The exact opposite is true. Younger people will find this less and less impressive. The older you are, the more you've seen AI being utter shit. The progress has occurred staggeringly fast, and we're seeing the same with voice and video AI. It's getting better still, anon. You're not looking at the end product
The end product will never be what the grifters are telling you
I don't know who you're referring to or what they're telling me
Where is this grifting so I can take part of it
If you want to take part in it, get a Silicon Valley job. OpenAI ChatGPT became a top-50 website in record time because of AI hype, and now they have a paid version of it. It's in the interest of the tech elite to overhype AI because it's so profitable. Retards and normalfags eat this shit up, even if it's not good.
In your view, what would be good AI?
Helping with shading, helping with light sources, in-between frames for animators, it was so easy to sell AI technology for artists but tech bros couldn't help themselves and act like smug assholes.
>pajeet lists things that have already been publicly available for years
The best auto-shading and frame interpolation technology have been open to use by professionals and amateur alike. They don't get used because they're shit and don't understand basic human intentions.
This sucks so bad lmao. There are AI hypegays out there who can't see what's wrong with stuff like this and they're genuinely retarded.
show us one of your drawings anon
I'm not an artist, but you're right. In 100 years, human artists will be gone, all art will have at least one surreal mistake that a human would never make, like two knees on the same leg, and unobservant retards will cheer it on.
You honestly think that in a 100 fucking years the AI won't have learned to draw feet? Two years ago it could barely draw anything at all
I’m convinced these people are so desperate to disavow AI that they just ignore the leaps and bounds of progress it’s made and pray for legislation to block it in the meantime.
. No technology improves at the same speed forever. Many just stop or improve very slowly. It's easy to make AI produce art for people with a room temperature IQ. It's hard to make AI produce art for anyone who is even slightly observant. AI will probably never do it.
Not an issue, since people are on average retards that will hapilly buy shit out of brand loyalty and hype. You don't need to please the high IQ/high standards crowd. Just the porn addicted negative IQ monkeys.
>It's easy to make AI produce art for people with a room temperature IQ. It's hard to make AI produce art for anyone who is even slightly observant. AI will probably never do it.
As it currently stands, things aren't slowing down. The very nature of machine learning means that it will continue learning as long as it is being taught. To say nothing about the techniques and hardware improving alongside it
Are you genuinely underage?
I'm not even 30 and I remember a world completely unlike the one we live in. You're right, big new technologies have periods of massive growth, and when they're done, when (if) they eventually slow down, the world has changed. I saw it with mobile phones. I saw it with the internet. I'm seeing it again right now.
Computers and the internet made people retarded about hype cycles. One invention succeeded, but that doesn't mean they all will. Every single overhyped technology wants people to make the comparison to computers and the internet.
Neural nets have succeeded. We already have the incredible new technology even if it stagnates from here (no sign of that happening for now though). We're currently at the phase of finding applications for it, which are popping up all over in places no-one ever expected. Image generation, natural language, voice synthesis, a lot of this stuff was thought of as basically impossible for computers to do a decade ago.
>THE INTERNET IS A COOMBRAIN FAD IT WILL NEVER PICK UP NOBODY USES IT FOR ANYTHING OTHER THAN COOMING CLEARLY BECAUSE OF THIS IT WILL NEVER BE USED IN A DIFFERENT WAY
This is the problem with the anti AI retards. They're literally all fucking zoomers. They don't remember a time when technology like the internet and smartphones weren't ubiquitous. We grew up in a different world, and witnessed the change. To them, the jump from smartphone, social media connected society to AI is just minuscule.
Not a single technology made in the last 10 years has shown such immediate results as AI. We already have functional, tangible applications in year 0 of its wide spread use. It's not expensive, it's appealing, it's easy to use, hard to master, virtually no barrier to entry. It has all the making of a hit. Retards comparing it to fucking 3D printing that requires a ridiculous amount of know how, and investment is beyond brain dead. The push back against audio AI from voice actors, and art AI from artists is more proof than anything of its efficacy.
Good morning sir
Good morning ser! Do the needful and denounce the Talmud ser!
In 100 years, your kind will be gone. The generations raised learning how to use AI art will make their own art with it and nobody will miss you. Goodbye carpenter, goodbye blacksmith
hmmm, good composition, the body structure and hands look surprisingly dece-bro WHAT THE DOG DOIN
>indians and silicon valley shills think this shit looks good
>all the girls and the dog have deformities
>non of the objects in the scene make any sense
anon, being black isn't a deformity
>>non of the objects in the scene make any sense
>non of the objects in the scene make any sense
Delicious condom bottles
bro the feet are the wrong way wtf
what da dog doin?
i like the colors
they need to fix the limbs somehow tbh
in retrospective feet/hands being fucky by ai just proves how true statement that 'feet/hand ultimate test for skilled artists' is
>Remember to pirate video games
robotics are bad because they devalue physical human labor and make rich greedy people richer and the average Joe even poorer
>"Not ok we need to secure the income of those people"
AI is bad because they devalue creative human labor and make rich greedy people richer and the average Joe even poorer
>"NOOOOOOO MY HECKIN AI IS BASED FUCK THEM ARTIST"
Why do people defend something that in the long run will make them even more miserable?
>>"Not ok we need to secure the income of those people"
Literally no one has ever said that, except maybe in 1880
I defend it because I hate the majority of artists. A shame for the ones I don’t but sacrifices have to be made.
Yeah, that's why we banned robots and restricted their use.
Oh wait, no that never happened.
>industry has become more automatic and machine reliant as time has passed
>living standards and general wealth has improved alongside it
The genie is out of the bottle, it's only a question of gets to use it. Either everyone or clueless retards push """""""ethical""""""" AI use, a.k.a. billionaires will be able to buy terabytes of copyrighted works to train corporate AI and average joe can't even generate a hentai pic.
>Implying corporations don't have terabytes of copyrighted work to work with
That's the point, corporations have it, regular people don't, so they'll have to pay to use it.
the longer I live the more I think that communism(the old school not that woke shit) is the way to go
AI posters are just ChatGPT bots and third worlders shilling for tech companies.
AI artists = "I have no talent, I'm not putting the time to improve my skills, the machine will steal and do the work for me"
Why would anyone support these people is beyond me
And yet they aren't the ones worrying about the future, lmao
>Instead of utilizing it themselves they only seeth about it
There will be people left behind because they just stick with the old way. We've seen that in history so many times. They will just seeth and ultimately become irrelevant. Not that any "artist" of the 21th century was relevant to begin with.
I don't give a shit. Artfags can get fucked.
I'm sick of you talentless hacks crying about everything. If you were actually any good at your "art" you'd use AI to help you and not rally against it. If AI is making you lose income then go and get a real job you gays.
You gays still will not name any of these artists you totally didnt make up in your mind that are crying about losing income you stupid moron. Go get a real job instead of your shitty tech support scam office in delhi Bakhtar.
He was going to share his cake with everyone anyway, why the fuck is he so upset?
I honestly really don't give a fuck. I got sick of waiting for someone to make big tittied model women and so I made them myself and I'm getting better at it every week
what games are using ai currently? i want to see how it looks and what the gameplay is like. honestly if the gameplay loop is good i'd check it out.
Post ai pictures already
You are all blah blah blah about how good or bad ai is but nobe of you actually post shit
AI only benefits the consumer. It will force artist to bring down their inflated commission prices to compete. The current issue is we have more demand for art than we have artist. If AI can get rid of all the cheap filler art that society needs, then that will free up the human artist to take on more commissions for good art. Artist should work with AI to make their jobs more enjoyable. The smart artist let's AI do the boring jobs.
Smaller artists are upset because they simply don’t have the skill to do meaningful art. Their niche is drawing low quality shit for people with weird fetishes or insane requests, which doesn’t really matter now because the AI can cook up halfway decent shit instantly. Good artists don’t give a shit because their places aren’t changed.
AI is crap at weird fetishes.
>Demand for art
Can't wait for the manchild generation to be subjugated to immortal AI powered boomers forever. Serves you gays right for wasting so much time of your lives on retarded fictional shit
>Remember to pirate
Don't mind if I do
leftists really can't meme huh
Fair use protects AI. You can copy things in a lot of ways that are perfectly allowed under fair use. If art is used in a transformative way, you're nearly guaranteed that that is a fair use application. You might be shocked at how close some of those uses are in terms of how little transformation is needed for it to actually be used. It's not just transformative uses as well by the way there are other conditions that allow Fair uses of copyrighted works. There is no need for consent either.
>Fair use protects AI.
Not proven in court. If some twitter gay told you this, it's pure hype. AI will get destroyed when it's challenged in court.
It will. Have a look at these two images here it's an example of transformative use of an entire copyrighted work. Comic artist Trina Roberts reworks the entirety of Reginald marshes 1934 painting "high yellow" in the opening panel of Lulu's back in Town" in 1976. While it retains nearly EVERY aspect of Marsh's composition and figure poses, Robert's has completely altered the original work style and format. This is a great example of transformative use of artwork and it actually validates basically every single AI generated artwork that people have grabbed onto to claim that was copying their own original work in some way.
not when it harms the future or current market of the copyright holder
A law just passed a few days ago saying ai made stuff cant hold copyright at all
has literally nothing to do with what i said
Awesome. means whatever i make becomes public domain. meaning i can put amazing stuff out there because im passionate.
Drawslaves on suicide watch (they deserve it)
Stopped reading so I can stop getting mad about normalfag memes
If a single artist is reading this post please try training your own AI model with YOUR art and fixes the flaws generated by the AI.
AI is a tool much like a brush. What an artist has in benefit of using that tool that some people using the same tool is the ability to actually fix it manually. Use it to your advantage
SD makes me perfect wallpapers, custom made and completely to my liking, why should I pay you $50 and wait a month if it gives me something of equal quality?
that is stable diffusion?
looks good. as an artist it makes me want to know how to use ai.
Yeah, for any artist is another tool.
>implying that yaoi's hands don't give him more soul
Make me a better wallpaper
>prompt says "weapon on back"
>she's holding her weapon down next to her legs
I guess dealing with AI is like dealing with a twitter "artist" who doesn't understand a simple command, at least the AI doesn't whine and cry
Yes humans don't know what a back is
>I guess dealing with AI is like dealing with a twitter "artist" who doesn't understand a simple command
did you know that twitter saves all DMs?
can you give an example of a twitter artist doing this to you?
>those mangled hands
>that hair merging with the background
>'weapon on back. but the weapon is not on the back
>'full armor' but she is not wearing full armor
fuck mind spoonfeeding an artist brainlet like me?
what's the easiest way to run sd to make stuff like this. i have a 2080s
There is a thread in >>Ganker with guides.
If your hardware is not enough you can use colab and take advantage of garden gnomeglee's hardware
goddamn, thats AI?
Lol I understand now why artists are shitting their bricks.
Imagine that shit in a year
the meaning of "masterpiece" has been diluted to hell
>Yeah, for any artist is another tool.
Maybe if you're a clueless amateur. At best it can give you inspiration for poses. At worst you're swallowing the mistakes it's doing.
>adds a hundred tags to try to force correct hands and it still fucks up the right hand
This is a joke
>makes me perfect wallpapers
It's a shame with my current hardware I can only generate low resolution stuff. I'd be doing this shit all day
>masterpiece, perfect hands, realistic hands
>he doesn't have ultra realistic fingles
Honestly I'd say six fingers on the left hand is something that wouldn't be out of place for May-May
>Before AI there already has been shit ton of traced art or dogshit artists
>Even if AI gets super good, I know names of few artists I will always be interested and their names attached to the project will make me look at it. Something which AI will struggle
>One Punch Man original comic was drawn like complete dogshit and it managed to find success. There is shit ton of stories of authors which are popular because of who they are and what their art made other people feel. AI doesn't change that
>this board complains constantly about soulless shit that has barely any effort or thought put into its production
>consumes and worships something that is soulless and has barely effort or thought in its production
The duality of gays
Not a problem for me since AIfags have a worse sense of quality control than a Chinese bootleg toy manufacturers.
Don't confuse Ganker with silicon valley marketers that are trying to fit in.
I can't blame a machine for producing soulless shit. I don't have to pay the machine much either for it and it won't cry about rights and morals to me. While it has certain requirements to do its job, at the end of the day it won't moan about it like the average low skilled artist does.
If humans can only produce soulless rehashed shit why would I get mad at AI for doing the same?
Think, retarded retard with mental retardation, think.
good morning sirs
Doing the needful and rolling.
doing the dutyful
im gonna rooooooooollll
rollan rollan rollan
>"I don't think gaming journalists are trustworthy"
STOP SCARING ME!
I still cant believe Gamergate is able to live rent free in these peoples' heads.
That's clearly a shitpost.
I like ai art
I like human art
Cant afford good pc to make ai
Make human art instead
Why you always have to hate something if you like something else?
Zoomers don't mind soulless AI art because zoomers are also soulless
Here's your "soulful" human art.
It makes sense, people even fap to gobbos because they vaguely look human
You just need something that has big tits and tell the player it's his sister, and this dude cashed in on that for 2D
>zoomer thinks deviantart is the basis of all art
It's not your fault you don't have a soul, it's the fault of your parents letting the internet raise you
Oh please, get your head out of your ass, most drawlaves are creatively bankrupt money chasing tards who only jump on the hottest fotm.
Spare me your "basis of all art" fart huffing.
Pussy not puffy enough, do it all over again, and don't forget about the sweat and musk clouds neither!
>Remember to pirate video games
10-4 good buddy that's a can do
What's this about AI though?
My great solace is knowing my art isn't generic enough that I would be bothered by generic landscapes and anime portraits
Isn't that the point? Only the dime a dozen fotm patreon commission fags are malding.
>takes one pixel from every single painting known to man
>put them together to form unique art, based on the various styles across culture and history
>"YOU STOLE ALL MY ART AND ALL MY MONEY!" screams someone who makes furry art based on '90s movie posters
>silicon valley techbros get bailed out by the government
>immediately try force AI threads again
I genuinely just want AI stuff to be public domain so coomers can just make porn in peace and pajeets stop shilling nonstop. I genuinely don't want art to become as butthurt as the music industry.
why only ai made ones?
>artists for the last 30 years: GOOD ARTISTS COPY, GREAT ARTISTS STEAL!
>AI art happens
>artists: OY VEYYYYY YOU ARE STEALING MY ART
What if artists train AI on their own art (fixing shit as needed) then sell them off? Then draw their passions and ideas on the side, maybe even get paid for it via patreon/subscribestar? It's a win-win.
Why would people pay them anything if they can just train a model on their style and then touch up the results? If you weren't already established it's over, move on.
That would be ideal but good luck convincing artists now considering how much AI tech bros acted like a bunch of gays. Expect them to piss off a big company like Disney or Warner, they already pissed off Getty images.
>they already pissed off Getty images.
not getty images
You would be surprised how much they make with their images, considering the current lawsuit is going for trillions right about now.
People typing in prompts might not be artists butt the people making the algorithms absolutely are
>the well-being of real humans
imagine thinking drawcucks are humans lmao
don't you have more shit sameface porn to draw?
Good. 99% of modern artists are filthy communist trannies. Now they can experience the abolition of private property.
>steal IP characters to make porn of them and profit themselves through patreon
>totally not doing the same what an AI does
Honestly AI is just fucking boring.
What makes art interesting is that the artist did everything deliberately every line and color was a decision born from the experience and live of a certain individual and seeing how a artist crystallizes his own Artstyle is awesome.
>pirate Quake series since it uses AI for its bots behaviour
I just like easy access to mid/low-tier art that looks pretty ok unless you really start looking at it closely. Not like you couldn't fix most of the issues in any graphics program.
I will now support AI art.
AI fags are as annoying as the artist they demonize
>Do not buy from devs who utilize AI in any way
I will make sure i buy from every dev that utilizes AI.
I enjoy tears of chud and furry artists.
LOOK AT THIS COMIC, artists can't even draw this comic good, these are the losers you are supporting.
artists are fags, get fucked losers.
get a real job, drawing pictures isnt a job its a leisure activity.
boo hoo you have to work like everyone else 🙁 what ever will you do!!??
Now replace artists for coders
AI will be able to draw feet in two more weeks
I meant two more months
I said two more years
Just another two decades
Look give us two centuries
Back to your cage freak
>all these retards unironically thinking AI isn't the future because the very first publicly released/popular version of it isn't perfect
holy fucking cope lmao
the funny part is that stable diffusion is already obsolethe and there's already been 12 better models that came out since then and they can do eyes and hands fine now, and that's in the span of less than six months
you guys are buffoons and it's even funnier considering we're on a board about video games and yet you brainlets aren't capable of fathoming how exponentially fast things will grow starting now
Actually the current publicly released version is pretty perfect, they're not only coping but uninformed
Of course the fart sniffing "artist" draws his self insert with a fucking beret.
First they came for the farmers , and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a farmer.
Then they came for the coachmen , and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a coachman.
Then they came for the drawfags, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a drawfag.
Then they came for me—and was no one left to speak for me.
Bots already post anonymously in Ganker anyway.
It's never too late to learn a real skill.
Define "real" skill. Robots will soon replace even your best yellowskins
Learn how to maintain and improve those robots. :^)
>Implying robots will not be able to fix themselves
It unironically is. Learn to make friends with rich and powerful people or die poor
Communistic (loser) mindset.
How is it communistic? Did I say to redistribute wealth and hand out UBI, you fucking gay? If you can't navigate the social ladder and exploit it to your advantage you will just stagnate in the future.
and you'll deserve it
>Then they came for me
I hope they hurry up
It’s bizarre to me that Ganker is so split on this matter. It’s not like this shit personally affects you. Professional artists will continue doing what they’re doing. You simply have the option now to make some mediocre art of whatever retarded idea pops into your head instantly, with varying levels of quality. Maybe it’ll improve in the future. Maybe it won’t. Just use it for whatever you deem necessary or fun and that’s it for now.
Ganker are mega cheapskates anon.
That has literally nothing to do with what I said.
The problem with AI art is that it's flooding websites meant for human art. Even the AI hypefags, who think AI will improve forever, should be concerned about this, because the next generation of AI is going to be trained on datasets that include art from the current generation, which means current-gen AI mistakes might stick around forever.
Some websites have filters in place for this exact problem, with AI art separated from regular art.
AI cumbrain losers think their art is real art, so they'll never reliably tag their images
Not an argument
You will never be an artist
>go to search bar
wow so fucking difficult
AIfags don't care. They're like chuds. They want to pretend to be something they're not and force themselves onto other platforms because they know they wouldn't get any traction if they had their own platform.
What difference does that make? Look at how anime has been drawing human faces for ages now, using fucking cat proportions. Art itself is deeply incestuous.
>he fell for the cat meme
>is also irrelevant to the discussion
Yep, you're a retard!
That was an example, you autistic cretin. Artists taking inspiration or simply outright mimicing other artists they look up to is extremely common too.
The difference is that mistakes that humans make are soulful and mistakes that AIs make are soulless. Just look at
. You would never see art from a human so detailed that also has an constant ugly reminder that the thing that created it has never seen a dog in the way that you or I see a dog, and it just recreated one with a statistical model. Anime faces have cat proportions because those proportions are neotenous, which humans find cute. It's not even close to the same thing.
>constant ugly reminder that the thing that created it has never seen a dog
Wow, they're just like humans!
The picture you posted is an example of the kind of mistake a human would make, which is soulful.
Yes, and my point is that retards like you have devalued the word "soul" to becoming a synonym of "half-assed" and "low quality".
>which means current-gen AI mistakes might stick around forever.
But ai tards won't be bothered by it because despite all their claims about this shit "improving" they're still generating the same generic and deformed pictures. They don't care about quality output, they only care about fast and constant output. They want the dopamine of feeling like they accomplished something without actually putting in the effort. It's why they never stay in their generals. They're all doing the same thing of typing words into an image generator and seeing what comes out, so their circlejerking is limited. This is also why ai tards came up with shit like "prompt stealing" or calling themselves "prompt engineers." Calling these people grifters isn't original but it is always appropriate.
I personally always get a kick whenever AI shills repeat
>"VISIT OUT GENERALS, WE PRODUCE GREAT STUFF AND THE FLAWS ARE FIXED"
But if you actually go over there you see the same bunch of ESLs praising each other for having their programs generate abominations like this.
coomer brain is real and AI art proved it
>AI art proved it
Internet proved it before you were born.
Coomer brain explains a lot about the AI fags. They're so frustrated that drawn porn is often made by leftists. Now they think the power to create porn is finally in the hands of losers with fried dopamine receptors like them, so they're strutting around like their pants aren't covered in cumstains. Embarrasing.
>Coomer brain explains a lot about the AI fags. They're so frustrated that drawn porn is often made by leftists.
This is one of the most forced and delusional reaches I've ever heard. Get your mind out of the fake ass world of politics for just five minutes you brainwashed gay.
Explain all the seething about artists in this thread (one of them even let his mask slip and whined about commission prices.) Then explain why all the examples of "good" AI art in this thread bar one are of attractive women and some guy couldn't control himself and started dumping actual porn. You might not be a cumbrain, but most of the people who agree with you are.
None of this has to do with right/left wing bullfuckery, shut up.
Can you read? He's calling you a gay for bringing politics into this for no reason.
god damn the eyes, she's a fucking retard
Getting mogged by AI art is a literal skill issue, of course there's stuff out there that AI can't replicate but guess what gay, it isn't yours because your shit is unoriginal and has a style so boring and easy to read a fucking robot can replicate it. I'm glad AI art exists, now all these hacks making sameface bullshit can take a hike while real artists thrive on their unique style that AI can't read simply because there isn't enough of it, it's literally too original or styalized. I don't even know what he's complaining about, AI tends to have trouble replicating super simple cartoony styles like his, I love how he's blaming AI art when in reality he doesn't have shit because his style is dime a dozen line webtoon/youtube storyteller slop. He's easily the most replaceable type of artist working today with or without AI.
No humans well being is being risked by art AI.
How many games don't utilize AI in any way?
Even pac man used a pathfinding algorithm.
Why did he draw this instead of using AI?
Because he actually has talent and can create something an AI can't. Sorry but I can't say the same for other "artists" out there.
Hey a robot can't replicate his shit so it quite literally is worth more both financially and artistically. I don't care how you feel about wojak, that is the truth.
The kind of "people" that praise AI art also praise wojaks, consider that a moment
Wojak is the most goyslop of all memes anon
i pirate everything
keep seething gay
every artist was saying this a year ago
You know how to fix the world without any jobs (they're replaced by AI)? Kill all of the poor people. I'm not kidding
seems like a plan
You will be volunteering for getting killed I gather?
Sure, they'll break your door down and execute you because you're poor. That seems likely
Yeah. Includes you too.
I don't think you care much for the practicalities or logistics of such a large and untenable task
Sadly for you, it won't.
Literally anyone who has played music in the past 50 years is guilty of the same thing AI art is. You cannot make something from nothing. Every artist uses techniques, methods, and art styles devised by others. No, AI "doesn't steal your art" when it's trained on your art, no more than you are stealing other's art when you look at it and inspiration from it. I don't even have to defend this shit, you can't fight the inevitability of progress, I'm merely trying to save you the embarrassment of going down kicking and screaming.
AI will never replace real artists.
this, call me when AI can replicate artists like wolftang. because right now all i see are hacks who draw nothing but the same boring anime portraits getting fucked out of a job.
>Ass three times the width of her shoulders
It is literally already doing so as we speak.
I am a real artist and I replaced every artist with my AI tools
>All it does is steal artwork
If you can't stop someone from stealing something, you don't deserve to have it.
>AI cant be copyrightwd because of no human work
>do AI drawing
>doodle some dicks
>my AI product can now be copyrighted
not my problem
>Remember to pirate video games
Fixed your post
>tfw I'm just an occasional drawfag and don't do commissions, plus my style is only liked by a very tiny audience
I kinda like looking at these arguments unfold because both parties see art as nothing more than a product with 0 fun involved or sone ascended spiritual experience and think drawing is like working out or some shit, so all arguments end up equally retarded to read. With that said, I did wank to some AI babes a few times, but it still sucks at generating art of obscure monstergirls I like, so I don''t care much for it.
>I'm just an occasional drawfag
>don't do commissions
>my style is only liked by a very tiny audience
You're not a drawfag, you just make shitty amateurish doodles that people like for other reasons, likely humor.
Post your work.
>don't do commissions, plus my style is only liked by a very tiny audience
The cope from a failed artist.
>my style is only liked by a very tiny audience
That's a very interesting way to say "my art is dogshit".
Ai can only make art with basic and generic poses, if artists can't up their game with creativity and complexity they deserve to be replaced.
>Remember to pirate video games
Way ahead of ya, chief
I find it funny how the majority of artist are insufferable, holier than thou cunts. But the moment something vaguely threatens them or make them fey a little bit sad they begin to deflate into sacks of pity and "look at how sad my situation is! Feel bad for me! Looke at ME!"
Give examples of these "holier than thou artists" you schizophrenic poojeet.
I'll pirate whatever the fuck I want to pirate OP. And don't give a fuck about AI. I've seen you pathetic fucks using Replika and shit. You have a brain the size of a pea and you like trash.
All property is theft, kid
isn't that paradoxical?
Only thing I really care about is adding AI ART tag on steam
In a few months the entire fucking store will be bargain bin hentai games
hate AIslop being used for asset flips
love using AIslop for retarded images
>artists gays then: "drawing is too hard we want to use CG classic techniques are too hard we will just draw calarts"
>artists now: "NOOOOO AI IS SOULLESS AND CHEAP"
lmao anime and cartoons are literally a joke compared to shit we had 20, 30, even fucking 40 years ago, all because the artists suck and are lazy. There are no artists today that can or are willing to do what the Metal Slug guys did ages ago with technology and budgets that are leaps and bounds better. AI is a god send, they either compete, or the AI can at least recreate the work of the great people we had back then.
>There are no artists today that can
>are willing to do
partially correct, were there more 2d pixelart games being produced you'd get more pixel art
>or the AI can at least recreate the work
it does a flawed approximation of it, not a human flawed but an autistic robot's flawed. bevause most ai users aren't properly trained they disregard those flaws and will rejoice at a chinese knock-off. i suggest you look deeper because gorgeous digital art exists
I don't give a shit about "gorgeous digital art" moron. I want complete products. Something no one will make, but it's not cost efficient, or it's too expensive to hire the required talent for it.. The tech is basically in its fucking infancy, and already has tangible result, yet somehow people are dooming it as complete failure despite having a better showing than almost any fucking tech there is.
moron what? The fucking function of this tech is literally to create content by being trained on previously created content. That's all it fucking does. Are you fucking brain dead? There are models trained on classical art, and you think being trained on 80s cartoon/anime/pixelart is too far of a stretch?
>I don't give a shit about "gorgeous digital art" moron. I want complete products.
how quickly you flipflopped, your claim was no one is able to do it, and now you say "i-it doesn't matter if they can I want a finished product"
go make your finished product with no quality control.
>the tech is in its infancy
again you pray to the ai gods to solve your problems. next you'll wait gor it to do design, story, gameplay and get surprised it's a mess.
My claim was no one is able OR willing to do it, which is correct. Show me a modern Metal Slug with the original aesthetic you disingenuous gay. Show me a modern anime that's not a movie or OVA with 80s style. Show me cartoons as good as Megas XLR. Your argument is that some gay hobbyists on the net make some images resembling those styles. My argument is that PROFESSIONAL, COMPLETE PRODUCTS like we used to have aren't being made, because they're too expensive, risky, or simply not even possible, because the expertise wasn't passed down from generation to generation.
>AI can at least recreate the work of the great people we had back then
Do you have a single fact to back that up?
>bad art (ai)
LMAO THIS LOOKS LIKE SHIT THIS IS WHAT AIFAGS ARE HYPING? FUCKING BPATHETIC THEY SHOULD PAY A REAL ARTIST AND THEN KILL THEMSELVES AI IS SO SHIT AND SOULLESS AND ILLEGAL IT LOOKS TERRIBLE FUCKING LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
as an /ic/ fag I can tell you right now that isn't EVER where it stops.
The difference is that there is no good art (ai)
>b-b-b-buh it will never learn to draw hands or fix its mistake
You troglodytes are being proven wrong in real fucking time, let alone years worth of progress and improvement in tech. This is "the automobile will never replace horses" levels of delusion.
"oh sure you can have gas stations but what do you think is going to bring that gas to the gas station? a car? get real, horses forever."
Had the same argument with my cousin about electric cars, it never ends.
i've never seen an AIfag that wasn't either poor or stupid
it's mostly crypto bros who think Web 3.0 is real, grifters who just want to make money off the latest tech trend, people who have never had any level of art appreciation but suddenly knows what an artist is after using AI art (coincidentally tech adjacent, coders, etc), or permabegs
Fucking passing fad that Ganker flips their shit over while the rest of society moves on
In a few years nobody will even remember ai
I use one of those to do negatives of polygonal forms that I turn into super fancy cake molds for my cakes
people in my city go crazy for them, my sales went up by like 500% since I've started using them
I also use them to do brutalism concrete sculptures which also sell well
Awesome. Putting advanced tech into everyone's hands leads to creative things like what you're doing with it. I know some people print out replacement parts for everything from car parts to replacing a broken casing on X item.
It's sarcasm/shitposting anon
>It's sarcasm/shitposting anon
I thought as much, but these threads have addled my brain
>In a few years nobody will even remember ai
Every AI program endorsement is just shit repeated from crypto and NFT promotions.
these motherfuckers would be whining about the automobile 100 years ago
Why are people so hostile towards your computer making amazing artwork for free?
We're hostile to you thinking garbage is amazing.
Because it sucks in really obvious ways and it's making me worry that everyone is retarded and blind, and they're going to force this shit in things I enjoy, like video games
how do you know it's not gonna be better in 3 years.
From what I've seen, it's been a constant improvement. I know the hands are fucky rn, but what in a few years?
. I don't know it's not going to be better, but I'm pretty sure it will never be good.
>Find a song you obsessively listen to
>check out the album or artist
>none of it sounds like THAT song
>see youtube of AI predicting how hit songs would sound with only 10 seconds of sample
>envision a future where I can have 10 albums of the same style of music I love but the artist is too busy pushing the confetti cannon at concerts to do it
God its going to be great when I can just make AI fraiser episodes on the fly. Fraiser gets a Nintendo switch but Niles gets the OLED version. Marty is happy with his ibm thinkpad and daphne is still playing her ipad mini.
anon you might have the musical taste of an autistic 13 year old child
Tone deaf or you're doug stanhope Im guessing. Thats gotta suck.
The very libs telling truck drivers to learn how to code are now panicking over their patreon bux lmao
They'll just blame capitalism again.
can someone just create a AI DM already, I want to play tabletop RPGs, but I don't want to play with other people.
AI seems to be a good solution for my predicament.
we can't have that it will be used for sexing e-bois
One thing that I'm truly waiting for are AI teachers, imagine having a teacher that can adapt to your specific flavor of autism or deficit, and he never get tired.
Imagine a future where children will have their personal teachers, in their houses, for the price of a sandwich, fucking amazing.
>HI I MADE A CAKE TO SHARE WITH EVERYONE
>guy takes slice
>WTF BRO YOU'RE STEALING!!!!!!!!!!!!
The fuck is this gay's problem?
putting a pocture online doesn't automatically give you the right to use it, it's the opposite in fact, copyright is the default
>putting a pocture online doesn't automatically give you the right to use it
Yeah it does, watch this
for commercial or reproduction purposes, moron.
Learn english and specify next time you dumbass third worlder
AI will take all of the jobs in 10 years. NEETS own the future.
>finally the people with no discipline to learn a skill will be creating everything
Not a good thing
>Needing discipline to learn a skill
Why even when AI can do it for you. Just lie down on a bed and do nothing but consume 100 petabytes of porn and video games very specific to your tastes
>b-b-buh i spent hours making it…
get with the times then retard. go cry about it.
I'm using AI art to visually Hispanice up my D&D setting and you cannot stop me.
This is one of the few good uses of AI, so I won't stop you
i don't think anyone actually cares if you're doing it for private stuff like that, it's more of an issue if you're trying to sell it or pretend its not AI art
There is no point in trying to commercialize AI made stuff because it cannot be copyrighted.
hasn't stopped some nigs
There will be retards trying to make a quick buck out of everything. Doesn't mean it's a big problem.
Wrong, you can create something small by hand and have AI do all the content using the IP you just created.
You have to do a lot of art yourself if you want to train an AI model to create art for your own original IP using your own original art. And even then, I think the ruling was that AI created stuff cannot be copyrighted full stop because copyrights are only handed out to things made by humans, so the context of the creation doesn't really matter because it is still AI generated, which disqualifies it for copyright.
And if a human later edits or somehow polishes whatever AI spew out? Why couldn't that be copyrighted?
Because polishing what an AI produced is editing. You (or any real human) has to CREATE the work for it to be eligible for copyright.
Learn the difference between IP and copyrighted material.
>put a price on it
Don't care about copyright, as long I can make money, maybe the AI thing will finally break the copyright system for good.
What ends up happening is
>Put a price on it
>1000+ grifters descend upon you en masse, taking you to court over the ownership of the art
I don't live 'merica so good luck with that.
Every big tech/entertaintment/data company is literally using AI now. If you think for a fucking second that they're going to let a bunch of random artists win a court case you must be the most optimistic person borne this century.
>it's good because the elites are going to use it to make billions of dollars
This should tell you where you should stand on AI art
Who are you quoting?
It doesn't even need to be artists. Literally ANYONE can challenge you for the ownership of a piece of AI generated content because you cannot copyright it.
Actually... This is kind of funny, I'm going to start claiming other peoples AI Art as my own. The fuck is anyone going to do? Stop me?
Hey bro, if I can make some money off of the effort of someone else, I will. I also really need money right now.
Better be crypto, because that's the commie AI utopia's currency
of course, It's the only way to wash. I couldn't sell it legit, obviously. I might try though. We'll see what happens. This is a new idea that is forming right now as I read this thread.
So fucking what? Why does it matter?
What the fuck? How do you not see how the fact that anyone can drag you to court (including other huge corporations) over ownership could be a bit problematic?
Imagine if Sony couldn't copyright Uncharted, for example. They would be in constant legal battle over the franchise with their competitors.
If you create the Nathan Drake The character by hand, you own the IP even if rest of the content depicting the character is AI generated, no one else is able to sell it legally because they'd be infringing on your IP, which was not AI generated
I don't need to copyright jack shit in order to sell it.
Maybe, until I put a watermark on it and then use it to DMCA claim you and have all of your seller accounts banned for stealing.
Also, who the fuck is even paying money for AI shit? Like, what, you're gonna give some gay Patreon bucks so he can sit in his dark room hitting "Generate" on a billion pictures of anime girls when you could literally just do the exact same thing yourself for free?
>Also, who the fuck is even paying money for AI shit?
I honestly don't know. Some of these have dozens of reviews meaning that even at a cheap ass price the guy is probably making money by shitting them out as fast as possible.
Now imagine megacorporate level mass produced garbage.
Expanding on my point here
Right now you copyright something to make sure that nobody can steal your hard work for themselves and profit without your consent.
What does a world look like where you can generate a shitload of products but not copyright any of it? Bargain bin prices and FLOOD the market with so much shit that SOME of it is going to sell no matter what. Your costs have gone down so much because you fired half your creative team/managers watching over them.
Am I wrong? Is this not going to happen?
>i don't think anyone actually cares if you're doing it for private stuff like that
Yes they do, especially coom artists.
I love it when people try to make intangible things tangible, it was just as laughable when people actually tried to argue against piracy using this retarded schtick that completely runs counter to how the real world works.
>the power of ai art
One of the reasons aifags hide often hide their prompts outside of their generals is because of how ai programs keep doing things wrong or then opposite of what they type. I especially love it when aifags put in "masterpiece, perfect anatomy" and the shit comes out looking like this.
Are you saying I could take Donald duck and generate AI images that I can sell freely since the owner of the IP supposedly has no claim on the character being depicted? Moron.
Instant cake is objectively better.
AI can't replicate my artstyle because it's too shit to be comprehended by machines.
You sound cool, I like shit art like that.
you would not say that if you saw it
You don't have to show me, but you're wrong.
This one had the prompt of "masterpiece, best quality, perfect anatomy." Kek.
Masterpiece, good anatomy, short hair, Picture of raven from teen Titans, good eyes, red forehead garden gnomeelry, purple hair, dark_purple eyes, black_leotard, red finger nails, ray tracing, ~~*purple_cape*~~, city background, by artofwarrenlouw
Negative prompt: ((poorly drawn face)), ((poorly drawn hands)), ~~*bad anatomy*~~, ((mutation)), ((mutated)), ~~*deformed*~~, ((extra fingers)), mutated hands, (extra limbs), ((poorly drawn)), (extra hands), (out of frame), out of focus, blurry, watermarks, text
Steps: 35, Sampler: DPM++ 2S a Karras, CFG scale: 7, Seed: 2043226107, Size: 768x1152, Model hash: 38c1ebe3, Denoising strength: 0.36, First pass size: 0x0
AI art is soulle-
I fucking love this endless stream of AI generated content so much bros
>dat cumpooter fella took muh jerb!!!
how is AI learning art by looking at it stealing, but humans looking at art is "inspiration"?
dont ask questions, goy
Fuck your gay ass opinion. I pirate because I want free games. Kys Predditor
>prompt: 'dynamic pose, perfect anatomy'
>result: this shit
>No chubby belly
Into the trash
It can't make sexy nude e-bois so it doesn't matter to me
Prompt me a bunny girl right now ai bros, a real bunny girl not a girl in a suit
>endgame comes out
>"jarvis, invent time travel" memes all over
>suddenly everyone is pro AI
Very interesting. I will consult Ganker with this later
Holy shit! Eight cakes!
>"masterpiece, best quality, perfect anatomy, 17 years old girl, cowboy shot"
Lighting reminds me of one of my favorite artists.
>prompt new image
>fix hands and other things
I feel like AI would be be used by actual artists who know how to actually reference something and put it on paper.
Yeah, it basically reminds me of when DAW's started to become the norm. Nothing about this is going to kill actual art.
Yeah, AI stuff definitely looks good, at a glance, or for a just second, but if a real artist copies what they see on screen while fixing mistakes the AI missed it could be a very helpful tool for building that person's sense of style
>photorealistic witch holding a staff, perfect anatomy, perfect face
>masterpiece, good anatomy, good hands
Bitch got throobs
made for pAIzuri
>prompt " good hands"
>hides the hands
Is it becoming self aware?
A lot of prompts are pure placebo. Images aren't being tagged with shit like "perfect hands" when the AI is trained (though some custom models may do this) so there's really no point in prompting it.
masterpiece, 1 girl, muscular, good anatomy, good hands, extremely detailed eyes, shiny skin, very large breasts, wide hips, spread legs, short hair, dark grey hair, ~~*black eyes*~~, red bikini, cyberpunk, 8k, ray tracing, by D-ART
Negative prompt: Blurry, low quality, text, watermark, poorly drawn, bad anatomy,
Steps: 45, Sampler: Euler a, CFG scale: 22.5, Seed: 3841492304, Size: 768x1152, Model hash: 38c1ebe3, Denoising strength: 0.7, First pass size: 0x0
what's up with them heels bruh
All digital art is soulless. Just look at anime, shit since the 2000s
/ic/ is the least threatened by this because they couldn't draw anything in the first place.
The board pertaining to a subject is always cares the least about the status quo of that subject. That's why Ganker is full of frothing at the mouth artists, while /ic/ gives no shits. Similarly, once AI can actually make serviceable vidya, we'd be all for it, while other boards will have frothing at the mouth indie devs, and publishing shills.
/ic/ has been leaking like a sieve days after /sdg/ went up on Ganker.
Not surprising when they got raided by literally everyone wanting to get a (you)
So how is copyright going to be enforced once AI art becomes indistinguishable from real art?
It's only indistinguishable if you're a normalfag with no skills.
Isn't it already? What AI generated pieces of art have lined up enough to the point where it would be considered plagiarism?
Original creator maintains ownership of the original design. Disney don't lose their copyright over mickey because some school in Venezuela has mural with mickey on it.
As long you don't make profit using the original design, everything is peachy.
But somehow copyright is so important to all these patreon coomer gays even though their gig has no tie to them being able to ensure no one else can sell their work
>these patreon coomer gays
Meanwhile, aifags are shilling their patreons and fanboxes here.
Copyright over artwork just doesn't matter because patreon shit isn't threatened over the artwork being sold in ten different places by random people
With Disney shit it doesn't matter because the IP is protected so you can't sell AI artwork of Mickey Mouse anyway
>even though their gig has no tie to them being able to ensure no one else can sell their work
Can you try this again, but in English this time?
Can you aifags generate proper english? Also, you're the ones coming to this site shilling your patreons.
What i meant is, if AI becomes good enough to pass as "real" art, how will you know if it can be granted copyright or not?
How will you know if an actual person created it or a computer?
yes, i know. I'm talking about a theoretical future
It doesn't matter if a computer, a chimp, a banana or God himself came to earth to a draw a character, what matter is the contract.
If corporate Disney uses a machine to draw robot mickey, and publicly releases that design, disney owns the copyright over robot mickey, however, I think we should decrease the protection time machine assisted designs, in US, copyright has around 70 years of protection or more, machine assisted designs, or machine assisted works should have 5 years.
More like why does copyright matter if your doesn't contain your IP?
DO NOT REDEEM
All art is soulless anyway. Just look at anime.
>Just look at anime.
This, there's a reason why it's the first artstyle to be decently replicated.
NOOOOOOO CG AND CALARTS ARE SOUL AI IS SOULLESS DON'T MAKE US PUT IN EFFORT TO COMPETE WE WANT TO MAINTAIN THE STATUS QUO WHERE WE HAVE IT EASY WITH NO COMPETITION
>masterpiece, best quality, perfect anatomy, norse woman, mature face
this one actually doesn't look that bad, you could fix the finger in photoshop pretty easily. the right shoulder looks fucked though
>aifags prompt "perfect hands"
>they're either hidden or still deformed
>AI LE CANT DRAW HANDS!
Jesus, is that and alien or an orangutan?
>average drawfag tries to draw hands
>comes out retarded every time
>just avoids hands from then on
Yeah, right now AI is only better than most artists. Give it a couple of years and it will better than all artists.
>words, words, words, words, words, words, words, words, words, words, words, words, words, words, words, words, words, words, words
Don't care, didn't ask. Modern games are trash
woah mama, this is extremely close to being perfect, if only if it wasn't for that fucking hand
>if it wasn't for that fucking hand
and the micro neck
and the arm proportions
and whatever the fuck it is that is going on under her armpit
and the torso/waist existing in 20 different perspectives at once
>and the micro neck
>and the arm proportions
>and whatever the fuck it is that is going on under her armpit
>and the torso/waist existing in 20 different perspectives at once
pyw or fuck off already
>nooooo you can't criticize burned food unless you're a world renowned chef
I'm not even an artist, but if you can't see how that looks wrong in a fuckton of places you're either blind, retarded or extremely fucking horny
You think anyone fucking cares about how bad you think a big mac is? it made my dick hard and i trust that over any random fuck stick on this board and their retarded opinions any day of the week. I like AI art and I like real art, there's room for both in this world, eat shit and die.
As I said, "extremely fucking horny" was one of the possibilities. You can like bottom of the barrel garbage all you want, but don't get mad when you post it online and somebody tells that it is, indeed, bottom of the barrel garbage.
I'm calling you a gay nerd because you are one, nothing more
Got a fun story. I went to a restaurant yesterday for the first time in about 5 years. Supposedly the best burgers tri-state area. When I bit into this burger I was revolted. It tasted like a mix of bleach and clay dirt, slight hint of ammonia. I spat it out after the first bit, the after taste remained. Started puking on my plate because I was so disgusted. I told the waiter and guess what he said?
>"I'm sorry about that, would you like to order something else?"
what the fuck bro
>extremely fucking horny
Sorry fag, real men don't care about this shit.
>just gonna act like you never need to jerk off or want to fuck
Why are you dying on this hill you fucking retard?
anon who are you quoting
You because getting a boner over something constitutes as instantly being a coombrain to you
getting a boner over something that looks like an eldritch abomination the more you look at it constitutes being a coombrain, yes
Bad anatomy in porn has existed and serviced people for hundreds of thousands of years you insufferable melvin. No one cares about what you think
>noooo you must coooooom
Please seek help.
Will you help me coom?
The first time I fapped to AIslop I knew the time of man was over.
>AI is only bad at hands, because artists are shit at hands, since it uses them to as a reference
>Artfags: "HAHA AI BTFO"
How the in god's name can the AI do that but not fucking hands?
i don't think many people know how an armpit is supposed to look in various poses. It's much easier to tell when a hand is fucked up than an armpit, simply because you look at hands waay more often than at armpits.
Even though the pit looks nice, can you answer with a high certainty that it is anatomically correct?
Ai-moron, please run my draw on your ai machine to see what happens
Zoomers really doing anything in their power to not actually do anything that requires effort.
Since when has art and self-expression ever been about effort?
>Remembering that gay who painted pictures of Soup cans
Yeah, art is dumb. You can basically do anything.
We've peaked a long time before (probably around when photography was still being introduced). Now its all about how much attention you can make
Can anyone explain the actual issue in the comic here? The artfag has lost nothing besides attention, while everyone else is benefitting from an increased variety of cake. It seems to be a net gain from society if that fuck just gets over it and moves on with his life.
>The artfag has lost nothing besides attention
Pretty sure that's the big issue (to him)
Without being validated constantly his art has lost all meaning.
>The artfag has lost nothing besides attention
That's like saying that if you run a business, and someone steals stuff from your business and resells it, you've "lost nothing besides attention". First all, the attention is how the business makes money in the first place, and second of all it's not yours to take and resell.
I don't think that's even a good argument for a guy that makes comics though. As far as I know there's not any AI that can just generate a comic strip that people would actually want to read. Sure you could use AI generation to MAKE one but you would still need to edit/write the text yourself.
So what? Nobody can compete with you ever?
Computer, generate me a naked big titty indian girl taking a huge dump in a flowerfield found in Ukraine. It has to be drawn by Hayao Miyazaki
>masterpiece, best quality, perfect hands
Why did artfags choose pajeets as a scapegoat for AI art?
Both will lose their jobs, one thanks to ai generated art, one thanks to ai generated code.
Stable diffusion and Dall-E inventors are indian.
Latent Diffusion is not some Indian invention.
I've literally been making money collecting data sets for AIs and I don't feel bad about it, get fucked.
Imagine being a western """artist""" and thinking that your art is going to be used to train shit. Nobody gives a shit about you. You are irrelevant. Now go back to twitter and keep drawing anti-AI comics thinking you will ever have 1/100th of the relevance any japanese artist has.
Wasn't there a western artist that had made a lot of art for Magic: The Gathering cards that was really, really popular in prompts a while back?
Okay "Artists" show me some of your art that is completely original and isn't influenced by anyone else's work. I'll wait.
dbz was original
>dbz was original
>dragonball fans actually believe this
L M A O
Just look at all those artist who are starving because of the goddamn AIs! Artist like..... Uhhh
Much like pirating, the people who want to use AI never had the intention of paying for art in the first place, and the people who did have no interest in AI.
>all the attention desperate shitposters and passive agressiveness
holy shit this is elliot rodger levels of autistic envy.
i didn't realise internet was this envious of a bunch of artists who can hold pencil and draw shapes.
the more you learn
Meanwhile who's seething in the OP image?
>Spend years in school
>Giant debt to pay off
>tech replaces you suddenly without warning
programmers got it tough
AI fags are all people that wanted free art from someone and got mad when they didn't get it, or wanted to draw but they were unwilling to put in the effort themselves and learn.
You can see it clearly in the way they post.
Guess what gays, I really am trying. Are you?
Every day but not getting better. I still have fun though.
aight post it
I think the vast majority are people who are excited to use the new tech and immediately get called a pajeet/(or art Hitler if you're on twitter) and are doing some kind of kneejerk reaction by shitting on artists too.
Basically a bunch of loud fags shitting on one another while non-retarded people either continue living life normally or start using the brand new tech toy to enhance whatever they're already doing.
>pajeets in desperate damage control mode when the thread is in autosage
By the way, this is just another that Hiro and the jannies are in on the shilling since they allow anyone to post nsfw and explicit generated images. They know that they don't get their hotpockets from the tech companies if their "engagement quota" is ever disturbed.
So, next time you see an AI thread you can remember that you can post literally anything.
>this is just another that Hiro
*this is just another example of how Hiro
I do wish people would use in-painting more. You can fix most of the big issues AI has, namely hands, through a bit of in-painting.
Why bother when you can spend the time generating 10 more images?
>Luddites in full cope mode that this is the full extent of AI's capabilities
>Artists mad that their skill is being democratized and will no longer be behind an execution barrier so their primary concern is that they can't feel superior anymore, rather than being glad that art becomes more accessible
so now AIshills are creating falseflags threads?
lmao at the artists seething and coping itt
none of these gays even draw, i do and i don't even mind AI art. damn here's some real old shit from high school
what a retarded thread, no wonder Ganker is one of the worst boards
Ganker is the worst real board. Porn spam dumps aren't boards.
People who are too lazy to learn photobashing decide to make a program that photobashes by the pixel.