He's right you know.
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
He's right you know.
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
Okay so what
The only thing I care about beating is your mom's pussy with my wiener and that's been going swell
How do I respond to this without sounding mad
tell him your mom's dead to make it awkward
ok thanks anon
hey homosexual your mom's dead
>save scum because not enough dex to beat vidya
>delusions about fingering pussy
how I know you're a save scummer
infantile
STAR Platinum " za wardo" so Jotaro didn't really beat DIO SAMA?
So, anon, uh, hows middle school treating ya?
If you make it to the end of a game, you've beaten it. No discussion.
>caring this much about how someone plays a game
Imagine being this worthless
go back to twitter
if i fast forward through a whole movie, did i watch the movie?
yes.
i do not care about your rebuttal.
wrong
dont care, his argument was "if i skip through the whole game, i beat it" so i applied the same to movies
try not being moronic
fricking moron
but you don't skip through the whole movie, you fast foward through it.
modern fast forwarding is skipping, the video player is not displaying every frame
>dont care, his argument was "if i skip through the whole game, i beat it"
Are you actually factually moronic?
You don't skip through a game with the rewind feature. You still play through the game.
you're skipping the part where you'd ever have to face failure, thus removing the part where its a video game and not just an interactive movie
Is failing a game a requirement of beating a game?
Answer honestly.
there is no accomplishment without the possibility of failure
that did not answer his question at all.
yes it did you're just fricking moronic
moron
bet you anything mike wouldn't say a thing about using cheats in video games
You're skipping the parts you don't replay every time you load a save that wasn't intended as part of the game's design. This can make a game much easier, certain sections can be difficult because they contain multiple difficult challenges. Beating a section with 3 harsh challenges one after the other is a lot harder when you need to do them all 3 in one go than it is when you only have to do each a single time because you use an unintended save after each one.
Play however you want, but this is clearly cheating and makes the game a lot easier than intended. The intended way would push you into learning to play well so you can beat earlier challenges easily as you keep retrying challenges farther along the way. That is clearly not the same as beating every challenge a single time.
I'm confused how some people don't seem to understand this, it's so obvious
Literally the dumbest fricking thing I've ever heard. It's the opposite. It'd be more akin to, "If I missed a scene and re-winded to see it again, did I really see the movie?" Please Amazon Prime some rope and a chair.
>casual sees games the same as movies
Ignorant child.
by your own admission, yes.
Matei is a two-bit has-been desperately clinging to the crumbs of the heel slice of fame he already got served. It's not surprising when he says something moronic in order to generate buzz. It's also not surprising when Ganker posters keep falling for it.
Shockingly moronic.
>I rewound the movie at several points and watched it again, did I watch the movie?
Yes, you fricking moron.
Depends on how fast you were fast forwarding the movie.
Also if I rewind it at points so I can find stuff I missed, that’s 100% still watching the movie, which is a better comparison.
>movie analogy
snoys everyone
Yes anon, you watched it
But would you trust somebody who watched it at 5x speed to be able to tell you how the movie was? How it was paced?
kinda
speed readers can more accurately recall the text they've read then regular morons and they aren't even reading full sentences just nouns and verbs
What you're actually arguing for the intended experience by nobody in particular. And so, you must go one step beyond and ask the following: if you watched a movie in the comfort of your own home from your tv, your phone or laptop, did you watch the movie (in the intended way)?
What about music, hearing it over a shitty speaker that fails to give you the full experience of the music?
You didn't watch the movie, and you didn't beat the game
>if you wash an orange, did you wash an apple?
No moron.
oh yeah?
moron
You don't have to sign your posts here anon
>i read the back page of a book
>therefore i have read the whole book
It's more like
>read the book out loud
>if at any point did you stutter, misread, or skipped a word - you are forced to reread from the very beginning
Yeah you didn't read that book properly
>make it to the end of a game
>make it to the end of a book
these both involve MAKING it through, not jumping to the last part moron, a speed-run of a game still counts as a completion no matter what means you use to shortcut yourself.
a speedrun of a game doesnt count when you cheat by using save states
This. Discussion should've ended here.
moron
rewinding multiple times = fast forward
>rewinding multiple times = fast forward
rewinding multiple times = fast forward
>rewinding multiple times = fast forward
>giving a shit about how people you dont know play a game that you arent playing
like all twitter users, hes ngmi
Twitterposting is for gays, but he is right.
Using the rewind feature is almost as bad as using magic or summons in Elden Ring.
Just because you used cheats doesn’t mean you beat the game.
>the bait
>the reddit spacing
this is the perfect Ganker post
Why yes I use save states when emulating monhun and keep reloading until I get the drops I want from the monsters because frick RNG
You can use stave states and whatever else you want and just tell people you didn't. What are they going to do?
LMAO this fricking israelite is going to both cheat AND lie
Yeah I am, try and stop me homosexual
Yes we know he's a c**t. Could always tell with his miserable autistic ass on those let's play videos with james.
But he collects physical media so he's based in my book.
Ahh, another great day on Gankeritter
Imagine trying to cling to some bullshit superiority over a video game feature.
I dont even know how you can disagree with this. Save states give you an entire different feeling on a game that is designed to be tough. Do you really think Castlevania III is as good as it is if you saved at every little hard part like a little b***h? Games with a save feature like in PC games are fine, because the game was designed around that, but older games save stating will always be a thing morons use who cannot git gud
No excuse not knowing who Mike is unless you're a fricking zoomer. If you never watched AVGN you don't belong on Ganker.
Considering how avgn is absolute dogshit I'd imagine most people would be better off not knowing it ever existed.
Yes it's gone to shit now, but AVGN was a huge part of Ganker board culture for a long fricking time.
Then at the moment we thought he was most pozzed he came out with his 2016 video about female Ghostbusters and AVGN renaissance began.
It ended with the full release of his movie.
>female Ghostbusters
All he said was that he wasn't going to watch it because it was a complete reboot and more jokey then serious
Literally said nothing about not watching it because of women or anything of that like
James' is extremely PC because he's afraid of his wife leaving him
Yes, saying he wasn't going to watch it was enough to get gaming media, and new (not news) media to call him misogynist e.t.c.
For him to release that took balls knowing the backlash he'd face.
I'm 37 and I've been on Ganker since 2007. So believe me when I ask: literally fricking who?
>aren't i silly?
brown bricks mine crap inspector gadget, that guy
What a moron
Some games I savescum because it's just too much work down the drain.
Some games it's more satisfying to overcome the challenges.
Either way, the more you play the better you get so I tend to not savescum that much and just go with it.
>Twitter screencap
>literal who e-celeb
Like clockwork
I use rewind then I tell everyone that I didn't. I mean, how are they ever gonna know?
>implying this isn't one of the funniest and most iconic videos ever made
Mike's genius knows no bounds
I find the video funny, i just wanted to share it for the anons that didn't recognize him
>not https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q6GkwWw9W6Y
>retweet if you agree
even if it was the most based thing a human has ever put into words, i would still refuse to retweet it.
Anything I would even play on it I already beat on original hardware nearly 30 years ago. Yes, the early 90s were 30 years ago
Save states or rewind will ultimately sully your overall experience of the game. When all challenge is removed, what’s the point? I think if you just want to have fun and hit a wall you cannot beat, rewind or save state your way past it once or twice and go on playing the game again as it was intended. Tons of games were programmed terribly and we shouldn’t have to deal with some of the shittier points as we get older and have less and less TIME.
he is a scrub
"you must play by my arbitrary rules or it doesnt count"
Having infinite continues is also no different from cheating
Every modern game should delete your save after you die 3 times
>mfw you beat the game without save states
are avgn and mike still friends?
You're all acting like every game pre ps1/xbox was some masterpiece in game difficulty and that the developers knew exactly what they were doing with enemy placement and checkpoints.
>play game the "right" way
>have to slog through the same levels you've already beaten just to get another chance at fighting a boss or beating a level you're stuck on
OR
>play the same game with rewind or save states
>cut out the padding to do the same thing in less time
I know you guys are nostalgic for arcades and old consoles but come the frick on
>play hard game without savestates/rewind
>have to actually learn how to play the game in order to advance
>play hard game with savestates/rewind
>speed through everything without taking any of it in because you can just immediately undo any mistakes and continuously try one moment over and over again until you get it right without learning about WHY you got it right
Not gonna say you're a homosexual for not playing "properly" but you're doing yourself a disservice by playing with states/rewind
Unless you of course don't actually like playing games and just want to get them over with as quickly as possible, in which case go right ahead
>play game with savestates
>encounter a boss
>save
>die
>load the save instead of wasting time running to the boss from the save point
If someone is a moron who rewinds after every single mistake it's their own problem. The only games where savestates actually alter the gameplay are the ones meant to be beaten in one try
Still the same kinda thing, you're not experiencing the game the way it was meant to be played
Again, not gonna say you're a homosexual for playing that way, but at the end of the day it's just like how someone who played a game for the first time on "hard" mode will have a different experience and first impressions than someone who chose "easy" mode
Savestates and rewind is the video game equivalent of subtitles for a show
Imagine a guy said he could play a song but when he gets to a hard part he fricks it up every time, and each time he just says "hold on, wait" and tries that one section over and over again. He eventually plays all the correct notes, in between a bunch of wrong ones he says don't count.
That's what I think of rewinding in games, you might have technically been present to experience all of the content, but there's a very specific challenge that was designed and you objectively failed. You can say you finished it, technically, in the same way the imaginary musician made it to the end of a list of notes, but he didn't actually perform the song, like you didn't actually beat the game.
this is the analogy
Your logic is moronic then. If you fail a part of a game 50 times, and then finally get it, by your own logic you didn't "Complete the game" because you had to sit through 50 failed parts
He only successfully played the song once he did the whole thing correctly in one shot, without take-backs. Just like with games.
Checkpoints and extra lives and such are part of the game and their use is still legitimate, using external software to rewind your mistakes is not.
hes playing the game according to the rules of the game that apply to everyone. he started from the last checkpoint, which is the start of the song
you're playing the game according to rules you made up and only apply to yourself. you start from wherever you god damn please which happens to be the hard part of the song
cope homie. based frog poster nailed it (and your mom)
Did I beat the game if I saved my progress and came back later?
>comparing playing video games to playing an instrument
both of you morons should be flayed alive
its obvious from that post you cant do either
based and correct analogy
Yes, if the game is designed to allow saving. Leaving the game paused is also acceptable. Saving a state to suspend the game and using it only once to come back later is fine too, generally speaking.
>comparing playing video games to playing an instrument
It's a very good comparison.
so you're telling me that if i EVER died in videogame or failed a level ONCE then it means that i didn't beat it?
damn... i guess there's only like 0,5% of gamers who managed to beat their games
no of course not, dying and continuing is a part of the game like any note is part of a song, but ripping open the game to insert in a rewind feature to circumnavigate how the game is designed to handle death is effectively no different that turning cheats on
>It's a Mike "footlong" Matei thread
>Nobody is talking about it
Not everyone here is obsessed with other people's wieners.
Obviously shopped
imagine playing a board game and deciding you get to re-roll whenever you dont like the outcome, or you get to undo any past choice because you realized it wasnt the best choice
this is save states, you did not beat the god damn game
>y-you didn't beat the game for realises!!!
this is exactly the type of homosexual that plays games with save states and use mods that totally doesn't give them an added advantage in-game (they swear)
>you can't save because... BECAUSE YOU JUST CAN'T, OK????
In other news, OP literally can't stop sucking wieners.
I love the amount of seethe and cope this causes, because people prove it correct by getting mad about it. If they actually believed they beat the game, some guy saying you didn't wouldn't bother you.
When your only objective in life is to be as big of a screeching moronic butthole as possible, it's very easy to pretend you're the winner.
QED
QED
I agree with him 100%. And I'm a person who does use the rewind feature if it's in a retro collection. Did I play it? Yes. Did I beat it? No, of course not. I play out of sheer curosity instead of truly playing it though. But once I feel confident enough to play it without rewind I will most definitely do it without it.
i don't care how you beat the game, i will never use replay functions in old games for the self satisfaction of beating the game as was intended
>the self satisfaction
the only kind of satisfaction you get
brown bricks
I don't think I've ever played any of those games on my switch, but if I were to, I could not give fewer fricks what this literal who thinks
If you have beaten the game you will never be a woman
I don't care if people use rewind or cheats or savescumming or anything if that's fun for them. But I don't think people should be in denial that it changes the experience significantly and how much to allow it is a big part of game design. An unlimited ability to rewind time (which is what unlimited quickloading is) is a hugely powerful ability to give to the player.
this
using save states turns your legitimate run into a tool assisted run, and Gankertards are mad that they've been called out on it
And here we go.
We go from kinda stupid to full blown mind rot moronic.
you will never be a real gamer
Considering this thread, I thank the lord for the gift I have been given.
you literally dont play video games and just larp that you beat them like a fricking woman
have a nice day
This. I can only think that people denying this are baiting, because it's undeniable.
Usually when a twitter thread is made, the discussion is centered around the person who posted it instead of the topic itself, yet every time I’ve seen this one reposted everyone is on topic for the most part and no one cares about Micro Mike. Just goes to show how much of an irrelevant gay he is and how AVGN was his only real success in life.
AVGN made him a multimillionaire, he plays video games all day, has a a ten inch willy, and a QT girlfriend. He'll be fine.
>AVGN made him a multimillionaire
How did he make that much money by AVGN? What did he do?
He wrote most of the episodes and did the title cards. They split the profit. James had a frickload too but blew most of it on the movie.
Yeah I'm aware of that but I had no idea AVGN made that much money where they're multi millionaires
Wrote, collabed and was directly responsible for avgn in the first place.
>AVGN made him a multimillionaire
All of which he has spent on video games and McDonald’s
>he plays video games all day
and looks like shit as a result
>has a ten inch willy
that he got from someone else on a gay forum
>and a QT girlfriend
lol
Nothing more pathetic than people trying to redefine game completion because it's the only achievement they can pretend they have in their life
>only achievement they can pretend they have
using save states you beat a game is literally a pretend achievement lmfao
>Ganker is as casual as games journalists
lol, lmao even.
Ganker showed its true colors today
I don't care about approval of some homosexuals on twitter or Ganker, I care about my own enjoyment. Finished Super Metroid yesterday and it was a sluggish jankfest even with save states, trying to play it without would just make my experience worse
Pathetically casual.
>Finished Super Metroid yesterday with save states
you didnt finish super metroid, it finished you
actually yeah, it finished my desire to play this garbage ever again. From now on I would treat anyone who unironically praises SM as "the greatest metroidvania" as a senile boomer
The bosses in super Metroid aren't even hard, I could understand someone being stuck for missing the fake wall, but the bosses?
I didn't use the save states for the bosses (for the most part, I did die on the pterodact... uhm, SPACE PIRATE RIDLEY like 5 times, but there's a save nearby regardless), I used them for when I got stuck and went to the opposite side of the map only to discover I still can't progress there. So instead of wasting time running all the way back I just load the save
>super metroid was too hard for you
>reading comprehension
no, it's not hard, just a slog to play
>Muh stolen video game valor
People who use save states are nerds, and I hate nerds.
>you didn't really beat it unless you beat it in one sitting
you homosexuals are beyond pathetic
>now have the power to rewind whenever anything bad happens to me in a game
>people point out this isn't the same as beating it normally
Has nothing to do with beating it in one sitting or not.
Reminder he doesn't actually have a 12 inch wiener so everything he says should be taken with a grain of salt.
Depends on what you used it for. If you just add extra checkpoints to save time it's fine, but if you save after every single hit you make on a boss that feels more scummy to me.
I beat DKC 1-3 using save states but i couldnt save state in DKC returns
I don't really care if Mike Matel thinks I beat the game or not. I finished the game and went on with my life.
That's all good, but for people that want to discuss the game together it makes sense to have a common definition. Beating a game generally is taken to mean you beat it without external modification or cheat codes. Nothing wrong with changing the game, but when talking about the game's design or difficulty, or your general experience with the game, you're not coming from the same place. Since by playing with save state abuse or rewinding, you didn't play through the game as it was originally designed.
Nothing wrong with it, play how you have fun. It only bothers me when people deny that it's a different experience and challenge.
Sounds like you need to shut up
I play games not beat, you know to enjoy them.
>2019
why you gays love being angry?
Love yourself wojak spamming Ganker regular.
If you used the rewind feature, you didn't beat the game
I wonder if he was rewatching some of Disneycember, watched Doug Walker do that over and over again, and lost it.
Completely agree.
People who have let electronics destroy their attention span do not have the ability to retry an old game until they win.
Savescummers will never experience the coomlike feeling of beating a game that you've been stuck on for months without cheating.
why do you care? I wonder if you morons play on the original hardware plugged in to CRT. Otherwise you wouldn't be getting the original and intended experience either.
>why do you care?
We generally don't, it doesn't matter all that often.
>I wonder if you morons play on the original hardware plugged in to CRT. Otherwise you wouldn't be getting the original and intended experience either.
There's a big difference between adding extra input lag playing on a worse display, and giving yourself infinite attempts in a game designed to limit your attempts.
Yes.
Give me (You)'s if you agree:
OP is a wienersucking moron and he should go back.
Rewind sucks and helps too much but I will always use save states to skip useless backtracking and running around
Video games should be played as it was originally meant, that is, in one sitting, no saves, no continues.
Like you would in an arcade.
I don't see what's wrong with continues, if they're in the game, that's because the developers made the game with continues in mind, so using them isn't straying away from the intended experience.
By that logic savescumming is just fine because it lets failures go unpunished.
I'd say save scumming is different because it's not part of the original intended experience, it's something added by features like emulators or re-releases in modern machines, that you couldn't do back then, however if when you lose all of your lives the game gives you a "Continue?" option, even back then, then using it is simply using the resources that are given to you and following the games' rules, you're not cheating or anything like that, so it's legit.
>I'd say save scumming is different because it's not part of the original intended experience
it was a hardware limitation only. saving required additional cost to the publisher so they didn't do it, and the vast majority of games used "codes" to jump to where you were anyway as save game replacement.
the moment it became physically feasible to implement saving the game; developers did.
arcade games that required coins to play are the only games where "beating them" matters; because "beating them" actually meant something, not getting israeliteed by the arcade. Instead of loosing and paying $0.25/min you could play for 30 mins.
You're right
arcade games were made hard on purpose so you waste more money on it
I used save states for the Mega Man 2 Wily fight because that was some nonsense, I didn’t have any items because I wasn’t good at the stages, so I had to refight the whole boss rush again and again just to get a shot.
there are more than 5000 NES/SNES/SEGA games
experiencing them all is impossible. fast forward / rewind is the only logical solution, and for the most part the gameplay on all these games is shit and the same.
if you've even taken the time to open and play 5000 games for 10 seconds it's an accomplishment. there is nothing wrong with using these features unless you want to fail to experience history.
imagine spending a month to play 1 game and then dying and not experiencing the remaining 4999 games. some of those stories might have affected your life so you didn't become a loser playing video games until death
I play to have fun. If I have fun using cheats then so be it.
Of course I beat the game.
Look, the end credits are rolling. They only roll those when you beat the game
>watches credits on YouTube
I beat the game.
Didn't the very first megaman have no save system whatsoever
If you want to beat it you had to do it in one sitting
It's also 40 minutes long at most, you underaged zoom zoom.
i save state for RNG moments like drop tables, chest loot, or gambling minigames
and theres nothing you can do about it
>twitter screencap thread with a 4 year old rotted jpeg
what the frick did you mean by this
>mike matei
literally
>video game thread defending being a talentless cheater homosexual at video games
That's how you know this place is garbage, just in case the endless gay ERP threads hadn't clued you in yet.
I usually don't care what c**ts on twitter are saying, but in this case, he's fricking right
I used save states in earthbound and Mother 3 because dying means having to do a dungeon all over again so it's too time consuming. All the enemies die in 1 hit anyway so I just save time
I can't tell if that's a typo in your post or if you're just an ESL moron, but if he used rewinding to undo his mistakes, then he did not legit beat Akuma.
I know, tell the mongs that claim the rewinding option is not cheating.
that post is perfectly understandable, moron-kun
He responded to my post as though he was refuting my point whilst perfectly agreeing with me. He's the fricking moron.
I watched until the end. I don't care how he played this game that I'm not playing. Maybe you shouldn't either.
What's with all the "why do you care?" replies?
Whether it's important to care about has nothing to do with whether it's accurate or not.
I'd rather use the rewind feature than not have fun and progress.
That's reasonable.
It's fine to play that way if you like, but you won't get better at the game and might cheat yourself out of a richer experience.
I don't use Switch
Cool. Pc emulators have rewind too
And save game is PC games feature
If the game originally had a "save anywhere" feature, then saving mid level is not save scumming.
Unless you abuse the frick out of it and hammer quicksave every few minutes of course.
SNES games never had a save feature until the new ports, so yeah, I'd count using the rewind as cheating.
When I started emulating I used to savescum like a little b***h. In harder games I'd be pressing the savestate button after every second. I stopped recently simply because while I was getting to the end and seeing what the game had to offer I realized I was committing very little of the game to memory. For example I couldn't even recognize a single song from a game I had just finished playing because between saving and loading the song was constantly being interrupted.
I've made peace with the fact that some older games I just won't naturally reach the end because of some arcade style difficulty spike.
>Plays emulations of 20-30-year-old singleplayer console games however he wants
>Makes half of seethe
If you didn't have your parents arguing in the background and a constant threat of your dad storming in, kicking your ass and destroying the cartridge, YOU DIDN'T BEAT THE FREAKIN' GAME *insert clap emoji between every word*
KEK Who cares, tiny issues for zoomers are world problems, holy shit.
Why does this simple statement make people seethe so much?
>activates godmode and beats the game
>how is it any different that you picking up more health
A lot of NES games have very shitty design and deserve to have rewinds and save states abused on them. Any game with limited or no continues automatically justifies using them.
That said, if you use them on SNES games (excluding some of the early ones with limited continues), you're a casual homosexual.
>Any game with limited or no continues automatically justifies using them
At most it justifies using it either at the beginning of a stage for infinite continues, or at a checkpoint for infinite lives. Anything more is homosexualry
>Any game with limited or no continues automatically justifies using them.
They're designed around letting the player make a set amount of mistakes, and going over that means you have to try again. You're going beyond the developer's intended design by adding continues, especially if a game actually has mechanics to give players more live for doing things like finding secret. Yes I use mistakes because there are very few times even in many of the bullshit classic games where you are not responsible for your own deaths.
Limited continues are okay and often part of the challenge. For example, I'm playing Contra Hard Corps on Mega Drive right now and while you die after 1 hit, the game gives you 3 lives and 5 continues which is definitely more than fair. It's still pretty challenging especially solo.
>run into even just ONE particularly challenging section
>lose all your lives/continues and have to restart the entire game
No, it's AIDS and only there to artificially pad out game length, probably to steal more rental money. Even the hardest retro throwback games being made today aren't using limited continues.
>run out of resource
>have to replay a section of the game
What's the issue? Other than you refusing to git gud.
I only "git gud" at games that are well-designed. i.e. not ones with limited continues
>if i can't immediately win, it's bad design
ngmi
I'm okay with limited continues/extra lives aslong as the challenge is fair. What's really AIDS are games that have no continues or extra lives at all. I don't feel bad about savescumming the frick out of them.
You're simply saving time.
You die at that jump. You have death screen and death animation jingles. Game starts back up. You have to wait. Then you go back to checkpoint, you run all the way back to that jump and try again.
Or you could just rewind back to the jump. Saving yourself minutes.
Ain't nobody got time for that shit anymore dude.
This is why literally every classic rpg rerelease has a up to 12x fast forward feature. Wasting people's time like back in the day is not something anyone wants to put up with today.
>You die at that jump. You have death screen and death animation jingles. Game starts back up. You have to wait.
Most emulators have a fast-forward function, moron.
It depends on the game and how/where you quicksave. Saving before the boss so you don't have to go through the same level a hundred times is fine, but quicksaving during boss fights is cheating. It's also okay to quicksave at the start of a level if said game has no extra lifes or continues. Things like that add nothing to challenge other than burning you out and making you drop a game sooner due to boredom and frustration.
Your game isn't hard to begin with, just boring. There is no merit in beating it you just spent more time wanking yourself
I'd honestly couldn't picture a bigger homosexual than someone bragging that he actually did beat a game, not even someone sucking the literal dick of many strangers on a pride parade would top that
I always use invincible cheats and save states. No need for rewind honestly.
who cares if you beat a game. did u enjoy it tho
>seething twitter autists screeching
oh no how am I ever going to recover? I can't take this anymore bros I have to change my life and my morals now
oh wait I almost forgot that I'm not an american corporation.
So how big is his wiener really?
Did you use it in the middle of a section or a fight? That's cheating and ruining the game
Did you use it after failing a boss fight so you don't have to walk back to the boss? That's just fixing the game by adding proper checkpoints
If I finish a game without picking up every collectible, did I beat the game?
If I finish a game without dying once, did I beat the game?
If I finish a game without letting every possible object stand in every possible spot and seeing every possible animation from every possible angle, did I beat the game?
don't care L+ ratio + nice hairline homosexual
The games back then had artificial difficulty because companies didn't want people renting them from Blockbuster and returning them a few days later. So the result is most people didn't beat video games back then. So if you saw the ending using save states, you got to see something 99% of people back then didn't.
>intended intended intended intended intended intended blah blah intended
People's intensions are sometimes moronic. I'm fixing them and beating the game in a better way :^)
aren't saves basically just a rewind feature in their own right?