>SHSH: it's too hard to bring all pokemon from 3DS because of importing tools, engine, textures, blah blah blah and other lies!

>SHSH: it's too hard to bring all pokemon from 3DS because of importing tools, engine, textures, blah blah blah and other lies!
>SV: dude lmfao we removed even more pokemon even those who were in SWSH XDDD
reminder the dex cut is a scam and every argument defending it is a blatant lie.
if Gamefreak was telling the truth about the "difficulty" of importing Pokémon from 3DS to Switch, then why did they remove Pokémon that existed in SWSH?

Ape Out Shirt $21.68

Black Rifle Cuck Company, Conservative Humor Shirt $21.68

Ape Out Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I think they simply can't produce new models in time, now they changed textures again

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Basically this. At least this time most models are new or at least retouched (proper eyeballs and mouth) and it's been said that there are more animations in general. I wonder if we'll get at some point a game with all mons once they have all models, at least just for use it as a selling point.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        But what is the point of constantly "improving" the models if the rest of the game still looks horrible? It does nothing having a gorgeous model when it constantly stutters at 5FPs trying to climb some stairs. GF has its priorities completely reversed. Let's Go looked great, why couldn't they just stick with that art direction and polish it? Ugh.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Because, and say it with me, YOU'LL BUY IT ANYWAY

          And if you don't, 20m others will.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Creatures Inc. have to justify their paychecks every month

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >now they changed textures again
      which no one asked for, meanwhile the animations are still as dogshit as ever
      So no real issue was addressed here yet morons still lap up everything GF shits without asking a single question

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        it dose bring up a concerning turned of just updating the skins a bit to excuse yourself of having to make all mons obviable or like 90% of them.

        animations are more work to update than a texture is. i noticed newer mons have more thoughtful animations and personality where others have generic movements.

        I would like more animations than detailed fur/skin or glow effects. that stuff can be updated later live.

        I would be ok with them taking a new pokemon break to get all their pokemn models together and prepped to be put into one game like Pokemon GO is actually doing.

        So TPC can put them all in they just do not want to put the resources into it. this is due to them constantly pushing a new game one after the other. and making and updating models so that only a smaller roster can be updated in time for release.

        >I just want a full roster to be a main selling point along with getting new mons.

        done ranting

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          They have the perfect excuse with overworld only models now, "where can we put them?"
          The game was designed around the existing mons populating, now they HAVE to add new paid areas if you want old mons roaming around

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            why the frick they don't use the same model?
            Both are shit anyways

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Because it would be the same bizarre disconnect as Battle Revolution that even normies would notice.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Actually we finally see good animations. Problem is the BATTLE animations (not pokemon themselves) are huge letdown after arceus

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          They dont even need to make complex animations.
          Just drag the model like they do for the move “play rough” with physical moves.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            We all know that but why they dont do that? This is a question.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        They mentioned in the initial dexcut announcement that they wouldn't be adding all pokemon to the games anymore in the future.
        >remove Pokémon that existed in SWSH
        I foresaw this happening then and it still makes 0 sense to me

        >which no one asked for
        this

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >>now they changed textures again
        speak for yourself you turbozooomer, I bet you actually liked the models not changing in game for a fricking decade

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Sprites were iconic and even those changed but remained sprites until Gen 5. Those were peak soul and needed no change yet here we are

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      free updates to provide older game's pokemon rosters is to be expected in my inital purchase.

      guess you could say the scale of pokemon is so big they cant keep it up without massive costs, thus the charge to move and store the data or millions of users from 20 years of service.

      I still think they should take the hit or work it into the budget costs for the games. sucks when other games let you more and store data with not extra fees or charges.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >in time
      That's the biggest problem. To make a worthwhile game of the scope that fans are expecting would require much more time to put the game together. GameFreak instead chooses to rush a new mainline title out every other year.
      Honestly, frick that. I'd be happy to wait 3-4 years if it means I can bring all my favorites to the newest game.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        ah but goyim they have to make that early winter release date or else profits will go down and no one wants that

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >~1000 Middle quality models every few years?
      We can't possibly do that.
      Where do these years go, with SWSH there was at least level design happening. I believe an AI could have made the entire SV map, barring the central castle town.

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    but realistically, they are shit at programming and probably had to do the work from scratch

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Nah, they just love to spite people.
      notice how they take every criticism and makes it worse
      >oh, you are complaining about graphics? we will make them worse lol
      >oh, you are complaining abotu Charizard pandering? we will makes it worse lol
      >oh, you are complaining about dex cut? we will cut even more pokemon lol
      >oh, you are complaining about Bank? we will make it even more scammy lol
      >oh, you like Greninja that much? we will nerf it and remove its special form lol

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        And millions will still buy it anyways sadly, what are we supposed to do?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Nothing. the npc bots will keep supporting Scamfreak and I will skip this shit games and play something better

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            At least we will forever have older games and romhacks

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Frick it, let's make our own open source version with all the features and pokemon we want.

          If it gets enough traction and success, maybe Gamefreak will start copying.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            BDSP anon

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              What about it ?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                It's super easy to mod and people are already making a mod for it that includes the National Dex
                It's been making great progress and in a few years it could easily surpass Gen 3 in the modding scene

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Oh sweet, i didn't know about it, gonna check it out.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Anyone still buying/playing these games deserves it.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Nah, they just love to spite people.
      notice how they take every criticism and makes it worse
      >oh, you are complaining about graphics? we will make them worse lol
      >oh, you are complaining abotu Charizard pandering? we will makes it worse lol
      >oh, you are complaining about dex cut? we will cut even more pokemon lol
      >oh, you are complaining about Bank? we will make it even more scammy lol
      >oh, you like Greninja that much? we will nerf it and remove its special form lol

      not to mention how they keep removing more features like switch-set and EXP share toggle to make the game easier than ever despite the complaints that games are becoming dead easy

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      They are shit but have the means to outsource.

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    like why cant we port all Pokémon models to the current games?

    i understand not on release due to the new gen and new models need screen time. but after 6 months i want all the Pokémon bar some legendries, to be in the game and playable/ some what obtainable.

    I feel this is a major pillar for why people keep coming back to these games.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Because Gamefreak turns controversy and shame talking into free marketing.
      the thousands memes shitting on SWSH for cutting pokemon gave them more exposure than influencers

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Because that means the older pokemon now need animations for picnic and overworld too. Plus the model detail that SV finally added (with PLA too).
      Their lie from SwSh is actually true this time, but it still doesn't meant that can't add everything in the next year

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    SV models look updated though and makes the initial dex cut reason finally make sense with cool textures and more details.
    Too bad everything surrounding the pokemon look like shit.

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Make a shit game every 2 years or a good game every 4-5 years, what a dilema GF have...

    All they had to do was:
    >make a fricking good game
    >cut as many pokédex entry they want at release
    >each generation lasting at least 4-5 years
    >paid expansions/DLC that improve lore and more pokémon
    >free compability pack for those who still have only Core games
    >hire more people or stop working on half a dozen shit game at same time

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    There's zero fricking excuse for the dex now
    Hopefully some based autists start porting mons into SV.
    Unlike SWSH, this game is actually tolerable enough to replay with a full dex

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Suck it ivychud. No one cares about your boring plant toad. GF has made that very clear. They even added Braixen to salt your wounds

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Ivysaur is the dexcut posterboy this time? What happened to Stantler?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        It's just shills choosing a complainer's fav pokemon to shitpost on

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Stantler got an evo and is in the game again

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Next gen dexcut deserves a next gen shitmon. Maybe Volbeat/Illumise, but i'd go with Blitzle
        >Gen 6: only available through late/post-game rng mechanics (friend safari, mirage spots)
        >Gen 7: transfer
        >Gen 8: dexcut
        >Gen 9: dexcut 2

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Their autism to keep regional dexes "somewhat coherent" is fine as an excuse and understandable up to a certain point but there's no fricking excuse to not code all the other pokemons, keep it as USUM did with no Dex entries (put them in HOME).
    >b-but what about regionals? If you hatched one and wanted a specific regional how could you do it?
    Add a new gimmick key item, how about a "Wavelength Stone" or some shit? When you enable this item it emitts waves that simulates (insert chosen region here) while active. Perhaps GF is capable of a more elegant solution, who knows. Point is they are lazy and their marketing strategies chasing their 3 year cycles are bullshit

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    If a game option like Shift or a pokemon is removed then it's just simply not wholesome or SJW-approved for our dear LGBT friends

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      female bodybuilders have been in pokemon since 2003

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >one time in a non-canon spin-off game
        bravo, Sherlock!

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    They don't even have a bottle tower equivalent this time.

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    With all the time they wasted animating 5,000,000 different terraforms, we easily could have had the national dex back. They're morons who need to get their priorities straight

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      There are 18

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        18 x 400 or whatever the dex is, anon. Those are all unique animations and models

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Anon the hats are clearly separate models they slap on top of a pokemon.
          I'd hope they'd have the brains to have some programed crystalisation plugin that automatically makes the mons crystal, but knowing that the dynamax pokemon were all separate models instead of just using a size increase plugin, and seeing shit like all the various fricking riding overworld forms of the SV box legendaries have individual form entries for battle with duplicate stats and abilities even though they can't be used in battle, I'd believe gamefreak are stupid enough to make one crystal model for every pokemon, at miniumum doubling the amount of models in the game.

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >we removed even more pokemon
    Well shit. Is there a list for the removed monsters? Getting real sick of Gamefreak's bullshit.

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Yes gamefreak lied about dex cuts. But it was a noble lie and was necessary at the time to smooth over the situation. PLA and SV has shown is that dex cut was an excellent decision that has allowed them to pump up the quality of their games. And I think for that, we can forgive them.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      you sound like a paradox human from the future, is your skin chrome too?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >PLA and SV has shown is that dex cut was an excellent decision that has allowed them to pump up the quality of their games.
      No
      PLA was definite proof that the dex cut was a bad thing. You make a game that is ALL about catching mons and then you have a dex smaller than GSC released 20 years before it. No wonder that the entire playerbase spent most of their playthroughts catching the exact same pokemon 10 times
      Also, SV has zero quality. This game is what SWSH should have been, too bad it came 3 years too fricking late. We're already near the end of the switch era and this shit is the best that they could come with? The best thing that I can say about SV is that it's not a tech demo unlike PLA

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Worse thing is, Nintendo already said in a shareholders meeting that Switch's successor will be backwards compatible with Switch. So we can't expect GF to put more effort if they can keep working with Switch 1 as their target (imagine them as they worked on older gens) in order to have a broader install base. This will probably be the limit of their capacities until Switch 3 arrives in the future

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      shut the frick up Black person. PLA IS SHIT, SV WILL BE SHIT, THE NEW POKEMON ARE SHIT. fricking israelitehomosexual

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      eat shit, israelite Merrick

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      How many bugs did he shove up your ass this time joe?

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    There probably is a legitimate reason but it's compounded by the fact that they're pretty fricking incompetent. I would actually be okay with them doing the Dex cut 100% of the time if they actually delivered on the excuse that they were going to improve animations and modeling. The textures definitely look better on these models, but it's just bizarre that not even all the pokémon from Legends came over and a lot of those had very similar changes. They need to seriously look at hiring out even more hands for generation 10 and I hope that is the direction they go because even though these games are going to sell like gangbusters I think it's getting harder and harder to excuse the graphical fidelity and performance as everything else around them becomes just plain old better.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Gen 10 is only Switch 2 we have to redo the models again please understand and look forward to Gen 11 instead

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I'd stomach it if they switched to the PLA model, one release with real single player that isn't riddled in event exclusive bullshit so the game is worth replaying down the line.

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Simple, Switch is weaker than 3DS

  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I guess some models have been improved even beyond SwSh, but people wouldn't really mind some models being slightly worse (even though they aren't noticeable)

  17. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    No. One. Cares. I don't know why you people insist on dying on this hill, no one else fricking cares. Nobody plays post game, they just don't. People don't fricking care if they cut post game content. The regional dex is all that has ever mattered, they were doing the nat dex for like 2% of the playerbase, so they decided to stop. No one cares.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >The regional dex is all that has ever mattered
      and when Gen5 did it it sold like shit because Pokepedos didn't see caterpie and pidgey in route 1.
      there's a reason why Pidgey is coded to be the very first encounter in X/Y.

      pokemon fanbase is just full of clowns who wants "to relive the nostalgia" like braindead manchildren

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        This post makes me thing you don't know what a regional dex is. Hint, it's not just the new mons. It was only just the new mons in BW.

  18. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I'm surprised the Nips haven't Kyoani'd them yet

    Out of all game studios they're the ones who mostly deserve it

  19. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    new pokemon designs sell merch, and they realise that doing 100 designs every year or so is gonna be ass to do in like 2/3 console gens
    by making up the excuse back during swsh they managed to stop the vast majority of people from complaining

    imagine if they still offered natdex now. then you Black folk would complain "well 1000 is possible, so why not 1500? why not 2000?"

    and the longer they waited with dexcut the more people would complain about that, until their workload legit IS that bad but there's no going back anymore because, well, it was possible back then, so why not now???

    i know how you homosexuals think. it'd be endless goalpost moving so they decided at the least possible controversial time, frick it lets stop that shit

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >doing 100 designs every year or so
      They had already stopped doing that before Dexit. Gen 6 only added 72 new Pokemon. Gen 7 only added 81.

  20. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    being jap and being part of nintendo shields them from any legitimate criticism and internet cancellation

  21. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    52066490
    >PLA and SV has shown is that dex cut was an excellent decision that has allowed them to pump up the quality of their games.

  22. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    There was no excuse with Sword and Shield but to cut Gamefreak some slack, the models do look significantly better in SV. The new models do a good chunk of of Pokémon a lot of favors too.

  23. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    All the extra textures make the new models look like shit in sv

  24. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Why am I supposed to care about the dexcut?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      if you don't care about the pokemon why are you playing pokemon?
      >i'm here to coom at little girls and furries xD
      you are worthless oxygen waster so nobody should care about you either

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Other mon-collecting games don't have every single mon they've ever created in every single game

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          other games didn't raise a 25 years worth of memories + other games are not multi-billion franchises

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >other games didn't raise 25 years worth of memories
            pretty sure SMT is literally older than pokemon
            >other games are not multi-billion franchises
            don't see how that's relevant. quantity =/= quality. Would PLA be a better game if you could catch all 900+ pokemon in it?

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >pretty sure SMT is literally older than pokemon
              it wasn't about catching all monsters
              >Would PLA be a better game if you could catch all 900+ pokemon in it?
              of course duh.
              anyone who doesn't see their favorites in this game gonna skip it

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >It wasn't about catching all monsters
                "Gotta Catch Em All" was only a tagline created for the english version, it wasn't in the original Japanese.
                >of course duh
                why?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >"Gotta Catch Em All" was only a tagline created for the english version
                which became extremely popular it was used worldwide for marketing.
                >why
                because people love to use the pokemon they like in the next-gen game with all the new features and content.

                removing pokemon to force people to use the pokemon the company wants them to use will never be a good practice

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >it was used worldwide for marketing
                in Japan too?
                >because people love to use the pokemon they like in the next-gen game with all the new features and content
                PLA didn't have a lot of my favorites but I still enjoyed the game a lot. If you think that 1 pokemon = 1 quality then you don't know anything about game design, its people like you who cause CHARIZAAAAAARD FROM KANTOOOOOOOO to get shilled every other gen

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >then you don't know anything about game design
                post your Game Dev degree, Joe

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                can confirm that I’m skipping the game because of the fact that 80+% of my fully trained pokemon aren’t in SV. I don’t care about new pokemon anymore, the fun was them being added to an already existing roster. It kind of doesn’t mean shit now that more and more are removed every game.

                If anything I’d rather them never make new pokemon again if we can just keep what we have. It’s why I stick to Ultra Moon over any of the switch games

                >other games didn't raise 25 years worth of memories
                pretty sure SMT is literally older than pokemon
                >other games are not multi-billion franchises
                don't see how that's relevant. quantity =/= quality. Would PLA be a better game if you could catch all 900+ pokemon in it?

                Why are you defending this so hard? You’re acting like it would be a nigh-impossible thing to do

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      because it's a symptom of constant declining quality that we've been slurping up for 20 years

  25. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    They just don't want to hit copy and paste 1000 times. They're that lazy.

  26. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    didn't care about le dexcuterrino back then, and don't care now
    and you can't convince me to care because it doesnt matter

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      based goy just consoom like an NPC bot and be happy about it xD

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        based goyslopper just follow trends and get outraged on twitter with the rest of the herd xD

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          but the trends say that complainers are nazis and Gamefreak are better than my parents and religion xD

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            why did you screencap your own posts LOL

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >LOL
              kys, TAHK0
              you will never be a paid shill like israelite Merrick

  27. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *