>some of the most critically and commercially acclaimed games of all time
>all have dogshit gameplay
what is this phenomenon called Ganker?
CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
>some of the most critically and commercially acclaimed games of all time
>all have dogshit gameplay
what is this phenomenon called Ganker?
CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
Contrarianism to substitute having a personality
This whole post is either bait or posted by an actual moron
The only one that had bad gameplay was W3. People that play it are generally storygays so going from cutscene to cutscene is the focus . The Other two are more exploration type games. RDR2 walked the tightrope between gameplay and stories exceedingly well. Of the three only one had bad gameplay
I've never found rockstar auto aim gunplay engaging
W3 was fun idk what you're on about but I like that you were brave enough to share your shitty opinion
Being a storygay is a perfectly valid option. You are in charge of you.
they are all about exploration , questing and story telling since games are more mainstream and casual friend now
although I don't blame you ,you're probably into more combat focused games
one of them's decent and the other two are cheap imitations of it
Skyrim is fricking shit
still objectively best open world game ever made, cope and seethe
I don't get the hatred for TW3's combat.
I like TW3 well enough but the combat is incredibly mediocre
Not by any stretch of the imagination as bad as Skyrim but it wouldn't be good enough for a game that is a quarter as long as TW3 is.
>it wouldn't be good enough for a game that is a quarter as long as TW3 is.
If you're saying shit like this, you haven't played enough RPGs to have an opinion worth listening to.
Jeez if you only knew. I can like stereotypical WRPGs with shit combat but it's always out of a spirit of tolerance. You're not gonna get me saying Gothic has killer combat that really carries the game. I might say it's adequate. Witcher 3 combat is mostly adequate except the game is so fricking long it will be driving your crazy in the last third or quarter.
Skyrim's combat is shit.
RDR 2's combat is fine. I even have a mod that slows down the reload animations.
Witcher combat has some problems, like hilariously bad hitboxes at times or a skill tree that doesn't change how you play the game at all, but it's decent overall. It's no Sekiro but it feels nice. Especially for a western action RPG, which tend to play like Risen.
Witcher 3 plays just fine
The other two I agree
Because game design is usually a give and take you have to accept. No game can truly have everything be perfect. A game with great gameplay could have a shitass game world, graphics, and story. A game with great story can have awful gameplay and be terribly linear, etc.
I don't think bad taste is a phenomenon that needs its own name.
Contrarianism and low IQ.
It's called being filtered, git gud nerd.
Sorry no, it's not that
Skyrim did not have bad gameplay. The other two definitely did though.
Yes, Skyrim has bad gameplay. The combat is unresponsive, floaty, barebones, and horribly animated. I'd take a dozen combat encounters in either of the other games over one in Skyrim.
Define gameplay.
Okay pal, I'll revise my post to just "bad combat," okay? So we'll address whatever else you think makes that game good separately.
You will just go into your grab bag of buzzwords.
If you can't define gameplay how can you have an opinion on it?
Surprised he didn't thrown in jank. Probably saving that one.
Seems like you're more interested in your expectations of me than discussing the quality of TESV. What kind of answer are you looking for? A list of other gameplay elements in the game such as progression, crafting, gathering? The sum of these parts? I played the game. Let's talk about the game
A definition of gameplay would be a start so we are on the same page.
The only games with good combat are the games that focus exclusively on combat, you're not gonna get that from RPG hybrids
>skyrim
>dogshit gameplay
its barebones at worse I wouldn't call it dogshit. Dogshit gameplay is something like Yakuza Dead Souls or Left Alive
It's called paid reviews and normies having shit taste.
It's called judging the entire package together instead of one subjective aspect of it.
>what is this phenomenon called Ganker?
They are called normies, or NPCs. They don't care about gameplay, only want something "realistic" to look at.
Nioh/Nioh 2 have considerably better and more in depth and complex gameplay than any Souls game yet people regularly dismiss it or barely talk about it even on Ganker because every other aspect than the gameplay is mediocre.