Someone explain why

I really don't understand the gall it takes to think you know better than the original devs and change things up.
Who the frick do these people think they are? Maybe games aren't considered real works of art but you will never see people re-writing books, re-painting art pieces, and editing out parts of movies and expect people would receive that well.. so why do it to games? And I don't mean just re-release the game as it is but "just prettier" I mean there's plenty of things to add I'm sure from content that never got to be added. Or maybe you have new ideas or areas, but changing it entirely from the source material and the amount of unnecessary things is just starts to add up and look insulting. They could have at the very least had an option like Halo MCC did to switch it back to the old look....

Ape Out Shirt $21.68

DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68

Ape Out Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Women hate pretty women but all want to be pretty if they arent. Theyd change into a pretty woman instantly if possible. Same for the simps that have no balls, no backbone, and just do whatever said women want for a chance to tap some pussy. Western pubs and devs are on a crusade to make every female character ugly because they're all made up of said women and simps.

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    B-b-but they had to m-m-motion capture t-t-they couldn't do that with the old c-c-cast

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I know this is a b8 bread but imma say I actually don't like how they added cutscenes. I also dislike how Isaac talks. Yeah he does in the other games but that's what made the original so good. No cutscenes no talking. Everything story was through logs and rig videos. Just seems like EA doesn't understand what actually makes the first one great

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Also wtf is up with the lighting/atmosphere. The med bay looks like a fricking medieval dungeon not a hospital. The ship looked so much more utilitarian in the first game. Now it looks like they made it spoopy for the hell of it.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >No cutscenes no talking.
      no talking is whatever but the original definitely had cutscenes. what do you think was happening when Isaac was immobilized from interacting with a scene?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Im saying it breaks immersion is all. I wouldn't be able to look around or do jack pussy if a big ass tentacle grabbed and slammed me. Losing control of your character doesn't equate to a cutscene. Take the scene when Isaac encountered the sea ray breeder c**t. In the original you're free to move around as you watch in horror as it does it's thing to the body. In the new game it's just a cutscene, Isaac struggling with it where you have no control. The first game is so legendary because they gave you control nearly the entire time is all I'm saying

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >THIS SUCKS MERCER JUST STASIS'D ME AND I CAN'T MOVE WHILE HE'S TALKING WHAT THE FRICK 0/10 SHITTY GAME
          you're nitpicking over nothing. the only time this game takes control away from you is when Isaac is otherwise immobilized for one reason or another. and there have been a whopping... two scenes where that happens.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            The whole point of the original was to have control over the character and have him silent. It's called immersion. That's fine if you like movie games Black person, I do not.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            diff anon but i kinda hated not being able to jump from the valor as it blows up and instead it was a cutscene of him being thrown against a wall and then flipping out the airlock - felt less cool since i didn't do it

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Damn they cutscened that too? I already mentioned in this bred they cutscened the first encounter with the breeder but I didn't know they fricked that part too. Frick this shitty low effort cash grab

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      isaac talking really ruins the horror/psychosis vibe. you feel less as the player when isaac's voice inserts his own (poorly executed) feelings into scenes. isaac's silence left space for the player to insert into or reflect on the situation and that experience just isn't there in the remake.

      did they add his VO just because the other games had it? did audiences prefer VO over not? for me, it undermined the game's atmosphere pretty thoroughly

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Finally someone who understands why the original was good.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        This is the same reason why Alien stopped being good after the first film. Less can sometimes mean more.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >did they add his VO just because the other games had it? did audiences prefer VO over not? for me, it undermined the game's atmosphere pretty thoroughly
        nobody liked VO but they don't make these games for people

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      WTF Issac talks?

      How do these people not realize the weight of decisions like that? The protag talking or not talking hugely changes how the player interacts with them.

      Same with adding cutscenes. The best part of dead space was how everything occurred live in-game. Convos, menus, things that *would* have been cutscenes or pause the game in any other title.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Isaac already talked and was seen in DS2.

      • 1 year ago
        Ifyouseethisyoucanunderstand

        In fact, Gunner has been with us since the first game.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >do these people not realize the weight of decisions like that?
        of course they realized. most audiences need everything explained to them, particularly the audiences most loose with their wallets. they wanted to maximize the demographics the game would sell to and they made this decision accordingly.

        just look at all the glowing reviews of the remake. journos are so ecstatic to have everything explained to them because they don't have an active reasoning center in their brains. that's the consoomer they want to target

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Based bro this bread is a warzone. Stand your ground fren, these EA shills are abundant and their moronation is terrifying. Unlike the remake kek. But yeah, there's cutscenes and isaac talks.

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Demake

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I agree but you and I are the minority. There are many people who will buy and play trash like Demons Souls remake and not think there's anything wrong with it. The unfortunate conclusion I come to is that most gamers have no taste and no respect for video games as a medium. They're just toys to them, so more graphics = more good, regardless of who develops it or what changes are made.

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Anybody who thinks she's looks like a "granny" seriously needs to leave their basement and go look at a real woman.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      well it's a combination of the actress from DS2 being ten years older and the fact that face scanning always bloats the actor's face.that's why artists still need to go back and sculpt the scanned model.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      cope gilf lover

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      my 60 year old mother (who is also a grandmother) looks younger

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I'm married, have been for 10 years, and my 36 old wife who's also the mother of my son doesn't look near that old, she's got no wrinkles at all.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It's not only the fact that she's old, she also has an ugly expression on her face compared to the sweet expression on the og girlfriend. There was no reason to change this except for a hatred of beauty.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >she also has an ugly expression on her
        she's in the middle of a cosmic horror where literally everyone has been brutally dismembered and their bodies desecrated. why the frick would she be sweetly smiling?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      YWNBAW

  7. 1 year ago
    Ifyouseethisyoucanunderstand

    For context, the actor in dead space 1 and extraction is voiced by Iyari Limon, her face is likely modeled after her, In 2 onwards, she's voiced by Tanya Clarke, Who reprised her role for the remake.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Again though Isaac should look like Isaac in my opinion, not his voice actor. Same goes for the rest of the cast, at the very least they should've let you switch it to look like the original more.

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Is supposed to be in her mid 40's
    >REEEEEEEEEE, WHY DOESN'T SHE LOOK LIKE A 20-SOMETHING MODEL?!

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      https://deadspace.fandom.com/wiki/Nicole_Brennan
      I dont remember them ever mentioning her age EVER, they suddenly did that for the game too as far as I know.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      https://deadspace.fandom.com/wiki/Nicole_Brennan
      I dont remember them ever mentioning her age EVER, they suddenly did that for the game too as far as I know.

      Nicole is a fricking doctor. that's 8-12 years of schooling. she was at least mid-to-late 30s in the OG.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I suppose youd be right. Still doesn't justify why they wouldn't let you revert the characters to look like they once did in the original. It's a full $60.00 and they couldn't TRY to appease everyone with that? 343 did a better job with MCC as far as that went.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          probably because they rebuilt the game from the ground up and had no access to the original files. and because it's a remake, so who gives a shit. the fact that they went as far as to recreate Isaac's original engineer suit is probably more than they had to do.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah cuz it's impossible to imagine that in the future becoming a doctor takes only 2-3 years...

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      she looks like she's in here late 50s/early 60s

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      They could've just deaged her and Isaac in the remake then, making her a granny makes her death less tragic since she was already an old granny anyway.

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The remake has issues but she looks the same in the remake as she does in 2, just in high definition. If you have an issue with her design blame the original devs for redesigning her between 1 and 2.

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >hot 20-something bimbo is a preeminent medical specialist and master in her field
      makes no sense and her original VO was porn-tier acting. nicole should be mature for the character to make sense

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Found the sperg

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Because good fiction is believable, realism is what amateurs do.

          >my measure of good storytelling is how easily I can fap to the female characters

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Attractive women exist moron

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        If you think her original VO was porn-tier acting, you should hear the new one. Sounds like they picked up the first JOI creator on pornhub and hired them.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Isaac Newton was in his 20s why can't she?
        Also it's fiction.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I honestly, legitimately wonder if the changes to Nicole have some sort of narrative tie to them that'll be further expanded upon in the inevitable DS2 remake and future titles.

      Like new-Isaac possibly having a thing for older women due to internalized mommy issues he had with his fanatical Unitologist mother or something like that. They did completely change the background story surrounding his mother after all, she didn't kill his father in the original - just wasted away all the family's life savings on church donations and whatnot.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Like new-Isaac possibly having a thing for older women
        Are you braindead? Isaac is not young. He's in his 40s at least in these games, he's a similar age to her. Her being weirdly young looking in DS1 (and not DS2) was the anomaly.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >here's that attractive 22 year old Chief Medical Officer I was talking about
          If the original Dead Space was released today they'd be seething over her too.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Even then, new-Nicole still looks fairly older than new-Isaac in this remake. Like, by a substantial amount.

          [...]

          makes a good point. She looked her proper age here, unlike the original DS1 (20's-early 30's) or DS remake (which look like late 40's- early 50's or so.)

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            probably because she's modelled on her voice actress in 2 and Remake, and she's ten years older than she was in 2 now

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/0boicoF.jpg

      I really don't understand the gall it takes to think you know better than the original devs and change things up.
      Who the frick do these people think they are? Maybe games aren't considered real works of art but you will never see people re-writing books, re-painting art pieces, and editing out parts of movies and expect people would receive that well.. so why do it to games? And I don't mean just re-release the game as it is but "just prettier" I mean there's plenty of things to add I'm sure from content that never got to be added. Or maybe you have new ideas or areas, but changing it entirely from the source material and the amount of unnecessary things is just starts to add up and look insulting. They could have at the very least had an option like Halo MCC did to switch it back to the old look....

      Hillary Clinton?

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    You zill look on ze ugly women and you zill be happy

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I dunno why you delicate snowflakes get so deeply triggered by media having normal people in it. she's a deep space medical scientist. ofc she'll be average looking as frick. how many phd dmds have you met that side hustle as a super model?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Because good fiction is believable, realism is what amateurs do.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          yes. reaching chief medical officer at 22 is quite believable isn't it

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Original was made by based chads that looked at dead bodies 24h to make the most disgusting monsters and sounds in a horror game. and had skills

    Demake Devs. People that faint seeing violence and had to put warning labels in the game, They cant even make scary sounds for monsters because they arent creative. They only want to push their Woke shit on people and ruin the game with shitty actors of color. and they have no skill.

    Original will always be the better version.

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It's extremely faithful to the original. Everything added (not changed, just added) makes it fit better with the sequels. The only things changed in any real way are character models and if you decide a game isn't worth it because you can't jack off to a dead chick then the problem isn't the game.

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >you will never see people re-writing books, re-painting art pieces, and editing out parts of movies
    What. People do that all the time.

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    NOOOO DELETE THIS DELETE IT NOW

  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    because none of the people complaining actually played the series

  17. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I think they changed Die Hard or some Bruce Willis movie to remove a sign with the N word. For literature, they reinterpret everything as gay. Shakespeare, Da Vinci, all the masters were gay it turns out.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >I think they changed Die Hard or some Bruce Willis movie to remove a sign with the N word
      That was for a TV edit where all swear words and slurs would be removed, you stupid c**t.

  18. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Weird how none of you supposed big time Dead Space fans furious about the integrity of the original seem to know this already happened over a decade ago in Dead Space 2.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I never played Dead Space 2 so you can take the that nasty dildo out of your sore butthole and stick that argument up there instead

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >I never played Dead Space 2
        So frick off.

    • 1 year ago
      Ifyouseethisyoucanunderstand

      YES.
      THANK YOU.

  19. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Probably because we're basing our opinions and how she looked in the first game? Or are we talking about a different game?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Most of the posts I quoted do not make any sense if they actually knew what she looked like in 2. It's clearly most of them have never played Dead Space and think her looking older was only for this remake and not made for 2, all the way back in 2011. They're just adhering to that.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Fair enough, I'm the gay who first responded to the bread and I do agree her looks are not that important. It's the isaac talking, shit tier atmosphere, and cutscenes that make me pissed.

  20. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >woman who is like 20 is not only supposed to be a doctor, but is the chief medical officer on a big ship
    Ganker would be furious about this today, but suddenly they're mad that she's the accurate age she should be to have such a senior position

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Ganker would be furious about this today, but suddenly they're mad that she's the accurate age she should be to have such a senior position
      that's what gets me. like no shit she looks older than she did in DS2 and the original - Tanya Clarke hasn't played Nicole for ten years.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Tanya Clarke hasn't played Nicole for ten years.
        I don't get this take. it's not a movie being shot to film, it's a video game with 3d models. they can make nicoles 3d model look as old or young as they want. it has nothing to do with the IRL age of the actress

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >I don't get this take. it's not a movie being shot to film, it's a video game with 3d models. they can make nicoles 3d model look as old or young as they want. it has nothing to do with the IRL age of the actress
          I agree but that's not how games are developed. nobody knows how to sculpt likenesses anymore. they just 3D scan an actor and leave it at that. that's why so many characters look bloated (or why that one black woman has bug eyes). they don't bother to fix little defects to get the likeness better, just leave it as is.

          For example, Sheploo wasn't scanned, he was hand-modeled.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >nobody knows how to sculpt likenesses anymore
            citation needed

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              here's your fricking citation

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Holy based

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                based

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Holy based

                Cringe

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Ganker's capacity to sperg out over self-manufactured outrage is unrivaled. they hate everything but the reason why is always second to the emotion

  21. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  22. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    She looks middle 30s there, maybe early 30s.
    The remake legit looks 50+. Which makes sense I guess since her VA is like 55, or at least looks like it.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      No, she looks in her 40s. I don't know what you think people look like in real life but you looking at her face shape and seeing 30s is moronic.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Do you just not know any 30 year old women? They usually have hair with a few grey bits in it and laugh lines and crows feet. Maybe your perception is influenced by actresses and streamers that wear a kg of makeup, but normal women start getting heavier lines in their face around 27-30.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >They usually have hair with a few grey bits in it and laugh lines and crows feet.
          That's not what I said. Her face shape with visible jowls and dropped eyes looks like someone in their 40s at least. The graphics are dated so there's not as much wrinkling detail. She's modelled on her voice actress from DS2 and Remake, who was about 40 in DS2 and is about 50 now.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          most guys on Ganker have absolutely no idea what a real woman looks like. their entire perspective is through the lens of the internet connection in their mom's basement

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          She doesn't just have a couple of grey hairs though, she has a very middle aged looking face. Isaac is meant to be in his 40s, I imagine she is meant to be of a similar age.

  23. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >but you will never see people re-writing books, re-painting art pieces, and editing out parts

    Are you trolling or stupid?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Frick off nitpicker

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      (OP)
      >but you will never see people re-writing books, re-painting art pieces, and editing out parts

      behold, two seconds later
      >>and expect people would receive that well.. so why do it to games?
      moron

  24. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    fake fans, fake outrage

  25. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Actually authors rewrite books plenty.
    Movies get many rereleases.
    And painters often have many versions of the same subject over the years.

    The big difference here is that games are made by companies which over time can consist of completely different people. Also the purpose of companies is profit.
    For these 2 reasons remakes differ considerably from the original.

  26. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Based and /thread, Ganker exposed as incelic and moronic again

  27. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    she doesn't look old here
    also it's a different game

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Yes she does
      And t's the same actress

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        so what if it's the same voice actress?
        Are you implying Sponge Bob's voice actor looks like Sponge Bob in real life?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Because she was already modelled on the actress in DS2, they are bringing DS1 in line with that.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            So you're saying making the model for one of the main characters was too expensive and they had to cut corners?

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >I have absolutely no idea how game development works

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Guess I'll just lie and hope they buy it rather than admit I didn't know what I was talking about

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Are you quoting me or the devs?

  28. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >I really don't understand the gall it takes to think you know better than the original devs and change things up.
    Arrogant fricks that can't even produce a quality product in a clear vidya airway can't talk for shit

  29. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    This whole game is just a disappointment. Not only did they change things like these (because of ideology or laziness) but they didnt add anything interesting.
    No cut content or necros, no cool new scares, no neat hallucinations. They even removed some things. Its just an inferior version with pretty graphics and DS2 gameplay.

  30. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Maybe games aren't considered real works of art but you will never see people re-writing books, re-painting art pieces, and editing out parts of movies and expect people would receive that well..
    That happens all the time actually, but anyway, if you prefer the original, play the original.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *