Linux still has issues with a number of wifi cards. I remember having that issue 15 years ago when I was just getting into college and someone convinced me to install linux mint on my sony vaio that I eventually spilled macaroni juice on... Had to do some weird configs to get that thing working.
Ah. The memories.
I think you haven't done any/much performance tuning and don't closely monitor metrics you may either avoid or miss a lot of the problems have. Despite what Ganker tells you Nvidia has stability problems all the same just their features are generally more mature than AMD. Half of the known issues for any Adrenalin patch are things you would miss if you're monitoring your power consumption, GPU clocks, and frame times.
If you don't constantly stare at your GPU metrics and overclock you card to instability, you won't notice the vast majority of issues that AMD drivers have/had.
I've had an AMD PC for many years, simply because their stuff is cheaper for the same performance
afaik nvidia makes better gpus for some professional programs. For vidya, AMD is probably the better deal.
Never had an issue with either nvidia or amd drivers, always using whql releases
If all you want is to play games there's 0 reason to not just ditch garden gnomevidia out of your life forever, it's anywhere else we are stuck with them for eternity but in just media consumption nobody can make the excuse that they are "cutting edge" when most people are rocking a rtx3060 or 1050 and they are doing just fine without muh ray tracing hacks
>Am i lucky or NVIDIA is running a shill campaign?
Since at least 2006.
https://web.archive.org/web/20130915125814/https://consumerist.com/2006/02/06/did-nvidia-hire-online-actors-to-promote-their-products/
https://web.archive.org/web/20130915143001/https://consumerist.com/2006/02/06/nvidias-perez-they-act-as-our-voice/
>game runs like shit on Nvidia hardware
It's the games fault. >game runs like shit on AMD hardware
It's AMDs fault.
I owned both Nvidia and AMD PCs in recent years and neither gave me issues. No crashes. No bluescreens. Just played everything fine. Whenever a game had issues it was actually on that developer rather than driver related.
Nvidia have successfully brainwashed their consumers into thinking that they can do no wrong.
When AMD has trouble people rightfully call them out on it but whenever Nvidia fail to ship a gameready driver on time or an issue related to Nvidia hardware arises people never blame Nvidia for it. Either the players are too stupid to use the GPUs correctly or the developers fucked up somehow. It's quite literally a cult at this point.
When you can't run low-level LLMs to power AI-generated dynamic speech and incidents by NPCs, AMD will have a mess on their hands.
ROCOM isn't cutting it.
Yeah, this is the Nvidiot brainwashing. The market share of AI capable cards is like 10% according to steam hardware survey. The most popular card is a GTX 1650. No one is going to add AI to video games until the majority of platforms can support it. You can blame AMD all you want but the fact is there's going to be people using GTX 2000 series 5 years from now, and it's probably going to be a huge amount of people.
Reminder that even though FSR 3 will run on most GPUS - only the 7000 Radeon series has AI cores on AMDs side for them to utilize. FSR 3 on anything but a 7000 GPU will just be a slightly changed FSR 2.
FSR 3 on 7000 meanwhile will work like DLSS does by utilizing the 7000 series AI cores - on hardware level.
I do most of my productivity work and browsing on my laptop, and my actual gaming on an AMD CPU/GPU PC or steam deck. I can't recall any AMD specific issues, usually It's just me seething over how shit Unreal Engine 4 is with its stutter.
>Devs make games with nvidia in mind
I don't know how true that statement is, because while it's true Nvidia has overwhelming marketshare in the pc space, AMD powers both the major consoles that push graphics. I'd say it's more like 50/50
garden gnomevidia propaganda
AMD keks only win if games get crippled on release with bad driver support.
One is questionably expensive, and the other is insanely expensive.
It's the opposite on Linux.
Not telling anyone to use Linux btw. Just lmaoing about it
Linux still has issues with a number of wifi cards. I remember having that issue 15 years ago when I was just getting into college and someone convinced me to install linux mint on my sony vaio that I eventually spilled macaroni juice on... Had to do some weird configs to get that thing working.
Ah. The memories.
>have AMD CPU and GPU
>no problem
Am i lucky or NVIDIA is running a shill campaign?
You just don't do much, you're a simple man living a simple life.
I think you haven't done any/much performance tuning and don't closely monitor metrics you may either avoid or miss a lot of the problems have. Despite what Ganker tells you Nvidia has stability problems all the same just their features are generally more mature than AMD. Half of the known issues for any Adrenalin patch are things you would miss if you're monitoring your power consumption, GPU clocks, and frame times.
I don't know what ESL spirit I channeled for that first sentence but I apologize to any readers.
Can i have a non-talmudic version of this post?
If you don't constantly stare at your GPU metrics and overclock you card to instability, you won't notice the vast majority of issues that AMD drivers have/had.
I've had an AMD PC for many years, simply because their stuff is cheaper for the same performance
afaik nvidia makes better gpus for some professional programs. For vidya, AMD is probably the better deal.
Never had an issue with either nvidia or amd drivers, always using whql releases
Quite literally, when are they not running a shill campaign? Endless lies about performance issues, when their cards cost several times more.
If all you want is to play games there's 0 reason to not just ditch garden gnomevidia out of your life forever, it's anywhere else we are stuck with them for eternity but in just media consumption nobody can make the excuse that they are "cutting edge" when most people are rocking a rtx3060 or 1050 and they are doing just fine without muh ray tracing hacks
>Am i lucky or NVIDIA is running a shill campaign?
Since at least 2006.
https://web.archive.org/web/20130915125814/https://consumerist.com/2006/02/06/did-nvidia-hire-online-actors-to-promote-their-products/
https://web.archive.org/web/20130915143001/https://consumerist.com/2006/02/06/nvidias-perez-they-act-as-our-voice/
When I used to have HD7950 and Windows 7 until 2019, I had to manually troubleshoot every new release.
Especially mods.
I have Linux, amd cpu, and amd gpu, I have never had any problems with AMD while playing a game via proton.
More like
>game runs like shit on Nvidia hardware
It's the games fault.
>game runs like shit on AMD hardware
It's AMDs fault.
I owned both Nvidia and AMD PCs in recent years and neither gave me issues. No crashes. No bluescreens. Just played everything fine. Whenever a game had issues it was actually on that developer rather than driver related.
>Why is it always like this?
Because Intel will always be better
Nvidia have successfully brainwashed their consumers into thinking that they can do no wrong.
When AMD has trouble people rightfully call them out on it but whenever Nvidia fail to ship a gameready driver on time or an issue related to Nvidia hardware arises people never blame Nvidia for it. Either the players are too stupid to use the GPUs correctly or the developers fucked up somehow. It's quite literally a cult at this point.
AMD sucks ass at A.I. stuff
It's nvidia's world right now.
Sir - this is a videogame board.
Ganker is down the hall and to the left.
When you can't run low-level LLMs to power AI-generated dynamic speech and incidents by NPCs, AMD will have a mess on their hands.
ROCOM isn't cutting it.
Steam bans games that use AI, so I don't care. Go seethe elsewhere rajeesh, you will never be a game dev or artist.
The RNDA 3 series has AI cores that are nearly on par with Nvidias.
They aren't that far behind. But like
said. We are far away from AI shit in games. Legislators need to figure out whats going on before anyone is gonna invest seriously into it.
Yeah, this is the Nvidiot brainwashing. The market share of AI capable cards is like 10% according to steam hardware survey. The most popular card is a GTX 1650. No one is going to add AI to video games until the majority of platforms can support it. You can blame AMD all you want but the fact is there's going to be people using GTX 2000 series 5 years from now, and it's probably going to be a huge amount of people.
when i save up enough i will ditch Nvidia forever for AMD.
Reminder that even though FSR 3 will run on most GPUS - only the 7000 Radeon series has AI cores on AMDs side for them to utilize. FSR 3 on anything but a 7000 GPU will just be a slightly changed FSR 2.
FSR 3 on 7000 meanwhile will work like DLSS does by utilizing the 7000 series AI cores - on hardware level.
I do most of my productivity work and browsing on my laptop, and my actual gaming on an AMD CPU/GPU PC or steam deck. I can't recall any AMD specific issues, usually It's just me seething over how shit Unreal Engine 4 is with its stutter.
Nah this shit cant be real
A human cant be this fucking unaware
AMD users had no rain rendering in their games during the event specifically centered around rain in Hunt Showdown, it was quite funny
Based AMD giving you better visibility in multiplayer games
Devs make games with nvidia in mind so you trying to game the system just kicks you in the ass.
>Devs make games with nvidia in mind
I don't know how true that statement is, because while it's true Nvidia has overwhelming marketshare in the pc space, AMD powers both the major consoles that push graphics. I'd say it's more like 50/50
werks on linux.
>every other game older than 2013 has issues with nvidia cards