>schizo
The N. Sane Trilogy, CTR Nitro-Fueled, Crash 4 and Crash on the run all have references to Spyro, they will 100% reference Spyro in Wumpa League
Schizos are the ones who still think Wumpa League isn't coming. TfB teased that they are working on a new game not to long ago, even in recently approved interviews they keep acting like "Huhhh a new game?? LOL have no idea what you are talking about ;)"
>muh gay dragons
That's what you saw, that's on you
2 years ago
Anonymous
No, thats on the artist. I already know they are a furry artist.
They intentionally hired furries and it killed the franchise because everyone could feel it was just thinly veiled fetish fuel as soon as they turned the game on. I don't really care anon, its already history.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Your brain has been poisoned
The only people thinking that were moronic anons such as yourself, small children weren't playing the game and thinking EURGH BARA DRAGONS
2 years ago
Anonymous
I'm fine with you seeing me that way. A game franchise had to die for it and I'm still okay with that.
Luckily the devs seem to be pariahs nowadays so they won't be long for this world. They won't be able to ruin anything then.
2 years ago
Anonymous
My sister was playing the game and even she could tell there was something fetishy about the dragons, You homosexuals aren't normal don't become delusional like yurigays and just accept your tastes are niche as frick.
2 years ago
Anonymous
What would some moronic shitposter on Ganker know about 'normal'?
2 years ago
Anonymous
what would a subhuman baragay know? Why are you trying to pretend to be above anyone. Get back in the underworld with me where you belong, the human world isn't for either of us.
2 years ago
Anonymous
They can see barabait as barabait at face value instead of gaslighting and saying it isn't there because you want to corrupt the youth.
You people are so heathenish that the counter culture of anon is to be moralistic.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>corrupt the youth
You're on Ganker
Stop clutching those pearls and joining in with the moronic contrarianism
2 years ago
Anonymous
No. we are in a thread discussing how a bunch of homosexual scalies and furries killed 2 different franchises when given them.
They killed them both in the same fashion.
The problem is the baragays, they shouldn't be around anything with children.
2 years ago
Anonymous
hating baragays shitting up good and cute games is fricking contrarianism, get that through your thick fricking skull. WHY the hell do you defend it so much? do you love the shitty designs that much or are you just insecure?
2 years ago
Anonymous
is not*
frick
2 years ago
Anonymous
It's more your obsession with them and somehow thinking that redesigned dragons killed the Spyro remake
A moronic way of thinking if you look at pic related and just start huffing and stomping your feet about scalies in muh vidya
2 years ago
Anonymous
Yeah I wouldn't let my kids anywhere near this. This screams fetish material for losers.
2 years ago
Anonymous
It takes a loser who's well-acquainted with fetish material to think that >posts on Ganker >has kids
lol
2 years ago
Anonymous
delusional
2 years ago
Anonymous
They're just ugly and most designs aren't as simple as that guy's. You homosexuals insert your shitty fetish into a traditionally cute game and then get surprised when people are put off by it. The remake of course is garbage for MANY reasons, but you baragays ruined the first game and it wasn't just the dragons. Gnasty, the gnorcs, and the dragons are FAR uglier than they should have been and concept art was FAR more promising for the gnorcs and some dragons
yes anon, a ps4 game is going to look different than a ps1 game
I want to see a fresh spin on an old game, not taking the old game and upscaling it to 1080p
2 years ago
Anonymous
I want good aesthetics
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Dude you don't get it! You cannot expect a dragon to STILL look like a dragon in 2022! Dragons looking like dragons are a thing of the past! Dragons MUST look like hideus crossbreeds between a pig and a gorilla in order to be up to doOOote! That's called progress, dude!
2 years ago
Anonymous
The frick are you talking about, Spyro looks great in the remake.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Have you ever seen the other """dragons"""?
2 years ago
Anonymous
Big bara dragons, what's not to like.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Yeah, they look even better now. Every single one of them has a unique model, compared to the PS1 game where it was just the same 5 or 6 models being recycled over and over with different colors.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Dude you don't get it! You cannot expect a dragon to STILL look like a dragon in 2022! Dragons looking like dragons are a thing of the past! Dragons MUST look like hideus crossbreeds between a pig and a gorilla in order to be up to doOOote! That's called progress, dude!
Both of you are so astoundingly wrong that it perfectly captures what's wrong with the two extremes in Spyro discourse. On one hand, you have a Reignited gay that's so fricking insecure that he can't even bring himself to admit that a level stripped mostly of its color and dreamlike atmosphere (something Spyro was commonly known for right before it became akin to believing in horoscopes immediately after Reignited came along) is an objective downgrade. Then you have the guy who's so drunk on nostalgia that he's unironically arguing that the generic literal pallet swap medieval dragons are better than Reignited's vast bestiary that still includes the generic medieval dragons he prefers meaning that he's upset for being given exactly what he wants and more.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>discussing art >"objective downgrade"
brainlet
2 years ago
Anonymous
I get it anon. You shrug your shoulders and go back to sitting on your ass and watching tv after hearing that a famous painting of a sunset was recreated using shit as paint. You don't care because you're so cool and above it all. The thing is though, your complete apathy is irrelevant to the actual quality between the two pieces as everyone with a heathy mental psyche will be reduced to OLD GOOD NEW BAD-spewing caveman because the ability to understand and recognize soul is intrinsically human.
You might say that's an extreme example but everyone will look back on the original Icy Peaks more fondly than the remade version and it isn't hard to see why. The original puts people at ease and conveys a sense of fantasy that makes it memorable. No one will look at the new version, see the dead colors and the unity assets that make it look indistinguishable from any other game should Spyro be edited out, and say that it's better. Even now, no one really puts any effort into defending it besides giving out weak appeals to higher graphic fidelity or that it's different but being different is a meaningless statement as what matters is whether putting a new spin on the original succeeds or fails at giving it it's own special appeal. Not sure why this is so hard for you people to concede. It's not like Reignited didn't breathe new life into certain areas to really give it some newfound appeal but it's so nonsensical to feel the need to defend every change it made this radically. It comes off like this was your first exposure to Spyro and that any concession that it faltered somewhere means that your experience wasn't definitive.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Let's remake FF7. But let's put dreadlocks on Sephiroth just because LMAO! >WTF is this shit? >NOOOO you can't complain!! You should be grateful the rest of the characters are still the same!!
Loads of people also prefer pineapple on pizza, doesn't mean they're not braindead morons
The first LoS game was pure shit through and through, second one wasn't much better, and the third one is only half decent, but even then it's still just a mediocre God of War ripoff
People liked the stories because they're scalies. People don't like the gameplay other than the free flying in the third (?) one, they just want to frick Cynder.
Even the story in the game was DeviantART fanfiction-tier garbage. >ohhh UR DUH CHOSEN 1 >ohhh IT IS UR DESTINY >ohhh LE PURPLE DRAGON IS EVIL "DARK MASTER" >ohhh HE'S GONNA DESTROY THE WORLD YOU GOTTA SAVE THE WORLD
Even when I played these games as a teen I thought the story was easily the weakest part of the game
It was almost the exact same as the first one just with a few extra collectibles and a very slightly improved combat system. Hell, they outright recycled bosses from the first game, multiple times.
Blame toys for bob. They fricking squandered the remake. They cared more about making their scaly dragon daddies than actually making a great trilogy of remakes.
ah yes all those 6 year olds playing the game for artstyle. homie it was just 3d and you could collect things. no kid gave a penguin shit about some artstyle bullshit
It's mainly the art direction. But I also felt they were kinda lacking in anything worthwhile. To me a good remake should try to enhance the game beyond just better graphics. Tony Hawk Pro Skater 1+2 + Crash Team Racing: Nitro Fueled are great examples of remakes where you could feel the love being put into it by the developers.
Spyro Reignited felt very lukewarm. It plays pretty much the same but beyond that not much is really different. If anything it tend to feel worse since alot of the charm of the originals were just gone and in their place was nothing. Even something as simple as the main menu, just being a jpg that you choose which game to play just felt so dead. It felt like they were more focused on every dragon in 1 having a unique design over the smaller details that really tie everything together.
It felt like they did the bare minimum. I really felt this when I got to the end of all three and they played the same credit sequence for all 3 games. It all just felt lame. Sure they play exactly like the original, but if you just wanted to play a better looking version of the old games why not emulate them and just bump up the rendering software? People forget but PS1 games do genuinely look good.
It just felt like so much more could have been done. 20 years later people still talk about the PS1 games, 4 years later and hardly anyone talks about Reignited.
Not him, but it is if you're making a mascot platformer that's meant to appeal to everyone, and not just the losers here that need everything to be extremely hard
Even Naughty Dog realized that Crash 1's challenge was way too high, which Jason Rubin admits too, which is why, while challenging, 2 and 3 aren't on the level of challenge as the first game
too much stuff to collect and it isn't fun to collect stuff. but it's optional stuff so can just skip collecting everything.
otherwise i found the game pretty decent fun
It takes time to make a classic Spyro while also exploiting current gen consoles, Spyro 4 is probably going to have huge areas for different minigames and quests without portals as in Year of the Dragon
all I'm saying is that I played Spyro when I was 6 years old, I had lots of fun, but I have never felt the need to play Spyro again since becoming an adult.
Why haven't you grown up? We're literally talking about a game where you sprint around to collect brightly-colored shapes in a nonthreatening Disney-style fantasy setting. What's wrong with you?
>gets questioned as to why he's still obsessed with children's media >lashes out defensively
you are on the same level as bronies and disney adults. it's time to grow up.
whether or not they're making Spyro 4 should have absolutely no bearing on your life unless you're looking for a game to get your own child.
Maybe you should go back and play Spyro again. You'll find that it's aged gracefully and perhaps regain some semblance of that childlike optimism that every adult needs that you tragically lost at some point in your life.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>You'll find that it's aged gracefully
Now that you mention it, I think there's no game from the PS1 era that aged better than Spyro.
Almost every other game now feels painfully old and busted, but somehow Spyro still remains pleasant to look at
2 years ago
Anonymous
It pretty much pushed the PS1 to its limit in terms of raw power didn't it?
Hopefully not. They'd probably ruin it. If they're not going to go back to 1's design philosophy with 2's gameplay improvements (like abilities) then I'd rather not have another game. Minigames and extra characters ruin replayability tbh
based
2 is great, but only because of the double jump glitch making it feel like 1 at times. I genuinely couldn't even have fun playing 3, it was a slog through and through
pretty levels aren't good levels, I didn't say 3 was ugly. I did enjoy a sparse few, but the vast majority are genuinely awful, whether it be shitty circular level design, small maps with portals or the fricking minigames
>Furies for bob touch Spyro >Kill the IP forever >Get given Crash because they can't be trusted with anything >Also kill the IP forever
Never trust furies
Its not helped at all that unlike Crash, Spyro never took off in Japan, since the ports of Spyro 1 and 2 were complete trash
Awful camera, Spyro moves slower, and charging doesn't have him run as long as you hold the button, and more of short bursts, which follows him into Spyro 2 where he can't move fast underwater besides small bursts, Sparx is also always green and doesn't change color, making it very hard to tell how much health you have left unless you look extremely close at the effects coming off of him
The Sparx things is only really a thing because they were pushing the Pocket Station in Japan, and you could raise other dragonflies who have abilities (which Sparx's upgrades in 3 are based on) that are all different colors
When Insomniac were developing Spyro, they were inspired by Mario 64, since they found movement to be very fun in that game, and wanted Spyro to feel fun to move around with, the Japanese version of the games aren't fun to move around in at all
Sony's Japanese team were extremely anal about how games should be for their releases, not feeling leaving western stuff as is would appeal to people over there, Crash got changed as well, so did a few other series
Spyro's movement changes were due to fears of "3D sickness" or motion sickness happening to Japanese people playing
But then you also have dumb shit like the signs everywhere in Spyro 1, that trigger by flaming them, when the game's controls are simple enough, and there's already dragons in the game to explain things to the player
some stupid bullshit about the 3d movement causing motion sickness. It was early 3d and the focus group they had were probably old as frick. Can't imagine why no one bothered to play it first to see if it was fun or not
i should've specified. when the last original spyro game was released. no re-releases/remakes etc >the last time he was playable in anything was Crash Team Racing-Nitro Fueled
Oof
The last console game to have the original Spyro was A Hero's Tail, but the last game with the original over all pre-remakes was the shitty DS game, Shadow Legacy
The previous actual-Spyro game before Reignited was the Legend of Spryo series. Skylanders isn't a Spyro game at all, it just features him as an optional playable character.
Yeah it's great. It's what they deserve after years of making Skylanders, fricking up reignited and then stealing a new crash from Vicarious and Beenox.
The debate on the futures of Crash and Spyro is one of the few times where I can recall that the cynical doomers are the ones being more irrational than the unshakeable faithful optimists. To give a quick rundown >Toys for Bob and Beenox loved working on Crash and Spyro >Microsoft gives their developers more freedom in being able to choose what they want to make. Banjo's creators not wanting anything to do with him because they lost their creative spark has nothing to do with Crash and Spyro's creators' feelings towards them. >Psychonaughts 2 was critically acclaimed so they clearly don't have any reservations about making platformers. >It has not been that long and few year long gaps are not uncommon between franchise entry releases. >Spyro, being the way he's designed, likely takes more time to work on than Crash.
no but he will make cameo in wumpa league
based schizo
>schizo
The N. Sane Trilogy, CTR Nitro-Fueled, Crash 4 and Crash on the run all have references to Spyro, they will 100% reference Spyro in Wumpa League
that's not the schizo part lmao
Schizos are the ones who still think Wumpa League isn't coming. TfB teased that they are working on a new game not to long ago, even in recently approved interviews they keep acting like "Huhhh a new game?? LOL have no idea what you are talking about ;)"
good.
I'd rather not have them piss on Spyro's grave. He should rest in peace.
Disagree completely. The remastered trilogy was very faithful to the original games and really well done.
I was looking foward to a possible sequel.
It didn't feel like the original spyro at all. It felt like playing some scalie's fangame.
The remakes were good and the Elora r34 was a bonus surprise.
>It didn't feel like the original spyro at all
Because you're not a small child anymore
No, it was all the homoeroticism with the dragons. None of that stuff was in the original games.
>muh gay dragons
That's what you saw, that's on you
No, thats on the artist. I already know they are a furry artist.
They intentionally hired furries and it killed the franchise because everyone could feel it was just thinly veiled fetish fuel as soon as they turned the game on. I don't really care anon, its already history.
Your brain has been poisoned
The only people thinking that were moronic anons such as yourself, small children weren't playing the game and thinking EURGH BARA DRAGONS
I'm fine with you seeing me that way. A game franchise had to die for it and I'm still okay with that.
Luckily the devs seem to be pariahs nowadays so they won't be long for this world. They won't be able to ruin anything then.
My sister was playing the game and even she could tell there was something fetishy about the dragons, You homosexuals aren't normal don't become delusional like yurigays and just accept your tastes are niche as frick.
What would some moronic shitposter on Ganker know about 'normal'?
what would a subhuman baragay know? Why are you trying to pretend to be above anyone. Get back in the underworld with me where you belong, the human world isn't for either of us.
They can see barabait as barabait at face value instead of gaslighting and saying it isn't there because you want to corrupt the youth.
You people are so heathenish that the counter culture of anon is to be moralistic.
>corrupt the youth
You're on Ganker
Stop clutching those pearls and joining in with the moronic contrarianism
No. we are in a thread discussing how a bunch of homosexual scalies and furries killed 2 different franchises when given them.
They killed them both in the same fashion.
The problem is the baragays, they shouldn't be around anything with children.
hating baragays shitting up good and cute games is fricking contrarianism, get that through your thick fricking skull. WHY the hell do you defend it so much? do you love the shitty designs that much or are you just insecure?
is not*
frick
It's more your obsession with them and somehow thinking that redesigned dragons killed the Spyro remake
A moronic way of thinking if you look at pic related and just start huffing and stomping your feet about scalies in muh vidya
Yeah I wouldn't let my kids anywhere near this. This screams fetish material for losers.
It takes a loser who's well-acquainted with fetish material to think that
>posts on Ganker
>has kids
lol
delusional
They're just ugly and most designs aren't as simple as that guy's. You homosexuals insert your shitty fetish into a traditionally cute game and then get surprised when people are put off by it. The remake of course is garbage for MANY reasons, but you baragays ruined the first game and it wasn't just the dragons. Gnasty, the gnorcs, and the dragons are FAR uglier than they should have been and concept art was FAR more promising for the gnorcs and some dragons
Not fun of spyro really, but got the remakes as a gift. Seemed like the original games but with shiny graphics. Nothing to complain really.
Faithful my ass lmfao
How was it not?
uhhhh MUH SKYBOXES MUH COLOR THEORY AND THIS RANDOM ONE-OFF CHARACTER LOOKS KINDA DIFFERENT THEREFOR BAD
-/v/
I said this
yes anon, a ps4 game is going to look different than a ps1 game
I want to see a fresh spin on an old game, not taking the old game and upscaling it to 1080p
I want good aesthetics
>Dude you don't get it! You cannot expect a dragon to STILL look like a dragon in 2022! Dragons looking like dragons are a thing of the past! Dragons MUST look like hideus crossbreeds between a pig and a gorilla in order to be up to doOOote! That's called progress, dude!
The frick are you talking about, Spyro looks great in the remake.
Have you ever seen the other """dragons"""?
Big bara dragons, what's not to like.
Yeah, they look even better now. Every single one of them has a unique model, compared to the PS1 game where it was just the same 5 or 6 models being recycled over and over with different colors.
Both of you are so astoundingly wrong that it perfectly captures what's wrong with the two extremes in Spyro discourse. On one hand, you have a Reignited gay that's so fricking insecure that he can't even bring himself to admit that a level stripped mostly of its color and dreamlike atmosphere (something Spyro was commonly known for right before it became akin to believing in horoscopes immediately after Reignited came along) is an objective downgrade. Then you have the guy who's so drunk on nostalgia that he's unironically arguing that the generic literal pallet swap medieval dragons are better than Reignited's vast bestiary that still includes the generic medieval dragons he prefers meaning that he's upset for being given exactly what he wants and more.
>discussing art
>"objective downgrade"
brainlet
I get it anon. You shrug your shoulders and go back to sitting on your ass and watching tv after hearing that a famous painting of a sunset was recreated using shit as paint. You don't care because you're so cool and above it all. The thing is though, your complete apathy is irrelevant to the actual quality between the two pieces as everyone with a heathy mental psyche will be reduced to OLD GOOD NEW BAD-spewing caveman because the ability to understand and recognize soul is intrinsically human.
You might say that's an extreme example but everyone will look back on the original Icy Peaks more fondly than the remade version and it isn't hard to see why. The original puts people at ease and conveys a sense of fantasy that makes it memorable. No one will look at the new version, see the dead colors and the unity assets that make it look indistinguishable from any other game should Spyro be edited out, and say that it's better. Even now, no one really puts any effort into defending it besides giving out weak appeals to higher graphic fidelity or that it's different but being different is a meaningless statement as what matters is whether putting a new spin on the original succeeds or fails at giving it it's own special appeal. Not sure why this is so hard for you people to concede. It's not like Reignited didn't breathe new life into certain areas to really give it some newfound appeal but it's so nonsensical to feel the need to defend every change it made this radically. It comes off like this was your first exposure to Spyro and that any concession that it faltered somewhere means that your experience wasn't definitive.
>Let's remake FF7. But let's put dreadlocks on Sephiroth just because LMAO!
>WTF is this shit?
>NOOOO you can't complain!! You should be grateful the rest of the characters are still the same!!
I hate Unreal so much it is women
it WAS more than faithful to his ass
His grave was already exhumed and shit in multiple times with Legend of Spyro trilogy and then they hung it up in a noose on display with Skylanders.
There's not much worse they could do to the series other than outright cancel it entirely.
Loads of people liked Legend of Spyro, for better or for worse.
Loads of people also prefer pineapple on pizza, doesn't mean they're not braindead morons
The first LoS game was pure shit through and through, second one wasn't much better, and the third one is only half decent, but even then it's still just a mediocre God of War ripoff
People liked the stories because they're scalies. People don't like the gameplay other than the free flying in the third (?) one, they just want to frick Cynder.
Even the story in the game was DeviantART fanfiction-tier garbage.
>ohhh UR DUH CHOSEN 1
>ohhh IT IS UR DESTINY
>ohhh LE PURPLE DRAGON IS EVIL "DARK MASTER"
>ohhh HE'S GONNA DESTROY THE WORLD YOU GOTTA SAVE THE WORLD
Even when I played these games as a teen I thought the story was easily the weakest part of the game
The second one was the best out of that god forsaken trilogy
It was almost the exact same as the first one just with a few extra collectibles and a very slightly improved combat system. Hell, they outright recycled bosses from the first game, multiple times.
>skylanders was....LE BAD
Try playing it.
It's a generic puzzle platformer made for kids age 6 and below, there's not much to play
shill
Blame toys for bob. They fricking squandered the remake. They cared more about making their scaly dragon daddies than actually making a great trilogy of remakes.
I played them and I thought it was good. What are your gripes with the remake?
Maybe the fact that it completely raped the artstyle (one of the main selling points of the game)?
ah yes all those 6 year olds playing the game for artstyle. homie it was just 3d and you could collect things. no kid gave a penguin shit about some artstyle bullshit
>artstyle
>"main selling point of the game"
He said ONE OF the main selling pointS of the game, which is true, I see a lot of people praising Spyro for it's dream-like aesthetic.
yes, you see people saying that now, 20 years later
the "art style" was not one of the selling points of the game when it was actually being sold
It's mainly the art direction. But I also felt they were kinda lacking in anything worthwhile. To me a good remake should try to enhance the game beyond just better graphics. Tony Hawk Pro Skater 1+2 + Crash Team Racing: Nitro Fueled are great examples of remakes where you could feel the love being put into it by the developers.
Spyro Reignited felt very lukewarm. It plays pretty much the same but beyond that not much is really different. If anything it tend to feel worse since alot of the charm of the originals were just gone and in their place was nothing. Even something as simple as the main menu, just being a jpg that you choose which game to play just felt so dead. It felt like they were more focused on every dragon in 1 having a unique design over the smaller details that really tie everything together.
It felt like they did the bare minimum. I really felt this when I got to the end of all three and they played the same credit sequence for all 3 games. It all just felt lame. Sure they play exactly like the original, but if you just wanted to play a better looking version of the old games why not emulate them and just bump up the rendering software? People forget but PS1 games do genuinely look good.
It just felt like so much more could have been done. 20 years later people still talk about the PS1 games, 4 years later and hardly anyone talks about Reignited.
1 got most of the effort and it shows, but 2 and 3 were always sort of janky.
2 and 3 are the ones people cared more about, for them to just be pushed aside for 1 felt really misguided. 1 is by far the worst of the original 3.
Maybe it's nostalgia but I also think the levels in 2 and 3 were so much better than the ones in 1. They had so much more to them.
What? 2's easily the weakest. 1 has the best design, with no backtracking or special abilities you need to buy.
given how Crash 4 turned out that's probably a good thing
what's the issue with crash 4?
you have to replay levels too many times
levels are way too long
the difficulty is too high
the extra characters are lame
the cutscenes are cringe
that's all true but the levels are pretty damn good
>difficulty is too high
i dont think this was a problem with the game anon
Not him, but it is if you're making a mascot platformer that's meant to appeal to everyone, and not just the losers here that need everything to be extremely hard
Even Naughty Dog realized that Crash 1's challenge was way too high, which Jason Rubin admits too, which is why, while challenging, 2 and 3 aren't on the level of challenge as the first game
spyro's are piss easy, which is fine because it's games aimed for little kids
Spyro is aimed for all ages as well, and was said they added in the missions in the sequels to be "extra challenge" for those looking at it
As a whole Spyro's design philosophy is pretty much a contrast to Crash's, as they're far more relaxed, but I wouldn't say that's a bad thing
too much stuff to collect and it isn't fun to collect stuff. but it's optional stuff so can just skip collecting everything.
otherwise i found the game pretty decent fun
It wasn't remotely fun
Crash flopped, it's your fault.
Don't license the project out to people that are trying to make deviant art smut instead of a fun video game next time.
>Game is about dragons
>Hire art directior that has done nothing but draw dragons his whole life
What exactly is the problem here?
The problem is Ganker contrarianism, "ree it's different so it's BAD"
It's not fricking contrarianism to not want baragay designs in a FRICKING SPYRO game
>noooo big daddy dragons BAD!
seething soiboi detected
It takes time to make a classic Spyro while also exploiting current gen consoles, Spyro 4 is probably going to have huge areas for different minigames and quests without portals as in Year of the Dragon
Even if they did it wouldn't be nearly as good as the original 3.
AFAIK they’re not working on any Spyro game atm, but there might be new Crash games coming at some point if things go well.
>Source: trust me
Frick crash, I want my spyro game
More crash would be good. I've probably played all the crash clones already. Maybe missing something who knows
Maaaaan I just want a new Spyro in the vein of the old. Or at least somewhere between them and Hero's Tail.
how much of an underdeveloped manchild do you have to be, to get upset about a brainless collectathon franchise for children?
Frick you homie, go back to making commerwatch 2 threads
all I'm saying is that I played Spyro when I was 6 years old, I had lots of fun, but I have never felt the need to play Spyro again since becoming an adult.
Why haven't you grown up? We're literally talking about a game where you sprint around to collect brightly-colored shapes in a nonthreatening Disney-style fantasy setting. What's wrong with you?
Where do you think you are?
>I no longer care about thing
>That means you shouldn't either
Consider the necktie and doorknob solution
>gets questioned as to why he's still obsessed with children's media
>lashes out defensively
you are on the same level as bronies and disney adults. it's time to grow up.
whether or not they're making Spyro 4 should have absolutely no bearing on your life unless you're looking for a game to get your own child.
>you must be a "grown up" like me and shit on other people for liking things that you don't like!
okay boomer
Maybe you should go back and play Spyro again. You'll find that it's aged gracefully and perhaps regain some semblance of that childlike optimism that every adult needs that you tragically lost at some point in your life.
>You'll find that it's aged gracefully
Now that you mention it, I think there's no game from the PS1 era that aged better than Spyro.
Almost every other game now feels painfully old and busted, but somehow Spyro still remains pleasant to look at
It pretty much pushed the PS1 to its limit in terms of raw power didn't it?
And thank God for that, if it's gonna be made by TfB...
Hopefully not. They'd probably ruin it. If they're not going to go back to 1's design philosophy with 2's gameplay improvements (like abilities) then I'd rather not have another game. Minigames and extra characters ruin replayability tbh
this
1 was already kino, 2 and 3 ruined it with dumb minigames, forced backtracking and alternate characters that all play worse
Superb taste. I feel like a Spyro 4 would have more character switching like the new Crash and lose that focus you mention. Plus, no Copeland no buy.
based
2 is great, but only because of the double jump glitch making it feel like 1 at times. I genuinely couldn't even have fun playing 3, it was a slog through and through
3 had some nice levels
pretty levels aren't good levels, I didn't say 3 was ugly. I did enjoy a sparse few, but the vast majority are genuinely awful, whether it be shitty circular level design, small maps with portals or the fricking minigames
>Furies for bob touch Spyro
>Kill the IP forever
>Get given Crash because they can't be trusted with anything
>Also kill the IP forever
Never trust furies
At this point, I've accepted that Spyro won't get anything beyond cameos in Crash's games
Like I get that Spyro doesn't sell to the levels of Crash, but from what I understand Spyro games still sell very well
>Spyro doesn't sell to the levels of Crash
Frick this gay earth
Its not helped at all that unlike Crash, Spyro never took off in Japan, since the ports of Spyro 1 and 2 were complete trash
Awful camera, Spyro moves slower, and charging doesn't have him run as long as you hold the button, and more of short bursts, which follows him into Spyro 2 where he can't move fast underwater besides small bursts, Sparx is also always green and doesn't change color, making it very hard to tell how much health you have left unless you look extremely close at the effects coming off of him
The Sparx things is only really a thing because they were pushing the Pocket Station in Japan, and you could raise other dragonflies who have abilities (which Sparx's upgrades in 3 are based on) that are all different colors
When Insomniac were developing Spyro, they were inspired by Mario 64, since they found movement to be very fun in that game, and wanted Spyro to feel fun to move around with, the Japanese version of the games aren't fun to move around in at all
Why would they even make the Japan version so different instead of just a simple translation?
there were concerns with motion sickness due to the game's movement speed and camera (spyro 1 honestly doesn't have a great camera)
Sony's Japanese team were extremely anal about how games should be for their releases, not feeling leaving western stuff as is would appeal to people over there, Crash got changed as well, so did a few other series
Spyro's movement changes were due to fears of "3D sickness" or motion sickness happening to Japanese people playing
But then you also have dumb shit like the signs everywhere in Spyro 1, that trigger by flaming them, when the game's controls are simple enough, and there's already dragons in the game to explain things to the player
some stupid bullshit about the 3d movement causing motion sickness. It was early 3d and the focus group they had were probably old as frick. Can't imagine why no one bothered to play it first to see if it was fun or not
when was the last spyro game made? I had the first one and loved it as a kid
Spyro Reignited, the last time he was playable in anything was Crash Team Racing-Nitro Fueled
i should've specified. when the last original spyro game was released. no re-releases/remakes etc
>the last time he was playable in anything was Crash Team Racing-Nitro Fueled
Oof
The last console game to have the original Spyro was A Hero's Tail, but the last game with the original over all pre-remakes was the shitty DS game, Shadow Legacy
Oof
The previous actual-Spyro game before Reignited was the Legend of Spryo series. Skylanders isn't a Spyro game at all, it just features him as an optional playable character.
Didn't the devs get sent to the CoD mines? No chance in hell now.
They are back on working on Wumpa League
Yeah it's great. It's what they deserve after years of making Skylanders, fricking up reignited and then stealing a new crash from Vicarious and Beenox.
>Beenox
They were the ones that shat out nverted stages in crash 4, and in that moment they lost my respect.
Activision is fricking dead
kek looks like pedophiles for bob has a reputation now.
The debate on the futures of Crash and Spyro is one of the few times where I can recall that the cynical doomers are the ones being more irrational than the unshakeable faithful optimists. To give a quick rundown
>Toys for Bob and Beenox loved working on Crash and Spyro
>Microsoft gives their developers more freedom in being able to choose what they want to make. Banjo's creators not wanting anything to do with him because they lost their creative spark has nothing to do with Crash and Spyro's creators' feelings towards them.
>Psychonaughts 2 was critically acclaimed so they clearly don't have any reservations about making platformers.
>It has not been that long and few year long gaps are not uncommon between franchise entry releases.
>Spyro, being the way he's designed, likely takes more time to work on than Crash.
People don't want to buy filth like this. Its the kind of thing you have as a mod at some fan scene.