SQUARE ENIX GOING FULL SUNK COST ON NFTS

OH NO NO NO NO NO

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I still don't know what an NFT actually is

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Rere Pepe but you pay money for it

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        It really do be like that, but even we understood that the only way to truly keep a pepe rare was to never post it because as soon as its saved it loses its rarity

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          how much would this one go for? Ill email someone this Pepe for 1 bitcoin unless theres any higher bids.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            I will pay 1 (You)

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            I will trade you this one I made in paint. So it's ultra rare

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              SOVL

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        You don't even pay money for the pepe.
        You pay for a few bits that says that pepe is yours while thousands of redditors copy and post it DGAF.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It's like if you could sell your personal reaction image folder to the highest bidder.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      literally paying for a .jpg
      but to confirm that its actually yours and not someone elses you need to spend $600 in electricity costs and server time to verify the bitcoin that's attached to it, to make sure that its yours

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      you ever play a MMO game and you get a unique rare item? now imagine if only say 50 or so of those items exist in the whole game. imagine if you could sell that unique item to another player for in-game currency which you could then exchange for real currency/money. thats basically NFTs

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        So it's real money trading but with extra steps?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >now imagine if only say 50 or so of those items exist in the whole game
        there's already an MMO thats been doing this for 20 years anon
        but naturally Ganker-casuals dont play good games, let alone good MMOs

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >tfw I haven't played EVE in years
          >tfw I have several Original Blueprints chilling in a container somewhere, never to be used
          NFTs lmao.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >its like tf2 unusuals but it requires the processing power of a small town to function
        what a reasonable thing to sell fricking tomb raider and deus ex for

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Just want to point out that in no way shape of form is the blockchain required to do what anon has proposed here. In fact, Steam has been doing it for years.

        The point of blockchain is it's """"decentralized"""" which is completely pointless for a video game.

        So in reality, in this use case, "NFT" is simply being used as a buzzword to attempt to milk morons that think cryptocurrency is actual currency and not a ponzi scheme.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          The point of being decentralised is that anyone can speculate on the currency and items, not only people playing the game, the stuff can get memed and people will buy it just to try to make sure which cash and the value can skyrocket

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            And how is that meant to be a good thing?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            The stuff that skyrockets in "value" in CSGo and the like isn't happening because people want them. It's credit card fraud and money laundering. Someone needs to get money to someone else without tripping any red flags, so they "buy" something worthless for way too much money. Sometimes it's a reciprocal transaction so that 100 dodgy credit cards turns into $10000 of legit cash from "customers." Along the way some lucky idiots manage to sell their actually legit trash to some other gullible fool but the odds of this happening to you are so small it's not something you should advocate for. We're lucky NFTs have always been recognised as fraud and cancer since day 0, real money cash shops in games are also cancer backed by fraud and gamers shouldn't be so accepting of them.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        But you're selling JPG's. Which means that anyone with a screenshot capable device is now able to copy what you have. Items in MMOs work because you can't use that item outside the MMO, to my understanding NFT's are literal pictures that can be used anywhere.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >to my understanding NFT's are literal pictures that can be used anywhere.

          you dont understand anything. why would it be a picture? it can obviously be an item or any data

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >it can obviously be an item or any data
            Except ir cant because that would reqire infeasible amounts of processing power
            It's why NFTs are still just urls like that proof of concept demonstration instead of jpegs, even now.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              the amount of processing power it takes is why this idea is coming to fruition in the 2020s you utter genius

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >It's why NFTs are still just urls instead of jpegs even now
                Read, you butthurt moron. Try again after nfts become something more than paid broken links

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >to my understanding NFT's are literal pictures that can be used anywhere.

          You really should stop talking lol

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        That's not how game development works.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Dota 2 already does that and one of the lead programmers has already gone on big rants about how a basic database from the game admin's does the same fricking thing for cheaper since the item is worthless outside of the game.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Given SE's size and number of controlled franchises I think they're aiming to make the items worth something between their big hitter franchises, more than just within one game.
          Try to drive sales of Just Cause by including loot with attached tokens that can be transferred to like Kingdom Hearts and give you some cosmetic bonus or gameplay bonus.

          Something like that could only be coordinated from the studio executive level down however. And would require a lot of effort to build multiple franchise installments on the same engines or at least build in a lot of compatibility for data.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Its also a lot of man hours spent modeling and implementing objects in multiple games that only a tiny fraction of the user base will ever see let alone use

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              ....
              That sounds exactly like something Square Enix would do.
              They're masters at throwing away moronic amounts of money.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Thing I don't get is why they'd bother. I mean, Valve takes a cut of every CSGo skin that's bought and sold because they control the marketplace. SE doesn't control the marketplace for whatever token they are building this on so they can only guarantee money for the initial offering and not the repeat trades. If they make a SE token that then control that can only be traded on their marketplace nobody is going to care and it's just a cash shop with extra steps. I mean, hopefully nobody will care anyway.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Something that only exists as a vehicle for people to scam and cheat money out of others with.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous
      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        is that a fricking leebait image

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        this comic is extremely unrealistic because nobody would every say "I really, really like this image" about an NFT

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          what if it's a NFT of a banana?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      TF2 hats but connected to a blockchain

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      it doesn't matter, they want to use it to make game even less fun and more profitable

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Pay hundreds to thousands of dollars for a receipt (stored on the seller's server) that you own a unique image

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      An NFT is a receipt that shows you purchased a bit of space on a database. You don't own the image that represents it, nor do you actually own that bit of space on the database, you just own the receipt that says you paid for the receipt.
      It's a cash grab from delusional crypto bros and nothing else, and major game devs tried to jump on the bandwagon because they want to milk as much money from consumers as possible. They're only pushed because they can be sold for crypto coins which can be converted to actual money, but the reality is that something like 20% of people who use cryptocoin have NFTs and of that 20%, 3% hold 90% of all value. It's a joke
      Anyone who tries to say "imagine if you bought a skin in X game and transferred it to Y and Z games! NFTs will make that real!" misunderstands what NFTs are on a fundamental level

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >There is a world where DLC could have been represented by NFTs and carry over as content between multiple games (both forward and backwards)
        >Devs could have used this tech to make certain things like eternal new entries into a franchise (I'm imagining something like a new class in a later Disgaea that you can have in every Disgaea both forward and back)
        >Instead it's basically 100% crypto scams by morons who pretend it's anything but just a crypto scam

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          is a world where DLC could have been represented by NFTs and carry over as content between multiple games (both forward and backwards)
          No there isn't because this isn't how game development works

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Skylander and amibo say hi.

            Skylander even have to netf old toy(dlc) because no one buy new one anymore.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >dev makes DLC for one game
          >sells it once
          >has to now make corresponding content for that one game forever for all new games despite no longer making any profit off of it
          this was always a deluded pipedream

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Not to mention it also assumes stupidly like you can just copy code and art assets from one game to another despite them being nothing alike down to how the games were made. As if my ace combat superplane supposed to somehow be usable in elden ring

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              NFTs like that only work in a Metaverse situation like Ready Player One.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          This won't work. The NFT isn't game code. The NFT is just a record of who purchased what, effectively. The developers would need to code an entirely new game and then add to the code "the player who has This NFT gets This reward, etc."

          This isn't really worth the hassle. For one, this has been done long before the internet was even popular. Pokemon is the biggest example. Square even did something similar with Legend of Mana, where it would grab information from one memory card for P2 and put it back when you were done paying. Hell, games like Monster Rancher, Suikoden, Xenosaga, and .hack actually took data from an older game in the series and transferred it to the next game, using memory cards.

          But this method can't add new features to an old game. Not unless the old game is coded to accept those features, and it would mean a HUGE tax to generate a NFT to store a full character model with sprites, especially for a single person. We're talking hundreds of dollars or more per individual one. I don't think you want to buy $800 DLC for your $40 game.

          did you know these games came out last year? they've gone under my radar, not even counting all the remasters

          I might be curious about some of these, but after what Chocobo GP did with its initial launch state, I'm just too pissed at Square to even look at one of their new games. Not to mention worried about how the others turned out.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            I was actually about to get Chocobo GP till I found out about the MtX scam. The in game currency has been made worthless and development has been put on ice. Rumors of EoS already exist, along with no way to get previous content.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Team Fortress 2 already had this idea with cross-game promotional items. Did you want the cool new cosmetics from Poker Night at the Inventory? Then buy the games and beat the challenges.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >There is a world where DLC could have been represented by NFTs and carry over as content between multiple games (both forward and backwards)
          It was already possible to do this without NFTs. It doesn't happen because devs don't want to do it.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Anyone who tries to say "imagine if you bought a skin in X game and transferred it to Y and Z games! NFTs will make that real!" misunderstands what NFTs are on a fundamental level
        They also misunderstand game development. No one would ever build something like this.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It’s a unique digital collectible that has verifiable proof that a) the person who owns it says he owns it and b) it is authentic.

      Kind of like how you take a painting to a guy who says it’s legit, but in this case you know 100% it’s legit instead of needing to trust the guy

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      a scam

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It's a speculative market based on cryptocurrencies that pretends it's offering you something of value, usually a shitty mass produced "art" picture.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It's a unique code that has a file attached to it.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It's like graded game cartridges but for jpegs

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      an nft is basically a digital token containing a link to a jpg

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >I still don't know what an NFT actually is
      In short: It is a scam.

      In more detail: It is a record that you acquired a bit of data, generally just the URL of an image located somewhere on the internet. The record is kept on a bunch of computers across the world, kind of like The Cloud or how a torrent works. So if one copy goes away, the record is still there.

      The exact method involves chaining all the records of every person together (called the blockchain) and making the whole thing publicly available, meaning everybody can fully see the record. It also used encryption technology on your device, normally a phone, to prevent someone from pretending to be you. Of course, this doesn't stop anyone from tricking you into getting your NFT. or stealing your password. or you losing your phone. And there's no way to get your NFT back if it's lost, since the same methods that prevent someone from just taking it from you also prevent someone from taking it from somebody else and giving it to you.

      Also, there's nothing to stop whatever is at that URL from changing. Or no longer hosting the image. Or the server going down. You don't own the image. You don't own the copyright of the image. You don't even own the URL. You "own" the bit of data that mentions the URL in the blockchain.

      Oh, and if buying a bit of text that mentions a URL for thousands of dollars isn't enough of a scam: A lot of these NFT people just take all the money they got and disappear. Meaning that you can't just sell your NFT, you need to find someone with thousands of dollars who wants one. Which is why the "market" around these things crashed.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Imagine making something digital. Like a JPEG or an asset or an audio file, etc. And you could sell the ownership of it. And as proof of ownership, it is linked to some blockchain bullshit. That's NFT.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It was basically a scam for the 1% to get richer. Not joking

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The digital equivalent of autographed trading cards except not even that because a NFT is a hyperlink, not the image itself

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Its literally you paying to get a receipt saying you paid for something. Then you try to trick people into taking your receipts and handing you something else.
      Yes, it is exactly as moronic as it sounds.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Dutch Tulips.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Imagine having a girlfriend but other guys still get to frick her for free

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Little token indicating some piece of code is unique. Associated contracts can point towards files, weblinks, etc, to attach the token to something specific. Normally this is added to a blockchain or record of data and transfers.
      This in effect makes it so that a given image, line of game code, song, most anything, can be given artificial scarcity and can identifiably be transferred between parties and locations.

      How it relates to games is fairly limited.
      Theoretically cosmetics and the like could be transferred between games, but that'd require individual dev teams to have built that functionality in purposefully, and for them to have compatibility checked every potential transfer.
      Generally how it relates to anything is fairly limited because the concept really doesn't apply to much that isn't already effectively handled.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      so

      Little token indicating some piece of code is unique. Associated contracts can point towards files, weblinks, etc, to attach the token to something specific. Normally this is added to a blockchain or record of data and transfers.
      This in effect makes it so that a given image, line of game code, song, most anything, can be given artificial scarcity and can identifiably be transferred between parties and locations.

      How it relates to games is fairly limited.
      Theoretically cosmetics and the like could be transferred between games, but that'd require individual dev teams to have built that functionality in purposefully, and for them to have compatibility checked every potential transfer.
      Generally how it relates to anything is fairly limited because the concept really doesn't apply to much that isn't already effectively handled.

      and all the rest...
      How does NFT improve or help games???

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        it doesn't, you can sell users the idea of a game where they get totally unique items or things worth actual money

        ie life controlling mind controlling shit to make people lose their life on games.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        The idea of a NFT is to have something with you "own" and nobody else can own, which means you can sell it. Nobody else gets to use it unless they own it. So it doesn't help games at all, it just helps provide some sort of potential resale to some aspect of a game.

        Because I'm sure a lot of people would want to buy that +8 armor from the original Diablo these days.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Seems pretty cool to me. A unique item in a ARPG which is actually literally unique.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Well, that's the idea. The actual implementation is that it's a recipt that says how much you paid for the recipt, and a pointer thay points to a publicly accessable file which is in no way protected from copying, altering, or outright deleting, at least not by the NFT part.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >which is in no way protected from copying, altering, or outright deleting, at least not by the NFT part.
              My favorite thing abouf the NFT fad other than "muh #rightclick victim!" was this
              >NFTshills keep arguind and crying that NFTs could help artists protect their works from duplication and retain value for selling
              >A while later
              >artists everywhere start complaining that NFTs are used to profit off their works without their permission
              >artists start issuing DMCA takedowns
              >dozens of nfts become worthless because they're now reduced to links that direct to "This file is unavailable."
              >No refunds lmao
              >NFTards become so upset the never use this shill point again

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Sqeenix, if they planned this out could make it so that you can transfer cosmetics from Final Fantasy to Nier to Dragon Quest. Or have easter eggs where you need to import an item earned in one game to access content in another, a key you find in Nier that you can use to open a door in Final Fantasy. The NFT token being checks to make sure that your key or cosmetic is legit, and to allow for a marketplace where people sell them, probably with Squeenix taking a cut.
        So long as all were built to allow for that, and this was all planned out ahead of time it could be possible. Within single studios exerting executive control and enforcing compatibility across different franchises.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          There's nothing thats been described that couldn't be done with regular ass save files if they really wanted

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Correct.
            The NFTs mainly just add the ability to create an external marketplace for the goods that 'ideally' will be resistant to spoofing or fakes. An attempt to replicate CS:GO or TF2 skins but between franchises with the token mainly existing to hamper injection I suppose.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >that 'ideally' will be resistant to spoofing or fakes
              It would probably do the opposite. Someone would find a bug that allows someone to create smart contracts that grant them something they didn't earn, game can't be patched easily because it needs to maintain support for all prior contracts. Developer winds up having to create a whitelist of allowable objects and allowed trades and synchronise the two making the whole NFT marketplace an unnecessary wart on their in game trading platform.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Pretty likely.
                Smart Contracts are disgustingly abusable and have basically no safety rails built in. And players have every incentive to try to break the system too.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      bro, web 3.0, metaverse, digital trading cards, its the future stop questioning it.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >bro, web 3.0, metaverse, digital trading cards, its the future stop questioning it.

        But now everybody is saying AI chatbots are the future.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Its a receipt that says you own a virtual good. The only real world use case I can think of is reselling software but you run into the issue of "okay you have an NFT that says you bought a game from Steam what happens when Steam shuts their serves off and you can't request to download that game?"

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Official Rare Pepe by Brand™

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      You know what a pointer is in computer programming? An NFT is basically that. It's a pointer, an address. A numeric value that typically encodes the location of something, although the numeric value itself might not actually point to anything valid, and it doesn't control whatever it points at - it's just a value that can be interpreted as an address.

      That's all it is. You don't own whatever it points to. You don't control whatever it points to. You just own - on that particular blockchain - a numeric value which can be interpreted as the address of something.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      an ugly attempt at increasing the value of a crypto token by forcing a purpose onto it (because it previously had none) and then artificially generating hype around that purpose by using buzzphrases like "its decentralized!!" and "make money by playing games!!" and "transfer unique items to other games to use!!"
      Those items will likely only actually transfer to games made by the same company btw. nintendo is not going to implement a moonlight greatsword into a zelda or a fricking mario or whatever, and likewise From isn't going to implement a Hyrulian Master Sword into Dark Souls 6. It's a fricking stupid venture and also the epitome of soulless.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Its like if you really believed Monopoly money was worth the numbers printed on it but on the money was just an image on a computer with a unique ID.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The ultimate form of speculation. You pay money for nothing and hope that there's a bigger fool to buy that nothing from you.
      And a majority of these sales are between different wallets of the same person or between a friend group who are doing it to make it seem as if the specific nothing they're selling is popular and a smart piece of nothing to invest your money into. So when you buy that nothing everybody else interested in buying that nothing disappears.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      You're buying a receipt that says you own a jpg, it only has value because people think it has value and you can't do anything with it other than show it off. I would rather buy a csgo skin tbh

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        incorrect

        it has value because all the receipts are attached to each other and verify each other

        that is where the inherent idea of the value of a blockchain asset comes from, it can be verified to "exist"

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      essentially it's a baseball card

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      monkey jpegs

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      me neither
      i have to write a research proposal or whatever it's called in english for some shit on nfts in libraries, it's due tomorrow
      send help

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Imagine going to the museum, looking at a piece of art you like and buying it.
      ...but you don't actually get to take the picture home with you, you get a receipt saying you own it, and the receipt includes a photocopied picture of the art you like.
      Also, you don't technically "own" the picture, you own an arbitrary amount of currency attached to the picture that goes up and down on a whim, completely out of your control, and at best you maybe own the spot on the wall the art hangs on.
      Also, every time the "picture" is sold, a few acres of a forest somewhere burns down.
      Also, if anything happens to the museum, they sell it, it burns down, it gets new management, someone steals your receipt, etc., you're shit out of luck unless you get super lucky or you're really diligent about paying attention to some of the inner workings on how all this goes.

      Now take all that and just reimagine it as digital instead of physical, so you don't even get the satisfaction of walking to the museum with some buddies and playing pretend you own the art on the wall.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      a receipt

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >go into a supermarket
      >buy 2 steaks, gallon of milk and a pack of cigarettes
      >go to the cashier and pay
      >she gives you a receipt
      >you leave the basket with the goods with the cashier
      >exit the store
      the receipt is the nft
      you can visit the store whenever you want and look at the goods you "own" with that receipt
      next week they replaced all the milk with soimilk, the steak is made out of bugs and your cigarettes are now vape sticks
      you can only view the new goods because the receipt doesnt ensure the original goods stay the same
      a week after the store closes
      you receipt leads you to a 404 page
      thats basically nft
      you may wonder, why do people fall for this?
      because they either dont understand it or understand it and want to scam people

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      You aren't supposed to know. if people knew, they wouldn't waste their money

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      not a .jpg, but a LINK of that image file.
      It's the greatest scam ever

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        The thing about nfts is. Im sure there will be a way they can be implemented in games where people waste tons of money to get exclusive content, like gachas and mmos
        But as it is now, it's a scam.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          There's no good reason to have any such system decentralized, there's not even a good reason for banking to be decentralized.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            I dont like nfts, but i sure think it could work somehow, this is my point.
            There is entire games based on getting special characters or unique outfits/values for those characters

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Yeah it could work it's not difficult to implement either, it's just completely pointless.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                The objective of nfts was never to be useful, just to make money.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      You can just watch the preface to get an idea or watch more.

      If is too long then I would tell you lurk more but you probably lost attention a sentence ago.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It's a link to a jpeg

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      When you buy groceries from the store, you get a receipt for the shit you bought right? Imagine that, but without the groceries

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      a mistake

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      literally paying for a .jpg
      but to confirm that its actually yours and not someone elses you need to spend $600 in electricity costs and server time to verify the bitcoin that's attached to it, to make sure that its yours

      >literally paying for a .jpg
      No, you're paying for a HTTP link stored on the blockchain which might point to a jpg on a centrally controlled server.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      A blockchain receipt for a jpeg of a baseball card.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Put me on the screencap

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It's a scam

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Doomposters always say the same buzz words
    >sunk cost
    The reality is that this is sunk GAIN. In other words, SE and Yoshida will get a massive pay off from NFTs. KYS doomposter

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >SE and Yoshida will get a massive pay off from NFTs

      Oh yeah the same shit thar crashed and burned and barely anyone gives a shit about anymore. Even religious NFT shills have moved on to trying to argue that you own AI art and can get money & reputation from it

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Even religious NFT shills have moved on to trying to argue that you own AI art and can get money & reputation from it
        Unfortunately, you're only half right.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >buzz words
      so bandwagon fallacy to dismiss out of hand. thanks for raging with your illogic early so I knew to avoid reading the rest of your nonsense.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >barry is also a crypto bagholder

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        is also a crypto bagholder

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >caring what that nintenchud has to say

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      u srs?
      he's a halo man

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      why do dudes like this choose to wear such horrid fricking glasses? hes badly balding but other than that he isnt an ugly frick, but his glasses takes him from a solid 7/10 to a 3/0

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >dude, wear black framed onions glasses

        his frames are fine, odd thing to pick out, i'm sure you think plastic onions glasses frames are the only frames

        and he's not a 7 because he has odd features like a high forehead and a Black nose as well as a gay onions beard

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        funny you say that, he recently stopped wearing glasses. must have got contacts or something

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    what the frick went so suddenly wrong with SE?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Suddenly

      Anon they've been doing the most moronic shit for over 2 decades, they literally cannot help themselves.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      SquareSoft merged with Enix, it was all downhill from there

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        OK boomer

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >make shitty action game instead of turn based rpg
          >bro you can't criticize my shitty remake
          tongue anus you low iq mullato mutt.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            The fact this image works every time is why people like him keep posting it.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        It's funny that Dragon Quest is still good but most of the Square stuff is pretty much trash nowadays.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          What, DQ is good but FF is king.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          because it had the holy trio Toriyama/Hori/Sugiyama(rip)

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >hmm should we just release a Classic re-release of our most profitable game we've ever made, that fans are literally begging for?
    >nah
    >frick that
    >lets keep making shitty casual corridor RPGs and dump our profits into a ponzi scheme
    >yeah, that's surely what the fans want

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I'm part of the problem because I buy casual corridor RPGs.
      I'm sorry.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Don't be, they are the only games worth playing anymore.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          oh my

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      you dont actually want a truly classic ffxi server

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I actually do if they update the ui and make menu navigation easier.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      They literally don't have the code. They have explained this. At best they could do something like what ASB is doing where it's all guesstimates from JP blogs and their own testing.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >They literally don't have the code.
        >when neckbeards reverse engineered it for free using just the item and character model assets and nothing else
        lol nah SE are just lazyc**t gay devs like every game dev
        if some fricking fatc**t in a shed can reverse engineer the entire fricking MMO in his free time, a multi BILLION dollar company can throw a few pajeets at it for a month to do the same thing, or better yet, just offer to buy the private server code from DSP

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          a multi MILLION dollar company, now

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      They outsourced a FF XI remake to Nexxon but Nexxon apparently fricked up so it was cancelled.
      Maybe they've restarted it in-house?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        the xi team is still like 3 dudes and a PS2 devkit

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >lets keep making shitty casual corridor RPGs and dump our profits into a ponzi scheme
      That's what FFXIV is and people are still playing that 🙁

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    You can post the article yourself you don't need to shit up the board with your eceleb garbage
    /incel/ when

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      some day...

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Generally think Ganker is far too overmoderated
        >The one thing I want them to clamp down on they ban you for asking them to do something about it.
        I don't even want it to be a banned topic I understand it's something important to zoomers, I just want them contained elsewhere while they do it, just make one eceleb board that covers multiple topics and if it proves too fast split it up a bit more like a Vidya eceleb board and an other eceleb board

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          containment does not work. it legitimizes topics you dont want and creates subcommunities based solely around that topic. /misc/ should have never been legitimized.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          /incel/ would've been a kiwifarms knockoff loaded with gay ops and doxxing. Making a board like that on here would be like making a gamer gate board.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      some day...

      Never, you mongoloids
      It's utterly and fricking useless to ask for a dedicated board if it's not duly enforced that content specifically made for it stays there and doesn't spread elsewhere
      There's a reason why everyone mocks /vmg/ after gacha generals staying around here regardless

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        That's because the mods went full moron and banned generals on /vmg/ so gachaBlack folk laughed at it and continued to shit up /vg/ to this day

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    megalomaniac business visionaries assess the technological landscape and push for experiments in new areas of innovation that could transform games from mere toys into something that matters. seethecels on Ganker unable to cope

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    when is he gonna put his glasses back on

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >falling for a israeli ponzi scheme that everyone else is already wise to

    Why are Japs so sloooooooow?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      That's what happens when you get BTFO by gunboats in the 18th century followed by nukes in the 19th. Whito piggo is so smart and advanced, everything he does must be imitated or you risk getting annihilated.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Damn, the chinks had nukes 100 years earlier?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          thats one way to put it, in about 22 more years at least.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Superior Nipponese business folded 100 times will make it work!

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Isolationism, cultural and language barrier
      watch them heavily inject pozzed shit into their games way after it dies out in the us and europe
      I hope they learn from flopshitten, but they never do

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >after it dies out in the us and europe

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        they wasted a ton of their actual money for toy tokens like every other crypto homosexual, so they're obligated to push it just to see if they can lose as little as possible. they're probably already aware they aren't even getting back 100% let alone more.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      US chuds think Japan is based but in actuality they are like 10 years behind in culture.
      Their games will be as pozzed as current western games in the near future.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I don't wanna end up playing only chinks games, bros...

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >le ponzi
      everything in life is a ponzi, one should benefit from it

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    good, put them in FFXIV so I can finally quit

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    For something collectible to have real value you have to have at least one person out there who wants to buy it and keep it forever and literally every person who buys NFTs is rubbing their hands together fantasizing about how they're going to sell it at a profit someday.

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    did you know these games came out last year? they've gone under my radar, not even counting all the remasters

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I remember seeing threads about Live a Live and Triangle Strategy
      But I never cared about looking into them

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      some of these legit seem like a game you would see inside another game
      fricking VARIOUS DAYLIFE? really?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Why is a company called Square making a game about Triangles that's a completely different shape you fricks.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous
        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >chocoboGP
      lol wut

      Why is a company called Square making a game about Triangles that's a completely different shape you fricks.

      kek

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I Was excited for chobo gp of all fricking things but then I saw it had some atrocious monetization and lost all interest
      could've patched it all out for all I fricking know but the initial sting was enough. I don't play games they design to israelite me on

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        it's insane that a fricking nexon game of all things has less cancerous monetization. also they chose to release their kart racer only for tendies who already have mario kart rather than on ps4 or xbox which do not have a dominant kart racer

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      it's not all kusoge, but certainly Shovel-ware.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Live A Live was my GOTY last year but I'm incredibly biased because the OG was one of my favorite games. Heard Triangle was pretty good, too but never got around to it.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I liked it, just imagine Tactics Ogre LUCT but for children.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      babylons fall was so bad they pulled it from stores within like 6 months. shame I wanted to see just how janky it was for myself.
      triangle strategy, livealive, harvestella and valkyrie elysium are all serviceable, not perfect but fit into a AA kinda space. the rest are 100% trash

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Zamn

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I found out about Paranormasight around 40 minutes ago from someone who likes those kinds of things. Only vaguely remember most of the others though and played the demos for Dio/Valk/Harvestella and none impressed. These mid range game projects need to stop being full retail price though.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >don't do marketing for any of them
      >randomly release them
      >wtf how did they flop?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Marketing the would have cost more than making them.
        They know these are niche games.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          instead they burn 75 million with forspoken instead, brilliant financial decision there Square

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            75 was only for the cost of development, they probably spent another good chunk for marketing, though not as much as FF7R

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >spend 10M making remakes and other AA games
          >lose 9M because nobody bought them
          genious

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >full priced isometric farming RPG w/o voice dubbing
            They are only meant for you, the JRPG nerds.
            If you don't buy them no one else will, no matter how much they shill to "normal gamers."

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              the people who'd buy them don't even know they exist

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Harvestella was shilled here a lot by troons. Other than that, no.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        it was a good game, no troons needed

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I bought Harvestella, it's fun

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I bought valkyrie elysium for 30 bucks and it was still a huge mistake.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I wanted to get Live a Live because I wanted to play it in 1994

      but releasing that game for $40 is emblematic of modern square...insulting at its core. I would've paid $10

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        It's a complete remake with some new content. moron.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          ...and? its a complete remake of a game 4 students can make in 1000 hours today. its not worth 40 dollars lmao

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            also has voice acting
            stop playing dumb

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >muh voice acting
              Dont tell me you're a dubgay on top of this idiocy

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                human workers cost money dimbrain

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                ......still doesnt change the fact that its not worth 40 dollars lmao

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                ...and? voice acting from nobodies isn't remotely expensive. I am an amateur and can out-act countless performances in (especially japanese) games in a multitude of roles, I don't cost anything.

                I understand that you dicksuck square enix because you weren't alive in 1994 and don't understand that square had a period of relevancy that is long over, but the game isn't worth $40. it'd be equivalent to some RPG maker game today, and VA doesn't change that at all

                I actually dont even care for voiced jrpgs, adds nothing to a game like that where im just trying to go through the dialogue as fast as possible

                It's an entirely new game with voice acting, idk what you were expecting.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                lmao square enix dicksucker bought fricking live a live for 40 bucks

                a game youve been able to emulate for 25 years, you bought for 40 bucks

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                a good game, your loss

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                i mean its prob good yeah i wanted to play it frickin nearly 30 years ago

                but its not worth $40

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >30 years ago
                you had all that time to emulate it
                who cares

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                yeah its a who cares situation. i never wanted to emulate it, not into fan translations

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                i mean its prob good yeah i wanted to play it frickin nearly 30 years ago

                but its not worth $40

                It's Switch, just emulated it, the new version I mean.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              ...and? voice acting from nobodies isn't remotely expensive. I am an amateur and can out-act countless performances in (especially japanese) games in a multitude of roles, I don't cost anything.

              I understand that you dicksuck square enix because you weren't alive in 1994 and don't understand that square had a period of relevancy that is long over, but the game isn't worth $40. it'd be equivalent to some RPG maker game today, and VA doesn't change that at all

              I actually dont even care for voiced jrpgs, adds nothing to a game like that where im just trying to go through the dialogue as fast as possible

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      what? are you blind or something? who could forget the instant classics such as
      VARIOUS DAYLIFE
      and
      TRIANGLE STRATEGY
      my guy, you're dead to me if you never played TRIANGLE STRATEGY

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Paranormasight came out 3 days ago and they made literally no effort to advertise it in the west (It was only shown in the japanese nintendo direct).
      Really a shame though, since it's one of their better recent releases.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >since it's one of their better recent releases.

        it's a fricking shovelware VN

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        shit's I've found 5 new games I never heard of before on this thread

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Voice of Card = Yui Ishikawa narrator voice = sex
      Live A Live = great
      Triangle Strategy = masterpiece
      Harvestella = ok
      Diofield = ok

      the rest are trash

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I know all of them.
      >SO
      Good.
      >Both VoC
      Good.
      >DQ Treasure
      Didn't play it.
      >Various Day
      Didn't play it.
      >Diofield
      Erase it from exitence, absolute dogshit.
      >Traingle Strategy
      KINO.
      >Valkyrie Elysium
      Didn't play it.
      >Harvestella
      Mediocre.
      >Babylon's Fall
      Didn't play it.
      >Paranormasight
      Didn't play it.
      >LaL
      KINO.
      >Chocobo GP
      Didn't play it.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Live a live, triangle strategy and octopath are cool, I knew about starocean, diofield valkyrie and babylon fail and maybe I will try diofield someday and star ocean when I will get better graphics card , didn't even knew rest existed

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Dragon Quest Treasures was fun for a bit, mostly due to nostalgia, collecting trophies of various characters, monsters and items from previous games
      but tbh nostalgia is the only thing that game got going for it, neither the treasure hunting nor the combat is anything special

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I had some hope with Chobo GP since I enjoyed the original one but when I heard that it uses currency and shit, it ruined my interests. I hope there's a mod version where all things can be unlocked via gameplay or something and not some currency stuff.
      I'm not expecting something grand, hell I was expecting OK/mediocre at best, but why the hell did they OK'd with the live shop shit? The original series wasn't even that popular.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      if i liked star ocean the last hope would i like the divine force?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Did you generate these with AI?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Nta but do you play smaller games? production-wise
        Or only AAAs?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Mostly shovelware on the switch

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I will wait for a Final Fantasy X Front Mission crossover.
      Because a Wanzer where the pilot can use magic through it and dual-wield gun-blades sounds interesting.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I knew about the LAL, Chocobo racer and Babylon's Fall post release shitshow. Personally i enjoyed this little short game by a Squaresoft copycat

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >SO6
      good
      >Forsaken Maiden
      mid
      >DQ treasures
      good
      >beasts of burden
      mid
      >various daylife
      shit
      >diofield
      good with patches
      >valkyrie elysium
      woke shit
      >triangle strategy
      good vn
      >paranormalsight
      ??
      >harvestella
      mid
      >live a live remake
      good
      >babylon fall
      a flop to rival forespoken
      >choco gp
      never heard of anyone playing it lmao

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Seems like paranormasight is amazing. And chocobo gp is a good game but was killed by bad monetization practices. They at least removed them later.
        Various daylife is just a port of an apple store game

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I only know Babylon's Fall because it was such a flop that everyone was talking about it

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Most Square games just look so generic, there's nothing that makes me want to play them.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        It is just taste. I see Bethesda games and think people need to be kinda moronic to play them, but it is normal.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Square went from producing hit after hit to produce nothing but garbage non-stop.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Live a Live is possibly the only good game there and only because is a remake of a game from before the company went to shit and as is typical of Japanese idiocy they release it exclusively on the system with the lowest potential to sell. Nothing sells on Nintendo systems unless it is made by Nintendo. If is not Mario, Pokemon, Zelda then is not going to sell buddy. It's a waste of time and money.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >If is not Mario, Pokemon, Zelda then is not going to sell buddy. It's a waste of time and money.
        dont forget Monster Hunter
        i really dont know what SE is waiting to make one with DQ or FF ip

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      none of them feature a girl as sexual as riku form x2 so I my interest was not peaked

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    WHAT THE FRICK DID YOU JUST SAY ABOUT THE SWITCH

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    kek

    Jesus Christ.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      PS5 bundles for Xmas!

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    what exactly was the appeal of Forspoken? who were they trying to garner towards? they need to go back to their roots, not making cinematic marvel like trash.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Sony gamers.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      all the MCU-like shit coming out is just looking at the movies at a surface level and thinking the quiprs or big flashy action sequences is what draws an audience and not the decades of buildup and marketing that manipulated people into seeing the new movies on pure association. the movies are basically a massive fricking psyop to garner a loyal recurring audience and literally nothing trying to copy it seems to get that

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Japan did the thing again where they look at what's cool in the west and tries to copy it while missing the mark so it ends up looking more like a parody instead. Usually it's charming but they missed the mark twice this time by copying something nobody likes in the first place. It's not even about Black person characters for me, I'd love to play Final Fantasy: San Andreas. Instead we got more corporate slop

  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Good. NFTs are the future regardless of your luddite predilections.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous
      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        unfortunately that anon is right. unless someone does something about it or society as a whole just stop accepting the illusion fed to them. we truly need a hero to save us.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I predict that electricity will be extinct in 5 years. How's that for luddite? Get fricked.

  17. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I hate NFTgays because they're always so high and mighty about the shit their shilling only to make millions of excuses or just go quiet when their NFT project fails. They constantly talk shit about people who are mildly skeptical and try to bait people into that shit using FOMO strats.
    Who the frick defines the value of the NFT? You can say your shit is worth millions but if no one is willing to buy it, then it's not worth millions.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      A lot of these people are armchair speculators. They watch some youtube videos and assume they know everything. They are 100% optimism and 0% restraint, and have some money to throw around. Or rather, they DID have some money to throw around.

      That's why they shill so hard. The only way they're getting their money back is if they can convince somebody to buy their NFT for the $1000 they spent. The shit's not useful, it's not practical, nobody wants it. But if they can convince somebody to buy it, then they'll make their profit. So they shove all their effort into hyping it up and talking about how much profit it will be worth, and hoping there's a rich sucker out there who hasn't heard the news and will buy it up on their word alone.

      "Always the bigger sucker," as they say.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      NFTgays have to shill. The whole thing is a textbook Ponzi scheme. The only way any money comes in is by finding new marks to scam.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      your reaction is natural because you are dealing with people who want to scam you.
      in real life the proper response would be to beat them up.

  18. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Literally every game with NFTs I have tested has died horribly or will eternally be in "development" as a money stealing scam.
    How doe Square Enix plan to make NFT games viable when no one has?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      You are being too generous in even thinking SE has a
      >plan
      in the first place.

  19. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >NFT BAD!!! BECAUSE J-JPG! MUH LE ENVIRONMENT!!
    >also Ganker
    >OH MY SCIENCE! GENCHINK IMPACT JUST RELEASED A NEW GURRRLL!! WAIFU WAIFU WAIFU!!
    >I-IS THAT ANOTHER SABERFACE!! OH MY BEAST OF CALAMITY!! HAVE TO BUY QUARTZ!!
    >I-IS THAT A HOUSE IN MY FFXIV SERVER!! HAVE TO BUY IT. IS THAT A CAT OUTFIT!! IS THAT A SAAMI OUTFIT!! AAAAAAAGGHH PLEASE FRICK MY butthole YOSHITPISS!!
    Daily reminder that the homosexuals who're blindly seething over NFTs are also twitter gacha homosexuals and xivtroons

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      t. moronic cryptoBlack person desperately trying to get other morons to buy into the newest scam

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >NOOOOO NFTS ARE S-SCAMS BECAUSE T-TWITTER SAID SO!! STOP TRYING TO MAKE MONEY!! T-THAT'S ILLEGAL!!
        >DUUUUUUUDE $20 MOUNT?!! AND IT'S A WHALE??!! BASED YOSHITPISS!! NOW I CAN "OWN" IT!! *until the server closes*
        Go back to your shitty dress sim for trannies xivtroons

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          bump

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >NOOOOO NFTS ARE S-SCAMS BECAUSE T-TWITTER SAID SO!!
          Yeah and? Twitter says to trust snake oil salesmen like Vereecke so I dont. Cry about it.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >capslock
          >a conversation with a person that exists entirely within his own mind
          >crappy effort at a cool kid one liner
          >all to try to try to white knight for NFTs lol
          cringe post
          don't @ me

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >zivtroons have literally no argument to defend their shitty digital dressing sim
            I hope based Kiryu will force yoshitpiss to add NFT housing in XIV. The day your shitty dressing sim MMO close downs will be the day you troons 41% yourself. No matter how hard you pray to yoshitpiss, you will never ever get a refund on your digital skins, mounts or houses.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous
      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        This website is great if you want to have a laugh at failed NFTs and Crypto projects. You will soon find just how often this stuff fails.
        I feel that Bitcoin could be an alternative, but when almost everyone uses it as a speculative asset to make more paper money, they have no real faith in it.
        https://web3isgoinggreat.com/

  20. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    If you actually look at how much money they lost on Flopspoken and FF15 opposed to their value as a company it means absolutely nothing. It's just another thing to say they're doing so that investors continue to be hyped on results which will never come. All of their dividend profit just comes from inflation and the fact the FF brand is so large they could blunder for a decade straight then still turn massive profits. These companies are too big to fail. Too big to fail is the reality we live in and why everything stagnates from the most fundamental financial level

  21. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I just can't see how a blockchain game could be profitable.
    Bitcoin already uses as much power as a mid-sized European nation like Finland. Even if you made the most profitable game on the planet you can't justify server costs like that.
    On the other hand using someone elses blockchain services and tying your game to them is an even worse idea with crypto being a wildly speculative market and also dying at the moment. It's what Ubisoft tried and failed at.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >I just can't see how a blockchain game could be profitable.
      Take a look at how Axie Infinity does it:

      Players buy an Axie for around $350 each.
      However, you need a team of three, so that's over $1000.
      HOWEVER, your stats are randomly generated, so it's really buying three Axie lootboxes.
      You could end up with crap, so you'll generally expect to spend several thousand to start playing.
      You then play the game, PvP style, with the strongest team winning. You can expect to earn around $10 per day.
      OR you could hire some other poor sucker to play your team and earn money for you. This is generally 50/50 profits, so around $5 per day for you.
      Buy up more teams, have more noobs run them, and generate more income.
      Sell all the crap Axis to the new players who haven't figured this all out, and are buying them expecting it to just be Pokemon.

      Of course, the developers of Axie Infinity get money from every one of these exchanges. They get money when they're purchased, they get money when they're sold, they get money when a sucker plays a team for another person, they even get money when anyone cashes out for real world dollars.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        this is called a pyramid scheme

        it's illegal in developed countries

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          everything crypto is just frauds rerunning ancient scams that have been regulated.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous
            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              yeah literally that. anybody couldve picked up a history book on financial scams and made some bank with it. NFTs as an example are what they call a "gold brick scam".
              whats crazy is that morons really fell for it.

  22. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    NFTs are something Japanese investors are excited about which is why they keep mentioning them in these shareholder meetings

  23. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    They won't be doing shit once the president is ousted

  24. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    what's up with the dude in the bottom right?
    looks like FAS or down syndrome

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      he's a game youtuber, ugly, short, talks like a gay, but I think his viewers connect with him as fellow Nintendo autists

  25. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    NFTs are cool if you don't treat them as a speculative market and instead see them as a mechanic to store unique data ownership. MMOs and lobby games with """economies""" should honestly be using them. That way you can trade outside the in-game market too. Also shit is unique and public so you can see what the devs are putting out there, what has been claimed and what hasn't. It's the perfect vehicle for cosmetics whoring and RPchads who want the rarest loot.
    It should never EVER have been treated like bitcoin. It should never EVER been introduced as an alternative to the already fricking shifty modern art hustle.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >MMOs and lobby games with """economies""" should honestly be using them. That way you can trade outside the in-game market too.
      Any participating game would need to be on-board with using the same blockchain and agreeing to honor its owership claims, in which case... you've already agreed to cooperate so why even bother with the blockshit? Just update whatever shared database the participating games are using.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Marketability. Something to put on the box. Also, it mechanically requires, and therefore enforces, certain requirements be met which can make it more appealing. You can replicate all the features someone may wish to have from a chain in-game but you can flub shit and you can simply not have them at all. A standardised mechanic would enforce said practices.
        Hell, if you wished to you could sell multi-series things that can indicate data across multiple databases. Virtual Amiibo effectively. If you're moronic enough to buy Amiibo (and so many evidently are) then NFTs that integrate with games were made for you.
        Ultimately you're right, it's just a novelty.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >Marketability. Something to put on the box.
          "NFT", "blockchain", "crypto", etc drives gamers away, though. We may be dumb but we're nowhere near dumb enough to be drawn in by that shit.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          lol this is literally crypto Black person gibberish.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            I own neither crypros nor NFTs. Why would I waste my money? I'm not a whale. I just don't see it as inherently evil or whatever. It's just a method of registry. It could be made to work in games.

            >MMOs and lobby games with """economies""" should honestly be using them.
            MMOs use something called a "database". ever heard of that? it does what NFT does but better and it doesnt israelite the people either.

            Databases are as israelitey as anything else, brah. Don't know what you're trying to say here.

            >Marketability. Something to put on the box.
            "NFT", "blockchain", "crypto", etc drives gamers away, though. We may be dumb but we're nowhere near dumb enough to be drawn in by that shit.

            I mean that's a fair point but that's only as it currently stands. People don't even blink about always online or whether something is backwards compatible - or will receive long term support
            >whoops your game has been delisted
            No on fricking cares anymore. This too shall pass. I'm not advocating for NFTs but I am saying the outcry seems a touch moronic. If people cared about the state of games they'd be rallying against DRM but instead it's just a fringe group of PC users who give even the slightest frick.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >your game has been delisted
              This pisses me off so much. At least I get to keep the game (for now) but it's so annoying to see a game just... disappear. Live service games reaching end of service isn't great either, but it's something that was obvious once the whole "live service" thing started to extend past MMOs and into games that were never going to sustain themselves for years to come.

              As for crypto/NFTs themselves, everything related to it has been a scam. Everybody advocating for them have been scammers, or brainless hypemongers who think their "investment" will "pay off" once the market goes back to a million dollars for an ape drawing. Every game involving NFTs has been a scam, more of a money making scheme than anything to sit down and enjoy. And asking a big game company or big game franchise to embrace that is just awful for everyone.

              Of course people are going to object to it. But like lootboxes and microtransactions, we'll see if people actually end up accepting it anyway.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >People don't even blink about always online or whether something is backwards compatible - or will receive long term support
              And publishers are careful to avoid bragging about making their games always online or not backwards compatible. They'd want to be quiet about NFTs too. And if they're quiet about it then it's not a marketing point. And if it's not a marketing point then it's a pointless expense vs a conventional database.

              So why do it?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >MMOs and lobby games with """economies""" should honestly be using them. That way you can trade outside the in-game market too.
      Any participating game would need to be on-board with using the same blockchain and agreeing to honor its owership claims, in which case... you've already agreed to cooperate so why even bother with the blockshit? Just update whatever shared database the participating games are using.

      NFTs and blockchains require a huge amount of resources to keep active, far more than just server costs. You can't exactly ask every customer computer to run a mining operation to maintain the blockchain, and if you just put it on a centralized server then there's zero point for it to even be a blockchain.

      There are uses for a blockchain, it's just that none of them involve video games. Or NFTs. Or any of this crypto crap. The only people interested are people currently stuck with worthless crypto/NFTs (probably Square right now) or people who want a get-rich-quick engine to suddenly start working again.

      But you're selling JPG's. Which means that anyone with a screenshot capable device is now able to copy what you have. Items in MMOs work because you can't use that item outside the MMO, to my understanding NFT's are literal pictures that can be used anywhere.

      You're not even selling JPGs. You're selling a bit of data that has a URL leading to a JPG. It's a bit of data that's on a public ledger. A public ledger that literally anybody can read from, at any time. Anybody can just go to the source URL and grab the image just by looking at the blockchain.

      It's possible to put a JPG on the blockchain ledger, but it's also still possible for anyone to get the JPG directly because it's all publicly available.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >MMOs and lobby games with """economies""" should honestly be using them.
      MMOs use something called a "database". ever heard of that? it does what NFT does but better and it doesnt israelite the people either.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      You don't need NFTs to do that in a MMO you moron. Unique/Primary Keys are a basic function that is automatically enforced.

      Any MMO with a database could ensure and enforce that there's only ever X of a resource in an economy.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Videogames and MMOs, a world where you don't own anything, but are being given a temporary license that can be revoked at any moment for any reason................

      and you guys expect a company to give you something that is only yours forever and that works on other markets/IPs?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >That way you can trade outside the in-game market too.
      Why would I want that? Isn't that literally inviting RMT into your game? In game market places are fine, having to go through fricking discord groups (because you know that is how that will go down) to trade shit sounds awful.

      Honestly, I never understood the buzz around the NFTs, even removed from the apes. Yes, I own something in a blockchain, yes it is secure, but to me as regular enduser it makes 0 difference to a normal database that has an entry stating "x owns this". And can't NFT even be stolen? I sometimes read about some idiot having his ape stolen, so what is even the point if someone can take it away? A normal contract just says "Anon owes this" no matter who holds the paper.

  26. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Why do I need the blockchain when Steam Marketplace has done functionally the same thing for decades?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Because Square doesn't get any cut from Steam.

  27. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Imagine the cheating when you can drop real cash money from bosses

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I think some Dr Disrespect or some other big streamer has been funding the development of an NFT based Escape From Tarkov clone so the cheating scene in that outta be pretty insane

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Lmao yes

        I love how he just doesn't realise how this would get ruined by cheaters instantly

        Gaming already has issues with cheats in competetive multiplayer games, now imagine adding monetary gain to the mix

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          how to get black and hispanic kids killing each other irl for literal video game items

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            wasn't there a brazilian kid that killed and fricking raped another kid because of some stupid game like gaia or something
            I think he killed him over some items, fricking dismembered him, too

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >open a locker
          >Ultra Omega Super AK with the limited edition radioactive banana paint scheme worth 100k
          >grab it and run
          >your hands are shaking
          >you're sweating so hard you've soaked through all your clothes
          >you can see the exit
          >it's so close
          >you've almost made it
          >elation is rising in your chest
          >get zapped by an aimbotter through a bangable wall and three layers of foliage six feet from the exit
          >hacker now gets to live like a king in his third world country

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            It's okay, that aimbot was a NFT that I minted and sold to them. So it's all valid gameplay.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >game is actually a meta game about securing victory through exploits and injects without getting booted by server
            >arms race to become the most OP and secure the dosh without tripping whatever anti-cheat heuristics exist
            >open secret between devs and players
            >different maps/servers have better loot but subsequently better systems and more intrusive software to run
            Sounds kinda based. I'd watch some hour long long-form on some player getting a big win and explaining hte autism required to do it. It would be like a live and competitive TAS comp.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              So an average e-sport career but they hide it even less?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Nah. I doubt e-sportsgays know how to code, though maybe they'd still be neccesary in some ways to have a 'human element' and not get kicked. I'd imagine the real 'competition' would be between cheat manufacturers. Think of it like professional motor sports but with even less need for a driver.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                But that's what e-sport already is, of course the players barely know what their cheat actually does beyond aim_at_head, but there's some competition between cheat manufacturers.
                That being said, what you're offering would basically be a big HvH game with restriction that you have to be the one who makes the cheat you're using. I doubt there's enough people interested in that sort of thing to make it profitable. Would be kino to watch though.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Just let people cheat openly so long as the in-game heuristic doesn't snipe them. I'm not saying coders have to play, but if you're good enough why bother giving it to e-sports players to profit off. If it 'helps' you win you could get a stable of 'players' in the same way there's a stable of drivers with shared profits/loot. So rather than 'Team moron' you'd have whomever is making the mods or the mod name and the people playing under him. All the devs need to do is say they only ban players based on their in-game program and don't care about external, and now all the more falsifiable, evidence.
                Take the shit happening in the shadows of e-sports into the spotlight and kick the egotistical monkey's that just click when they see the right colours and shapes - or at least minimise them somewhat.
                Seeing the weird shit TASgays get up to I could just imagine how broken a game could get if you were all but encouraged to cheat as hard as possible.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Don't get me wrong, I'm with you. I already used to watch some HvH content or how cheats work and it's way more interesting than people give it credit for. I'm just saying there will never be big enough audience for this kind of shit to make it worth. Unless you can get e-sport level prize pools then the people who are dedicated to e-sport teams won't switch. Regular cheat makers would also have to be convinced to swap since there'd have to be playerbase big enough to justify losing all the money from their CS/Overwatch/Apex/whatever cheat subscriptions they're making at the moment. That basically leaves only regular players who have even less of an idea about coding than e-sportgays, so at this point instead of allowing cheats you'd have to make cheating an in-game mechanic.
                There's also the fact normalgays are moronic and still deny that cheating is massive in every competetive shooter and especially pro player scenes for those and would cry that this is normalizing cheaters in games.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >there will never be big enough audience for this kind of shit to make it worth
                People do it for free, both cheat manufacturers and TASgays. It's not a viable idea but if it were to ever exist it'd be niche as frick - and that's a good thing.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >that pic
          >"This new thing is so exciting! Just"
          >"The skeptics and detractors are fighting against the future!"
          Goddamn, every shill for these scams (crypto, NFTs, and AI) all talk the *exact* same way. They give the same vague scenarios and use the same "you're fighting against the future if you're against this" defensiveness. These people are too lazy to be productive and they're too lazy to change their marketing scripts.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Don't forget the chinkbotting. It's already bad enough in games where RMT is banned, imagine how worse it'll be in games where RMT is the entire fricking point.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Imagine a job with no contract,leave days, sick days, healthcare coverage,union,with a bar of entry so low that billions of people can do it and you compete against everyone,including those who can cheat.

  28. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    its depressing to know that my xiv sub money goes to this
    just let some other company buy FF and yoshida's team please

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      what value does FF have? in what way is it not exhausted/used up

      honest question

      tired of seeing this zombie of a company shamble around using a name that became meaningless 20 years ago, dont get why young people are so attached to FF when it was never meaningful in their time

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        anime aesthetics is eternal, for every years millions of kids turn 13

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          anime aesthetics are not reliant on fricking F F

          wasn't there a brazilian kid that killed and fricking raped another kid because of some stupid game like gaia or something
          I think he killed him over some items, fricking dismembered him, too

          has happened multiple times around several games, mostly shooters, just ppl mad that they lost or whatever. dunno the case youre talking about

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            FF sells itself on it, and has been defied by it since the 90's

  29. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Reminder that the report dates from a month before Luminous was closed and Matsuda fired.
    That said, the new CEO doesn't seem a hair better, unless he's just been yes-manning Matsuda for the past 3 years and will radically change course when actually taking charge in May.

    If not, once symbiogenesis is a massive dud we can see another CEO change next year.
    https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ZJmAPX5q3Al9dt6d-wsAFaKDX5JjSZl1/view

  30. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    NFTs just remind me of stuff like Neopets.

  31. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    NFTs remind me of those Korean MMO webtoons where in-game items can somehow be sold for real money and the protagonist becomes super rich by poopsocking in a video game

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      thats been done in diablo3. you dont need NFTs for that.
      its really gay.

  32. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >multi-platform strategy
    Of making all your AAA games Playstation console exclusive and wondering why they aren't selling as well as you thought they would?

  33. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    NFT crypto bros...

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >selling shit that isn't real is not a great business plan when people are hurting more financially than they have since the 1970s

      whoaaa

      what if we
      hol up what if we
      *smoke flies back into blunt*
      *blunt unburns itself and becomes whole*
      sold real things

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Whenever a bank fails its owners should be publicly beheaded to set an example

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        That just encourages more shady and corrupt actions

  34. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >SE released a new VN game
    >unvoiced
    how? they're BILLION DOLLAR COMPANY how are they unable to afford voice acting? what even is the point?

  35. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The best part that shows how worthless and purely speculative NFTs are is how it's not even image, it's not even link - it's POINTER to link. If somebody delete said link, all these idiots are trying to sell is pointer to nothing.

    Also, look how after cryptoshit failed and NFTs are pretty much dead, some groups try to convince everyone that AI is next big thing and you absolutely need to buy GPUs en masses to provide it with proper computional power. In the end, it's all about fricking up normal customers in the ass with artificial scarcity.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >The best part that shows how worthless and purely speculative NFTs are is how it's not even image, it's not even link - it's POINTER to link. If somebody delete said link, all these idiots are trying to sell is pointer to nothing.

      you showed that you have zero understanding of this whatsoever...it's already been explained in the thread for people like you that the point of blockchain technologies is that you can't delete it

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        And do you? Blockchain don't contain links or images themselves - they are too big for that. All it contains are pointers.

        Blockchain technology is biggest scam ever and nothing will change that.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          your problem is with the entities employing the technology not the technology

          you don't disavow banks because they could magically disappear your account

          the idea is that they don't..so no you can't trust fricking.. dr disrespect..but what if a trustworthy entity employs this technology

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >trustworthy entity
            Any example?

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              no lol

              [...]
              It's Switch, just emulated it, the new version I mean.

              >use my computer to emulate the switch remake of a game i never emulated the SNES version of on PC because it'd have been fan translated since I didn't get to play it in 1994 because Square couldn't afford to port it

              No thanks

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            kys crypto schizo

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Nft is just a proof of ownership on an immutable digital ledger, it was hijacked by moronic greedy Americans and turned into garbage.

  36. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I'm waiting until Matsuda is actually out and the new CEO takes charge before making any calls.

  37. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Is there any real practical use in turning digital data into something "non-fungible"?
    Maybe for security or something it should make some sense, but why make a digital "product" non-fungible? If something is easily replicable, isn't it better to leave it that way? Imagine someone discovers the secret of Jesus to make food non-fungible for example, why would anyone want to do the opposite process instead of taking advantage of the infinite replication of something?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Basically it's so that digital data can be treated the same way as real world objects, that NFT can be proven to have ownership through the blockchain.

      That being said, NFTs are not what people think it is, the blockchain is too small to store images so all it really has is a link to the image, so people don't own an image that's associated with the NFT, only the NFT itself which is just a line of URL stored in the blockchain.

  38. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Honestly this is just moving in the wrong direction. Digital ownership shouldn't be a thing at all. Just copy shit

  39. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I have yet seen a reason why NFTs are inherently better than something like CS:GO skins other than DA BLOCKCHIAN!!!1!

  40. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >imagine getting paid for just reading

    the absolute state of youtubers

  41. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Since when are we listening to George Floyd worshipping, cow marrying cucks like NintendoWave?

  42. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    No they aren't. Its a hustle.

    See the japanese gubment is trying to bruteforce metashit hard. Part of this is offering tax break and kickback incentives to any companies pledging to contribute to this.

    So naturally Square keeps going "mhmm, yep, nfts, metaverse, we are jumping in real soon" and has been doing this for 2 years.

    Why do you think they suddenly have so many AA games coming out at once?

    Because they are promising nfts they dont have to deliver on and getting massive kicbacks for flops just for promising.

    The moment leadership changes in japan and the metaverse shit is dropped watch them never mention it again. Its just square enix being square enix.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The nft is just an excuse to get tax breaks because the japanese government is funding it. I always believed how weird it was that Matsuda is talking about nfts for more than 2 years and no one saw a real project around it.

      He will just release a 10 dollar scam mobile game and call it a day

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Its the same reason Uwe Boll made all those dogshit films in bumfrick nowhere germany and in the 2000's all hollywood productions were filmed in ontario. Grifters gonna grift.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          I think the fact they have self awareness to not make a nft FF game and are just using this to get advantage is better. The only thing i truly dont understand is why Matsuda felt compelled to shill nfts in every public letter he made. Why

  43. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    do they still believe amerimutt Black folk meme. they are dumb as hell.

  44. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >meanwhile their best-looking game in 20 years is going to fail because of platform exclusivity.

    At least we'll get one more good game out of them before they crash it seems.

  45. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    "Hmm, should I go onto the website itself to get a screen cap to better illustrate what my post is about?" Anon asked himself, stroking his third chin, his fingers greasy from his 32nd hot pocket today. He then shook his head as he paused the Youtube video of a Basedjak in real life spoon feeding his beyond rotten brain the information as he is incapable of reading it himself. "Nah, this is good enough." He says as he screen caps the entire screen and rushes over to Ganker to tell the others the big news.

  46. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Shit will bomb harder than Balan and forspoken. Just start selling porn of your characters if you want money.

  47. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I think it's some Sony buy Square and fire all the morons in the company.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      *time

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Man you sure want Sony buying SE so much lol

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        The recent situation is funny

        Sonygays afraid of the whole acquisition thing so they want Sony buying SE
        Tendies also scared so they larp possibilities like Nintendo getting the rights of specific IPs

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Yea. SIE cant afford anyone else getting them. SIE also needs some more Japanese developers. They have enough Western ones. After they buy SE and maybe 1 or 2 more they need to start making new Japanese studios and invest in new IPs.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Sony literally doesnt have enough money to buy them, even more in a scenario where SE is getting bigger with profits since 2014. There is also no reason for SE to sell itself to Sony right now. They make business deals with all the companies, like exclusive Team Asano games with Nintendo.

          And SE literally said last year they arent selling the company, at most shares of some IPs, which i would bet on shit like Just Cause.
          You might think SE is in a bad position but if you put in perspective how they are doing, they are at their best moment since the early 2000s

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Sony Group definitely has the money to buy them. They've got like 1 trillion yen. Sony might buy stakes into the various studios before that tho.
            >There is also no reason for SE to sell itself to Sony right now
            Maybe not right now. But if Sony offers a a price it would probably happen. Especially if the new CEO ends up doing dumb shit that costs SE loads.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              I said a lot of things and your only argument was "i still think they can do it"
              So seems more like your wishful thinking. Whatever tho.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >think
                I know they can. Sony Group can buy SE if they want. Money ain't an issue here. It's if SE is willing.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I said 2 replies ago how they dont want it and said that in official reports. Bro...

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                LET ME HAVE MY HOPIUMMMM AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Jim Ryan also doest care about japanese games, there is a reason why the only thing Sony is promoting are games like FF, because they have global appeal and break the niche jrpg demographic.
            They will never promote games like Live a Live

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              I really wonder how the share of SE games will go when the Switch 2 is a new console and not a toaster.
              I can see the only SE games being focused on PS being the big ones like FF and KH, because they push graphics

  48. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Enables your company

  49. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Squeenix keeps talking about NFT shit but its been years and they still haven't released anything related to it
    Konami went all in and it didn't take them long to shit out some castlevania NFTs or whatever the frick that was
    Really seems like its just some moronic talking point for shareholders

  50. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    relational databases made NFTs obsolete in games 40 years ago

  51. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    What did OP mean by this?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >SWM
      Snoy Woke Movies?

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *