really cool games, both did a great job of telling a story without words, Limbo is pretty straightforward but I still wonder what Inside is really about
Great games, but I don't think they are for everyone. 99% of the story is told through ambiance and clues in the course of the game. This is why Joseph Anderson got filtered
Inside was okay in a "I'm mildly curious what new thing will happen next" way. I wouldn't play it again and I wouldn't buy it for more than 10 dollars.
Limbo was alright but Inside was beautiful and gameplay wise is just and upgraded Limbo.
They're both good but Inside improves upon every single element in Limbo.
Both are decent but Inside kind of goes off the deep end in the latter half and doesn't bother explaining itself which is pretty lame. If you take the platforming and puzzles out and replace them with shallow combat then you get Trek to Yomi and I enjoyed that a bit more than both of them.
Can't speak for Inside. These cinematic platformers tend to bore me, shallow games pretending to be deep
really cool games, both did a great job of telling a story without words, Limbo is pretty straightforward but I still wonder what Inside is really about
They are overrated, and that's their main quality.
They're actually underrated.
elaborate
>overrated
Actual meaningless term. Name a game and some Ganker user will say it's overrated, and he'll repeat it without substance for hours.
I wish more devs would try to make horror platformers like these instead of shitty unity first person asset flips.
I really enjoyed Inside.
The third game is going to be EGS exclusive unfortunately.
Not timed either.
how easy/quick are these games to platinum?
Get a different hobby. I don't want you shitting up mine even further.
Both quick and easy. Probably around 4 hours for each game. Limbo is a bit longer than Inside but not by much.
cool, they're both included with ps plus ill get the plats
Not as easy as platinuming suicide.
Limbo was an actual game. Inside is a movie with some puzzles in it.
Great games, but I don't think they are for everyone. 99% of the story is told through ambiance and clues in the course of the game. This is why Joseph Anderson got filtered
>Joseph Anderson got filtered
This is honestly one of the biggest endorsements that a game can receive.
Inside was okay in a "I'm mildly curious what new thing will happen next" way. I wouldn't play it again and I wouldn't buy it for more than 10 dollars.
Limbo was alright but Inside was beautiful and gameplay wise is just and upgraded Limbo.
They're both good but Inside improves upon every single element in Limbo.
Is there a name for this genre of games? I enjoy them both, and enjoyed Little Nightmares, and I want to play more.
Cinematic platformer. Check out Abe's Odyssey.
Thanks, I will check it out. I'll have to look into Cinematic platformers because they are fun.
They're what artsy fartsy type games should be: short and to the point.
I liked them but can't really imagine replaying them.
completely empty meaningless shit cloaked in the aesthetics of "art". only people with sub 110 IQs are impressed by this trash
>only people with sub 110 IQs are impressed by this trash
It's the exact opposite.
I love atmospheric games like that and little nightmares and shit. Give me more
Northern Journey and Infra
Thanks M8. Especially infra looks cool
It's great especially if you like atmosphere in your games.
Linear movie game rubbish.
I liked the mermaids
First half of limbo was scary. turned to shit when you enter the industrial area
Both are decent but Inside kind of goes off the deep end in the latter half and doesn't bother explaining itself which is pretty lame. If you take the platforming and puzzles out and replace them with shallow combat then you get Trek to Yomi and I enjoyed that a bit more than both of them.