What do you guys think about the speed of a shooter? IS slower "better"?

What do you guys think about the speed of a shooter? IS slower "better"?

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    No, and you're a fag, bro. I like hearing metal riffs while flying through the air. have a nice day.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >while flying through the air
      >post Duke where you dont fly through the air

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >steroid Duke is one of the fastest fps protags
        >can traverse levels incredibly quickly
        >literally has a fucking jetpack
        Have you never played Duke3D anon?

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          This is considered fast for you?

          ?si=4koi7UhpdjrhJUF2

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >post gameplay from an inexperienced player
            >see it's slow!

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Let me guess, experienced players like yourself play on sourceports right?

              You didn't play the game, he played it on hardware it was designed for on software (DOS) it was designed for. You are a secondary.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >but what if I went slow on purpose!?
            Dukebros...we fucking lost...

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Thats how the game naturally moves, I bet you first played Duke 3D in the late 2000s/early 2010s. Your opinion is WORTHLESS secondary

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You were too poor to upgrade from a 2 year old piece of shit? That sucks, but people who weren't poor had enough money for something better.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Stop pretending like you were even conscious in the 90s, just your reaction to actual duke 3D gameplay from 90s tech shows you never saw it before and you played it on a source port

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Ok poorfag, whatever you say.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Wow you're so cool and totally not a fatass.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      fp is of course bp

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Which game would be considered slow, medium and fast?
    >slow: max payne, tomb raider
    >medium: half life, quake
    >fast: doom

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Quake is literally identical to Doom. You don’t fit in.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I played and beaten both. Quake feels slower than doom to me. I don't know what else to tell you.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >You don’t fit in.
        I do.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >fast: doom
      lol delusional boomer

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >glory kills
        >fast
        lfuckingmao

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          faster than anything in OG DOOM, and chainsaw is a glorykill in OG DOOM as it locks onto enemies once close enough

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            And barely anyone uses the chainsaw.
            Meanwhile in Nu-doom you MUST do the glory kills because the enemies are literal piñatas and you can't get ammo and health otherwise

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Can you stop shilling your channel?

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You had this thread less than an hour ago.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Wojaks on thumbnail
      Subhuman take.

      Speaking of: What was up with those previous threads that were being spammed and the Mods just not autosaging or deleting the threads? I got clocked for announcing Sage in one while they continued their pointless battle against the spammers.

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It depends what you mean by fast
    If it's doom/quake fast, it's perfectly fine
    If it's zoomers/streamers breaking the game with slide cancelling and other cringy ass exploits and demanding it becomes the standard for every shooter then it can fuck off

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >exploits

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        unintended movement that gives an advantage is by definition exploiting a fault in the game, yes

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          By this logic any "unintended" ways to play the game that develops past release of the game is an exploitation. Just admit that you're bad at the games you play and you never took the 10 minutes it takes to be able to learn and improve. Thousands of others have and they are better players because of it. Its not like the tech is hard to learn anyways. Imagine coping about mechanics that give your game depth and instead of mastering it you decided to cry about it, kek.

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Movement tech is king. One half the fun of FPS games is the movement. We have all played basic wasd movement and its boring. Give me bhop, strafe jumping, slide hopping, tap strafing, wall running, grappling, dashing etc.

    There is no feeling quite like bhoping around the map at high speeds direct hitting your opponent with rockets.

  7. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Titanfall was fun

  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    If the game is good and fun to play I don't care about speed. I like Quake, I like Halo CE, simple as

  9. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Oh boy are we gonna have another wojakpocalypse raid thread like last day? It was fun. Please follow my advice and replace 'jak with my beloved fluffboy.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      loona and stolas are better

  10. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It's not as much about top speed as it is movement options and player friction. All those things are tools for the player to master as much as the actual arsenal of guns themselves.

  11. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    No, but slow can be good. Its just harder to make good because part of the fun in games is being forced to make decisions quickly, and in slow FPS games the decisions to be made are not engaging enough for the time given to make them. Serious Sam is a "slow" FPS compared to the fastest in the genre, but you make long term (long term for fps standards) choices as you see mobs spawning in the distance and gather time to pick what ammo to use, or who to target first.

    Still, I think faster gameplay suits fps games more than slower, simply because the genre doesn't have many ways to make longer term strategy a real thing beyond conserving ammo I guess, which is uninteresting and rather brainless most of the time.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Actually going to reply to myself here and say that actually Devil Daggers is one of the few FPS games with longer term planning due to being able to control spawns. However the game is so fucking hard that you usually make the decisions before you press play and set yourself timers for when you should or shouldn't do things. Still, when things go wrong and out of plan, you have to decide for yourself in that moment what you should do to survive in the future of that run.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      you have horrid taste

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        And why is that?

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >anything with actual atmosphere and strategy required in unplayable or barely playable
          >doom eternal as the best FPS of all time
          >ultrakill (chud adhd game) right behind it
          if your tierlist is bait its fucking perfect at its job

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      agree on serious sam but desync is gay as shit

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Wait you played Desync but didn't like it? Wierd, never met someone who actually didn't like it, only that no one else played it. What did you think was wrong about it? For me the only part I thought was a bit mean was that environmental hazards are an instant ONKO for the player.

  12. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Wojaks on thumbnail
    Subhuman take.

  13. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >4.6k views
    We get it, your channel is dying. You've posted this exact thread twice today.

  14. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Stop trying to shill your youtube channel here ya big palooka.

  15. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    buy an ad

  16. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  17. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I think a wojak thumbnail earns an automatic "Don't recommend channel".

  18. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I agree that slow shooters are better. But halo is still shit. Gore Ultimate soldier is the best Multiplayer FPS ever. Time Splitters is pretty good too.

  19. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    gemmy

  20. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    If slow shooters were better then counter strike would be the best shooter, but since it's shit and Quake rules I'm driven to think that OP has shit tastes

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >then counter strike would be the best shoote
      But it is thats why it has 100000x more players than Quake

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Bruh, they're all russian. Each of them counts as 0.000001 humans.

  21. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    @650557538
    So you are just going to keep repeating yourself until the other person stops replying so you can convince yourself that you won the argument, lol I remember doing this when I was 8 years old

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *