gun dilator
FTM guns naturally don't have triggers. so when they install the trigger, the gun needs to insert a dilator in regular intervals until it get's decommissioned or else the trigger falls off
If full auto is moronic why the frick do gun manufacturers still keep adding it? There is no gun in the world that NEEDS to be fired at full auto. Just make more competition triggers and let the person wielding the firearm work for the faster fire rate.
>If full auto is moronic why the frick do gun manufacturers still keep adding it? There is no gun in the world that NEEDS to be fired at full auto.
it has practical uses >Just make more competition triggers and let the person wielding the firearm work for the faster fire rate.
Trigger upgrades are alot more expensive then adding a disconnector to a fire control group
like suppressing a target
or if you watch any amount of CQB footage just how useful dumping half a mag into a target at 15 yards can be.
No guns and Bench rest tards shit on full auto for being a waste of ammo because engaging a target at 100 yards plus in full auto is usually not very effective but they forget that the average infantryman has something like a 10% or less percentage for landing shots on target and not everything in a firefight is about landing accurate shots. There are things like supporting fire, bounding fire and sometimes you just want to keep peoples heads down.
>homosexual pops up head from behind cover >spray at him >homosexual takes cover >homosexual can't see squadmate chucking a pineapple at him
you're gonna miss every shot you don't take, so make sure you shoot as much as you can. GET FULL AUTO.
Full auto is useful to put more bullets down range and thus increase the chance that at least one of them will strike their target. Untrained use will likely waste ammunition too quickly to be a practical benefit, although if you really, really have to put holes in a single target, then it's still a benefit. There's also the logistical issue of burning through ammo too fast resulting in a lot of waste of materiel.
In short, modern militaries see benefits from it because they'd rather increase combat effectiveness at the cost of extra munitions being wasted because for the most part no one's worried about running out of ammo anymore, everyone else would probably be better off with semi-automatics instead outside of very close quarters combat. There was a US general who recently wrote a book about things like that (It was basically a cope on why Afghanistan went the way it did, but one of the reoccurring themes was the tradeoff between efficiency and effectiveness which had a lot of good advice in it), I didn't remember to bookmark it but if you're interested, search it up.
No. It is just a little plastic flap that sits flush with the trigger just by putting your finger on it. Trigger safeties are moronic, but for other reasons.
The "trigger" is the middle red piece. The black part on the outside can't be pulled down unless the middle piece is also being squeezed. It's for morons with bad trigger discipline
Is it so it doesn't go off in your pocket or something?
https://streamable.com/ddgh6w Here
https://i.imgur.com/AOLqW6h.jpg
What does the red thingy on the trigger do?
Striker fired guns usually don't have a manual safety so a trigger safety prevents the gun from firing unless the tab in the center is also pulled during the trigger pull
most guns with trigger safeties don't have manual safeties and honestly don't need them. Trigger safeties are fine if you are not a smooth brain.
i still dont understand
wouldnt an internal lock of some sort be way safer than sticking a piece of thin metal between the trigger?
its faster and easier to just use a trigger safety and realistically if you are carry the gun hot and ready it should be a in a holster and you have nothing to worry about.
As many people have mentioned, it’s a trigger safety. It’s supposed to prevent the trigger from being unintentionally depressed when it’s in a holster. It also functions as a drop safety, as some guns (notable with Sigs) when dropped, the momentum of drop can actually transfer to the trigger and it depresses itself. This is less likely with a trigger safety.
Safety
trigger safety
It’s a safety
Shoots harder
Sounds like the lube I keep in my drawer.
>lube
American moment.
Rentfreer moment.
mustard gas release
Brown people deterrent.
Activates the squirt function just to scare people.
activates incendiary rounds
red = hot
mechanical safety keeping the trigger from fully being pulled/going back any other way unless it's pressed back (by your finger)
>by your finger
gun dilator
FTM guns naturally don't have triggers. so when they install the trigger, the gun needs to insert a dilator in regular intervals until it get's decommissioned or else the trigger falls off
Why's it got a USB slot?
Firmware updates.
Pretty sure that's supposed to be the safety.
Slide lock release
To load mp3s. Headphone jack is at bottom of grip
troubleshooting updates
You plug your headphones in and nobody but the shooter hears the gunshots
It's how you select between lethal, and non lethal rounds.
i'm going full moron
If full auto is moronic why the frick do gun manufacturers still keep adding it? There is no gun in the world that NEEDS to be fired at full auto. Just make more competition triggers and let the person wielding the firearm work for the faster fire rate.
>If full auto is moronic why the frick do gun manufacturers still keep adding it? There is no gun in the world that NEEDS to be fired at full auto.
it has practical uses
>Just make more competition triggers and let the person wielding the firearm work for the faster fire rate.
Trigger upgrades are alot more expensive then adding a disconnector to a fire control group
>has practical uses
Like?
Shootin fasta ya git
like suppressing a target
or if you watch any amount of CQB footage just how useful dumping half a mag into a target at 15 yards can be.
No guns and Bench rest tards shit on full auto for being a waste of ammo because engaging a target at 100 yards plus in full auto is usually not very effective but they forget that the average infantryman has something like a 10% or less percentage for landing shots on target and not everything in a firefight is about landing accurate shots. There are things like supporting fire, bounding fire and sometimes you just want to keep peoples heads down.
israeli clearing a bunker's aperture
>homosexual pops up head from behind cover
>spray at him
>homosexual takes cover
>homosexual can't see squadmate chucking a pineapple at him
you're gonna miss every shot you don't take, so make sure you shoot as much as you can. GET FULL AUTO.
Why stop at full auto when you can go fuller auto?
>If full auto is moronic
It's not
Full auto is useful to put more bullets down range and thus increase the chance that at least one of them will strike their target. Untrained use will likely waste ammunition too quickly to be a practical benefit, although if you really, really have to put holes in a single target, then it's still a benefit. There's also the logistical issue of burning through ammo too fast resulting in a lot of waste of materiel.
In short, modern militaries see benefits from it because they'd rather increase combat effectiveness at the cost of extra munitions being wasted because for the most part no one's worried about running out of ammo anymore, everyone else would probably be better off with semi-automatics instead outside of very close quarters combat. There was a US general who recently wrote a book about things like that (It was basically a cope on why Afghanistan went the way it did, but one of the reoccurring themes was the tradeoff between efficiency and effectiveness which had a lot of good advice in it), I didn't remember to bookmark it but if you're interested, search it up.
suppression
it's for shooting toy darts instead
https://streamable.com/ddgh6w Here
So you need to press hard to shoot? That's dumb.
no one cares about your opinion, liberal
No. It is just a little plastic flap that sits flush with the trigger just by putting your finger on it. Trigger safeties are moronic, but for other reasons.
The "trigger" is the middle red piece. The black part on the outside can't be pulled down unless the middle piece is also being squeezed. It's for morons with bad trigger discipline
Striker fired guns usually don't have a manual safety so a trigger safety prevents the gun from firing unless the tab in the center is also pulled during the trigger pull
Is it so it doesn't go off in your pocket or something?
i still dont understand
wouldnt an internal lock of some sort be way safer than sticking a piece of thin metal between the trigger?
there's also a lock on the side of the gun. it's an additional safety mecanic.
most guns with trigger safeties don't have manual safeties and honestly don't need them. Trigger safeties are fine if you are not a smooth brain.
its faster and easier to just use a trigger safety and realistically if you are carry the gun hot and ready it should be a in a holster and you have nothing to worry about.
Clipazine release
game?
It's a call of duty game. Don't know which one specifically though.
One of the original Modern Warfare games or BlackOps i think.
It triggers the trigger so it can trigger the trigger.
As many people have mentioned, it’s a trigger safety. It’s supposed to prevent the trigger from being unintentionally depressed when it’s in a holster. It also functions as a drop safety, as some guns (notable with Sigs) when dropped, the momentum of drop can actually transfer to the trigger and it depresses itself. This is less likely with a trigger safety.
This. Striker fired pistols have this issue. Hammer (single/double) action pistols are safe by default as long as the hammer isn't wienered.
wumbo mode
>he uses a safety