>what opposing viewpoints in retro do you respect
What two things clashing to you think is entertaining, honest writing, or is it what do you politically agree with on ur own person gay compass >Where do you draw the line
Draw the line on what, we are describing an dichotomy, how the frick is there too much or two little dichotomy, it's always a portion of the whole.
So are you asking which "gay" elements in retro games you accept and which you don't? This is hard, you're speaking strangely what is your native language?
One can respect something without subscribing to or actively endorsing its validity or intrinsic worth; I assume the poster in question means that he acknowledges the position, while disagreeing with it for being limiting and arbitrary, and does not seek to infringe on or contest the rules as they have been established.
I'll try, but you might not be able to grasp the concepts. A long time ago in a world far, far less woke, people tolerated, and even respected the beliefs and opinions of people who hadn't been programmed to think exactly how they had. Many even respected and obeyed the rules, even if they didn't disagree with them.
If none of this makes any sense ask your gramps to explain it to you.
You could find sources for power that doesn't literally kill the planet
You do realize it's the exact dilemna humanity is going through right now right? Hope you don't live on a coast or you'll regret trusting Shinra in 20 years when your house is below sea level
Yeah, fusion has been 20 years away for about 50 years now. We should be building fission reactors right now till fusion is ready but greenie times are pants in head moronic.
No one in ff7 ever suggests an alternative energy source, it's never even mentioned. I'm really trying to remember but does using mako to make electricity even proven to be harmful? Sure they fricked around with the human/mako hybrid stuff and that had terrible consequences but just using mako to keep the lights on seems benign
I think that modern games have much better gameplay than old ones. I'd even rather play the lastest milquetoast, cookie cutter Far Cry game than attempt to play anything released for the NES.
Basically the made the games too hard to navigate, and I HATE those where the frick do I go type of games. Also they didn't have save points where you would want them.
wat
I don't get what OP is asking either. Is this a stealth unpopular opinion thread?
This. What the frick is OP talking about? Is this another chinese bot or a turbo autist? It's 50/50 around here these days.
Is the modern education system really this bad?
>what opposing viewpoints in retro do you respect
What two things clashing to you think is entertaining, honest writing, or is it what do you politically agree with on ur own person gay compass
>Where do you draw the line
Draw the line on what, we are describing an dichotomy, how the frick is there too much or two little dichotomy, it's always a portion of the whole.
So are you asking which "gay" elements in retro games you accept and which you don't? This is hard, you're speaking strangely what is your native language?
i don't use shaders, but don't care if that's how you roll
I respect the false belief that Retro gaming means platforms launched in 2001 and earlier. It's stupid and ridiculous but I respect it.
>It's stupid
>I respect it
Anon I... I'm going to need you to explain what respect means to you.
not OP, but it's like "i think preferring an emulator is fine, but emugays shouldn't shit all over fpgagays"
One can respect something without subscribing to or actively endorsing its validity or intrinsic worth; I assume the poster in question means that he acknowledges the position, while disagreeing with it for being limiting and arbitrary, and does not seek to infringe on or contest the rules as they have been established.
I'll try, but you might not be able to grasp the concepts. A long time ago in a world far, far less woke, people tolerated, and even respected the beliefs and opinions of people who hadn't been programmed to think exactly how they had. Many even respected and obeyed the rules, even if they didn't disagree with them.
If none of this makes any sense ask your gramps to explain it to you.
op this is the stupidest question I've seen in both Ganker and Ganker, you can do better than this
I don't respect any opposing view, otherwise I wouldn't oppose them, I'd just live and let live.
>to buy original hardware
>have carts, doesn't play and doesn't emulate (just collects)
errybady dumb as dirt and mad, except you of course oh pee
vagrant story and silent hill should have been ported to N64 sans voice acting and removing music tracks if necessary
Shinra is absolutely right in ff7, outside thier strange mako/human whatever stuff. What ya want? Turn off the power and let everyone sit in the dark?
>Turn off the power
You could find sources for power that doesn't literally kill the planet
You do realize it's the exact dilemna humanity is going through right now right? Hope you don't live on a coast or you'll regret trusting Shinra in 20 years when your house is below sea level
>just find another power source bro
Yeah, fusion has been 20 years away for about 50 years now. We should be building fission reactors right now till fusion is ready but greenie times are pants in head moronic.
No one in ff7 ever suggests an alternative energy source, it's never even mentioned. I'm really trying to remember but does using mako to make electricity even proven to be harmful? Sure they fricked around with the human/mako hybrid stuff and that had terrible consequences but just using mako to keep the lights on seems benign
I think that modern games have much better gameplay than old ones. I'd even rather play the lastest milquetoast, cookie cutter Far Cry game than attempt to play anything released for the NES.
Basically the made the games too hard to navigate, and I HATE those where the frick do I go type of games. Also they didn't have save points where you would want them.