What would his favourite game be?

What would his favourite game be?

  1. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Bomberman 64.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >64
      >not the OG pre-NES version

  2. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    euro truck simulator 2

  3. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Definitely not Factorio

  4. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    >everyone jerks him off
    >killed a lobbyist, a advertising executive, and a computer store owner
    >everyone else he just caused to get horribly injured

    what was the point of hurting them
    he's not a giga brain visionary, he's just a sick fuck that got off on blowing people's limbs off

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      what, you love lobbyists, advertising executive and computer store owners?
      depends on the computer store, but 2 out of 3 of those we could do less with

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      If he hadn't blow those people up nobody would know avout him or his manifesto. It was a means to an end

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        He could've found a more creative way to get attention that didn't involve killing innocents. Guess he wasn't that smart or creative. Or he's just an evil fuck that didn't even put any effort into thinking of an alternative. Don't mistake him getting some things right in his manifesto as him being smart or correct about everything he did.

        Ted is really in the game btw

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          >innocents
          No such thing.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            Not being a 100% innocent saint doesn't mean you deserve to get murdered, or that your family members deserve to lose you.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            What right does some random ideologue from another state has to murder you? What makes his ideals the end all be all to decide who gets to live or die? He didn't even know his victims personally, he just read their names on some articles or journals, decided they were the enemy, and sent them bombs.
            Very often when people talk about Kaczynski, I think we often gloss over the actual victims of his crusade. Those were human beings that came into work one day like any other and opened their mail, and boom. At best, they get very lucky and suffer only minor damage. At worst, they lose actual limbs or die from it.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      people fear pain anon. there is not a single politician, living or dead, that doesnt deserve to live every waking hour of his life living in fear over what the people he rules can do to him. not one of them doesnt deserve to lose sleep, thinking over policy and legislation and the consequences even the most minor of changes may do to affect the lives of the citizens, he should contemplate suicide at the mere whisper of distrust amongst his citizens - for fear of what justice by the hands of the people deem apt punishment

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah, I'm sure those various computer store owners, college professors and assistants deserved to have a bomb mailed to them
        He killed one person directly involved in politics. Maybe the ad executive as well, but I doubt he had a strong pull in the political sphere.
        The rest were mainly university professors, assistants, and one secretary who were simply pursuing careers they were interested in. And even after they were severely injured, they still kept going. They still kept their research going, they still kept pursuing their careers and passions and contributed to their fields.
        Kaczynski was a coward who could only manage to hurt people by sending them mailbombs and he'll rot in prison. I suppose the one reward he gets is that he'll get to live on as a meme in today's internet.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        We've been through this for HUNDREDS of years now, killing the peons never scares the nobles.
        Poisoning food, had a direct effect. Plague had a direct effect.

        But whenever history tells us about villages dying out in droves you never saw any societal changes unless said village collapsing hurt the bottom line. If this gay wasn't such a pseud he would know this.

        But then again, this guy was just a mk ultra psyop and like all acts of terrorism, just a third party tool to control the masses. You wont really do shit

  5. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    what did this guy even want? And don't reply with an image of a monkey or something similar

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      idk but i think he wanted society to stay without technology

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Blowing up people. That's it.
      All of his preaching about primitivism and being anti-technology, it's just a facade. He just wanted to hurt people while keeping himself safe from scrutiny. Doesn't matter if he had "good" points about the progression of technology and the costs it comes with. He's a murderer and doesn't deserve to be remembered or idolized.
      He's a coward to the end.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      His opinion was that the industrial revolution had created a form of civilization that was both unsustainable and incompatible with human nature

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        If technology is incompatible with human, then human nature sucks, and we must use technology to do something about it.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          Genuine onionslad mentality
          >Yaaaaaasss skynet slaaaaay yaaaassss human 2.0!

  6. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    deltarune or mgs

  7. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Minecraft

  8. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    The Forest

  9. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    UnrealWorld.

  10. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    he's right you know

  11. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Battletoads & Double Dragon - The Ultimate Team

  12. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    MGR or SH2

  13. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Lost Life.

  14. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Who?

  15. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    CS:go
    But he only plays Ts and if you don't give him the bomb he ragequits

  16. 1 week ago
    Anonymous
  17. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    >3. The System's Neatest Trick

    >So, in a nutshell, the System's neatest trick is this:

    > For the sake of its own efficiency and security, the System needs to bring about deep and radical social changes to match the changed conditions resulting from technological progress.

    > The frustration of life under the circumstances imposed by the System leads to rebellious impulses.

    > Rebellious impulses are co-opted by the System in the service of the social changes it requires; activists "rebel" against the old and outmoded values that are no longer of use to the System and in favor of the new values that the System needs us to accept.

    > In this way rebellious impulses, which otherwise might have been dangerous to the System, are given an outlet that is not only harmless to the System, but useful to it.

    > Much of the public resentment resulting from the imposition of social changes is drawn away from the System and its institutions and is directed instead at the radicals who spearhead the social changes.

    >t. Ted Kaczynski

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *