When did /vp/ get stockholm syndromed into liking objectmons. (reminder that objectmons are pathetic and you are a moron for liking them).
I remember during XY leaks, the board rightfully had a meltdown when klefki was leaked. Then over time morons started becoming desensitized and saying "OMG KLEFKI MUH POKEBRO, IT'S LIKE KINDOM HEARTS 0w0!!!" Then There was some deserved backlash against pallosand because they literally put eyeballs on a fricking pile of sand "BUT OMG IT TOTALLY MAKES SENSE BECAUSE GHOSTS LOVE SAND AND OBJECTMONS ARE ALWAYS OKAY AS LONG AS YOU MAKE THEM GHOST/FAIRY TYPE!"
Now creatively bankrupt squiggles like milcery or stupid ugly nonsensical pieces of shit like carkoal that don't even make sense in universe are immediately met with roaring acclaim. "WHO NEEDS MEGAS, I'M GLAD THEY WERE CUT, THEY ONLY DREW AWAY ATTENTION FROM MY FAVORITE POKEMON, A FRICKING SPLASH OF MILK WITH EYES"
At least nobody ever talks about revaroom, but how long until people start writing revaroom fanfiction and filling their instagram stories with this stupid fricking engine with eyeballs?
Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
/vp/ used to hate nostalgiagays anon, its why the term is even used outside Ganker.
That changed and you might see renmants of it but don't act as if it never happened.
>You are literally Satan, a homosexual, a pedophile, and a doodyhead if you like things I hate!
What's even the point if you literally have to FORCE people to agree with you by insulting them?
>NO I DON'T HAVE SHIT TASTE, PEOPLE JUST HAVE A SPECTRUM OF FAVORITES!
If you are going to defend LITERALLY doodling two pupils on a pile of sand, or a splash of milk, or a keychain, or a chandelier, and say they are good designs, you don't deserve a civil conversation.
The best you can hope for is if you just admit to yourself "yes, I know it's objectively lazy to paste eyeballs on a thing, and I refuse to elaborate on any redeeming qualities of klefki, but if I just turn my brain off, I still like it"
>blah blah blah
I don't care, but...
>Or a chandelier
Chandelure, like most "possessed object" Ghost-types, are usually agreed upon as okay because ghosts and spirits are widely known for possessing things. I've always viewed Chandelure as more of a spider-like wraith creature that just so happens to resemble a chandelier (which tend to be found in old haunted houses), but that's just my personal take.
You know what, I kind of agree about chandelure, because at least haunted chandeliers are thematically consistent with haunted houses. or dolls like shuppet, or electronics. But I absolutely drew the line with a ghost possessing a fricking pile of sand, yet people defend pallosand all the time.
Yeah, I don't like Pallossand either, for that very same reason. It could've won some points from me had it at least LOOKED decent, but alas.
So I take it you hate pretty much every JRPG in existence then, since simple designs like that for inexperienced/low level/common monsters have been the staple since this genre's inception. Pokemon isn't doing anything differently here.
megas were shit though
objectmons were always based and you're a moron for disliking them, some are obviously better than others though
ironically i like klefki but there's a lot of people who don't who do like aegislash, not to say i hate him or anything, just i personally would rather him be straightup a possessed suit of armor holding a possessed sword and a possessed shield
maybe it's too on the nose but idk, the best objectmons imo are ancient artifacts like claydol and golurk so i think it would be cool
we always loved objectmons, vp is just full of people who need to make an argument over anything, just wait until someone mentions...
Why do people think stuff like literally my moms animals are good designs?At least objectmons have the effort of copying the thing that exists irl and adding a face and making it behave like a creature. Those just literally copy the thing that exists irl. And at least objectmons look boring/lazy at worse, which are better than stuff like fursuits which are ugly and OP probably thinks are good designs anyway
Because even if a pokemon drawing of a mom's dog is derivative in real life, it is already at a baseline of likability, cuteness, and believably, even if it is on the boring side. People like dogs in real life, that's whey there are cartoon dogs in huge numbers. It's already pretty rare to find cartoons staring splashes of milk.
And like I said, there's the "believability" aspect as well. I know this is a monster game where impossible fantasy creatures exist, but my suspension of disbelief can only do so much when a living creature looks like a relatively new manmade object, like an engine or a key. "BUT WITH GHOSTS AND FAIRIES, EVEN MY PENCIL CAN BE A POKEMON! IT'S SO BELIEVABLE"
So in other words, a design is only good because of the bias of humans. Like how dogs and cats are considered the better animals over invertebrates by most people
Pokemon's setting is also the modern day where wacky creatures live alongside people not some natural frontier world, so the idea of creatures influenced by manmade industrial aspects isn't out of the question. Why do creatures with convoluted lore like Mimikyu and Cubone get a pass but ghosts possessing specific objects don't
>carkol
>met with roaring acclaim
nobody likes that hunk of shit
That picture made me like it a bit.
Objectmons have existed since generation one and are a well established category of pokémon. They are no more or less creative, bankrupt or valid as a pokemon than taking a bird, stylizing it slightly and calling it a pokemon. If you dislike them, you might just dislike pokémon.
>WAAHHH ITS LE BAD BECAUSE I CANT FRICK WITH IT
Objectmons are Objectively based
Kys homosexual troony
it's OK when kanto does it.
you first sperg granny
>people hated klefki why don't they anymore waaaaah
people hated greninja when it leaked. most people did. now it's allegedly the most popular pokemon
almost as if objectmons are not a coherent category you moronic mouthbreather
>during XY leaks, the board rightfully had a meltdown when klefki was leaked
Objectmons have existed since WAY before XY, zoomzoom.
Why is he rocky.
>Megas out of nowhere
Smells like projection
Because I don’t throw a shitfit over trivial things in Pokemon games like you clearly are doing?
I like objectmon
>palossand
>backlash
>milcery and carkol
>acclaim
what universe did you come from
Bedlam Asylum
Did anyone try to catch the Starmobiles by cheats?
I was on /vp/ back then and it sucked, people had much more scripted, boring tastes and you got harassed for liking anything other than edgy or kaijumons.
It's a good thing we have a broader variety of tastes here now.
I'm still not used to being able to post Chesnaught without getting 20 replies of nothing but "shitnaught"
Owlgays are just mad their shitmon will never be as based and underrated as Chessie
Yeah, i agree Magnemite and Beldum sucks
Object Mon appreciation is a sign of maturity. Not everything needs to be a big dragon little Timmy. Go do your homework
Oh and Revavroom is my favorite Gen 9 Pokémon. Stay seething
Go to bed timmy.
>no u
Pathetic
Klefiki is irredeemably shit tho…
autism thread
what thread did you get btfo in hard enough for you to make this thread
because this much autistic rage does not show up unprompted