It's easy, just PROOOMPT
Why are you not making bank off of AI generated vidya?
This phonograph "reads" a rock’s rough surface and transforms it into beautiful ambient music pic.twitter.com/PYDzYsWWf8
— Surreal Videos (@SurrealVideos) March 3, 2023
Community-driven video game blog & discussion
>Drill Drill Drill !!
What is this about?
Oil exploration, obviously.
It's only Sukebei but it's completely shit. Definitely don't recommend it.
us invasion of iraq
It's a new Mr. Driller spinoff.
That's the circle name, idiot.
Not willing to buy a better GPU, learn stable diffusion, and learn renpy just to sell shit games for 8 dollars,
This, imagine learning renpy and then telling your friends "I'm a game dev, I use renpy". Your nerd friends will all give you THAT look, and your programmer friends will also give you THAT look for coding videogames in Python.
I'm not a woman so I don't care about that shit if I'm making a comfortable living off of it.
oh no, your friends are looking at you?! the horror!!!!
what are you, a 6th grader? who fuckin cares what others think, renpy is fun.
Ganker is mostly underages and it shows
>adults don't care what people think about them
Enjoying middle school?
The only time a programmer would give you THAT look is if you told him you liked working with JS.
Renpy isn't that bad...
>Your nerd friends will all give you THAT look, and your programmer friends will also give you THAT look for coding videogames in Python.
Very feminine of you to worry about this kind of thing
What kind of absolute retard PAYS for AI generated images?
Japs mostly.
The game attached to the images is actually, surprisingly, very solid. It's a dungeon crawler where you can be raped/rape any female adventurer you come across during your dives. And/or brainwash/fuck them hard enough to join your party
could you link a video?
What kind of absolute retard PAYS for images in general?
see
>"man why is there so much furry and NTR art online but not for my much more sophisticated fetish?"
>"what? pay for images? lol, lmao even"
so, retards?
Realistically, well done AI generations are indistinguishable from the "real" images as far as anime is concerned if you put the effort in.
No, I'm not talking about retards on twitter posting images of women with hands growing out of their mouths and four legs going "OMG ITS LIKE REAL LIFE ITS OVER FOR FEMOIDS!!!" and making AI look bad, the chances are that you've fell for AI images without realizing it already.
The reason it's hard to distinguish AI images is because our brains see what they want to see. We don't notice the little AI imperfections unless we look for them, and unless we suspect that it's AI generated we don't. You only notice AI generated images at a glance if you've played around with it yourself.
However, if you've manually edited them to do stuff like removing nonsensical patterns, editing proportions, fixing fingers, fixing eyes and lines that go nowhere, then good fucking luck.
yeah, maybe if just give it only a quick glance or you're a pajeet, you might fall for it, but AI stuff is still very distinguishable, and will probably always be since it's a limitation of how a language model works. maybe one day we'll have an AI generate perfect and unique replicas of human works but the current model ain't it. you're falling for the hype of yet another silicon valley investment pit.
Nah, people enjoy the AI art creations and they're all free to generate with stable diffusion so they're here to stay, I'm not talking about investing in anything the AI art tech is not investable since anyone can do it for themselves with SD
people enjoy it in the way of "look mum the computer farted out an image, isn't this amazing". no one is actually gonna pay for half-assed AI generated work, which is all it matters.
Tell me how OP does look like AI
dude look at this shit. it can't even properly do pixel art. the pixel size is all over the place. it looks like a fucked up upscale. not to mention all the other glaring artifacts. these took me a few seconds to spot. google 集中搾精治療室 爆乳ナースと連続絶頂射精治療 and see for yourself
looks better than most pixel art hentai games. I will never understand the AI hate.
that's because you're dumb
Bro I've already seen AI works that look like real photos, where try as hard as I might, I can't see any clear discrepancies
okay pajeet. try and make money with it or present it as a serious work to an audience with a brain. come back to us with the results.
>the chances are that you've fell for AI images without realizing it already.
You shills always say this.
If it's good enough to fool me I don't care if it's AI generated tbh
>the chances are that you've fell for AI images without realizing it already.
AI images are always painfully obvious, even img2img is easy to spot if you're familiar with the original image
bump
>doesnt tag as AI generated
So what now?
fission mailed
Use your damn eyes for once.
The only issue with AI art are hands and other niche things
How will you notice such things when you can easily inpaint them at any time or use AI to generate the base piece and then manually touch it up yourself?
there are many little details and patterns that are extremely easy to recognize in AI, if you can't recognize it instantly you simply don't have working eyes
>you simply don't have working eyes
They usually work well for most people, the issue is the growing lack of empathy from younger people which makes them unable to relate to art as a form of expression rather than a piece of instant gratification which can only be evaluated on a functional scale of how fast it takes to be produced and how much instant gratification you can get from it(and possibly sell it)
There are not. Sure there are little things that AI does, but artists do it as well. Just like the hands people mention same with feet, you have artists who make a great image and then fuck up those.
Also you sound like the redditor who insisted that something is AI made since he can "just see the AI style", but got proven wrong.over and over again.
>Sure there are little things that AI does, but artists do it as well
No shit sherlock, it's almost like it produces nothing on its own. Also there is a very distinct lighting issue with AI art as well which is even more noticeable than thumbs and toes.
>distinct lighting issues
From what i have seen it is just hit or miss with lighting. Sometimes it gets it other times it whiffs. Then again its literally the same with artists. So my question to you is, what are you comparing the AI art too?
A custom comission worth thousands of $ by an artists that had to work his whole life to get to that point, or to the average artist who is going to be charging 3 digits tops.
You can try squirming and convincing yourself otherwise, but AI will absolutely obliterate the landscape of artist jobs. Some might end up being better off after it, but the vast majority is getting proper fucked.
Just look at the complaints people had about it 2 years ago compared to today, hell look at 1 year ago compared to today. The improvements are insane, and with art, you have diminishing returns when it comes to accuracy. Since nobody actually does light right when it comes to art, there will always be a little artistic freedom in the name of making it look good, because the living artist can't put in 1000 hours to perfect reflected light in an image someone is paying 200$ for. The AI does not have that limitation tho, so it will produce a better product for the $. And that is the bottom line. Is it a $ driven market? Well the ai will fucking dominate it, is it a sentimentality driven one or anything not measurable with $? Well then you need to capitalize on that angle or the AI will just do it more efficiently.
>Just look at the complaints people had about it 2 years ago compared to today, hell look at 1 year ago compared to today
This is the usual pajeet cope, believing there are no restrictions to their magical tech which doesn't has the ability to think like human a does. AI art has and will always have uncanny aspects to it which gives a feeling of "something off" but don't you worry I'm on your side, modern art and the younger genetically fucked up + covid ptsd generation won't have the ability to tell it so it'll pass off as the new norm, add that to the fact that everyone just thinks off in terms of how much money they can make off something and how much they can tingle their ego by producing something with minimal effort that would actually require some degree of mastery and it's obvious that art as a form of expression is dead, this souless way to express how much of a cog you are IS the new expression. People using AI as a basis and tracing/altering stuff will also exist but that has nothing to do with the discussion.
The whole point of this tech is that it takes the input from humans on several layers into account. Not only the prompts, you can also plug in outside help like the guy with 3d models has shown that you can use to fine tune posing, but the fact that it is using human drawn art as a base in itself means that it is using human sensibilities.
And guess what, the sheer fact that a human puts in the prompts means that the same human checks the image and either generates a new one, or saves/fine tunes what he got. It literally took a few years to go from barely recognizable scribbles to making uncanny replicas of literally any style. Throw hissy fits all you like, but welcome to the industrial revolution 2.0. You are a fucking weaver watching Cartwright create his power loom.
>but it can't detect mistakes
>but it can't adjust this and that
While you are literally watching it improve month by month.
You're delusional.
Leave the duck nuns out of this
The AI didn't.
>industrial revolution 2.0
>drawing
>the same as being a cog in a factory.
It's okay you also don't understand the implications of killing yet another way to express yourself in a decaying society that glorifies laziness and that's okay, dying in a zoomer hellscape while being part of the problem is a fitting end for you.
>i-i-it has no limitations
It sure does, it's just not relevant because it's intended audience has the same empathy as an AI does.
there are plenty, AI makes mistakes in a way that is very specific to AI, hands, hair tips, eyes, clothing all have that AI quality.
there was some "AI or human test" trending around and i got full score because its so fucking easy to recognize if you have working eyes
i will use my ai to find ai generated images
What if I train an AI to produce works that evades the detection of your AI meant to find AI works?
if it's closed source then you can't automate your ai training
Simple. Report you so you're one step closer to getting your account permabanned. If you can be spiteful, so can I.
You aifags are like chuds. You keep acting like people can't naturally tell.
As an artist, it's a shame seeing AI art on there. I thought they were more honorable than that.
It's mostly chinks and k*reans flooding the site.
They have no honor as they are not even human.
Stay mad artfag
I bet your "art" is complete crap
But anon, AI art isn't good either. It's like a Bigmac. It's "good enough".
Comparing artists who strive to be better to AI which will forever produce "good enough" for the plebs is pointless. Neither sides have the same objective.
plenty of soulless tech accelerationists out there. it's not just jeets
I’m waiting for them to start shilling brain chips en masse
>As an artist
That sounds so last century.
If I made a porn game like a VN I would probably use AI for backgrounds. Better than using real world pictures and putting a filter on it.
There are stock VN backgrounds sold for pennies.
all those 5 stars? all me.
the one you posted were fixed by actual artist.
same with that dicky CG images collection.
>same with that dicky CG images collection
Honestly I think that's the best way to go about it. Use the AI as a baseline, then touch up the image yourself and make it yours.
still not easy enough. It has to be as easy as "make art assets for new game in the style of Clymenia, include boob enlargement scene"
Well at least they're priced right if they aren't short as fuck
How do you get an AI to generate an entire game? I can picture it making a bunch of stuff for the game, and even coding parts of it, but surely you'd need a human to actually assemble it and proof the code etc.
You don't. You get it to generate enough to trick retards into going wow look at this without looking into it. Then you run with the money.
What kind of absolute retard PAYS
I have dignity and self-respect.
>to have male MC games that aren't cuck games you have to rely on AI
Grim
thanks god artists aren't needed anymore
I don't know how to
Are those actually AI generated?
I checked and there's an explicit tag for AI generated content. It is AI the creator just touched up on it and threw it in a pixelization filter. It's way more obviously AI in his earlier game that one on the right.
Yeah I looked it up kinda fucked up but I guess most artists trace shit anyway so Ai isn't much different
the same retards that fell for crypto and NFT, now think that an overglorified search engine will be tool to finally make them rich. most of them are brown people, so I don't feel too bad about it.
When you realize that in India, the average yearly age is around 2k USD, anything quick and easy is needed.
Youtube marketing, use music you published since you get money from that along with the ad being played.
>Youtube marketing, use music you published since you get money from that along with the ad being played.
Unfathomably cunning anon and, dare I say, based.
You pay a couple of pennies for each ad, if somsone watches the full ad which has a full song, you get some of it back. But if it's only the first five seconds viewed, you only get 1/10 of a penny.
Yes, also there isn't anybody can do if you claim it isn't AI since there is no way to identify AI works outside of the fucked up parts, which can be edited out. Basically AI art that is really good and sometimes edited can pass as real art for most people, and some people will accept certain types of flaws since it is common.
AI or not, the game on the left is neat from what I grasped when trying it out but I can't read Japanese, translation when?
Alright fuck it.
Give me a deep, and I do mean 'deep', rundown on how to properly shill your game (good websites, social marketing, whatever). nodevs and literalwhos need not apply, I need expert opinions here.
just make a thread on Ganker with links mods don't care about blatant advertising apparently
True, good suggestion. They're usually too busy jerking off to bait threads or banning offtopic but actually ontopic discussions to care.
just make a playable demo and hope anons get erect while playing
Be honest and show gameplay (if applicable). A demo would be the best.
>spoonfeed me
How about you jump off a bridge?
looked at the previews of those. Not even worth a pirate.
AI art is cheap. you can only make chink tier VN with it. it however might still be better than amerimutt tumblr woke trash.
Good idea for background content.
the problem of VN and other RPG is the lack of CG for side characters who break the immersion.
if AI is used outside the main content to create a better enviroment then the product quality will be good tier
instead if is used to reduce the production, aka if is used to avoid and reduce working then the result will be shit.
AI art can't draw hand-ACK
Yeah the memes about hands have already become outdated
This shit works fast
>all AI art looks sam-ACK
not my problem, take 5 - 15 pictures of artist's artstyle I like, feed it to LoRA trainer, 30 minutes later artstyle copied
>its copyright infringement
artstyle is not copyrighted, not my problem
what site is that?
Looks like civitai
>AI can only copy what it saw, it can't improvise/reimagine things, your artstyle is stuck in helltaker character-ACK
false, AI can transfer artstyle u trained on to any character and any environment, and you can mix LoRA's. Create LorA for hoe-boive fubuki character, create lora for helltaker artstyle
>prompt: fubuki hoe-boive, helltaker artstyle,
>actually looks like that vtuber that i dont know much about
>actually looks like that pokemon girl with the weird half bald hairstyle
I remember some anon telling me that AI couldn't do specific characters. Fuck it really is over isn't it.
Cute fox wife but…
>ear cropped off
>Fubuki in Helltaker artstyle
Alright, I'm kinda hyped, but it sure feels like a monkey paw.
AIchad won
do you not see that giga thumb on the right hand anon
Doesn't anyone else find it scary how fast AI art is improving?
>Doesn't anyone else find it scary how fast AI art is improving?
No, I don't get scared by technology being effective, because I'm not a retard
When AI reaches the point where it can improve itself without human input, we will achieve the technological singularity and there's no telling what could happen then.
And how do you suppose the current machine learning programs pick up that skill?
Tom gay
but you are a retard with narrow scope
AI will be used for totalitarian control over population
Are you scared of cameras too then?
He is right tho. The fact that these tools are so availible only means that more rights will be willingly given over by the majority. You will require an ID to access the internet, because muh AI spook. Just like how they tried and actually succeded during the covid crysis to normalize tracking citizens in quite a few countries. Because of this AI shit, things are gonna get a looooot worse for a lot of people.
No bro you don't have to think about the implications of AI art used against you or the long term consequences of it in culture, just produuuuuuuuuuce and fuck artfags frfr.
taking Roko's basilisk into account
I, for one, welcome our new AI overlords
>AI will be used for totalitarian control over population
so nothing will change?
>AI scares the manchild who dislikes modern technology
when will this balding baby fuck the hell off. He routinely has braindead take after braindead take.
If u watch the video its not AI that scares him, but the fact a complex language prediction pattern is indisdinguisable from a human even if you're aware its AI
What "scares" him is that we might not be anything more than fleshy pattern machines and surprises is just our algorithm failing
>he didn't see the video
Implying he isn't right. You already have people using really shitty AI voice generated clips to scam people. There was the whole Joe rogan supplements shit wasn't there? Where someone used a really badly generated voice of him endorsing some pajeet product. Shit is gonna get wild in the comming years.
>just think of the dummies who will get scammed!!!
as if that isn't already the case with the internet in general. This is only a problem for retards who can't tell the difference or have even a modicum of suHispanicion/doubt
exponential growth
eventually, AI will be able to introduce output into itself as training
then explosive ai growth will ensue through self-improvement cycles, each one shorter than the last
this will not be limited to images
technological singularity
How, exactly, do you intend to define "improvement" to the AI?
if you're capable of defining improvement then so can the AI
AI is sovless
you are soulless, i am soulless, everything is soulless because soul doesn't exist
just like the human brain
just give it internet access, boom, here's your data
>just like the human brain
If it's just like the human brain then how did new styles evolve? Also, no one knows how the human brain works. And don't say LOL IT'S JUST NEURAL NETWORKS because that's just a crude over simplification.
everything comes referencing already existing things, or mix and matching existing ideas/concepts, nothing is originial because from the day we are born we are bo,barded with data from all our senses, we see colors and images, we hear sounds and music, we smell, we taste, we touch and feel, all of that hoes into the brain database and is later used as reference whenever we trycreating something "new" but even the simple act of creating is already an unoriginal thought imparted onto us by our enviroment through preception
extract the 5 senses of a fetus and all that remains inside the mind is an empty void no matter how long you wait
AI can't make any new styles because it has to check the data it already has.
> nothing is originial because from the day we are born
That's amazing. Is that we still just make cave paintings? You're an idiot.
>anon mad that a program specifically created for pattern recognition and image generations following said patterns aren't creating new patterns of its own
i mean, it's not that that the AI cannot generate its own original style (you can just feed it its own generated data) its that we specifically designed it not to because that's not what we want ai to do
plus, our current image generators really only have data about pixels and their relationships to other pixels, you can't expect it to reproduce things from the real worls properly when the only data it has about the world are just pictures and words related to them
It can't generate it's own style because it has to check against the data it already has if it drew the right thing.
what, you think it can just magically generate data out of nothing that somehow perfectly represents something existing in our world when it has no fucking information to work with? i mean, even humans would find it hard to draw something they do not know and be expected to come up with something that has no relation to even a single piece of data they already recognize, and even then its an unfair analogy because adult (or even child) humans already have many years gathering and collecting data from a variety of inputs and has been interacting with them and have been doing so all the time since their birth while these algorithms only get pixels and words to go along with them. if a human makes an error in their art, they can usually just check their references or see if it matches up with previous information they know of from gathering said references. art styles themselves are not wholly novel either, its a mix of what you already know, what you want to capture, and how you draw. you could have literally made better arguments than this, like arguing how current ai models still suffer from not understanding how hands work and how letters should be shaped and arranged into, or how it is unethical that they're scraping data from artists without their permission, or whether or not it is legal to sell something that's generated by an AI
Again if think humans worked like that we'd never get past cave paintings. Thanks for the essay.
>misunderstanding the point
anon, the reason why human art has progressed beyond cave paintings is exactly due to the three factors i've stated earlier. caveman art began as a way to represent the world using what they have, and when agriculture became a thing, people could spend more time making art using newer tools they've developed and find better ways to represent the world around them, and the more they did it the better they became at it. they developed symbols that they came to associate with different things, but those symbols obviously came from something that already exists in the real world.
what i'm saying is that you're literally saying that ai can't generate novel art styles because it has to cross-reference it with the patterns of data it had already recognized despite the fact that humans also cross-reference patterns of data it had already recognized and stored into their memory in combination with the medium they are working with and what they want it to look like to create new art styles. there is still cross-referencing involved.
image generators are perfectly capable of generating their own novel art styles, the problem is that the patterns it might recognize and generate would make no sense to us because the ai 'experiences' the world in a fundamentally different way than humans and thus derive entirely different patterns from them.
Literally any time you prompt any existing art style it is creating a new art style because what it knows of that art style is merging with the model's own in-grained art style.
You don't have a point you're being so vague that what you're saying is meaningless.
>It can't generate it's own style
I'll never understand how dumb you have to be to think this.
1+2=3. Anime+Realism=new artstyle also ayyylmao
Wow it looks like ass. Good job.
Naturally, but it's still a new art style and AI has made millions of new artstyles that way.
Anime with slightly smaller eyes. Good job.
That AI "draws" boobs better than Oda.
>fucks up drawing one of the most popular female anime characters
its literally better than what you see in one shit nowadays
I like the 'e' tattoo on her right boob.
It's fucking L with tits la dee da
>i am soulless
ok bot
you are an organic machine programmed by evolution and learning to respond to external stimuli in specific ways and there's nothing you can do to prove me wrong
you're an idiot, no proof required
AI can't make anything new because it has to check from it's work from the source data.
They also can't do proper lighting but who cares, you're a bugman either way.
Those hands are wrong?
Are you retarded?
>can't draw hand-ACK
>posts picture where the AI gives extra joints to fingers
What does he mean with that? This anon trully is mysterious.
,..thats how my hands look
I bet women would love your fingers
Now look at those fucked up eyes.
Both of those hands have extra jointed fingers and floating separated thumbs. And even if the hands were decent, the eyes and ear are still fucked up and garbled.
damn they've made over 181397 dollars after the dlsite cut
AI art is good and here's why
this is the best guide for the best anime version & models
I dont have a rich pc tho. and collab is limited
any good pages in there?
Unironically, it's faster and cheaper to use AI art in other ways. Some stuff is so low effort that 90% of the time it takes to do is the time to upload templates and get it approved. Video games are very complex and require a lot of moving parts. Many other things do not.
>You can't use AI to generate specific poses/situatio-ACK
false, controlnet can be used for that, if you need high fidelity you can use blender to generate controlnet pose data
clock is ticking artcels, tick tock
Is that blender?
link to the pose model(s)?
https://toyxyz.gumroad.com/l/ciojz
nice
thanks
>all that complicated work to get something that doesnt look the way i want it
ok
Those look fucking magnificent.
based but the first picture still looks like shit anatomically
at that point you're just an artist with a different set of tools
i think this AI shit just prove how low effort most art is
AI art is non copyrgihtable right? When the hell is someone gonna use the AI to generate RPGM tilesets and spread it because I'm absolutely sick of seeing the default ones
>artists mock coders for decades
>anyone can learn to code but art requires skill and talent
>chuds rise up and make artists obsolete
its over
yes artists can't be fully replaced but with the speed of AI art generation advancements, artists are no longer able to leech 1800$ or more from commisions
wake me up when it can draw anything other than boring hyperrealism and animeslop
If you are one of the premade models, you can ask it to draw a certain artist's style. Thomas Kinkade is goyslop too, but you get what I'm saying.
I think I saw someone made pc98 style Lora.
skill issue, learn to use LoRAs/finetuning
regular sd with controlnet extension and LoRA extension
>regular sd
...so then this shit is only compatible for paypigs using the censor'd generator. Cool cool.
What generator is this? New SD branch or Midjourney?
is that why you spam? just impotent seethe?
Anyone can learn to draw. Unless you have Parkinson's or don't have hands, I suppose.
>Anyone can learn to draw. Unless you have Parkinson's or don't have hands, I suppose.
Actually...
The character designer for Rumble Roses also drew with his mouth
can learn to code but art requires skill and talent
Why is this the go to for AIPajeets? Can they really not spend some time off their day to draw something? I'm not a good artist, but even I do that.
Proooompters are not coders you fucking moron
I can't wait for AI to produce expressive ahegaos/nhogaos like those created by takeda and akatsuki giken
It's good to be alive bros.
I don’t want to use AI
I like making things myself and I don’t think it can make my rpg since it will be a text based game inspired by the likes of Conan, farfhd and the gray mouser, thieves world, etc. aka an actual rpg and not coomer slop for the dregs of society.
It's sad to think storytelling a decade from now will be workmates telling you about their personalized fantasy part-scifi melodrama they've been watching/reading that's totally unique to them while you wonder if tonight's the night you take an AI porn plunge or swallow buckshot.
Yes it’s sad to think that humanity will become a bunch of lotus eaters however I don’t think it likely to happen this century. A personalized book simply wouldn’t provide the same level of engagement.
A lot of shit will happen after than you think with current technological progressions. There will probably be a second full on cold war before anything major.
>lmao just learn to code
>OMG NOT LIKE THIS I'M GONNA STARVE
artist gets too lazy to draw,
trains AI on his own art then generates drawings instead
oh no no
Those don't look alike at all though
>search up this thread expecting artist seethe
>both the comments and QRT's are instead filled with bugmen shills
ebic
>load up AI with drawings from my favorite porn artist
>Proompt my commissions instead of paying for them
Is this unironically possible already?
Seems like it yea. The more effort you put in the better the results as well and its only getting better by the day.
Kinda. LoRA is pretty powerful although it is not one click wonder.
Yah, that's pretty much what a lora does, you'll train it with a few images on top of an existing, larger model.
>my style
genuinely cannot wait for AI to become prevalent enough to put retards out of business who genuinely believe they are unique. Any skilled artist can replicate any "style", a style is not unique to a person ffs.
The only reason to be against AI is because the creators are the "you will own nothing and be happy" bugmen
but other than that AI is a fun tool.
>tfw my brain is beginning to recognize AI images instinctively at a glance
it might be as good as my garden gnome detector yet but it's getting there
>see garden gnome in real life
>AI detector goes off
Detecting things that are fake, uncanny, and deformed are part of our natural instincts.
take the AI art test and come back
you wont because your score will be shit
Link it
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdhEpBRnOwiFI-ieNKKu3Y0KcoFbd_ZWod1LeyoV6EEfY78HA/viewform?fbclid=IwAR1BAm3NlDcAkqwgjJAO3MCgw6K-bCTYD1KMTsPtQ6iFWOSprgouYrQL0IE
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdROAyDiRLJ5oPbZIOL3ImpHpk1KQnxcUyq0wVFA2GVhEjcDQ/viewform?fbclid=IwAR03TcSb8iDassYzTvmHrA_2bttMIVWdlBDZ02y_F0Zgbm4DqtcNbt7kZJE
Mostly right
45/45
43 were easy as shit, the other 2 just took a few more glances than usual.
Anybody who can't get at least 40 of this right has some serious cognitive issues.
>3 bot responses minutes after a genuine response got btfo
lol. At least try with inspect element screenshots
>bot responses
That's a lot of seethe.
39/45
Doesn't help that my wrong ones were human ones.
Now use one that isn't just filled with generic images to favor the ai
44/45
too easy, AIshills killing themselves
I got 44 out of 45 right. You'd have to be near blind to get more than a couple of these wrong.
remember paying 100$ to artists for heckin animu twitch emotes, not anymore
I don't remember paying for anything twitchtard related ever.
Don't check out fiverr, the average person pays 20 dollars for it.
Thomas Kinkade is the unironic goyslop of the art world. He created the art equivalent to Mcdonalds, forced many people to loose their own local businesses and made really generic art to undersell to be made in puzzles for the general market.
Ultimately, he was very talented, but his art represents instant gratification. The colors used and the normalized settings isn't about thinking about the art, but looking at it instantly to get a warm fussy feeling. He did everything he could to mass market his paintings for mass appeal over being thoughtful.
This AI image has the style used for a factory, ultimately a deeper exploration of art, mocking Kinkade generic and fussy style with adding something darker and deeper about the mass production of it. It can also be used against AI art as well, with the mass production and gratification of instant art.
It is also ironic and funny that goyslop artists AI art is trained to be the best with the most, due to the abundance of the art and how the official pre-models take any image from the internet, even if it shows up multiple times.
>Steal the pixel-art checkpoint database someone posted a while back
>Make lots of anime booba
I approve and wish I had the drive to do something like this.
There's more to drawing then just money. I do it cuz its fun and rewarding. Nothing else compares to it.
You do you, but if you do art for only money you're gonna burn out or get bored fast
that butt though
post more
>I do it cuz its fun and rewarding. Nothing else compares to it.
It's not like anyone is stopping you. Just because industrial processes exists doesn't mean that people are no longer allowed to make things by hand.
>Can't draw
>Make art by photoshopping a bunch of reference images together
>Trace the outlines
>Fill in the details by drawing on a raster
I've been doing the same exact thing the AI does but by hand and with much more control
This shit is so overblown tbh
DLsite and Fanza is banning low effort AI shit so you tech cunts will still need to hire a real artist to fix your shit art. Better start sucking dicks again
Why are these threads always made by butthurt retards?
Just make shit if it is so good, why bother reposting the same shit over and over again if artists are done for and all that drivel.
>8.88$
>over 28k sells
If you take away 30% thats still 19161,53$. Crazy
deleted an 2 its 191261,53
In the future, people will be able to upload an old doujin or hentai, strap on a VR helmet and an AI will recreate the exact same scenario and sensations.
You're going to be dead or too old to enjoy it though because laws and the current generation in charge will do their best to suppress AI development.
We are close to being able to feed an AI with stories from our favourite doujin artist,
Feed another with their art
And have AI fully produce doujins in the style of a specific mangaka.
>You're going to be dead or too old to enjoy it though because laws and the current generation in charge will do their best to suppress AI development.
Because at some point you cancerous AI Fanbois are going to shit up entire markets with your Cheaply made AI slop in an Attempt to make a quick buck that people will will decide it is a Liability to give you fags any platform at all.
like it happened when automation replaced manual labor right?
or are artists just THAT special?
>the act of drawing/producing art is the same as being a cog in a factory.
Not a surprising statement, how old are you again?
i mean, if you're doing it for money... yeah, it pretty much is
It's growing pains. Yes I'm also sick of retards dumping 500 variations of the same pic on pixiv/boorus, but at some point things should settle down, novelty will wear off and people will try to push AI standards even further.
i mean, isn't the current art market oversaturated with coomershit anyway? people just mass producing slop for a quick buck, at least image generators are capable of doing things other than porn, so i don't see the problem here
If the material produced reflects the desires of the people, why would AI produce anything else?
There’s SFW and NSFW artists, I expect the split between those for AI users to be much the same.
It's so good bro. Watch out artists.
You just know one of these fuckups is gonna give someone a never-before-seen fetish.
In the future people are gonna project 10000 AI generated porn pics in their retina over 5 minutes and they will convulsively orgasm at the end.
This is what tripping on DMT feels like.
t. knower
I can't quite figure out what's going on, but this still activated the neuron. Makes me think of what Zach Hadel said in an interview about AI generated movies in the future.
>AI will never take our jobs we are just too good at it
>Comparing cherry picked still frames of flavor of the month weeb slop
Will you ever argue in good faith?
As a matter of fact, isn't weeb slop exactly what you love? Why shit on one slop and praise the other?
Meanwhile you are totally not cherry picking from a failed generated prompt. Oooook. You are definitely right. AI will never reach these peaks. AI fags on suicide watch, amright?!
That's CG, stupid.
All AI images are computer generated, you idiot.
No, producers of an expensive good and consumers of an expensive good will never be on the same page when the expensive good gets a cheap alternative of equal quality. Ofc no fucking artist that takes art seriously enough for it to be his job will be happy that there is now out there a program that does his job in a fraction of a second. Oh no its only 95% as good as what the artist does... well shit the artist will need days if not weeks to produce images with high detail, the AI takes minutes. So its a no brainer for any artist, or aspiring artist to hate it.
And ofc every consumer will absolutely love it. Are you saying i don't have to hope that my favourite artist opens comissions so i can pay him 600$ for a colour sketch that he will deliver in a week... i can just get the AI generate 50 images in an hour?
Geeeee, i wonder why those 2 groups are not on the same page.
>All AI images are computer generated, you idiot.
Yeah and they suck. Retard.
Ok genius. Give us a complete model of human consciousness. Then go get your nobel prize.
Ummm is she doing the air handjob thing?
all im saying is, there's no proof we all aren't just tricking ourselves into believing that we are capable of "deeper thought" and thus the human mind is no different from a computer
That's great retard. You're the on telling us in a really vague way that were just a "machine". That's meaningless. It helps no one to be reductive.
how do you feel about the fact that computers are digital and brains are analog? I feel like this is a small difference that makes up for fundamental changes.
Exactly my point. Creative people and consumers will never agree wuth eachothet because one wants to be spoonfed while the other is the giver. I don't do art for money so I am not seeing AI as competition, but if anything, AI shows just how utterly unappreciative and entitled consumers really are and that does bother me on a personal level sometimes.
Good for you if you can get AI slop. That's all you deserve anyways because you have never appreciated the production process behind whatever you shove down your face.
people want results
they dont care if you "wowked weawwy hawd" on your doodles
>people want results
"Hello, anon. This is your boss. We have a new mascot for our company. Can you generate the design wearing a cowboy hat and a police uniform that fits the style by the end of the afternoon? Thanks."
No, consumers want results. Creators are in love with the process.
It's only bad for those who rely on their talent to get paid, but for anyone else, it's showing the bitter truth that it really isn't worth it to do art for money because your customerbase is uneducated and entitled.
In the end, the AI split is a good thing. Artists return to purity and are no longer shackled to the peasants that made their livelyhood.
thats the biggest cope i've ever seen. yeah i'm sure artfags are way excited to do their art for free while going back to doing whatever shitty 9-5 they were using art to escape.
Every transitional process will be difficult, but you have to look on the long term.
Slop NPC get their automatically generated BigMacs abd they get fat on the garden gnome juice.
Meanwhile artists can do business with people who actually appreciate human effort and are willing to pay mire per commission because of the niche or potential investment.
The mold didn't kill sculptors, it pnly made them niche enough to sell to bourgeoisie.
There is nothing bad in this outcome. Everyone get what they want.
Best for me; i can make MY ideas and not have to pay. Stupid shit with ITS STEALING MY ART TO STUDY AND LEARN. Fuck you, anyone can do that, its how HUMANS LEARN. But tiny bits of MY ART is inside the AI art.
How? How is your art inside it? Fuck off.
Learn english please.
>i can make MY ideas and not have to pay
Ideas such as?
big ditty anime girl
>i can make MY ideas and not have to pay
And what exactly are your ideas?
>NOOOO MUH LABOR THEORY OF VALUE MUH COMMUNISM NOOOOOO
Not him but i value effort. Stone henge could be built in a day with 1 guy and a crane. I dont pay for commissioned art anyways but if i found out i paid for prompted art id demand a refund. Its a lot less impressive.
People want good and varied results catered to their specific requests. AI shit can't even do the basics.
>unappreciative
the appreciation was in the money you were paid retard. we're not friends, we're customers, artists don't exactly do anything for free out of the kindness of their own hearts.
And the moment the cheaper alternative emerges, the customerbase vanish like ghosts.
No loyalty whatsoever. You never appreciated the work. The only reason you paid at all was because you had no other choice.
>You never appreciated the work. The only reason you paid at all was because you had no other choice.
yes. thats the free market for you. why exactly are artists owed loyalty again? are artists and their customers friends now or something?
That is why maming art for money is a miserable life. You're better to find a niche of people who really appreciate your craft instead of chasing gold.
The tech industrial path will always be the wisest path for money since free market is entirely dependant on tech progress. This is why I work as an electric technician and do art mostly as a hobby and sell maybe one or two commissions a year for pocket money to people who want a tattoo or a banner/logo for their project.
>You never appreciated the work.
Neither do you, you just like to claim you do.
At the end of the day, you want results, be it in either entertainment or day to day shit.
Anon, I am the one creating the art. How could I not be appreciative of the process when I subject myself to it for hours on a regular basis. This is the difference between creative types and consoomer cattle. You get everything for as cheap as possible and with as little output on your part because you feed yourself short term dopamine.
Creation is long term dopamine. It's like growing a tree or raising a child. It's all long term wffort and investment and that is where the pride comes from.
Someone who cycles through brands and products to get high for a moment will never understand this.
>Anon, I am the one creating the art.
Present it.
So that you can just say "HAHA NGMI" in a very desperate and vain attempt to demoralize me? Fat fucking chance. Been there, done that.
Just know that in any other thread, I got nothing but praise everytime I posted my art. Only in those threads full of AI goblins slop addicts have I ever gotten negative feedback for posting my art. This is proof in itself that you are dishonest and only out there to one-up me.
Go fuck yourself. Make something of your own before you criticize and shit over what other make. Ignorant cattle. Now present your next original zinger to trully buen me. Say something along the line of "HAHHAHAHA HE WON'T POST BECUZ HE AFRAID XD XD XD GOOD MORNING SIRS!"
Good morning, sirs.
>So that you can just say "HAHA NGMI"
Why so defensive?
I don't care how hard and long you worked on my pizza, I care if it's tasty and the kind I wanted.
>art as a product
Can't copyright AI swill. 😉
>muh copyrights!
so much for artistic integrity
Your post was complete nonsense. Good job.
>>art as a product
Most "artists" use their "art" for omissions and to sell what they make.
You are not my customer so if you don't pay for shit that I make, I don't give a fucking damn about whether you like it or not.
Hey, since you insist on making this about free market. Here's an idea. You pay me upfront, then I give you the drawing. Then you will be allowed to complain.
Sounds fair? That's because it is not.
The same way it is not fair to shit on someone's hand made art because you treat yourself like a bourgeois despit ethe fact that you're a slop eater.
I haven't shat on you, at least yet. You haven't even given my the proper chance.
And I won't because you are not out there shopping for talent or in the good faith intention of trying to help me improve. This is a shitflinging thread where we are at eachother's throat. How stupid would I be if I gave you the knife to stab me with?
I never claimed to want to help you improve, I wanted you to present you art since you have your head up your ass about being a "creator".
Yes, so you can shit on it.
I already know the outcome, there is no point indulging you.
I will deny you the respect that you deny me. Fucking die.
>Yes, so you can shit on it.
Best of luck in your future endeavours.
Same shit I told you earlier. If you don't lay me, you can voice your conplaints to management.
Here is my boss' number:
The insecurities of starving artists are out of this world.
How can you know? You will never see my work.
Fuck you, pay me. This is about how superior you are because you get to keep your money? Then that's easy. Pay, then you'll be allowed to talk shit.
In tye meantime, keep weakly trying to demoralize me because you're mad your little rivalry with artists is entirely made up and you talk from the perspective of an entitled, disrespectful consoomer cattle who loves to be spoonfed. No art for you.
>Fuck you, pay me.
lmao, beg more
Funny because I am not doing art for money and never pretended to. I am playing on your level. You are the entitled Karen customer who's most effort in the bargain is pulling money out of your purse which, in your mind, gives you all the right to treat me like a bitch.
Well no money, no whore. I wpn't suck your dick unless you pay for it. So no money=absolutely worthless opinion.
Again, voice this to my manager.
Here is the number:
>I wpn't suck your dick unless you pay for it.
How admirable.
They say being a whore id the oldest profession in the world because everytime you do anything for money, you whore yourself.
No money=not your whore. Shove your entitled consoomer opinion down your throat and keep ordering from Domino's if eating literal shit can make you happy.
>They say being a whore id the oldest profession in the world because everytime you do anything for money, you whore yourself.
You didn't talk about just anything, you talked about sucking dick.
Shoo, gay.
Not that guy but my AI art gets praised outside of these threads too. Post your art.
>prompt says nude
>she's clothed
>my ai art
It's not your art. You just made a request. The program took recreated other peoples data into an abomination.
>you didnt make the art, you just put the paint on a canvas
He knows. He's a troll.
>those feet
>"masterpiece best quality"
>finger, toothbrush, and mouth melting together
>"nude"
>she's wearing clothes
>"hands"
>it's just one hand with a random finger coming from the upper left
>all those different rows of teeth in her mouth melting into her flesh
>that four-toed foot
>that random finger coming from behind her shoulder
>aifags think this shit is good
Look that that big finger growing from her back and her shirt merging into her chest area.
>huge finger growing out of her back and up to her face
I love it when you pajeets put in "masterpiece" prompts for images that look like deformed garbage.
>that mouth
>that hand
>that foot
>prompt says nude but she's wearing a clothes
Yet again you retards show how incompetent this "AI" shit is. It keeps contradicting even your most basic inputs.
Oh yeah can you make this? Fucking art fags.
is that an anus or a nipple?
It can be whatever you want bb.
AI messing up can be funny.
The prompt also says to wear a shirt I just didn't post those because they're nsfw
https://files.catbox.moe/cietua.png
It's just too easy.
You replied to me.
So you wanted the shirt to have a random opening that fades into the skin and a mouth where there's a row of flesh-teeth in the back?
I didn't know that Karen Araragi could grow an extra index finger out of her shoulder and only has 4 toes on each foot.
That mouth is distractingly horrendous.
Aifags post the deformed shit in full confidence.
Check it
This bugmen mentality really raises so many question as to which country you people are from. I've never met a single artist who got into art solely for money, there are always some degree of enjoyment out of the career they've choosen, if you ever had the opportunity to enroll in a school, you can even tell who might or not pursue an artistic career from an young age. Stop comparing art to stuff like working a factory and acting like they're the same for a living you fucking pajeet.
I'm a consoomer, and AI shit is pretty much 95% garbage. Who the fuck jacks off to CG galleries of portraits? AI can't draw ANY fetish shit yet. Once it gets good, then we will see. It's simply not at the level of jacking off to yet.
>but it will get better.
And I look forward to it, but if the garbage slop it produces now is considered good, then it will stagnate. Especially since people seem to think AI = Artificial Intelligence, despite it just being a marketing gimmick like with VR.
Nope, my argument is simply that this debate in itself is fucking retarded. Clearly artists and slop eaters will never be on the same page, so why even try to one up eachother? You will never argue in good faith. You will never actually "win".
Why not just eat your slop and stop pretending we live in the same world?
Cherry-picking is the point dude, he's replying to a guy cherry-icking shitty AI pics.
Still looks better in motion than AI art does.
Please, slow down on the copium, you will overdose.
Enjoy this gif for ants.
At least it doesn't flicker or look like rotoscoping.
because AI is used by more than one person and it being more convenient and widely adopted means that there will be people who'll eventually use it to generate random inane shit?
That has unironically already been happening for a low of really low effort stuff. But they are in markets already shit up, so AI art looks like an improvement.
artbros, it's over...
Gen alpha and its offsprings are your problem, I'll be dead long before you kids turn Earth in a living goy hellscape.
No point, the government is gonna tax most of what I earn anyway
>DUUUDE AI
>Meanwhile bank that holds every AI startups savings collapses
These sites are all going to shut down by next week due to nonpayment of workers + hosting fees, enjoy proompting while you can
>SVB was the only bank who would do business with people with insufficient liability
>what ever will my shitty dirt-poor country do now
dude should spend more effort on reducing the shitting in the streets problem instead of whining about their white savior.
>bank collapsed
>bailout already approved
Bro, US banks go trough several bailouts a year. Literal nothingburger. They already know they are too big to fail, so they just collapse every so often because they know they will be injected with fresh liquid cash from daddy goverment if they do.
In the last 5 years there have been 9 insolvent US banks
In the last 10 years it was like 48 or something.
I think what is different this time is the size
Imao. Just look at the latest news regarding SVB, every piece is pro bailout. Its just gonna be the same old story. From what i heard it was not a total collapse either, isn't stuff below 250k or something covered?
So………
Where IS your game?
Anyone at all?
Why would anyone ever pay for AI art? Its like paying for someone to Google something for you.
I don't know but I've been seeing a lot of AI patreon and fanboxs
>fan box
>Pixiv is putting the screws on e-boi, shota, incest, and gore content because some AI fags posted art trained with CP
>~~*some*~~ AI fags
There's still some sort-of-programming knowledge required to train these bots, and know what to feed it to get the desired result. Odds are you won't be able to get the same quality results that someone who has been tinkering with it for the last few months will.
People who pay for art are weird. You've got to have pretty specific tastes to not just fap to basic settings.
And people on this board were coping not even a month ago that AI art gets 'no engagement' compared to real artists kek
>dude just make shovel ware crap. if everyone's doing it then the value will surely go up.
Did you actually need more proof that the average Ganker poster is a fucking low education pseud retard who likes to run his mouth exclusively about subjects he knows nothing about?
>ITT retards who don't know how ai works arguing about which one of them is right
If making money was easy, everyone would be rich and if everyone was rich, nobody would be rich and money wouldn't be worth shit.
So get the fuck out with your get rich quick schemes that never fucking work.
The solution for that is fixating prices, so apples dont cost 1k dollars.
>One of my favorite artists is abusing AI to hell in order to make more art
>While also being a fan of AI VTuber
Sugee
>Want to generate e-boi AI Art
>Just know that as soon as I type that shit into stable diffusion I'll be put on a list
Run it locally. Also, won't typing that here put you on the list too?
>not overloading their lists to the point of uselessness
>everyone shit on AI
>use AI to make a h game
>best fucking seller od dlsite
to be fair this guy is doing ai pixel art, everyone else is using the exact hyper realism prompt you see in gacha shit threads.
>aifags think low res garbled line art automatically makes it pixel art
>pixel art
It's literally running a CSP auto action over it. This is not pixel art lmao
>that linework
>that inconsistent colouring and shading
I thought they took AI art and made sprite work out of it but holy shit they just downscaled the art instead and called it a day. They didn't even bother polishing up some sprites like the purple hair of the far left middle row girl.
>I thought they took AI art and made sprite work
Doing that stuff would still take creativity and effort which is what aifags avoid at all cost.
Yeah and I hate it.
>AI gives everyone the power to be creative and can be used as a tool to aid in any project
>AI ends up just making people lazier and do the bare minimum for a quick buck
Worst part is that it's working meaning instead of AI improving the quality of projects, it's only going to enable people to half-ass everything and make low quality shit because it sells.
and this leds to the next crash, and from the ashes better games will rise again
it will be the 90's all over again
You aren't making any sense. Right now you can barely draw stick men but the moment you pick up AI art you can "draw" anything you want. Laziness barely has a factor in the creation of images anymore. Once AI moves into other areas the same thing will happen. You'll "lazily" be able to make something on the level of -your favorite game-. In no way is this a bad thing if you enjoy video games.
>you cant draw lalalala
>2 more weeks sir
>everyone enjoys low-quality slop
holy pajeet cope
Feel free to prove me wrong but I'm making a reasonable assumption. And AI already is in other fields.
And you can have a love and passion for creating and improving with AI too. You say I'm soulless but you're just ignorant and angry.
Hello sir!
You sure showed me with this poor woman has a disjointed deformed right arm. Is your eye sight this bad or have no never seen a person before?
>My passion is typing words into a machine that steals pics and smashes them together
>Feel free to prove me wrong
The burden is on you to prove your bullshit.
Also its not AI, which shows how obvious of a retarded shill you are
you can't
That's not how it works lol. You're trying to argue without making any points. I said you cannot draw, you proved you cannot draw by not refuting me with your art.
>B-B-BUT SEMANTICS
lmao.
But it followed it perfectly, it's a character + booru tags.
>prompt says "hair between eyes"
>non of the characters have hair between the eyes
the world is ending ......... My Yoshida loras that don't like bangs fought the prompt off. It's ogre.
>the moment you pick up AI art you can "draw" anything you want
People draw and paint because they have a love and passion for creating things and improving their skills. It's not about random images popping up. Soulless bug.
Good for them but most of us just want the art to enjoy the end product of, and this tech makes it easier for us to get what we want.
>prompt says "bobcut"
>character doesn't have a bobcut
That is not a messy long bob cut. ANd it's definitely not a masterpiece with those deformed eyes and hand.
>'you can "draw" anything you want'
>posts a generated image that doesn't follow what was wanted in the prompt
>pick up AI art you can "draw" anything you want
So you wanted a woman with eyes looking in opposite directions with deformed irises, eyelids that look like they've been burned, front teeth that look like a toothbrush bristles, and fingers that look like they belong to an alien?
pyw
>you can "draw" anything you want
Except, yknow, any detail. It's fucking horrendous at small details.
The image-producing AIs are currently heavily coasting on the fact that human brains are VERY good at filling in blanks and bridging things that are "close enough," which works very well at a glance but is useless for anything that wants to have fine detail.
This is compounded by the fact that SD spits out what, a 512x512 image on most settings?
You and I both know that isn't true and you can get higher resolutions.
https://github.com/pkuliyi2015/multidiffusion-upscaler-for-automatic1111
This came out recently for NASA tier resolutions. Feel free to use it.
Like I said. Good at a glance, falls apart at any cursory inspection.
Now open the link
>open link
>click on example image
>immediately greeted with this
Please tell me you're false flagging.
Shadows are inconsistent with light source.
The furniture placent makes no sense because it seems to be placed against a non existing wall where the character face
The book doesn't hold on anything.
Human proportions are shit.
Floor tiles are layered over eachother.
I wonder if they have self awareness.
For the love of god please tell me you are false flagging, you can't believe this looks good.
Did you not look at this before you posted it? It's nonsense.
That's the point, he's arguing against it.
That's my point.
It's from the "super high res ultra detailed" example in that github.
Perspective makes no sense.
Everything in the environment blends together in an uncanny way.
There is no sense of depth, the image feels flat.
Terrain elevation is not consistent
I won't even comment on those faces.
Why are AI fags so allergic to accepting that they just don't appreciate quality?
Not that anon, but it adds "detail" in the sense that it's just an upscale guesser.
It doesn't add anything and only makes existing "details" sharper or more pronounced no matter how nonsensical they are.
tl;dr it's worthless for anything but upscaling normal art
That's not what it's doing, upscaling is inherently blurring or stretching pixels but this isn't upscaling.
This looks fucking terrible.
Now I understand why retards claim that "AI" is photobashing.
If you don't know how it works and look at stuff like this it would be an obvious conclusion.
Guys, it's the economy. Doesn't matter if its quality is too 'shit'. It only matters that it is CHEAPER than the alternative. The fact that AI's cheap and you can get PLENTY of prompts out of it compared to ONE commission of artists is what should be worrying you. That and the fact that the near-instant making of the art is also pretty cool.
That and all the artists I liked went to the ether a long ass time ago, I AM GOING TO REVIVE THEIR ARTSTYLE WITH AI
Good morning, sirs.
Too much work for the money, and that's if your project takes off amd isnt overlooked in a sea of indie games.
Drawslaves on suicide watch.
>The 5th one
AI animation technology is still raw, but this definitely might be possible in the near future.
I will not play for ai
Gosh, I sure hope AI doesn't replace actual artists, it's so soulless!
>actual artists
AI can't replace artists because it needs art for it to function lmao, it's the same as needing coal miner's output for the machines to work. AI can't create anything really new, it's just a rehash from what has already been created.
>t. work with AI
>AI can't replace artists
You sure it can't replace the dozens of generic fotm uninspired hacks?
Yeah sure, the jobs of lesser known artists may be impacted and it'll be harder for new artists to get jobs until they get more skill, that's the worst of it.
>literally the exact same shill posts and images as every other ai thread
>HAHA PHYSICAL LABORERS LOSING THEIR JOBS TO AI LMAOOO!! WAIT AI IS TAKING OVER ART, WRITING AND CODING JOBS??? WTF THIS ISNT SUPPOSED TO HAPPEN TO MEEE!!! I HAVE ALWAYS BEEN AGAINST AI WTF SHUT THIS DOWN RIGHT NOW! PROGRESS IS BAD!!!!
>>HAHA PHYSICAL LABORERS LOSING THEIR JOBS
Artists never acted like this. You're thinking of tech bros and republicans won't pay for welfare or retraining.
t. seething lying archud
Nobody was saying "learn to draw", tho.
I'm gonna say it. I actually really like the look of these pixelated (dot-art) -esque AI art games.
Why do people still reply to these bot threads?
Not everyone just dismisses subjects they don't like as the work of bots I guess
how are you dealing with the mental blow, fellow art sisters?
D-dont worry! Ai is imperfect! Its just a fad and your imagination will always triumph!
Hate this shit, AI is a fucking TOOL, just like fucking PHOTOSHOP. Just tell AI just make something and then YOU, THE ARTIST, fix things and clean it up.
BOOM, your still an artist, you did some work. Stop being a fucking pussy about emerging tech. What, do you want to go back to marble statues that 99.9% of current artists couldn't hope to make look as good as the masters?
>What, do you want to go back to marble statues that 99.9% of current artists couldn't hope to make look as good as the masters?
Yes you fucking moron.
>Just tell AI just make something and then YOU, THE ARTIST, fix things and clean it up.
It would be easier just to design and draw it the right way in the first place.
You say that but you won't post your art because it's shit compared to AI.
Capitalism as you know it won't survive the AI uprising.
If I create something I can copyright it. If fix AI sewage I'm screwed. It's useless. Make a cg back ground with pre made models and a drawn fore ground is the way to go.
Dude, people love drawing and painting. It's not about random images popping out and then you trying to fool people out of their money with them.
if you love drawing and painting, why do you care if other people use AI?
how does it stop you from drawing and painting?
roll
rollan
redeeming
roll
sir
Roll
knknknk
DOUBLE ZERO BABY LETS GO
Good morning Sirs!
CODE RED FELLOW JEETS
AI IS TAKING OUR JOBS
Middle management AI when?
Management is hard to code because you keep having to make branches for every possible contingency.
Good morning sirs.
So where's the games?
>invent AI
>all you can make for profit is coom
>it's probably astroturfed as well
lol
are there a lot of non-porn artists out there that are making a decent living? thats news to me
Comic artists have decent odds because medium is engaging.
people in the 80's thought we'd be on mars by now and all we have is nuns with spoon thumbs
This isn't even an aritical intelligence.
It's a program that got feed billions of images from google.
Think of it like remakes of original images. Why would I consoom remake when the superior original art exists somewhere in the internet?
Software doesn't know how to draw, can't even draw anything original. It copies (inb4 le humans are just fleshly machines by anons who look like soijak irl)
But none of tihs matters. This thread is a bait and OP never did art, coding or even played a video games in 2023.
Another adhd riddled zoomer or manchild looking for attention.
>It's a program that got feed billions of images from google.
and each one of those images has been reduced to less than two bytes of data
the AI creates new images with the patterns it has learned, exactly like "real" artists
tards think it just takes images from google and merges them, but it's literally impossible when it has less than 2 pixels worth of data from those images
I know what a model is thank you.
It still doesn't make my post wrong.
It got feed billion images to make the model get where it is.
>the AI creates new images with the patterns it has learned, exactly like "real" artists
This is straight up dishonest.
and stop calling it AI
>paying for porn
>paying for AI GENERATED PORN
>Soon 90% of jobs will be replaced with basic AI
>Universal basic income will become the baseline
>A lot more people will know the joys of being NEET and able to do what you want all day
>frog
>stupid gibberish
everytime
Sadly lots of people cant cope with neet life. Even 1-2 years under covid was too much for them to handle.
basic income will become the baseline
never gonna be a thing in a capislistic society
My most miserable time period in life was when I was being forced NEET.
No money, broke all the time, couldn't do any cost related activities with my bros.
Coyld barely even afford the alcohol that I used to kill boredom.
Was bored all the time because I was too broke to invest iny hobbies, so all I could do all day was play vidya, binge Anime and get high+drunk.
That was a shitty lifestyle. Working sucks, but at the very least, it makes me appreciate free time enough to make the most out of it. When I was a NEET, every day bled into the next and I actually lost my perspective on time after a while.
Stop lying. You are no more happy as a NEET than I am as a a wageslave because the only way to trully appreciate being NEET is by being a millionaire NEET or one with actual decent income, which is, what? Not even 0.5% of NEETs?
I have a PC with internet connection, enough food to not go hungry and enough money to buy one or two videogames each month.
You don't need more than that to be happy.
>You don't need more than that to be happy.
I actually do. I need projects, I need to create.
For that, you need money.
You're happy? Good for you. I was not.
Flash news: We are not some mass of samefaces who all behave the same, work the same and need the same things. If you are content with complacent consumption, that is great for you. This future was made for you. This future, in contrast, makes me miserable. What good is life without the capacity to explore your potential?
Finished mandatory education and did ten years neet, then after a years employment another 8. Best time of my life and I miss it constantly. All I needed was a PC +internet and that PC can be shockingly shit. I was on a 2007 vista PC until 2018. It ran youtube and emulators for PS1 downwards which was more than enough. Also I dont drink (all alcoholic drinks taste foul) and have NEVER touched drugs. More entertainment than you can consume in 10 lifetimes is available for free and the idea of being so tied to money for hobbies truly baffles me.
That's the difference, I am not looking to be entertained.
I want in life. I am not here to sit around, being hypnotized by screens forever. As minimalist as it is, it killed my mental health. I want to spend my limited time here forging bonds with people and acquiring investments for my future and that of our descendants.
Wageslaving has allowed me to train in a craft that I love, save money to own my own house away from the city far enough in the woods that I have a river going through my land and I have the project car that I have always wanted to own.
Am I materialistic? Hella. I will admit it. I don't want to love life as a minimalist poorfag because, from my experience, no matter what your life is, it's going to be miserable to an extent, so trying to smugly one up eachother over havibg different perspective is both juvenile and pointless.
I focus on what makes me happy and you focus on what makes you happy..All I'm saying is that to appreciate the poorfag NEET life, you need to want veeery very little becausr you really don't get much out of it if you want to be active in your existence.
>he says while sperging out on Ganker
Ok, how is this invalidating my point? You think active people are 24/7 on a schedule? I deserve my day off too gay.
>he says as he trolls on Ganker
we both know you are only doing this because this is the closest thing to genuine human interaction you will get today.
Some people don't have what it takes to be a NEET and need le hustle and bustle of being wageslave cattle. Only normalfags can get bored when given a PC and internet connection. There is so much shit you can do for free or for a small one-time investment.
>finding and watching good movies, shows, anime
>finding and reading good books, manga
>playing or replaying classic vidya
>learning languages
>learning instruments
>learning/playing games like poker or mahjong
>learning coding
>learning to repair electronics to keep your spending down
>learning to draw or paint
>running, calisthenics, training with rings or maybe even a home gym
>stretching yourself to be able to suck your own dick
>going swimming
>cooking and trying new recipes
>planting stuff in your garden/balcony
and thats just from the top of my head, add to that a few good NEET-minded friends and you can do pretty much everything except retarded status circlejerks that normalcattle participates in.
>Has to keep being some divisive gay with his head up his own ass about not working a job.
I could just say you're coping because if you were trully happy, you wouldn't care about how artificially superior it makes you to someone else you don't even know. All I'm saying is I tried it and it didn't work for me so stop selling it as some sort of all around solution towarda happiness.
Especially when your argument is like:
>Only normalfags can get bored when given a PC and internet connection.
That's the mindset of a consoomer cattle. In what right do you call me normalfag cattle when you are content with being plugged on a constant stream of "boredom preventing" garden gnome juice?
>There is so much shit you can do for free or for a small one-time investment
Yes and, then, it gets d and you want to do more. You have to be a fucking fool to think that money is optional to happiness. Even all of these hippies who fucked off to live innawoods in their huts, living their barefoot anti-materialistic vegan lifestyles had a several dozens of thousands of dollar wkrth investment in a proprerty or "house van".
Eveeything cost money, gay. You act smug because you spend less, but you are as dependant on it as every slave in this society. Being NEET is just a different flavor of goy.
>finding and watching good movies, shows, anime
>finding and reading good books, manga
>playing or replaying classic vidya
I already do that. It gets old fast when that's all you do.
>learning instruments
Need money to buy good instruments, which are super expensive
>learning languages
You plateau stupidly early without practice and tuition
>learning/playing games like poker or mahjong
>learning coding
Not interested
to repair electronics to keep your spending down
>learning to draw or paint
>Cheap
Are you out of your fucking mind? My pouch of pencils and alcohol sharpies is worth 300$ and I didn't buy the top brand. Not even close.
UBI isnt going to happen. You and your personal army going to occupy wall street to get change enacted? Youll just end up at your parents house after losing your job. It takes effort to change the system.
It will happen because it has to.
Nope. Someone has to lobby the politicians. It doesn't have to happen at all and a lot of big cities have homeless problems. Wheres the UBI now?
Imagine 1000x homeless.
That's the process. Dozens of extensions, an infinite amount of prompts and configurations, and an infinite amount of models. It's no less complex than traditional art. The product just comes out faster and generally better.
>promptoor
You're a clown.
Stop being mad at a brush, it's weird.
That's exactly what you said.
You're the one who is mad because you're still replying to me. You're not an artist you're a proompter with bad taste.
I'm trolling you and winning internet arguments bro. Don't project, I'm an artist with impeccable taste.
>lol troll u.
I posted less total words so I win.
Im imagining a very large tent city. If it hasnt happened already after Covid taking jobs away then its not going to happen.
I don't live in a 3rd world country (USA), so it will happen. In fact it has basically already happened in my country, and many other European countries.
Is right too, at some point the majority of people are going to lose their jobs to AI and automation.
Something will have to change
Consider what the widespread implementation of automation across the board is going to do to the labor market
Every major company is going to want to embrace such tech to replace large swathes of their workforce...but knowing that the workforce is also their customer base, and that EVERY company will want to do it at the same time, will mean that people everywhere will suddenly not be able to buy their products anymore without the income to afford it
So what do they do to solve for this? Something will have to change, they're not just going to all say no to these innovations.
yeah, youre going to languish in poverty on the grain doll, only useful as cannon fodder in wars, until we get another black plague.
this has all happened before, and will all happen again. dont sleep through school
You don't get it dude. These corpos want to embrace automation, but only to make money, and embracing automation will mean people have no money to give them. Letting everyone starve to death still means no money. At the same time, individual corporations won't pass up automation for their own gain. How to solve this?
So corporations should pay 90% of their profits as taxes to the government instead? Theyll just leave the country.
The only reason rich people are rich is because poor people have a lot less money. If everyone had a lot of money then rich peoples money would be worthless. The poor sacrifice for the rich peoples life style.
There won't be profits, anon. If they automate the whole workforce out of their jobs, and nothing else changes, and everyone starves or whatever, then the widespread automation means they can't make money at all.
>How to solve this?
where did you think nobles and kings and queens came from? that god himself really did descend from the heavens to anoint them? no, dipshit. some people at the top of their totem pole controlled lots of resources, which passed down in inheritance for long enough that they came up with constructs to rationalize it. and because wealth begets wealth, 1% of the people end up controlling 99% of the resources. we're just going back to that
you think they give a FUCK that poorfags don't have money? why? why would they give a fuck? you think the roman nobles were like, oh no, we've gotta invest into this steam engine because it's so important for us that the plebs live decent lives so that they can afford to spend money on useless shit? they DON'T. everybody will get fucking poor, the rich people will live in their mansions with tons of manservants and slaves and mercenaries and other shit to do all the stuff they want to have done. shit moron, you think it's BAD for rich people that everyone else is poor? that's GOOD because then they can hire you to do literally anything for them, and if you piss them off then can just murder you and who's going to do anything about it? you don't have a vote, you don't have money, you have no fucking power whatsoever. you think that's a WORSE outcome for corporations? what do you think corporations are? machines? they're fucking social constructs made up of people, just like all the other constructs. if the abstraction of "the corporation" is destroyed by something that THE PEOPLE who comprise it think is good, then it will be destroyed. corporations aren't real. they don't exist. they're not alive. they don't have genes, their constituent parts don't have shared fate with each other. shit, the people in corporations aren't even fucking related to each other. these are LESS stable constructs than fucking feudal monarchies. they will not be doing ANYTHING to prevent their own destruction
Cool babble bro.
Feudal systems are not a good comparison. For the nobility and royalty, their workforce and their income-sources were the same, the people. We are talking about a paradigm where automation replaces the people as the workforce, but the people are still what they're supposed to look to for income. But now those people can't make money to give them. And they sure can't tax the robots.
>*culls you instead*
what now?
>ai spammer now posting about effort
>noooo someone stole my no work that I did :~~*(
The problem with AI is that it will never look exactly like you see it in your head. Maybe it can come close, but unless you have no imagination at all, it can't replace traditional art.
soon™
reminds me of all the AItards mad at each other for "stealing" their texts
I prefer game engine development in C++ & GLSL that will never make me a single penny.
can this thing draw textures for 3d models already?
Good day, sir.
1. Getting consistent characters with AI is hard as fuck right now even if you train a LoRA or TI on them.
2. I only got a 12gb vram card so I couldn't upscale to a resolution that would be acceptable.
3. Fixing the mess the AI makes is still too much work for me. Models are getting better but there aren't good enough where I would feel comfortable selling AI shit to people yet.
In a year maybe but it's too soon. AI still looks sloppy right now.
If you're making "art" for money then you're not making art anyway. AI obliterates commercial "artists" (twitter drawchuds) but true expressions of art are non-commercial and therefor not effected by AI flooding the market.
This. Although I don't agree with the
>obliterates commercial "artists" (twitter drawchuds)
part.
BABBDI used AI generated assets.
Wow it looks like shit!
Yeah.
did artists react the same way when cameras were invented?
>ai still can’t give anime girls specific tattoos
Trash
>into tats
cringe
Have you tried inpainting? It's also worth noting that some models are better at displaying text than others.
>another thread where the AIfag spams the same shill posts whenever anons start asking for proof of basic functionality
>but I wasted my entire life drawing everything frame by frame!!
>i wasted my entire life working out!!
>i put "effort" in, that means my work is good!
Artcels are fucking finished. What matter is result. If you can prompt a good game, nobody cares if AI made it, and everyone would do it instead of wasting their life drawing. If you could press a button to get an instant fit body to attract women, everyone would do it instead of wasting their life picking up a metal like caveman.
You wasted your life and you are inefficient, youre supposed to work SMART. Not hard
>wasting their life drawing
People draw and paint for the love of creating things and honing their skills.
Just when I thought people couldn't be even more pathetic, there are morons actually paying for Ai shit.
I guess NTR being the single most popular fetish over there makes sense. Actual cuck behavior.
Yeah it's really fucking weird going on a bunch of sites and people offering to run a prompt for the same price of someone drawing art.
It's just art. If you want more you can pay for it.
I added something else in the prompt to add clothing, it's some anon's prompt and it was nsfw :^)
>It's not your art.
Yes it is.
No it isn't. The program made it. You just put in a request.
>you didnt make the art, you just put the paint on a canvas
lol he asked the program do to something. It's not his.
>the pencil made it, you just wiggled it around
This guy gets it.
You already pirate games so this is a fairly moot point. Games getting better in quality while also becoming cheaper is a good thing. Or are you Bobby Kotick?
>>the pencil made it, you just wiggled it around
How did you wiggle around the ai?
I don't pirate games, tard.
Then you're mentally handicapped for wanting games to be expensive lol. Was this really the point you wanted to make?
I never said that, don't put words on my mouth you fucking stupid tard. Ask chatGPT to explain posts before you reply, you brainfried moron.
While I am a big a fan of the breasts depicted in that image, current AI art lacks intent and attention to detail. It can barely make ornamentation and machinery.
>gt 710 2gb
Take a single guess as to why
I make a living making hentai rpg maker games and can't wait for AI to advance further. While people are scared, I see AI as an opportunity to have a whole studio working for me. It will be cool and all to have "standalone" games made automatically, but without any kind of human intervention these things tend to get lost in a sea of generic information. For example, people have endless porn and hentai on search engines, if you type in the keywords you'll get hundreds of thousands of results, but still people are on Patreon and similar sites paying artists. Because having a bunch of information given to you without context is not the same thing as having some sort of relationship with the "artist" you like and trust.
If we get to the point where games are made automatically, that means that someone qualified is going to have the opportunity to create really amazing things. Imagine all of us anons here having digital slaves ready to help us to create our animations, our games, according to our wishes and instructions...
The better Ai gets, the more worthless games will become. There's no money in the future for games.
>There's no money in the future for games
are you implying thats a bad thing?
Good luck trying to sell your ai shit.
Why would I pay for your crap when I can just make it myself?
Because the idea is not to generate AI assets indiscriminately, it's to know how to act as the director of a project and direct the work of your "employees" according to your vision. You will be the project leader using AI to create the part that you aren't competent or don't want to waste time with, while you take care of the experience as a whole and take care of the part where you are proficient.
Of course, for this to become a reality it will still take a lot of time yet. As I always say, we were promised that AIs would make human drivers obsolete... by 2015. The idea that AI will work like a professional is quite naive, for now we are at a "cool tool" level.
Choose one:
>learn a skill such as drawing, 3d, coding, music etc.
or
>spam bait threads about ai singularity for 10 years.
You should be able to solve this.
Anybody here inside the new "closed-gate" Art communities?
I don't like doing timelapses or sharing my work files, but I had to share them to get in. Kinda annoying but worth it honestly, I like discussing process stuff with other artists and most spaces are getting clogged/pozzed/invaded nowadays.
Real artist that make art that's nice, fulfilling and creative are safe.
Porn peddlers are absolutely completely and utterly fucked.
If you sell porn you're about to die of starvation and that makes me beyond elated.
>If you sell porn you're about to die of starvation and that makes me beyond elated.
That's wrong though. Maybe the common peddler, but the big guys have tons of fans and have only gotten bigger since AI cause people like the "real thing".
so, now that we have all this AI shit, when are we getting some good mods for old games like fallout 2, gothic, etc. where the AI voice acting and art can be put to good use?
I like how everyone here is pretending they're artists and still cant draw for shit
The only good thing about these "ai" spamming pajeets is that they have made people hate "ai" and have also gotten "ai" banned from many places.
>ctrl + f pajeet
>9 hits
He's already here.
There is somethings you didn't really realize yet, but AI art has revolutionized Notebook and Journal creation. All the work was with the cover. They were already made with templates, but now AI art means the covers can be made in seconds without real work. It's already having an effect due to how low effort it is and how easy it is to set up, and there are some child book writers that have started talking about it in their facebook groups. The more it's embraced by the average normalfag without them saying it's AI art, the more it slowly takes hold.
I'm just waiting for the game where the story is AI-generated and the art is AI-generated to cater specifically to my tastes. A few years off but it's within reach.
Artistsisters....Hold me..... I'm scared..... These AI nazis are going to kill us..........
Why are artcels racist against Indians?
Indians aren't a oppressed minority.
how do I Begin
https://rentry.org/voldy
thank you
Wow it's crap!
post more comfy art
the dreaded foot witch
Artbros, it's Joever... How can a computer generate such perfect detail...?
What da dog doin'?
I would try it out but im gatekept by the hardware requirements lol
>the retarded Ganker schizo is in the AIshill thread again
AI is going to be phenomenal for learning skills. Imagine having a perfect AI partner that can analyze what you're doing and teach you very specifically where you need to improve with an instrument, or a language, or shit like fighting games/FPS. Being a mid-level artist/musician/writer for money will die out, but the people who keep doing those things as hobbies will be able to make significant advances in self-improvement without needing to pay for books or teachers.
>Ai pixel art
>ダンジョン&ダークネス 大穴と自由の街エルバーン
>https://www.dlsite.com/maniax-touch/work/=/product_id/RJ01018735.html
Interesting
Hijacking this pajeet thread to ask if any of you know some good (real) creature artists to follow on Twatter? I know Nurikabenuri and sinsin
too late, thread is already dead. Here's a freebie for your noble attempt
Artfags need to accept that they are obsolete. You're done. Kaput. You wasted your life. AI is how art will be made moving forward and it will be much faster and better looking than all your years of effort. This is only the very beginning of the new era.
>You wasted your life
But artists are people driven by love and passion for creating things. How is our life being wasted? Is the "ai" going to come to my house to shoot me?
>Is the "ai" going to come to my house to shoot me?
You'll end up doing that yourself when you realize that nobody is paying for your art anymore.
But I have literally never even considered selling or asking money. I love drawing and painting and I do it because I love it.
That's nice to hear, anon. If you don't need art to put food on your table, you'll be fine.
my message is to professional artists who may be trying to get daddy government to make some silly laws. This tech makes the profession obsolete in most cases and they need to accept it. It's just a hobby now.
where do people sell AI art? patreon ?
I won't tell you, since I'm downloading all the AI art posted in this thread to do what I want with. 🙂
>tfw manager at a warehouse
>No risk of ever being replaced like artfags or techfags
Feels good, going to make vidya in my free time with AI tools.
I've actually had an idea for something similar, but can't find a model/lora that does pixel art consistently. No idea how this guy managed it but kudos, the retards thinking this is easy have no clue how AI works.
>Pay 600 for one drawing
>Pay 15 for thousands of drawings
Hmmm..
This mostly just seems to be the end of artists who want to charge outrageous prices. Though probably not considering that they just need people that like THEIR drawings.
Almost every "artist" who seethes about AI art was in it for money. They don't give a shit about "expressing themselves" or "doing it because they love drawing". They were learning to draw because they saw 100$+ commission prices for porn and decided that they want a slice of it.
So every time an "artist" seethes about AI, ask them how much money they were making/planning to make from their art and watch them go on a defense with common buzzwords.
They express themselves by drawing fotm schlop for money. ART
Ignore the seething /ic/ fags. They're coping with becoming irrelevant. All they can do is say AI art looks bad and then go on rants about imaginary indian shills.
But anon, not even /ic/ likes artists. Have you never heard of /ic/ crabs?
I thought the indians were against the AI?
Why do jannies keep allowing these obvious low quality bot threads?
>/ic/ boogeyman
shills on suicide watch already
Seething art critics don't come from /ic/? come on now.
>indian boogeyman
artists on suicide watch already
get your government to spend money on sanitation and sewage treatment.
If all tech is good no matter what, then get yourself a brain chip. It’s the future after all, so you must accept it.
You will never be an artist