Why are you not making bank off of AI generated vidya?

It's easy, just PROOOMPT

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Drill Drill Drill !!
    What is this about?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Oil exploration, obviously.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It's only Sukebei but it's completely shit. Definitely don't recommend it.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      us invasion of iraq

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It's a new Mr. Driller spinoff.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      That's the circle name, idiot.

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Not willing to buy a better GPU, learn stable diffusion, and learn renpy just to sell shit games for 8 dollars,

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      This, imagine learning renpy and then telling your friends "I'm a game dev, I use renpy". Your nerd friends will all give you THAT look, and your programmer friends will also give you THAT look for coding videogames in Python.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I'm not a woman so I don't care about that shit if I'm making a comfortable living off of it.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        oh no, your friends are looking at you?! the horror!!!!

        what are you, a 6th grader? who frickin cares what others think, renpy is fun.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Ganker is mostly underages and it shows

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >adults don't care what people think about them
          Enjoying middle school?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        The only time a programmer would give you THAT look is if you told him you liked working with JS.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Renpy isn't that bad...

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Your nerd friends will all give you THAT look, and your programmer friends will also give you THAT look for coding videogames in Python.
        Very feminine of you to worry about this kind of thing

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      What kind of absolute moron PAYS for AI generated images?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Japs mostly.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        The game attached to the images is actually, surprisingly, very solid. It's a dungeon crawler where you can be raped/rape any female adventurer you come across during your dives. And/or brainwash/frick them hard enough to join your party

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          could you link a video?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        What kind of absolute moron PAYS for images in general?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          see

          Japs mostly.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >"man why is there so much furry and NTR art online but not for my much more sophisticated fetish?"
          >"what? pay for images? lol, lmao even"

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            so, morons?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Realistically, well done AI generations are indistinguishable from the "real" images as far as anime is concerned if you put the effort in.

        No, I'm not talking about morons on twitter posting images of women with hands growing out of their mouths and four legs going "OMG ITS LIKE REAL LIFE ITS OVER FOR FEMOIDS!!!" and making AI look bad, the chances are that you've fell for AI images without realizing it already.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          The reason it's hard to distinguish AI images is because our brains see what they want to see. We don't notice the little AI imperfections unless we look for them, and unless we suspect that it's AI generated we don't. You only notice AI generated images at a glance if you've played around with it yourself.
          However, if you've manually edited them to do stuff like removing nonsensical patterns, editing proportions, fixing fingers, fixing eyes and lines that go nowhere, then good fricking luck.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          yeah, maybe if just give it only a quick glance or you're a pajeet, you might fall for it, but AI stuff is still very distinguishable, and will probably always be since it's a limitation of how a language model works. maybe one day we'll have an AI generate perfect and unique replicas of human works but the current model ain't it. you're falling for the hype of yet another silicon valley investment pit.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Nah, people enjoy the AI art creations and they're all free to generate with stable diffusion so they're here to stay, I'm not talking about investing in anything the AI art tech is not investable since anyone can do it for themselves with SD

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              people enjoy it in the way of "look mum the computer farted out an image, isn't this amazing". no one is actually gonna pay for half-assed AI generated work, which is all it matters.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Tell me how OP does look like AI

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              dude look at this shit. it can't even properly do pixel art. the pixel size is all over the place. it looks like a fricked up upscale. not to mention all the other glaring artifacts. these took me a few seconds to spot. google 集中搾精治療室 爆乳ナースと連続絶頂射精治療 and see for yourself

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                looks better than most pixel art hentai games. I will never understand the AI hate.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                that's because you're dumb

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Bro I've already seen AI works that look like real photos, where try as hard as I might, I can't see any clear discrepancies

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              okay pajeet. try and make money with it or present it as a serious work to an audience with a brain. come back to us with the results.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >the chances are that you've fell for AI images without realizing it already.
          You shills always say this.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          If it's good enough to fool me I don't care if it's AI generated tbh

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >the chances are that you've fell for AI images without realizing it already.
          AI images are always painfully obvious, even img2img is easy to spot if you're familiar with the original image

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      bump

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >doesnt tag as AI generated
      So what now?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        fission mailed

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Use your damn eyes for once.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          The only issue with AI art are hands and other niche things
          How will you notice such things when you can easily inpaint them at any time or use AI to generate the base piece and then manually touch it up yourself?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            there are many little details and patterns that are extremely easy to recognize in AI, if you can't recognize it instantly you simply don't have working eyes

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >you simply don't have working eyes
              They usually work well for most people, the issue is the growing lack of empathy from younger people which makes them unable to relate to art as a form of expression rather than a piece of instant gratification which can only be evaluated on a functional scale of how fast it takes to be produced and how much instant gratification you can get from it(and possibly sell it)

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              There are not. Sure there are little things that AI does, but artists do it as well. Just like the hands people mention same with feet, you have artists who make a great image and then frick up those.
              Also you sound like the redditor who insisted that something is AI made since he can "just see the AI style", but got proven wrong.over and over again.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Sure there are little things that AI does, but artists do it as well
                No shit sherlock, it's almost like it produces nothing on its own. Also there is a very distinct lighting issue with AI art as well which is even more noticeable than thumbs and toes.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >distinct lighting issues
                From what i have seen it is just hit or miss with lighting. Sometimes it gets it other times it whiffs. Then again its literally the same with artists. So my question to you is, what are you comparing the AI art too?
                A custom comission worth thousands of $ by an artists that had to work his whole life to get to that point, or to the average artist who is going to be charging 3 digits tops.
                You can try squirming and convincing yourself otherwise, but AI will absolutely obliterate the landscape of artist jobs. Some might end up being better off after it, but the vast majority is getting proper fricked.
                Just look at the complaints people had about it 2 years ago compared to today, hell look at 1 year ago compared to today. The improvements are insane, and with art, you have diminishing returns when it comes to accuracy. Since nobody actually does light right when it comes to art, there will always be a little artistic freedom in the name of making it look good, because the living artist can't put in 1000 hours to perfect reflected light in an image someone is paying 200$ for. The AI does not have that limitation tho, so it will produce a better product for the $. And that is the bottom line. Is it a $ driven market? Well the ai will fricking dominate it, is it a sentimentality driven one or anything not measurable with $? Well then you need to capitalize on that angle or the AI will just do it more efficiently.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Just look at the complaints people had about it 2 years ago compared to today, hell look at 1 year ago compared to today
                This is the usual pajeet cope, believing there are no restrictions to their magical tech which doesn't has the ability to think like human a does. AI art has and will always have uncanny aspects to it which gives a feeling of "something off" but don't you worry I'm on your side, modern art and the younger genetically fricked up + covid ptsd generation won't have the ability to tell it so it'll pass off as the new norm, add that to the fact that everyone just thinks off in terms of how much money they can make off something and how much they can tingle their ego by producing something with minimal effort that would actually require some degree of mastery and it's obvious that art as a form of expression is dead, this souless way to express how much of a cog you are IS the new expression. People using AI as a basis and tracing/altering stuff will also exist but that has nothing to do with the discussion.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                The whole point of this tech is that it takes the input from humans on several layers into account. Not only the prompts, you can also plug in outside help like the guy with 3d models has shown that you can use to fine tune posing, but the fact that it is using human drawn art as a base in itself means that it is using human sensibilities.
                And guess what, the sheer fact that a human puts in the prompts means that the same human checks the image and either generates a new one, or saves/fine tunes what he got. It literally took a few years to go from barely recognizable scribbles to making uncanny replicas of literally any style. Throw hissy fits all you like, but welcome to the industrial revolution 2.0. You are a fricking weaver watching Cartwright create his power loom.
                >but it can't detect mistakes
                >but it can't adjust this and that
                While you are literally watching it improve month by month.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                You're delusional.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Leave the duck nuns out of this

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                The AI didn't.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >industrial revolution 2.0
                >drawing
                >the same as being a cog in a factory.
                It's okay you also don't understand the implications of killing yet another way to express yourself in a decaying society that glorifies laziness and that's okay, dying in a zoomer hellscape while being part of the problem is a fitting end for you.

                >i-i-it has no limitations
                It sure does, it's just not relevant because it's intended audience has the same empathy as an AI does.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                there are plenty, AI makes mistakes in a way that is very specific to AI, hands, hair tips, eyes, clothing all have that AI quality.
                there was some "AI or human test" trending around and i got full score because its so fricking easy to recognize if you have working eyes

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        i will use my ai to find ai generated images

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          What if I train an AI to produce works that evades the detection of your AI meant to find AI works?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            if it's closed source then you can't automate your ai training

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Simple. Report you so you're one step closer to getting your account permabanned. If you can be spiteful, so can I.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        You aigays are like troons. You keep acting like people can't naturally tell.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      As an artist, it's a shame seeing AI art on there. I thought they were more honorable than that.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        It's mostly chinks and k*reans flooding the site.
        They have no honor as they are not even human.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Stay mad artgay

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I bet your "art" is complete crap

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          But anon, AI art isn't good either. It's like a Bigmac. It's "good enough".
          Comparing artists who strive to be better to AI which will forever produce "good enough" for the plebs is pointless. Neither sides have the same objective.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        plenty of soulless tech accelerationists out there. it's not just jeets

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          I’m waiting for them to start shilling brain chips en masse

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >As an artist
        That sounds so last century.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      If I made a porn game like a VN I would probably use AI for backgrounds. Better than using real world pictures and putting a filter on it.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        There are stock VN backgrounds sold for pennies.

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    all those 5 stars? all me.

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    the one you posted were fixed by actual artist.

    same with that dicky CG images collection.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >same with that dicky CG images collection

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Honestly I think that's the best way to go about it. Use the AI as a baseline, then touch up the image yourself and make it yours.

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    still not easy enough. It has to be as easy as "make art assets for new game in the style of Clymenia, include boob enlargement scene"

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Well at least they're priced right if they aren't short as frick

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    How do you get an AI to generate an entire game? I can picture it making a bunch of stuff for the game, and even coding parts of it, but surely you'd need a human to actually assemble it and proof the code etc.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      You don't. You get it to generate enough to trick morons into going wow look at this without looking into it. Then you run with the money.

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    What kind of absolute moron PAYS

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I have dignity and self-respect.

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >to have male MC games that aren't cuck games you have to rely on AI
    Grim

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      thanks god artists aren't needed anymore

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I don't know how to

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Are those actually AI generated?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I checked and there's an explicit tag for AI generated content. It is AI the creator just touched up on it and threw it in a pixelization filter. It's way more obviously AI in his earlier game that one on the right.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah I looked it up kinda fricked up but I guess most artists trace shit anyway so Ai isn't much different

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    the same morons that fell for crypto and NFT, now think that an overglorified search engine will be tool to finally make them rich. most of them are brown people, so I don't feel too bad about it.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      When you realize that in India, the average yearly age is around 2k USD, anything quick and easy is needed.

      Alright frick it.
      Give me a deep, and I do mean 'deep', rundown on how to properly shill your game (good websites, social marketing, whatever). nodevs and literalwhos need not apply, I need expert opinions here.

      Youtube marketing, use music you published since you get money from that along with the ad being played.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Youtube marketing, use music you published since you get money from that along with the ad being played.
        Unfathomably cunning anon and, dare I say, based.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          You pay a couple of pennies for each ad, if somsone watches the full ad which has a full song, you get some of it back. But if it's only the first five seconds viewed, you only get 1/10 of a penny.

          AI art is non copyrgihtable right? When the hell is someone gonna use the AI to generate RPGM tilesets and spread it because I'm absolutely sick of seeing the default ones

          Yes, also there isn't anybody can do if you claim it isn't AI since there is no way to identify AI works outside of the fricked up parts, which can be edited out. Basically AI art that is really good and sometimes edited can pass as real art for most people, and some people will accept certain types of flaws since it is common.

  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    AI or not, the game on the left is neat from what I grasped when trying it out but I can't read Japanese, translation when?

  17. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Alright frick it.
    Give me a deep, and I do mean 'deep', rundown on how to properly shill your game (good websites, social marketing, whatever). nodevs and literalwhos need not apply, I need expert opinions here.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      just make a thread on Ganker with links mods don't care about blatant advertising apparently

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        True, good suggestion. They're usually too busy jerking off to bait threads or banning offtopic but actually ontopic discussions to care.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      just make a playable demo and hope anons get erect while playing

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Be honest and show gameplay (if applicable). A demo would be the best.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >spoonfeed me

      How about you jump off a bridge?

  18. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    looked at the previews of those. Not even worth a pirate.

  19. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    AI art is cheap. you can only make chink tier VN with it. it however might still be better than amerimutt tumblr woke trash.

  20. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Good idea for background content.

    the problem of VN and other RPG is the lack of CG for side characters who break the immersion.

    if AI is used outside the main content to create a better enviroment then the product quality will be good tier

    instead if is used to reduce the production, aka if is used to avoid and reduce working then the result will be shit.

  21. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    AI art can't draw hand-ACK

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah the memes about hands have already become outdated
      This shit works fast

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >all AI art looks sam-ACK
        not my problem, take 5 - 15 pictures of artist's artstyle I like, feed it to LoRA trainer, 30 minutes later artstyle copied
        >its copyright infringement
        artstyle is not copyrighted, not my problem

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          what site is that?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Looks like civitai

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >AI can only copy what it saw, it can't improvise/reimagine things, your artstyle is stuck in helltaker character-ACK
          false, AI can transfer artstyle u trained on to any character and any environment, and you can mix LoRA's. Create LorA for hoe-girlve fubuki character, create lora for helltaker artstyle
          >prompt: fubuki hoe-girlve, helltaker artstyle,

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >actually looks like that vtuber that i dont know much about

            [...]
            AIchad won

            >actually looks like that pokemon girl with the weird half bald hairstyle
            I remember some anon telling me that AI couldn't do specific characters. Frick it really is over isn't it.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Cute fox wife but…

            >ear cropped off

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >Fubuki in Helltaker artstyle
            Alright, I'm kinda hyped, but it sure feels like a monkey paw.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          AI art can't draw hand-ACK

          AIchad won

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          do you not see that giga thumb on the right hand anon

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah the memes about hands have already become outdated
      This shit works fast

      Doesn't anyone else find it scary how fast AI art is improving?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Doesn't anyone else find it scary how fast AI art is improving?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        No, I don't get scared by technology being effective, because I'm not a moron

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          When AI reaches the point where it can improve itself without human input, we will achieve the technological singularity and there's no telling what could happen then.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            And how do you suppose the current machine learning programs pick up that skill?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Tom homosexual

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          but you are a moron with narrow scope
          AI will be used for totalitarian control over population

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Are you scared of cameras too then?

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              He is right tho. The fact that these tools are so availible only means that more rights will be willingly given over by the majority. You will require an ID to access the internet, because muh AI spook. Just like how they tried and actually succeded during the covid crysis to normalize tracking citizens in quite a few countries. Because of this AI shit, things are gonna get a looooot worse for a lot of people.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                No bro you don't have to think about the implications of AI art used against you or the long term consequences of it in culture, just produuuuuuuuuuce and frick artgays frfr.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            taking Roko's basilisk into account
            I, for one, welcome our new AI overlords

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >AI will be used for totalitarian control over population
            so nothing will change?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >AI scares the manchild who dislikes modern technology
          when will this balding baby frick the hell off. He routinely has braindead take after braindead take.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            If u watch the video its not AI that scares him, but the fact a complex language prediction pattern is indisdinguisable from a human even if you're aware its AI
            What "scares" him is that we might not be anything more than fleshy pattern machines and surprises is just our algorithm failing

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >he didn't see the video
            Implying he isn't right. You already have people using really shitty AI voice generated clips to scam people. There was the whole Joe rogan supplements shit wasn't there? Where someone used a really badly generated voice of him endorsing some pajeet product. Shit is gonna get wild in the comming years.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >just think of the dummies who will get scammed!!!
              as if that isn't already the case with the internet in general. This is only a problem for morons who can't tell the difference or have even a modicum of suspicion/doubt

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        exponential growth
        eventually, AI will be able to introduce output into itself as training
        then explosive ai growth will ensue through self-improvement cycles, each one shorter than the last
        this will not be limited to images
        technological singularity

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          How, exactly, do you intend to define "improvement" to the AI?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            if you're capable of defining improvement then so can the AI

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              AI is sovless

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                you are soulless, i am soulless, everything is soulless because soul doesn't exist

                AI can't make anything new because it has to check from it's work from the source data.

                just like the human brain
                just give it internet access, boom, here's your data

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >just like the human brain
                If it's just like the human brain then how did new styles evolve? Also, no one knows how the human brain works. And don't say LOL IT'S JUST NEURAL NETWORKS because that's just a crude over simplification.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                everything comes referencing already existing things, or mix and matching existing ideas/concepts, nothing is originial because from the day we are born we are bo,barded with data from all our senses, we see colors and images, we hear sounds and music, we smell, we taste, we touch and feel, all of that hoes into the brain database and is later used as reference whenever we trycreating something "new" but even the simple act of creating is already an unoriginal thought imparted onto us by our enviroment through preception
                extract the 5 senses of a fetus and all that remains inside the mind is an empty void no matter how long you wait

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                AI can't make any new styles because it has to check the data it already has.
                > nothing is originial because from the day we are born
                That's amazing. Is that we still just make cave paintings? You're an idiot.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >anon mad that a program specifically created for pattern recognition and image generations following said patterns aren't creating new patterns of its own
                i mean, it's not that that the AI cannot generate its own original style (you can just feed it its own generated data) its that we specifically designed it not to because that's not what we want ai to do

                plus, our current image generators really only have data about pixels and their relationships to other pixels, you can't expect it to reproduce things from the real worls properly when the only data it has about the world are just pictures and words related to them

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                It can't generate it's own style because it has to check against the data it already has if it drew the right thing.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                what, you think it can just magically generate data out of nothing that somehow perfectly represents something existing in our world when it has no fricking information to work with? i mean, even humans would find it hard to draw something they do not know and be expected to come up with something that has no relation to even a single piece of data they already recognize, and even then its an unfair analogy because adult (or even child) humans already have many years gathering and collecting data from a variety of inputs and has been interacting with them and have been doing so all the time since their birth while these algorithms only get pixels and words to go along with them. if a human makes an error in their art, they can usually just check their references or see if it matches up with previous information they know of from gathering said references. art styles themselves are not wholly novel either, its a mix of what you already know, what you want to capture, and how you draw. you could have literally made better arguments than this, like arguing how current ai models still suffer from not understanding how hands work and how letters should be shaped and arranged into, or how it is unethical that they're scraping data from artists without their permission, or whether or not it is legal to sell something that's generated by an AI

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Again if think humans worked like that we'd never get past cave paintings. Thanks for the essay.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >misunderstanding the point
                anon, the reason why human art has progressed beyond cave paintings is exactly due to the three factors i've stated earlier. caveman art began as a way to represent the world using what they have, and when agriculture became a thing, people could spend more time making art using newer tools they've developed and find better ways to represent the world around them, and the more they did it the better they became at it. they developed symbols that they came to associate with different things, but those symbols obviously came from something that already exists in the real world.

                what i'm saying is that you're literally saying that ai can't generate novel art styles because it has to cross-reference it with the patterns of data it had already recognized despite the fact that humans also cross-reference patterns of data it had already recognized and stored into their memory in combination with the medium they are working with and what they want it to look like to create new art styles. there is still cross-referencing involved.

                image generators are perfectly capable of generating their own novel art styles, the problem is that the patterns it might recognize and generate would make no sense to us because the ai 'experiences' the world in a fundamentally different way than humans and thus derive entirely different patterns from them.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Literally any time you prompt any existing art style it is creating a new art style because what it knows of that art style is merging with the model's own in-grained art style.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                You don't have a point you're being so vague that what you're saying is meaningless.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >It can't generate it's own style
                I'll never understand how dumb you have to be to think this.

                1+2=3. Anime+Realism=new artstyle also ayyylmao

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Wow it looks like ass. Good job.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Naturally, but it's still a new art style and AI has made millions of new artstyles that way.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Anime with slightly smaller eyes. Good job.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                That AI "draws" boobs better than Oda.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >fricks up drawing one of the most popular female anime characters

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                its literally better than what you see in one shit nowadays

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I like the 'e' tattoo on her right boob.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                It's fricking L with breasts la dee da

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >i am soulless
                ok bot

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                you are an organic machine programmed by evolution and learning to respond to external stimuli in specific ways and there's nothing you can do to prove me wrong

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                you're an idiot, no proof required

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              AI can't make anything new because it has to check from it's work from the source data.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      They also can't do proper lighting but who cares, you're a bugman either way.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Those hands are wrong?
      Are you moronic?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >can't draw hand-ACK
      >posts picture where the AI gives extra joints to fingers
      What does he mean with that? This anon trully is mysterious.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        ,..thats how my hands look

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          I bet women would love your fingers

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Now look at those fricked up eyes.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Both of those hands have extra jointed fingers and floating separated thumbs. And even if the hands were decent, the eyes and ear are still fricked up and garbled.

  22. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    damn they've made over 181397 dollars after the dlsite cut

  23. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    AI art is good and here's why

  24. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    this is the best guide for the best anime version & models

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I dont have a rich pc tho. and collab is limited
      any good pages in there?

  25. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Unironically, it's faster and cheaper to use AI art in other ways. Some stuff is so low effort that 90% of the time it takes to do is the time to upload templates and get it approved. Video games are very complex and require a lot of moving parts. Many other things do not.

  26. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >You can't use AI to generate specific poses/situatio-ACK
    false, controlnet can be used for that, if you need high fidelity you can use blender to generate controlnet pose data

    clock is ticking artcels, tick tock

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Is that blender?
      link to the pose model(s)?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        https://toyxyz.gumroad.com/l/ciojz

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          nice
          thanks

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >all that complicated work to get something that doesnt look the way i want it
      ok

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Those look fricking magnificent.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      based but the first picture still looks like shit anatomically

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      https://toyxyz.gumroad.com/l/ciojz

      at that point you're just an artist with a different set of tools

  27. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    i think this AI shit just prove how low effort most art is

  28. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    AI art is non copyrgihtable right? When the hell is someone gonna use the AI to generate RPGM tilesets and spread it because I'm absolutely sick of seeing the default ones

  29. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >artists mock coders for decades
    >anyone can learn to code but art requires skill and talent
    >chuds rise up and make artists obsolete
    its over

    yes artists can't be fully replaced but with the speed of AI art generation advancements, artists are no longer able to leech 1800$ or more from commisions

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      wake me up when it can draw anything other than boring hyperrealism and animeslop

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        If you are one of the premade models, you can ask it to draw a certain artist's style. Thomas Kinkade is goyslop too, but you get what I'm saying.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I think I saw someone made pc98 style Lora.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        skill issue, learn to use LoRAs/finetuning

        [...]
        What generator is this? New SD branch or Midjourney?

        regular sd with controlnet extension and LoRA extension

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >regular sd
          ...so then this shit is only compatible for paypigs using the censor'd generator. Cool cool.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      https://toyxyz.gumroad.com/l/ciojz

      What generator is this? New SD branch or Midjourney?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      is that why you spam? just impotent seethe?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Anyone can learn to draw. Unless you have Parkinson's or don't have hands, I suppose.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Anyone can learn to draw. Unless you have Parkinson's or don't have hands, I suppose.
        Actually...

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          The character designer for Rumble Roses also drew with his mouth

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      can learn to code but art requires skill and talent
      Why is this the go to for AIPajeets? Can they really not spend some time off their day to draw something? I'm not a good artist, but even I do that.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Proooompters are not coders you fricking moron

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I can't wait for AI to produce expressive ahegaos/nhogaos like those created by takeda and akatsuki giken
      It's good to be alive bros.

  30. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I don’t want to use AI
    I like making things myself and I don’t think it can make my rpg since it will be a text based game inspired by the likes of Conan, farfhd and the gray mouser, thieves world, etc. aka an actual rpg and not coomer slop for the dregs of society.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It's sad to think storytelling a decade from now will be workmates telling you about their personalized fantasy part-scifi melodrama they've been watching/reading that's totally unique to them while you wonder if tonight's the night you take an AI porn plunge or swallow buckshot.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Yes it’s sad to think that humanity will become a bunch of lotus eaters however I don’t think it likely to happen this century. A personalized book simply wouldn’t provide the same level of engagement.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          A lot of shit will happen after than you think with current technological progressions. There will probably be a second full on cold war before anything major.

  31. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >lmao just learn to code
    >OMG NOT LIKE THIS I'M GONNA STARVE

  32. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    artist gets too lazy to draw,
    trains AI on his own art then generates drawings instead

    oh no no

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Those don't look alike at all though

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >search up this thread expecting artist seethe
      >both the comments and QRT's are instead filled with bugmen shills
      ebic

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >load up AI with drawings from my favorite porn artist
      >Proompt my commissions instead of paying for them
      Is this unironically possible already?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Seems like it yea. The more effort you put in the better the results as well and its only getting better by the day.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Kinda. LoRA is pretty powerful although it is not one click wonder.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Yah, that's pretty much what a lora does, you'll train it with a few images on top of an existing, larger model.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >my style
      genuinely cannot wait for AI to become prevalent enough to put morons out of business who genuinely believe they are unique. Any skilled artist can replicate any "style", a style is not unique to a person ffs.

  33. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The only reason to be against AI is because the creators are the "you will own nothing and be happy" bugmen

    but other than that AI is a fun tool.

  34. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >tfw my brain is beginning to recognize AI images instinctively at a glance
    it might be as good as my israelite detector yet but it's getting there

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >see israelite in real life
      >AI detector goes off

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Detecting things that are fake, uncanny, and deformed are part of our natural instincts.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      take the AI art test and come back
      you wont because your score will be shit

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Link it

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdhEpBRnOwiFI-ieNKKu3Y0KcoFbd_ZWod1LeyoV6EEfY78HA/viewform?fbclid=IwAR1BAm3NlDcAkqwgjJAO3MCgw6K-bCTYD1KMTsPtQ6iFWOSprgouYrQL0IE
          https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdROAyDiRLJ5oPbZIOL3ImpHpk1KQnxcUyq0wVFA2GVhEjcDQ/viewform?fbclid=IwAR03TcSb8iDassYzTvmHrA_2bttMIVWdlBDZ02y_F0Zgbm4DqtcNbt7kZJE

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Mostly right

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            45/45
            43 were easy as shit, the other 2 just took a few more glances than usual.
            Anybody who can't get at least 40 of this right has some serious cognitive issues.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              44/45
              too easy, AIshills killing themselves

              I got 44 out of 45 right. You'd have to be near blind to get more than a couple of these wrong.

              >3 bot responses minutes after a genuine response got btfo
              lol. At least try with inspect element screenshots

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >bot responses
                That's a lot of seethe.

                39/45
                Doesn't help that my wrong ones were human ones.
                Now use one that isn't just filled with generic images to favor the ai

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            44/45
            too easy, AIshills killing themselves

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            I got 44 out of 45 right. You'd have to be near blind to get more than a couple of these wrong.

  35. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    remember paying 100$ to artists for heckin animu twitch emotes, not anymore

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I don't remember paying for anything twitchtard related ever.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Don't check out fiverr, the average person pays 20 dollars for it.

  36. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Thomas Kinkade is the unironic goyslop of the art world. He created the art equivalent to Mcdonalds, forced many people to loose their own local businesses and made really generic art to undersell to be made in puzzles for the general market.

    Ultimately, he was very talented, but his art represents instant gratification. The colors used and the normalized settings isn't about thinking about the art, but looking at it instantly to get a warm fussy feeling. He did everything he could to mass market his paintings for mass appeal over being thoughtful.

    This AI image has the style used for a factory, ultimately a deeper exploration of art, mocking Kinkade generic and fussy style with adding something darker and deeper about the mass production of it. It can also be used against AI art as well, with the mass production and gratification of instant art.

    It is also ironic and funny that goyslop artists AI art is trained to be the best with the most, due to the abundance of the art and how the official pre-models take any image from the internet, even if it shows up multiple times.

  37. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Steal the pixel-art checkpoint database someone posted a while back
    >Make lots of anime booba
    I approve and wish I had the drive to do something like this.

  38. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    There's more to drawing then just money. I do it cuz its fun and rewarding. Nothing else compares to it.
    You do you, but if you do art for only money you're gonna burn out or get bored fast

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      that butt though

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      post more

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >I do it cuz its fun and rewarding. Nothing else compares to it.
      It's not like anyone is stopping you. Just because industrial processes exists doesn't mean that people are no longer allowed to make things by hand.

  39. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Can't draw
    >Make art by photoshopping a bunch of reference images together
    >Trace the outlines
    >Fill in the details by drawing on a raster
    I've been doing the same exact thing the AI does but by hand and with much more control
    This shit is so overblown tbh

  40. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    DLsite and Fanza is banning low effort AI shit so you tech c**ts will still need to hire a real artist to fix your shit art. Better start sucking dicks again

  41. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Why are these threads always made by butthurt morons?
    Just make shit if it is so good, why bother reposting the same shit over and over again if artists are done for and all that drivel.

  42. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >8.88$
    >over 28k sells
    If you take away 30% thats still 19161,53$. Crazy

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      deleted an 2 its 191261,53

  43. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    In the future, people will be able to upload an old doujin or hentai, strap on a VR helmet and an AI will recreate the exact same scenario and sensations.
    You're going to be dead or too old to enjoy it though because laws and the current generation in charge will do their best to suppress AI development.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      We are close to being able to feed an AI with stories from our favourite doujin artist,
      Feed another with their art
      And have AI fully produce doujins in the style of a specific mangaka.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >You're going to be dead or too old to enjoy it though because laws and the current generation in charge will do their best to suppress AI development.
      Because at some point you cancerous AI Fanbois are going to shit up entire markets with your Cheaply made AI slop in an Attempt to make a quick buck that people will will decide it is a Liability to give you gays any platform at all.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        like it happened when automation replaced manual labor right?
        or are artists just THAT special?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >the act of drawing/producing art is the same as being a cog in a factory.
          Not a surprising statement, how old are you again?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            i mean, if you're doing it for money... yeah, it pretty much is

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        It's growing pains. Yes I'm also sick of morons dumping 500 variations of the same pic on pixiv/boorus, but at some point things should settle down, novelty will wear off and people will try to push AI standards even further.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        i mean, isn't the current art market oversaturated with coomershit anyway? people just mass producing slop for a quick buck, at least image generators are capable of doing things other than porn, so i don't see the problem here

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          If the material produced reflects the desires of the people, why would AI produce anything else?
          There’s SFW and NSFW artists, I expect the split between those for AI users to be much the same.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            It's so good bro. Watch out artists.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              You just know one of these frickups is gonna give someone a never-before-seen fetish.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                In the future people are gonna project 10000 AI generated porn pics in their retina over 5 minutes and they will convulsively orgasm at the end.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                This is what tripping on DMT feels like.

                t. knower

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              I can't quite figure out what's going on, but this still activated the neuron. Makes me think of what Zach Hadel said in an interview about AI generated movies in the future.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >AI will never take our jobs we are just too good at it

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Comparing cherry picked still frames of flavor of the month weeb slop
                Will you ever argue in good faith?
                As a matter of fact, isn't weeb slop exactly what you love? Why shit on one slop and praise the other?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Meanwhile you are totally not cherry picking from a failed generated prompt. Oooook. You are definitely right. AI will never reach these peaks. AI gays on suicide watch, amright?!

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                That's CG, stupid.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                All AI images are computer generated, you idiot.

                Nope, my argument is simply that this debate in itself is fricking moronic. Clearly artists and slop eaters will never be on the same page, so why even try to one up eachother? You will never argue in good faith. You will never actually "win".

                Why not just eat your slop and stop pretending we live in the same world?

                No, producers of an expensive good and consumers of an expensive good will never be on the same page when the expensive good gets a cheap alternative of equal quality. Ofc no fricking artist that takes art seriously enough for it to be his job will be happy that there is now out there a program that does his job in a fraction of a second. Oh no its only 95% as good as what the artist does... well shit the artist will need days if not weeks to produce images with high detail, the AI takes minutes. So its a no brainer for any artist, or aspiring artist to hate it.
                And ofc every consumer will absolutely love it. Are you saying i don't have to hope that my favourite artist opens comissions so i can pay him 600$ for a colour sketch that he will deliver in a week... i can just get the AI generate 50 images in an hour?
                Geeeee, i wonder why those 2 groups are not on the same page.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >All AI images are computer generated, you idiot.
                Yeah and they suck. moron.

                you are an organic machine programmed by evolution and learning to respond to external stimuli in specific ways and there's nothing you can do to prove me wrong

                Ok genius. Give us a complete model of human consciousness. Then go get your nobel prize.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Ummm is she doing the air handjob thing?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                all im saying is, there's no proof we all aren't just tricking ourselves into believing that we are capable of "deeper thought" and thus the human mind is no different from a computer

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                That's great moron. You're the on telling us in a really vague way that were just a "machine". That's meaningless. It helps no one to be reductive.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                how do you feel about the fact that computers are digital and brains are analog? I feel like this is a small difference that makes up for fundamental changes.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous
              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Exactly my point. Creative people and consumers will never agree wuth eachothet because one wants to be spoonfed while the other is the giver. I don't do art for money so I am not seeing AI as competition, but if anything, AI shows just how utterly unappreciative and entitled consumers really are and that does bother me on a personal level sometimes.
                Good for you if you can get AI slop. That's all you deserve anyways because you have never appreciated the production process behind whatever you shove down your face.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                people want results
                they dont care if you "wowked weawwy hawd" on your doodles

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >people want results
                "Hello, anon. This is your boss. We have a new mascot for our company. Can you generate the design wearing a cowboy hat and a police uniform that fits the style by the end of the afternoon? Thanks."

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                No, consumers want results. Creators are in love with the process.
                It's only bad for those who rely on their talent to get paid, but for anyone else, it's showing the bitter truth that it really isn't worth it to do art for money because your customerbase is uneducated and entitled.

                In the end, the AI split is a good thing. Artists return to purity and are no longer shackled to the peasants that made their livelyhood.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                thats the biggest cope i've ever seen. yeah i'm sure artgays are way excited to do their art for free while going back to doing whatever shitty 9-5 they were using art to escape.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Every transitional process will be difficult, but you have to look on the long term.
                Slop NPC get their automatically generated BigMacs abd they get fat on the israelite juice.
                Meanwhile artists can do business with people who actually appreciate human effort and are willing to pay mire per commission because of the niche or potential investment.
                The mold didn't kill sculptors, it pnly made them niche enough to sell to bourgeoisie.

                There is nothing bad in this outcome. Everyone get what they want.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Best for me; i can make MY ideas and not have to pay. Stupid shit with ITS STEALING MY ART TO STUDY AND LEARN. Frick you, anyone can do that, its how HUMANS LEARN. But tiny bits of MY ART is inside the AI art.

                How? How is your art inside it? Frick off.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Learn english please.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >i can make MY ideas and not have to pay
                Ideas such as?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                big ditty anime girl

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >i can make MY ideas and not have to pay
                And what exactly are your ideas?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >NOOOO MUH LABOR THEORY OF VALUE MUH COMMUNISM NOOOOOO

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Not him but i value effort. Stone henge could be built in a day with 1 guy and a crane. I dont pay for commissioned art anyways but if i found out i paid for prompted art id demand a refund. Its a lot less impressive.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                People want good and varied results catered to their specific requests. AI shit can't even do the basics.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >unappreciative

                the appreciation was in the money you were paid moron. we're not friends, we're customers, artists don't exactly do anything for free out of the kindness of their own hearts.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                And the moment the cheaper alternative emerges, the customerbase vanish like ghosts.
                No loyalty whatsoever. You never appreciated the work. The only reason you paid at all was because you had no other choice.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >You never appreciated the work. The only reason you paid at all was because you had no other choice.

                yes. thats the free market for you. why exactly are artists owed loyalty again? are artists and their customers friends now or something?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                That is why maming art for money is a miserable life. You're better to find a niche of people who really appreciate your craft instead of chasing gold.

                The tech industrial path will always be the wisest path for money since free market is entirely dependant on tech progress. This is why I work as an electric technician and do art mostly as a hobby and sell maybe one or two commissions a year for pocket money to people who want a tattoo or a banner/logo for their project.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >You never appreciated the work.
                Neither do you, you just like to claim you do.
                At the end of the day, you want results, be it in either entertainment or day to day shit.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Anon, I am the one creating the art. How could I not be appreciative of the process when I subject myself to it for hours on a regular basis. This is the difference between creative types and consoomer cattle. You get everything for as cheap as possible and with as little output on your part because you feed yourself short term dopamine.
                Creation is long term dopamine. It's like growing a tree or raising a child. It's all long term wffort and investment and that is where the pride comes from.
                Someone who cycles through brands and products to get high for a moment will never understand this.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Anon, I am the one creating the art.
                Present it.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                So that you can just say "HAHA NGMI" in a very desperate and vain attempt to demoralize me? Fat fricking chance. Been there, done that.
                Just know that in any other thread, I got nothing but praise everytime I posted my art. Only in those threads full of AI goblins slop addicts have I ever gotten negative feedback for posting my art. This is proof in itself that you are dishonest and only out there to one-up me.

                Go frick yourself. Make something of your own before you criticize and shit over what other make. Ignorant cattle. Now present your next original zinger to trully buen me. Say something along the line of "HAHHAHAHA HE WON'T POST BECUZ HE AFRAID XD XD XD GOOD MORNING SIRS!"

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Good morning, sirs.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >So that you can just say "HAHA NGMI"
                Why so defensive?
                I don't care how hard and long you worked on my pizza, I care if it's tasty and the kind I wanted.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >art as a product
                Can't copyright AI swill. 😉

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >muh copyrights!
                so much for artistic integrity

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Your post was complete nonsense. Good job.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >>art as a product
                Most "artists" use their "art" for omissions and to sell what they make.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                You are not my customer so if you don't pay for shit that I make, I don't give a fricking damn about whether you like it or not.
                Hey, since you insist on making this about free market. Here's an idea. You pay me upfront, then I give you the drawing. Then you will be allowed to complain.
                Sounds fair? That's because it is not.
                The same way it is not fair to shit on someone's hand made art because you treat yourself like a bourgeois despit ethe fact that you're a slop eater.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I haven't shat on you, at least yet. You haven't even given my the proper chance.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                And I won't because you are not out there shopping for talent or in the good faith intention of trying to help me improve. This is a shitflinging thread where we are at eachother's throat. How stupid would I be if I gave you the knife to stab me with?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I never claimed to want to help you improve, I wanted you to present you art since you have your head up your ass about being a "creator".

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Yes, so you can shit on it.
                I already know the outcome, there is no point indulging you.
                I will deny you the respect that you deny me. Fricking die.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Yes, so you can shit on it.

                >So that you can just say "HAHA NGMI"
                Why so defensive?
                I don't care how hard and long you worked on my pizza, I care if it's tasty and the kind I wanted.

                Best of luck in your future endeavours.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Same shit I told you earlier. If you don't lay me, you can voice your conplaints to management.
                Here is my boss' number:

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                The insecurities of starving artists are out of this world.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                How can you know? You will never see my work.
                Frick you, pay me. This is about how superior you are because you get to keep your money? Then that's easy. Pay, then you'll be allowed to talk shit.
                In tye meantime, keep weakly trying to demoralize me because you're mad your little rivalry with artists is entirely made up and you talk from the perspective of an entitled, disrespectful consoomer cattle who loves to be spoonfed. No art for you.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Frick you, pay me.
                lmao, beg more

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Funny because I am not doing art for money and never pretended to. I am playing on your level. You are the entitled Karen customer who's most effort in the bargain is pulling money out of your purse which, in your mind, gives you all the right to treat me like a b***h.
                Well no money, no prostitute. I wpn't suck your dick unless you pay for it. So no money=absolutely worthless opinion.
                Again, voice this to my manager.
                Here is the number:

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >I wpn't suck your dick unless you pay for it.
                How admirable.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                They say being a prostitute id the oldest profession in the world because everytime you do anything for money, you prostitute yourself.
                No money=not your prostitute. Shove your entitled consoomer opinion down your throat and keep ordering from Domino's if eating literal shit can make you happy.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >They say being a prostitute id the oldest profession in the world because everytime you do anything for money, you prostitute yourself.
                You didn't talk about just anything, you talked about sucking dick.
                Shoo, homosexual.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Not that guy but my AI art gets praised outside of these threads too. Post your art.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >prompt says nude
                >she's clothed

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >my ai art
                It's not your art. You just made a request. The program took recreated other peoples data into an abomination.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >you didnt make the art, you just put the paint on a canvas

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                He knows. He's a troll.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >those feet

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >"masterpiece best quality"
                >finger, toothbrush, and mouth melting together
                >"nude"
                >she's wearing clothes
                >"hands"
                >it's just one hand with a random finger coming from the upper left

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >all those different rows of teeth in her mouth melting into her flesh
                >that four-toed foot
                >that random finger coming from behind her shoulder

                >aigays think this shit is good

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Look that that big finger growing from her back and her shirt merging into her chest area.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >huge finger growing out of her back and up to her face
                I love it when you pajeets put in "masterpiece" prompts for images that look like deformed garbage.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >that mouth
                >that hand
                >that foot

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >prompt says nude but she's wearing a clothes
                Yet again you morons show how incompetent this "AI" shit is. It keeps contradicting even your most basic inputs.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Oh yeah can you make this? Fricking art gays.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                is that an anus or a nipple?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                It can be whatever you want bb.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                AI messing up can be funny.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                The prompt also says to wear a shirt I just didn't post those because they're nsfw
                https://files.catbox.moe/cietua.png

                >lol troll u.
                I posted less total words so I win.

                It's just too easy.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                You replied to me.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                So you wanted the shirt to have a random opening that fades into the skin and a mouth where there's a row of flesh-teeth in the back?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I didn't know that Karen Araragi could grow an extra index finger out of her shoulder and only has 4 toes on each foot.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                That mouth is distractingly horrendous.
                Aigays post the deformed shit in full confidence.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Check it

                There's more to drawing then just money. I do it cuz its fun and rewarding. Nothing else compares to it.
                You do you, but if you do art for only money you're gonna burn out or get bored fast

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                This bugmen mentality really raises so many question as to which country you people are from. I've never met a single artist who got into art solely for money, there are always some degree of enjoyment out of the career they've choosen, if you ever had the opportunity to enroll in a school, you can even tell who might or not pursue an artistic career from an young age. Stop comparing art to stuff like working a factory and acting like they're the same for a living you fricking pajeet.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I'm a consoomer, and AI shit is pretty much 95% garbage. Who the frick jacks off to CG galleries of portraits? AI can't draw ANY fetish shit yet. Once it gets good, then we will see. It's simply not at the level of jacking off to yet.
                >but it will get better.
                And I look forward to it, but if the garbage slop it produces now is considered good, then it will stagnate. Especially since people seem to think AI = Artificial Intelligence, despite it just being a marketing gimmick like with VR.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Nope, my argument is simply that this debate in itself is fricking moronic. Clearly artists and slop eaters will never be on the same page, so why even try to one up eachother? You will never argue in good faith. You will never actually "win".

                Why not just eat your slop and stop pretending we live in the same world?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Cherry-picking is the point dude, he's replying to a guy cherry-icking shitty AI pics.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Still looks better in motion than AI art does.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Please, slow down on the copium, you will overdose.
                Enjoy this gif for ants.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                At least it doesn't flicker or look like rotoscoping.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            because AI is used by more than one person and it being more convenient and widely adopted means that there will be people who'll eventually use it to generate random inane shit?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        That has unironically already been happening for a low of really low effort stuff. But they are in markets already shit up, so AI art looks like an improvement.

  44. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    artbros, it's over...

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Gen alpha and its offsprings are your problem, I'll be dead long before you kids turn Earth in a living goy hellscape.

  45. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    No point, the government is gonna tax most of what I earn anyway

  46. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >DUUUDE AI
    >Meanwhile bank that holds every AI startups savings collapses
    These sites are all going to shut down by next week due to nonpayment of workers + hosting fees, enjoy proompting while you can

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >SVB was the only bank who would do business with people with insufficient liability
      >what ever will my shitty dirt-poor country do now
      dude should spend more effort on reducing the shitting in the streets problem instead of whining about their white savior.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >bank collapsed
      >bailout already approved
      Bro, US banks go trough several bailouts a year. Literal nothingburger. They already know they are too big to fail, so they just collapse every so often because they know they will be injected with fresh liquid cash from daddy goverment if they do.
      In the last 5 years there have been 9 insolvent US banks
      In the last 10 years it was like 48 or something.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I think what is different this time is the size

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Imao. Just look at the latest news regarding SVB, every piece is pro bailout. Its just gonna be the same old story. From what i heard it was not a total collapse either, isn't stuff below 250k or something covered?

  47. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    So………
    Where IS your game?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Anyone at all?

  48. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Why would anyone ever pay for AI art? Its like paying for someone to Google something for you.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I don't know but I've been seeing a lot of AI patreon and fanboxs

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >fan box
        >Pixiv is putting the screws on e-girl, shota, incest, and gore content because some AI gays posted art trained with CP

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >~~*some*~~ AI gays

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      There's still some sort-of-programming knowledge required to train these bots, and know what to feed it to get the desired result. Odds are you won't be able to get the same quality results that someone who has been tinkering with it for the last few months will.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        People who pay for art are weird. You've got to have pretty specific tastes to not just fap to basic settings.

  49. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    And people on this board were coping not even a month ago that AI art gets 'no engagement' compared to real artists kek

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >dude just make shovel ware crap. if everyone's doing it then the value will surely go up.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Did you actually need more proof that the average Ganker poster is a fricking low education pseud moron who likes to run his mouth exclusively about subjects he knows nothing about?

  50. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >ITT morons who don't know how ai works arguing about which one of them is right

  51. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    If making money was easy, everyone would be rich and if everyone was rich, nobody would be rich and money wouldn't be worth shit.
    So get the frick out with your get rich quick schemes that never fricking work.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The solution for that is fixating prices, so apples dont cost 1k dollars.

  52. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >One of my favorite artists is abusing AI to hell in order to make more art
    >While also being a fan of AI VTuber
    Sugee

  53. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Want to generate e-girl AI Art
    >Just know that as soon as I type that shit into stable diffusion I'll be put on a list

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Run it locally. Also, won't typing that here put you on the list too?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >not overloading their lists to the point of uselessness

  54. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >everyone shit on AI
    >use AI to make a h game
    >best fricking seller od dlsite

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      to be fair this guy is doing ai pixel art, everyone else is using the exact hyper realism prompt you see in gacha shit threads.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >aigays think low res garbled line art automatically makes it pixel art

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >pixel art
        It's literally running a CSP auto action over it. This is not pixel art lmao

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >that linework
        >that inconsistent colouring and shading
        I thought they took AI art and made sprite work out of it but holy shit they just downscaled the art instead and called it a day. They didn't even bother polishing up some sprites like the purple hair of the far left middle row girl.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >I thought they took AI art and made sprite work
          Doing that stuff would still take creativity and effort which is what aigays avoid at all cost.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Yeah and I hate it.
            >AI gives everyone the power to be creative and can be used as a tool to aid in any project
            >AI ends up just making people lazier and do the bare minimum for a quick buck
            Worst part is that it's working meaning instead of AI improving the quality of projects, it's only going to enable people to half-ass everything and make low quality shit because it sells.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              and this leds to the next crash, and from the ashes better games will rise again

              it will be the 90's all over again

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              You aren't making any sense. Right now you can barely draw stick men but the moment you pick up AI art you can "draw" anything you want. Laziness barely has a factor in the creation of images anymore. Once AI moves into other areas the same thing will happen. You'll "lazily" be able to make something on the level of -your favorite game-. In no way is this a bad thing if you enjoy video games.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >you cant draw lalalala
                >2 more weeks sir
                >everyone enjoys low-quality slop
                holy pajeet cope

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Feel free to prove me wrong but I'm making a reasonable assumption. And AI already is in other fields.

                >the moment you pick up AI art you can "draw" anything you want
                People draw and paint because they have a love and passion for creating things and improving their skills. It's not about random images popping up. Soulless bug.

                And you can have a love and passion for creating and improving with AI too. You say I'm soulless but you're just ignorant and angry.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Hello sir!

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                You sure showed me with this poor woman has a disjointed deformed right arm. Is your eye sight this bad or have no never seen a person before?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >My passion is typing words into a machine that steals pics and smashes them together

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Feel free to prove me wrong
                The burden is on you to prove your bullshit.
                Also its not AI, which shows how obvious of a moronic shill you are
                you can't

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                That's not how it works lol. You're trying to argue without making any points. I said you cannot draw, you proved you cannot draw by not refuting me with your art.
                >B-B-BUT SEMANTICS
                lmao.

                >'you can "draw" anything you want'
                >posts a generated image that doesn't follow what was wanted in the prompt

                But it followed it perfectly, it's a character + booru tags.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >prompt says "hair between eyes"
                >non of the characters have hair between the eyes

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                the world is ending ......... My Yoshida loras that don't like bangs fought the prompt off. It's ogre.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >the moment you pick up AI art you can "draw" anything you want
                People draw and paint because they have a love and passion for creating things and improving their skills. It's not about random images popping up. Soulless bug.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Good for them but most of us just want the art to enjoy the end product of, and this tech makes it easier for us to get what we want.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >prompt says "bobcut"
                >character doesn't have a bobcut

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                That is not a messy long bob cut. ANd it's definitely not a masterpiece with those deformed eyes and hand.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >'you can "draw" anything you want'
                >posts a generated image that doesn't follow what was wanted in the prompt

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >pick up AI art you can "draw" anything you want
                So you wanted a woman with eyes looking in opposite directions with deformed irises, eyelids that look like they've been burned, front teeth that look like a toothbrush bristles, and fingers that look like they belong to an alien?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                pyw

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >you can "draw" anything you want
                Except, yknow, any detail. It's fricking horrendous at small details.
                The image-producing AIs are currently heavily coasting on the fact that human brains are VERY good at filling in blanks and bridging things that are "close enough," which works very well at a glance but is useless for anything that wants to have fine detail.
                This is compounded by the fact that SD spits out what, a 512x512 image on most settings?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                You and I both know that isn't true and you can get higher resolutions.
                https://github.com/pkuliyi2015/multidiffusion-upscaler-for-automatic1111
                This came out recently for NASA tier resolutions. Feel free to use it.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Like I said. Good at a glance, falls apart at any cursory inspection.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Now open the link

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >open link
                >click on example image
                >immediately greeted with this
                Please tell me you're false flagging.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Shadows are inconsistent with light source.
                The furniture placent makes no sense because it seems to be placed against a non existing wall where the character face
                The book doesn't hold on anything.
                Human proportions are shit.
                Floor tiles are layered over eachother.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I wonder if they have self awareness.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >open link
                >click on example image
                >immediately greeted with this
                Please tell me you're false flagging.

                For the love of god please tell me you are false flagging, you can't believe this looks good.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Did you not look at this before you posted it? It's nonsense.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                That's the point, he's arguing against it.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                That's my point.
                It's from the "super high res ultra detailed" example in that github.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Perspective makes no sense.
                Everything in the environment blends together in an uncanny way.
                There is no sense of depth, the image feels flat.
                Terrain elevation is not consistent
                I won't even comment on those faces.

                Why are AI gays so allergic to accepting that they just don't appreciate quality?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Not that anon, but it adds "detail" in the sense that it's just an upscale guesser.
                It doesn't add anything and only makes existing "details" sharper or more pronounced no matter how nonsensical they are.

                tl;dr it's worthless for anything but upscaling normal art

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                That's not what it's doing, upscaling is inherently blurring or stretching pixels but this isn't upscaling.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                This looks fricking terrible.
                Now I understand why morons claim that "AI" is photobashing.
                If you don't know how it works and look at stuff like this it would be an obvious conclusion.

  55. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Guys, it's the economy. Doesn't matter if its quality is too 'shit'. It only matters that it is CHEAPER than the alternative. The fact that AI's cheap and you can get PLENTY of prompts out of it compared to ONE commission of artists is what should be worrying you. That and the fact that the near-instant making of the art is also pretty cool.
    That and all the artists I liked went to the ether a long ass time ago, I AM GOING TO REVIVE THEIR ARTSTYLE WITH AI

  56. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Good morning, sirs.

  57. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Too much work for the money, and that's if your project takes off amd isnt overlooked in a sea of indie games.

  58. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Drawslaves on suicide watch.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >The 5th one
      AI animation technology is still raw, but this definitely might be possible in the near future.

  59. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I will not play for ai

  60. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Gosh, I sure hope AI doesn't replace actual artists, it's so soulless!
    >actual artists

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      AI can't replace artists because it needs art for it to function lmao, it's the same as needing coal miner's output for the machines to work. AI can't create anything really new, it's just a rehash from what has already been created.

      >t. work with AI

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >AI can't replace artists
        You sure it can't replace the dozens of generic fotm uninspired hacks?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Yeah sure, the jobs of lesser known artists may be impacted and it'll be harder for new artists to get jobs until they get more skill, that's the worst of it.

  61. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >literally the exact same shill posts and images as every other ai thread

  62. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >HAHA PHYSICAL LABORERS LOSING THEIR JOBS TO AI LMAOOO!! WAIT AI IS TAKING OVER ART, WRITING AND CODING JOBS??? WTF THIS ISNT SUPPOSED TO HAPPEN TO MEEE!!! I HAVE ALWAYS BEEN AGAINST AI WTF SHUT THIS DOWN RIGHT NOW! PROGRESS IS BAD!!!!

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >>HAHA PHYSICAL LABORERS LOSING THEIR JOBS
      Artists never acted like this. You're thinking of tech bros and republicans won't pay for welfare or retraining.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        t. seething lying artroony

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Nobody was saying "learn to draw", tho.

  63. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I'm gonna say it. I actually really like the look of these pixelated (dot-art) -esque AI art games.

  64. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Why do people still reply to these bot threads?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Not everyone just dismisses subjects they don't like as the work of bots I guess

  65. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    how are you dealing with the mental blow, fellow art sisters?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      D-dont worry! Ai is imperfect! Its just a fad and your imagination will always triumph!

      Hate this shit, AI is a fricking TOOL, just like fricking PHOTOSHOP. Just tell AI just make something and then YOU, THE ARTIST, fix things and clean it up.

      BOOM, your still an artist, you did some work. Stop being a fricking pussy about emerging tech. What, do you want to go back to marble statues that 99.9% of current artists couldn't hope to make look as good as the masters?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >What, do you want to go back to marble statues that 99.9% of current artists couldn't hope to make look as good as the masters?
        Yes you fricking Black person.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Just tell AI just make something and then YOU, THE ARTIST, fix things and clean it up.
        It would be easier just to design and draw it the right way in the first place.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          You say that but you won't post your art because it's shit compared to AI.

          basic income will become the baseline
          never gonna be a thing in a capislistic society

          Capitalism as you know it won't survive the AI uprising.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            If I create something I can copyright it. If fix AI sewage I'm screwed. It's useless. Make a cg back ground with pre made models and a drawn fore ground is the way to go.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Dude, people love drawing and painting. It's not about random images popping out and then you trying to fool people out of their money with them.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          if you love drawing and painting, why do you care if other people use AI?
          how does it stop you from drawing and painting?

  66. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      roll

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      rollan

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      redeeming

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      roll

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      sir

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Roll

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      knknknk

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      DOUBLE ZERO BABY LETS GO

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Good morning Sirs!

  67. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    CODE RED FELLOW JEETS
    AI IS TAKING OUR JOBS

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Middle management AI when?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Management is hard to code because you keep having to make branches for every possible contingency.

  68. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Good morning sirs.

  69. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    So where's the games?

  70. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >invent AI
    >all you can make for profit is coom
    >it's probably astroturfed as well
    lol

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      are there a lot of non-porn artists out there that are making a decent living? thats news to me

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Comic artists have decent odds because medium is engaging.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      people in the 80's thought we'd be on mars by now and all we have is nuns with spoon thumbs

  71. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    This isn't even an aritical intelligence.
    It's a program that got feed billions of images from google.
    Think of it like remakes of original images. Why would I consoom remake when the superior original art exists somewhere in the internet?
    Software doesn't know how to draw, can't even draw anything original. It copies (inb4 le humans are just fleshly machines by anons who look like soijak irl)

    But none of tihs matters. This thread is a bait and OP never did art, coding or even played a video games in 2023.
    Another adhd riddled zoomer or manchild looking for attention.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >It's a program that got feed billions of images from google.
      and each one of those images has been reduced to less than two bytes of data
      the AI creates new images with the patterns it has learned, exactly like "real" artists
      tards think it just takes images from google and merges them, but it's literally impossible when it has less than 2 pixels worth of data from those images

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I know what a model is thank you.
        It still doesn't make my post wrong.
        It got feed billion images to make the model get where it is.
        >the AI creates new images with the patterns it has learned, exactly like "real" artists
        This is straight up dishonest.
        and stop calling it AI

  72. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >paying for porn
    >paying for AI GENERATED PORN

  73. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Soon 90% of jobs will be replaced with basic AI
    >Universal basic income will become the baseline
    >A lot more people will know the joys of being NEET and able to do what you want all day

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >frog
      >stupid gibberish
      everytime

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Sadly lots of people cant cope with neet life. Even 1-2 years under covid was too much for them to handle.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      basic income will become the baseline
      never gonna be a thing in a capislistic society

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      My most miserable time period in life was when I was being forced NEET.
      No money, broke all the time, couldn't do any cost related activities with my bros.
      Coyld barely even afford the alcohol that I used to kill boredom.
      Was bored all the time because I was too broke to invest iny hobbies, so all I could do all day was play vidya, binge Anime and get high+drunk.

      That was a shitty lifestyle. Working sucks, but at the very least, it makes me appreciate free time enough to make the most out of it. When I was a NEET, every day bled into the next and I actually lost my perspective on time after a while.

      Stop lying. You are no more happy as a NEET than I am as a a wageslave because the only way to trully appreciate being NEET is by being a millionaire NEET or one with actual decent income, which is, what? Not even 0.5% of NEETs?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I have a PC with internet connection, enough food to not go hungry and enough money to buy one or two videogames each month.
        You don't need more than that to be happy.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >You don't need more than that to be happy.
          I actually do. I need projects, I need to create.
          For that, you need money.
          You're happy? Good for you. I was not.
          Flash news: We are not some mass of samefaces who all behave the same, work the same and need the same things. If you are content with complacent consumption, that is great for you. This future was made for you. This future, in contrast, makes me miserable. What good is life without the capacity to explore your potential?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Finished mandatory education and did ten years neet, then after a years employment another 8. Best time of my life and I miss it constantly. All I needed was a PC +internet and that PC can be shockingly shit. I was on a 2007 vista PC until 2018. It ran youtube and emulators for PS1 downwards which was more than enough. Also I dont drink (all alcoholic drinks taste foul) and have NEVER touched drugs. More entertainment than you can consume in 10 lifetimes is available for free and the idea of being so tied to money for hobbies truly baffles me.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          That's the difference, I am not looking to be entertained.
          I want in life. I am not here to sit around, being hypnotized by screens forever. As minimalist as it is, it killed my mental health. I want to spend my limited time here forging bonds with people and acquiring investments for my future and that of our descendants.

          Wageslaving has allowed me to train in a craft that I love, save money to own my own house away from the city far enough in the woods that I have a river going through my land and I have the project car that I have always wanted to own.
          Am I materialistic? Hella. I will admit it. I don't want to love life as a minimalist poorgay because, from my experience, no matter what your life is, it's going to be miserable to an extent, so trying to smugly one up eachother over havibg different perspective is both juvenile and pointless.
          I focus on what makes me happy and you focus on what makes you happy..All I'm saying is that to appreciate the poorgay NEET life, you need to want veeery very little becausr you really don't get much out of it if you want to be active in your existence.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >he says while sperging out on Ganker

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Ok, how is this invalidating my point? You think active people are 24/7 on a schedule? I deserve my day off too homosexual.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >he says as he trolls on Ganker

            we both know you are only doing this because this is the closest thing to genuine human interaction you will get today.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Some people don't have what it takes to be a NEET and need le hustle and bustle of being wageslave cattle. Only normalgays can get bored when given a PC and internet connection. There is so much shit you can do for free or for a small one-time investment.
        >finding and watching good movies, shows, anime
        >finding and reading good books, manga
        >playing or replaying classic vidya
        >learning languages
        >learning instruments
        >learning/playing games like poker or mahjong
        >learning coding
        >learning to repair electronics to keep your spending down
        >learning to draw or paint
        >running, calisthenics, training with rings or maybe even a home gym
        >stretching yourself to be able to suck your own dick
        >going swimming
        >cooking and trying new recipes
        >planting stuff in your garden/balcony
        and thats just from the top of my head, add to that a few good NEET-minded friends and you can do pretty much everything except moronic status circlejerks that normalcattle participates in.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >Has to keep being some divisive homosexual with his head up his own ass about not working a job.
          I could just say you're coping because if you were trully happy, you wouldn't care about how artificially superior it makes you to someone else you don't even know. All I'm saying is I tried it and it didn't work for me so stop selling it as some sort of all around solution towarda happiness.
          Especially when your argument is like:
          >Only normalgays can get bored when given a PC and internet connection.
          That's the mindset of a consoomer cattle. In what right do you call me normalgay cattle when you are content with being plugged on a constant stream of "boredom preventing" israelite juice?
          >There is so much shit you can do for free or for a small one-time investment
          Yes and, then, it gets d and you want to do more. You have to be a fricking fool to think that money is optional to happiness. Even all of these hippies who fricked off to live innawoods in their huts, living their barefoot anti-materialistic vegan lifestyles had a several dozens of thousands of dollar wkrth investment in a proprerty or "house van".
          Eveeything cost money, homosexual. You act smug because you spend less, but you are as dependant on it as every slave in this society. Being NEET is just a different flavor of goy.
          >finding and watching good movies, shows, anime
          >finding and reading good books, manga
          >playing or replaying classic vidya
          I already do that. It gets old fast when that's all you do.
          >learning instruments
          Need money to buy good instruments, which are super expensive
          >learning languages
          You plateau stupidly early without practice and tuition
          >learning/playing games like poker or mahjong
          >learning coding
          Not interested
          to repair electronics to keep your spending down
          >learning to draw or paint
          >Cheap
          Are you out of your fricking mind? My pouch of pencils and alcohol sharpies is worth 300$ and I didn't buy the top brand. Not even close.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      UBI isnt going to happen. You and your personal army going to occupy wall street to get change enacted? Youll just end up at your parents house after losing your job. It takes effort to change the system.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        It will happen because it has to.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Nope. Someone has to lobby the politicians. It doesn't have to happen at all and a lot of big cities have homeless problems. Wheres the UBI now?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Imagine 1000x homeless.

            >>the pencil made it, you just wiggled it around
            How did you wiggle around the ai?

            That's the process. Dozens of extensions, an infinite amount of prompts and configurations, and an infinite amount of models. It's no less complex than traditional art. The product just comes out faster and generally better.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >promptoor
              You're a clown.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Stop being mad at a brush, it's weird.

                I never said that, don't put words on my mouth you fricking stupid tard. Ask chatGPT to explain posts before you reply, you brainfried moron.

                That's exactly what you said.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                You're the one who is mad because you're still replying to me. You're not an artist you're a proompter with bad taste.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I'm trolling you and winning internet arguments bro. Don't project, I'm an artist with impeccable taste.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >lol troll u.
                I posted less total words so I win.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Im imagining a very large tent city. If it hasnt happened already after Covid taking jobs away then its not going to happen.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I don't live in a 3rd world country (USA), so it will happen. In fact it has basically already happened in my country, and many other European countries.

        It will happen because it has to.

        Is right too, at some point the majority of people are going to lose their jobs to AI and automation.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Something will have to change

        Consider what the widespread implementation of automation across the board is going to do to the labor market

        Every major company is going to want to embrace such tech to replace large swathes of their workforce...but knowing that the workforce is also their customer base, and that EVERY company will want to do it at the same time, will mean that people everywhere will suddenly not be able to buy their products anymore without the income to afford it

        So what do they do to solve for this? Something will have to change, they're not just going to all say no to these innovations.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          yeah, youre going to languish in poverty on the grain doll, only useful as cannon fodder in wars, until we get another black plague.
          this has all happened before, and will all happen again. dont sleep through school

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            You don't get it dude. These corpos want to embrace automation, but only to make money, and embracing automation will mean people have no money to give them. Letting everyone starve to death still means no money. At the same time, individual corporations won't pass up automation for their own gain. How to solve this?

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              So corporations should pay 90% of their profits as taxes to the government instead? Theyll just leave the country.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                The only reason rich people are rich is because poor people have a lot less money. If everyone had a lot of money then rich peoples money would be worthless. The poor sacrifice for the rich peoples life style.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                There won't be profits, anon. If they automate the whole workforce out of their jobs, and nothing else changes, and everyone starves or whatever, then the widespread automation means they can't make money at all.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >How to solve this?
              where did you think nobles and kings and queens came from? that god himself really did descend from the heavens to anoint them? no, dipshit. some people at the top of their totem pole controlled lots of resources, which passed down in inheritance for long enough that they came up with constructs to rationalize it. and because wealth begets wealth, 1% of the people end up controlling 99% of the resources. we're just going back to that

              you think they give a FRICK that poorgays don't have money? why? why would they give a frick? you think the roman nobles were like, oh no, we've gotta invest into this steam engine because it's so important for us that the plebs live decent lives so that they can afford to spend money on useless shit? they DON'T. everybody will get fricking poor, the rich people will live in their mansions with tons of manservants and slaves and mercenaries and other shit to do all the stuff they want to have done. shit Black person, you think it's BAD for rich people that everyone else is poor? that's GOOD because then they can hire you to do literally anything for them, and if you piss them off then can just murder you and who's going to do anything about it? you don't have a vote, you don't have money, you have no fricking power whatsoever. you think that's a WORSE outcome for corporations? what do you think corporations are? machines? they're fricking social constructs made up of people, just like all the other constructs. if the abstraction of "the corporation" is destroyed by something that THE PEOPLE who comprise it think is good, then it will be destroyed. corporations aren't real. they don't exist. they're not alive. they don't have genes, their constituent parts don't have shared fate with each other. shit, the people in corporations aren't even fricking related to each other. these are LESS stable constructs than fricking feudal monarchies. they will not be doing ANYTHING to prevent their own destruction

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Cool babble bro.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Feudal systems are not a good comparison. For the nobility and royalty, their workforce and their income-sources were the same, the people. We are talking about a paradigm where automation replaces the people as the workforce, but the people are still what they're supposed to look to for income. But now those people can't make money to give them. And they sure can't tax the robots.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >*culls you instead*
      what now?

  74. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >ai spammer now posting about effort

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >noooo someone stole my no work that I did :~~*(

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The problem with AI is that it will never look exactly like you see it in your head. Maybe it can come close, but unless you have no imagination at all, it can't replace traditional art.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        soon™

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      reminds me of all the AItards mad at each other for "stealing" their texts

  75. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I prefer game engine development in C++ & GLSL that will never make me a single penny.

  76. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    can this thing draw textures for 3d models already?

  77. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Good day, sir.

  78. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    1. Getting consistent characters with AI is hard as frick right now even if you train a LoRA or TI on them.
    2. I only got a 12gb vram card so I couldn't upscale to a resolution that would be acceptable.
    3. Fixing the mess the AI makes is still too much work for me. Models are getting better but there aren't good enough where I would feel comfortable selling AI shit to people yet.

    In a year maybe but it's too soon. AI still looks sloppy right now.

  79. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    If you're making "art" for money then you're not making art anyway. AI obliterates commercial "artists" (twitter drawtroons) but true expressions of art are non-commercial and therefor not effected by AI flooding the market.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      This. Although I don't agree with the
      >obliterates commercial "artists" (twitter drawtroons)
      part.

  80. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    BABBDI used AI generated assets.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Wow it looks like shit!

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah.

  81. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    did artists react the same way when cameras were invented?

  82. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >ai still can’t give anime girls specific tattoos
    Trash

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >into tats
      cringe

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Have you tried inpainting? It's also worth noting that some models are better at displaying text than others.

  83. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >another thread where the AIgay spams the same shill posts whenever anons start asking for proof of basic functionality

  84. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  85. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >but I wasted my entire life drawing everything frame by frame!!
    >i wasted my entire life working out!!
    >i put "effort" in, that means my work is good!

    Artcels are fricking finished. What matter is result. If you can prompt a good game, nobody cares if AI made it, and everyone would do it instead of wasting their life drawing. If you could press a button to get an instant fit body to attract women, everyone would do it instead of wasting their life picking up a metal like caveman.

    You wasted your life and you are inefficient, youre supposed to work SMART. Not hard

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >wasting their life drawing
      People draw and paint for the love of creating things and honing their skills.

  86. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Just when I thought people couldn't be even more pathetic, there are morons actually paying for Ai shit.
    I guess NTR being the single most popular fetish over there makes sense. Actual cuck behavior.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah it's really fricking weird going on a bunch of sites and people offering to run a prompt for the same price of someone drawing art.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It's just art. If you want more you can pay for it.

      >prompt says nude
      >she's clothed

      I added something else in the prompt to add clothing, it's some anon's prompt and it was nsfw :^)

      >my ai art
      It's not your art. You just made a request. The program took recreated other peoples data into an abomination.

      >It's not your art.
      Yes it is.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        No it isn't. The program made it. You just put in a request.
        >you didnt make the art, you just put the paint on a canvas
        lol he asked the program do to something. It's not his.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >the pencil made it, you just wiggled it around

          I make a living making hentai rpg maker games and can't wait for AI to advance further. While people are scared, I see AI as an opportunity to have a whole studio working for me. It will be cool and all to have "standalone" games made automatically, but without any kind of human intervention these things tend to get lost in a sea of generic information. For example, people have endless porn and hentai on search engines, if you type in the keywords you'll get hundreds of thousands of results, but still people are on Patreon and similar sites paying artists. Because having a bunch of information given to you without context is not the same thing as having some sort of relationship with the "artist" you like and trust.
          If we get to the point where games are made automatically, that means that someone qualified is going to have the opportunity to create really amazing things. Imagine all of us anons here having digital slaves ready to help us to create our animations, our games, according to our wishes and instructions...

          This guy gets it.

          The better Ai gets, the more worthless games will become. There's no money in the future for games.

          You already pirate games so this is a fairly moot point. Games getting better in quality while also becoming cheaper is a good thing. Or are you Bobby Kotick?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >>the pencil made it, you just wiggled it around
            How did you wiggle around the ai?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            I don't pirate games, tard.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Then you're mentally handicapped for wanting games to be expensive lol. Was this really the point you wanted to make?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I never said that, don't put words on my mouth you fricking stupid tard. Ask chatGPT to explain posts before you reply, you brainfried moron.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        While I am a big a fan of the breasts depicted in that image, current AI art lacks intent and attention to detail. It can barely make ornamentation and machinery.

  87. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >gt 710 2gb
    Take a single guess as to why

  88. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I make a living making hentai rpg maker games and can't wait for AI to advance further. While people are scared, I see AI as an opportunity to have a whole studio working for me. It will be cool and all to have "standalone" games made automatically, but without any kind of human intervention these things tend to get lost in a sea of generic information. For example, people have endless porn and hentai on search engines, if you type in the keywords you'll get hundreds of thousands of results, but still people are on Patreon and similar sites paying artists. Because having a bunch of information given to you without context is not the same thing as having some sort of relationship with the "artist" you like and trust.
    If we get to the point where games are made automatically, that means that someone qualified is going to have the opportunity to create really amazing things. Imagine all of us anons here having digital slaves ready to help us to create our animations, our games, according to our wishes and instructions...

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The better Ai gets, the more worthless games will become. There's no money in the future for games.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >There's no money in the future for games

        are you implying thats a bad thing?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Good luck trying to sell your ai shit.
      Why would I pay for your crap when I can just make it myself?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Because the idea is not to generate AI assets indiscriminately, it's to know how to act as the director of a project and direct the work of your "employees" according to your vision. You will be the project leader using AI to create the part that you aren't competent or don't want to waste time with, while you take care of the experience as a whole and take care of the part where you are proficient.
        Of course, for this to become a reality it will still take a lot of time yet. As I always say, we were promised that AIs would make human drivers obsolete... by 2015. The idea that AI will work like a professional is quite naive, for now we are at a "cool tool" level.

  89. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Choose one:
    >learn a skill such as drawing, 3d, coding, music etc.
    or
    >spam bait threads about ai singularity for 10 years.

    You should be able to solve this.

  90. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Anybody here inside the new "closed-gate" Art communities?
    I don't like doing timelapses or sharing my work files, but I had to share them to get in. Kinda annoying but worth it honestly, I like discussing process stuff with other artists and most spaces are getting clogged/pozzed/invaded nowadays.

  91. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Real artist that make art that's nice, fulfilling and creative are safe.
    Porn peddlers are absolutely completely and utterly fricked.
    If you sell porn you're about to die of starvation and that makes me beyond elated.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >If you sell porn you're about to die of starvation and that makes me beyond elated.
      That's wrong though. Maybe the common peddler, but the big guys have tons of fans and have only gotten bigger since AI cause people like the "real thing".

  92. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    so, now that we have all this AI shit, when are we getting some good mods for old games like fallout 2, gothic, etc. where the AI voice acting and art can be put to good use?

  93. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I like how everyone here is pretending they're artists and still cant draw for shit

  94. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The only good thing about these "ai" spamming pajeets is that they have made people hate "ai" and have also gotten "ai" banned from many places.

  95. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >ctrl + f pajeet
    >9 hits
    He's already here.

  96. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    There is somethings you didn't really realize yet, but AI art has revolutionized Notebook and Journal creation. All the work was with the cover. They were already made with templates, but now AI art means the covers can be made in seconds without real work. It's already having an effect due to how low effort it is and how easy it is to set up, and there are some child book writers that have started talking about it in their facebook groups. The more it's embraced by the average normalgay without them saying it's AI art, the more it slowly takes hold.

  97. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I'm just waiting for the game where the story is AI-generated and the art is AI-generated to cater specifically to my tastes. A few years off but it's within reach.

  98. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Artistsisters....Hold me..... I'm scared..... These AI nazis are going to kill us..........

  99. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Why are artcels racist against Indians?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Indians aren't a oppressed minority.

  100. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    how do I Begin

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      https://rentry.org/voldy

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        thank you

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous
  101. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Wow it's crap!

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      post more comfy art

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        the dreaded foot witch

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Artbros, it's Joever... How can a computer generate such perfect detail...?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      What da dog doin'?

  102. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I would try it out but im gatekept by the hardware requirements lol

  103. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >the moronic Ganker schizo is in the AIshill thread again

  104. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    AI is going to be phenomenal for learning skills. Imagine having a perfect AI partner that can analyze what you're doing and teach you very specifically where you need to improve with an instrument, or a language, or shit like fighting games/FPS. Being a mid-level artist/musician/writer for money will die out, but the people who keep doing those things as hobbies will be able to make significant advances in self-improvement without needing to pay for books or teachers.

  105. 1 year ago
    Sauceman

    >Ai pixel art
    >ダンジョン&ダークネス 大穴と自由の街エルバーン
    >https://www.dlsite.com/maniax-touch/work/=/product_id/RJ01018735.html
    Interesting

  106. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Hijacking this pajeet thread to ask if any of you know some good (real) creature artists to follow on Twatter? I know Nurikabenuri and sinsin

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      too late, thread is already dead. Here's a freebie for your noble attempt

  107. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Artgays need to accept that they are obsolete. You're done. Kaput. You wasted your life. AI is how art will be made moving forward and it will be much faster and better looking than all your years of effort. This is only the very beginning of the new era.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >You wasted your life
      But artists are people driven by love and passion for creating things. How is our life being wasted? Is the "ai" going to come to my house to shoot me?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Is the "ai" going to come to my house to shoot me?
        You'll end up doing that yourself when you realize that nobody is paying for your art anymore.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          But I have literally never even considered selling or asking money. I love drawing and painting and I do it because I love it.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            That's nice to hear, anon. If you don't need art to put food on your table, you'll be fine.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        my message is to professional artists who may be trying to get daddy government to make some silly laws. This tech makes the profession obsolete in most cases and they need to accept it. It's just a hobby now.

  108. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    where do people sell AI art? patreon ?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I won't tell you, since I'm downloading all the AI art posted in this thread to do what I want with. 🙂

  109. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >tfw manager at a warehouse
    >No risk of ever being replaced like artgays or techgays

    Feels good, going to make vidya in my free time with AI tools.

  110. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I've actually had an idea for something similar, but can't find a model/lora that does pixel art consistently. No idea how this guy managed it but kudos, the morons thinking this is easy have no clue how AI works.

  111. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Pay 600 for one drawing
    >Pay 15 for thousands of drawings
    Hmmm..
    This mostly just seems to be the end of artists who want to charge outrageous prices. Though probably not considering that they just need people that like THEIR drawings.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Almost every "artist" who seethes about AI art was in it for money. They don't give a shit about "expressing themselves" or "doing it because they love drawing". They were learning to draw because they saw 100$+ commission prices for porn and decided that they want a slice of it.
      So every time an "artist" seethes about AI, ask them how much money they were making/planning to make from their art and watch them go on a defense with common buzzwords.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        They express themselves by drawing fotm schlop for money. ART

  112. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Ignore the seething /ic/ gays. They're coping with becoming irrelevant. All they can do is say AI art looks bad and then go on rants about imaginary indian shills.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      But anon, not even /ic/ likes artists. Have you never heard of /ic/ crabs?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I thought the indians were against the AI?

  113. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Why do jannies keep allowing these obvious low quality bot threads?

  114. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >/ic/ boogeyman
    shills on suicide watch already

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Seething art critics don't come from /ic/? come on now.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >indian boogeyman
      artists on suicide watch already

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        get your government to spend money on sanitation and sewage treatment.

  115. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    If all tech is good no matter what, then get yourself a brain chip. It’s the future after all, so you must accept it.

  116. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    You will never be an artist

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *