Why call these next gen consoles if they have PS3/360 levels of performance and visuals?

Why call these next gen consoles if they have PS3/360 levels of performance and visuals?

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Consolefags have no standards

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I do, I don't buy trash that runs like shit

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >I do
        >I buy any console game
        ????????? lol

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    stop being so entitled you piece of shit

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >entitled
      >developers literally cannot make complete games anymore
      >games look and run worse than they did last gen
      all modern developers deserve flagellation for their ignorance

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        They're making more money while spending less.
        There's nothing more competent in capitalism

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >sabotaging future sales and image for current savings
          caveat venditor

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The absolute fucking state of this generation.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      they patched it so it's higher res now
      at launch it was 324p

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >at launch it was 324p

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >768x432
      Jesus fucking christ, that's like PS2.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Sub-720p even on Series X and PS5
      What the fuck is going on with this generation?

      J U S T
      U
      S
      T

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      432p time to bring back the crt, boys

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You're fucking retarded if you ever expect consoles to not run and look like dogshit, regardless of how many trailers you watch and blog posts you read that insist otherwise.

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Sub-720p even on Series X and PS5
    What the fuck is going on with this generation?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Competence crisis

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I don't believe in this. I believe there's a motivation crisis. people in the 70s-90s (depending on which industry) and before had two huge advantages going for them:
        - reasonable compensation for their work, in terms of purchasing power. do anything, get paid fairly for it. do better, get paid even more.
        - no problems finding love as social media hadn't ruined everybody's brain yet and obesity hadn't ruined half of all women yet. so men had a REASON to want to earn as much money as they could. they had wives and children at home.
        what the fuck do you gain nowadays if you do your job well? jack shit. there's no incentive any more.
        then specifically for video games there's another reason: in the 2000s games still had soul so it felt gratifying to work on a game, for its own sake. now games are lootbox gambling traps and padded filler shit to fleece hardcore fanboys. when your task is to make a soulless money extraction mechanism and your audience is framed in terms of who is the most gulligble, vulnerable, wealthy victim, it would be much harder to stay motivated. this goes for games but I guess it also goes for anything on the internet as everything online is a scam. it's like working as a telemarketer or salesman of sorts. it's not what people passionate about VIDEO GAMES would want to do, yet it's what game development has turned into. the medium died with 7th gen, horse armor, day one patches, WoW...

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      upscalers like fsr and dlss makes devs lazy when it comes to optimization

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Optimization. Or should I say. 0 optimization. An overall attitude of "we will fix in post" and then they drag ass to fix.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >they drag ass to fix
        >implying they fix it at all
        some just give up

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      There's many recent games that are very well optimized and look great, like Lies of P.
      There's definitely something wrong with Unreal Engine 5 though, every single game using it runs horribly

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >There's many recent games that are very well optimized and look great, like Lies of P.
        Yes but those games are creoss-gen.
        The developers have to make the game work at 720p-1080p on base Xbone/PS4 and it gives a lot of headroom for higher settings, resolution and frame rates on the newer consoles and PC.
        With next-gen games devs target 720p-1080p on Series X/PS5 and call it a day, not bothering to optimize further because it's already playable on those systems.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >We are going backwards instead of forward, Crysis was made in 2007, look better than 90% of today games
      garbage planet

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Lazy devs, Killzone 2 and 3 still shit on most PS5 and PS5 games

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        To prove my point

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It’ll only go to that lower resolution to prevent a drop in framerate.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Watch the video, none of the versions can maintain 60 FPS even when just running through an empty corridor.
        Which means they all spend most of their time around the lower bounds of that dynamic res scale.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Lower res means more performance available for graphics. Only very stupid people, like you, want more pixels instead of better graphics.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Yea, I sure love these amazing graphics.
        What's that? Deferred rendering? Temporal whoswhatsit?
        Never heard of 'em, who needs more pixels when you can just have better grafix, those things definitely aren't related in any way, shape, or form!
        Just look at these amazing graphics rendered at beautiful 480p, mmmmmm!!

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Are you fucking stupid? They are pushing better graphics at the expense of BOTH performance and resolution, so it looks like a blurry mess and has constant FPS drops anyway.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Resolution aside, this game (like all other UE5 games released thus far) doesn't even look all that special.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >lower image quality means more performance for image quality. Only very stupid people want better image quality instead of better image quality

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      1.) You don't have harsh hardware constraints that encourage ingenuity anymore and a corporate culture of software engineers not even attempting to write games that run at a reasonable speed and excuse their poor programming with "the hardware is fast enough that I shouldn't have to bother." They don't even see this as a problem.
      2.) Companies chasing ESG money, bogging everything down with naggers and women because the economy is fake and gay and they are trapped like a hamster on a wheel chasing investor money and loans of loans since consumers buying your product just isn't enough anymore.

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    LotF is just badly optimized
    Blame UE5, it's just shit
    The game would've been better on UE4

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Wtf

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Not sure why you're blaming the hardware. The X and PS5 are both decently powerful machines. (The S is dogshit so it's understandable that a game runs like shit there, but the other two have no excuse.)
    It's just a shit game. There were PS4 games that looked and ran much better.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Nah. They're about 1/8th of a 4090. Making them a generation behind.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Not that guy but PS5 has much better hardware for 2020 than PS4 had for 2013. There is no excuse for games to be hitting sub-720p resolutions on it. It's beyond laughable and a clear sign of a poorly optimized game.

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >why does this shitty janky rushed game run like shit?
    it is a mystery.

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Disingenuous post. Everything has frame drops. You took a screenshot during traversal stutter. The Xbox Series X is equivalent to a 3080 TI. It's better than 95% of Ganker users PCs at a price point of only $500. That's why it causes so much seethe.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Yup, 10 seconds long traversal stutters are fine nothing to see here.

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Stop playing janky souls ripoff games with a shoestring budget then.

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >The Xbox Series X is equivalent to a 3080 TI
    LMAO

  13. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Series X is the strongest console ever created. Talk all the shit you want, you still have to use upscaling tricks on your PC to play Xbox games. The days of PCs being substantially stronger than consoles are over.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *