Why do games from 2022 barely look better than a game from 2007?

Why do games from 2022 barely look better than a game from 2007?

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Game above looks funner and it looks like your character will actually respond when you press a button

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Technology has stagnated.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Not really. It's being held back on purpose. No point in pushing it really when the consumer will literally eat shit.

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Consoles

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    crysis doesn't look that good anymore

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Crysis looks like dogshit today

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Crysis looks like dogshit today

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I hope you get shot in your home the next time you boot up your favorite movie game

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        YWNBAW troony

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Pull up, hoe
        I'm playing Uncharted Lost Legacy right meow

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          I will be tomorrow on PC

          everyone played crisis on console

          Bro are you fricked in the Head they didnt even port it till like 3 years later.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            it was like how btow flopped on wiiu then became a success on switch

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Its more like you blow me and i come in ur mouth

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    jews

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    how the frick was crysis so ahead of its time jesus christ

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      talent vs. diversity hires, people also keep forgetting you can chop off most trees in crysis

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    is it true the crysis remaster downgraded the visuals?

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Because you're stupid, blind and don't understand what you're talking about.

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    top doesn't support 4k but bottom does. the pic being 1080p works in favor of the top
    bottom has much higher draw distance. being a pic rather than vid where you'd see pop-in works in the top pic's favor
    both pics don't feature the front of npcs or any close textures. that works in favor of the top pic. pic related

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >top doesn't support 4k
      Wtf are you talking about yes it does

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        nobody played crisis on pc

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >doesnt support 4K
      Man console Black folk are so fricking stupid

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        everyone played crisis on console

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >top doesn't support 4k
      it's a PC game. What in the Black person frick are you talking about?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        oh the edge

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      what are you on about, RDR2 has obvious popin everywhere.

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Graphical technology has been barely advacing and it will virtually stagnate from 2050 on.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      2050? How fricking high are you i want some. Its already stagnated to hell and back

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Diversity hires set the development back, specially in the programming sector.

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >NOOOOOO NOT A 2006 GAME THAT RAN ON A 8800GTX AND A CORE DUO WITH 2GB OF RAM HAVING BAD LOD
      >HOW COULD THIS HAPPEN
      >ILL JUST INGORE THE REST OF THE PICTURE!!!!
      NOOOOOOO MR.X LEAVE ME ALONNNE NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        yes, pointing out an ugly part of the screen requires ignoring the rest of the picture. I can also point out the flat angled palm leaves if you'd like. or the rock texture on the right of the gun. or the rock texture under the minimap. or how blurred the mountain is where the crosshair is.
        face it, the game is ugly now

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Hehe, this OLD 2006 game looks so much better than this NEW 2018 game.
        *points out how it doesn't*
        >REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
        Cool thread.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          1 tiny place it doesnt match up is draw distance, thats it, seethe.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            There are several posts in this thread pointing out bad looking parts. RDR2 is a technological marvel while Crysis is an outdated tech demo. You're welcome.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              oh the edge

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous
      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        what seems to be the problem. a location over twice as far as the crisis mountains and it still manages to look fine

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Because games are made for console first and most people are still on last gen.

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Because the industry has lost its soul.

    >Crysis
    It was ahead of its time but that's still no excuse.

  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    once Crysis invented ambient occlusion and GI nobody was able to improve upon it until Ray Tracing.

  17. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Bottom looks much better.

  18. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >OP is a third world shitter overjoyed by the fact that after 16 years he can finally run Crysis

  19. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Crysis released with massive downgrades and struggled to run at 512x384 30fps all settings ultra on the latest hardware.

    Games aren't even made for low res anymore. They don't push hardware. It's all nearly 20 year old shit at 4k.

    Tldr high resolutions hold back graphics.

  20. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Pre downgrades still looks better than anything out there now.

    Scum like reviewer sites and ”digital foundry" advocated for high resolutions instead of high graphics. People listened to them and parroted the nonsense. That's why. Devs made to a new demand of idiots.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >instead of high graphics

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Digital Foundry helped promote high, stable framerates which is a good thing that outweighs all of the downsides to them getting popular.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        No. They promoted resolution which is the opposite of high stable framerates.

  21. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >In the year 2050, graphics look like real life
    >In the year 3000, graphics still look like real life
    Damn so much stagnation…

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *